Review of the genus Lasioseius Berlese (Acari: Blattisociidae) in Iran, and a key for identification of the Iranian species of the genus
Author
Hajizadeh, Jalil
Author
Javadpour, Mahboubeh
Author
Mohammadi, Leila
text
Persian Journal of Acarology
2023
2023-10-15
12
4
463
485
https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/62b556c3-55fa-3dd6-9f60-72f3b64dd142/
journal article
10.22073/pja.v12i4.82177
2251-8169
10943472
Lasioseius parberlesei
Bhattacharyya, 1968
(
Figs. 1–10
)
Lasioseius parberlesei
Bhattacharyya, 1968: 532
.
Indiraseius parberlesei
Daneshvar, 1987: 33
. Synonymy by
Moraes
et al
. (2015a)
.
Lasioseius parberlesei
Bhattacharyya
et al
. 2000: 93
;
Zhang and Fan 2010: 283
;
Moraes
et al
. 2016: 180
.
Lasioseius
(
Lasioseius
)
parberlesei
Christian and Karg 2006: 120
.
Description
Female (
five specimens
measured)
– Measurements are given in
Table 1
.
Dorsal idiosoma (
Fig. 1
)
– Dorsal shield oval, podonotal part scattered reticulate, with 12 pairs of setae (
j2– j6
,
z2
,
z4
,
z5
,
s4
,
s5
,
r2
,
r3
), three pairs of lyrifissures (
id1
,
id4
,
id5
) and three pairs of pores (
gd2
,
gd4
,
gd5
). Opisthonotal part reticulate, with 10 pairs of setae (J2, J4, J5, Z1, Z3-Z5, S3-
S5), five pairs of lyrifissures (
idm4
,
idm5
,
idm6
,
idl3
,
idl4
) and three pairs of pores (
gd6
,
gd8
,
gd9
). Setae
j4
,
j5
,
j6
,
J2
,
J4
,
J5
,
z5
and
r2
short; other setae longer (reaching base of next setae); most dorsal shield setae lightly serrate. Unsclerotized lateral cuticle with four pairs of short and smooth setae (
r5
,
R
1
,
R
2
and
R
5
).
Venter idiosoma (
Fig. 2
)
– Ventral setae aciculate and smooth, except
JV5
, that is thicker and serrate distally. Tritosternum 86 (74–92) long, base 12 long, laciniae 73 (62–80) long. Presternal region transversely striate. Sternal shield longer than wide, with faint reticulations, bearing three pairs of setae (
st1–st3
) and two pairs of lyrifissures (
iv1
,
iv2
). Metasternal plate rounded, bearing the fourth pair of sternal setae (
st4
) and a pair of lyrifissures (
iv3
). Genital shield with sparse striae; widest at the base, posterior margin truncate, with a pair of simple setae (
st5
); postgenital stripe continues. Two pairs of metapodal plates present, the anterior pair smaller and elongate, posterior pair longer and oval. Posterior section of endopodal shield located as a trifid plate between coxae III–IV. Ventrianal shield subtriangular, reticulated, with six pairs of setae (
JV1–JV4
,
ZV
2
,
ZV
3
) and three circumanal setae and a pair of pores, located posterolateral of para-anal setae. Soft cuticle around ventrianal shield with setae
JV5
and 3–4 pairs of lyrifissures (
ivo
). Peritreme elongated, anterior end extending to the level between setae
j2
; peritrematic plate fused with dorsal shield at level of setae
j2
.
Table 1.
Measurements of idiosma and dorsal setae of
Lasioseius parberlesei
females from five countries.
Character
1
|
Iran
2
|
Iran
3
|
Egypt
4
|
India
4
|
Pakistan
4
|
Saudi Arabia
4
|
DSL
|
376 |
410 (384–432) |
420 (384–438) |
400 (375–400) |
403 |
391 |
DSW
|
217 |
239 (230–250) |
223 (212–233) |
233 (220–228) |
223 |
205 |
j2
|
37 |
32 (30–36) |
38 (36–39) |
33 (30–35) |
34 |
35 |
j3
|
- |
34 (30–38) |
39 (39–40) |
35 (33–38) |
39 |
38 |
j4
|
18 |
20 (18–22) |
22 (22–23) |
19 (18–20) |
17 |
18 |
j5
|
18 |
21 (18–26) |
22 (21–24) |
20 (18–20) |
22 |
22 |
j6
|
27 |
27 (24–30) |
28 (27–29) |
23 (20–25) |
24 |
27 |
J2
|
17 |
18 (16–20) |
22 (19–25) |
16 (15–18) |
16 |
18 |
J4
|
18 |
16 (14–18) |
20 (19–21) |
16 (15–18) |
- |
17 |
J5
|
11 |
14 (12–16) |
17 (15–18) |
12 (10–13) |
14 |
14 |
z2
|
- |
36 (34–38) |
40 (38–41) |
35 (33–38) |
37 |
38 |
z4
|
- |
34(30–36) |
38 (36–40) |
33 (30–35) |
35 |
36 |
z5
|
29 |
28 (24–30) |
31 (29–32) |
28 (28–30) |
29 |
29 |
Z1
|
47 |
48 (46–50) |
48 (46–50) |
45 (43–48) |
45 |
48 |
Z3
|
59 |
55 (50–60) |
57 (55–59) |
52 (50–55) |
56 |
57 |
Z4
|
59 |
55 (50–60) |
58 (56–60) |
53 (53–55) |
56 |
59 |
Z5
|
68 |
70 (64–76) |
72 (70–73) |
66 (63–70) |
71 |
73 |
s4
|
40 |
40 (36–48) |
42 (40–45) |
37 (35–38) |
41 |
43 |
s5
|
47 |
44 (42–46) |
48 (47–50) |
47 (45–48) |
47 |
51 |
S3
|
38 |
41 (36–48) |
46 (43–51) |
40 (38–43) |
42 |
40 |
S4
|
46 |
44 (40–48) |
48 (45–52) |
41 (40–43) |
44 |
44 |
S5
|
51 |
50 (44–56) |
56 (54–58) |
50 (48–53) |
55 |
52 |
r2
|
18 |
18 (14–18) |
23 (22–24) |
20 (18–23) |
19 |
19 |
r3
|
48 |
47 (40–50) |
49 (47–50) |
47 (45–48) |
47 |
47 |
r5
|
18 |
16 (14–20) |
19 |
17 (15–18) |
15 |
17 |
R1
|
18 |
18 (14–22) |
20 (20–21) |
19 (18–20) |
17 |
17 |
1
L: length, W: width;
2
Daneshvar 1987
;
3
current study;
4
Moraes
et al
. 2015ª.
Table 1.
Continued.
Character
1
|
Iran
2
|
Iran
3
|
Egypt
4
|
India
4
|
Pakistan
4
|
Saudi Arabia
4
|
R2
|
18 |
19 (18–20) |
22 |
19 (18–20) |
21 |
20 |
R5
|
- |
26 (22–28) |
30 (30–31) |
26 (25–28) |
31 |
26 |
VASL
|
142 |
138 (120–144) |
145 (136–152) |
143 (138–148) |
145 |
130 |
VASW
|
168 |
169 (152–182) |
170 (162–181) |
175 (175–178) |
175 |
168 |
L base tritosterum
|
- |
12 (12–12) |
14 (13–15) |
10 |
16 |
15 |
L laciniae
|
- |
73 (62–80) |
63 (62–65) |
62 (58–65) |
66 |
74 |
SS L
|
- |
81 (75–87) |
91 (90–92) |
84 (80–88) |
95 |
93 |
SS W
|
- |
82 (80–85) |
85 (82–89) |
85 (83–85) |
83 |
86 |
GS L
|
- |
91 (87–100) |
135 (128–139 |
125 (125–133) |
138 |
123 |
GS W at post.
|
- |
78 (75–82) |
78 (78–79) |
78 (75–80) |
83 |
86 |
Anus length
|
- |
19 (17–22) |
23 (22–24) |
23 (25–27) |
23 |
23 |
St1
|
- |
21 (20–24) |
27 (25–29) |
19 (18–20) |
23 |
24 |
St2
|
- |
19 (14–20) |
26 |
19 (18–20) |
24 |
23 |
St3
|
- |
18 (12–22) |
24 |
23 (20–23) |
22 |
24 |
St4
|
- |
19 (18–20) |
25 (24–25) |
23 (20–23) |
25 |
24 |
St5
|
- |
16 (14–20) |
23 (22–23) |
19 (18–23) |
22 |
22 |
JV1
|
- |
16 (14–18) |
19 (18–20) |
20 (18–20) |
Broken |
21 |
JV2
|
- |
17 (12–20) |
20 |
20 (18–20) |
Broken |
21 |
JV3
|
- |
25 (22–30) |
28 (26–29) |
28 (25–28) |
29 |
29 |
JV4
|
- |
27 (22–30) |
31 (26–35) |
35 (28–35) |
29 |
28 |
JV5
|
- |
54 (50–60) |
61 (59–62) |
57 (55–58) |
59 |
52 |
ZV2
|
- |
18 (14–20) |
22 (20–23) |
19 (18–20) |
Broken |
21 |
ZV3
|
- |
18 (14–24) |
20 (18–21) |
19 (18–20) |
18 |
18 |
Para–anal setae
|
- |
19 (17–25) |
23 |
20 (18–23) |
21 |
22 |
Post–anal seta
|
- |
36 (32–47) |
31 (27–35) |
31 (28–33) |
36 |
33 |
Calyx
|
20 |
18 |
19 (18–20) |
15 (16–18) |
20 |
17 |
L FD
|
- |
34 (30–40) |
32 (30–33) |
28 (30–32) |
30 |
33 |
L MD
|
- |
37 (32–40) |
36 (36–37) |
38 (36–38) |
37 |
37 |
MET1 L
|
- |
20 (20–22) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
MET1 W
|
- |
6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
MET2 L
|
- |
16 (14–16) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
MET2 W
|
- |
4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Sc
|
- |
31 (30–32) |
34 (32–36) |
32 (32–34) |
32 |
32 |
h1
|
- |
26 (25–28) |
32 (31–32) |
23 (30–32) |
31 |
31 |
h2
|
- |
23 (20–25) |
22 (21–22) |
19 (18–20) |
17 |
18 |
h3
|
- |
23 (20–25) |
23 |
24 (25–28) |
27 |
25 |
leg I
|
- |
410 (400–430) |
457 (443–478) |
453 (450–465) |
465 |
428 |
leg II
|
- |
312 (300–330) |
385 (365–400) |
335 (330–340) |
385 |
368 |
leg III
|
- |
310 (300–330) |
373 (365–378) |
310 (340–350) |
373 |
343 |
leg VI
|
- |
434 (400–480) |
532 (521–543) |
465 (490–520) |
508 |
483 |
Genu IV
ad2
|
47 |
49 (45–50) |
46 (45–48) |
48 (50–52) |
43 |
44 |
Basitarsus IV
pd3
|
62 |
55 (50–58) |
59 (58–60) |
53 (50–55) |
52 |
56 |
Telotarsus IV
pd2
|
73 |
75 (70–85) |
82 (77–85) |
78 (75–80) |
81 |
82 |
1
L: length, W: width;
2
Daneshvar 1987
;
3
current study;
4
Moraes
et al
. 2015ª. Shields: DS: dorsal, GS: genital, SS: sternal, SGS: sternogenital, VAS: ventrianal; MET: metapodal; FD: fixed cheliceral digit; MD: movable cheliceral digit.
Spermatheca (
Fig. 9
)
– Calyx funnel-shaped, with swollen atrium.
Figures 1–2.
Lasioseius parberlesei
(female) – 1. Idiosoma, dorsal view; 2. Idiosoma, ventral view.
Table 2.
Measurements of characters of
Lasioseius parberlesei
males from three countries.
Character
1
|
Iran
2
|
Egypt
3
|
India
3
|
Character
1
|
Iran
2
|
Egypt
3
|
India
3
|
DSL
|
280 |
344 |
290, 300 |
L base tritosternum
|
6 |
15 |
8 |
DSW
|
232 |
186 |
150 |
L laciniae
|
50 |
43 |
60, 65 |
j2
|
24 |
25 |
25, 28 |
Anus length
|
15 |
18 |
18 |
j3
|
30 |
31 |
28, 30 |
st1
|
15 |
18 |
15, 20 |
j4
|
14 |
20 |
14, 16 |
st2
|
13 |
16 |
15, 19 |
j5
|
20 |
20 |
15, 18 |
st3
|
13 |
14 |
15, 19 |
j6
|
20 |
21 |
18, 20 |
st4
|
13 |
Broken |
13, 14 |
J2
|
12 |
15 |
11, 13 |
st5
|
13 |
Broken |
13, 15 |
J4
|
12 |
18 |
10, 13 |
JV1
|
13 |
Broken |
12, 13 |
J5
|
10 |
11 |
8, 9 |
JV2
|
14 |
Broken |
20, 21 |
z2
|
30 |
32 |
30, 32 |
JV3
|
20 |
Broken |
25, 30 |
z4
|
26 |
29 |
25, 29 |
JV5
|
26 |
Broken |
28, 31 |
z5
|
18 |
23 |
22, 23 |
ZV3
|
14 |
Broken |
- |
Z1
|
30 |
35 |
34, 38 |
Para-anal setae
|
15 |
Broken |
13, 16 |
Z3
|
46 |
45 |
43, 45 |
Post-anal seta
|
17 |
Broken |
18, 23 |
1
L: length, W: width;
2
current study;
3
Moraes
et al
. 2015ª. Shields: DS: dorsal, GS: genital, SS: sternal, SGS: sternogenital, VAS: ventrianal; MET: metapodal; FD: fixed cheliceral digit; MD: movable cheliceral digit.
Table 2.
Continued.
Character
1
|
Iran
2
|
Egypt
3
|
India
3
|
Character
1
|
Iran
2
|
Egypt
3
|
India
3
|
Z4
|
42 |
46 |
44, 45 |
L FD
|
25 |
25 |
24 |
Z5
|
52 |
55 |
52, 54 |
L MD
|
27 |
30 |
30 |
s4
|
32 |
32 |
24, 30 |
Spermatodactyl
|
25 |
29 |
30 |
s5
|
36 |
37 |
36, 38 |
h1
|
11 |
17 |
20 |
S3
|
22 |
27 |
22, 23 |
h2
|
10 |
17 |
18 |
S4
|
26 |
28 |
23, 25 |
h3
|
10 |
17 |
21 |
S5
|
32 |
31 |
30, 31 |
Sc
|
20 |
17 |
27 |
r2
|
12 |
20 |
12, 13 |
leg I
|
330 |
395 |
365 |
r3
|
40 |
41 |
35, 39 |
leg II
|
230 |
323 |
260 |
r5
|
10 |
15 |
10, 11 |
leg III
|
250 |
298 |
260 |
R1
|
10 |
15 |
10, 11 |
leg VI
|
350 |
440 |
368 |
SGS L
|
125 |
144 |
148, 165 |
Genu IV
ad2
|
38 |
SGS W at
st2
|
62 |
71 |
62-68 |
Basitarsus IV
pd3
|
48 |
VASL
|
110 |
127 |
110, 115 |
Telotarsus IV
pd2
|
63 |
VASW
|
170 |
171 |
160, 175 |
1
L: length, W: width;
2
current study;
3
Moraes
et al
. 2015ª. Shields: DS: dorsal, GS: genital, SS: sternal, SGS: sternogenital, VAS: ventrianal; MET: metapodal; FD: fixed cheliceral digit; MD: movable cheliceral digit.
Gnathosoma (
Figs. 6, 8
)
– Fixed digit of chelicera multidentate, bearing 14 teeth in addition to apical tooth; movable digit of chelicera with three teeth in addition to the apical tooth. Epistome obscure. Deutosternum with seven transverse lines of denticles.
Legs (
Fig. 10
)
– All legs pretarsi with a pair of claws and pulvillus. Leg IV with three macrosetae: on genu (
ad2
), basitarsus (
pd3
) and telotarsus (
pd2
). Leg chaetotaxy for coxa I-IV: 2; 2; 2; 1; for trochanter I-IV: 6; 5; 5; 5; for femur I-IV: 12 (2, 3/1, 2/2, 2); 11 (2, 2/1, 3/2, 1); 6 (1, 2/1, 1/0, 1); 6 (1, 2/1, 1/0, 1); for genu I-IV: 13 (2, 3/2, 3/1, 2); 11 (2, 3/1, 2/1, 2; 9 (2, 2/1, 2/1, 1); 9 (2, 2/1, 3/0, 1) and for tibia I-IV: 13 (2, 3/2, 3/1, 2); 10 (2, 2/1, 2/1, 2); 8 (2, 1/1, 2/1, 1); 10 (2, 1/1, 3/1, 2).
Male (
one specimen
measured)
– Measurements are given in
Table 2
.
Dorsal idiosoma (
Fig. 3
)
– Dorsal shield oval, podonotal and opisthonotal shields similar to those of females; setal measurements are given in
Table 2
. Unsclerotized lateral cuticle with two pairs of setae (
r5
and
R1
), both short and smooth.
Venter idiosoma (
Fig. 4
)
– Ventral setae aciculate and smooth, except
JV5
, that is thicker and serrate distally. Tritosternum 56 long, base 6 long, laciniae 50 long. Presternal region transversely striate. Sternogenital shield slightly striated on the lateral sides, with five pairs of setae (
st1–st5
) and three pairs of lyrifissures (
iv1- iv3
). Ventrianal shield subtriangular, reticulate, with five pairs of setae (
JV1–JV3
,
JV5
and
ZV3
) in addition to the circum-anal setae and a pair of marginal pores located posterolateral of para-anal setae. Soft cuticle around ventrianal shield without opisthogastric setae. Peritreme elongated, anterior end extending to the level between setae
j2
; peritrematic plate fused with dorsal shield at level of setae
r2
.
Gnathosoma (
Fig. 5
)
– Fixed digit of chelicera bearing eight to nine teeth and setiform pilus dentilis in addition to apical tooth; movable digit of chelicera with one tooth in addition to the apical tooth; spermatodactyl long, cylindrical, with a hook-like bend tip in distal section. Epistome obscure. Deutosternum with six transverse lines of denticles.
Legs
– Legs similar to female. Leg IV with three macrosetae: on genu (
ad2
), on basitarsus (
pd3
) and telotarsus (
pd2
). Leg chaetotaxy as in adult female.
Figures 3–4.
Lasioseius parberlesei
(male) – 3. Idiosoma, dorsal view; 4. Idiosoma, ventral view.
Figures 5–10.
Lasioseius parberlesei
– 5. Male, Chelicera. 6–10. Female. 6. Chelicera; 7. Tritosternum; 8. Hypostome; 9. Spermatheca (without scale); 10. Femur-tarsus of leg IV.
Material examined
–
Two females
, Rasht, Fakhrabad,
37° 24' 20'' N
,
49° 52' 47'' E
, −
22 m
a.s.l.,
September 2012
, collected from infected leaves with eriophyid mites;
two females
, Masuleh,
37° 9' 37'' N
,
48° 59' 32'' E
,
1050 m
a.s.l.,
August 2015
, collected from rice farm;
one female
, Daylaman 36° 88' 83'' N, 49° 90' 64'' E,
2200 m
a.s.l.,
June 2015
, collected from soil;
four females
, Rasht, Sangar,
37° 10' 59" N
,
49° 38' 42" E
,
34 m
a.s.l.,
July 2019
, collected from plant in the greenhouse;
10 females
, Rasht,
37° 16' 51'' N
,
49° 34' 59'' E
,
4 m
a.s.l.,
September 2019
, collected from light traps;
one female
, Bandar Anzali,
37° 28'22'' N
,
49° 27' 44" E
, −
26 m
,
October 2020
, collected on Citrus tree.
Habitat and distribution in
Iran
–
Guilan Province
(Lahijan, Rasht, Masuleh, Sangar, Daylaman), mulberry, tea, rice farm, fig, raspberry, decaying plants, soil, plants and associated with eriophyid mite, wood sorrel,
Oxalis acetosella
L. (
Oxalidaceae
) and rose,
Rosa damascena
(
Rosaceae
) leaves infested with spider mites (
Daneshvar 1987
;
Kamali
et al
. 2001
;
Hajizadeh
et al
. 2010a
, b, 2020;
Adeli
et al.
2013
;
Javadpour
et al
. 2018
;
Ghasemi and Hajizadeh 2020
;
Navran and Hajizadeh 2021
);
Mazandaran Province
(Behshahr), on fig tree (
Daneshvar 1987
);
Isfahan Province
(Najaf Abad, Zarrin Shahr, Falavarjan, Dorcheh), soil of fruit trees orchards (
Jalaeian
et al
. 2006
).
World Distribution
–
Egypt
,
India
,
Iran
,
Pakistan
,
Philippines
,
Saudi Arabia
,
Syria
and
Taiwan
(
Santos
et al
. 2023
;
Daneshvar 1987
).
Taxonomic note on synonymy of
Indiraseius extremus
with
Lasioseius parberlesei
The genus
Indiraseius
was established by
Daneshvar (1987)
based on mite specimens collected from Northern
Iran
(
Guilan
and Mazandran Provinces). He designated
Lasioseius parberlesei
Bhattacharyya, 1968
as the
type
species for the genus
Indiraseius
and described
Indiraseius extremus
as the second species within this genus. However,
Walter and Lindquist (1997)
considered the genus
Indiraseius
Daneshvar
as a synonym of
Lasioseius
Berlese.
Moraes
et al.
(2015a)
also regarded
Lasioseius extremus
(
Daneshvar, 1987
)
as a synonym of
Lasioseius parberlesei
Bhattacharyya, 1968
. However, they did not have access to the
type
material of
Lasioseius extremus
for close examination.
Moraes
et al.
(2016)
chose to retain these two species as distinct species but did not provide an explanation for this decision, nor did they provide details of the examined specimens.
In the present study, we collected specimens of
Lasioseius parberlesei
from the same locations where
Daneshvar (1987)
collected the
type
material of
Indiraseius extremus
. We conducted a comparison of setal measurements and other characteristics of female specimens of
Lasioseius parberlesei
collected from
Iran
(including
Daneshvar's 1987
measurements for
Indiraseius extremus
) and those from four different countries (
Egypt
,
India
,
Pakistan
, and
Saudi Arabia
), which are presented in
Table 1
. The results demonstrate a close similarity between the characteristics of
Indiraseius extremus
and
Lasioseius parberlesei
from
Iran
and the four other countries (
Table 1
). Only
one male
specimen of
L
.
parberlesei
was collected in this study. We compared setal measurements and other characteristics of the male specimen from
Iran
with specimens from
Egypt
and
India
, and the results are presented in
Table 2
. The data indicate a close similarity between the characteristics of the Iranian male specimen and those of male specimens from
Egypt
and
India
(
Table 2
). Based on these findings, it can be concluded that
Indiraseius extremus
is a synonym of
Lasioseius parberlesei
.