Typification of Fritillaria tubiformis Gren. & Godr., Fritillaria delphinensis f. moggridgei Planch. and Fritillaria delphinensis var. burnatii Planch. (Liliaceae) from SW Europe Author Bartolucci, Fabrizio Centro Ricerche Floristiche dell’Appennino (Parco Nazionale del Gran Sasso-Monti della Laga – Dipartimento di scienze Ambientali dell’ Università di Camerino), San Colombo, I- 67021, Barisciano (L’Aquila), Italy. fabrizio.bartolucci@gmail.com Author Peruzzi, Lorenzo Dipartimento di Biologia, Unità di Botanica generale e sistematica, Università di Pisa, I- 56126, Pisa, Italy. text Candollea 2012 2012-07-01 67 1 23 29 journal article 3461 10.15553/c2012v671a2 d1407171-9323-4a91-a1ec-b83b56fd8d2c 2235-3658 5708582 1. Fritillaria tubiformis Gren. & Godr. in Mém. Soc. Emul. Doubs ser. 2, 6: 13. 1855 . Fritillaria delphinensis Gren. in Gren. & Godr. , Fl. France 3: 180. 1855 , nom. illeg. Lectotypus (here designated): FRANCE . Hautes Alpes : Lusette en Luz (Drome), 1847, Boullu s.n. ( P! ex Herb. Grenier sub F. meleagris , rev. F. alpicola ) ( Fig. 1 ) . Syntypi . FRANCE . Hautes Alpes : Mt. Seuse pres Gap, VIII.1847 , Verlot s.n. ( P! ex Herb. Grenier, sub F. meleagris , rev. F. alpicola ); Mt. Séuse près Gap, 1854, Grenier s.n. ( K! ) . GRENIER & GODRON (1855) quote several syntypes for this taxon. From the localities cited in the protologue, we traced, in P and K, specimens that can be considered as original material. Among these we choose the most well-developed and well-presented as lectotype. Taxonomic discussion . – Fritillaria tubiformis was long confused with F. meleagris L. (i.e., BERTOLONI, 1839 ), but it is clearly distinct from all other species from West Europe RENIER & GODRON, 1855 ). On the other hand, it seems close to F. latifolia Willd. , widespread from Caucasus to N Turkey IX, 2001 ), from which it differs in having glaucous leaves (vs. shiny green) and shorter style branches. Among the taxa usually synonymized with F. tubiformis , two seem to deserve special attention ( F. delphinensis var. burnatii Planch. and F. delphinensis f. moggridgei Planch. ), while others have doubtful taxonomic value (i.e., F. delphinensis var. reverchonii Rouy ; ROUY, 1910 ). Similarly to what was done recently with the F. montana W. D. J. Koch complex ( BARTOLUCCI & al., 2009 ; PERUZZI & al., 2009 ; PERUZZI & BARTOLUCCI, 2009 ), a biosystematic study is in progress about the F. meleagris L. complex ( F. meleagris s.l. and F. tubiformis s.l. ), aiming to clarify the relationships among the taxa and their distribution.