Systematics of the blindsnakes (Serpentes: Scolecophidia: Typhlopoidea) based on molecular and morphological evidence Author Pyron, Robert Alexander Author Wallach, Van text Zootaxa 2014 3829 1 1 81 journal article 36820 10.11646/zootaxa.3829.1.1 a4b69269-5a4c-4b5b-9f89-6b314d3ba284 1175-5326 286556 75210CDC-AC6A-4624-A6F1-1BC969BC7CAA Rhinotyphlops Fitzinger, 1843 Type species. Typhlops lalandei Schlegel, 1839 Species content. Rhinotyphlops ataeniatus , Rh. boylei , Rh. lalandei , Rh. schinzi , Rh. scorteccii , and Rh. unitaeniatus . TABLE 5. Visceral character states comparing Malagasy Lemuriatyphlops (LEM) with Malagasy Madatyphlops (Malagasy MAD ) and African Madatyphlops (African MAD ), based on measurement of the specimens in Appendix II (part). Characters are as follows: data in sections (A)-(D) represent sample means as % SVL; organ lengths (PT = posterior tip) are included in section (A) ; organ midpoints (MP) are listed in section (B) ; organ gaps (GAP) and intervals (INT) are compiled in section (C) ; organ midpoint intervals (MP-MP INT) are included in section (D) ; meristic values are listed in section (E) ; ratios of two characters listed in (F) .
Taxon LEM Malagasy MAD African MAD
Sample size n = 7 n = 36 n = 16
(A)
Right liver 25.2 27.1 31.5
Right gonad 4.4 5.6 7.2
Total gonad 8.5 10.1 13.5
Rectal caecum 1.8 2.5 2.8
Right lung 17.4 21.1 19.7
Right lung PT 50.5 52.7 53.3
Tracheal lung 17.3 18.7 17.6
Right bronchus 6.9 9.1 9.7
(B)
Total gonad MP 81.9 76.6 77.7
Right lung MP 41.9 42.1 43.4
(C)
Snout-heart INT 33.2 31.6 31.2
Heart-liver GAP 2.8 2.3 2.5
Heart-liver INT 32.6 34 38.8
Heart-gall bladder GAP 32.6 33.4 34.9
Liver-gall bladder GAP 4.6 3.9 1
Liver-gall bladder INT 31.4 32.6 34.6
Liver-kidney GAP 26.6 24.6 18.8
Gall bladder-gonad GAP 10.4 4.2 3.6
Gall bladder-kidney GAP 20.4 19.1 15.6
Gonad-kidney GAP 1.8 3.7 6.1
Kidney-vent INT 12.3 14.3 13.6
Rectal caecum-vent INT 7.8 9 10
Tracheal lung MP 19.9 18.5 18.2
(D)
Heart MP-Right lung MP INT 11 12.8 12.2
Heart MP-Liver MP INT 17.7 18.2 20.7
Liver MP-Kidney MP INT 42.5 41.6 38.9
Heart MP-Gonad MP INT 49 44.2 46.8
Trachea/bronchus MP-Kidney MP INT 70.6 68.2 68.2
(E)
Right liver segments 9.8 8.4 6.4
Right testis segments 1 5.5 4
Left testis segments 1 4.8 3.7
Total testis segments 2 10.3 7.7
(F)
Posterior liver tail/liver 0.08 0.12 0.17
Left liver/right liver 1.04 0.89 0.94
Diagnosis. Rhinotyphlops can be distinguished from all other typhlopoids by the combination of the following characters: snout with sharply pointed lateral profile, T-0 SIP (T-II in Rh. schinzi ), 22–34 midbody scale rows, pigmented dorsum and absence of left lung. Small- to large-sized (total length 90–455 mm ), stout- to slenderbodied (length/width ratio 27–88) snakes with 22–34 scale rows (with reduction), 311–586 total middorsals, short to moderate tail (0.6–2.3% total length) with 6–13 subcaudals (length/width ratio 0.5–1.5), and apical spine minute. Moderate to broad rostral (0.54–0.85 head width), inferior nasal suture in contact with first or second supralabial, preocular in contact with second or second and third supralabials, and postoculars 2–5. Lateral tongue papillae present; left lung absent, tracheal, cardiac and right lungs multicameral (with 24–47 + 1–8 + 2–10 chambers, respectively); testes unsegmented, hemipenis eversible, lacking retrocloacal sacs; and rectal caecum moderate (1.4–3.8% SVL). Coloration dark brown to blackish-brown above and below (with or without a yellow vertebral stripe) or dorsum light with irregular dark pigmentation and light venter. Phylogenetic definition. Includes the MRCA of Rhinotyphlops lalandei and Rh. unitaeniata and all descendants thereof, and all species more closely related to Rh. lalandei than to the type species of the 15 other typhlopid genera listed here. Etymology. Likely refers to enlarged rostral (Greek rhinos for nose) of the type species, R. lalandei . Distribution. Range includes much of sub-Saharan Africa. Remarks. The species Rhinotyphlops lalandei is also the type species of Onychocephalus described by Duméril & Bibron (1844) , which is in the synonymy of several other genera listed here ( McDiarmid et al. 1999 ; Wallach et al. 2014), but Rhinotyphlops has priority over Onychocephalus . Note that Hedges et al. (2014) included Madatyphlops leucocephalus in Rhinotyphlops , but it is apparently allied with Madatyphlops based on SIP (T-V vs. T-0 or T-II in Rhinotyphlops ), fourth supralabial and its orientation (high and vertical vs. low and horizontal in Rhinotyphlops ), and rostral width (<50% of head width vs. 54%–85% in Rhinotyphlops ).