Fig. 5 in Paralbunea dayriti Author Timms, Brian V. Honorary Research Associate, Australian Museum, 10 William St, Sydney, 2010 and Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia. * Correspondence: E-mail: brian. timms @ unsw. edu. au (Timms) brian.timms@unsw.edu.au Author Rogers, D. Christopher Kansas Biological Survey, and The Biodiversity Institute, The University of Kansas, Higuchi Hall, 2101 Constant Avenue, Lawrence, KS 66047 - 3759, USA. E-mail: Branchiopod @ gmail. com (Rogers) Branchiopod@gmail.com text Zoological Studies 2020 Zool. Stud. 2020-08-05 59 38 1 10 http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12822326 journal article 10.6620/ZS.2020.59-38 1810-522X PMC7736776 33335588 12822538 Paralimnadia feriensis comb. nov. = Eulimnadia feriensis Dakin, 1914: 300 . Pl. 2, Figs. 14–18; Richter and Timms, 2005: 348 ; Timms, 2015: 441–445 , Figs. 1–3 = Limnadia feriensis Brtek, 1997: 57 (list) Comments : This species lacks a true spiniform subcercopodal process, instead having a rounded process covered in short spines, as observed in some juvenile Eulimnadia species (DCR personal observation). The cercopod spine is placed at about 40% of the cercopod length, and there are 13 antennomeres on each flagellum ( Table 2 ). Amplexus position and sex ratios are unknown.