Systematic revision of the Malagasy chameleons Calumma boettgeri and C. linotum (Squamata: Chamaeleonidae)
Author
Prötzel, David
Author
Ruthensteiner, Bernhard
Author
Scherz, Mark D.
Author
Glaw, Frank
text
Zootaxa
2015
4048
2
211
231
journal article
10.11646/zootaxa.4048.2.4
2bc19ab1-a510-408b-8fc3-e526ee3dc59a
1175-5326
233651
2CAB0746-175E-4FE1-B0D0-23DFF395A559
Morphology of
Calumma boettgeri
sensu lato
External morphology
. Measurements of important morphological parameters were taken from
23 specimens
(
11 males
,
12 females
) from
Nosy
Be, six specimens (five males, one female) from Montagne d’Ambre, and another nine specimens without exact locality data (
Table 1
). Because there was only one female from Montagne d’Ambre available, only males from both species were considered for comparison of body size, extremities and appendages. The specimens without localities were not included in mean value calculations but could be assigned according to their morphology to the
Nosy
Be morphotype (four specimens) and the Montagne d’Ambre morphotype (five specimens), respectively.
TABLE 1
. Morphological measurements of
Calumma boettgeri
and
C. linotum
.
Abbreviations: m, male; f, female; SVL, snout-vent length; TaL, tail length; TL, total length;
, ratio of tail to snout-vent length; LRA, length of rostral appendage from snout tip; RRS, ratio of length of rostral appendage and snout-vent length; RAPSC, number of peripheral scales on rostral appendage; NPSCM, number of peripheral scales per mm on rostral appendage; RC, rostral crest present (+) or absent (-); NSL, number of supralabials; NIL, number of infralabials; OLD, lateral diameter of the occipital lobe; OLN, depth of the dorsal notch in occipital lobe; PC, parietal crest absent (-) or number of parietal cones; DC, dorsal crest absent (-) or number of dorsal cones; AP, axillary pits present (+) or absent (-); DSC, diameter of broadest scale on upper arm; RSB, ratio of broadest scale to snout-vent length; NSC, number of big scales on upper arm from lateral view; UAD, upper arm diameter; RAS, ratio of arm diameter to snout-vent length; all measurements in mm.
collection no.
|
species
|
locality
|
sex
|
SVL
|
TaL
|
TL
|
RST
|
LRA
|
RRS
|
RAPSC
|
NPSCM
|
RC
|
NSL
|
ZFMK 51389 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
51.5 |
51.8 |
103.4 |
0.99 |
4.0 |
0.077 |
26 |
6.5 |
+ |
12 |
ZFMK 51520 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
50.7 |
54.2 |
104.9 |
0.94 |
3.0 |
0.060 |
21 |
7.0 |
+ |
13 |
ZFMK 45987 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
51.6 |
52.8 |
104.4 |
0.98 |
2.6 |
0.051 |
13 |
4.9 |
+ |
11 |
ZFMK 45988 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
49.9 |
54.4 |
104.3 |
0.92 |
3.1 |
0.062 |
18 |
5.8 |
+ |
12 |
ZFMK 51518 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
46.0 |
45.5 |
91.4 |
1.01 |
2.6 |
0.057 |
17 |
6.5 |
+ |
12 |
ZFMK 51519 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
50.7 |
50.2 |
100.9 |
1.01 |
3.2 |
0.062 |
26 |
8.3 |
+ |
12 |
ZFMK 51521 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
41.1 |
45.8 |
86.9 |
0.90 |
4.1 |
0.100 |
22 |
5.4 |
+ |
12 |
ZSM 36/1913 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
41.4 |
44.0 |
85.4 |
0.94 |
2.5 |
0.059 |
15 |
6.1 |
+ |
12 |
ZSM 440/2000 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
50.1 |
54.1 |
104.2 |
0.93 |
3.0 |
0.060 |
14 |
4.6 |
+ |
12 |
ZSM 444/2000 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
51.9 |
55.0 |
106.9 |
0.94 |
2.9 |
0.057 |
17 |
5.8 |
+ |
12 |
SMF 16471 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
50.3 |
54.3 |
104.6 |
0.93 |
3.6 |
0.072 |
15 |
3.6 |
+ |
13 |
ZFMK 51514 |
C. boettgeri
|
- |
m |
49.4 |
51.2 |
100.6 |
0.96 |
3.5 |
0.072 |
17 |
4.8 |
+ |
13 |
ZSM 866/1920 |
C. boettgeri
|
- |
m |
54.6 |
55.7 |
110.3 |
0.98 |
3.6 |
0.065 |
17 |
4.8 |
+ |
16 |
ZFMK 45985 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
48.9 |
46.7 |
95.6 |
1.05 |
3.8 |
0.077 |
20 |
5.3 |
+ |
12 |
ZFMK 51516 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
51.4 |
51.2 |
102.6 |
1.00 |
2.2 |
0.042 |
20 |
9.2 |
+ |
11 |
ZFMK 51517 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
50.5 |
47.6 |
98.1 |
1.06 |
3.1 |
0.062 |
18 |
5.8 |
+ |
11 |
ZFMK 50615 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
42.0 |
41.8 |
83.8 |
1.00 |
3.0 |
0.072 |
18 |
5.9 |
+ |
11 |
ZFMK 45983 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
50.8 |
48.6 |
99.4 |
1.05 |
4.1 |
0.081 |
- |
- |
+ |
12 |
ZFMK 45986 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
45.0 |
45.2 |
90.3 |
1.00 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
12 |
ZFMK 48226 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
47.6 |
47.3 |
94.9 |
1.01 |
2.5 |
0.052 |
14 |
5.7 |
+ |
15 |
……continued on the next page …….continued on the next page
Continued.
TABLE 1.
(Continued)
|
collection no. species
|
locality
|
sex
|
SVL
|
TaL
|
TL
|
RST
|
LRA
|
RRS
|
RAPSC
|
NPSCM
|
RC
|
NSL
|
ZFMK 45984
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
55.5 |
52.5 |
108.0 |
1.06 |
1.2 |
0.022 |
10 |
8.1 |
+ |
12 |
ZSM 227/2002
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
48.8 |
52.8 |
101.6 |
0.92 |
3.2 |
0.065 |
15 |
4.7 |
+ |
12 |
ZSM 441/2000
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
45.5 |
43.4 |
88.9 |
1.05 |
2.7 |
0.060 |
16 |
5.9 |
+ |
12 |
SMF 16471
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
50.0 |
46.7 |
96.7 |
1.07 |
2.8 |
0.056 |
14 |
5.0 |
+ |
13 |
SMF 16472
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
46.0 |
45.7 |
91.7 |
1.01 |
3.0 |
0.065 |
14 |
4.7 |
+ |
12 |
ZSM 865/1920
C. boettgeri
|
- |
f |
49.4 |
46.7 |
96.1 |
1.06 |
3.5 |
0.070 |
20 |
5.8 |
+ |
15 |
ZFMK 51515
C. boettgeri
|
- |
f |
51.3 |
48.2 |
99.5 |
1.06 |
2.9 |
0.057 |
17 |
5.8 |
+ |
13 |
MCZ 5988
Ch. macrorhinus
|
‘Madagascar’ |
f |
48.1 |
44.9 |
93.1 |
1.07 |
2.8 |
0.058 |
17 |
6.1 |
+ |
17 |
ZSM 236/2004 |
C. linotum
|
M. d'Ambre |
m |
55.4 |
63.0 |
118.4 |
0.88 |
4.3 |
0.077 |
16 |
3.7 |
+ |
13 |
ZSM 1683/2012 |
C. linotum
|
M. d'Ambre |
m |
53.0 |
56.3 |
109.3 |
0.94 |
4.7 |
0.089 |
cut |
- |
+ |
13 |
ZSM 2073/2007 |
C. linotum
|
M. d'Ambre |
m |
59.6 |
64.8 |
124.4 |
0.92 |
4.5 |
0.075 |
18 |
4.0 |
+ |
- |
ZSM 2072/2007 |
C. linotum
|
M. d'Ambre |
m |
53.7 |
59.2 |
112.8 |
0.91 |
4.3 |
0.080 |
13 |
3.0 |
+ |
13 |
ZFMK 52308 |
C. linotum
|
Joffreville |
m |
36.2 |
37.9 |
74.1 |
0.96 |
2.5 |
0.068 |
15 |
6.1 |
+ |
- |
ZSM 873/1920/3 |
C. linotum
|
- |
m |
54.6 |
58.1 |
112.6 |
0.94 |
4.4 |
0.081 |
14 |
3.2 |
+ |
12 |
ZSM 873/1920/1 |
C. linotum
|
- |
m |
52.4 |
cut |
52.4 |
- |
4.3 |
0.081 |
16 |
3.8 |
+ |
12 |
ZFMK 36630 |
C. linotum
|
- |
m |
55.6 |
61.9 |
117.5 |
- |
4.7 |
0.085 |
15 |
3.2 |
+ |
12 |
ZSM 551/2001 |
C. linotum
|
Andampy |
f |
50.6 |
50.7 |
101.3 |
1.00 |
2.0 |
0.040 |
9 |
4.5 |
+ |
13 |
ZSM 622/1999 |
C. linotum
|
- |
f |
54.5 |
54.9 |
109.4 |
0.99 |
4.1 |
0.075 |
15 |
3.7 |
+ |
13 |
ZSM 873/1920/2 |
C. linotum
|
- |
f |
42.7 |
47.4 |
90.1 |
0.90 |
3.1 |
0.072 |
15 |
4.9 |
+ |
12 |
ZSM 21/1923 |
C. linotum
|
‘Madagascar’ |
m |
56.1 |
70.0 |
126.1 |
0.80 |
4.3 |
0.077 |
15 |
3.5 |
+ |
14 |
collection no. species locality sex NIL OLD OLN PC DC AP DSC RSB NSC UAD RAS
……continued on the next page
collection no. species locality sex NIL OLD OLN PC DC AP DSC RSB NSC UAD RAS
SMF 16471
C. boettgeri
Nosy
Be
f 10 4.2 0.0 - 0 - 0.4 0.007 9 2.2 0.044 SMF 16472
C. boettgeri
Nosy
Be
f 13 3.5 0.1 - 11 - 0.4 0.009 10 1.8 0.039 ZSM 865/1920
C. boettgeri
- f 13 2.8 0.1 - 0 - 0.3 0.006 9 1.9 0.038 ZFMK 51515
C. boettgeri
- f 13 3.3 0.7 - 0 - 0.3 0.006 12 2.1 0.041 MCZ 5988
Ch
. macrorhinus
‘Madagascar’ f 6.1 3.2 0.1 - 0 - 0.3 0.007 8 2.3 0.047 Individuals from Montagne d’Ambre show clear morphological differences from
Nosy
Be specimens (
Fig. 7
). The adult males examined from Montagne d’Ambre are larger than those from
Nosy
Be (mean values of TL
107.8 mm
in Montagne d’Ambre vs.
99.3 mm
in
Nosy
Be,
Table 2
), their rostral appendage is longer related to the snoutvent length (RRS 0.078 vs. 0.065) and the ratio of arm diameter to snout-vent length is larger (UAD/SVL 0.053 vs. 0.042).
ZFMK 51389 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
12 |
3.7 |
0.3 |
- |
19 - |
0.4 |
0.008 |
7 |
2.0 |
0.038 |
ZFMK 51520 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
13 |
3.1 |
0.3 |
- |
2 - |
0.4 |
0.007 |
10 |
2.2 |
0.044 |
ZFMK 45987 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
11 |
4.7 |
0.4 |
- |
0 - |
0.5 |
0.010 |
9 |
2.1 |
0.040 |
ZFMK 45988 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
11 |
3.0 |
0.4 |
- |
12 - |
0.2 |
0.004 |
10 |
2.0 |
0.041 |
ZFMK 51518 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
13 |
3.4 |
0.3 |
- |
0 - |
0.4 |
0.008 |
8 |
2.2 |
0.048 |
ZFMK 51519 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
11 |
4.3 |
0.6 |
- |
18 - |
0.3 |
0.006 |
9 |
2.0 |
0.039 |
ZFMK 51521 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
11 |
3.8 |
0.6 |
- |
5 - |
0.3 |
0.007 |
9 |
1.5 |
0.036 |
ZSM 36/1913 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
12 |
3.2 |
0.0 |
- |
0 - |
0.4 |
0.008 |
12 |
1.8 |
0.043 |
ZSM 440/2000 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
12 |
4.8 |
0.3 |
- |
28 - |
0.4 |
0.008 |
14 |
2.5 |
0.050 |
ZSM 444/2000 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
12 |
3.7 |
0.5 |
- |
15 - |
0.4 |
0.008 |
11 |
2.3 |
0.045 |
SMF 16471 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
13 |
4.0 |
0.0 |
- |
11 - |
0.4 |
0.009 |
9 |
2.0 |
0.040 |
ZFMK 51514 |
C. boettgeri
|
- |
m |
13 |
3.7 |
0.3 |
- |
14 - |
0.5 |
0.009 |
11 |
2.2 |
0.044 |
ZSM 866/1920 |
C. boettgeri
|
- |
m |
15 |
3.7 |
0.3 |
- |
20 - |
0.4 |
0.008 |
8 |
2.0 |
0.036 |
ZFMK 45985 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
13 |
4.6 |
0.5 |
- |
0 - |
0.4 |
0.007 |
10 |
1.8 |
0.036 |
ZFMK 51516 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
11 |
3.8 |
0.5 |
- |
0 - |
0.3 |
0.007 |
12 |
2.2 |
0.042 |
ZFMK 51517 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
11 |
2.7 |
0.5 |
- |
0 - |
0.4 |
0.007 |
14 |
2.2 |
0.044 |
ZFMK 50615 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
12 |
3.4 |
0.4 |
- |
0 - |
0.4 |
0.008 |
8 |
1.5 |
0.036 |
ZFMK 45983 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
12 |
3.5 |
0.0 |
- |
0 - |
0.3 |
0.006 |
11 |
2.1 |
0.040 |
ZFMK 45986 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
11 |
3.0 |
0.5 |
- |
3 - |
0.3 |
0.007 |
9 |
2.0 |
0.044 |
ZFMK 48226 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
14 |
2.7 |
0.3 |
- |
0 - |
0.2 |
0.004 |
- |
1.9 |
0.039 |
ZFMK 45984 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
11 |
2.8 |
0.4 |
- |
0 - |
0.3 |
0.005 |
11 |
2.0 |
0.036 |
ZSM 227/2002 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
12 |
3.3 |
0.1 |
- |
0 - |
0.3 |
0.006 |
11 |
2.0 |
0.041 |
ZSM 441/2000 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
12 |
3.9 |
0.5 |
- |
0 - |
0.4 |
0.008 |
9 |
2.2 |
0.048 |
TABLE 1.
(Continued)
ZSM 236/2004 |
C. linotum
|
M. d'Ambre |
m |
13 |
4.5 |
0.0 |
4 10 - |
0.7 |
0.012 |
18 |
2.9 |
0.052 |
ZSM 1683/2012 |
C. linotum
|
M. d'Ambre |
m |
13 |
4.7 |
0.1 |
3 8 - |
0.7 |
0.014 |
20 |
2.9 |
0.055 |
ZSM 2073/2007 |
C. linotum
|
M. d'Ambre |
m |
12 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
3 13 - |
0.6 |
0.010 |
22 |
3.1 |
0.052 |
ZSM 2072/2007 |
C. linotum
|
M. d'Ambre |
m |
12 |
3.8 |
0.2 |
4 12 - |
0.8 |
0.015 |
21 |
3.1 |
0.058 |
ZFMK 52308 |
C. linotum
|
Joffreville |
m |
- |
2.8 |
0.0 |
3 9 - |
0.4 |
0.011 |
20 |
1.7 |
0.048 |
ZSM 873/1920/3 |
C. linotum
|
- |
m |
14 |
4.1 |
0.2 |
6 5 - |
0.7 |
0.013 |
19 |
3.0 |
0.054 |
ZSM 873/1920/1 |
C. linotum
|
- |
m |
12 |
4.8 |
0.1 |
5 4 - |
0.8 |
0.015 |
19 |
3.0 |
0.058 |
ZFMK 36630 |
C. linotum
|
- |
m |
12 |
3.7 |
0.3 |
4 0 - |
0.7 |
0.012 |
23 |
3.0 |
0.054 |
ZSM 551/2001 |
C. linotum
|
Andampy |
f |
13 |
5.1 |
0.0 |
(5) 6 - |
0.6 |
0.011 |
16 |
2.8 |
0.055 |
ZSM 622/1999 |
C. linotum
|
- |
f |
13 |
4.1 |
0.2 |
(4) 0 - |
0.6 |
0.011 |
22 |
2.9 |
0.054 |
ZSM 873/1920/2 |
C. linotum
|
- |
f |
12 |
3.9 |
0.0 |
6 0 - |
0.5 |
0.013 |
17 |
2.8 |
0.065 |
ZSM 21/1923 |
C. linotum
|
‘Madagascar’ |
m |
14 |
4.7 |
0.1 |
(5) 0 - |
0.7 |
0.013 |
22 |
3.0 |
0.054 |
TABLE 2
. Mean values and standard deviations (SD) of morphological measurements of
Calumma boettgeri
, n (males) = 11, n (females) = 12 and
C. linotum
males (n =5); all measurements in mm. For abbreviations see Table 1.
species
C. boettgeri C. boettgeri
C. linotum
locality
Nosy
Be
Nosy
Be M. d'Ambre
sex m f m
mean value SD |
mean value |
SD |
mean value |
SD |
SVL |
48.5 4.2 |
48.6 |
3.8 |
51.6 |
9.0 |
TaL |
50.8 4.2 |
47.7 |
3.7 |
56.2 |
10.8 |
TL |
99.3 8.1 |
96.3 |
7.2 |
107.8 |
19.7 |
RST |
0.96 0.04 |
1.02 |
0.04 |
0.92 |
0.03 |
LRA |
3.1 0.5 |
2.9 |
0.9 |
4.1 |
0.9 |
RRS |
0.065 0.014 |
0.059 |
0.018 |
0.078 |
0.008 |
RAPSC |
18.9 4.7 |
16.4 |
3.4 |
15.5 |
2.1 |
NPSCM |
6.1 1.0 |
6.3 |
1.5 |
4.2 |
1.3 |
NSL |
12 0.5 |
12 |
1 |
13 |
0 |
NIL |
11.8 0.8 |
11.9 |
0.9 |
12.5 |
0.6 |
OLD |
3.8 0.6 |
3.7 |
0.4 |
4.0 |
0.7 |
DSC |
0.36 0.08 |
0.32 |
0.05 |
0.64 |
0.15 |
RSB |
0.0075 0.0015 |
0.0066 |
0.0012 |
0.0124 |
0.0019 |
NSC |
9.9 2.0 |
10.6 |
1.8 |
20.2 |
1.5 |
UAD |
2.1 0.3 |
2.0 |
0.2 |
2.7 |
0.6 |
RAS |
0.042 0.005 |
0.041 |
0.004 |
0.053 |
0.004 |
Both populations show heterogeneous scalation, especially at the extremities and the rostral appendage. The enlarged rounded tubercles on the limbs are distinctly larger in animals from Montagne d’Ambre; the mean diameter of the largest tubercle of the upper arm is
0.64 mm
compared to
0.36 mm
(
Nosy
Be). Additionally the number of the enlarged tubercles on the upper arm of males from Montagne d’Ambre is approximately twice that of males from
Nosy
Be, with a mean of 20.2 compared to 9.9, respectively, and the tubercles are not bordering each other on
Nosy
Be individuals. This character is also confirmed from a juvenile of SVL
26.9 mm
(ZFMK 48227,
Nosy
Be) and a juvenile of SVL
36.2 mm
(ZFMK 52308, Joffreville). Another morphological difference between both populations can be found in the pholidosis of the rostral appendage. Although the rostral appendage is significantly smaller in males from
Nosy
Be (see above), they have more peripheral scales on it, with a mean of 18.9 compared to
15.5 in
Montagne d’Ambre males. In relation to the size of the appendage, this means 6.1 scales per mm compared with 4.1 scales per mm in Montagne d’Ambre. In summary, specimens from Montagne d’Ambre show a more heterogeneous scalation with broader tubercles on extremities and the rostral appendage. This is true of females as well (note that only one female with locality data was examined). Montagne d’Ambre individuals differ also in both sexes from
Nosy
Be specimens in the presence of a parietal crest which is best visible in the micro-CT scan (see below).
The other morphological features either were highly variable or did not differ between the populations. For example, the number of dorsal cones was
0–28 in
Nosy
Be, and
9–13 in
Montagne d’Ambre. Likewise the edges of the occipital lobes vary between the specimens. They range between un-notched and clearly notched (up to
0.7 mm
) in
Nosy
Be, and are either not or only slightly notched (up to
0.3 mm
) in Montagne d’Ambre. All specimens have a rostral crest and none have axillary pits.
Colouration.
Males also show great differences between the populations in colouration (see
Fig. 2
A, B). Males from Montagne d’Ambre were more colourful, with a true blue rostral appendage and greenish turquoise extremities (
Fig. 2
A). The colour of the legs is induced only by the coloured tubercle scales. The body is pale green or light brown with two dark brown spots and (occasionally) a beige lateral stripe on each side that stops at the base of the tail. The tail is the same colour as the body and (in stress colouration) possesses black annulations. The head is also greenish or brown with a dark stripe from the snout crossing the eyes to the occipital lobes. The skin around the mouth and the throat can be white. The colour description is based on a total of seven pictures of the Montagne d’Ambre form, referred to as
C. boettgeri
in
Schmidt
et al.
(2010)
,
C. boettgeri
(picture 1c) in
Glaw & Vences (2007)
Calumma
sp. in
Nečas (2004)
and
C. boettgeri
in
Garbutt
et al.
(2001)
. The body and head of females is brown; the rostral appendage can be coloured bright blue, see picture of
C. boettgeri
in
Schmidt
et al.
(2010)
.
FIGURE 2
. (A) Baseline colouration in life of male
Calumma linotum
from Montagne d’Ambre during day; (B) Baseline colouration in life of male
C. boettgeri
from Nosy Be during day; (C) female
C. linotum
from Montagne d’Ambre at night; (D) female
C. boettgeri
from Nosy Be at night. Photos taken by FG.
The body colouration of males from
Nosy
Be in contrast is yellowish or greenish brown with little dark brown rosettes, when stressed (
Fig. 2
B). The legs are brown with little blue or green spots resulting from the tubercles. The colouration of the head is similar to the body colouration. The rostral appendage differs clearly from Montagne d’Ambre with the absence of any striking colour and is the same brown colour as the casque. Females are uniformly light or greenish brown coloured. Compare also a total of seven pictures of
Calumma boettgeri
in
Hyde Roberts & Daly (2014)
, in
Glaw & Vences (2007: 191)
picture 1a and 1b, in
Nečas (2004)
and in
Henkel & Schmidt (1995)
.
Osteology of the skull based on micro-CT scans.
Micro-CT scans of heads of two males and two females from
Nosy
Be and from Montagne d’Ambre exposed additional differences between the two forms. Specimens from Montagne d’Ambre (
Fig. 4
, D and E) bear tubercles on the parietal in both sexes. These form a little parietal crest in the middle with three to four tubercles, laterally followed by two tubercles on each side. The frontal is also irregularly spotted with tubercles. The parietal and frontal of animals from
Nosy
Be in contrast are smooth (
Fig. 4
, A and B).
As
in all species of the genus
Calumma
, the nasal bones are paired (
Rieppel & Crumly 1997
). These are broader in our specimens from Montagne d’Ambre (mean NW
0.35 mm
vs.
0.24 mm
in
Nosy
Be; mean NW/NL 0.18 vs. 0.14,
Table 3
,
Fig. 4
) and the anterior tip of the frontal bone does not exceed more than a half of the naris. In skulls from
Nosy
Be it does exceed this point, and the frontal meets the premaxilla, as described for
C. nasutum
(
Rieppel & Crumly 1997
)
. The parietal also varies between the two localities. In
Nosy
Be samples, the parietal tapers more tightly. Its diameter is at the tightest area on average
0.61 mm
(vs.
1.06 mm
) and 11% of the largest diameter of the parietal (vs. 22%,
Table 3
,
Fig. 4
). The parietal in Montagne d’Ambre samples appears wider and more compact. However, the form of the parietal is variable within localities and cannot be used as a diagnostic character. Although chameleons are sexually dimorphic animals, differences between sexes in skull structure were not proven (
Table 3
).
TABLE 3
. Osteological measurements of important characters of the skull for differentiation between
Calumma boettgeri
und
C. linotum
.
Notes: m, male; f, female; NL, nasal length; NW, nasal width; RNWL, ratio of nasal width to length; PL, largest diameter; PS, parietal smallest diameter; RPSL, ratio of parietal smallest to largest diameter; PC, parietal crest absent (-) or number of tubercles.
collection no. |
species |
locality |
sex |
NL |
NW |
RNWL |
PL |
PS |
RPSL |
PC |
ZSM 440/2000 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
2.1 |
0.3 |
0.14 |
4.7 |
0.5 |
0.11 |
- |
ZSM 441/2000 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
2.2 |
0.2 |
0.09 |
3.9 |
0.5 |
0.13 |
- |
ZSM 444/2000 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
m |
1.8 |
0.3 |
0.17 |
4.7 |
0.3 |
0.07 |
- |
ZSM 227/2002 |
C. boettgeri
|
Nosy Be |
f |
1.3 |
0.2 |
0.15 |
4.1 |
0.6 |
0.15 |
- |
mean value |
1.85 |
0.25 |
0.14 |
4.35 |
0.49 |
0.11 |
SD |
0.40 |
0.06 |
0.03 |
0.41 |
0.11 |
0.03 |
MCZ 5988 |
Ch. macrorhinus
|
‘Madagascar’ |
f |
2.0 |
0.2 |
0.10 |
3.9 |
1.1 |
0.28 |
1 |
ZSM 2072/2007 |
C. linotum
|
M. d'Ambre |
m |
2.5 |
0.4 |
0.16 |
4.5 |
1.5 |
0.33 |
4 |
ZSM 2073/2007 |
C. linotum
|
M. d'Ambre |
m |
2.1 |
0.4 |
0.19 |
4.6 |
0.6 |
0.13 |
3 |
ZSM 873/1920/2 |
C. linotum
|
M. d'Ambre |
f |
2.3 |
0.3 |
0.15 |
4.2 |
0.9 |
0.21 |
4 |
ZSM 551/2001 |
C. linotum
|
Andampy |
f |
1.4 |
0.3 |
0.23 |
4.3 |
0.9 |
0.21 |
3 |
mean value |
2.07 |
0.36 |
0.18 |
4.40 |
0.97 |
0.22 |
3.50 |
SD |
0.49 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.18 |
0.38 |
0.08 |
0.58 |
ZSM 21/1923 |
C. linotum
|
‘Madagascar’ |
m |
2.7 |
0.3 |
0.11 |
4.6 |
1.4 |
0.30 |
4 |
Hemipenial morphology based on micro-CT scans.
The scans of hemipenes of specimens from each population enable a detailed view of their structure. The hemipenes are illustrated in sulcal and asulcal view with the apex on top (
Fig. 5
). Both populations show large and deep calyces with smooth ridges on the asulcal side of the truncus. The apex is ornamented with two pairs of long pointed papillae and two pairs of rotulae. The papillae rise from the sulcal side of the apex and are curved to the asulcal side. They can be completely everted (
Fig. 5
, C) or retracted in the apex (
Fig. 5
, D). One pair of rotulae is placed on the asulcal side (the smaller one) and one pair on the sulcal side. Here some differences between the populations are recognizable; in
Nosy
Be (n = 2) the rotulae are slightly more denticulated, with 6–11 tips on asulcal side and 14–16 tips on sulcal side, compared to Montagne d’Ambre (n = 3) with 6–8 tips on the rotulae of the asulcal side and 11–14 tips on both rotulae on the sulcal side.