Phylleremus n. gen., from leaves of deciduous trees in eastern Australia (Oribatida: Licneremaeoidea)
Author
Behan-Pelletier, Valerie M.
Author
Walter, David E.
text
Zootaxa
2007
1386
1
17
journal article
10.5281/zenodo.175132
8dacef77-cc64-40d3-92ad-be6e928111e2
11755326
175132
Phylleremus leei
n. sp.
Material examined.
Holotype
:
adult female.
Australia
:
NSW
: Mt. Warning National Park,
28º23’S
,
153º17’E
;
15. iii. 1991
, from leaves of
Sarcopteryx stipata
(F. Muell.) Radlk.
; deposited in the
ANIC
.
Paratypes
: 3 with same data as
holotype
;
Australia
:
NSW
: Border Ranges National Park,
Antarctic
Beech site,
28º22’S
,
153º07’E
,
22.ii.1992
, 1 from leaf of
Caldcluvia paniculosa
;
NSW
: New
England
National Park,
30º30’S
,
152º26’E
, Cascade Trail,
16.vi.1991
,
1 male
from
Vesselowskya rubifolia
;
NSW
: nr. Armidale, New
England
National Park,
30º30’S
,
152º26’E
, Point Lookout,
1563m
,
15.vi.1991
,
1 female
from
Banksia collina
;
NSW
: nr. Nimbin Nightcap National Park, Mt. Matheson,
28º32’S
,
153º16’E
,
700m
,
23.vi.1991
,
1 female
from
Sloanea australis
;
NSW
: nr. Kyogle Border Ranges National Park,
28º22’S
,
153º07’E
, Forest Top Rest area,
18.vi.1991
, 6 tritonymphs from
Sloanea woolsii
;
NSW
: Washpool National Park,
29º28’S
,
152º18’E
, Coombadja Creek,
23.vi.1991
, 1 DN, 1TN from leaf of
Callicoma serratifolia
; QLD: Lamington National Forest,
28º13’S
,
153º09’E
, O’Reilly’s Guest House,
19.ii.1992
, 1 from leaf of
Randia benthamiana
; Mick’s Tower,
17.v.1994
,
3 females
1 males
from stem of
Randia benthamiana
;
Victoria: Wilson’s Promontory National Park, Chinaman Creek,
38º55’S
,
146º23’E
,
17.x.1991
,
3 males
,
2 females
4 nymphs from leaf
Olearia lirata
; Victoria: E. Gippsland, Errinundra Plateau,
37º21’S
,
148º51’E
,
19.ii.1991
, from
Elaeocarpus reticulatus
; deposited in the
ANIC
and
CNC
.
FIGURES 4–7.
Phylleremus leei
n. sp
.
, scanning electron micrographs of adult females: 4, lateral aspect; 5, frontal aspect; 6, detail of lateral view of prodorsum with taenidium indicated by arrow; 7, posterior aspect showing overlapping notogastral tectum.
FIGURES 8–11.
Phylleremus leei
n. sp.
, legs of adult female, all abaxial aspect: 8, leg I (trochanter removed); 9, leg II (trochanter removed); 10, leg III (solenidion φ broken from tibia); 11, leg IV.
Diagnosis
. Total length of adults 280–332μm; mutual distance of tubercles on notogaster about 3–8 µm; setae
le
about 14–16 µm long; setae
ex
about 8–10 µm long; saccule Sa present, S1, S2, S3 absent; six pairs of genital setae.
Description.
Adult.
Measurements: Mean total length: female (
n
= 9) 322 µm (range 308–332); male (
n
= 2) 291 µm (280, 296). Mean notogastral width: female (
n
=8) 184 µm (range 172–192); male (
n
=2) 152 µm (152, 152).
Color: Mature adults brown.
Integument: Underlying microtubercles on all sclerotized integument. Notogaster with large flattened tubercles extending almost to margin of notogaster laterally, shape circular to oval, circular tubercles about 5 µm in diameter, oval tubercles about 5–8 µm long; tubercles irregularly spaced, mutual distance about 3–8 µm. Tubercles extending almost to margin of notogaster laterally.
Prodorsum: Rostrum rounded. Weak transverse ridges present between setae
ro
and
le
and laterally on prodorsum (
Figs 4, 5
). Longitudinal ridges extending between setae
le
and
in
transverse or Ushaped ridge anterior to setae
in
(
Fig. 1
). Development of transverse or Ushaped ridge varies from poorly to welldeveloped within populations. Setae
ro
28–38 µm long, barbed along length, except smooth basally, acuminate, mutual distance at base about 22 µm. Setae
le
about 14–16 µm long, thin, barbed, tapered, mutual distance of pair about 30–36 µm. Setae
in
30–36 µm long, thick, plumose, flattened to abruptly tapered distally; mutual distance of pair 40–54 µm. Bothridial setae 24–28 µm long, with finely barbed globular head, subequal in length to narrow stalk. Bothridium with internal ringlike ridges. Exobothridial setae about 8–10 µm long, thin, smooth, tapered (
Figs 3
,
6
).
Lateral Region: Pedotectum I covering posterior half of acetabulum I, narrowing along length, curving dorsally to level of seta
ex
and merging with taenidium (
Fig. 3
).
Notogaster: Longer than wide, ratio about 1.3:1.0. All nine pairs of notogastral setae about
16 m
long, curved posteriorly to posterolaterally, barbed along length, except smooth basally, acuminate (
Fig. 1
). Saccule Sa very small, positioned anteriorly on notogaster, far anterior to seta
c
, dorsal to porose area Ad, about
11 m
long (
Fig. 1
). Saccules S1, S2 and S3 absent.
Ventral Region: With short ridges in coxisternal region, on genital plates, and surrounding genital and anal plates (
Fig. 2
). Six pairs of genital setae. Epimeral and genital setae smooth, acuminate, about
16 m
long. Aggenital, anal and adanal setae about
11 m
long, smooth, acuminate.
Gnathosoma: Mentum with fingerprint pattern laterally (
Fig. 2
). Subcapitular setae
a, m
and
h
smooth, tapered, relative lengths:
h> m> a
.
Legs: Leg segments, other than genua, with 10–20 ridges running dorsoventrally (
Figs 8–11
). Claws of legs I and II proportionally larger than those on legs III and IV; all claws with small spines proximodorsally (
Figs 15, 16
). Pulvilli of tarsi I and II smaller than those of tarsi III, IV (
Figs 8–11
,
15, 16
). Leg setal formulae (trochanter to tarsus): leg I, 153(1)4(2)18(2); leg II, 153(1)3(1)15(2); leg III, 221(1)3(1)13; leg IV, 1213(1)12. Setae (
v
) not developed on tarsus I, and (
it
) not developed on tarsus III. Seta
tc”
absent unilaterally from tarsus IV on one specimen (illustrated in
Fig. 11
).
Description.
Immatures
. Measurements: Mean length: larva (
n
= 1) 195 µm; protonymph (
n
= 1) 200 µm; deutonymph (
n
= 2) 247 µm (240, 254); tritonymph (
n
= 6) 288 µm (range 270–296).
Tritonymph
. Prodorsum: Aspis with transverse porose area posterior to setae
in
and bothridia. Lateral porose areas present anterior of bothridia, broadest posteriorly, narrowing anteriorly (
Fig. 12
). Seta
ro
finely barbed along length, about 20 µm long. Seta
le
thin, smooth, about 8 µm long. Seta
in
about 25 µm long, thick, barbed, tapered. Setal pairs
ro, le
and
in
about 13, 16 and 36 µm apart, respectively. Seta
ex
about 5 µm long, smooth. Bothridial seta about 20 µm long, globular, head subequal in length to stalk, identical in shape to that of adult.
Gastronotic Region: Integument of plicae alternatively slightly sclerotized and unsclerotized, slight sclerotization indicated by stippling on
Fig. 12
. Gastronotal setae
c, l,
and
h
series about 15 µm long, with minute barbs. Gastronotal setae of
d
series and
p1
and
p2
short, thin, tapered, about
5–8 m
long (
Fig. 12
).
Ventral Region: Medial margins of epimeral plates weakly defined (
Fig. 13
). Epimere I with narrow mentotectum, greatest width about 5 µm, overlying base of subcapitulum (
Fig. 13
). Epimeral, genital, aggenital, anal and adanal setae smooth, acuminate, about 5–13 µm long, with seta
1b
longest. Integument of genital region weakly sclerotized. Development of epimeral setae (protonymph–adult): 3121, 3122, 3122, 3 122. Development of genital, aggenital, anal and adanal setae (protonymph–adult): 1356, 0111, 002 2, 0222, respectively.
FIGURES 12–14.
Phylleremus leei
n. sp.
, immatures; 12, tritonymph, dorsal aspect, 13, tritonymph, ventral aspect (gnathosoma incomplete; legs I and II represented only by trochanters and femora, legs III and IV removed); 14, larva, dorsal aspect.
Legs: Development of setae and solenidia given in
Table 1
. Proral setae of tarsus I appear eupathidial in all nymphal instars. Subunguinal seta of tarsus I of normal form and inserted proximal to antelateral pair in all nymphs; becoming eupathidial in adult, and moving distal to antelateral pair. Porose areas on femora I to IV clearly present. Tarsal pulvilli present in all instars.
Protonymph and deutonymph
.
As
for tritonymph except overall size and length of setae proportionally shorter.
Larva
.
As
for tritonymph, except overall size and length of setae proportionally shorter. Seta
c2
barbed, about 13 µm, other gastronotal setae, smooth, about 8 µm long (
Fig. 14
).
Etymology.
The specific epithet is in honour of our deceased colleague and friend, Dr. David Lee, who contributed so much to our knowledge of Australian acarology.