S. ramirezi
|
S. oligopus
|
Number of leg-bearing segments |
Male: 27 |
Male: mostly 29 (very rarely 27) |
Female: 29 |
Female: 31 |
Body length |
6 mm (male) |
8 mm (male) |
7 mm (female) |
10 mm (female) |
Clypeus with an anterior middle area with areolation |
No (Fig. 47) |
Yes (Fig. 62) |
smaller than the remaining clypeal surface |
Clypeus bearing 1+1 lateral setae |
Yes (Fig. 13: a, Fig. 47) |
No (Fig. 61) |
Lateral pieces of labrum |
Frequently with
ca.
2+2 teeth with
|
Frequently with
ca.
4+4 teeth with
|
shape as in Figs. 14, 48 |
shape as in Fig. 63 |
Dentate lamella of mandibles |
Apparently undivided (Figs. 49, 50) |
Divided in three blocks (Fig. 64) |
Setae on coxosternite of first maxillae |
With 1+1 setae (Fig. 51) |
Setae absent (Fig. 65) |
Coxosternite of second maxillae bearing a seta on the |
Yes (Fig. 51: a) |
No (Fig. 65) |
middle |
Shape of ventral internal edge of forcipular tarsungulum |
As in Figs. 16, 18 |
As in Fig. 66 |
Single pore-fields accompanied at the anterior sides by a |
Yes (Figs. 28-41) |
No (Figs. 67-73) |
few additional pores |
Shape of pore-fields |
As in Figs. 28-41 |
As in Figs. 67-73 |
Pilosity of sternite of male ultimate leg-bearing segment |
With a few large setae distributed as |
With numerous setae placed on the |
in Fig. 57 |
posterior half (Fig. 78) |
Pilosity of sternite of female ultimate leg-bearing segment |
With a few large setae distributed as |
With numerous setae placed on the |
in Fig. 43 |
posterior third (Fig. 74) |
Posterior edge of sternite of female ultimate leg-bearing |
Slightly concave (Fig. 43) |
Slightly convex (Fig. 74) |
segment |
Coxopleura of male ultimate leg-bearing segment with |
No (with a few large setae, Fig. 57) |
Yes (Fig. 78) |
numerous setae on the distal internal ventral area |
Shape and pilosity of male ultimate legs |
As in Figs. 56, 57 |
As in Fig. 78 |
Ratio of width of tibia/width of tarsus I of male and |
ca.
1.14: 1
|
ca.
1.33: 1
|
female ultimate legs |
Male and female ultimate legs with tarsus II longer than |
No (ratio of length of tarsus II/length |
Yes (ratio of length of tarsus II/length |
tarsus I |
of tarsus I,
ca.
1.0: 1)
|
of tarsus I,
ca.
1.34: 1)
|
Shape of pretarsus of ultimate legs |
As a very small tubercle with a single |
As a very small tubercle with two |
apical spine (Figs. 44, 45) |
apical spines (Fig. 75) |
Shape of male postpedal segments |
As in Fig. 58 |
As in Fig. 80 |
Shape of male gonopods |
As in Figs. 58, 59 |
As in Fig. 80 |
Setae on basal article of male gonopods |
With a single seta (Fig. 59) |
With
ca.
6-8 setae (Fig. 79)
|
Setae on apical article of male gonopods |
Absent (Fig. 59) |
With
ca.
5-6 setae (Fig. 79)
|
Setae on apical dorsal part of penis |
Absent (Fig. 60) |
With
ca.
0+1, 1+1 (Fig. 81), 2+1 setae
|