A taxonomic monograph of the genus Solariola Flach, 1908 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Entiminae) Author Bello’, Cesare Author Osella, Giuseppe Author Baviera, Cosimo text Zootaxa 2019 2019-09-30 4676 1 1 261 journal article 25339 10.11646/zootaxa.4676.1.1 4ea5bf04-d609-4607-921f-701cdc5a2fd8 1175-5326 3468945 773A5C38-EDED-4C2F-9252-FE181C232E5A Key to species (14) of S. paganettii group 1. Pro–femora sub-dentate or dentate ( Figs. 30, 30e )........................................ S. paganettii ( Flach, 1905 ) 1’ Pro–femora edentate or clubbed.......................................................................... 2 2. Pronotum as long as wide (PL/PW ratio 1.00–1.04) ( Figs. 41, 41e ).............................. S. pentaphyllica sp.n. 2’ Pronotum more or less elongate (PL/PW ratio 1.08–1.20)...................................................... 3 3. Elytral punctures wider, deeper ( Figs. 34, 34a ). Rostrum with lots of pappolepida...................... .. S.comata sp.n. 3’ Elytral punctures more or less wide and deep. Rostrum with pappolepida......................................... 4 4. Large size (3.00– 3.90mm ). Elytral punctures spaced, small. ( Figs. 36–36c )......................... S.margaritae sp.n. 4’ Small to medium size ( 2.15–3.30mm ). Elytral punctures more or less spaced and wide.............................. 5 5. Elytra sub-oval to sides. Protibia longer and less robust ( Sicily )................................................. 6 5’ Elytra sub-parallel to sides. Protibia shorter and more robust. ( Calabria , S. rosae excluded).......................... 10 6. Elytral punctures deeper, wider. Interstriae more elevated ( Figs. 33–33c )..................... S. pesarinii Baviera, 2015 6’ Elytral punctures less deep or less wide. Interstriae less elevated or flat........................................... 7 7. Rostrum ratio: RL/RW 1.50–1.75. Slim antennae. ( Figs. 32–32e )........................ S. vitalei A. & F. Solari, 1923 7’ Rostrum ratio: RL/RW 1.28–1.33. Less slim antennae........................................................ 8 8. Elytral declivity>75 degrees. Rostral carinae sub-parallel to sides ( Figs. 42–42e )..................... S. raphaelis sp.n. 8’ Elytral declivity moderate (45 degrees). Carinae on rostrum divergent to sides..................................... 9 9. Pronotum sinuate to sides. Protibiae straight ( Figs. 39–39e )....................................... S. nemoralis sp.n. 9’ Pronotum rounded to sides. Protibiae slightly curved ( Figs. 35–35e )................................ S. gratiensis sp.n. 10. Elytral setae longer, semierect. Ratio: RL/RW 1.29–1.33 ( Figs. 43–43e ). ( Sicily )......................... S. rosae sp.n. 10’ Elytral setae less long, raised or recumbent. Rostrum ratio: RL/RW 1.34–1.56. ( Calabria )........................... 11 11. Elytra (EL/EW: 2.00–2.18) with long setae. SL/FL 0.63–0.67. ( Figs. 40–40e )............................ S. pacei sp.n. 11’ Elytra (EL/EW: 2.00–2.01) with more or less short setae. SL/FL 0.71–0.79....................................... 12 12. Pronotum (PL/PW ratio 1.10–1.20) with maximum width in the distal part. Rostrum ratio: RL/RW 1.43–1.50. ( Figs. 31–31e )........................................................................... S. hirtula (A. & F. Solari, 1923 ) 12’ Pronotum (PL/PW ratio 1.08–1.09) with maximum width in the basal half or at middle. Rostrum ratio: RL/RW 1.34–1.42... .................................................................................................. 13 13. Elytral punctures wide, deep. Pronotum with maximum width at middle. Protibiae short, robust. ( Figs. 37–37e )............................................................................................ S. mariaetheresiae sp.n. 13’ Elytral punctures small, less deep. Pronotum with maximum width in the basal half. Protibiae less short, less robust. ( Figs. 38–38e ).................................................................................. S. melonii sp.n.