A new genus of cave spider from Neotropical region (Gnaphosidae: Prodidominae) Author Rodrigues, Bruno V. B. Author Cizauskas, Igor Author Lemos, Yuji text Zootaxa 2020 2020-01-10 4722 1 77 83 journal article 275277 10.11646/zootaxa.4722.1.8 03b374c1-2626-4fed-86ef-a63ea42248da 1175-5326 3603724 8B45C687-4552-4C19-8E0F-C5C09389E97F Indiani gaspar s p. nov. Figs 1–4 Remarks. Individuals of Indiani gaspar sp. nov. were collected in limestone caves and has some typical troglomorphic traits of troglobite species, such as loss or reduction of eyes and weak pigmentation ( Christiansen 2012 ). However, as observed by Rodrigues et al. (2018) , these characteristics also are observed in epigean species of prodidominae and only the appendage elongation seems to be an important morphological indicative to determine species troglobites in subfamily. In addition, the lack of samplings in epigean habitats does not allow us to determine of the troglobitic status in I. gaspar sp.nov. Type Material. Male holotype from Brazil , Minas Gerais , Prados, Cave HOL_0020 ( 44°03’59”W 21°11’06”S ), 13–16 March 2017 , Eq. Spelayon leg., deposited in IBSP 201864. Paratypes : Brazil , Minas Gerais , Prados , Cave HOL_0001 ( 44°03’52”W 21°10’57”S ), 17–19 November 2014 , Eq. Spelayon leg., 1 female ( IBSP 201863 ) . Etymology. The specific name is a noun in apposition referring to character “Casper, the friendly ghost” that in Portuguese is known as “Gasparzinho”, once the species has weak pigmentation like a ghost. FIGURE 3. Indiani gaspar sp. nov. , genital organs: A, C) male palp, ventral view; B, D) same, retrolateral view; E) epigynum, ventral view; F) Same; G) vulva, dorsal view.A—atrium; C—conductor; CD—copulatory duct; E—embolus; FD—fertilization duct; MA—median apophysis; PEx—posterior extension of epigynum; RTA—retrolateral tibial apophysis. Diagnosis. See generic diagnosis. Description. Male ( holotype ). Total length: 1.54. Carapace 0.74 long, 0.68 wide; abdomen0.8 long, 0.54 wide; sternum 0.5 long, 0.44 wide; ALS 0.15 long, 0.06 wide. Eyes absent. Chelicerae 0.26 long.. Leg formula 4123; measurements: I: 2.02 (0.59, 0.25, 0.48, 0.35, 0.35); II: 1.78 (0.50, 0.27, 0.40, 0.31, 0.30); III: 1.68 (0.45, 0.22, 0.36, 0.34, 0.31); IV: 2.12 (0.60, 0.26, 0.45, 0.41, 0.40). Leg spination: I—femur d1-1-0, p0-0-1; tibia v1 p-2-2-2-2; metatarsus v2-2 -2. II—femur d1-1-0; tibia v1 p-2-2-2-2; metatarsus v2-2 -2. III—femur d1-1-0; tibia d0-2-0, p0-0-1, r0-0-1, v1 p-2-2; metatarsus v0-1r-2; p0-0-1. IV—femur d1-1-0; tibia d0-3-0, p0-0-1, r0-0-1, v1 p-1p-2; metatarsus p1-0-1, r0-1-0, v0-0- 1p. Palp as in generic description ( Figs 3 A–D). Female : Female ( paratype ). Total length: 1.88. Carapace 0.72 long, 0.54 wide; abdomen 0.98 long, 0.58 wide; sternum 0.53 long, 0.44 wide; ALS 0.15 long, 0.06 wide. Only ALE present. Eye diameter and interdistance: ALE 0.05; ALE–ALE 0.04. Chelicerae 0.25 long.. Leg measurements: I: 2.07 (0.57, 0.30, 0.50, 0.35, 0.35); II: 1.75 (0.50, 0.25, 0.40, 0.27, 0.33); III: 1.64 (0.44, 0.22, 0.32, 0.35, 0.31). Leg spination: I—femur d1-1-0, p0-0-1; tibia v2-2 -2- 2-2; metatarsus v2-2 -2. II—femur d1-1-0; tibia v2-2 -2-2-2; metatarsus v2-2. III—femur d1-1-0; tibia d0-1-0, p0-0- 1, r0-0-1, v0-1p-1p; metatarsus v0-2-2; p0-1-1; r0-0-1. Epigynum as in generic description ( Figs 3 E–G). Distribution. Known only from caves in Prados, state of Minas Gerais , Brazil ( Fig. 4 ).