Redescription of Enchodelus species studied by Thorne in 1939 (Dorylaimida: Nordiidae)
Author
Guerrero, Pablo
Departamento de Biología Animal, Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Universidad de Jaén, Campus ‘ Las Lagunillas’ s / n, Edificio B 3, 23071 - Jaén, Spain
Author
Santiago, Reyes Peña-
Departamento de Biología Animal, Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Universidad de Jaén, Campus ‘ Las Lagunillas’ s / n, Edificio B 3, 23071 - Jaén, Spain
text
Nematology
2007
2007-12-31
9
1
93
121
journal article
10.1163/156854107779969646
8111793
Enchodelus arcuatus
Thorne, 1939
(
Figs 2
,
3
)
MATERIAL
EXAMINED
Two
females
, one mounted onslide labelled
Enchodelus
arcus
, and collected from Arlington Farm,
Virginia
(
USA
) on
April 8, 1931
, in quite good condition.
Another
female
mounted on slide labelled
Enchodelus
arcus
, and collected from Granddaddy Lake,
Utah
(
USA
) in August, 1924, in poor condition.
Fig. 1.
Slides with original labels. A, B:
Enchodelus
arcuatus;
C:
E. brevidentatus;
D:
E. hopedorus;
E, F:
E. geraldi;
G, H:
E. macrodorus;
I, J:
E. striatus.
Fig. 2.
Enchodelus
arcuatus
Thorne, 1939
(female). A: Anterior region; B: Reconstruction of superficial appearance of cephalic region; C: Entire body; D: Vulval region; E: Pharyngeal region; F: Anterior genital branch; G: Tail. (Scale bars: A, B, D, G
=
25 µm; C
=
250 µm; E, F
= 100 µm.)
Fig. 3.
Enchodelus
arcuatus
Thorne, 1939
(female). A: Anterior region; B: Vulval region; C: Anterior genital branch; D: Posterior region; E: Expanded part of pharynx, showing dorsal nucleus (large arrow) and one of posterior subventral nuclei (small arrow). (Scale bars: A, B, D
=
25 µm; C, E
= 50 µm.)
MEASUREMENTS
See
Table 2
.
DESCRIPTION
Female
Moderately slender nematodes of medium size, 1.5,
2.0 mm long. Body cylindrical, tapering towards both ends but more so towards posterior. Cuticle 2.5, 3.5
µ
m thick at anterior region, 3.0, 4.0
µ
m at mid-body and 4.0, 6.0
µ
m at tail; its outer layer thinner than inner, with very fine transverse striations. Lateral chord 13
µ
m wide or
ca
one-fifth of mid-body diam., lacking any particular differentiation. Lateral pores obscure. Lip region rounded, offset by shallow constriction, 2.8, 3.0 times as broad as high and
ca
one-third of body diam. at neck base; lips practically amalgamated; perioral area weakly differentiated; labial and cephalic papillae hardly perceptible. Amphid fovea cup-shaped, opening at level of cephalic constriction and occupying almost two-thirds of corresponding body diam. Cheilostom a truncate cone, with no particular differentiation. Odontostyle slender, slightly dorsad curved; its length 10.9, 12.9 times as long as wide or 1.5, 1.6 times as long as lip region diam.; aperture small,
ca
one-tenth of total length. Odontophore rod-like, lacking any specialisation, 1.3, 1.4 times the odontostyle length long. Guiding ring apparently double, at 10.5-12.0
µ
m, or 0.9 times lip region diam., from anterior end. Pharynx consisting of a slender, but well muscled portion expanding gradually into basal expansion at 54, 58% of total neck length, reaching full diam. at 63, 67%; pharyngeal expansion occupying
ca
two-fifths (38, 42%) of total neck length, and
ca
three-fifths of corresponding body diam. Pharyngeal gland nuclei located as follows: DN = 70, 65; S
1
N
1
= 23; S
1
N
2
= 27; S
2
N
1
= 51, 48; S
2
N
2
= 53, 49. Base of pharyngeal expansion surrounded by a weakly refractive membrane-like structure. Cardia rounded conoid, practically as long as wide (8
µ
m). Intestine containing abundant green-coloured material, mainly in posterior portion. Genital system didelphic-amphidelphic, with both branches equally and well developed. Ovaries relatively large, 87-139
µ
m long, but not reaching sphincter level; oocytes first in two or more rows, then in one row. Oviduct 108-147
µ
m long or 1.6-2.4 times corresponding body diam., consisting of a slender portion with prismatic cells and a well developed
pars dilatata
with distinct lumen. Sphincter clearly visible between oviduct and uterus; a group of hyaline cells surrounding sphincter and distal part of uterus. Uterus bipartite,
i.e
., consisting of a wider proximal portion with distinct lumen, and a narrower distal part with narrow lumen and refractive inner lining, portion close to sphincter bearing very small refractive granules; uterus length 133-161
µ
m or 2.0-2.7 times body diam. at its level. Sperm not observed in genital tract. Uterine egg measuring 35, 38 × 80, 81
µ
m (n = 2).
Vagina
extending inwards to
ca
two-fifths of body diam.;
pars proximalis vaginae
11.5, 13.5 × 16.5, 15.0
µ
m, with almost straight walls and enveloped by moderately developed circular musculature;
pars refringens vaginae
with (in lateral view) two, rather close, trapezoidal sclerotisations that have a combined width of 12.0, 18.0
µ
m;
pars distalis vaginae
short, 2.5, 5.0
µ
m long. Vulva a transverse slit. Prerectum 2.1, 2.9; rectum 1.1, 1.2 anal body diam. long. Tail conical, regularly ventrad curved, with rounded tip; hyaline terminal portion 16, 23
µ
m or 26, 29% of total length. Two pairs of caudal pores at the middle of tail: one subdorsal, another practically lateral.
Table 2.
Morphometric data for
Enchodelus
arcuatus
Thorne, 1939
and
E. brevidentatus
Thorne, 1939
. All measurements are in µm (except Lin mm), and in the form: mean
± standard deviation (range).
Species |
Enchodelus
arcuatus
|
Enchodelus
brevidentatus
|
Population |
Arlington |
Granddaddy |
Lehi |
Wellsville |
Farm |
Lake |
(Utah) |
Hill |
(Virginia) |
(Utah) |
(Utah) |
Character |
Female |
Female |
Females |
Female |
n |
1 |
1 |
18 |
1 |
L |
1.50 |
1.99 |
1.73 ± 0.07 |
1.79 |
(1.61-1.86) |
a |
24.7 |
29.5 |
23.0 ± 1.9 |
35.6 |
(19.7-26.4) |
b |
5.2 |
5.9 |
6.1 ± 0.2 |
5.8 |
(5.7-6.5) |
c |
24.0 |
24.8 |
27.3 ± 2.3 |
25.3 |
(24.0-32.6) |
cļ |
2.0 |
2.2 |
1.7 ± 0.2 |
2.1 |
(1.3-2.1) |
V |
54.3 |
51.7 |
50.5 ± 1.8 |
50.5 |
(47.0-53.4) |
Lip region diam. |
12 |
14 |
13.0 ± 0.4 |
11.5 |
(12-13.5) |
Odontostyle length |
18.5 |
22 |
15.6 ± 0.6 |
16 |
(14.5-17) |
Odontophore length |
24 |
31 |
21.7 ± 0.9 |
21 |
(21-24) |
Guiding ring from |
10.5 |
12 |
9.6 ± 0.5 |
9 |
anterior end |
(8.5-10.5) |
Neck length |
287 |
340 |
286 ± 11 |
307 |
(264-308) |
Pharyngeal expansion |
108 |
142 |
105 ± 10 |
114 |
length |
(91-125) |
Diam. at neck base |
28 |
37 |
34.5 ± 2.5 |
26 |
(28-38) |
at midbody |
61 |
68 |
75.1 ± 6.1 |
50 |
(64-89) |
at anus |
32 |
36 |
38.8 ± 3.5 |
34 |
(33-48) |
Prerectum length |
67 |
107 |
85 ± 15 |
79 |
(66-120) |
Rectum length |
34 |
45 |
35.9 ± 2.2 |
31 |
(33-41) |
Tail length |
62 |
80 |
63.5 ± 4.5 |
71 |
(55-71) |
Male
Unknown.
DIAGNOSIS
Enchodelus
arcuatus
is distinguished by its body 1.5- 2.0 mm long, lip region 12-14
µ
m diam., odontostyle 18.5-22
µ
m long or 1.5-1.6 times the lip region diam., odontophore rod-like and 1.3-1.4 times the odontostyle, neck length 287-340
µ
m long, pharyngeal expansion 108- 142
µ
m or occupying
ca
two-fifths (38-42%) of total neck length, female genital system amphidelphic, uterus bipartite,
pars refringens vaginae
with two well developed trapezoid sclerotisations, vulva in form of a transverse slit and slightly posterior (V = 52-54), tail conical and regularly ventrad curved (62-80
µ
m, c = 24-25,
cļ
= 2.0- 2.2), and males unknown.
REMARKS
Thorne (1939)
provided measurements, description and illustrations of the female collected from Arlington Farm, and mentioned that he had studied another two females from Kailab Forest, Arizona, and three from Tryal Lake, Uinta Mountains, Utah. One of the two females examined here is, without doubt, that from Arlington Farm; another might be one of the three collected from Uinta Mountains.
After its original description,
E. arcuatus
was later reported from several habitats and localities.
Andrássy (1958)
studied one Bulgarian female having longer prerectum (4-5 ABD) and shorter tail (c = 35.9). Also
Andrássy (1959)
described one female from Romania having longer body (L = 2.2), more anterior vulva (V = 47) and shorter tail (c = 32.7,
cļ
= 1.8).
Zullini (1970)
reported fourteen females from Italy having a more anterior vulva (V = 49-52, n = 3) and shorter tail (c = 27-35, n = 3). Taking into account that the differences observed are morphometric and with no large gap among them, and that only a few specimens have hitherto been studied, it is tentatively assumed that these four records belong to the same species, although European material can be distinguished from that from America by a shorter tail.
On the other hand,
Vinciguerra and De Francisci (1973)
and
Vinciguerra and La Fauci (1978)
described two Italian populations characterised by a smaller body (L = 1.1-1.5, n = 18), shorter odontostyle (13-16
µ
m),
pars refringens vaginae
apparently absent (“la vagina... e la sua estremità prossimale è cuticolarizzata, ma non sclerificata”), and male as frequent as the female. This material is certainly not conspecific with those referred above.