Two new species of Philopteroides (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera: Philopteridae) of the beckeri species-group, from New Guinean painted berrypeckers (Aves: Passeriformes: Paramythiidae)
Author
Najer, Tomas
Author
Gustafsson, Daniel R.
Author
Sychra, Oldrich
text
Zootaxa
2016
4139
4
527
541
journal article
10.11646/zootaxa.4139.4.5
f0ce29b9-68f9-446b-8df4-32228b2f3fe0
1175-5326
265597
82CE664F-0850-4523-8509-A74CC406424D
Philopteroides sinancorellus
Najer, Gustafsson & Sychra
,
new species
(
Figs 3
,
5
,
7
A–B.
Tables 1–2
,
5
)
Type
host.
Oreocharis arfaki
(Meyer, 1875)
(
Passeriformes
:
Paramythiidae
)—tit berrypecker.
Type
locality.
Morobe
District,
Papua New Guinea
.
Diagnosis.
Philopteroides sinancorellus
keys out to
Ph
. beckeri
(
Mey, 2004
) in Valim
& Palma’s (2013) key, but our new species differs from
Ph
. beckeri
in the following characters: (1) marginal carina interrupted laterally in
Ph
. sinancorellus
(
Fig. 3
C), not in
Ph
. beckeri
; (2) spine-like sternal setae absent in
Ph
. sinancorellus
(
Figs 3
A, E), present in
Ph
. beckeri
; (3) male genitalia more elongated in
Ph
. sinancorellus
(
Fig. 3
D) than in
Ph
. beckeri
. Furthermore,
Philopteroides sinancorellus
differs from
Ph
. gigas
new species
(see below), in the following characters: (1) fewer setae on thoracic and abdominal segments of
Ph
. sinancorellus
(
Tables 1
,
2
) than on those of
Ph
. gigas
(
Tables 3
,
4
); (2) parameres very small, visible as slight protuberances in
Ph
. sinancorellus
(
Fig. 3
D) but long and conical in
Ph
. gigas
(
Fig. 4
D); (3) dorsal anterior plate as in
Fig. 3
B in
Ph
. sinancorellus
, with oblique and slightly concave postero-lateral margins; (4) ventral head plate quadrangular with concave lateral margins in
Ph
. sinancorellus
(
Figs 3
A–C, E) but trapezoidal in
Ph
. gigas
(
Figs 4
A–C, E); (5) frons without any visible sclerotization in
Ph
. sinancorellus
(
Figs 3
A–C, E) but sclerotized in
Ph
. gigas
(
Figs 4
A–C, E); (6) smaller dimensions in
Ph
. sinancorellus
than those of
Ph
. gigas
(
Table 5
); (7) female sternites entire, without any visible lateral sternites in
Ph
. sinancorellus
(
Fig. 3
E), with lateral sternites in
Ph
. gigas
(
Fig. 4
E); (8) fewer and shorter sternal setae in
Ph
. sinancorellus
(
Figs 3
A, E;
Tables 1
,
2
) than in
Ph
. gigas
(
Fig. 4
A, E;
Tables 3
,
4
); (9) female subgenital plate of
Ph
. sinancorellus
shaped as in
Figs 3
E, F, with posterior and lateral margin connected in apparent right angle, long setae present on this angle always with gap between them on each side, but those of
Ph
. gigas
shaped as in
Figs 4
E, F, with oblique, slightly concave postero-lateral margin, without any apparent angle and with the setae close to each other.
TABLE 1.
Abdominal chaetotaxy for male
Philopteroides sinancorellus
n. sp.
Numbers in parentheses are modes. Due to the condition of some specimens, it was not possible to count all the setae. Digits separated by a plus sign denote segments that have two sets of setae (anterior and posterior for tergocentral; long and short for sternal). Sternal code: l = long; s = short; s/l = variable length. Letters in parentheses under sternal code refer to missing setae in some specimens.
Segment |
Tergocentral |
Paratergal |
Sternal number |
Sternal code |
II |
1–2 + 1–3 (1 +?) |
0 |
3–4 + 2–2 (3 + 2) |
lls–sl(l) |
III |
3–4 |
0 |
2–3 + 1–2 (? + 2) |
ls–sl(l) |
IV |
4 |
1–2 (2) |
3 + 1–2 |
ll(s)–sl |
V |
2–3 (3) |
1–3 |
2 + 0 |
ll–ll |
VI |
4 |
3 |
1–2 + 0 |
l(l)–(l)l |
VII |
3–4 |
2–3 (3) |
- |
- |
VIII |
2–3 (2) |
3 |
- |
- |
IX + X |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
Descriptions.
Both sexes.
Head as in
Fig. 3
C, broadly triangular as long as wide, with both frons and occiput slightly concave, preantennal region with slightly concave lateral margin approximately as long as the postantennal margin. Marginal carina interrupted at feeding canal as well as in lateral part, which is divided into pre- and postmarginal carinae. Hyaline margin with slight indentation and without sclerotization. Dorsal anterior plate as in
Fig. 3
B, with arcuate dorsal sclerotization in anterior part, concave anterior margin and slightly concave or straight ventral margin and anterior part of lateral margin (
Figs 3
A–C, E). Ventral anterior plate as in
Figs 3
A, C, E, quadrangular, with slightly concave anterior, concave lateral and slightly convex posterior margin. Postnodal setae and sensilla
s3–s4
median and posterior. Prothorax as in
Figs 3
A, E shorter than wide, with 1 short medial
ppss
on each side and convex lateral sides. Prosternum without setae. Mesosternum quadrangular, without setae, with straight anterior margin, and lateral concave posterior margin. Metasternum not visible, with 2 setae on each side. Pterothorax wider than long, lateral margins convex, posterior margin distally pointed, reaching behind the level of spiracles on segment II. Tergopleurites II–VIII, divided medianly, sternites II–VI entire and well developed, transverse and continuous in both sexes (
Figs 3
A, E). Pleural incrassations relatively broad, with pleural head enlarged medianly, typically reaching to the level of the spiracle in the preceding segment.
Male.
Habitus as in
Fig. 3
A, head as in
Fig. 3
C. One long and 3 short setae (
mms
) on each side of pterothorax, metapleurite with 1 long and 1 minute seta on each side. Thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy as in
Fig. 3
A and
Table 1
. Tergopleurites: II–IX+X divided medially; all with long most lateral seta; two pairs of long most medial setae on tergite III, and long most medial pair on tergite IV–V; other tergopleural setae short, not reaching the anterior margin of the following segment. Sternal setae short with lateral setae longer than median setae. Subgenital plate consisting of sternites VII–IX+X, fused only in a narrow central part, with deep lateral indentations on both sides of the plate. Posterior margin of subgenital plate not clear; one long seta behind the postero-lateral margin. Genitalia as in
Fig. 3
D. Basal apodeme long and quadrangular, lateral margins concave. Parameres very small and only visible as slight protuberances, mesosome long and slender with thicker postero-median end, pointed and bent upwards. One sensillum on each side of posterior margin. Leg chaetotaxy as in
Fig. 5
A, without dorsal setae on all coxae. Measurements as in
Table 5
.
Female.
Habitus as in
Fig. 3
E. Pterothorax with 3–4 medium-long setae (
mms
) on each side. Metapleurite with 1 short seta on each side. Thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy as in
Fig. 3
E and
Table 2
; tergopleural setae long or medium-sized with the lateral pair longest. Sternal setae short with lateral setae relatively longer than median setae on each side. Subgenital plate (
Fig. 3
F) formed by fused sternites VII–VIII, with scale-like pattern on its posterior half, 2 long lateral setae and no median setae (except for one specimen with 1 short setae). Vestigial sternite VIII, sub-vulval sclerites, vulval margin, and associated chaetotaxy as in
Fig.
3
F. Without inner genital sclerites, but with one short and wide transverse sclerite present anterior of vulval opening with 8 microsetae and 6 short, slender scattered setae. Leg chaetotaxy as in
Fig. 5
B. Measurements as in
Table 1
(the genital chamber was not visible in any of the specimens examined, so its measurements were not taken for this species).
Etymology.
The species epithet derives from Latin “
sine
” = “without”, and “
ancor
” = “anchor”, with the diminutive ending “-
ellus
”. The name refers to the hardly noticeable parameres, which at first appear as missing, making the male genitalia look like a useless anchor.
Type
material. Ex
Oreocharis arfaki
:
Holotype
♂
(
Fig. 7
A),
Bulldog Road
,
12 miles
S of Edie Creek
, elev.
2405 m
,
Morobe
District,
Papua New Guinea
,
30 Jun. 1966
,
O.R. Wilkes
, BBM-NG-5222b
.
Paratypes
:
1♂
,
1♀
(
Fig. 7
B), same data as holotype
;
1♀
,
Mount Kaindi
, elev.
2300 m
,
Morobe
District,
Papua New Guinea
,
17 Jun. 1967
,
A.C. Ziegler
, BBM-NG-29174
;
2♀
, same location as previous sample,
6 Jul. 1967
,
A.C. Ziegler
, BBM-NG- 53461.
TABLE 2.
Abdominal chaetotaxy for female
Philopteroides sinancorellus
n. sp.
(explanatory notes as in Table 1)
Segment |
Tergocentral |
Paratergal |
Sternal number |
Sternal code |
II |
1 + 3–4 (1 + 4) |
0 |
4–6 + 2 (4 + 2) |
(l)lls–sll(l) |
III |
4–5 (4) |
0 |
3–5 + 2–3 (4 + 2) |
(l)lls–ss/ll |
IV |
3–4 (4) |
1–2 (2) |
4–6 + 2 (4 + 2) |
(l)lls–sll(l) |
V |
4–5 (4) |
2 |
2–5 + 1–2 (? + 1) |
(l)ls–s/ll(l) |
VI |
4 |
4 |
4–6 + 0 (4 + 0) |
(l)ll–ll(l) |
VII |
4 |
3–4 (3) |
- |
- |
VIII |
1–3 (2) |
2–3 (3) |
- |
- |
IX + X |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
FIGURE 1
.
Philopteroides gigas
n. sp.
ex
Paramythia montium montium
: Points
of measurements and nomenclature of sclerites and setae.
A
, male genitalia;
B
, male dorsal preantennal plate;
C
, female subgenital plate and ventral terminalia;
D
, male head. Scales = 0.1 mm.
Abbreviations. Sclerites:
sgp
= subgenital plate;
svs
= subvulvar sclerite;
vs VIII
= vestigial sternite VIII.
Setae:
ads
= anterior dorsal seta;
as
= anterior seta;
avs
= anterior ventral seta;
dsms
= dorsal submarginal seta;
mds
= mandibular seta;
mts
= marginal temporal seta;
os
= ocular seta;
pas
= preantennal seta;
pcs
= preconal seta;
pns
= postnodal seta;
pts
= postemporal seta;
vsms
= ventral submarginal seta.
Measurements:
ADPL
= anterior dorsal plate length;
APLL
= anterior dorsal plate lateral length;
ADPW
= anterior dorsal plate width;
ANW
= anterior notch width;
GL
= male genitalia length;
GW
= male genitalia width;
HL
= head length;
PA L
= preantennal length;
PAW
= preantennal width;
PMCL
= premarginal carina length;
POL
= postantennal length;
TRL
= trabecula length;
TRW
= trabecula width;
TW
= temporal width;
SGPW
= subgenital plate width.
FIGURE 2
.
Philopteroides gigas
n. sp.
ex
Paramythia montium montium
: Female habitus showing points of measurements. Scale 0.1 mm.
Abbreviations:
AL
= length of abdomen;
AW
= maximal width of abdomen;
HL
= head length;
PTL
= pterothorax length;
PTW
= pterothorax width;
PW
= prothorax width;
TL
= total length;
TPVL
= tergal plate V length.
Remarks.
The male genitalia of the
holotype
and the
paratype
male differ in their appearance. The parameres of the
holotype
are not visible, but they are probably bent against the basal apodeme due to the slide-mounting process. However, in the
paratype
they can be seen as slight protuberances on the postero-lateral corners of the genitalia. A better assessment of the male genitalia will only be possible when more specimens become available.