Dolichopodidae (Diptera) from the Eocene amber deposits of Cambay and Kutch Basins, India Author BICKEL, DANIEL J. Author MARTIN, JOHN Author AGNIHOTRI, PRIYA Author SINGH, HUKAM text Palaeoentomology 2022 2022-09-22 5 5 475 486 http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.5.5.9 journal article 198283 10.11646/palaeoentomology.5.5.9 fc56c1d1-9557-4dde-82aa-f662522f44c7 2624-2834 7333779 898F94B1-C5A2-4E2B-AFC9-FFDF41DB93AF Order Diptera Linnaeus, 1758 Superfamily Empidoidea Latreille, 1804 Family Dolichopodidae Latreille, 1809 TABLE 1. Dolichopodidae in amber from the Cambay and Kutch Basins, Gujarat, India.
Inclusion # Collection Deposit Subfamily Genus species Notes Photo Figure
Tad-176 AMNH Tadkeshwar Diaphorinae x GIAM -008 2b
Tad-378 AMNH Tadkeshwar Diaphorinae x ♀, damaged none
Tad-65 AMNH Tadkeshwar Diaphorinae x x GIAM -003
Tad-177 AMNH Tadkeshwar Diaphorinae nr Chrysotus x GIAM -009 2c-d
Tad-481 AMNH Tadkeshwar Diaphorinae x x GIAM -015 2a
STB-0075-T12 BONN Tadkeshwar Diaphorinae ? x x ♂, obscured GIAM-019 2e-f
Tad-67 AMNH Tadkeshwar incertae sedis Gujaratmyia gen. nov. rotunda sp. nov. ♂ Holotype GIAM -002 4a-c
Tad-372 AMNH Tadkeshwar incertae sedis Rajpardia gen. nov. grimaldii sp. nov. ♂ Holotype+ other inclusions GIAM -013 4d-f
Tad-66 AMNH Tadkeshwar Medeterinae x x GIAM -001 4g
Tad-295 AMNH Tadkeshwar Medeterinae x x * damaged GIAM -010
Tad-271 AMNH Tadkeshwar Medeterinae x x *♀, obscured, Collembola none
Tad-401 AMNH Tadkeshwar Medeterinae x x ♀, obscured, dried out none
Tad-406 AMNH Tadkeshwar Medeterinae x x ♀, damaged, dred out none
Tad-447 AMNH Tadkeshwar Medeterinae x x ? obscured none
Tad-468 AMNH Tadkeshwar Medeterinae x x ♀, (=Tad-77?] none
Tad-498 AMNH Tadkeshwar Medeterinae x x ♀, damaged (=Tad- 27?) none
Um 12 AMNH Umarsar Medeterineae x x ♂, damaged GIAM- 020
Um 10 AMNH Umarsar Neurigoninae? x x ♀, partial specimen, damaged none
Tad-124 AMNH Tadkeshwar Peloropeodinae Palaeomedeterus Meunier cambayensis sp. nov. ♀ Paratype + Scelionidae GIAM -004
173A KU Tadkeshwar Peloropeodinae Palaeomedeterus Meunier cambayensis sp. nov. ♂ Paratype GIAM -011 3d
Tad-476-B AMNH Tadkeshwar Peloropeodinae Palaeomedeterus Meunier cambayensis sp. nov. ♂ Holotype GIAM -012 3a-b
Tad-476-A AMNH Tadkeshwar Peloropeodinae Palaeomedeterus Meunier cambayensis sp. nov. ♂ Paratype GIAM -014 3c
Tad-448 AMNH Tadkeshwar Peloropeodinae Palaeomedeterus Meunier cambayensis sp. nov. none
Tad-483 AMNH Tadkeshwar Peloropeodinae Palaeomedeterus Meunier cambayensis sp. nov. none
Tad-165 AMNH Tadkeshwar Peloropeodinae Palaeomedeterus Meunier cambayensis sp. nov. none
STB-306-T’09 BONN Tadkeshwar Peloropeodinae Palaeomedeterus Meunier cambayensis sp. nov. ♂, mostly obscured none
Val 71 AMNH Valia Peloropeodinae Palaeomedeterus Meunier sp. ♀, damaged none
Tad-475 AMNH Tadkeshwar Peloropeodinae Palaeomedeterus Meunier sp. 2 ♀?, ♀ Phoridae , damaged none
Val 72 AMNH Valia Peloropeodinae Palaeomedeterus Meunier sp. ♂, damaged none
Tad-359 AMNH Tadkeshwar Sympycninae x x ♀, obscured GIAM -018
Um - no number AMNH Umarsar Sympycninae x x ♂, damaged but visible GIAM- 021
Tad-486 AMNH Tadkeshwar Sympycninae x x ♀, damaged none
Val 74 AMNH Valia Sympycninae x x sex? damaged none
Tad-165 AMNH Tadkeshwar unknown x x ♂, male, missing head GIAM -007 5a-b
Tad-321b AMNH Tadkeshwar unknown x x GIAM -017
Tad-41b AMNH Tadkeshwar unknown x x ♀,? (badly damaged) none
STB-307-T’09 BONN Tadkeshwar unknown x x ♂, obscured none
FIGURE 2. Dolichopodidae undetermined. A , Left dorsal (GIAM - 015). Dolichopodidae undetermined. B , Male habitus, left dorsal (GIAM-008); Dolichopodidae : Diaphorinae , nr Chrysotus . C , Female head and thorax, anterior (GIAM - 009). D , Right ventral (GIAM - 009); Dolichopodidae undetermined. E , Male habitus, left lateral (GIAM-019). F , Hind legs and postabdomen (GIAM-019). The Dolichopodidae are one of five major lineages within the Diptera superfamily Empidoidea (for overviews of the family, see Bickel, 2009 and Grichanov & Brooks, 2017 ). Recently, the limits of the Dolichopodidae were expanded to include the Microphorinae and Parathalassiinae , both of which had been placed as subfamilies within the previously paraphyletic family Empididae ( Sinclair & Cumming, 2006 ) . This expanded concept of the Dolichopodidae is referred to as Dolichopodidae sensu lato ( i . e ., including the subfamilies Microphorinae and Parathalassiinae ) while the Dolichopodidae sensu stricto is equivalent to the more restricted traditional concept of Dolichopodidae . Both the Microphorinae and Parathalassiinae have plesiomorphic wing, antennal, and male postabdominal characters with respect to the Dolichopodidae s . s . and have a much longer fossil record. These two subfamilies appear to have been diverse in both Cretaceous and Baltic amber ( Cumming & Brooks, 2019 ; Shamshev & Perkovsky, 2022 ). By comparison, Dolichopodidae s . s . do not appear in the fossil record before the Paleogene period (a species described as lower Cretaceous Lebanon amber was apparently mislabeled and is from Baltic amber, see Appendix). What is remarkable here is that by the Eocene the Dolichopodidae s . s . show a high level of taxonomic diversity, with most modern subfamilies in place, and the family is abundant in many Cenozoic ambers ( e . g ., Baltic, Dominican and Mexican). This apparent rapid radiation is supported by molecular evidence, where mitochondrial and nuclear markers suggest a rapid differentiation of the subfamilies. Lim et al . (2010) found that genera that were difficult to place into subfamilies based on morphological characters were also difficult to place using molecular data.