Disentangling the diversity and taxonomy of Hymenophyllaceae (Hymenophyllales, Polypodiidae) in the Comoros
Author
Ahamada H. Saïd
Author
Sabine Hennequin
Author
Germinal Rouhan
Author
Jean-Yves Dubuisson
text
European Journal of Taxonomy
2017
2017-04-28
313
1
53
journal article
32053
10.5852/ejt.2017.313
e9b8382f-faec-4925-993b-f13e4cfa2a71
2118-9773
896401
Hymenophyllum kuhnii
C.Chr.
Hymenophyllum kuhnii
C.Chr.
,
Index filicum
: 363 (1905), nom. nov. for
H. meyeri
Kuhn (
in
Engler 1892
: 94)
, non
C.Presl (1843: 31, 50)
. – Type: As for
H. meyeri
Kuhn
in
Engler
,
Über
die Hochgebirgsflora des tropischen Afrika
: 94 (1892), nom. superfl., non
C.Presl (1843: 31, 50)
, ‘am Ruabach 1900–2300 m’,
H. Meyer 310
(lecto-: B200092787!; isolecto-: B200092783!, B200092784!designated by
Beentje 2008
); ‘Kilimandscharo, im Urwald am Südabhang massenhaft von 1930–2800 m’,
R.F.X.R. von Höhnel 146
(syn-: B200092785),
R.F.X.R. von Höhnel 147
(syn-: B200092782, B200092786!),
O. Ehlers 66
(syn-: B200092790); ‘im oberen Urwald um 2500 m, Aug. 1881’,
H. Meyer s.n.
(syn-: not located); ‘am Ruabach 1900–2300 m, Nov. 1889’,
H.Meyer s.n.
(B200092788!).
Hymenophyllum henkelii
Sim
,
South African Journal of Science
20: 309, pl. 9 (1923). – Type: Rhodesia,
I.S. Henkel
sub.
F. Eyles 2559
(holo-: K0004356000!).
Mecodium kuhnii
(C.Chr.) Copel.,
The Philippine
Journal of Science
67 (1): 19 (1938).
Hymenophyllum polyanthos
(Sw.) Sw. var.
kuhnii
(C.Chr.) Schelpe,
Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana
, sér. 2, 40: 156 (1966).
Short description
Epiphytic; long-creeping filiform rhizomes, bearing sparsely distributed roots and long reddish brown trichomes, and widely separated pending fronds; fronds stipitate, and stipes and rachises fully winged, with stipe wing usually well-developed (> 3 cells wide), up to 20 cm long (in Comoros), glabrous, quite variable in shape, lanceolate to oblong, sometimes widely ovate, pinnate-pinnatifid to bipinnatepinnatifid, with lamina apices attenuate to obtuse or rounded; pinnae often overlapping especially in widely ovate fronds; numerous sori, paratactic, bilabiate without a developed base.
Global distribution
Central Africa, East and South-Africa, Madagascar, Comoros, La Réunion?, Mauritius?
Distribution in Comoros
Grande Comore, Mohéli.
Additional specimens examined
COMOROS: GRANDE COMORE, Changani, Forêt de Changani, 16 Nov. 1999,
J.N.Labat et al. 3146
(P00184014); La Convalescence, 24 Nov. 2002,
F.Rakotondrainibe et al. 6791
(P00312067); Massif du Karthala (versant sud), 2 Dec. 2002,
F.Rakotondrainibe et al. 6864
(P00312328); Hantsangoma, sur les pentes autour du lac, 19 Oct. 2008,
G.Rouhan et al. 742
(P02439802); Massif de La Grille, bord de la piste menant au pylône, 9 Nov. 2008,
M.Pignal et al. 3512
(P02433494); Nfudo ya Mdrunda, au-dessus du village de Tsinimwapanga, en chemin vers le second point de récolte, 29 Nov. 2009,
C.Loup et al. 550
(P02439779). MOHÉLI, Piste entre Miringoni et le Chalet St Antoine, 4 Nov. 2008,
G.Rouhan et al. 897
(P02439807).
Note
All the specimens we examined were most often identified as
H. polyanthos
.
Hennequin
et al.
(2006)
nevertheless demonstrated that paleotropical
H. polyanthos
populations are molecularly clearly distinct from neotropical
H. polyanthos
which might rather be restricted to the Neotropics (type from Jamaica). Specimens known as
H. polyanthos
in Comoros and Madagascar (in addition to some African specimens) do not significantly differ from African
H. kuhnii
(which was also considered as a variety of
H. polyanthos
by Schelpe in 1966), agreeing with the detailed treatment given by
Kornaś (1993)
, and the identifications of Malagasy specimens as
H. polyanthos
var.
kuhnii
by F. Rakotondrainibe (e.g.,
F.Rakotondrainibe 2569
- P00059741,
1356
- P00064677,
2542
- P00046641).
Hymenophyllum kuhnii
initially considered as distributed from South Africa to Tanzania is quite variable in size, shape and frond division. The frond can reach 50 cm long and be pinnate-pinnatifid to bipinnate-pinnatifid, lanceolate to linear with short to long pinnae (<6 cm) and often oblong (especially after specimens at B, including the types;
Fig. 5C
).
Hymenophyllum capense
and specimens usually named
H. polyanthos
in the western Indian Ocean share the same gross morphology as continental
H. kuhnii
(see
Fig. 5A–B
). They would differ in the frond length, shape and division. Fronds of
H. capense
exceptionally exceed 15 cm long and are linear to oblong and usually not more than pinnate-pinnatifid (
Fig. 5B
) while most
H.
‘
polyanthos
’ can reach 20 cm long with lamina lanceolate to ovate, less often oblong, pinnatepinnatifid to bipinnate-pinnatifid (
Fig. 5A
). Because of morphologically intermediate specimens for which identifications are necessarily uncertain (e.g.,
F.Rakotondrainibe 6791
- P00312067), we suspect that the three supposed distinct morpho-species could cover the whole high variability of a single taxon (here
H. capense
according to anteriority), according to lamina division and shape. We propose thus here to name
H. kuhnii
the Comorian specimens usually identified as
H. polyanthos
, a treatment that could also be applied to Malagasy specimens. Additional investigations including molecular data are requested to precise the specific status of these taxa (including
H. capense
). In absence of these studies, we nevertheless consider here
H. capense
as distinct, but not ruling out that such specimens could be dwarf forms of
H. kuhnii
(see
Fig. 5A–C
). If further additional studies confirm that
H. capense
specimens are dwarf forms of
H. kuhnii
, all populations identified as
H. kuhnii
should thus be named
H. capense
.