Three species of Acanthaxius Sakai & de Saint Laurent, 1989, including two new to science, from the Solomon Islands and New Caledonia (Crustacea, Thalassinidea, Axiidae)
Author
Ngoc-Ho, Nguyen
text
Zootaxa
2006
1240
57
68
journal article
10.5281/zenodo.172858
46fb19e6-b349-43f0-8a1d-320ac68eea5e
11755326
172858
Genus
Acanthaxius
Sakai
& de
Saint Laurent, 1989
Remarks
The genus
Acanthaxius
was created by Sakai & de
Saint Laurent (1989)
for eight species with
Axiopsis
(
Axiopsis
)
pilocheira
Sakai, 1987
as
type
species. Later,
Sakai (1994)
increased, with
A. polycheates
, the number of species to nine.
Kensley (1996)
considered that “
the definition of this genus contains some uncertainties
”, redefined it and limited the number of species to five:
A. miyazakiensis
(Yokoya, 1933)
from
Japan
,
A. amakusana
(Miyake & Sakai, 1967)
and
A. polyacantha
(Miyake & Sakai, 1967)
from the East
China
Sea,
A. pilocheira
(
Sakai, 1987
)
from
Japan
,
A. polychaetes
Sakai, 1994
from the Great Barrier Reef,
Australia
, and added
A. kirmilleri
Kensley, 1996
from off
Anguilla
. Two other species were established in 1998:
A. formosa
Kensley & Chan
and
A. grandis
Kensley & Chan
, both from
Taiwan
.
NgocHo (2005)
, describing a specimen of
Axius spinosissimus
Rathbun, 1906
from
French Polynesia
, agreed with
Kensley (1996)
that although this species was placed in
Acanthaxius
by Sakai & de
Saint Laurent (1989)
, it did not fit the generic definition and should logically be assigned to a new genus. Nevertheless, as it comprised only three specimens including the
holotype
, all damaged, it seemed undesirable to establish a monotypic taxon on a material in such poor condition. The species was provisionally retained in
Acanthaxius
(
NgocHo, 2005
).
According to
Kensley (1996)
, the advanced characters of the genus are the relatively slender and dentate rostrum, with its basal pair of spines in a supraorbital position; the form of the pereopod 1 chela, and especially that of the small pereopod 1, with slender dentate fingers being 1.5–2.0 times longer than the propodal palm; the presence of spines on the upper margins of the dactylus and propodus of the pereopod 1 chela; the absence of pleurobranchs; and the presence of epipods on pereopods 1–4.
The new species studied agree well with this scheme except for the fingers of the pereopod
1 in
A. gadaletae
n. sp.
being only about 1.2–1.3 longer than the palm. It can also be noted that all known
Acanthaxius
species have a slender and incurved tip of the antennal article 2, as pointed out by Sakai & de
Saint Laurent (1989)
, which could be considered as diagnostic.