Revision of the genus Centrophorus (Squaliformes: Centrophoridae): Part 2 - Description of two new species of Centrophorus and clarification of the status of Centrophorus lusitanicus Barbosa du Bocage & de Brito Capello, 1864
Author
White, William T.
Author
Ebert, David A.
Author
Naylor, Gavin J. P.
text
Zootaxa
2017
2017-11-06
4344
1
journal volume
31620
10.11646/zootaxa.4344.1.3
83ddc9a7-a41c-4314-8e53-3b4a6501e390
1175-5326
1042279
AD02A80E-30B6-4330-A1C2-84FB3EDC4CF4
Centrophorus longipinnis
n. sp.
Longfin Gulper Shark
(
Figs 11–15
;
Table 2
)
Centrophorus lusitanicus
—
Teng, 1958
: 25
, fig. 16 (
Yilan
and
Kaohsiung
,
Taiwan
)
;
Teng, 1962
: 155
, fig. 39 (Tashi); Chen, 1963: 92 (
Taiwan
)
;
Yang, 1979
: 205
,
Fig. 2
(
Taiwan
)
;
Chen & Cheng, 1982
: 143
,
Fig. 1
(
Taiwan
)
;
Chen & Yu, 1986: 112 (
Taiwan
)
;
Compagno
et al.
, 2005
: 52
(
Philippines
); Hsu & Joung, 2004: 184 (
Taiwan
)
;
Shen & Wu, 2011: 82, Fig. (
Taiwan
)
.
Centrophorus niaukang
—
Chen & Joung 1993
: pl. 2 (fig. 1) (Taiwan).
Centrophorus
cf.
lusitanicus—
White
et al.
, 2006
: 50
, Fig. (Indonesia);
White & Dharmadi, 2010
: 1364
,
Fig. 6a, b
(Indonesia); Ebert
et al
., 2013: 289 (Taiwan).
Centrophorus
sp. 2—
Naylor
et al.
, 2012
: 59
, Fig. 43 (Taiwan).
Centrophorus
sp. 3—
Naylor
et al.
, 2012
: 59
, Fig. 43 (
Philippines
).
Holotype
.
NMMB-P 15756
(tissue accession GN10189), adult male
720 mm
TL,
Cheng-gong
,
Taiwan
,
30 Jul. 2011
.
Paratypes.
(15 specimens)
CSIRO
H 5788-02 (tissue accession GN11178), female
899 mm
TL, Tanjung Luar fish market, Lombok, Indonesia,
11 Apr. 2001
;
CSIRO
H 8104-01 (tissue accession GN11174), female
855 mm
TL,
CSIRO
H 8104-02 (tissue accession GN11175), adult male
679 mm
TL,
CSIRO
H 8104-04 (tissue accession GN11177), female
872 mm
TL, Tanjung Luar fish market, Lombok, Indonesia,
19 Aug. 2005
;
CSIRO
H 7990-02, female
825 mm
TL, Pelabuhanratu fish market, West Java, Indonesia,
10 Mar. 2009
;
CSIRO
H 8103-01, pregnant female
890 mm
TL, Huon Gulf, off Lae, Papua New Guinea, 6°45.147’ S, 147°2.783’ E,
460 m
depth,
4 May 2017
;
CSIRO
H 8103-02, late-term embryo
346 mm
TL, taken from
CSIRO
H 8103-01;
CSIRO
H 8171-01, adult male
761 mm
TL, Da-xi, Taiwan,
14 Apr. 2012
; FRIP 0 3628 (1 of 2), adult male
719 mm
TL, FRIP 0 3628 (2 of 2), juvenile male
637 mm
TL, Taiwan,
11 Mar. 1958
; NMMB-P
25361, 736 mm
TL, adult male, Da-xi, Taiwan,
20
Mar. 2013
; NMMB-P 14051, juvenile female
408 mm
TL, Cheng-gong, Taiwan,
2 Oct. 2011
; NMMB-P 15813, female
905 mm
TL, Cheng-gong, Taiwan,
2 Oct. 2011
; NMMB-P 15814 (tissue accession GN10190), adult male
745 mm
TL, Cheng-gong, Taiwan,
18 Jul. 2011
; NMMB-P 15859, adult male
761 mm
TL, Cheng-gong, Taiwan,
29 Mar. 2011
; BMNH 2017.8.29.1 (to be donated to BMNH), adult male
776 mm
TL, Da-xi, Taiwan,
14 Apr. 2012
.
Other specimens.
(
1 specimen
)
CSIRO
H 8104-03 (tissue accession GN11176), adult male
764 mm
TL,
Tanjung Luar
fish market,
Lombok
,
Indonesia
,
19 Aug. 2005
.
Genetic material (specimens not retained).
(3 samples) Tissue accession GN973, Da-xi,
Taiwan
; Tissue accession GN974, Da-xi,
Taiwan
; Tissue accession GN1007, Da-xi,
Taiwan
.
Diagnosis.
A medium sized (<
1 m
maximum total length) species of
Centrophorus
with the following combination of characters: body relatively slender; head moderately long (20.5–25.1% TL); snout relatively short (horizontal preorbital length 6.4–8.4% TL) and rounded in dorsal view; first dorsal extremely long based (base length 20.8–23.3% TL, soft fin length 16.9–20.2% TL) and relatively high (height 5.7–7.2% TL), inner margin relatively short (5.3–6.8% TL,
2.6–3.2 in
soft fin length); second dorsal fin much smaller in area to first, similar in height to first dorsal fin (height 1.0–
1.3 in
first dorsal-fin height); pectoral fins large (anterior margin length 11.0– 13.0% TL), free rear tip elongate in larger individuals (2.2–4.0% TL); lateral trunk denticles of larger individuals sessile (not raised on pedicels), block-like, not elevated; upper teeth of larger individuals with erect to slightly oblique cusps; lower teeth of all sized specimens much larger than upper teeth, strongly oblique, blade-like; total vertebral centra 112–122; teeth 38–43/29–31.
Description.
Body fusiform, relatively slender, nape only slightly humped; deepest near first dorsal-fin spine, trunk height 1.30 (
0.91–1.34 in
paratypes
>
700 mm
TL) times width, 0.96 (
0.82–1.05 in
paratypes
>
700 mm
TL) times abdomen height; no lateral ridges; interdorsal ridge absent; pre-first dorsal length 4.23 (
4.12 in
408 mm
TL
paratype
;
3.62–4.26 in
paratypes
>
700 mm
TL) in TL; interdorsal space 1.28 (1.61; 1.03–1.38) in prepectoral length, 1.45 (1.69; 1.28–1.62) in pre-first dorsal length; pelvic–caudal space 3.28 (2.60; 2.70–3.50) in pectoral– pelvic space, 1.82 (1.87; 1.62–2.00) in prepectoral length; dorsal–caudal space 2.05 (1.81; 2.09–2.65) in interdorsal space. Caudal peduncle moderately short and deep, moderately compressed, its length 11.5 (12.4; 10.7–12.8)% TL, its height 1.47 (2.11; 1.61–2.15) times its width; tapering slightly towards caudal fin; ventral midline with a groove; dorsal midline with a weak ridge anteriorly becoming a weak groove posteriorly; no lateral keels; precaudal pits absent.
FIGURE 11.
Lateral view of
Centrophorus longipinnis
n.sp.
: (A) adult male holotype (NMMB-P 15756, 720 mm TL); (B) female paratype (
CSIRO
H 8104-01, 855 mm TL); (C) female paratype (
CSIRO
H 7990-02, 825 mm TL); (D) late-term embryo paratype (
CSIRO
H 8103-02, 346 mm TL).
FIGURE 12.
Ventral view of head and pectoral fins of
Centrophorus longipinnis
n.sp.
: female paratype (
CSIRO
H 7990-02, 825 mm TL).
FIGURE 13.
Upper and lower teeth of female paratype of
Centrophorus longipinnis
n.sp.
(
CSIRO
H 7990-02, 825 mm TL).
Head moderately long, moderately broad, width 1.72 (1.44; 1.04–1.73) times trunk width, 1.75 (1.85; 1.18– 1.81) times abdomen width, length 21.1 (24.3; 20.5–22.4)% TL, 2.96 (2.47; 2.76–3.09) in pre-vent length, height 0.67 (0.75; 0.65–0.96) times width; slightly depressed forward of spiracles, somewhat broadly pear-shaped in cross-section at pectoral-fin origin. Band of transverse dermal folds on ventral surface of head broadly rounded with apex about three quarters of horizontal prenasal length behind symphysis of lower jaw, extending from below lower edges of first four gill slits on either side; up to 19 folds present.
Snout moderately long, narrowly triangular in lateral view, apex bluntly pointed; lateral prenarial margin rounded; rounded in dorsal view; horizontal length 1.24 (1.28; 1.07–1.29) times eye length, 0.78 (0.96; 0.68–0.84) times interorbital space; horizontal prenarial length 1.44 (1.43; 1.40–1.57) times in preoral length. Nostrils small, slightly oblique; anterior nasal flap with a large, narrowly triangular lobe, with a very small, sometimes pale lobe at inner corner of large lobe; internarial space 2.80 (2.67; 2.43–2.95) in preoral length, 1.77 (1.85; 1.53–2.05) times nostril length. Eye moderately large, elongate, length 4.04 (3.98; 3.96–4.66) in head, 2.46 (3.30; 1.94–3.81) times height; notched anteriorly; strongly notched posteriorly, notch not extending towards spiracle. Spiracle moderately large, semicircular; located dorsolaterally on head, entirely visible in dorsal view; lower margin about level with upper eye, slightly less than its diameter away from eye; no lobe-like fold on posterior margin; greatest diameter 3.05 (3.19; 2.57–3.83) in eye length. Gill slits directed anteroventrally from top to bottom, fifth angled more than first; first shortest then becoming progressively longer to fifth; fifth longest, its height 2.6 (3.2; 2.4–3.5)% TL.
Mouth almost transverse, upper jaw slightly concave, width 1.22 (1.29; 1.06–1.22) in preoral length; lower labial furrows slightly longer than upper furrows; prominent postoral groove, more than twice length of upper labial furrows, extending posterolaterally from angle of jaws. Teeth strongly differentiated in upper and lower jaws, with upper teeth much smaller than lower teeth. Upper teeth of adults (based on
CSIRO
H 7990-02) moderately large, with erect cusps, becoming slightly oblique posteriorly towards mouth corners, bases slightly overlapping (
Fig. 13a
). Lower teeth much larger than uppers, cusps very strongly oblique, blade-like, overlapping, edges with fine serrations (
Fig. 13b
).
Dermal denticles on flank below first dorsal fin varying greatly in shape between juveniles and adults; absent from insertions of fins and most of the dorsal surface of claspers. Denticles of a juvenile (
408 mm
TL) small, upright, slender, unicuspid, closely spaced (slightly overlapping), and posteriorly curved; about
0.4 mm
long (
Fig. 14a
). Denticles of adults (based on a
855 mm
TL specimen) block-like, sessile (not raised on pedicels), rhomboidal, close set but not overlapping; anterior edges of crowns shallowly scalloped, posterior edge bluntly pointed (
Fig. 14b
).
First dorsal fin extremely long, moderately high; length 4.18 (4.18; 3.37–5.03) times its height, 1.76 (1.77; 1.76–1.98) times second dorsal-fin length; soft-fin length 2.86 (2.55; 2.48–3.47) times its height; height 1.14 (1.13; 0.99–1.25) times second dorsal-fin height; anterior margin slightly convex; apex narrowly rounded; posterior margin moderately concave, slanting well posteroventrally from top to bottom; free rear tip moderately long, relatively thick basally; inner margin nearly straight, 2.88 (2.94; 2.60–3.23) in soft-fin length, 1.00 (0.87; 0.82– 1.20) times its height; insertion level with mid pectoral–pelvic space, extremely well forward of pelvic-fin origin, pelvic-fin midpoint to first dorsal-fin insertion 15.1 (13.1; 13.2–17.6)% TL; base of exposed fin spine level with pectoral-fin free rear tip; spine base moderately broad, exposed anteriorly just above junction of spine and soft portion of fin; exposed fin spine relatively short, robust, tapering distally, anterior margin slightly convex; exposed portion of spine sloping strongly posterodorsally from base (of exposed portion) to apex, shorter in length to exposed portion of second dorsal-fin spine, exposed first dorsal spine length 0.39 (0.30; 0.23–0.39) times height of fin.
Second dorsal fin moderately large, much smaller in area compared to first dorsal fin, relatively short; second dorsal-fin length 2.69 (2.66; 2.25–2.84) times its height; anterior margin slightly convex; apex narrowly rounded; posterior margin weakly concave, sloping strongly posteroventrally from apex; free rear tip relatively short, thick basally, inner margin length 2.09 (2.05; 1.83–2.40) in soft-fin length, 0.78 (0.81; 0.63–0.83) times fin height; spine length 0.42 (
0.32–0.50 in
paratypes
>
700 mm
TL) in height of fin; base of exposed fin spine level with mid pelvicfin inner margin, exposed just above level of junction with spine and soft portion of fin; exposed fin spine relatively long, robust, broad based, tapering distally.
Pectoral fins large; anterior margin weakly convex to nearly straight, its length 12.1 (12.3; 12.0–13.0)% TL; base very short, 2.68 (2.77; 2.26–2.99) in anterior margin length; apex somewhat angular, not falcate; posterior margin nearly straight from apex angle of free rear tip then broadly concave; inner margin slightly concave; free rear tip elongate in adults (less so in juveniles), free rear tip 1.18 (1.04; 1.01–1.14) in inner margin, extending past level of exposed first dorsal-fin spine; origin situated at level of mid-fifth gill slit, partially obscured by gill membrane.
Pelvic fins large, length 11.6 (11.4; 11.0–12.4)% TL, 1.20 (1.14; 1.18–1.44) times second dorsal-fin soft length; anterior margin slightly convex; apex narrowly rounded; posterior margin slightly concave; free rear tip acutely pointed, inner margin very slightly convex. Claspers of adult males relatively short, slender; tapering to a fleshy, narrowly rounded tip (
Fig. 15
); outer length 2.9 (2.5–3.3)% TL, 3.16 (2.98–3.81) times its base length (n = 8); clasper glans about
0.3 in
clasper inner length; apopyle and hypopyle connected by long clasper groove; rhipidion moderately large, laterally expanded, extended from hypopyle to anterior of clasper tip; lateral edge with a slender, straight spine; dermal denticles mostly absent from dorsal surface.
FIGURE 14.
Lateral trunk denticles (from below first dorsal fin) of
Centrophorus longipinnis
n.sp.
: (A) juvenile female paratype, NMMB-P 14051, 408 mm TL; (B) female paratype,
CSIRO
H 8104-01, 855 mm TL.
FIGURE 15.
Clasper (right) of
Centrophorus longipinnis
(paratype
CSIRO
H 8104–02, adult male 679 mm TL). A, Glans not dilated; B, Glans spread. Abbreviations: AP, apopyle; CG, clasper groove; CS, clasper spine; HP, hypopyle; P2, pelvic fin; RH, rhipidion.
Caudal fin relatively long, deep, broad; dorsal margin almost straight to slightly concave, 1.17 (1.18; 1.11– 1.22) in head length, 1.42 (1.70; 1.32–1.51) times preventral margin; preventral margin slightly convex (more so distally), apex narrowly rounded; upper postventral margin slightly convex, lower postventral margin nearly straight to slightly convex, angle between postventral margins moderately concave; terminal lobe moderately large but short, lobe length 2.31 (2.50; 2.05–2.63) in dorsal caudal margin, terminal margin slightly to moderately convex and slightly undulating; apex of upper lobe narrowly rounded.
Meristic data. Total vertebral centra 118 (112–122), monospondylous precaudal centra 59 (56–62), diplospondylous precaudal centra 28 (25–29), total precaudal centra 87 (83–91) and diplospondylous caudal centra 31 (26–34). Tooth count (n = 5): 20 (19–22) + (21) 19–21 / 15 (15) + 14 (15–16); total 41 (38–43)/29 (30–31).
Colour.
When fresh: Dorsal and lateral surfaces brownish, sometimes with a reddish hue (grey in some specimens, particularly smaller specimens); ventral surfaces paler (only slightly paler in
paratype
CSIRO
H 7990- 02); waterline between dorsal and ventral colour shades diffuse and poorly defined on body, more distinct on head and caudal peduncle. Fins without markings in larger specimens; tip of free tip of first dorsal fin often paler; nearterm embryo with blackish dorsal and caudal fins and black anterior margins to paired fins, with narrow white posterior margin to dorsal and paired fins. Similar colour in preservation; fin markings of embryo less distinct.
Size.
Postnatal
type
specimens ranged from
408 to 905 mm
TL; a
637 mm
TL male was immature; males adult between 719 and
776 mm
TL; an
890 mm
TL female was pregnant with a
346 mm
TL late-term embryo (both
paratypes
).
White & Dharmadi (2010)
recorded: females up to
930 mm
TL; an
873 mm
TL pregnant female with a single
45 mm
TL early-term embryo; males adult between 679 and
775 mm
TL, while a
657 mm
TL male was immature.
Compagno
et al.
(2005)
reported on a
737 mm
TL immature male.
Distribution.
Type
material from off
Taiwan
(Cheng-gong and Da-xi fish landing sites—local fishing grounds),
Indonesia
(off southwest
Java
and eastern Lombok), and
Papua
New Guinea
(Huon
Gulf
) (
Fig. 10
).
Compagno
et al.
(2005)
reported this species off
Puerto Princesa City
in the
Philippines
(JPAG 226, tissue accession GN4348); differed slightly in ND2 sequence and specimen not examined in this study. Limited depth information available as most specimens collected from fish landing sites; caught from depths of
330–460 m
in
Papua
New Guinea
(P. Neira, pers. comm.).
Etymology.
Specific name a combination of the Latin
longus
(long) and
pinna
(fin) in allusion to the very distinctive long-based first dorsal fin this species possesses.
TABLE 2.
Proportional dimensions as percentages of total length for the holotype of
Centrophorus longipinnis
(NMMB-P 15756), and ranges for small paratypes (<524 mm TL) and large paratypes (>700 mm TL).
Holotype Paratypes Paratypes
(<
524 mm
TL) (>
644 mm
TL)
......continued on the next page ......continued on the next page
The Maximum Likelihood tree generated from the ND2 sequences obtained provide further support for the separation of
C. lesliei
and
C. longipinnis
as valid species (
Fig. 16
).
Centrophorus lesliei
samples form a distinct group nested within, but separate from, the three long-snout species groups (i.e.
isodon-tesselatus-westraliensis
,
harrissoni
, and
isodon-tesselatus
). The long-snout species group requires further attention and will be dealt with in a subsequent part of this revision series for this genus. It should be noted that none of the sequenced specimens from
Madagascar
are
type
species as whole specimens were not retained, however, they were obtained from the
Mozambique
Channel, close to the locality of the
holotype
and three
paratypes
of
C. lesliei
.
Centrophorus longipinnis
forms a distinct group well separated from the long-snout and
C. lesliei
groups. Within the
C. longipinnis
group, two samples (GN 11175 from
Indonesia
and GN 4348 from the
Philippines
) show some differences to the main group (
Fig. 16
). But morphologically, the Indonesian specimen is identical to the other
C. longipinnis
specimens and is considered to be this species.
Total length (mm) Precaudal length |
720 81.3 |
Min. 346 78.9 |
Max. 408 80.3 |
Min. 719 79.8 |
Max. 905 82.4 |
Pre-second dorsal length Pre-first dorsal length Pre-first dorsal length (horiz.) |
62.5 23.8 23.7 |
61.5 24.0 24.3 |
62.4 26.3 27.0 |
62.1 23.4 23.5 |
65.0 27.2 27.7 |
Pre-vent length Prepelvic length Prepectoral length |
62.6 59.6 20.9 |
60.0 58.3 23.2 |
61.3 59.2 23.4 |
61.1 58.7 19.1 |
64.0 60.9 21.4 |
Head length Head length (horiz.) Prebranchial length |
20.5 21.1 18.5 |
24.7 24.3 21.7 |
24.7 25.1 22.2 |
20.1 20.5 17.3 |
22.1 22.3 19.2 |
Prespiracular length Preorbital length Preorbital length (horiz.) |
12.4 6.5 7.2 |
14.7 7.8 8.3 |
14.8 7.9 8.4 |
11.6 5.8 6.4 |
12.9 6.5 7.3 |
Snout to inner nostril Prenarial length (horiz.) Preoral length |
4.4 4.0 9.4 |
5.2 5.0 11.1 |
5.9 5.2 12.8 |
3.9 3.5 8.6 |
4.7 4.4 9.8 |
Inner nostril–labial furrow space Mouth width Upper labial furrow length |
6.3 7.7 1.9 |
7.4 8.4 1.9 |
7.6 8.6 2.4 |
5.6 7.2 1.5 |
6.1 8.4 2.2 |
Nostril width Internarial space Interorbital space |
1.9 3.4 8.3 |
2.3 4.0 8.1 |
2.4 4.2 9.0 |
1.6 3.1 7.3 |
2.0 3.5 8.6 |
Eye length Eye height Spiracle diameter—greatest |
5.2 2.1 1.7 |
6.1 1.8 1.9 |
6.4 2.4 2.3 |
4.8 1.4 1.3 |
5.4 2.5 2.0 |
First gill-slit height Fifth gill-slit height Interdorsal space |
2.1 2.7 16.4 |
2.6 2.9 14.4 |
2.9 3.2 15.6 |
1.7 2.4 15.0 |
2.4 3.5 18.5 |
Dorsal–caudal space Pectoral–pelvic space Pelvic–caudal space |
8.0 37.7 11.5 |
6.8 32.2 11.8 |
7.9 33.1 12.4 |
6.5 33.7 10.7 |
7.8 37.9 12.8 |
First dorsal length First dorsal soft fin length First dorsal anterior margin |
28.1 19.3 14.5 |
26.2 16.9 15.7 |
28.4 17.3 17.1 |
24.4 17.4 12.1 |
29.4 20.2 16.7 |
TABLE 2.
(Continued)
First dorsal base length |
Holotype 22.3 |
Paratypes (<524 mm TL) Min. 20.8 |
Max. 22.5 |
Paratypes (>644 mm TL) Min. 20.8 |
Max. 23.3 |
F irst dorsal height First dorsal inner margin First dorsal posterior margin |
6.7 6.7 16.5 |
6.8 5.3 14.1 |
6.9 5.9 14.3 |
5.7 5.8 15.5 |
7.2 6.8 17.8 |
First dorsal exposed spine length First dorsal spine base width Second dorsal length |
2.6 0.8 15.9 |
2.1 0.8 15.1 |
2.2 0.8 16.0 |
1.6 0.7 14.5 |
2.6 0.9 16.4 |
Second dorsal soft fin length Second dorsal anterior margin Second dorsal base length |
9.6 10.8 11.4 |
8.2 11.5 11.2 |
10.0 12.0 12.0 |
8.4 9.9 10.2 |
9.9 11.6 12.1 |
Second dorsal height Second dorsal inner margin Second dorsal posterior margin |
5.9 4.6 8.8 |
6.0 4.2 6.7 |
6.5 4.9 7.4 |
5.5 3.8 7.2 |
6.5 4.8 8.8 |
Second dorsal exposed spine length Second dorsal spine base width Pectoral anterior margin |
2.5 0.7 12.1 |
3.0 0.8 11.0 |
3.0 0.8 12.3 |
2.1 0.6 12.0 |
3.0 0.8 13.0 |
Pectoral inner margin Pectoral base length Pectoral height |
12.3 4.5 10.4 |
8.8 4.4 8.2 |
10.5 4.9 10.2 |
10.3 4.1 9.9 |
12.1 5.5 11.2 |
Pectoral free rear tip length Pectoral posterior margin Pelvic length |
3.3 9.0 11.6 |
1.5 7.7 10.6 |
2.1 9.3 11.4 |
2.2 8.2 11.0 |
4.0 10.6 12.4 |
Pelvic height Pelvic inner margin Dorsal caudal margin |
6.0 7.0 18.1 |
4.7 5.3 19.7 |
5.1 6.6 20.6 |
6.0 6.0 17.1 |
7.0 7.6 19.5 |
Preventral caudal margin Upper postventral caudal margin Lower postventral caudal margin |
12.7 7.8 4.2 |
12.1 7.7 3.8 |
13.0 8.4 3.8 |
12.3 6.9 3.7 |
13.7 7.9 5.6 |
Caudal fork width Caudal fork length Caudal terminal lobe |
7.6 12.5 7.8 |
7.3 14.1 7.9 |
7.7 14.3 8.2 |
6.9 12.0 7.0 |
7.9 14.1 9.1 |
Caudal subterminal fin margin Head width at anterior of nostrils Head width at mouth |
2.8 6.0 9.4 |
3.3 6.3 10.6 |
4.1 7.0 11.4 |
2.2 5.5 8.4 |
3.0 6.6 10.0 |
Head width Trunk width Abdomen width |
12.2 7.1 6.9 |
11.7 8.0 6.3 |
11.9 8.1 10.2 |
10.1 6.9 6.6 |
12.7 12.2 10.7 |
Tail width Caudal peduncle width Head height |
4.9 2.8 8.1 |
3.7 1.9 8.7 |
4.5 2.1 9.1 |
4.5 2.1 7.7 |
5.3 2.6 10.9 |
TABLE 2.
(Continued)
Trunk height |
Holotype 9.2 |
Paratypes (<524 mm TL) Min. 11.8 |
Max. 11.8 |
Paratypes (>644 mm TL) Min. 8.1 |
Max. 12.9 |
Abdomen height Tail height Caudal peduncle height |
9.7 7.4 4.1 |
7.7 6.8 4.1 |
13.9 7.7 4.6 |
9.6 6.6 3.8 |
12.9 8.4 4.4 |
Clasper outer length Clasper inner length Clasper base width |
2.9 6.8 0.9 |
– – – |
– – – |
2.5 6.6 0.8 |
3.3 7.2 1.0 |
First dorsal midpoint–pectoral insertion First dorsal midpoint–pelvic origin Pelvic midpoint–first dorsal insertion |
9.6 25.7 15.1 |
10.0 19.1 13.1 |
10.1 20.3 13.7 |
8.6 22.1 13.2 |
13.2 25.1 17.5 |
Pelvic midpoint–second dorsal origin |
0.3 |
1.4 |
2.1 |
-0.6 |
1.8 |
Molecular analyses |
Moura
et al
. (2015)
concluded that the BMNH specimen was
C. uyato
based on DNA sequence comparisons for CO1. This result is inconsistent with the findings we present herein. Morphological data suggest that the BMNH specimen is
C. lesliei
and furthermore, is very distinct from
C. uyato
in possessing a much longer first dorsal-fin base.
Munoz-Chapuli & Ramos (1989)
recorded vastly different first dorsal-fin ray counts between
C. lusitanicus
(=
C. lesliei
) and
C. granulosus
(=
C. uyato
), i.e. 7–9 vs. 16–19, reflecting the large difference in length of the first dorsal fin. Thus, it is not conceivable that these two species could be considered conspecific, or that the BMNH specimen is a long finned variant of
C. uyato
.
Moura
et al.
(2015)
state in their acknowledgements that they obtained a tissue sample from the BMNH specimen and also from ‘the Aquário Vasco da Gama Museum, and
Aldina Inácio
…’ and state at the end of the sentence state, in parentheses, that ‘DNA extraction was unsuccessful’. One possibility is that the BMNH specimen was the one which DNA extraction was not successful on and that a sample from the other source(s) was
C. uyato
. A tissue sample from the BMNH specimen was also collected as part of a broader Chondrichthyan Tree of Life project led by one of us (GN) but despite numerous attempts, no valid DNA sequence could be obtained.