Taxonomic and nomenclatural changes in Cassidinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Author Sekerka, Lukáš text Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 2016 2016-07-15 56 1 275 344 journal article 56063 10.5281/zenodo.5305725 31cb15bf-28f5-4b27-86df-6a1b28cbce41 0374-1036 5305725 E24F1028-C6AC-4323-9ED5-C9B7FF3434ACD Ctenocharidotis nobiliata ( Boheman, 1855 ) Coptocycla nobiliata Boheman, 1855: 437 (original description). Coptocycla Briseis Boheman, 1862: 412 (original description), syn. nov. Type localities. Coptocycla briseis : ‘Brasilia’; Coptocycla nobiliata : ‘Brasilia’. Type material examined. Coptocycla briseis : HOLOTYPE : pinned, ‘Type [w, p, s, c, rf] || Brazil [hw] | Baly Coll. | 1905—54. [w, p, cb] || Coptocycla | Briseis | Boh | Brazil [w, hw by Baly, cb] || Coll | Fry | Named by | Boheman | Type 126 [hw by Baly on underside of preceding label] ’ ( BMNH ). Coptocycla nobiliata : HOLOTYPE : pinned, ‘ Rio Jan [w, p, s] || F. Sahlb. [w, p, cb] || Type. [w, p, s] || NHRS-JLKB | 000022074 [w, p, cb]’ ( NHRS ). Remarks. BOHEMAN (1855) explicitly described Coptocycla nobiliata from a single specimen. I also assume that Coptocycla briseis was based on a single specimen according to the original description, due to its not fully sclerotized elytra and unusual colouration. SPAETH (1926) studied a specimen compared with the type of C. briseis by G. E. Bryant and concluded that it is close to C. nobiliata , differing only in the sparser punctation of elytra. I have studied the holotype of C. briseis as well as the specimen compared by Bryant and both are teneral and not fully sclerotized. As a result, the punctation of elytra artificially appears sparser and finer than in C. nobiliata . Otherwise both taxa are identical and lead me to synonymize C. briseis with the latter species. Distribution. Brazil : Rio de Janeiro ( FLINTE et al. 2009 ).