Revision of the genus Clathrina (Porifera, Calcarea)
Author
Klautau, Michelle
Author
Valentine, Clare
text
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
2003
2003-09-30
139
1
1
62
https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article-lookup/doi/10.1046/j.0024-4082.2003.00063.x
journal article
10.1046/j.0024-4082.2003.00063.x
0024-4082
5432634
CLATHRINA CONIFERA
KLAUTAU & BOROJEVIC, 2001
Type
locality:
Arraial do Cabo
,
Rio de Janeiro
,
Brazil
.
Type:
BMNH 1999.9
.16.19 (
holotype
/alcohol).
Arraial do Cabo
(Anjos Beach),
Rio de Janeiro
,
Brazil
. Collected by
G. Muricy
(
15 November 1987
)
.
Citations:
Klautau
et al
. (1994)
(as
C. primordialis
).
Colour:
Cormus of preserved specimen is white.
Description:
Specimens of this species are very similar to those of
C. cylindractina
, and can easily be mistaken for them. The massive, yet delicate, cormus is formed of large, irregular and loosely anastomosed tubes and oscula are spread throughout. No water-collecting tubes are present. The cormus comprises a few tubes spread on rocks when the sponge is still very young.
The skeleton has no special organization and comprises only one kind of spicule, the triactine. Triactines are equiangular and equiradiate and their actines are straight and conical, with blunt tips (
Fig. 13B
).
C. conifera
is sciaphilous, being frequently found under rocks or other animals, such as other sponges, tunicates and soft corals.
Figure 13.
Clathrina conifera
. Triactines. Scale bar = 100 Mm.
Length (Mm) |
Width (Mm) |
min |
mean |
s |
max |
mean |
s |
n
|
Triactines |
62.5 |
77.3 |
± 9.3 |
97.5 |
9.0 |
± 1.0 |
30 |
Remarks:
This species, which we now call
C. conifera
, was first described in a previous article (
Klautau
et al
., 1994
) as
C. primordialis
(
Haeckel, 1872
)
. In his description, Haeckel did not give the type locality of this species, but mentioned several places at which it was found, including
Rio de Janeiro
. As he had not elected a
holotype
, and as the
syntypes
seemed to have disappeared, we have selected the specimen from Arraial do
Cabo
matching his description as the
neotype
of
C. primordialis
, and suggest that
Rio de Janeiro
should become the
locus typicus
of this species.
However, for the current work, we did manage to locate a
syntype
of
C. primordialis
in
PMJ
. It was collected from
Lesina (Adriatic)
, which means that the type locality of this species should be considered as Lesina and not
Rio de Janeiro
. Although there are similarities between the description given by Haeckel and the specimens from Arraial do
Cabo
, we decided not to consider our specimens as
C. primordialis
. These morphologically simple species of
Clathrina
seem to be a complex of species that should be split into new species.
Considering our previous results with
Clathrina
populations from the Mediterranean and from the Atlantic, we name the specimens from Arraial do
Cabo
with conical actines as
C. conifera
, to distinguish the species from its sibling
C. primordialis
from the Adriatic Sea.
Besides similarities with
C. primordialis
,
C. conifera
is also morphologically similar to
C. cylindractina
, another species from Arraial do
Cabo
. However, they can be distinguished by the size and shape of their actines:
C. cylindractina
has larger spicules than
C. conifera
. However, the most important morphological difference between them relates to the shape of their actines. In
C. cylindractina
, the actines are cylindrical or only slightly conical, while in
C. conifera
they are markedly conical.
Length (Mm) |
Width (Mm) |
min |
mean |
s |
max |
mean |
s |
n
|
Triactines |
67.5 |
87.3 |
± 9.5 |
102.5 |
10.0 |
± 0.5 |
25 |
Tetractines |
72.5 |
94.5 |
± 9.8 |
115.0 |
9.8 |
± 1.0 |
30 |
Apical actine |
32.5 |
81.8 |
± 39.5 |
155.0 |
5.0 |
± 1.3 |
30 |
Diactines |
173.4 |
503.9 |
± 145.9 |
816.0 |
31.6 |
± 8.2 |
30 |
Both populations have already been subjected to allozyme analysis (
Klautau
et al
., 1994
) and, although living in sympatry, it was confirmed that no gene flow occurs between them, indicating that they are distinct species.