Two new Bent-toed Geckos of the Cyrtodactylus pulchellus complex from Peninsular Malaysia and multiple instances of convergent adaptation to limestone forest ecosystems
Author
Grismer, L. Lee
Author
Wood, Perry L.
Author
Anuar, Shahrul
Author
Grismer, Marta S.
Author
Quah, Evan S. H.
Author
Murdoch, Matthew L.
Author
Muin, Mohd Abdul
Author
Davis, Hayden R.
Author
Aguilar, César
Author
Klabacka, Randy
Author
Cobos, Anthony J.
Author
Aowphol, Anchalee
Author
Sites, Jack W.
text
Zootaxa
2016
4105
5
401
429
journal article
39163
10.11646/zootaxa.4105.5.1
b0c40bc1-9e22-4422-bc18-6e5ddf1fd0ab
1175-5326
264750
3CBCC1EB-48BE-4730-A845-F64CFB196661
Cyrtodactylus hidupselamanya
sp. nov.
English: Chiku Bent-toed Gecko Malay:
Cicak Jari-bengkok Chiku
Fig. 3
,
4
Holotype
.
Adult male,
LSUHC
12163 collected on
19 March 2015
at 2030 hrs by Shahrul Anuar from Felda Chiku 7, Kelantan, Peninsular
Malaysia
(
5° 03.318” N
102° 08.573” E
;
110 m
elevation).
Paratypes
.
Paratypes
LSUHC
12158–62, 12164–65, 12173–75 bear the same collection data as the
holotype
.
Diagnosis.
Cyrtodactylus hidupselamanya
sp. nov.
can be differentiated from all other species of
Cyrtodactylus
by having the combination of the following characters: maximum SVL of approximately
199 mm
; 8–12 supralabials; 9–12 infralabials; weak tuberculation on body; no tubercles on ventral surface of forelimbs, gular region, in ventrolateral body folds, or anterior one-third of tail; 39–48 paravertebral tubercles; 19–23 longitudinal tubercle rows; 26–33 ventral scales; 19–24 subdigital lamellae on fourth toe; no femoral pores; 17–22 precloacal pores; deep precloacal groove in males; four dark dorsal body bands; body bands as wide or slightly wider than interspaces; no rostral chevron; body bands and nuchal loop edged with a thin white, tubercle bearing lines; no scattered white tubercles on dorsum; no banding on base of thigh; 8–10 dark caudal bands on original tail; white caudal bands generally immaculate; and hatchlings and juveniles bearing white tail tips. These characters are scored across all species of the
C. pulchellus
complex in
Table 5
.
TABLE 4.
Uncorrected p-distances among the species of the
Cyrtodactylus pulchellu
s complex based on 1473 bp of ND2 and its flanking tRNAs calculated in MEGA v6.06 (Tamura
et al
. 2013). Numbers in bold are within group distances.
C.
astrum
|
0.014
|
C.
australotitiwangsaensis
|
0.151 |
0.006
|
C.
bintangrendah
|
0.156 |
0.095 |
0.011
|
C.
bintangtinggi
|
0.149 |
0.100 |
0.086 |
0.004
|
C.
hidupselamanya
sp. nov.
|
0.166 |
0.152 |
0.160 |
0.146 |
0.000
|
C.
jelawangensis
|
0.159 |
0.160 |
0.161 |
0.155 |
0.091 |
0.000
|
C.
langkawiensis
|
0.095 |
0.146 |
0.147 |
0.142 |
0.174 |
0.164 |
0.001
|
C.
lenggongensis
sp. nov.
|
0.159 |
0.093 |
0.020 |
0.090 |
0.160 |
0.165 |
0.151 |
0.001
|
C.
lekaguli
|
0.095 |
0.135 |
0.145 |
0.142 |
0.158 |
0.151 |
0.092 |
0.143 |
0.000
|
C.
macrotuberculatus
|
0.167 |
0.115 |
0.119 |
0.113 |
0.171 |
0.161 |
0.177 |
0.119 |
0.174 |
0.034
|
C.
pulchellus
|
0.167 |
0.113 |
0.131 |
0.127 |
0.171 |
0.153 |
0.174 |
0.135 |
0.164 |
0.095 |
0.010
|
C.
sharkari
|
0.148 |
0.058 |
0.098 |
0.104 |
0.160 |
0.155 |
0.148 |
0.101 |
0.140 |
0.108 |
0.108 |
– |
C.
timur
|
0.171 |
0.146 |
0.153 |
0.156 |
0.056 |
0.099 |
0.163 |
0.158 |
0.155 |
0.183 |
0.181 |
0.159 |
0.004
|
C.
trilatofasciatus
|
0.148 |
0.064 |
0.104 |
0.106 |
0.163 |
0.155 |
0.141 |
0.107 |
0.137 |
0.118 |
0.115 |
0.017 |
0.162 |
0.009 |
TABLE 5
. Diagnostic characters differentiating the 15 species of the
Cyrtodactylus pulchellus
complex. W=weak; P=prominent; /=data unavailable.
Supralabials |
10–12 |
9–12 |
9–13 |
8–12 |
9–12 |
10–12 |
9–12 |
Infralabials |
9–12 |
9–13 |
8–11 |
8 or 9 |
8–10 |
9–11 |
7–10 |
Tuberculation |
W |
P |
P |
P |
W |
W |
P |
Tubercles on ventral surface of forelimbs |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Tubercles in gular region |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Ventrolateral fold tuberculate |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Paravertebral tubercles |
45–57 |
37–45 |
31–42 |
36–44 |
38–44 |
30–50 |
34–44 |
Longitudinal rows of tubercles |
22–29 |
23–30 |
21–26 |
22–25 |
22–25 |
20–24 |
19–27 |
Ventral scales |
31–46 |
32–40 |
36–40 |
31–39 |
31–36 |
31–43 |
17–28 |
4th toe lamellae |
20–24 |
21–27 |
21–25 |
21–24 |
19–21 |
20–25 |
20–24 |
Femoroprecloacal pores |
31–38 |
39–45 |
37–41 |
41–46 |
30 |
33–36 |
28–41 |
Precloacal groove in males |
Deep |
Deep |
Deep |
Deep |
Deep |
Deep |
Deep |
Body bands |
4 |
3(1) or 4 |
3(1) or 4 |
4 |
4 or 5 |
4 or 5 |
4 |
Body bands two times or more than the width of the interspace |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Dorsum bearing scattered pattern of white tubercles |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Hatchlings/juveniles with white tail tip |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
/ |
No |
Adult posterior caudal region white |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Dark caudal bands on original tail |
12–14 |
7–8 |
8–10 |
8 or 9 |
11–16 |
12–14 |
7–10 |
White caudal bands in adults immaculate |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Maximum SVL |
108.1 |
119.8 |
111.4 |
114.4 |
99.1 |
103.5 |
118 |
Sample size |
11 |
13 |
13 |
10 |
10 |
11 |
29 |
TABLE 5.
(Continued)
Supralabials |
11–13 |
9–11 |
10–12 |
11 |
9–12 |
10–12 |
9–12 |
10 or 11 |
Infralabials |
9,10 |
8–10 |
8–11 |
10 |
9–11 |
8–10 |
8–11 |
8–10 |
Tuberculation |
P |
P |
P |
W |
P |
P |
W |
W |
Tubercles on ventral surface of forelimbs |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Tubercles in gular region |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Ventrolateral fold tuberculate |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Paravertebral tubercles |
41–43 |
33–43 |
34–38 |
31 |
36–42 |
38–43 |
39–48 |
36–41 |
Longitudinal rows of tubercles |
23,24 |
22–26 |
23–27 |
24 |
23–25 |
21–24 |
19–23 |
22–25 |
Ventral scales |
22–24 |
29–34 |
33–36 |
41 |
31–36 |
31–40 |
26–33 |
32 or 33 |
4th toe lamellae |
19 |
21–26 |
22–27 |
24 |
21–24 |
21–25 |
19–24 |
20–23 |
Femoroprecloacal pores |
33–36 |
34–39 |
41–46 |
46 |
36 |
21 or 22 |
17–22 |
39–41 |
Precloacal groove in males |
Shallow |
Deep |
Deep |
Shallow |
Deep |
Deep |
Deep |
Deep |
Body bands |
3 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 or 5 |
Body band/interspace ratio |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Dorsum bearing scattered pattern of white tubercles |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Hatchlings/juveniles with white tail tip |
No |
No |
/ |
/ |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
/ |
Adult posterior caudal region white |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Dark caudal bands on original tail |
8,9 |
8–10 |
6 |
7 |
10 |
8–10 |
8–10 |
14 |
White caudal bands in adults immaculate |
Usually |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Maximum SVL |
114.7 |
114.6 |
122.2 |
100.1 |
119.8 |
120.5 |
102.7 |
103.1 |
Sample size |
3 |
13 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
14 |
4 |
Description of
holotype
.
Adult male,
97.5 mm
SVL; head large, moderate in length (HL/SVL 0.30), wide (HW/HL 0.67), somewhat flattened (HD/HL 0.36), distinct from neck, triangular in dorsal profile; lores concave anteriorly, inflated posteriorly; frontal and prefrontal regions deeply concave; canthus rostralis rounded anteriorly; snout elongate (ES/HL 0.45), rounded in dorsal profile, laterally constricted; eye large (ED/HL 0.26); ear opening elliptical, moderate in size (EL/HL 0.07), obliquely oriented; eye to ear distance greater than diameter of eye; rostral rectangular, divided dorsally by an inverted Y-shaped furrow, bordered posteriorly by left and right supranasals, and one medial postrostrals (=internasals), bordered laterally by first supralabials; external nares bordered anteriorly by rostral, dorsally by large supranasal and smaller postrostral, posteriorly by two postnasals, ventrally by first supralabial; 11(R, L) rectangular supralabials extending to just beyond upturn of labial margin, tapering abruptly below midpoint of eye; first supralabial largest; 7(R) 8(L) infralabials tapering in size posteriorly; scales of rostrum and lores weakly raised, larger than granular scales on top of head and occiput, those on posterior portion of canthus rostralis slightly larger; scales on occiput intermixed with small tubercles; posterior interorbital region tuberculate; large, boney frontal ridges bordering orbit confluent with boney, transverse, parietal ridge; dorsal superciliaries elongate, smooth, largest anteriorly; mental triangular, bordered laterally by first infralabials and posteriorly by left and right, rectangular postmentals which contact medially for 70% of their length; single row of slightly enlarged, elongate chinshields extending posteriorly to fourth infralabials; small, granular to flat gular scales grading posteriorly into larger, flat, smooth, imbricate, pectoral and ventral scales.
Body relatively short (AG/SVL 0.47) with well-defined, non-tuberculate, ventrolateral folds; dorsal scales small, granular, interspersed with low, regularly arranged, keeled tubercles, smaller intervening tubercles occasionally present; tubercles extend from top of head to caudal constriction and onto anterior one-fifth of tail; tubercles on occiput and nape small, those on body largest; approximately 22 longitudinal rows of tubercles at midbody; 44 paravertebral tubercles; 27 flat imbricate ventral scales between ventrolateral body folds; ventral scales larger than dorsal scales; precloacal scales large, smooth; deep precloacal groove.
Forelimbs moderate in stature, relatively short (FL/SVL 0.18); scales on dorsal surfaces of forelimbs, small, juxtaposed, intermixed with large tubercles in near contact with one another; scales of ventral surface of forearm flat, subimbricate, tubercles absent; palmar scales weakly rounded; digits well-developed, inflected at basal, interphalangeal joints; subdigital lamellae rectangular proximal to joint inflection, only slightly expanded distal to inflection; digits more narrow distal to joints; claws well-developed, sheathed by a dorsal and ventral scale; hind limbs more robust than forelimbs, moderate in length (TBL/SVL 0.20), larger tubercles on dorsal surface of legs separated by smaller subimbricate scales; ventral scales of thigh flat, smooth, imbricate, larger than dorsal granular scales; ventral, tibial scales flat, smooth, imbricate; single row of greatly enlarged, flat, rectangular, imbricate, femoroprecloacal scales extend nearly from knee to knee through precloacal region where they are continuous with enlarged, pore-bearing precloacal scales; 19 contiguous, pore-bearing precloacal scales forming an inverted T bearing a deep, precloacal groove in which six pore-bearing scales are found (three on left, three on right); postfemoral scales immediately posterior to enlarged scale row small, nearly granular, forming an abrupt union with postfemoral scales on posteroventral margin of thigh; plantar scales low, slightly raised; digits welldeveloped, inflected at basal, interphalangeal joints; subdigital lamellae proximal to joint inflection rectangular, only slightly expanded distal to inflection; digits more narrow distal to joints; claws well-developed, sheathed by a dorsal and ventral scale; 23(R) 22(L) subdigital lamellae on 4th toe.
Tail original 128.0 mm in length,
9.3 mm
in width at base, tapering to a point; dorsal scales of tail flat, squarish; subcaudal region bearing large median row of transverse scales; no caudal furrows; base of tail bearing hemipenial swellings; three small, postcloacal tubercles on each hemipenial swelling; postcloacal scales smooth, flat, large, imbricate.
Coloration in life.
Dorsal ground color of head, body, limbs, and tail light-brown, immaculate; no V-shaped line on rostrum; wide, dark-brown nuchal loop edged anteriorly and posteriorly by thin, white line bearing tubercles; four dark-brown body bands between nuchal loop and hind limb insertions edged anteriorly and posteriorly by thin white lines bearing tubercles; body bands as wide as interspaces; no markings on posterior margin of thigh; ventral surface of head, body, and limbs beige, immaculate except for black stipples in each scale; tail bearing eight dark bands separated by seven, narrower, beige (anteriorly) to white (posteriorly) bands; subcaudal region tan.
FIGURE 3.
Cyrtodactylus hidupselamanya
sp. nov.
from Felda Chiku 7, Kelantan, Peninsular Malaysia. Upper left: male paratype LSUHC12175. Upper right: female paratype LSUHC 12173. Lower left: hatchling paratype LSUHC 12177. Lower right: juvenile paratype LSUHC 12176.
Variation (
Figs. 3
,
4
).
The
paratypes
are remarkably similar to the
holotype
in overall coloration and pattern, likely due to substrate matching. The posterior section of the tail in the hatchling (LSUHC 12177) and the juvenile (LSUHC 12176) is whitish with faint bands—a condition found in the vast majority of cave-adapted
Cyrtodactylus
throughout Southeast Asia and all other limestone ecosystem adapted species in the
C. pulchellus
complex (Grismer
et al.
2012, 2014a). However, unlike all other of the latter, the white coloration remains into adulthood when unstressed (
Fig. 4
). Like other species in the
C. pulchellus
complex, hatchlings of
C. hidupselamanya
sp. nov.
bear bright-yellow dorsal interspaces (
Fig. 3
) that fade to brown in adulthood. Meristic and additional color pattern differences are listed in
Table 6
.
Distribution.
Cyrtodactylus hidupselamanya
sp. nov
is known only from the
type
locality at Felda Chiku 7, Kelantan, Peninsular
Malaysia
(
Fig. 1
). Another karst formation approximately
1 km
to the south was not surveyed. There are other isolated karst formations
5–10 km
away that were also not surveyed.
Etymology.
The specific epithet
hidupselamanya
is a modification of the Malay words “
hidup selamanya
” which, loosely translated means “live forever” and is in reference this species precarious future being that its limestone habitat is targeted to be completely quarried.
Natural history.
All specimens of
Cyrtodactylus hidupselamanya
sp. nov.
were collected at night between
2000 and 2400
hrs inside a complex network of caves and caverns permeating and coursing through an isolated karst formation (
Fig. 5
). A very narrow swath of undisturbed limestone forest closely surrounds the karst formation but the forest for several kilometers beyond this has been cleared for oil palm plantations (
Fig. 5
). Some lizards were collected in open areas on the limestone walls near cavern entrances while others were found on walls much deeper within the cave systems. All specimens were found between
1–4 m
above the cave floor. One specimen observed during the day at 1730 hrs inside the cave was taking refuge deep within a crack approximately
25 m
from the cave entrance. It is likely that
C. hidupselamanya
sp. nov.
ventures outside the caves at night to forage on the exterior walls of the karst formation although none were found. One juvenile (LSUHC 12176), however, was found on the limestone vegetation next to an exterior wall. Of the four adult females sampled (LSUHC 12159, 12162, 12173–74), none were gravid although one hatchling was collected (LSUHC 12177). This would suggest that
C. hidupselamanya
sp. nov.
does not breed year-round and that April is at the end of its reproductive season.
TABLE 6.
Characters and measurements of the type series of
Cyrtodactylus hidupselamanya
sp. nov.
from Felda Chiku 7, Kelantan, Peninsular Malaysia.M=male, F=female, /=data unavailable, R=regenerated, B=broken. Other abbreviations are listed in the Materials and Methods.
LSUHC
|
LSUHC
|
LSUHC
|
LSUHC
|
LSUHC
|
LSUHC
|
LSUHC
|
12173 |
12160 |
12158 |
12215 |
12161 |
12162 |
12163 |
paratype
|
paratype
|
paratype
|
paratype
|
paratype
|
paratype
|
holotype
|
sex |
F |
M |
M |
M |
M |
F |
M |
supralabials |
11 |
11 |
11 |
12 |
11 |
9 |
11 |
infralabials |
8 |
9 |
9 |
11 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
tuberculation weak, moderate, strong |
Weak |
Weak |
Weak |
Weak |
Weak |
Weak |
Weak |
tubercles on ventral surface of forelimbs tubercles in gular region |
No No |
No No |
No No |
No No |
No No |
No No |
No No |
ventrolateral fold tuberculate |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
no. of paravertebral tubercles |
48 |
41 |
39 |
42 |
40 |
47 |
44 |
no. longitudinal rows of tubercles |
22 |
21 |
24 |
20 |
21 |
21 |
22 |
tubercles on at least anterior 1/3 of tail |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
no |
no |
no. of ventral scales |
27 |
28 |
33 |
26 |
29 |
29 |
27 |
no. of subdigital lamellae on 4th toe |
23 |
22 |
24 |
22 |
23 |
22 |
22 |
no. of femoropreloacal pores |
/ |
20 |
21 |
22 |
17 |
/ |
19 |
deep precloacal groove in males body bands |
/ 4 |
Yes 4 |
Yes 4 |
Yes 4 |
Yes 4 |
/ 4 |
Yes 4 |
body band/interspace width ratio |
1.25 |
1.25 |
1.25 |
1.25 |
1.00 |
1.25 |
1.00 |
scattered white dorsal tubercles |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
no. bands on original tail |
8 |
/ |
/ |
9 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
posterior portion of tail white in adults immaculate white caudal bands in adults |
Yes Yes |
Yes Yes |
Yes Yes |
Yes Yes |
Yes Yes |
Yes Yes |
Yes Yes |
SVL |
96 |
92.8 |
102.0 |
102.7 |
83.3 |
100.1 |
97.5 |
TL |
122 |
117 |
80R |
/ |
112 |
127 |
128.0 |
TW |
7.6 |
8.3 |
9.5 |
8.5 |
7.1 |
7.9 |
9.3 |
FL |
16.8 |
17.1 |
17.9 |
17.8 |
15.6 |
17.2 |
17.2 |
TBL |
20.8 |
19.4 |
21.4 |
20.5 |
18.0 |
19.7 |
19.4 |
AG |
50.1 |
45.1 |
48.7 |
46.6 |
39.9 |
47.8 |
46.3 |
HL |
29.4 |
26.7 |
29.2 |
28.3 |
24.3 |
27.4 |
26.9 |
HW |
19.1 |
17.9 |
20.2 |
18.5 |
15.7 |
19.6 |
18.1 |
HD |
10.2 |
9.6 |
10.7 |
10.7 |
8.7 |
10.2 |
9.6 |
ED |
7.0 |
6.9 |
7.5 |
7.3 |
5.8 |
6.3 |
7.0 |
EE |
8.4 |
6.7 |
8.0 |
7.6 |
6.3 |
7.3 |
7.4 |
ES |
12.2 |
12.1 |
13.3 |
12.8 |
10.8 |
12.0 |
12.1 |
EN |
9.4 |
9.4 |
9.6 |
9.6 |
7.9 |
8.7 |
9.0 |
IO |
7.5 |
7.8 |
7.3 |
7.3 |
6.7 |
6.4 |
6.4 |
EL |
2.2 |
2.2 |
2.0 |
1.8 |
2.1 |
2.3 |
1.9 |
IN |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.1 |
3.2 |
3.0 |
2.8 |
2.8 |
……continued on the next page
TABLE 6.
(Continued)
LSUHC
|
LSUHC
|
LSUHC
|
LSUHC
|
LSUHC
|
LSUHC
|
LSUHC
|
12174 |
12165 |
12175 |
12159 |
12164 |
12176 |
12177 |
paratype
|
paratype
|
paratype
|
paratype
|
paratype
|
paratype
|
paratype
|
sex |
F |
M |
M |
F |
M |
F |
M |
supralabials |
10 |
12 |
12 |
11 |
10 |
12 |
10 |
infralabials |
9 |
8 |
9 |
9 |
10 |
8 |
9 |
tuberculation weak, moderate, strong |
Weak |
Weak |
Weak |
Weak |
Weak |
Weak |
Weak |
tubercles on ventral surface of forelimbs tubercles in gular region |
No No |
No No |
No No |
No No |
No No |
No No |
No No |
ventrolateral fold tuberculate |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
no. of paravertebral tubercles |
43 |
40 |
39 |
46 |
48 |
43 |
39 |
no. longitudinal rows of tubercles |
23 |
23 |
22 |
21 |
21 |
23 |
19 |
tubercles on at least anterior 1/3 of tail |
no |
no |
no |
no |
no |
no |
no |
no. of ventral scales |
28 |
27 |
28 |
27 |
28 |
27 |
27 |
no. of subdigital lamellae on 4th toe |
22 |
22 |
23 |
21 |
22 |
19 |
22 |
no. of femero-precloacal pores |
/ |
21 |
19 |
/ |
19 |
/ |
/ |
deep precloacal groove in males |
/ |
Yes |
Yes |
/ |
Yes |
/ |
Yes |
body bands |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
body band/interspace width ratio scattered white dorsal tubercles |
1.25 No |
1.25 No |
1.25 No |
1.00 No |
1.25 No |
1.25 No |
1.25 No |
no. bands on original tail |
10 |
10 |
8 |
N/A |
9 |
8 |
10 |
posterior portion of tail white in adults |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
immaculate white caudal bands in adults |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
SVL |
87.3 |
84.9 |
94.9 |
86.6 |
95.0 |
67.5 |
43.4 |
TL |
117 |
115 |
109 |
19B |
121 |
88 |
115 |
TW |
6.7 |
6.4 |
8.3 |
6.6 |
7.5 |
5.3 |
3.1 |
FL |
15.3 |
15.1 |
17.6 |
15.4 |
16.7 |
12.1 |
7.6 |
TBL |
17.9 |
17.3 |
19.7 |
17.9 |
19.2 |
13.4 |
8.7 |
AG |
42.9 |
39.7 |
47.9 |
40.0 |
45.2 |
32.3 |
19.3 |
HL |
24.8 |
25.0 |
26.7 |
24.5 |
27.1 |
19.4 |
13.5 |
HW |
16.2 |
16.2 |
16.8 |
16.1 |
17.2 |
12.4 |
8.4 |
HD |
8.9 |
8.7 |
10.8 |
8.9 |
10.3 |
7.3 |
5.3 |
ED |
5.5 |
5.9 |
5.7 |
5.5 |
6.3 |
4.7 |
2.9 |
EE |
6.5 |
6.3 |
7.1 |
6.2 |
7.1 |
4.8 |
2.9 |
ES |
11.3 |
10.6 |
11.5 |
10.4 |
11.8 |
8.2 |
5.4 |
EN |
8.5 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
8.1 |
9.2 |
6.2 |
4.0 |
IO |
5.5 |
5.5 |
5.4 |
5.5 |
5.7 |
5.2 |
3.1 |
EL |
2.4 |
1.7 |
1.1 |
1.7 |
1.7 |
1.3 |
1.1 |
IN |
2.6 |
2.7 |
2.9 |
2.3 |
3.0 |
2.2 |
1.3 |
FIGURE 4.
Type series of
Cyrtodactylus hidupselamanya
sp. nov.
from Felda Chiku 7, Kelantan, Peninsular Malaysia. Voucher numbers are in the LSUHC series. LSUHC 12163 is the holotype.
Lizards were quite common, generally unwary of our approach, and usually did not try to escape capture. We also noted that only two of
14 specimens
(14%) collected had regenerated tails. This would suggest that predation within the cave systems is not high. This is in contrast to other karst ecosystem species that utilize the surrounding limestone vegetation such
C. gunungsenyumensis
and
C. metropolis
.
Both species are far less numerous, extremely wary and difficult to catch, and have a high frequency of regenerated tails—nearly 100% in the former (
Grismer
et al.
2014c
;
2016
a).
Comparisons.
Cyrtodactylus hidupselamanya
sp. nov.
is differentiated from all other species of the
C. pulchellus
complex being that it is the only species with the exception of
C. jelawangensis
in which the posterior caudal region is whitish in adults. It is further differentiated from all other species by having a combination of weak tuberculation on body; no tubercles on the ventral surfaces of the forelimbs, on the gular region, or in the ventrolateral body folds; 19–23 longitudinal rows of dorsal tubercles; 39–48 paravertebral tubercles; 26–33 ventral scales; 19–24 subdigital lamellae on the fourth toes; no femoral pores but 17–22 precloacal pores; a deep precloacal groove; four body bands; body bands as wide or slightly wider than interspaces; body bands and nuchal loop edged with a thin white line bearing tubercles; no scattered white tubercles on the dorsum; 8–10 dark caudal bands on the original tail separated by immaculate (posteriorly) white caudal bands (
Table 5
). Within the
C. pulchellus
complex,
C. hidupselamanya
sp. nov.
is the sister species of
C. jelawangensis
but separated from it on the basis of having low and rounded as opposed to prominent tubercles; lacking as opposed to having tubercles on the ventral surfaces of the forelimbs; and having fewer rows of longitudinal dorsal tubercles (19–23 versus 23–25) (
Table 5
).
FIGURE 5.
Left: limestone forest habitat and karst tower of the type locality of
Cyrtodactylus hidupselamanya
sp. nov.
from Felda Chiku 7, Kelantan, Peninsular Malaysia. Right: Three dimensional Google Earth satellite image view of the karst formation encompassing the type locality illustrating its island-like nature being that it is surrounded by oil palm agriculture. White circles denote approximate collecting sites of the type series. Bottom: edge of the karst tower at the type locality.
Remarks.
The karst formation in which
Cyrtodactylus hidupselamanya
sp. nov.
occurs is scheduled to be completely quarried for its limestone and other raw materials by ASN Cement Sdn Bhd. From what we currently know about this species, this will result in its extinction.