Revision of the Lithoglyptidae sensu Tomlinson, 1969 and Lithoglyptes Aurivillius, 1892 (Cirripedia, Acrothoracica,), including a new species from Bermuda
Author
Kolbasov, Gregory A.
Department of Invertebrate Zoology (White Sea Biological Station), Biological Faculty, Moscow State University, Moscow 119899, Russia, e-mail: kolbasov @ soil. msu. ru Marine Biological Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA 92093 - 0202, USA, e-mail: wnewman @ ucsd. edu
Author
Newman, William A.
text
Zootaxa
2005
2005-06-30
1013
1
35
64
https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1013.1.3
journal article
10.11646/zootaxa.1013.1.3
11755334
5049212
09072535-2701-4A27-AA94-0159EBE871E9
Armatoglyptes thomasi
sp. n.
Figs. 7
,
8
Diagnosis. An
Armatoglyptes
having an indistinct orificial knob lacking armament but without lateral bars, opercular bars supporting a pair of welldeveloped recurved posterior projections and a pair of small armed elevations at approximately 1/3 back along the length of the aperture, and a mandible with a comb of sharp spines along the lower half of the cutting edge.
Material: Three females with three dwarf males (one on
holotype
and two on one of the
paratypes
). The
holotype
and a
paratype
were boiled in KOH for light microscopy investigations. The dissected
holotype
(
Fig. 7
) and the
paratype
(
Fig. 8 A, B
), together with dwarf males, are deposited in the Zoological Museum of Moscow State University (no. Mg 1213). From the undersides of limestone slabs from seaward lips and cup reef rims, up to
3 m
depth, 2.4 km north of East Blue Cut,
Bermuda
,
July 1988
, Dr. M.L.H. Thomas (University of New Brunswick) collector. Accompanied on slabs by an occasional specimen of the largely insular species
Catophragmus imbricatus
and
Tesseropora atlantica
, and other attached organisms (
Thomas & Stevens 1991
), and by
Auritoglyptes bicornis
(
Aurivillius, 1892
)
(herein).
Etymology. Named in the honor of Dr. M.L.H. Thomas who discovered the new species and, upon the advice of Dr. Wolfgang Sterrer, provided us with material from
Bermuda
.
Description: Female.
Holotype
(
Fig. 7 A
): 1.5 1.0 mm, aperture 0.5 mm long from anterior end of opercular bars to posterior end of comb collar, colour offwhite in alcohol. Opercular bars (
Fig. 7 B, C
) approximately 0.38 mm long, 1) equipped with several bifid teeth and simple setae, 2) a pair of small elevations (hillocks), about 1/3 the length from the anterior end, bearing one or two bifid teeth at their tops which are slightly larger than the surrounding bifid teeth, 3) a pair of welldeveloped, recurved (anteriorly bent) posterior processes having small bifid teeth and simple setae long their lengths but only simple teeth at their tips, 4) followed by a long, typical comb collar and 5) scattered setae and bifid teeth at the posterior end of the aperture.
Lateral surfaces of opercular area sparsely covered with short setae among a dense covering of prominent multifid scales, discernible as fine striations and sparse short setae under light microscopy. Lateral bars absent but a feeble apertural reinforcing bar arises from the anterior end of the opercular bars. The orificial knob lacks setae, teeth and denticles, but has a strongly wrinkled cuticle that appears as a densely striated area (
Fig. 7 A, B
). The region between the knob and the attachment disk is approximately three times its length and also appears densely striated (
Fig. 7 A
). The remainder of the mantle, except for a few scattered teeth along the “carinal” margin, lacks armament. The attachment disk is composed of successive layers of striated cuticle, but whether or not it was calcified is unknown.
FIGURE 8
.
Armatoglyptes thomasi
gen. et sp. nov.
, A, B (paratype): C, D dwarf males. A mandible; B maxillule; C, D dwarf males, general view. Scale bars in µm.
The mouthparts are surrounded by a typical saddleshaped labrum. The mandibles (
Fig. 7 D, E
;
8 A
) support three teeth along the upper half and a comb of 9–12 sharp spines along the lower half of the cutting edge, several long setae at upper and lower margins, and numerous small setae on the surface of the blade. Mandibular palps characteristic of lithoglyptids, with trapezoid distal parts bearing long, smooth setae (
Fig. 7 F
). Superior angle of maxillules (
Fig. 7 G
;
8 B
) with three curved spinelike setae, the upper two longer than the lower one, followed by a notch without spines and an inferior angle supporting a row of small spines; surfaces of blade distally setose, upper setae are longest, with several small setae united into ctenoid scales. Maxillae (
Fig. 7 H
) are typical of lithoglyptids, triangular, with long setae at the tip and smaller setae scattered on the anterior side and along inner margin.
Mouth or first cirri (maxillipeds) (
Fig. 7 I
) consist of a long, curved coxa and a quadrangular basis supporting two rami with indistinct segmentation; the anterior ramus perhaps originally threesegmented and almost twice as long as the apparently two segmented posterior ramus, rami bearing numerous long setae. The four pairs of terminal cirri, and the caudal appendages with the proximal and distal segments bearing onetwo setae and four setae respectively (
Fig. 7 J
), are typical for the genus.
The simple dwarf males (
Fig. 7 A
;
8 C, D
) were attached to the side of the female near or on the side of the attachment disk. Their pear or gourdshaped mantle measures
200– 400 µm
long, with an elongated, bent, distal end covered by dense annular striations and bearing a distinct apertural slit.
Affinities. The new species,
Armatoglyptes thomasi
from
Bermuda
, is similar to
A. habei
(
Tomlinson, 1963
)
from
Japan
,
A. wilsoni
(
Tomlinson, 1969
)
from Koror and
Wake
I., and
A. stirni
(
Turquier, 1987
)
from the E. Atlantic in having opercular bars with a pair of large, recurved (anteriorly hooked) posterior projections. The new species is also similar to
A. echinoideus
(
Kolbasov, 2000f
)
from
Nauru
I. in having a strongly wrinkled cuticle of the orificial knob area, but the latter can be easily be distinguished by the heavy hooked spines found on the posterior projections of its opercular bars. The new species also differs from
A. habei
in having an unarmed orificial knob and in lacking lateral bars.
Armatoglyptes wilsoni
and
A. stirni
also lack these features, but the Koror population of the former has a small elevation supporting a strong bifid tooth about 1/3 the length of each opercular bar from the attachment area, and similar elevations are seen in
A. thomasi
. The mandible in
A. wilsoni
is described as having the upper half of the cutting edge supporting three blunt cusps rather than sharp teeth, and the lower half bearing many tubercles rather that a comb of sharp spines, and the maxillules have two rather than three curved spines at the superior angle (
Tomlinson 1969
), features that clearly separate it from
A. thomasi
. The two also have markedly different distributions,
A. wilsoni
being known from the IndoWest Pacific whereas
A. thomasi
is known only from
Bermuda
.
This leaves
A. stirni
on the eastern side of the Atlantic (near
Gibraltar
) and, therefore, evidently geographically the closest relative of
A. thomasi
. However, it generally has the hooked tips of the posterior opercular bar projections bifid rather than simple, and there is no elevation between them and the anterior ends of the opercular bars as there is in
A. wilsoni
and
A. thomasi
. In addition, the mandible of
A. stirni
has denticles between the second and third teeth and a thick and short rather than a long comb of relatively long, thin spines between the third tooth and the inferior angle, which further distinguish it from
A. thomasi
. Furthermore,
A. stirni
differs from both
A. wilsoni
and
A. thomasi
in having the basis of the first or mouth cirrus longer than wide and the anterior and posterior rami perhaps three and clearly four segmented respectively. Thus, while all these species are more or less closely related,
A. thomasi
is apparently closer to the IndoW. Pacific forms, particularly
A. wilsoni
form Koror, than it is to
A. stirni
from the E. Atlantic.