Pomacentrus bangladeshius, a new species of damselfish (Perciformes, Pomacentridae) from Saint Martin’s Island, Bangladesh
Author
Habib, Kazi Ahsan
0000-0003-2644-6193
ahsan.sau@gmail.com
Author
Islam, Md Jayedul
0000-0003-2644-6193
Aquatic Bioresource Research Lab, Department of Fisheries Biology and Genetics, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka- 1207, Bangladesh. & jnujayed 2017 @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 7612 - 6668
ahsan.sau@gmail.com
Author
Nahar, Najmun
0000-0003-2644-6193
Aquatic Bioresource Research Lab, Department of Fisheries Biology and Genetics, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka- 1207, Bangladesh. & naharnajmun 887 @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 9675 - 3060
ahsan.sau@gmail.com
Author
Neogi, Amit Kumer
0000-0003-2644-6193
Aquatic Bioresource Research Lab, Department of Fisheries Biology and Genetics, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka- 1207, Bangladesh. & neogi 3710 @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0003 - 2488 - 7884
ahsan.sau@gmail.com
text
Zootaxa
2020
2020-10-13
4860
3
413
424
journal article
8240
10.11646/zootaxa.4860.3.6
d80b22a7-06b9-4f3d-925b-892a7788fb26
1175-5326
4414051
C6A96B02-BB5C-4C49-B517-F591E168F28F
Pomacentrus bangladeshius
,
n. sp.
English common name: Bengal demoiselle
Local common name: Pettoli
Figures 2
,
3
Zoobank No.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:
F8892626-8F5E-413A-9613-F031E6934CCA
Holotype
.
F1710SM-11;
77 mm
SL (
Fig. 2
);
Bangladesh
,
Cox’s Bazar
,
Teknaf
,
Saint Martin’s Island
; coordinates:
20°36’47.0” N
92°19’36.0” E
(
Fig. 1
); collected by
K.A. Habib
and
M.J. Islam
;
10 October 2017
; local time 4:00
PM
(
GMT
+6);
GenBank
accession number for COI is
MK
340681
.
Paratypes
.
F1801SM-06;
71 mm
SL (
Fig. 3A
); F1802SM-14;
67 mm
SL (
Fig. 3B
); collected by
K.A. Habib
and
A.K. Neogi
;
18 January 2018
and
16 February 2018
, respectively.
GenBank
accession numbers for COI are
MK
340682
and
MK
340683
, respectively
.
Diagnosis.
Dorsal-fin elements XIV, 13; anal-fin elements II, 14; pectoral-fin rays 19; lateral-line scales 18–19 (18); total gill rakers on first arch 17–19 (19); body depth 1.68–1.88 (1.88) in SL. Lateral line single and interrupted. Body color olive to dark brown in freshly caught condition; premaxilla dark brown; iris of adult mostly yellow with a narrow bronze eye ring around pupil. Pectoral-fin base without black spot. Margin of suborbital and preopercle with distinct serrations. A prominent notch present between preorbital and suborbital. Snout scaly to about level of nostrils or beyond, scales absent on preorbital and suborbital (
Fig. 4
). Axillary scale present above base of pelvic fin. Single scale row on preopercle behind the eye and 3 rows of scales present on preopercle below the eye. Circumpeduncular scales 14. Meristic measurements are given in
Table 1
.
TABLE 1
. Meristic counts of the type specimens of
P. bangladeshius
n. sp.
(n=3).
Holotype F1710SM-11
|
Paratype 1 F1801SM-06
|
Paratype 2 F1802SM-14
|
Total gill rakers on first arch |
19 |
17 |
18 |
Scales of lateral-line series |
18 |
18 |
18 |
Scales in longitudinal series |
27 |
27 |
27 |
Scales of lateral-line transverse series |
19 |
18 |
19 |
Scale rows from lateral line to base of first dorsal spine |
3 |
3 |
3 |
Scale rows from origin of anal fin to lateral line |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Pectoral-pelvic scale rows |
3 |
3 |
3 |
Scale rows from lateral line to base of first dorsal ray |
2 |
2 |
2 |
Dorsal-fin spines |
XIV |
XIV |
XIV |
Dorsal-fin soft rays |
13 |
13 |
13 |
Pectoral-fin rays |
19 |
19 |
19 |
Pelvic-fin spines |
I |
I |
I |
Pelvic-fin soft rays |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Anal-fin spines |
II |
II |
II |
Anal-fin soft rays |
14 |
14 |
14 |
Caudal-fin rays |
17 |
17 |
18 |
Branchiostegal rays |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Description.
Body ovate, depth 1.68–1.88 (1.88) in SL and compressed, width 2.56–3.08 (2.56) in body depth; head length 2.91–3.09 (3.08) in SL; dorsal profile of head evenly rounded from dorsal-fin origin to snout; snout length 4.17–4.60 (4.17) in head length (HL); interorbital width 2.56–3.29 (3.13) in HL; eye diameter 3.13–3.29 (3.13) in HL; caudal-peduncle length 3.57–3.83 (3.57) in HL (
Table 2
).
FIGURE 1.
Map of the Saint Martin’s Island and its location in Bangladesh and the Bay of Bengal (District: Cox’s Bazar; Subdistrict/Upazilla: Teknaf; 20°34’–20° 38’ N and 92°18’–92°21’ E).
Mouth terminal, small, oblique, and superior; forming an angle of about 30° to horizontal axis of head and body; maxilla extending to anterior end of pupil; lower jaw longer than upper jaw, jaw gape 3.13–3.29 (3.13) in HL. Teeth incisiform to conical, uniserial posteriorly, becoming biserial anteriorly. Tongue triangular with rounded tip and placed far back in mouth. Gill rakers cylindrical and long, longest on lower limb near angle and about two-thirds length of longest gill filament. Nostril rounded, level with lower edge of pupil and about midway between anterior edge of eye and upper lip. Opercle ending posteriorly with flat spine, tip obtuse, just projecting from underneath a large scale; preopercle margin usually with distinct serrations; the posterior margin of preopercle expanding dorsally to just behind the eye.
TABLE 2
. Proportional measurements of type specimens of
P. bangladeshius
n. sp.
as percentages of the standard length (SL) and head length (HL).
Holotype F1710SM-11
|
Paratype 1 F1801SM-06
|
Paratype 2 F1802SM-14
|
Total length |
98 |
92 |
89 |
Standard length |
77 |
71 |
67 |
Percent in standard length |
Body width |
20.78 |
18.31 |
19.40 |
Body depth |
53.25 |
54.93 |
59.70 |
Head length |
32.47 |
3.09 |
2.91 |
Caudal peduncle length |
9.09 |
8.45 |
8.96 |
Dorsal-fin base length |
66.23 |
61.97 |
65.67 |
Dorsal-fin length |
22.08 |
18.31 |
25.37 |
Pectoral-fin base length |
9.09 |
8.45 |
8.96 |
Pectoral-fin length |
29.87 |
29.58 |
34.33 |
Pelvic-fin base length |
5.19 |
5.63 |
5.97 |
Pelvic-fin length |
31.17 |
30.99 |
29.85 |
Anal-fin base length |
25.97 |
26.76 |
25.37 |
Anal-fin length |
16.88 |
22.54 |
22.39 |
Caudal-fin base length |
14.29 |
15.49 |
14.93 |
Predorsal length |
42.86 |
42.25 |
46.27 |
Prepectoral length |
35.06 |
35.21 |
50.75 |
Prepelvic length |
40.26 |
30.99 |
40.30 |
Preanal length |
68.83 |
66.20 |
68.66 |
Caudal-fin length |
24.68 |
30.99 |
31.34 |
Caudal-peduncle depth length |
12.99 |
14.08 |
14.93 |
Upper-jaw length |
9.09 |
9.86 |
8.96 |
Jaw gape |
10.39 |
9.86 |
10.45 |
Pelvic-spine length |
16.88 |
14.08 |
17.91 |
1st dorsal-spine length |
9.09 |
8.45 |
7.46 |
7th dorsal-spine length |
16.88 |
15.49 |
16.42 |
Last dorsal-spine length |
18.18 |
18.31 |
19.40 |
Longest dorsal-ray length |
22.08 |
23.94 |
25.37 |
1st anal-spine length |
10.39 |
9.86 |
10.45 |
2nd anal-spine length |
19.48 |
18.31 |
19.40 |
Longest anal-ray length |
20.78 |
22.54 |
22.39 |
Upper lobe of caudal-fin length |
24.68 |
26.76 |
26.87 |
Lower lobe of caudal-fin length |
23.38 |
25.35 |
25.37 |
Percent in head length |
Interorbital width |
32.00 |
39.13 |
30.43 |
Preorbital length |
28.00 |
43.48 |
39.13 |
Postorbital length |
44.00 |
43.48 |
43.48 |
Eye diameter |
32.00 |
30.43 |
30.43 |
Snout length |
7.79 |
7.04 |
7.46 |
FIGURE 2.
Holotype of
Pomacentrus bangladeshius
n. sp.
, F1710SM–11, 77 mm SL; freshly caught specimen; Saint Martin’s Island, Bangladesh (K.A. Habib).
FIGURE 3. A.
Paratype 1 (preserved) of
P. bangladeshius
n. sp.
, F1801SM–06, 71 mm SL;
B.
Paratype 2 (preserved) of
P. bangladeshius
n. sp.
F1802SM–14, 67 mm SL, Saint Martin’s Island, Bangladesh (K.A. Habib).
Scales ctenoid; snout scaly to about level of nostrils or beyond; head scaled except lips and tip of snout; subopercle scaly; preorbital (lacrimal) and suborbital naked; single scale row on preopercle behind the eye and 3 rows of scales present on preopercle below the eye; circumpeduncular scales 14 (
Table 1
). Lateral line extending to base of 1st or 2nd dorsal-fin soft ray. Dorsal-fin and anal-fin base with scaly sheath, averaging about 80% pupil width at base of dorsal fin and approximately equal to pupil width at base of anterior part of anal fin, tapering in width on anteriormost and posteriormost portions; scale columns on each membrane of dorsal and anal fins, tapering distally, those on spinous part of dorsal fin gradually longer, extending at least three-fourths distance to spine tips on posterior membranes, and covering as much as 65% of soft dorsal fin and about 70% of anal fin; small scales on caudal fin extending about 65–75% distance to posterior margin; small scales covering about 30–35% of pectoral-fin base. Axillary scale present above base of pelvic fin.
Dorsal-fin origin over third tubed lateral-line scale; predorsal length 2.16–2.39 (2.33) in SL; dorsal-fin spines gradually increasing in length to last spine; first dorsal-fin spine 3.53–4.60 (3.53) in HL; seventh dorsal-fin spine 1.92–2.09 (1.92) in HL; last dorsal-fin spine 1.77–1.79 (1.79) in HL; longest dorsal-fin soft ray 1.44–1.56 (1.56) in HL; first anal-fin spine 3.13–3.29 (3.13) in HL; second anal-fin spine 1.67–1.77 (1.67) in HL; longest anal-fin soft ray 1.44–1.56 (1.56) in HL; caudal fin moderately forked with rounded to moderately angular lobes, its length 1.05–1.32 (1.32) in SL; pelvic-fin spine 1.92–2.3 (1.92) in HL (
Table 2
).
FIGURE 4.
Pomacentrus bangladeshius
n. sp
.
, paratype, F1802SM–14, distinct serrations on suborbital and preopercle; preorbital and suborbital naked.
Color of freshly caught specimen.
Body color olive to dark brown in freshly caught condition; premaxilla dark brown. Iris of adult mostly yellow with a narrow bronze eye ring around pupil. Dorsal spines and spinous membrane olive brown; dorsal-ray membrane dark brown. Membrane of pectoral, pelvic, anal, and caudal fins dark brown (
Figs. 2–4
)
Coloration in preserved condition.
Body color olive brown to nearly black in long-term preserved condition; premaxilla black. Iris of adult mostly yellow with a narrow bronze ring around pupil. Margin of dorsal, pectoral, pelvic and anal fin chocolate brown. Dorsal spines and spinous membrane olive to dark brown; dorsal-ray membrane chocolate brown to nearly black. Membrane of pectoral, pelvic, anal, and caudal fins chocolate to dark brown (
Figs. 2–4
)
Distribution and habitat.
Pomacentrus bangladeshius
is currently known only from Saint Martin’s Island,
Bangladesh
. This island has a coral community that extends from near shore to about
200 m
offshore. Large areas of sand ridges, rocky reefs with some mangrove formations,
Pandanus
vegetation, and scattered boulders/dead corals are the major characteristics of this island.
Etymology.
The new species is named
bangladeshius
(Latin: belonging to
Bangladesh
) in reference to its only known occurrence in
Bangladesh
. The common name ‘Bengal demoiselle’ is proposed for this species based on its existence in the Bay of Bengal.
Remarks.
Most
Pomacentrus
species possess XIII dorsal-fin spines, but 20 species have XIV dorsal-fin spines, of which 13 species occur in the Indian Ocean (
Allen & Wright, 2003
;
Frable & Tea, 2019
;
Froese & Pauly, 2019
). Color patterns are very distinctive for most species of
Pomacentrus
,
and color is generally considered a reliable means for separating them (
Allen & Wright, 2003
).
Pomacentrus bangladeshius
occurs in the northern Bay of Bengal of the Indian Ocean and displays XIV dorsal-fin spines. The measurements and coloration of
P. bangladeshius
are different from all of the other
Pomacentrus
species found in the Indian Ocean.
Pomacentrus bangladeshius
is readily separated from
P. aquilus
Allen & Randall,
1980
in having deeper body (1.68–1.88 vs. 1.9–2.0 in SL), fewer gill rakers on first arch (17–19 vs. 19–22), more lateral-line scales (18–19 vs. 16–18), pectoral fin without spot vs. a black spot at upper base of pectoral fin, and, moreover,
P. aquilus
is restricted to the western Indian Ocean (
Allen & Randall, 1980
). Further,
P. bangladeshius
is different from
P. arabicus
Allen,
1991
in having fewer dorsal-fin soft rays (13 vs. 14–15), more pectoral-fin rays (19 vs. 17–18), fewer lateral-line scales (18–19 vs. 19–22), larger head (2.91–3.0 vs. 3.1–3.5; 3.3) in SL, smaller snout (4.17–4.60 vs. 2.9–3.4; 3.4) in HL, and occurrence of
P. arabicus
is restricted to the Gulf of
Oman
(
Allen, 1991
); from
P. atriaxillaris
Allen,
2002
in having fewer dorsal-fin soft rays (13 vs. 14), fewer gill rakers on first arch (17–19 vs. 21–24), pectoral fin without spot vs. black spot at upper base of pectoral fin and axil; from
P. baenschi
Allen,
1991
in having fewer dorsal-fin soft rays (13 vs. 14–15) and fewer gill rakers on first arch (17–19 vs. 19–21); from
P. indicus
Allen,
1991
in having more pectoral-fin rays (19 vs. 17–18), fewer gill rakers on first arch (17–19 vs. 20–23), and pectoral fin without spot vs. black spot at base of pectoral fin and axil; from
P. milleri
Taylor,
1964
in having more pectoral-fin rays (19 vs. 17–18) and fewer gill rakers on first arch (17–19 vs. 19–20); from
P. pikei
Bliss,
1883
in having fewer gill rakers (17–19 vs. 19–23), more lateral-line scales (18–19 vs. 16–18), and pectoral fin without spot vs. small black spot at upper base of pectoral fin; from
P. polyspinus
Allen
1991
in having more pectoral-fin rays (19 vs. 16–19), dorsal fin without ocellus vs. a black ocellus with pale margin on posterior soft dorsal fin, and dark brown pectoral fin vs. yellowish pectoral fin; from
P. proteus
Allen,
1991
in having fewer gill rakers on first arch (17–19 vs. 19–20) and dorsal fin without ocellus vs. a black ocellus with pale margin on posterior soft dorsal fin; from
P. rodriguesensis
Allen & Wright
2003
in having fewer anal-fin rays (14 vs. 15–16), fewer gill rakers on first arch (17–19 vs. 19–21), and pectoral fin without spot vs. dark brown spot at base of pectoral fin; from
P. sulfureus
Klunzinger,
1871
in having more lateral-line scales (18–19 vs. 14–17), fewer gill rakers on first arch (17–19 vs. 18–23), and pectoral fin without spot vs. black spot at pectoral fin base; from
P. trichrourus
Günther,
1867
in having fewer dorsal-fin soft rays (13 vs. 14–16), fewer anal-fin rays (14 vs. 15–16), more pectoral-fin rays (19 vs. 16–17), fewer gill rakers on first arch (17–19 vs. 19–24), and dark brown caudal fin vs. white caudal fin; from
P. vatosoa
Frable & Tea,
2019
in having fewer lateral-line scales (18–19 vs. 19–20), fewer gill rakers on first arch (17–19 vs. 22–24), pectoral fin without spot vs. small black spot at upper base of pectoral fin, and body without spots vs. two prominent black spots on body—one situated midlaterally behind the pectoral fin and the other on the dorsal edge of the caudal peduncle.
Pomacentrus bangladeshius
is also different from other species of similar appearance with XIV dorsal-fin spines distributed outside of the Indian Ocean.
Pomacentrus bangladeshius
can be separated from
P. australis
Allen & Robertson,
1974
in having fewer gill rakers on first arch (17–19 vs. 19–21) and deeper body (1.68–1.88 vs.
2.2–2.6 in
SL); from
P. bellipictus
Allen, Erdmann & Hidayat,
2018
in having no prominent facial markings vs. blue facial markings and yellow iris vs. dark grey iris; from
P. fakfakensis
Allen & Erdmann,
2009
in having more pectoral-fin rays (19 vs. 17) and opercle without spot vs. small black spot on upper edge of opercle; from
P. opisthostigma
Fowler,
1918
in having more tubed lateral-line scales (18–19 vs. 15–17), fewer gill rakers (17–19 vs. 26–29), and more pectoral-fin rays (19 vs. 18).
Genetic description.
The COI sequences obtained from three specimens (one
holotype
and two
paratypes
) of
P. bangladeshius
displayed a single haplotype, i.e., there is no nucleotide variation among sequences. Phylogenetic analysis resulted in a well-resolved tree of relationships at the species level. In the ML tree, sequences of three specimens of
P. bangladeshius
formed a separate clade with 95% bootstrap support, distinct from other congeneric species used in the analysis (
Fig. 5
). Moreover, the clade formed by
P. taeniometopon
and
P. tripunctatus
was found as the sister group of
P. bangladeshius
(
Fig. 5
). Genetic divergences between
P. bangladeshius
and each of these two species of
P. tripunctatus
and
P. taeniometopon
were found as 7.7% and 14.4%, respectively. Further, genetic divergence of
P. bangladeshius
varied between 7.7% and 17.5% from the other congeneric species used in the phylogenetic analysis.