Description of Abursanema iranicum n. gen., n. sp. (Nematoda: Hexatylina, Sphaerularioidea) from Iran and its phylogenetic relationships
Author
Yaghoubi, Ali
Author
Pourjam, Ebrahim
Author
Pedram, Majid
Author
Siddiqi, Mohammad Rafiq
Author
Atighi, Mohammad Reza
text
Zootaxa
2014
3826
2
301
314
journal article
45344
10.11646/zootaxa.3826.2.1
79169acd-3a66-461a-a762-96137cb7e239
1175-5326
254573
9279B0A4-B92D-4132-8DD4-CEB9E0DFFE03
Abursanema iranicum
n. gen.
, n. sp.
(
Figs 1
&
2
)
Measurements.
See
Table 3
.
Description. Male
. Free-living. Body slightly ventrally arcuate after heat relaxation. Inner cuticle finely annulated, outer cuticle smooth throughout body length, lateral field with two incisures. Deirid at the level of excretory pore. Lip region low, rounded and slightly flattened, continuous with body contour. Stylet short, weak, 6.5–10.5 Μm, without basal knobs, dorsal arm of the shaft slightly longer than the ventral. Orifice of dorsal gland 1–2 Μm behind stylet base. Corpus cylindroid, metacorpus weakly developed, spindle-shaped, without a valvular apparatus, isthmus narrow, 35–47 Μm long. Basal bulb large, pyriform, with stem-like extension projecting into the lumen of intestine. Excretory pore opening at the level of middle of basal bulb, 86–107 Μm from anterior end. Hemizonid located just anterior to excretory pore. Nerve ring enveloping isthmus in its posterior half. Testis single, anteriorly outstretched, gonoduct 159–252 Μm long; sperm spheroid. Spicules paired, ventrally arcuate, with rounded manubrium and pointed distal tip, gubernaculum arcuate. Bursa absent. Phasmid hardly visible, located at 0.75–1.0 times body width posterior to cloaca. Tail long, with narrowly rounded or pointed tip.
FIGURE 1.
Abursanema iranicum
n. gen.
,
n. sp.
A: Anterior body region, with details of pharynx; B: Head region, showing annulated inner cuticle; C: Female reproductive system; D, E: Male and female entire body; F: Male cloacal region showing absence of bursa; G: Female, cross section; H: Anterior end of female reproductive system, showing extension over the posterior part of the pharynx.
FIGURE 2.
Abursanema iranicum
n. gen.
,
n. sp.
A: Anterior body region showing annulated inner cuticle and details of stylet; B: Female tail end; C: Extension of pharynx; D: Lip region, en
–
face view; E: Lateral field; F: Part of female reproductive system showing spermatheca; G&H: Male cloacal region, ventral and lateral view; I: Anterior end of female reproductive system, showing extension over the posterior part of the pharynx and excretory pore (arrow); J: Phasmid (arrow) (scale bars: D = 5 µm, all the rest = 10 µm).
TABLE 3.
Morphometrics of
Abursanema iranicum
n. gen.
,
n. sp.
All measurements are in μm and in the form: mean ± s.d. (range).
Characters Male |
Female |
Holotype |
Paratypes |
Paratypes |
n – |
16 |
26 |
L 586 |
561.0 ± 20.7 (525
–
593)
|
684.0±40.6 (585
–
740)
|
L' 462 |
437 ± 14 (412
–
462)
|
540 ± 36.3 (465
–
595)
|
a 34.5 |
33.6 ± 1.9 (31
–
37)
|
32.0 ± 1.2 (29
–
34)
|
b 4.2 |
4.3 ± 0.2 (4
–
5)
|
4.8 ± 0.4 (4.1
–
5.4)
|
c 4.7 |
4.6 ± 4.0 (4.0
–
5.6)
|
4.8 ± 0.5 (3.9
–
5.6)
|
c' 7.8 |
8.1 ± 1.1 (6.3
–
9.8)
|
8.8 ± 1.2 (6.8
–
11.6)
|
V or T 40.4 |
41.0 ±4.9 (31
–
48)
|
70.7 ± 1.9 (66
–
75)
|
V' – |
– |
89.6 ± 0.9 (88.0
–
91.5)
|
Head height 2.5 |
2.1 ± 0.3 (1.5
–
2.5)
|
2.3 ± 0.3 (2
–
3)
|
Head width 6 |
5.8 ± 0.2 (5.5
–
6.0)
|
6.8 ± 0.5 (6
–
8)
|
Stylet 9 |
8.5 ± 1.2 (6.5
–
10.5)
|
8.9 ± 0.7 (8.0
–
10)
|
Conus 3 |
3.3 ± 0.6 (2
–
4)
|
3.7 ± 0.6 (3
–
5)
|
m 33 |
40.5 ± 5.5 (33
–
50)
|
41.0 ± 6.5 (30
–
50)
|
Anterior end to centre of median bulb 57 |
52.0 ± 4.2 (45
–
58)
|
51.7 ± 4.0 (43
–
58)
|
MB 41 |
40.1 ± 3.2 (34.6
–
45.2)
|
36.3 ± 3.5 (32.5
–
46.0)
|
Excretory pore 107 |
99.0 ± 6.3 (86
–
107)
|
108.7 ± 6.0 (98
–
121)
|
Pharynx 139 |
130.0 ± 6.4 (111
–
139)
|
144.0 ± 10.2 (123
–
163)
|
Head
–
vulva –
|
– |
484.0 ± 32.6 (415
–
531)
|
Max. body diam. 17 |
16.8 ± 0.9 (15
–
18)
|
21.4 ± 1.2 (18
–
23)
|
PUS – |
– |
7.8 ± 1.3 (5
–
10)
|
PUS/BW – |
– |
0.4 ± 0.1 (0.3
–
0.5)
|
Anal/cloacal body diam. 16 |
15.3 ± 0.7 (13.5
–
16.0)
|
16.6 ± 1.7 (13
–
20)
|
Vulva
–
anus –
|
– |
56.0 ± 6.3 (46
–
69)
|
Tail 124 |
123.0 ± 14.3 (97
–
142)
|
144.3 ± 16.0 (109
–
174)
|
Spicule 22 |
20.6 ± 1.4 (18
–
23)
|
– |
Gubernaculum 6 |
6.1 ± 0.8 (4
–
7)
|
– |
Female
. Free-living (infective entomoparasitic female not found). General morphology similar to that of male, except for character states associated with sexual differences. Reproductive system monodelphic-prodelphic, ovary with single row of oocytes, usually reflexed two times at proximal end, spermatheca rounded to ellipsoid, filled with spheroid sperm, crustaformeria short,
ca
1.7–2.1 body widths long, vulva a transverse slit, vagina extending into the body a little less than half body width, postvulval uterine sac less than corresponding body width. Vulva-anus distance 46–69 Μm,
ca
0.3–0.6 of the tail length.
Etymology.
The name of the genus is Greek meaning ‘nematode without a bursa’ and is neuter in gender. Specific epithet refers to the country of occurrence.
Molecular phylogenetic relationships. Partial 18S rDNA phylogeny.
Our 942 bp partial SSU rDNA sequence, GenBank accession number
KF885743
, was used to determine the phylogenetic relationships of
Abursanema
n. gen.
with other tylenchid nematodes. A BlastN search of the GenBank sequence database was performed and the closest sequences/species, along with sequences of genera with morphological similarity, were selected for inclusion in the analyses. The dataset was composed of 2493 total characters, of which 2118 characters were variable and 1824 characters were parsimony-informative after manual editing. The average nucleotide composition was as follows: 25.7% A, 20.6% C, 26.4% G and 27.2 % T.
Figure 3
presents a Bayesian phylogenetic tree inferred from the multiple alignment of partial SSU sequences of 23 tylenchid taxa, one outgroup taxon and one isolate of the newly recovered/sequenced genus. The BPP and ML BS values are given on the appropriate clades in the form BPP/ML BS. In this tree, the new genus forms a clade with one species of
Deladenus
Thorne, 1941
(saccession number
EU306345
), and two species of
Sphaerularia
(accession numbers
AB
300595
and
AB
250213
), members of the superfamily Sphaerularioidea (see
Siddiqi, 2000
). The monophyly of this clade is well supported in both
BI
and ML methods (1.00 and 0.96% respectively). The other species of
Deladenus
used in our analyses (
D. proximus
Bedding, 1974
, accession number
JF304744
) does not share a common ancestor with
Deladenus
sp. (
EU306345
) and occupies another position in the tree. This clade forms a sister clade to the remaining members of
Hexatylina
with low BPP (0.55) and no support under ML. Based on the current paucity of data and the restricted number of
Hexatylina
species that have been sequenced, the relationships among these taxa cannot be clearly resolved.
D2/D3 segment of 28S rDNA phylogeny.
To reconstruct the 28S rDNA tree, a 706 bp partial sequence of D2/ D3 region with accession number
KF885742
was used.
Figure 4
presents the phylogenetic tree of 37 tylenchid taxa, one outgroup and one isolate of
Abursanema iranicum
n. gen.
,
n. sp.
The dataset was composed of 941 total characters of which 887 characters were variable and 827 characters were parsimony-informative after manual editing, with an average nucleotide composition of 23.7 % A, 19.6 % C, 29.8 % G and 26.9 % T. As in the 18S tree, the new genus formed a clade with two species of
Sphaerularia
(
AB
300595
and
AB733665
) with high BPP and ML BS support. This makes sense, considering the morphological similarities of these taxa, mostly in the shape of the pharynx. According to
Siddiqi (2000)
, the families
Sphaerulariidae
and
Paurodontidae
are synonymous and the grouping of
Sphaerularia
, as a member of
Sphaerulariidae
, and the new genus, as a member of
Paurodontidae
, in our tree supports his opinion.
Discussion.
Our phylogenetic study, using both partial 18S rDNA and D2/D3 segment of 28S rDNA, reveals new insights on the molecular phylogenetic affinities of members of
Hexatylina
, including
Abursanema
n. gen.
In constructed trees using partial sequences of both SSU (
Fig. 3
) and LSU (
Fig. 4
),
Abursanema
n. gen.
(
Paurodontidae
) clusters with sequenced species of
Sphaerularia
(Sphaerularidae)
, supporting the synonymy of
Paurodontidae
and
Sphaerulariidae
(
Siddiqi, 2000
,
Chizhov, 2004
and
Andrássy, 2007
). In the partial 18S tree,
Deladenus
sp. (
EU306345
) forms a clade with
Abursanema
n. gen.
but
D. proximus
(
JF304744
) is placed in a clade with
Howardula
spp. (
AF519234
,
JX
291137
and
AY146451
) and
Bradynema listronoti
Zeng, Giblin-Davis, Ye, Belair, Boivin & Thomas, 2007
(
DQ915805
). No free-living mycetophagous generation is known for the latter two genera, but one occurs in
Deladenus
. Based on our result, using of this biological character to classify genera in
Hexatylina
is questionable. The inferred tree using partial sequences of D2/D3 of 28S rDNA shows the same result as in the SSU tree. In our 28S tree,
Howardula phyllotretae
Oldham, 1933
(
DQ328728
) and
Parasitylenchus
sp. (
DQ328729
) form a highly supported clade in both
BI
and ML methods (1.00/99). These genera are currently classified in different families,
Allantonematidae Pereira, 1931
and
Parasitylenchidae
Siddiqi, 1986
respectively, assigned to different superfamilies, Sphaerularioidea and Iotonchioidea Goodey, 1953 (
Siddiqi, 1986
), respectively. Members of both genera are insect parasites. Thus, parasitism of the insect haemocoel may have evolved independently in both superfamilies (
Siddiqi, 2000
). We believe that additional molecular data from other genera may give a clearer picture of the relationships among members of
Hexatylina
. Both partial 18S and 28S rDNA trees confirm that
Howardula
Cobb, 1921
is polyphyletic (see various papers, including Ye
et al.,
2007).
Abursanema
n. gen.
and
Sphaerularia
spp. form a highly supported clade in both ML and
BI
methods, but again these genera have been assigned to different families (
Paurodontidae
and
Sphaerulariidae
, respectively), albeit families that may in fact be synonymous. In
Paurodontidae
, a fungus-feeding generation is well-known but nothing is known of entomoparasitic forms, while in
Sphaerulariidae
a free-living generation may be present (
Siddiqi, 2000
). Accordingly, and as noted above for the partial 18S tree, life cycle should not be considered a basic character for classification of members of the Hextaylina. This proposal conflicts with what was noted by
Chizhov
et al.
(2012)
who emphasized the importance of life cycle characteristics in the systematics of hexatylenchid nematodes. The results of our molecular phylogenetic studies with partial sequences of both 18S rDNA and especially the D2/D3 expansion segment of 28S rDNA show a close relationship of members of
Paurodontidae
and
Sphaerulariidae
, and also highlight the need for data from additional representatives of both families so that their relationships could be more clearly elucidated.