A new subfamily classification of the highly diversified Dorippidae H. Milne Edwards, 1837 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Dorippoidea), using morphological, molecular and palaeotonlogical data, with special emphasis on its unique female reproductive system Author Guinot, Danièle Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Université des Antilles, case postale 53, 57 rue Cuvier, F- 75231 Paris cedex 05 (France) daniele. guinot @ mnhn. fr Dedicated to the memory of my colleague and dearest friend Ngan Kee NG (1966 - 2022) guinot@mnhn.fr text Zoosystema 2023 2023-06-05 45 9 225 372 journal article 10.5252/zoosystema2023v45a9 1638-9387 8071253 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:69C34731-8C25-4A1E-B336-B222CD3CBAC3 Ethusa evae Müller & Collins, 1991 Ethusa evae Müller & Collins, 1991: 66 , fig. 3h, pl. 4, figs 1, 2. — Pálfy et al. 2008: Catalogue. — De Angeli et al. 2010: 176. — Schweitzer et al. 2010: 80; 2021: 3. — Baldanza et al. 2017: 52. — Beschin et al. 2019: table 1. — Sasaki 2019: 7814. — Van Bakel et al. 2020: fig. 10.15. REMARKS Ethusa evae , from the Upper Eocene (Priabonian), Hungary , has a subsquare carapace, well-developed outer orbital spines and fairly wide orbits. These characters are not typical of either Ethusa or an ethusid and we agree with Müller & Collins (1991: 67) that the outline of E. evae is somewhat reminiscent of Binkhorstia ubaghsi (Van Binkhorst, 1857) from the Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian). The identification of this species, in any case not a dorippoid, should be carefully reconsidered.