A new species of Mud Snake (Serpentes, Homalopsidae, Gyiophis Murphy & Voris, 2014) from Myanmar with a first molecular phylogenetic assessment of the genus
Author
Quah, Evan S. H.
Author
Grismer, L. Lee
Author
Wood, Perry L.
Author
Thura, Myint Kyaw
Author
Zin, Thaw
Author
Kyaw, Htet
Author
Lwin, Ngwe
Author
Grismer, Marta S.
Author
Murdoch, Matthew L.
text
Zootaxa
2017
4238
4
571
582
journal article
36329
10.11646/zootaxa.4238.4.5
e17e2c89-bf5a-4747-8af1-3ab31d497bd1
1175-5326
375507
8070D6DA-F5DB-4612-A768-2A61D56A2B70
Gyiophis salweenensis
sp. nov.
Salween River Basin Mud Snake
Figs. 2–4
.
Holotype
.
Adult
female
(
LSUHC 12960
) collected on
8 October 2016
by
Myint Kyaw Thura
,
Thaw Zin
,
Evan S.H. Quah
,
L. Lee Grismer
,
Perry L. Wood, Jr.
,
Marta S. Grismer
,
Matthew L. Murdoch
and
Htet Kyaw
from
close to Sanpel Cave, Mawlamyine
,
Mon State
,
Myanmar
(
N16°22.427
,
E97°46.388
;
44 m
in elevation).
Diagnosis.
Gyiophis salweenensis
sp. nov.
is separated from all congeners by having a unique combination of the following characters: a narrow rostral scale; the first three dorsal scale rows square; 129 (female) ventral scales; 30/29 (female) paired subcaudals; a divided cloacal plate; eight or nine supralabials; 10 infralabials; a maximum total length of
416 mm
; relative tail length ratio of 0.13; a ventral patterning lacking a central spot on each ventral scale; the presence of a faint stripe on the lower, dorsal scale rows; and four rows of dark spots on the dorsum (
Table 1
).
TABLE 1.
Comparison of the scalation and colour pattern in
G. maculosa
,
G. vorisi
and
G. salweenensis
sp. nov.
*data obtained from Murphy 2007b, – no data available.
Characteristics Scale rows on neck (ASR) |
Gyiophis maculosa
* (N=1) 25
|
Gyiophis vorisi
* (N=11) 26–28
|
Gyiophis salweenensis
sp. nov.
(N=1) 26
|
Scale rows at mid-body (MSR) Scale rows near vent (PSR) Scale shape in first 3 rows |
25 22 Ovate |
25 21–23 Square |
25 20 Square |
Supralabials Ventral scales in males Ventral scales in females |
8 - 122 |
8 147– 152 142–148 |
9/8 - 129 |
Subcaudal scales in males Subcaudal scales in females Central spot on each ventral |
- 32/31 Present |
51–58 41–53 None |
- 30/29 None |
Stripe on dorsal rows 2–4 Number of rows of spots on the dorsum Width of rostral scale |
Absent 5–6 Narrow |
Present 3 Broad |
Present (Faint) 4 Narrow |
Description of
holotype
(
Figs. 3–4
).
Head depressed, distinct from neck; snout short and rounded, rostrum tapers downwards; rostral scale pentagonal, nearly as broad as tall, visible from above; eye moderate in size, pupils rounded; nasals semi-divided with nasal groove contacting first supralabial, nare in center (on left side of snout is a small, aberrant, triangular scale positioned between rostral, nasal and first supralabial); internasal small, quadrangular, not in contact with loreal; loreal 1/1, quadrangular, contacting first three supralabials on right side and supralabials 1, 2 and 4 on left side; preocular 1/1; supraocular 1/1; postoculars 2/2; prefrontals 2, in broad contact with each other, frontal, internasal, loreals, preoculars, supraoculars, and posterior tip of nasals; frontal pentagonal, 1.4 times longer than supraocular; parietals elongate; temporal scale formula 1 + 2 + 3; supralabials 9/ 8, largest supralabial 7/6, smallest 3/8, supralabial entering orbit 5/4 (on left side of head there is fragmentation of supralabial scales with third supralabial being small and sandwiched beneath second and fourth supralabials (
Fig. 4
b); infralabials 10/10, seventh elongate, first four in contact with anterior chin shield; anterior pair of chin shields largest and rounded, second pair small; 26 ASR, 25 MSR, 20 PSR; scales of first three rows of dorsal scales square; 129 ventrals; cloacal plate divided; subcaudal scales 30/29. Body short, somewhat stocky; tail short; SVL
364 mm
; TaL
52mm
; TL
416mm
. There is a puncture wound on the right side of the dorsum at the position of ventral 63.
Colouration in life (
Figs. 2–4
).
The colour of each ventral and subcaudal scale is uniform cream with dark edging on the anterior right and left corners of each scale. These markings merge with the dark spot on the anterior half of each scale of the first dorsal scale row and some on the second row of dorsal scales to form a zig-zag stripe along the dorsoventral edge that runs the length of the body and tail. There are no central spots on the ventral scales except for ventrals 21, 54 and 55 that are extensions of the dark edgings of the corners of the scales. The chin and throat are cream and the infralabials, chin shields, and scales on the throat are edged in dark-grey. The posterior portion of dorsal scale rows one, two, three, and four form a faint cream stripe that is most prominent on the anterior portion on the body near the jaw and neck. The ground colour of the top of the head and the dorsum is greyish-brown. On dorsal scale rows 5–7 there are a series of large black spots 3–7 scales wide along the flanks and the anterior portion of the body near the neck. Some of these spots merge to form an irregularly shaped stripe. On the back are two rows of smaller black spots approximately 2–4 scales in width and usually on dorsal scale rows 11–14 and rows 15–17. Some single, darker scales are interspersed along the body on dorsal scale rows nine or 10. The tail is greyish brown with black spots. The head is speckled with small dark-grey spots with some larger spots; one on the frontal; another beneath the eye on the lower postocular and supralabials 4/5 and six. There is a broad dark-coloured streak across the anterior temporal, lower middle temporal, and the seventh and eighth supralabials; one at the corner of the jaw; and another two-scale wide streak on the crown from the posterior tip of the parietals extending posteriorly the length of five dorsal scales. The supralabials are cream and edged in dark-grey.
Distribution (
Fig. 2
).
Gyiophis salweenensis
sp. nov.
is only known from the
type
locality near Sanpel Cave,
Mon
State,
Myanmar
. It is expected to be wider ranging throughout the Salween River Basin and found wherever appropriate habitat occurs.
Natural history (
Fig. 5
).
The
holotype
was found at approximately 1930 hours crossing a narrow dirt road between flooded fields that we presume to be its natural habitat. The weather was overcast and it rained later that night. Many other species of homalopsids are semiaquatic and commonly found in streams, rivers, ponds, and flooded rice fields (
Murphy 2007a
;
Stuebing
et al
. 2014
).
Gyiophis salweenensis
sp. nov.
is expected to share a similar life history and the valvular nostrils located dorsally on the snout indicate this species probably spends a large part of its life in the water. Homalopsid snakes such as
Enhydris enhydris
,
Homalopsis buccata
(
Linnaeus, 1758
)
and
Hypsiscopus plumbea
have been observed crawling on land and crossing roads during wet weather (
Voris & Karns 1996
; Lim & D’Rozario 2009; EQSH personal obs.) and the
holotype
of
G. salweenensis
sp. nov.
could have been dispersing to a new area as well. The
holotype
also had a puncture wound on its back which might have come from an encounter with a predator such as a heron.
Etymology.
The specific epithet
salweenensis
is in reference to area where the
holotype
was found which is close to the vicinity of the Salween River near the city of Mawlamyine. The suffix
ensis
is a Latin derivation meaning “from” or “inhabiting.” It renders the specific epithet an adjective that must be in grammatical accord with the gender of
Gyiophis
.
Comparison.
Gyiophis salweenensis
sp. nov.
is distinguishable from
G. maculosa
by the shape of the dorsal scales of first three rows (square vs. ovate), the ventral scale pattern (absence of a central spot on each ventral scale vs. its presence), and a stripe running through the scales of the lower dorsal scale row (faint one vs. absent). It is further distinguished from
G. vorisi
by its lower number of ventrals (129 vs. 142–152), lower number of subcaudals (30/29 vs. 41–58), shape of the rostral scale (narrow vs. broad), and the number of rows of spots on the dorsum (four vs. three) (
Table 1
). It differs from the other species of homalopsids found in
Myanmar
by unique suite of characters presented in the key below.