Revision of the Oriental species of the genus Neodryinus Perkins 1905 (Hymenoptera: Dryinidae: Gonatopodinae), with description of a new species from China Author Xu, Zaifu Author Olmi, Massimo Author He, Junhua text Zootaxa 2011 2790 1 22 journal article 10.5281/zenodo.205419 66477d65-fcd4-4e06-b282-331ea9befb04 1175-5326 205419 Key to the Oriental species of Neodryinus Females (unknown in N. baishanzuensis and N. phuphayonensis ) 1 Notauli present, complete or incomplete.................................................................... 2 - Notauli absent....................................................................................... 6 2 Segment 5 of fore tarsus with less than 20 medial lamellae ( Figs 18 , 21 ).......................................... 3 - Segment 5 of fore tarsus with more than 20 medial lamellae ( Figs 2 , 10 , 14 )....................................... 4 3 Segment 5 of fore tarsus with 2 rows of lamellae ( Fig. 21 ); disc of pronotum very humped, without a posterior transverse impression ( Fig. 20 )............................................................. 13. N. pseudodiffusus Olmi - Segment 5 of fore tarsus with 1 row of lamellae ( Fig. 18 ); disc of pronotum less humped, almost flat, with a hardly visible pos- terior transverse impression ( Fig. 17 ).................................................. 11. N. malayanus (Olmi) 4 Notauli incomplete.................................................................7. N. isoneurus Xu et He - Notauli complete..................................................................................... 5 5 Pronotum granulated, smooth, not sculptured by longitudinal keels; face granulated and irregularly rugose. 2. N. beaveri Olmi - Pronotum granulated and with anterior collar, disc and lateral regions sculptured by numerous longitudinal and parallel keels; face granulated and with numerous parallel and longitudinal keels....................... 10. N. lineatus Xu, Olmi et He 6 Pronotum with a posterior transverse impression in addition to the anterior impression ( Fig. 4 ); anterior impression little deep.................................................................................. 9. N. leptopus Richards - Pronotum only with an anterior transverse impression, without a posterior impression ( Fig. 3 ); anterior impression very deep..................................................................................................... 7 7 Enlarged claw with a very small subapical tooth situated very far from the distal apex ( Fig. 27 ).... 17. N. taiwanensis Olmi - Enlarged claw with a small or very large subapical tooth situated very near the distal apex ( Figs 5, 6 , 8, 9 , 11 , 18 , 21, 23 , 25, 26 )................................................................................................ 8 8 Occipital carina absent.............................................................. 14. N. reticulatus (Fouts) - Occipital carina distinct and incomplete.................................................................... 9 9 Occipital carina distinct on the sides of the posterior ocelli, but not extending beyond 0.5 length of OOL............... 10 - Occipital carina distinct on the sides of the posterior ocelli, at least reaching 0.5 length of OOL....................... 13 10 Enlarged claw less tapering, with subapical tooth very big and prominent ( Fig. 5 )................... 3. N. chelatus Olmi - Enlarged claw more tapering, with subapical tooth smaller and less prominent ( Figs 8 , 25, 26 )....................... 11 11 Legs totally or mostly reddish..................................................... 16. N. sumatranus Enderlein - Legs black-brown.................................................................................... 12 12 Enlarged claw more tapering ( Fig. 8 )....................................................... 5. N. dolosus Olmi - Enlarged claw less tapering ( Fig. 25 )...................................................... 15. N. robustus Olmi 13 Scutum granulated, very hairy, not reticulate rugose, without longitudinal keels.................. 8. N. javanus (Roepke) - Scutum completely reticulate rugose, or mostly sculptured by numerous longitudinal keels.......................... 14 14 Scutum sculptured by numerous longitudinal keels and with a narrow median region reticulate rugose; enlarged claw with a very large subapical tooth ( Fig. 5 ).......................................................... 3. N. chelatus Olmi - Scutum completely reticulate rugose; enlarged claw with a large or small subapical tooth ( Figs 6 , 9 , 18 , 21 )............ 15 15 Head with face sculptured by numerous parallel longitudinal keels............................. 6. N. grandis sp. nov. - Head with face reticulate rugose, not sculptured by numerous parallel longitudinal keels............................ 16 16 Enlarged claw with a small subapical tooth ( Fig. 6 ).............................................4. N. diffusus Olmi - Enlarged claw with a large subapical tooth ( Figs 18 , 21 )..................................................... 17 17 Segment 5 of fore tarsus with 2 rows of lamellae ( Fig. 21 ); disc of pronotum very humped, without a track of a posterior trans- verse impression ( Fig. 20 )......................................................... 13. N. pseudodiffusus Olmi - Segment 5 of fore tarsus with 1 row of lamellae ( Fig. 18 ); disc of pronotum less humped, almost flat, with a track of a posterior transverse impression ( Fig. 17 )........................................................ 11. N. malayanus (Olmi)