Revision of the western Palaearctic species of Aleiodes Wesmael (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Rogadinae). Part 2: Revision of the A. apicalis group Author van Achterberg, Cornelis Author Shaw, Mark R. Author Quicke, Donald L. J. text ZooKeys 2020 919 1 259 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.919.39642 journal article http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.919.39642 1313-2970-919-1 0CC5169A232541AD938F179FCB056381 CBA7303BD1B65E07A4DC591C877727BA Aleiodes hemipterus (Marshall, 1897) Figs 385-389 , 390-399 , 400-408 Rhogas hemipterus Marshall, 1897: 137. Rogas hemipterus ; Shenefelt 1975 : 1233. Aleiodes hemipterus ; Papp 1990 : 90, 2003 : 138 (lectotype listed). Aleiodes (Chelonorhogas) hemipterus ; Belokobylskij and Kula 2012 : 35-38. Type material. Lectotype here designated, ♀ (ZJUH), " Tunisie , Sicard", "Type, H.T.", "B.M. Type Hym. 3.c.243", "B.M. Type Hym., Rhogas hemipterus Marshall, 1896", " hemipterus Marsh.", "Marshall coll. 1904-120". Paralectotype: 1 ♀ (MTMA), "Tunisie" , " hemipterus M. coll. Marshall", "Paratypus Rhogas hemipterus Marshall 1897 sp. n. % des Papp J. 1986", "Hym. Type No 10582 Museum Budapest", " Aleiodes ♀ hemipterus Mshl. Det. Papp J. 1991". Additional material. 1 ♀ + 1 ♂ (MNHN), "[ N. Tunisia :] Teboursouk", " Rhogas hemipterus Mrsh.", "Museum Paris, Coll. J. de Gaulle, 1919" [figured specimens]; 1 ♂ [but metasoma missing] (ZJUH) "Rabat, Maroc [= Morocco ], coll. Thery". Molecular data. None. Biology. Unknown. The specimens seen do not have phenological data, and we have not seen reared material. As the female is brachypterous it is likely that the host will be found near the ground. Diagnosis. Maximum width of hypoclypeal depression approx. 0.6 x minimum width of face (Fig. 396 ); OOL of ♀ 1.2-1.3 x as long as diameter of posterior ocellus, of ♂ 0.9 x (Figs 397 , 408 ) and finely reticulate-rugose; stemmaticum protruding dorsally; antennal segments of ♀ 46-50 (of ♂ unknown), penultimate segments approx. as long as wide and antenna 0.8 x as long as body; length of malar space 0.3-0.4 x height of eye; mesoscutal lobes densely rugose or rugulose and rather matt, middle lobe with medio-longitudinal ridge or carina, of ♀ surrounded by shallow grooves (Fig. 392 ); propodeum angulate posteriorly (Fig. 392 ); ♀ brachypterous and ♂ macropterous; marginal cell of hind wing of ♀ hardly widened (Fig. 390 ) and of ♂ distinctly widened apically (Fig. 403 ); hind tarsal claws with rather conspicuous pale brown pecten (Fig. 399 ); 1st-3rd metasomal tergites very densely and finely longitudinally rugose; 1st tergite of ♀ 1.0-1.1 x its apical width, of ♂ approx. 1.4 x ; 2nd metasomal suture of ♀ hardly impressed but densely costate, of ♂ medium-sized. Description. Lectotype, ♀, length of hind wing 1.7 mm (fore wing missing, but in other specimens ca one-third longer than hind wing and 2.2 mm, brachypterous), of body 7.8 mm. Head. Antenna incomplete, segments robust; frons largely striate-rugose (but transversely costate in figured ♀); OOL 1.2 x diameter of posterior ocellus, (as vertex) rather finely and densely reticulate-rugose and rather dull; clypeus rugose; ventral margin of clypeus rather thick ventrally and rather forward protruding (Fig. 398 ); width of hypoclypeal depression 0.6 x minimum width of face and long (Fig. 396 ); length of eye 1.2 x temple in dorsal view (Fig. 397 ); vertex behind stemmaticum rather coarsely reticulate-rugose; clypeus near lower level of eyes; length of malar space 0.35 x length of eye in lateral view. Mesosoma. Antescutal depression distinct; mesoscutal lobes coarsely rugose-punctate (but superficial in figured ♀) and rather matt, middle lobe of pair of submedian grooves (Fig. 392 ); nearly entire mesopleuron (except minute smooth speculum) densely and coarsely reticulate-rugose; scutellum coarsely rugose and without lateral carinae; propodeum coarsely vermiculate-rugose, dorsal face long and rectangularly angulate postero-laterally (Fig. 392 ). Wings. Fore wing brachypterous, hardly surpassing propodeum (Marshall, 1897): (of ♀ from Tunisia r 0.2 x 3-SR; 1-CU1 distinctly widened and oblique, 0.4 x 2-CU1; r-m 0.8 x 3-SR; 2nd submarginal cell medium-sized (Fig. 390 ); cu-a short, vertical, straight; 1-M straight posteriorly; 1-SR widened; 1st subdiscal cell open apically and posteriorly; surroundings of M+CU1, 1-M and 1-CU1 setose; 2m-cu present as curved and only pigmented vein). Hind wing brachypterous: marginal cell reduced, sinuate and apically narrowed (Fig. 390 ); 2-SC+R quadrate and widened; m-cu absent; M+CU:1-M = 27:13; 1r-m 0.6 x 1-M. Legs. Tarsal claws with rather conspicuous pale brown pecten, remaining far from apical tooth and much shorter (Fig. 399 ); hind coxa finely and densely reticulate-rugose; hind trochantellus robust; length of hind femur and basitarsus 3.6 and 6.0 x their width, respectively; length of inner hind spur 0.4 x hind basitarsus. Metasoma. First tergite evenly convex, as long as wide apically; 1st-3rd tergites regularly finely and very densely longitudinally rugose, rather matt and medio-longitudinal carina rather weak; medio-basal area of 2nd tergite triangular and short (Fig. 393 ); 2nd suture shallow; 4th and subsequent tergites superficially punctulate; 4th and apical half of 3rd tergite without sharp lateral crease; ovipositor sheath wide, with medium-sized setae and apically truncate (Fig. 389 ). Colour. Brown; stemmaticum and ovipositor sheath black; frons, vertex medially, occiput, femora, propodeum, 1st and 2nd tergites somewhat infuscate; wing membrane subhyaline. Variation. Length of body 7.8-8.8 mm. Antennal segments: ♀ 46(1), 50(1); ♂ unknown. Male is normally winged (vein 3-SR of fore wing 1.5 x vein 2-SR, vein r 0.3 x 3-SR, vein cu-a oblique, vein 1-CU1 narrow and 0.3 x vein 2-CU1) and has marginal cell of hind wing 2.2 x wider than width at level of hamuli (with vein m-cu present anteriorly, 2-SC+R quadrate and M+CU:1-M:1r-m = 40:30:26). Apical metasomal segments of ♂ type 1 and sparsely setose. Distribution. Morocco, Tunisia. Notes. Marshall (1897) based his description on three females from Tunisia. Papp (2003) listed a female in ZJUH as lectotype, but this was not accepted as a designation by Belokobylskij & Kula (2012). Therefore, the redescribed female above is here designated formally as lectotype and is the same specimen intended to become lectotype by Papp (2003) . Figures 385-389. Aleiodes hemipterus (Marshall), ♀, Tunisia, Teboursouk 385 habitus lateral 386 antenna 387 apex of antenna 388 base of antenna 389 ovipositor sheath lateral. Figures 390-399. Aleiodes hemipterus (Marshall), ♀, Tunisia, Teboursouk 390 wings 391 mesosoma lateral 392 mesosoma dorsal 393 metasoma dorsal 394 fore femur lateral 395 hind femur lateral 396 head anterior 397 head dorsal 398 head lateral 399 outer hind tarsal claw. Figures 400-408. Aleiodes hemipterus (Marshall), ♂, Tunisia, Teboursouk 400 habitus lateral 401 fore femur lateral 402 fore wing 403 hind wing 404 mesosoma dorsal 405 metasoma dorsal 406 hind femur lateral 407 head anterior 408 head dorsal.