The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus
Author
Fikáček, Martin
Department of Biological Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, No. 70, Lienhai Rd., Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan; & Department of Entomology, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740 CZ- 19300 Praha & Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná
Author
Matsumoto, Keita
Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, SW
Author
Perkins, Philip
BD, United Kingdom;
Author
Prokin, Alexander
Author
Sazhnev, Alexey
Author
Litovkin, Stanislav
CZ- 12844, Praha
Author
Jäch, Manfred A.
text
Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae
2021
Acta. Ent. Mus. Natl. Pragae
2021-02-03
61
1
1
34
http://dx.doi.org/10.37520/aemnp.2021.001
journal article
10.37520/aemnp.2021.001
1804-6487
5037206
9CB2C16A-E2B7-4C17-A310-D538AA061911
Eupotemus taianus
sp. nov.
(
Figs 11D–F
,
12G–I
)
Material examined.
Hඈඅඈඍඒඉൾ: J (DNA voucher MF2248) (
BMNH
): ʽCÔTE D’IVOIRE,
174m
, / Taï NP, Taï Research Station / (
SRET
) /
05°50’00”N
07°20’32.0”W
, /
25.III-17.IV. 2017
, MV light // Aristophanous,A., / Aristophanous, M., / Geiser, M., Moretto, P., leg., / BMNH(E) 2019-93ʼ.
Differential diagnosis.
Very similar to the other species of the
E. carinaticollis
species group from which it can
Fig. 12. Habitus photographs of the species of the
Eupotemus carinaticollis
species group, holotypes: A–C –
E. carinaticollis
(
Basilewsky, 1956
)
; D–F –
E. uluguru
sp. nov.
; G–I –
E. taianus
sp. nov.
Fig. 13. Known distribution of
Eupotemus
species.A
– species of
E. limicola
species group; B – species of
E. carinaticollis
species group.
Table 4. Differences of the aedeagi of the
Eupotemus carinaticollis
group.
E. carinaticollis
|
E. uluguru
sp. nov.
|
E. taianus
sp. nov.
|
Median lobe proportions |
Narrow |
Narrow |
Wide |
(length to width) |
(>3× longer than wide). |
(>3× longer than wide). |
(<3× longer than wide). |
Sides of median lobe sub- |
Straight to very weakly |
Straight to weakly |
Strongly convex. |
apically |
convex. |
concave. |
Apex of parameres in dorsal |
Constricted subapically, |
Not constricted, narrow |
Constricted subapically, |
view |
widened at apex. |
at apex. |
widened at apex. |
be reliably distinguished by the male genitalia only. The aedeagus resembles that of
E. carinaticollis
by the subapically constricted and apically widened parameres but differs in the wider median lobe with convex sides subapically. From
E. uluguru
it differs in the apically widened parameres.
Description.
Body
2.8 mm
long and
1.5 mm
wide. Dorsal surface black. Habitus and sculpture as in
Figs 12G–I
; ridge on elytral interval 3 complete throughout; ridge on interval 5 interrupted posteriorly; ridge on interval 7 interrupted in posterior fourth. Elytral punctures connected by low elevated line. Aedeagus (11D–F):
0.90 mm
long. Parameres ca. 2.0× longer than phallobase, indistinctly constricted at midlength, strongly constricted subapically, apex widened. Median lobe 2.5× longer than wide, narrowing from midlength to apex, sides convex subapically. Phallobase basally with narrow symmetrical manubrium.
Etylomogy.
The species name refers to the Taï National Park in which the only known specimen of this species was collected. Adjective.
Biology.
Unknown, collected at light.
Distribution.
Known only from the
type
locality in southwestern
Côte d’Ivoire
(
Fig. 13B
).