Fishermyia stuckenbergi, a new genus and species of Afrotropical robber fly from Madagascar (Diptera: Asilidae: Stenopogoninae) Author Jason G. H. Londt text African Invertebrates 2012 2012-06-30 53 1 221 230 journal article 29774 10.5733/afin.053.0114 2d0f6def-9e98-4c10-811e-a13d0568b2bb 1301881 12A912F0-3937-474A-949C-9B41681FF65C Genus Fishermyia gen. n. Etymology: This genus is named for my much esteemed colleague Eric Fisher, whose knowledge of the Asilidae is legendary. Not only did he sort through many thousands of Malaise-trapped insects from Madagascar , but he immediately recognised the interest and importance of the material described in this paper. Feminine gender. Type species: Fishermyia stuckenbergi sp. n. Diagnosis: Stenopogoninae with the following combination of characters: postpedicel more than 1.5× longer than scape and pedicel combined and bearing a distinct style made up of three elements, including a terminal “seta-like” element; mystacal setation confined to the ventral third of face; proepisternum fine setose (a few moderately developed setae are present, but these are never as strong as mesonotal macrosetae); scutellum with a single pair of apical macrosetae; postmetacoxal area entirely membranous and asetose; only abdominal T1 with a group of strong macrosetae dorsolaterally; ♂ terminalia fairly slender, never bulbous. Key to genera of Afrotropical Stenopogoninae with setose anatergites (modified from Dikow & Londt (2000) to include Fishermyia ; it however excludes Oligopogon because of uncertainty of its subfamilial assignment) 1 Postpedicel (= third antennal segment) tipped with a small apical pit enclosing a “seta-like” sensory element....................................................................................8 – Postpedicel with a distinct terminal style made up of two or three elements (including a terminal “seta-like” element).............................................................2 2 Occiput with obvious macrosetae ..........................................................................4 – Occiput lacking macrosetae (i.e., with weak setae only).......................................3 3 Face relatively broad (eye:face-width ratio <1.1:1.0); scape clearly longer than pedicel; hypandrium less than half as long as epandrial lobes (western southern Africa) ............................................................................. Dioctobroma Hull, 1962 – Face relatively narrow (eye:face-width ratio>1.3:1.0); scape and pedicel about equal in length; hypandrium about as long as epandrial lobes (D.R. Congo).......... ........................................................................................... Dogonia Oldroyd, 1970 4 Proepisternum with a few strong macrosetae as well as fine setae; pronotal and mesonotal macrosetae very strong (flies have bristly appearance) (western southern Africa) ............................................................................ Anasillomos Londt, 1983 – Proepisternum with fine setae (some may be moderately developed, but never as strong as mesonotal macrosetae); pronotal and mesonotal macrosetae moderately developed ...............................................................................................................5 5 Abdominal T1–4 with groups of strong macrosetae dorsolaterally; antennal style consisting of two elements (one small basal segment and a “seta-like” sensory element); ♂ genitalia bulbous; ♀ T7 and T8 of nearly equal length ( western southern Africa ) ................................................................ Ontomyia Dikow & Londt, 2000 – Only abdominal T1 with groups of strong macrosetae dorsolaterally; antennal style consisting of three elements (two basal segments and a “seta-like” sensory element); ♂ genitalia slender, never bulbous; ♀ T8 distinctly shorter than T7 ( ♀ of Fishermyia unknown)........................................................................................6 6 Facial swelling pronounced both in lower and upper regions (southern Africa) ..... ................................................................................... Oratostylum Ricardo, 1925 – Facial swelling weak, only lower margin moderately pronounced........................7 7 Two or more pairs of apical scutellar macrosetae; mystax occupying almost entire face although sometimes weak in dorsal part; antennal postpedicel usually somewhat clavate, <1.5× longer than scape and pedicel combined (western southern Africa) .......................................................................... Remotomyia Londt, 1983 – A single pair of apical scutellar macrosetae; mystax occupying ventral third of face only, dorsal part asetose; antennal postpedicel elongate, spindle shaped,>1.5× longer than scape and pedicel combined (Madagascar)........... Fishermyia gen. n. 8 Facial swelling occupying approx. three-quarters of face and entirely covered with macrosetae and setae; presutural dorsocentral setae well developed; M 1 not strongly arched anteriorly; postmetacoxal membrane covered with long setae (southern Africa) ................................................................................. Daspletis Loew, 1858 – Facial swelling occupying at most half of face and often with macrosetae only on lower half; dorsocentral setae present only on posterior part of mesonotum; M 1 usually strongly arched anteriorly; postmetacoxal membrane usually asetose (widespread throughout the afrotropics) ................. Microstylum Macquart, 1838