Rhabditid nematodes found from a rocky coast contaminated with treated wastewater of Casey Station in East Antarctica, with a description of a new species of Dolichorhabditis Andrássy, 1983 (Nematoda: Rhabditidae)
Author
Kito, Kenji
Author
Ohyama, Yoshikuni
text
Zootaxa
2008
1850
43
52
journal article
10.5281/zenodo.183386
5f8f79bc-b6de-4474-abaf-c8c0550bbfbd
1175-5326
183386
Dolichorhabditis tereticorpus
sp. n.
(
Fig.2
,
3
)
Type
specimens.
Eight females.
Holotype
ZIHU
3317 and
paratypes
ZIHU
3318-3324, deposited in collections of the Division of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo,
Japan
. Collected by K. Kito on
February 8, 1996
.
Type
locality and habitat.
Rocky coast facing Shannon Bay near Casey Station (
66o17’S
,
110 o32’E
), Bailey Peninsula, Budd Coast of Wilkes Land, East
Antarctica
[Sector 2 of
Andrássy (1998)
]. Sediment contaminated with the treated effluent disposed from the station.
Measurements.
Table 1
.
TABLE 1.
Measurements (in µm) of
Dolichorhabditis tereticorpus
sp. n.
Holotype |
Paratypes (n = 7: ZIHU 3317-3328) |
Characters |
ZIHU 3317 |
Range Avg±sd |
Body length (L) |
911 |
703–1070 821±133.7 |
a |
26.0 |
17.9–29.3 24.0±3.8 |
b |
5.0 |
4.5–6.0 5.2±0.5 |
c |
11.0 |
7.6–12.7 10.2±1.6 |
V (%) |
54.0 |
49.9–54.3 52.9±1.7 |
Lip region diameter |
9.2 |
7.1–9.7 8.3±1.0 |
Stoma length |
19 |
17 –21 18.3±1.4 |
Stoma diameter |
4.8 |
4.1 –4.6 4.4±0.2 |
Pharynx length |
183 |
146 –179 159±11.0 |
Body diameter at pharynx end |
29 |
22 –34 27±5.1 |
Corpus length |
99 |
77 –95 86±5.9 |
Nerve ring from anterior end |
123 |
81 –130 102±15.2 |
Excretory pore from anterior end |
152 |
94 –163 119±23.3 |
Vulva from head end |
492 |
359–571 434±74.9 |
Vulval body diameter |
35 |
25–41 32.4±7.3 |
Maximum body diameter |
35 |
25–46 35.1±8.9 |
Rectum length |
50 |
41–57 48.7±5.6 |
Anal body diameter (abd) |
18 |
11–20 15.6±2.9 |
Tail length |
83 |
70–92 81.3±8.5 |
Characters: a,b,c, de Man's ratios; V, position of vulva as a percentage of the body length from anterior end.
Description.
FEMALE (
Holotype
ZIHU 3317: range and/or avg±sd for
8 specimens
in parentheses). Body (
Fig. 2
-A) almost cylindrical, gradually tapering to anterior end, abruptly tapering from level of anus to tail end. Maximum body diameter near or at level of vulva. Cuticle 0.6-0.9 μm thick, transversely striated, annules 0.8 (0.8–1.1) µm wide at midbody. Lateral field with four longitudinal lines (three ridges), but often inconspicuous (
Fig. 2
F, G); 2.3–5.6 µm wide or about 8–16 % of body diameter at level of vulva in
paratypes
.
Head (
Fig. 2
C) truncate, not offset or weakly offset; six lips slightly protuberant, equipped with 6+4 papilliform sensilla. Amphid aperture small, oval-shaped, located on lateral lips. Stoma nearly cylindrical, 1.9 (1.9– 2.7, 2.2±0.3) lip region diameters or 3.8 (3.7–4.9, 4.1±0.4) stoma diameters in length; cheilostom unsclerotized, promesostom cylindrical, well cuticularized and slightly tapering anteriorly; glottoid apparatus isomorphic, metastom with two tooth-like denticles. Pharyngeal collar extending to middle of stoma, about 0.6 (0.5– 0.6) stoma lengths. Corpus of pharynx (
Fig. 2
B) almost cylindrical without a median bulb or swelling, junction with isthmus marked by expansion of triradiate lumenal rays and transverse slit of muscular wall (
Fig. 3
A), 54 (53–57, 54±1.6) % of pharynx length, maximum diameter 14 (10–15, 13±1.7) µm or 61 (50–65, 57±0.05) % of corresponding body diameter. Terminal bulb with duplex haustrulum, 31 (26–33, 30±2.4) µm long by 21 (18–23, 21±1.8) µm wide. Nerve ring surrounding middle of isthmus, 67 (54–73, 64±5.5) % of pharynx length from anterior end. Excretory pore (
Fig. 2
D) 83 (52–91, 75+11) % of pharynx length from anterior end; duct conspicuously cuticularized. Hemizonid not observed. Deirids conspicuous in lateral field posterior to nerve ring, located at 77 (59–77, 71±7.7) % of pharynx length from anterior end.
Reproductive system (
Fig. 2
E) amphidelphic. Ovaries homodromous, reflexed dorsally at 26 (18–29, 25±3.9) % and 23 (17–27, 22±3.9) % of body length anterior and posterior to vulva, respectively; anterior ovary located on right side of intestine and posterior on left side; dorsal flexures extending to level of oviduct. Two pseudocoelomocytes located before flexure of anterior ovary, one behind flexure of posterior ovary (0–2 pseudocoelomocytes observed in
paratypes
). Oviduct short, cell arrangement inconspicuous; spermatheca located at dorsal side of oviduct and connected to its distal portion (
Fig. 3
B); spermatheca rounded in young female. Uteri containing eight (0–12) eggs in various embryonic stages. Vulva (
Fig. 2
G) transversely slit-like, located near midbody; vulval region slightly protruding ventrally. Vagina weakly cuticularized, 5 (5–10; 8±1.7) μm long or 15 (15–35, 28±7.7) % of vulval body diameter. Rectum (
Fig. 2
H, 3C, D) extremely long and proximally expanded, 2.8 (2.6–4.7, 3.2±0.7) abd; three large rectal glands conspicuous, each followed by a few small cells.
Tail conical, with pointed tip end, 4.6 (4.2–7.9, 5.3±1.1) abd or 1.7 (1.5–2.1, 1.7±0.2) rectum length. Phasmids distinct, about 1.4 (1.0–1.8, 1.3±0.3) abd or 31(22–31, 25±3.6) % of tail length from level of anus.
MALE. Unknown.
Etymology.
The specific name
tereticorpus
refers to the pharyngeal corpus which is almost cylindrical without swelling.
Diagnosis and relationships.
Dolichorhabditis tereticorpus
sp. n.
is characterized in the genus by the following features in the female: body length (703–1070 µm) in the medium range for the genus, long cylindrical stoma (1.8–2.7 lip region diameters or 3.1–4.9 stoma diameters), metastom with two tooth-like denticles, cylindrical corpus without swelling, conspicuously cuticularized excretory duct, extremely long and expanded rectum (2.6–4.7 abd), spermatheca enlarging to dorsal side of oviduct, and conical tail with pointed tip (4.2– 7.9 abd or 1.5–2.1 rectal lengths). This species is probably hermaphroditic.
The present new species is apparently related to two genera,
Dolichorhabditis
Andrássy, 1983
and
Oscheius
Andrássy, 1976
, recently emended by
Andrássy (2005)
, on the basis of female/hermaphrodite having the extremely elongated rectum and conspicuous excretory duct. However, although male is unknown, the present species can be included into
Dolichorhabditis
in having the well developed long stoma (vs. short stoma in
Oscheius
) and metastom with setose denticles (vs. warts) as diagnostic characters of the genus (
Andrássy, 2005
).
Dolichorhabditis
consists of the following ten species (
Andrássy, 2005
),
D. bengalensis
(
Timm, 1956
)
Andrássy, 2005
,
D. carpathica
(
Soós, 1941
)
Andrássy, 1983
,
D. debilicauda
(
Fuchs, 1937
)
Andrássy, 1983
,
D. dolichura
(Schneider, 1866)
Andrássy, 1983
(
type
species),
D. dolichuroides
(
Anderson & Sudhaus, 1985
)
Andrássy, 2005
,
D. guentheri
(
Sudhaus & Hooper, 1994
)
Andrássy, 2005
,
D. pseudodolichura
(Körner in
Osche, 1952
)
Andrássy, 2005
,
D. rara
(
Körner, 1954
)
Andrássy, 1983
,
D. sechellensis
(
Potts, 1910
)
Andrássy, 2005
, and
D. tipulae
(
Lam & Webster, 1971
)
Andrássy, 2005
.
FIGURE 2.
Dolichorhabditis tereticorpus
sp. n.
Female (holotype ZIHU 3317; left side view, except F in right side view): A) Entire body. B) Anterior region. C) Stoma region. D) Posterior region of pharynx. E) Reproductive system. F) Anterior region of anterior ovary. G) Vulval region. Lateral field indistinct, only three longitudinal lines observed. H) Posterior region. Scales: A: 100 µm; B: 20 µm; C, D, F–H: 10 µm; E: 50µm.
Of the ten known species,
D. tereticorpus
sp. n.
clearly differs from
D. carpathica
,
D. debilicauda
, and
D. rara
by the rectum length (2.6–4.7 abd length vs. less than
2 in
the latter 3 species). The other seven species were previously treated as members of “
Dolichura
-group” in
Rhabditis (Oscheius)
Andrássy, 1976
by
Sudhaus & Hooper (1994)
and
Sudhaus & Fitch (2001)
. According to the key to species of the group in
Sudhaus & Hooper (1994)
,
D. tereticorpus
is distinguished from
D. guentheri
,
which has a rudimentary posterior gonad (vs. well developed and functional paired gonads in
D. tereticorpus
);
D. bengalensis
, which has a swollen or clavate tail terminus (
Sudhaus, 1974
) (vs. tail with pointed tip); and
D. dolichura
, with tail length less than 4 abd or 1.5 rectum lengths (e.g.,
Völk, 1950
) (vs. 5.3±1.1 abd or 1.7±0.2 rectum lengths in
D. tereticorpus
). Of the remaining four species,
D. tereticorpus
resembles the gonochoristic
D. dolichuroides
in having a cylindrical corpus without swelling. However, the new species differs from
D. dolichuroides
by the short body length (L=703–1070 µm vs.
1167–1580
µm in
D. dolichuroides
), almost cylindrical midbody (vs. constricted at vulval region), pharyngeal lumen with no peculiar structure (vs. with a fine zipper-like structure), and vulva with smooth lips (vs. with thin, lamelliform lips). Of the three species characterized by having a pharynx with slightly swollen corpus,
D
.
tereticorpus
is somewhat similar to
D. tipulae
in general morphometric features but differs from it in having the dorsal flexures of ovaries not extending beyond oviduct and the spermatheca enlarging to the dorsal side of oviduct (vs. dorsal flexures extending to uterus or beyond vulva and spermatheca following oviduct longitudinally in
D. tipulae
; cf.
Sudhaus, 1993
).
Dolichorhabditis tereticorpus
is also distinguished from
D. pseudodolichura
and
D. sechellensis
by the combination of the following characters: medium body length (703–1070 µm), value of
De
Man’s ratios (b=4.5–6.0, c=7.6–12.7), four lateral lines, metastom with two denticles, shorter excretory duct and tail length (t=69–92): larger b value (6.6–8.0), metastom with five denticles and long excretory duct in
D. pseudodolichura
(
Körner, 1954
)
; smaller c value (5–6) and two lateral lines in
D. sechellensis
.
As
mentioned above, the present new species has been erected in
Dolichorhabditis
here on the basis of the female characteristics, well developed long stoma, metastom with tooth-like denticles (setose teeth) and long rectum as diagnostic characters of the genus (
Andrássy, 2005
). This inclusion, however, may be reexamined if more data are obtained, particularly from male specimens, in future. Two known species,
D. carpathica
and
D. rara
, were also placed into this genus on the basis of female in
Andrássy (1983
,
1984
,
2005
), although they have rather shorter rectum (less than 1 abd length, calculated from the original drawings in
Soós, 1941
and
Körner, 1954
, respectively). It seems appropriate to exclude these two species from
Dolichorhabditis
as treated in “
Dolichura
-group” of
Rhabditis (Oscheius)
in
Sudhaus & Hooper (1994)
.