A new fossil euphorine genus and species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) with the longest known ovipositor from Dominican amber Author Belokobylskij, Sergey A. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3646-3459 Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St Petersburg 199034, Russia Author Hovorka, Tomas https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6887-2644 Department of Entomology, National Museum, Cirkusova 1740, Prague 19300, Czech Republic & Department of Zoology, Charles University, Vinicna 1594, Prague 12800, Czech Republic hovorkarl@gmail.com text Journal of Hymenoptera Research 2022 2022-10-31 93 71 80 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90545 journal article http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90545 1314-2607-93-71 20468409903248A8948F3EFD0EF2C5C9 66DB58BE598E546D9E0F151426EEB5E8 Genus Palaeorionis gen. nov. Figs 1 , 2 Type species. Palaeorionis longicaudis gen. et sp. nov., by present designation and monotypy. Etymology. Named after "palaeo" (Greek for "ancient" ) and the generic name of its similar extant genus, Orionis , which belongs to the subfamily Euphorinae . Gender: masculine. Description. Head (Fig. 1B, C ) weakly transverse. Ocelli rather large and distinctly convex. Frons weakly convex. Eyes large, elongate-oval, glabrous. Face distinctly convex. Malar space very short; malar suture perhaps absent. Clypeus complete, distinctly convex (lateral view); hypoclypeal depression absent. Occipital carina distinct laterally, perhaps widely interrupted dorsally (Fig. 1B ). Mandibles relatively small. Maxillary palpus very long (Fig. 1C ), perhaps 6-segmented (medial segments hidden by mesosoma), its apical segment very long and slender, almost 25.0 times longer than its maximum width. Labial palpus short, with 4 segments, third segment very small, tiny, subglobular; apical (fourth) segment longest, knife-shaped, narrowed towards apex. Figure 1. Palaeorionis longicaudis gen. et sp. nov. (holotype, female) A habitus, lateral view B head, latero-posterior view C head, antenna and mesosoma, lateral view D mesosoma without propodeum, lateral view E propodeum, lateral view F hind coxa G wings. Antenna (Fig. 1A, C ) long, slender, filiform, about 33-segmented. Scapus rather short and wide. Pedicel relatively small. First flagellar segment subcylindrical, without any transformations, much longer than its apical width, about as long as second segment. Apical segment pointed apically, but without spine. Mesosoma (Fig. 1C, D, E ). Sides of pronotum rugose upper and areolate below. Mesoscutum perhaps smooth, narrowly reticulate laterally. Notauli present, perhaps almost complete and shallow especially posteriorly. Scutellum distinctly convex. Prepectal carina present, sharp and distinct. Mesopleuron mainly smooth. Precoxal sulcus present, long, not deep, curved, distinctly crenulate-reticulate. Metascutum without dorsal tooth (lateral view). Propodeum dorsally almost straight in basal two-thirds, distinctly oblique sloped, starting from basal third, without lateral tubercles (in lateral view). Wings (Fig. 1G ). Fore wing rather narrow, pterostigma long and rather narrow. Radial (marginal) cell weakly shortened, narrow, about 4.5 times longer than its maximum width. Metacarpus (1-R1) 1.2 times longer than pterostigma. First medial abscissa (1-SR+M) present and curved. Present both radiomedial veins (2-SR and r-m). Second radiomedial (submarginal) cell short, pentagonal. Discoidal (first discal) cell not petiolate anteriorly, sessile. Recurrent vein (m-cu) postfurcal, subparallel to basal vein (1-M). First mediocubital vein (M+CU1) well sclerotised and distinctly sinuate. Nervulus (cu-a) postfurcal. Brachial (first subdiscal) cell open posteriorly; brachial vein (CU1b) absent. Transverse anal veins (1a and 2a) absent. Hind wing. Submedial (subbasal) cell short. First abscissa of mediocubital vein (M+CU) distinctly shorter than second abscissa (1-M). Legs (Fig. 1A, F ) slender and very long. Hind coxa elongate, without ventro-basal tubercle, as long as propodeum. Hind femur long and slender, 0.8 times as long as hind tibia. Hind tibia narrow basally, distinctly widened in apical 0.8. Hind tibial spurs relatively short, 0.3 times as long as hind basitarsus. Hind basitarsus about 0.8 times as long as second-fifth segments combined. Tarsal claw small and simple. Metasoma (Figs 1A , 2 ) elongate, compressed behind petiole, entirely smooth, segments behind third one distinctly exposed posteriorly. First metasomal tergite very narrow entirely, fused ventrally almost entirely, tubular, smooth dorsally, with spiracles situated behind middle of petiole, without dorsope and laterope; 0.6 times as long as mesosoma and metasoma behind petiole. Suture between second and third tergites absent. Laterotergites (epipleura) of all segments not separated. Ovipositor long, weakly curved, compressed basally. Ovipositor sheath 1.2 times longer than the body length, almost twice longer than mesosoma, 1.1 times longer than fore wing (Fig. 1A ). Comparative diagnosis. Palaeorionis gen nov. is characterised by a long and tube-like petiole resembling a similar structure in some extant Euphorinae genera, especially Aridelus Marshall, 1887, Chrysopophthorus Goidanich, 1948, Orionis Shaw, 1987, Stenothremma Shaw, 1984, and Wesmaelia Foerster, 1863. Palaeorionis gen. nov. differs from Orionis Shaw by having the last segment of the maxillary palpus very long and narrow (shorter and thicker in Orionis ), discoidal (discal) cell of infuscate fore wing sessile (petiolate in hyaline fore wing in Orionis ), second radiomedial vein (r-m) present (absent in Orionis ), mediocubital vein (M+CU1) sinuate (straight in Orionis ), brachial (subdiscal) cell long and rather narrow (short and wide in Orionis ), petiole of metasoma smooth and without any carinae (at least partly sculptured and with lateral carinae in Orionis ), and ovipositor sheath longer than metasoma (distinctly shorter in Orionis ). Palaeorionis gen nov. differs from Aridelus Marshall by having the last segment of maxillary palpus very long and narrow (shorter and thicker in Aridelus ), mesosoma relatively long (short in Aridelus ), hind coxa distinctly elongate-oval (shortly oval in Aridelus ), mesosoma without areolate sculpture (entirely areolate in Aridelus ), mediocubital vein (M+CU1) of fore wing sinuate (straight in Aridelus ), hind femur relatively wide (narrow in Aridelus ), metasoma rather compressed and with distinctly exposed apical segments (not compressed and retracted apical segments as in Aridelus ), and ovipositor sheath longer than metasoma (very short and usually concealed inside of the metasoma in Aridelus ). The newly described genus also differs from Stenothremma Shaw by the last segment of the maxillary palpus very long and narrow (shorter and thicker in Stenothremma ), mesosoma relatively long (short in Stenothremma ), hind coxa distinctly elongate-oval (subglobal in Stenothremma ), body without granulate sculpture (head, mesosoma and petiole densely granulate in Stenothremma ), discoidal (discal) cell of infuscate fore wing sessile (petiolate in hyaline fore wing in Stenothremma ), second radiomedial vein (r-m) present (often absent in Stenothremma ), mediocubital vein (M+CU1) sinuate (straight in Stenothremma ), brachial (subdiscal) cell long and rather narrow (short and wide in Stenothremma ), petiole of metasoma smooth (petiole mainly granulate in Stenothremma ), and ovipositor sheath longer than metasoma (distinctly shorter in Stenothremma ). The differences from the extant genera Wesmaelia and Orionis are summarized in Table 1 . Table 1. The differences between the Palaeorionis gen nov. and two similar recent genera ( Wesmaelia Foerster and Chrysopophthorus Goidanich).

Genus	Palaeorionis gen. nov.	Wesmaelia	Chrysopophthorus
Character
1. Last segment of the maxillary palpus	very long and narrow	shorter and thicker	shorter and thicker
2. Pedicel of antenna	distinctly enlarged, more than half as long as scape	short, much less than half of the length of scape	distinctly enlarged, about half as long as scape
3. Mesosoma	relatively long	short	short
4. Colour of fore wing	infuscate	hyaline	hyaline
5. Second radiomedial vein (r-m) of fore wing	present	absent	present
6. Mediocubital vein (M+CU1) of fore wing	sinuate	straight	straight
7. Discoidal (discal) cell of fore wing	sessile	petiolate	petiolate
8. Hind coxa	distinctly elongate-oval	weakly oval	weakly oval
9. Hind femur	widened	narrow	narrow
10. Metasoma	rather compressed and with distinctly exposed apical segments	not compressed and with retracted apical segments	not compressed and with retracted apical segments
11. Ovipositor sheath	longer than metasoma	very short and usually concealed inside of metasoma	distinctly shorter than metasoma

Between the known fossil Euphorinae genera, Palaeorionis gen nov. is similar to Onychoura Brues, 1933 (with type species O. petiolata Brues, 1933) and Meteorites Brues, 1939 (with type species M. inopinata Brues, 1939), both from Baltic amber. This new genus differs from Onychoura by having malar area short (very long in Onychoura ), mesosoma relatively elongated (very short in Onychoura ), notauli present (perhaps absent in Onychoura ), propodeum long (very short in Onychoura ), radial (marginal) cell of fore wing weakly shortened (strongly shortened in Onychoura ), recurrent vein (m-cu) distinctly postfurcal (interstitial in Onychoura ), petiole of metasoma not swollen (swollen in Onychoura ), and ovipositor longer than metasoma and without apical hook (distinctly shorter and with very slender apical hook in Onychoura ). Palaeorionis gen nov. distinctly differs from Meteorites Brues by the last segment of maxillary palpus very long and narrow (much shorter and thicker in Meteorites ), antenna long, about 33-segmented (short, 13-14-segmented in Meteorites ), mesosoma relatively long, about twice longer than height (short, about as long as height in Meteorites ), second radiomedial vein (r-m) of fore wing present (absent in Meteorites ), nervulus (cu-a) and recurrent (m-cu) veins distinctly postfurcal (almost interstitial in Meteorites ), petiole of metasoma not widened distally and almost straight (widened distally and distinct evenly curved in Meteorites ), and ovipositor longer than metasoma and almost straight (distinctly shorter and strongly arcuate in Meteorites ).