2373
Author
Evenhuis, Neal L.
Author
O’Hara, James E.
Author
Pape, Thomas
Author
Pont, Adrian C.
text
Zootaxa
2010
2010-02-26
2373
1
265
journal article
11755334
395
.
Oxyna
Robineau-Desvoidy
,
1830
:
755
.
ORIGINALLY INCLUDED SPECIES:
Oxyna cinerea
Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830
;
Oxyna flavescens
Robineau- Desvoidy, 1830;
Oxyna femoralis
Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830
;
Oxyna maculata
Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830
.
TYPE
SPECIES
:
Oxyna flavescens
Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830
[preoccupied by
Musca flavescens
Fabricius, 1798
; =
Trypeta flavipennis
Loew, 1844
], by subsequent designation (Hendel, 1914: 96).
CURRENT STATUS: Valid genus [
teste
Norrbom
et al
. (1999: 179)
].
FAMILY:
TEPHRITIDAE
.
REMARKS:
Loew (1844: 368)
proposed the replacement name
Trypeta flavipennis
for
Oxyna flavescens
Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830
because, at that time, both Robineau-Desvoidy’s name and
Musca flavescens
Fabricius, 1798
were being treated in the genus
Trypeta
; they were thus secondary homonyms and the Fabrician name had priority. The ICZN
Code
Article 59.3 states: “A junior secondary homonym replaced before 1961 is permanently invalid unless the substitute name is not in use and the relevant taxa are no longer considered congeneric.” Although the nominal taxa are no longer congeneric, the replacement name
Oxyna flavipennis
(Loew)
is currently in use so it cannot be replaced by the original name
Oxyna flavescens
Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830
. Orthographic note:
Fabricius (1798: 565)
used the spelling “
Musca flauescens
” for this nominal species. However,
Fabricius (1799: 33)
used the spelling “
Musca flavescens
”, which has since been the common spelling for the nominal species. Normally, virtually any intentional change in spelling from the original (apart from changes in gender endings caused by new combinations) is deemed an unjustified emendation. However, the ICZN
Code
Article 33.2.3.1 states that “when an unjustified emendation is in prevailing usage and is attributed to the original author and date, it is deemed to be a justified emendation”.
Fabricius (1799)
emended his
flauescens
to
flavescens
and retained the authorship and date. Because
flavescens
is in prevailing usage, it is deemed a justified emendation.