Range extension and expanded description of Micryletta hekouensis Liu, Hou, Mo & Rao, 2021 (Amphibia, Anura, Microhylidae), with comments on Micryletta of Northern Vietnam
Author
Nguyen, Tan Van
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5413-968X
Institute for Research and Training in Medicine, Biology and Pharmacy, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, 550000, Vietnam
Author
Liu, Shuo
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7825-3006
College of Medicine and Pharmacy, Duy Tan University, 120 Hoang Minh Thao, Lien Chieu, Da Nang, 550000, Vietnam
Author
Tran, Vy The
Kunming Natural History Museum of Zoology, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 32 Jiaochang Donglu, Kunming, Yunnan 650223, China
Author
Tran, Thinh Gia
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7386-6503
Institute of Tropical Biology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 85 Tran Quoc Toan St., District 3, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Author
Trofimets, Alexei V.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, 227 Nguyen Van Cu Street, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Author
Dau, Vinh Quang
Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskiye Gory, GSP- 1, Moscow 119991, Russia
dauquangvinhna@hdu.edu.vn
Author
Poyarkov, Nikolay A.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7576-2283
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, 227 Nguyen Van Cu Street, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam & Hong Duc University, 565 Quang Trung Street, Dong Ve Wark, Thanh Hoa, Vietnam
n.poyarkov@gmail.com
text
Herpetozoa
2024
2024-04-23
37
111
121
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/herpetozoa.37.e120524
journal article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/herpetozoa.37.e120524
2682-955X-37-111
6AE8549DC84240C6B4208CA185169682
2A81877A132A5AECB8E152849F9E61C8
Micryletta hekouensis
, Fig. 2
Micryletta cf. inornata
-
Poyarkov et al. (2018
: 1-27, in part);
Miller et al. (2021
: 248, in part).
Micryletta cf. steinegeri
-
Poyarkov et al. (2021a
: 42-43, in part).
Micryletta hekouensis
- Liu, Hou, Mo & Rao (2021: 133).
Micryletta hekouensis
- Sankar et al. (2022: 462).
Holotype.
KIZ 20210510, adult male collected by Shuo Liu on 15 May 2021.
Type locality
: Nanxi Village, Nanxi Town, Hekou County, Honghe Prefecture, Yunnan Province, China (
22°38'17"N
,
103°59'8"E
; elevation 350 m a.s.l.).
Figure 2.
The
Micryletta hekouensis
alive: from Cuc Phuong NP., Ninh Binh, Vietnam.
A, B.
DTU 316, adult male;
C.
DTU 311, adult male;
D, E.
DTU 317, adult female); from Cat Ba NP, Hai Phong, Vietnam;
F, G.
ZMMU NAP-3580, adult female); from Hekou, Yunnan, China;
H.
KIZ 20210510, holotype, adult male;
I.
KIZ 20210511, paratype, subadult female). Photos by: TV. Nguyen (
A-E
), NA. Poyarkov (
F, G
), and L. Shuo (
H-K
).
Suggested name in Vietnamese.
Nhai
bầu
Ha
khẩu.
Specimens examined
(n = 12).
Two adult
males DTU 310, 316 and
four adult
females DTU 309, 311-312, 317 from
Cuc Phuong NP
,
Ninh Binh Province
,
Vietnam
(ca.
20.2594°N
,
105.6928°E
; elevation of
160-215 m
a.s.l) collected by
Tan Van Nguyen
on
3 June 2018
.
Three adult
males ZMMU NAP-2176, ZMMU NAP-3580, ZMMU NAP-5572 and
three adult
females ZMMU NAP-3352, ZMMU NAP-3574, ZMMU NAP-5574 from
Cat Ba NP
,
Hai Phong Province
,
Vietnam
(ca.
20.8123°N
,
106.9988°E
; elevation of
90 m
a.s.l.
) collected by
Nikolay A. Poyarkov
in
October 2013
.
Table 3.
Measurements (in mm) of the specimens of
Micryletta hekouensis
in
Vietnam
.
Specimen number |
Sex |
SVL |
HW |
HL |
SL |
ED |
NSD |
END |
UEW |
IOD |
IND |
FLL |
HAL |
fd3D |
FeL |
TbL |
FoL |
TbW |
td4D |
IMTL |
DTU 310
|
M
|
22.2 |
6.9 |
6.4 |
2.5 |
3.0 |
1.3 |
1.6 |
2.0 |
2.9 |
2.3 |
5.1 |
11.4 |
0.7 |
9.5 |
9.8 |
16.3 |
3.0 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
DTU 316
|
M
|
24.1 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
2.9 |
3.0 |
1.3 |
1.9 |
2.0 |
3.1 |
2.3 |
6.0 |
14.0 |
0.5 |
11.6 |
12.5 |
20.3 |
3.3 |
0.5 |
0.9 |
ZMMU NAP-2176
|
M
|
21.6 |
6.7 |
7.2 |
2.8 |
2.1 |
1.8 |
1.6 |
1.8 |
2.7 |
1.6 |
5.5 |
10.8 |
0.5 |
8.4 |
10.5 |
16.2 |
2.5 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
ZMMU NAP-3580
|
M
|
20.0 |
6.2 |
6.6 |
2.7 |
2.5 |
1.0 |
1.4 |
1.6 |
3.0 |
2.2 |
6.1 |
9.8 |
0.5 |
8.9 |
9.9 |
14.9 |
1.9 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
ZMMU NAP-5572
|
M
|
23.1 |
7.9 |
7.1 |
3.7 |
3.0 |
0.8 |
2.2 |
1.3 |
4.1 |
1.9 |
7.4 |
12.6 |
0.5 |
11.6 |
13.2 |
19.6 |
2.4 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
- |
Min
|
20.0 |
6.2 |
6.4 |
2.5 |
2.1 |
0.8 |
1.4 |
1.3 |
2.7 |
1.6 |
5.1 |
9.8 |
0.5 |
8.4 |
9.8 |
14.9 |
1.9 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
Max
|
22.2 |
6.9 |
6.4 |
2.5 |
3.0 |
1.3 |
1.6 |
2.0 |
2.9 |
2.3 |
5.1 |
11.4 |
0.7 |
9.5 |
9.8 |
16.3 |
3.0 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
Mean
|
22.2 |
7.0 |
6.9 |
2.9 |
2.7 |
1.2 |
1.7 |
1.7 |
3.1 |
2.1 |
6.0 |
11.7 |
0.5 |
10.0 |
11.2 |
17.5 |
2.6 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
SD
|
1.54 |
0.63 |
0.36 |
0.47 |
0.40 |
0.37 |
0.33 |
0.33 |
0.53 |
0.28 |
0.85 |
1.62 |
0.07 |
1.49 |
1.56 |
2.34 |
0.52 |
0.07 |
0.17 |
DTU 309
|
F (gravid)
|
28.9 |
7.9 |
7.7 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
1.3 |
1.9 |
2.2 |
3.6 |
2.5 |
6.5 |
14.6 |
0.7 |
12.5 |
13.0 |
19.8 |
3.1 |
0.5 |
1.6 |
DTU 311
|
F (gravid)
|
27.1 |
7.4 |
7.6 |
2.7 |
3.1 |
1.3 |
1.7 |
1.8 |
3.4 |
2.3 |
5.8 |
13.3 |
0.7 |
11.2 |
11.7 |
19.7 |
3.8 |
0.8 |
1.1 |
DTU 312
|
F (gravid)
|
29.5 |
7.6 |
7.1 |
2.8 |
3.3 |
1.3 |
1.8 |
1.8 |
3.3 |
2.6 |
5.3 |
13.4 |
0.7 |
12.4 |
12.6 |
19.3 |
3.6 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
DTU 317
|
F (gravid)
|
28.7 |
9.4 |
8.8 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
2.1 |
2.3 |
3.0 |
2.5 |
6.9 |
15.0 |
0.6 |
13.6 |
13.3 |
21.7 |
3.6 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
ZMMU NAP-3352
|
F
|
25.4 |
8.9 |
8.0 |
3.5 |
2.9 |
1.5 |
2.3 |
1.7 |
3.5 |
2.6 |
6.5 |
14.0 |
0.4 |
11.5 |
14.0 |
20.6 |
2.7 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
ZMMU NAP-3574
|
F
|
26.0 |
9.6 |
7.9 |
3.6 |
3.1 |
1.4 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
3.9 |
2.4 |
7.4 |
14.0 |
0.4 |
12.9 |
13.0 |
20.5 |
2.9 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
ZMMU NAP-5574
|
F
|
26.8 |
9.5 |
8.5 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
0.9 |
1.7 |
1.6 |
4.1 |
2.4 |
7.5 |
15.7 |
0.6 |
11.6 |
13.1 |
21.5 |
2.8 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
- |
Min
|
25.4 |
7.4 |
7.1 |
2.7 |
2.9 |
0.9 |
1.7 |
1.6 |
3.0 |
2.3 |
5.3 |
13.3 |
0.4 |
11.2 |
11.7 |
19.3 |
2.7 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
Max
|
29.5 |
9.6 |
8.8 |
3.6 |
3.3 |
1.6 |
2.3 |
2.3 |
4.1 |
2.6 |
7.5 |
15.7 |
0.7 |
13.6 |
14.0 |
21.7 |
3.8 |
0.8 |
1.6 |
Mean
|
27.5 |
8.6 |
8.0 |
3.2 |
3.1 |
1.3 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
3.6 |
2.5 |
6.6 |
14.3 |
0.6 |
12.3 |
13.0 |
20.4 |
3.2 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
SD
|
1.55 |
0.96 |
0.58 |
0.34 |
0.13 |
0.22 |
0.23 |
0.26 |
0.38 |
0.11 |
0.80 |
0.88 |
0.14 |
0.86 |
0.68 |
0.92 |
0.46 |
0.14 |
0.37 |
Variation based on examined specimens from Vietnam
(n = 12).
According to the original description of
Liu et al. (2021a)
the species
M. hekouensis
is a small-sized species of
Micryletta
with SVL 20.5 mm in adult male (Holotype, KIZ 20210510) and SVL 20.8 mm in adult female (Paratype, KIZ 20210511). However, the specimens from Vietnam exhibit generally larger body sizes: SVL 20.0-24.1 mm in males (n = 5), 25.4-29.5 mm in females (n = 7). Therefore, we propose that the paratype specimen should be considered a subadut female, and that
M. hekouensis
in fact represents a medium-sized species within its genus. Moreover, the TbL/SVL ratio in female specimens from Vietnam (0.43-0.55) was also slightly larger than in the paratype female from China (0.40). Furthermore,
Liu et al. (2021a)
reported this species to have a small rounded and distinct tympanum; however, the specimens from Vietnam had the tympanum hidden. It is not clear if the observed morphological differences between the type series of
M. hekouensis
from China and the series from Vietnam represent the actual intraspecific variation, or might result from the different state of specimen preservation, the reproductive condition of the specimens, or the observer effect. However, though we acknowledge the limitations of mtDNA markers for species delimitation in amphibians (e.g.,
Velo-Anton
et al. 2023
), the overall similarity of the Chinese and Vietnamese specimens of
M. hekouensis
in external morphological traits and coloration strongly suggest that they belong to the same species.
Additionally, the Vietnamese specimens examined were characterized by: habitus relatively slender; head small and triangular, width approximately equal to length (HW/HL 0.93-1.11 in males, 0.97-1.22 in females); snout abruptly rounded in dorsal view and slightly acuminate in profile, projecting beyond margin of lower jaw; eyes relatively small, slightly protuberant, pupil oval, transverse, eye diameter slightly equal to snout length (ED/SL 0.75-1.20 in males, 0.83-1.18 in females). Top of the head flat, canthus rostralis rounded and distinct; loreal region weakly concave; nostril round, closer to tip of snout than to eye; interorbital distance greater than internarial distance (IOD/IN 1.26-2.16 in males, 1.20-1.71 in females) and upper eyelid width (IOD/UEW 1.45-1.91 in males, 1.30-1.89 in females). Tympanum and supratympanic fold indistinct. Choanae rounded; vomerine teeth absent; opening of vocal sac long cleft; tongue oval, with no notch at posterior tip.
Forelimbs
: Forearm length ca. three times shorter than hand length (FLL/HAL 0.43-0.62 in males, 0.40-0.53 in females). Fingers slender with no webbing, rounded in cross-section, no lateral fringes; relative finger lengths: I<II<IV<III; tips of fingers round and not dilated; subarticular tubercles on fingers distinct, rounded and prominent, formula: 1, 1, 2, 2; supernumerary tubercles on palm present and developed; three metacarpal tubercles, inner one rounded and smallest, median one rounded and almost directly in front of oval outer one; two rounded and one elongated prominent supernumerary palmar tubercles on the base of fingers II-IV, respectively; nuptial pad absent.
Hindlimbs
: Tibia slightly longer than thigh (FeL/TbL 0.80-0.97 in males, 0.82-1.02), approximately three times longer than wide (TbL/TbW 3.27-5.50 in males, 3.08-5.19 in females); tibiotarsal articulation of adpressed limb reaching eye; foot longer than tibia (TbL/FoL 0.60-0.67 in males, 0.59-0.68 in females). Relative toe lengths: I<II<V<III<IV; tarsal fold absent; tips of toes round and not dilated, slightly wider than those of fingers; webbing between toes absent; subarticular tubercles on toes oval and prominent, formula: 1, 1, 2, 3, 2; dermal ridges present under 2nd to 4th toes but indistinct; inner metatarsal tubercle rounded, prominent, and small; outer metatarsal tubercle absent.
Dorsal skin scattered with small tubercles on dorsum of body, flanks, and hindlimbs, dorsal skin of forelimbs smooth; subtle longitudinal median ridge present on dorsum; dorsolateral fold absent; lateral sides of head smooth; ventral skin of body and limbs smooth.
Colouration in life.
Coloration varies greatly, dorsum of body purple brown, blueish grey, or dark brown with two indistinct parallel longitudinal grey stripes on back. Dorsum of forelimbs light yellow, dorsum of hindlimbs the same color as dorsum of body, no bands on dorsum of limbs. Upper lip white. Ventral side of head, body, and limbs greyish brown, purple grey or pinkish brown. Chin region brownish black, males usually have a darker one than females, white marbling patterns on chest and belly, some white spots on chin region and ventral side of limbs. Iris bicolored, with upper third bronze and lower two-thirds brownish black.
Revised diagnosis.
Medium-sized within genus
Micryletta
(SVL 20.0-24.1 mm in males, 25.4-29.5 mm in females); areas above canthus rostralis, upper eyelids, areas posterior to eyelids, and dorsum of upper arms golden, other parts of dorsum almost solid black or yellowish grey with brownish black stripes; lateral sides of the head and body black or yellowish grey, a white stripe from lower front of eye along upper lip back to anterior forelimb insertion; ventral side of body and limbs pink brown, chin region in adult males brownish black, small and irregular white marbling patterns on chest and lateral belly; tympanum indistinct; supratympanic fold indistinct; outer metatarsal tubercle absent; webbing between toes absent; tibiotarsal articulation adpressed limb reaching level of eye (data from Liu et al. (2021) and this study).
Comparisons.
We summarize the main characters separating
Micryletta hekouensis
from the other twelve species of the genus
Micryletta
in Suppl. material 1. In Vietnam, previously this species was often recorded under the names
M. steinegeri
or
M. inornata
, therefore we focused on comparing the morphological characteristics of
Micryletta hekouensis
with these two species.
Micryletta hekouensis
differs from
M. steinegeri
by having:venter without dark patterns (vs. with greyish white and brown spots); webbing between toes absent (vs. rudimentary webbing); tibiotarsal articulation adpressed limb reaching level of eye (vs. reaching to tympanum).
Micryletta hekouensis
differs from
M. inornata
sensu stricto by having: lager body size in females (SVL 25.4-29.5 mm vs. 19.5 mm); ventral side of body and limbs pinkish brown or pinkish grey with small and irregular white marbling patterns on chest and lateral belly (vs. reddish grey without mottling, nearly immaculate, or chin, chest, and lateral belly with a few dark marbling patterns).
Distribution.
Micryletta hekouensis
was previously known only from Nanxi Town, Hekou County, Honghe Prefecture, Yunnan Province, China (Liu et al. 2021). We here add further records of this species in Vietnam (Ninh Binh and Hai Phong provinces). The new location in Cat Ba NP is situated ca. 335 airline kilometers southeast of the type locality. Given the geographic proximity and distribution patterns of limestone-associated herpetofauna in Vietnam (see
Poyarkov et al. 2021a
,
2023
),
M. hekouensis
likely occurs in several limestone karst massifs of Northern Vietnam; in particular, records from Quang Ninh, Lang Son and Bac Giang provinces of Northeastern Vietnam, as well as from Hoa Binh, Ha Nam, and Thanh Hoa provinces of Northwestern Vietnam are anticipated.
Natural history notes.
Prior to this study, biological data of
Micryletta hekouensis
were very limited; it was only reported from an altitude of 350 m a.s.l. (Liu et al. 2021). The species appears to be closely associated with karstic habitats (
Poyarkov et al. 2018
; Liu et al. 2021). In Cuc Phuong NP, the frogs were observed from 16:00 to 20:00 h under the dead leaves on the ground. Other species of microhylids recorded syntopically with
Micryletta hekouensis
in Cuc Phuong NP included
Kalophrynus interlineatus
(Blyth, 1855),
Glyphoglossus cf. yunnanensis
(Boulenger, 1919),
Kaloula pulchra
Gray, 1831,
Microhyla berdmorei
(Blyth, 1856),
M. butleri
Boulenger, 1900,
M. cf. heymonsi
Vogt, 1911,
M. mukhlesuri
Hasan, Islam, Kuramoto, Kurabayashi & Sumida, 2014,
M. pulchra
(Hallowell, 1861),
Micryletta nigromaculata
Poyakov, Nguyen, Duong, Gorin & Yang, 2017, and
Vietnamophryne cf. orlovi
Poyarkov, Suwannapoom, Pawangkhanant, Aksornneam, Duong, Korost & Che, 2018. In Cat Ba NP, the frogs were observed from 16:00 to 20:00 h hiding between small pieces of limestone rocks. Other species of microhylids recorded syntopically with
Micryletta hekouensis
in Cat Ba NP included
Kaloula pulchra
,
Microhyla butleri
,
M. fissipes
Boulenger 1884,
M. cf. heymonsi
,
M. pulchra
,
Micryletta nigromaculata
. We also recorded gravid females of
M. hekouensis
in June in Cuc Phuong, but other reproduction biology data, such as advertisement call, tadpole morphology, as well as diet of the species remains unknown. It is remarkable that in both localities of
Micryletta hekouensis
in Vietnam, this species was recorded in syntopy with
M. nigromaculata
, another species of the genus
Micryletta
strongly associated with limestone karst formations of northern Vietnam.