Studies in the Liocranidae (Araneae): revision of Andromma Simon, 1893 Author Bosselaers, Jan D6AD7414-3540-4F06-8631-8873450AA90C Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium. dochterland@telenet.be Author Jocqué, Rudy CF15016C-8CD1-4C9D-9021-44CA7DC7A5D5 Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium. jocque@africamuseum.be text European Journal of Taxonomy 2022 2022-12-09 850 1 78 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2022.850.1997 journal article 207924 10.5852/ejt.2022.850.1997 49c26e4e-77d4-4c8e-9257-b1b034d8d5f9 2118-9773 7427642 E8AD897F-2076-4850-9520-BB79B1EAFFEA Genus Andromma Simon, 1893 Type species Andromma aethiopicum Simon, 1893 , by monotypy. Diagnosis Andromma resembles Hortipes Bosselaers & Ledoux, 1998 by the peculiar retina of the AMEs which, as seen from above, is only visible in the median half of these eyes. It differs from it by the absence of a metatarsal sensory array on the legs I and II ( Bosselaers & Jocqué 2000 ; Ramirez 2014: 118 ), by the smaller number of ventral spine pairs on the tibia and metatarsus I and II, by the flat carapace, which is not elevated in the thoracic region, and by the absence of a median apophysis on the male bulbus. Andromma also resembles the equally myrmecophilous Arabelia Bosselaers, 2009 in general somatic aspect, but differs from it by the absence of an anterior epigynal hood, by the smaller copulatory opening, by the absence of spermathecae II, by the complex, bipartite RTA of the male palp, and by the longer embolus. It differs from Cybaeodes by the bipartite RTA, and by the absence of enlarged piriform gland spigots on the ALS of males, and from Paratus Simon, 1898 by the flat carapace, by the shorter and less numerous ventral spine pairs on the tibia and metatarsus I and II, and by the absence of dorsal guanine spots on the abdomen. Andromma differs from Liocraninae in general by the absence of rows of large and erectile bristles with special basal sockets in the ventral scopulae of tibia, metatarsus and tarsus of legs I–III ( Ubick & Platnick 1991: 2 ). Description Translation of original Latin description of Simon (1893: 390) Cephalothorax short and oval, rather convex, without fovea. Four eyes in a straight transverse line, the medians of medium size, the laterals small, minute in males. Clypeus about twice as high as diameter of median eyes. Strong chelicerae with a robust and long fang. Labium much wider than long, transversely semicircular and hardly reaching the middle of the endites. Endites broad and short, not much longer than wide, very blunt, inclined, not curved or transversely grooved. Sternum convex, broadly heartshaped, wider than long. Posterior coxae widely spaced. Leg formula 4123. Legs rather short, tarsi long and hardly shorter than metatarsi, the anterior ones slightly fusiform. Tarsi hardly scopulated, but with dense claw tufts. Tarsal claws shiny and slender, with a series of 5–6 teeth reaching to the apex. Anterior lateral spinnerets closely spaced, longer than posterior medians. Posterior lateral spinnerets also longer than medians, their apical segment at least ⅓ shorter than basal one ( Fig. 2F–G ). Additional description data In the remainder of the text, Simon (1893: 387–389) elaborated on the differences between Andromma and Cybaeodes or Cithaeron O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1872 (erroneously spelled Cythaeron in the text). This allows us to infer the following additional characteristics: legs reddish brown, spineless, tarsal claw tufts consisting of tenent hairs ( Forster 1970: 18 ; Ubick & Vetter 2005: 69, 71).Anterior lateral spinnerets rather small and cylindrical, separated at the base by their diameter. Posterior median spinnerets of similar shape, as long as anterior laterals or longer. Posterior lateral spinnerets a bit thicker than anterior laterals and slightly more widely separated, resulting in a trapezoidal spinneret area, which is narrower anteriorly, contrary to the situation in gnaphosids, except the Micaria group ( Murphy 2007 ). Posterior lateral spinnerets consisting of two segments, the apical one conical and at least one third shorter than the basal one. Female palp rather long, tibia much longer than patella, tarsus a bit longer than tibia and slightly fusiform. Male palpal tibia somewhat shorter than patella, with a bifid apophysis: a hook-shaped retrolateral apophysis (RTA) and a thicker ventral apophysis (VTA) with an anterior cavity. Simon also mentions a small tibial prolateral tooth, but we were unable to observe that in any of the species examined. Palpal tarsus longer than patella and tibia together, oval, large, convex, with a tip that largely exceeds the convex, simple bulbus. Abdomen covered in greyish silky hairs. Remarks on original description Simon’s original description understandably is solely based on the only species known to him at the time, A. aethiopicum . Unfortunately, this species is one of the least representative for the genus as a whole. The following four corrections are important to note: 1. While some species of Andromma have a sternum that is as wide as long (e.g., female of A. deogratias sp. nov. , A. bouvieri and A. ghesquierei sp. nov. ), the sternum is longer than wide in most species of Andromma known to date. Andromma aethiopicum , A. anacardium sp. nov. and the female of A. raffrayi are the only species within the genus with a sternum that is clearly wider than long. 2. Most species of Andromma have eight eyes. The only other species with significant eye reduction are A. albinovani sp. nov. and A. deogratias sp. nov. ( Fig. 2A–B ). 3. Most species of Andromma have at least some leg spines. 4. Andromma does have a thoracic fovea, as our habitus photographs show ( Figs 20A , 22A , 30A ). In very pale specimens, it may be difficult to see ( Fig. 5A ). 5. In his French description, Simon (1893: 388) refers to the claw tufts as “denses et formés de poils claviformes nombreux”. However, careful observation shows that these hairs are not clavate. To the above can be added that the AMEs of Andromma are oriented divergently. As a consequence, the retina of the AMEs which, as seen from above, is only visible in the median half of these eyes. ( Fig. 2A–E ). Such AMEs are also present in Hortipes ( Bosselaers & Jocqué 2000 : figs 1–2), Attacobius Mello-Leitão,1925 (Corinnidae) ( Platnick & Baptista 1995 : figs 7–8), Piabuna Chamberlin & Ivie, 1933 (Phrurolithidae) ( Bosselaers & Jocqué 2002 : fig. 2f; Chamberlin & Ivie 1933 : fig. 122), Orthobula Simon, 1897 (Trachelidae) ( Marusik et al . 2013 : figs 1–2) and Paratus (Liocranidae) ( Marusik et al. 2008 : fig. 4), and others ( Bosselaers & Jocqué 2002 : table 1). Furthermore, the male palp has a tibial apophysis split into a ventral (VTA) and retrolateral (RTA) part as well as a globular bulbus without median apophysis ( Figs 4E–F , 6D–E ). The epigyne presents conspicuous copulatory openings in most species ( Figs 5C–D , 9C–D ) and the vulva generally has more or less globular spermathecae ( Figs 25C– F , 30E–F ). The spermathecae have short, tubular fertilisation ducts running in posterior direction. These fertilisation ducts are accompanied by a sickle-shaped sclerite (Sss) oriented laterally or posteriorly ( Fig. 7D ; Ledoux & Canard 1991 : fig. 36). Such sclerites should not be confounded with fertilisation ducts; they are commonly found in dionycha, e.g., in many Gnaphosidae ( Grimm 1985 ) , Apostenus Westring, 1851 (Liocranidae) ( Grimm 1986 ), Arabelia Bosselaers, 2009 (Liocranidae) (Bosselaers 2009), Cheiracanthium Wagner, 1887 (Cheiracanthiidae) (Bosselaers 2013), Cteniogaster Bosselaers & Jocqué, 2013 (Liocranidae) ( Bosselaers & Jocqué 2013 ), Heser Tuneva, 2004 (Gnaphosidae) (Bosselaers 2010), Hortipes Bosselaers & Ledoux, 1998 (Corinnidae) ( Bosselaers & Jocqué 2000 ), Metatrachelas Bosselaers & Bosmans, 2010 (Trachelidae) ( Bosselaers & Bosmans 2010 ), Paratrachelas Kovblyuk & Nadolny, 2009 (Trachelidae) ( Bosselaers et al . 2009 ), Rhaeboctesis Simon, 1897 (Liocranidae) ( Bosselaers & Jocqué 2002 ), and Trachelas L. Koch, 1872 (Trachelidae) ( Bosselaers et al . 2009 ). However, these sclerites are never explicitly mentioned in the literature. Engelhardt (1910: 73 , fig. 25) and Osterloh (1922: 386 , fig. 36) mention sclerotised beams in the vulvae of Platnickina tincta (Walckenaer, 1802) and Allagelena gracilens (C.L. Koch, 1841) respectively, but these structures do not correspond to the sickle-shaped sclerites mentioned here.