Biodiversity hotspot in the Sangha Trinational Protected Area revealed through Orthoptera Tettigoniidae
Author
Massa, Bruno
0000-0003-2127-0715
bruno.massa@unipa.it
text
Zootaxa
2023
2023-08-18
5331
1
1
67
http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5331.1.1
journal article
264218
10.11646/zootaxa.5331.1.1
ebee8044-9130-4ce6-9c05-c0f7c65e7f1e
1175-5326
8260962
85D2BD10-1F94-44DF-98C9-9312A28EE584
Tetraconcha laszloi
n. sp.
Figs. 30a–30c
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:
8103B4DB-03F8-4BD9-8681-87AAC633C00E
Material examined
.
Republic of Congo
,
Sangha prov.
, N-N NP,
Mondika
camp (
352m
)
02°21’50.63”N
,
16°16’25.82”E
,
7–14.II.2023
,
Actinic light trap
,
N.M. Bakala
, V
.
Dérozier, A
.
Kirk-Spriggs, G
. László (♁
holotypus
) (
ANHRT
)
.
FIGURE 30.
Tetraconcha laszloi
n. sp.
a) stridulatory area of the male; b) stridulatory file under the left tegmen; c) dorsal view of cerci and subgenital plate.
Description
. Male.
Colour
. Brown, with yellowish venation, abdomen yellow, cerci brown (
Fig. 30a
).
Head and antennae
. Fastigium of vertex narrow, apically furrowed, separated from fastigium of frons. Eyes rounded, well projecting. Antennae long.
Pronotum
narrowing anteriorly, flat above, anterior margin incurved, posterior margin rounded, humeral sinus well developed, lobes of pronotum rounded.
Legs
. Fore coxae armed with a thin spine. Fore tibiae furrowed dorsally, distinctly widening above tympanum, conchate on both sides. Fore femora armed on inner ventral side with 8 spines, fore tibiae with 7 spines + 1 spur on inner and 5 spines + 1 spur on outer ventral sides, 5 spines + 1 spur on outer dorsal side, mid femora armed with 5 spines on outer ventral side, mid tibiae with 13 spines on outer and inner ventral sides + 1 spur on each side, and 3 spines + 1 spur on inner dorsal side, hind femora armed with 4 small spines on outer and 4 on inner ventral sides, hind tibiae with many spines on ventral and dorsal sides + 3 spurs on each side.
Tegmina
narrow with rounded apices, hind wings longer than tegmina. Stridulatory area of left and right tegmina as shown in
Fig. 30a
; stridulatory file 2.1 long, arched and composed of ca. 50 evenly spaced teeth (
Fig. 30b
). Distance between left tegmen base and max width of lower cubital area 5.0 mm, size of upper and lower cubital areas 1.1 and
1.3 mm
.
Abdomen
. Subgenital plate short with a V-shaped concavity, with two style-like appendices, cerci stout and incurved (
Fig. 30c
).
Female. Unknown.
Measurements
(mm). Male. Body length: 17.8; length of pronotum: 4.8; depth of pronotum: 3.2; length of hind femora: 24.8; length of tegmina: 33.0; depth of tegmina: 5.8.
Etymology
.
Tetraconcha laszloi
n. sp.
is with pleasure dedicated to Gyula László (ANHRT), who participated on some expeditions in tropical Africa, collecting interesting species of
Orthoptera
.
Affinities
.
Tetraconcha laszloi
n. sp.
, the eighteenth species of the genus, should belong to the group of
T. smaragdina
Brunner
con Wattenwyl, 1891, the differences from related species lying in the stridulatory file and stridulatory area. They are highlighted in
Table 2
and
Fig. 31
.
TABLE 2.
Measurements of the length of the stridulatory file, the distance between the left tegmen base and the maximum width of lower cubital area, and the size of the upper and lower cubital areas of all the species of the genus
Tetraconcha
, with the exception of
T. longipes
(Bolívar, 1893)
known only from the female sex.
Species
|
Length of stridulatory file (mm) |
Distance between left tegmen base and max width of lower cubital area (mm) |
Size of upper and lower cubital areas (mm) |
T. fenestrata
Karsch, 1890
|
1.8 |
5.4–5.6 |
1.1–1.2, 0.5–0.6 |
T. ruzzieri
Massa, 2017
|
1.8 |
3.6 |
0.7, 0.2 |
T. danflousi
Massa, 2017
|
1.0 |
- |
- |
T. stichyrata
Karsch, 1890
|
1.7 |
7.0–9.0 |
1.0–1.9, 1.9–2.5 |
T. banzyvilliana
Griffini, 1909
|
1.8 |
4.5–5.0 |
1.0–1.0 |
T. smaragdina
Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1891
|
1.6 |
4.9–6.5 |
0.6–1.0, 0.6–0.9 |
T. perezi
Massa, 2017
|
1.8 |
4.9–5.6 |
0.6–0.7, 0.6–0.7 |
T. loubesi
Massa, 2017
|
2.5 |
3.5–5.2 |
0.6–0.8, 0.6–0.9 |
T. morettoi
Massa, 2017
|
1.5 |
4.2–5.4 |
0.7–0.9, 0.6–0.8 |
T. ndokiensis
Massa, 2017
|
1.4 |
4.0–6.0 |
0.5–0.9, 0.5–0.9 |
T. annoyeri
Massa, 2017
|
1.5 |
4.0–6.0 |
0.5–0.9, 0.6–1.0 |
T. fijalkowskii
Massa, 2017
|
1.3 |
2.9–3.8 |
0.4–0.5, 0.2–0.5 |
T. omonomai
Massa, 2017
|
1.1 |
3.0–4.5 |
0.2–0.6, 0.2–0.5 |
T. aristophanousi
Massa, 2017
|
1.8 |
3.9 |
0.6, 0.6 |
T. fusca
Massa, 2021
|
1.5 |
4.5 |
0.9, 0.8 |
T. maculosa
n. sp.
|
1.8–2.0 |
4.2–4.4 |
0.6, 0.5 |
T. laszloi
n. sp.
|
2.1 |
5.0 |
1.1, 1.3 |
FIGURE 31.
Comparative aspect of the stridulatory file of twelve species of
Tetraconcha
; with the exception of
T. aristophanousi
(which lives in West Africa), the others have been found in central tropical Africa.
Remarks on the genus
Tetraconcha
The genus
Tetraconcha
Karsch, 1890
was revised by
Massa (2017)
, with another species described more recently (
Massa 2021a
). This genus has evolved less in morphological characters, but more in the acoustic signals. Indeed, the best way to identify the species belonging to this genus is to observe the shape and number of teeth of the stridulatory file under the left tegmen. This enabled the discovery that in central-western tropical Africa presently eighteen species live, some of them syntopically. Certainly, it is the different songs produced by the stridulatory apparatus that allows the separation of the species. A possible process of sympatric (more than allopatric) speciation likely occurred among the populations of
Tetraconcha
, originated from ecological specialization or simply sound differentiation.
The Sangha Trinational Protected Area proved to be the region with the greatest diversity of species in this genus, probably due to the variety of vertically distributed microhabitats in the primary forests. It is likely that more unknown species of this genus will be discovered in the future, which have so far gone unnoticed due in part to the difficulty of identifying differential diagnostic characters. To contribute to a better knowledge of the genus,
Table 2
shows some measurements of the stridulatory file and stridulatory area, and
Fig. 31
the stridulatory files of the most related species, mainly belonging to the
smaragdina
group.