Vertebrate paleobiodiversity of the Early Cretaceous (Berriasian) Angeac-Charente Lagerstätte (southwestern France): implications for continental faunal turnover at the J / K boundary Author Allain, Ronan Author Vullo, Romain Author Rozada, Lee Author Anquetin, Jérémy Author Bourgeais, Renaud Author Goedert, Jean Author Lasseron, Maxime Author Martin, Jeremy E. Author Pérez-García, Adán Author Fabrègues, Claire Peyre De Author Royo-Torres, Rafael Author Augier, Dominique Author Bailly, Gilles text Geodiversitas 2022 2022-07-21 44 25 683 752 journal article 107849 10.5252/geodiversitas2022v44a25 d0184974-bea3-4f97-a2f8-98887ec4f87e 1638-9395 6902033 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EA12DCB7-A5BE-4763-B805-25087EBD726D EUTRICONODONTA Kermack, Mussett & Rigney, 1973 ( Fig. 32A, B, E, F ) DESCRIPTION Some mammalian teeth show a distinctive morphology comprising three main cusps placed serially in anteroposterior alignment on a transversely compressed crown ( Fig. 32A, B, E, F ). This cusp arrangement and general morphology is typical of eutriconodontans (Kielan-Jaworowska et al. 2004). Orientation of these isolated teeth follows the criteria of Godefroit & Battail (1997) . The most convex side of the crown is considered to be the labial face, and the most concave the lingual face. Accessory cusps are usually more numerous or better developed on the distal side, and thus the side bearing the most developed and/or the most differentiated accessory cusps is considered to be distal. The distal inclination of the cusps, when present, also helps to distinguish the mesial and distal faces of the teeth.