diff --git a/data/03/FC/87/03FC8790FFAEFFABFCAE4FB4C6FEC97C.xml b/data/03/FC/87/03FC8790FFAEFFABFCAE4FB4C6FEC97C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c9819141115 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/FC/87/03FC8790FFAEFFABFCAE4FB4C6FEC97C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1034 @@ + + + +Discovery of a Distinctive Spotted Color Pattern in the Cuskeel Neobythites unicolor (Teleostei, Ophidiidae) Based on Underwater-Vehicle Dives, with New Records from the Southern and Eastern Caribbean + + + +Author + +Uiblein, Franz + + + +Author + +Nielsen, Jørgen G. + + + +Author + +Baldwin, Carole C. + + + +Author + +Quattrini, Andrea M. + + + +Author + +Robertson, Ross + +text + + +Copeia + + +2019 + +2019-05-20 + + +107 + + +2 + + +277 +286 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1643/ci-18-148 + +journal article +10.1643/CI-18-148 +2766-1520 +13230719 + + + + + + + +Neobythites unicolor +Nielsen and Retzer, 1994 + + + + + + + +Figures 1–5 +, +Tables 1 +, +2 + + + + + + + +Neobythites unicolor +Nielsen and Retzer, 1994: 993 + + +, fig. 2a; + +Nielsen, 1999: 354–358 + +, figs. 11–13. + + + + + + + +Holotype +.— + +FMNH 69349 +, +90 mm +SL, female, +East Caribbean Sea +, 17838.5 + +0 + +N, 63827 + +0 + +W, +RV + +Oregon + +, Sta. 2633, bottom trawl, + +348 m +depth + +, + +30 September 1959 + +. + + + + + +Paratypes +.— + +( + +n +¼ + +8, +58–104 mm +SL) +FMNH +69348, 103 mm +, female, +East Caribbean Sea +, 1883 + +0 + +N, 67827 + +0 + +W + +, + +RV + +Oregon + +, +Sta. +2643, bottom trawl, + +275–330 m +depth + +, + +5 October 1959 + + +; + +FMNH 69352 +, +82 mm +SL, female + +, + +ZMUC +P + +77940, 104 m + + + +SL, male, +West Caribbean +Sea, RV + +Oregon + +, +Sta. +1868, bottom trawl, + +320 m +depth + +, + +21 August 1957 + + +; + +FMNH +69354, 100 mm +SL, female, +East Caribbean Sea +, 18812 + +0 + +N, 67818 + +0 + +W + +, + +RV + +Oregon + +, +Sta. +2648, bottom trawl, + +275 m +depth + +, + +6 October 1959 + + +; + +TCWC 4469.3 +, +58–89 mm +SL, +2 females +, +West Caribbean Sea +, 20820.5 + +0 + +N, 89819.4 + +0 + +W + +, + +MBI +, +Sta. +168, 10 + +0 + +otter trawl, 240–267 + + + + +Table 1. Image documentation for + +Neobythites unicolor + +encountered and partly collected by underwater vehicles and a paratype (PT) of this species used for comparisons, with information on treatment conditions under which the photographs were taken. *Dive number not recorded. **Photo from + + + +video footage. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Treatment condition for photographs taken +
+Collection + +Shortly after + +After long-term + +Time after +
+number + +Size (SL) + +Dive + +Locality + +In situ + +collection + +freezing + +fixation +
USNM 42266893 mm +MUV +Curasub +13-nn* +off Curaçao——X508 days
USNM 43133194 mm +MUV +Curasub +14-01 +off CuraçaoXX—211 days
USNM 43172169 mm +MUV +Curasub +14-15 +off CuraçaoXX—179 days
USNM 43349738 mm +MUV +Curasub +14-25 +off Curaçao—X—95 days
USNM 44057065 mm +MUV +Curasub +15-29 +off Dominica—X—460 days
USNM 444965ca.10 cmHI1305near Virgin Islands**X———
USNM 444964ca. 8 cmEX1502L3-3off Puerto Rico**X———
ZMUC P77940,
PT104 mm—W Caribbean Sea———57 years
+ + +m, + + +11 April 1976 + +; +TCWC 6207.2 +, +93 mm +SL, female, +100 mm +SL, +Western Caribbean Sea +, 20826.3 + +0 + +N, 87814.7 + +0 + +W, +MBI +, Sta. 167, otter trawl, + +253–276 m +depth + + +, +11 April 1976 +. + + +Non-type material.— +( + +n +¼ + +19, +49–103 mm +SL) + +MCZ 39257 +, +88 mm +SL, female, off +Cuba +, 22813 + +0 + +N, 81810.5 + +0 + +W + +, + +RV + +Atlantis, +Sta. + +3319, 357– + +393 m +depth + +, + +4 April 1938 + + +; + +MCZ 39327 +, +93 mm +SL, male, off +Cuba +, 22849 + +0 + +N, 78848 + +0 + +W + +, + +RV + +Atlantis, +Sta. + + +3412, 430 m +depth + +, + +29 April 1938 + + +; + +MCZ 39396 +, +75 mm +SL, male, off +Cuba +, 22848 + +0 + +N, 7989 + +0 + +W + +, + +RV + +Atlantis, +Sta. + + +3422, 430 m +depth + +, + +30 April 1938 + + +; + +MCZ 41866 +, +72 mm +SL, female, +Gulf of Mexico +, 2588 + +0 + +N, 84819 + +0 + +W + +, + +RV + +Oregon +, + +Sta. + +1026, 298 m +depth + +, + +19 April 1938 + + +; + +UF 202019 +, +93 mm +SL, male + +, + +ZMUC +P771190 +, +81 mm +SL, female, off +Cuba +, 22855 + +0 + +N, 79816 + +0 + +W + +, + +RV + +Oregon +, + +Sta. + +1341, 439 m +depth + +, + +16 July 1955 + + +; + +UF 214148 +, +94 mm +SL, female, +49 mm +SL, male + +, + +ZMUC +P771191 +, +84 mm +SL, female, off +Grand Bahama Is. +, 27825 + +0 + +N, 78841 + +0 + +W + +, + +RV + +Gerda +, Sta. + +251, 306– + +311 m +depth + +, + +5 February 1964 + + +; + +UF 230529 +, +78– 103 mm +SL, +1 female +, +3 males + +, + +ZMUC +P771189 +, +85 mm +SL, female, +Turks +Is. Passage +, 20853.1 + +0 + +N, 71836 + +0 + +W + +, + +RV + +Pillsbury +, + +Sta. +1425, 737– + +787 m + +, + +19 July 1971 + + +; + +USNM 309225 +, +73–99 mm +SL, +1 female +, +4 males +, off +Saba +, 17838.5 + +0 + +N, 63827 + +0 + +W + +, + +RV + +Oregon +, + +Sta. +2633, 40 + +0 + +flat trawl, + +348 m +depth + +, + +30 September 1959 + + +. + + +Submersible-collected specimens for this study.— +( + +n +¼ + +5, +38–94 mm +SL) + +USNM 422668 +, +93 mm +SL, off +Curaçao +, near aquarium, 12804 + + +0 + +59 + +00 + +N + +, 68853 + + +0 + +57 + +00 + +W + +, + +Curasub + +dive 13 nn (no dive and depth data), +A. Schrier +and +B. Brandt +, 2013 + +; + +USNM 431331 +, +94 mm +SL, female, same locality as above, + +Curasub + +dive 14-01, + +305 m +depth + +, +C. C. Baldwin +, D + +. + +R +. +Robertson +, and +B. Brandt +, + +17 March 2014 + + +; + +USNM 431721 +, +69 mm +SL, off +Curaçao +, near +Jan Thiel Bay +, 12804 + + +0 + +59 + +00 + +N + +, 68853 + + +0 + +57 + +00 + +W + +, + +Curasub + +dive + +14-15, 305 m +depth + +, +C. C. Baldwin +, +A. Schrier +, and B. +Brandt +, + +19 September 2014 + + +; + +USNM 433497 +, +38 mm +SL, off +Curaçao +, near aquarium, 12804 + + +0 + +59 + +00 + +N + +, 68853 + + +0 + +56 + +00 + +W + +, + +Curasub + +dive + +14-25, 269 m +depth + +, found living inside a beer bottle, +C. C. Baldwin +, +B. van Bebber +, and C. +Castillo +, + +9 December 2014 + + +; + +USNM 440570 +, +65 mm +SL, off western coast of +Dominica +, 15834 + + +0 + +23 + +00 + +N + +, 61828 + + +0 + +28 + +00 + +W + +, + +Curasub + +dive + +16-29, 289 m +depth + +, +A. Schrier +and +B. Brandt +, + +29 March 2016 + + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/68/1F/A8/681FA836FF9F1077264FF92DFB5C1F1B.xml b/data/68/1F/A8/681FA836FF9F1077264FF92DFB5C1F1B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..780e9247a7b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/68/1F/A8/681FA836FF9F1077264FF92DFB5C1F1B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1078 @@ + + + +Redescription and Recognition of Etheostoma cyanorum from Blue River, Oklahoma + + + +Author + +Matthews, William J. + + + +Author + +Turner, Thomas F. + +text + + +Copeia + + +2019 + +2019-04-11 + + +107 + + +2 + + +208 +218 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1643/ci-18-054 + +journal article +10.1643/CI-18-054 +2766-1520 +13230705 + + + + + + + +Etheostoma cyanorum +( +Moore and Rigney, 1952 +) + +, elevated + +to species + + +Blue River Orangebelly Darter + + + +Figures 2 +, +3 +; +Tables 1 +, +2 +; Supplemental Table A + + + + + + +Holotype +.— + +UMMZ 161366 +, +holotype +of + +Poecilichthys whipplii cyanorum + +, adult breeding male, +68 mm +SL, designated by +Moore and Rigney (1952) +, collected by +Moore +in +1949 in +Blue + + + + + +FIG. 3. (A) Male + +E. cyanorum +, + +63 mm SL, in nuptial color, from mainstem Blue River, 1.7 km west-northwest of Connerville, OK, 30 March 2018 (WJM 3645; OMNH 86859); (B) female + +E. cyanorum +, + +41 mm SL, same collection (OMNH 86860). Location: 34 + +8 + +27.0670 +N, 96 + +8 + +39.3270 + +W. Photographs by N. Lang. (C) Detail of distal color band in nuptial male from same collection, same date (OMNH 86861). Photograph by WJM. + + + + +River at State Hwy 99 north of +Connerville +, +Johnston County +, +Oklahoma +( +Fig. 2 +) + +. + + + +Paratypes +.— + + +Paratypes +include 329 individuals collected by +Moore +or students from the +Blue River +drainage (museum acronyms and catalog numbers, +Moore and Rigney, 1952 +: p. 10) + +. + + + + + +Diagnosis.— +Etheostoma cyanorum + +differs from + +E. radiosum + +by their allopatric distribution, with + +E. cyanorum + +known only from Blue River and tributaries, versus + +E. radiosum + +occupying tributaries of Washita River west of Blue River and all drainages eastward from the Clear Boggy to the upper Ouachita and Little +Missouri +in southwest +Arkansas +. + +Etheostoma cyanorum + +differs from + +E. radiosum + +in having all assayed mtDNA haplotypes not shared with + +E. radiosum + +, lower counts of unpored lateral line scales, higher counts of pored lateral line scales, and a wider interorbital distance. + +Etheostoma cyanorum + +can be distinguished by a deeper and wider head from + +E. radiosum + +in all +Oklahoma +drainages, and in most but not all drainages in +Arkansas +. Nuptial males of + +Etheostoma cyanorum + +differ from nuptial + +E. radiosum + +in the geographically closest drainages (Washita, Clear Boggy, Muddy Boggy, and Kiamichi) by a solid blue distal band in the spinous dorsal ( +Fig. 3C +), compared to the distal blue band in those populations of + +E. radiosum + +( +¼ + +E. r. paludosum + +of Moore and Rigney) having an appearance of blue ‘‘dots’’ or ‘‘spots’’ bordered in white, between clear or orange tips of the fin spines. + + + + + +Description.— +Etheostoma cyanorum + +is a moderately large darter of the clade +Vexillapinna +( +Near et al., 2011 +) and subgenus + +Oligocephalus +( +Lang and Mayden, 2006 +) + +, averaging about +45 mm +standard length; largest specimens about +70 mm +SL. +Holotype +meristics, morphometrics, and colors in +Moore and Rigney (1952) +. Meristics and morphometrics from +Moore and Rigney (1952) +and Gelwick and +Matthews (1988) +compared in Supplemental Table A (see Data Accessibility). Snout decurved and blunt in large adults, less so in smaller individuals. +Moore and Rigney (1952) +noted, for unusually large +holotype +, ‘‘back is little elevated, sloping in almost a straight line to the caudal peduncle.’’ In smaller individuals, head slopes upward at about a 208 angle from eye to occiput with pronounced hump at the occiput, dorsum then elevated about 158 from horizontal posteriorly to origin of dorsal fin, beyond which body is relatively uniform depth to origin of soft dorsal and anal fins, beyond which dorsum and caudal peduncle taper slightly to caudal base. Lateral line scales average 55; unpored lateral line scales average 5.9; pored lateral line scales average 49. Dorsal spines average 10.4; dorsal soft rays average 13.6; anal-fin soft rays 7 to 8; pectoral-fin rays typically 12; pelvic-fin rays invariant at 6. Gill rakers average 10. Average measurements (in thousandths of standard length): predorsal length 345; body depth 205; caudal peduncle depth 116; head length 269; head depth 170; interorbital width 54; eye diameter 67; gape width 73; snout length 69. Distribution of scales on head and body in +Moore and Rigney (1952) +; tuberculation in +Collette (1965) +; natural history and ecology in +Scalet (1971) +. + + + +Table 1. Meristic characters for + +Etheostoma cyanorum + +(Blue drainage), including minimum, maximum, mean, and standard deviation, compared to 13 populations of + +Etheostoma radiosum + +. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+River + +Clear + +Muddy + +Mountain + +Rolling + +Little +
+drainage + +Blue + +Washita + +Boggy + +Boggy + +Kiamichi + +Little + +Glover + +Fork + +Fork + +Cossatot + +Saline + +Ouachita + +Caddo + +Missouri +
+n +4071321532151515151518171615
Unpored lateral line scales
Minimum03374699876895
Maximum1024151416181815151013181615
Mean5.19.79.810.710.513.511.912.312.38.69.612.612.610.0
SD2.03.12.71.72.83.22.41.82.21.22.03.22.22.6
Pored lateral line scales
Minimum4333393939423943364038363334
Maximum5854525048525649495047454844
Mean49.544.845.343.643.745.946.445.944.045.641.940.239.238.9
SD4.03.52.92.92.42.73.72.13.32.42.63.03.42.9
+ + +Coloration.— +Coloration as in +Moore and Rigney (1952) +and +Scalet (1971) +, except nuptial male + +E. cyanorum + +have more yellow or yellowish-orange on cheeks and lower sides of head and body ( +Fig. 3A +) than does + +E. radiosum + +, particularly + +E. radiosum + +in Ouachita River drainage where coloration is more reddish-orange ( +Matthews and Gelwick, 1988 +). Reproductive females drab in comparison to males; light yellow on cheeks and pectoral, anal, and caudal fins, and light orange below the opercle ( +Fig. 3B +). Distal blue bar in spinous dorsal of nuptial male + +E. cyanorum + +solid band passing across the membranes and including the spine tips, except the two posterior spines ( +Fig. 3C +). + + +Snout shape not diagnostic.— +Moore and Rigney (1952) +considered blunt snout diagnostic of + +E. r. cyanorum + +, but this is strongly influenced by body size. +Table 1 +of Moore and Rigney showed snout length of + +E. cyanorum + +went fewest times into head length compared to other subspecies, + + + +Table 2. Morphometric characters for + +Etheostoma cyanorum + +(Blue drainage), including minimum, maximum, mean, and standard deviation, compared to 13 populations of + +Etheostoma radiosum + +. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+River + +Clear + +Muddy + +Mountain Rolling + +Little +
+drainage + +Blue Washita Boggy + +Boggy Kiamichi + +Little + +Glover + +Fork + +Fork + +Cossatot Saline + +Ouachita + +Caddo + +Missouri +
Percents of standard length
+n +3962321533151514151518171515
Interorbital width
Minimum4.52.93.43.93.64.14.04.14.14.03.94.74.44.2
Maximum6.55.65.75.25.76.55.35.25.75.45.35.65.85.9
Mean5.54.54.64.84.64.94.64.85.04.84.65.15.04.8
SD0.50.40.50.30.50.60.30.30.40.40.40.30.50.4
Head depth
Minimum16.314.215.415.114.415.015.015.715.215.215.014.815.715.5
Maximum19.317.518.717.617.517.017.817.817.717.519.118.718.218.5
Mean17.915.816.916.315.915.816.816.316.416.517.417.117.117.3
SD0.80.70.80.80.80.60.80.60.70.71.10.90.70.8
Head width
Minimum13.311.212.212.711.812.212.012.110.912.512.913.112.213.3
Maximum16.415.315.514.314.614.014.114.814.515.016.215.716.216.6
Mean14.713.614.013.513.013.213.413.213.413.914.714.613.814.8
SD0.80.90.90.50.70.60.60.80.90.71.00.91.11.0
Body depth
Minimum18.016.018.518.417.019.117.619.117.919.218.618.918.118.8
Maximum24.020.222.120.021.921.523.922.120.822.323.822.521.322.3
Mean20.518.220.219.219.620.120.320.319.520.720.720.619.720.8
SD1.20.91.00.41.40.81.70.80.71.01.40.91.10.9
+ + + +FIG. 4. Angle of the anterior profile for 11 male + +E. cyanorum + +, from Blue River in September 1994, with significant trendline, and the holotype (indicated by arrow; not included in regression or in trendline). + + + +suggesting a longer, not shorter, snout length. +Matthews and Gelwick (1988 +, their table 5) also found that specimens from Blue River had longest mean snout length, pointing out that a ‘‘blunt’’ snout is not necessarily equivalent to a ‘‘short’’ snout if the snout is greatly curved downward and is properly measured from eye to snout tip (on an angle) per +Hubbs and Lagler (1964) +. Indication that a ‘‘blunt’’ snout was diagnostic ( +Moore and Rigney, 1952 +) was based on the large +holotype +( +68 mm +SL) described as ‘‘very robust,’’ with a head ‘‘quite blunt’’ and ‘‘sharply decurved from the eyes to the snout tip.’’ The +holotype +( +Fig. 2 +) is larger than any of + +300 +þ + +typically sized individuals evaluated by +Matthews and Gelwick (1988 +; mean +¼ +45, maximum +¼ +64 mm +SL). The +holotype +, although faded ( +Fig. 2 +), is well preserved, with extremely downturned snout, blunt face, and deep body per Moore and Rigney, but their description only applies to very large specimens. Of six nuptial males from Blue River +August 2017 +, ranging +47 to 60 mm +SL, only the largest (upper right in Supplemental Figure B; see Data Accessibility) approaches bluntness of snout described by +Moore and Rigney (1952) +. For +11 males +ranging +35 to 69 mm +SL collected in the upper Blue River on +24 September 1994 +, larger individuals had a significantly more obtuse angle (regression of AAP on SL, +P +¼ +0.0015) between the horizontal axis of the body and the snout ( +Fig. 4 +). The +holotype +had a wider AAP (648) between axis of the body than any specimens we examined ( +Fig. 4 +), confirming that the +holotype +was an individual with an unusually blunt snout. + + +Allometry.— +Three other head or body traits have strong to moderate allometric trends. In Supplemental Figure C (see Data Accessibility), +26 male + +E. cyanorum + +used in +Matthews and Gelwick (1988) +from three locations in Blue River, traits (parts per thousand of standard length) are plotted against standard length with a trendline added by the Excel linear trendline function for significant regressions. Larger males had relatively shorter snouts (regression +P +¼ +0.068), consistent with the results in the section above, deeper bodies (regression +P +¼ +0.011), and a weak, but non-significant trend for a deeper caudal peduncle (Supplemental Figure C; see Data Accessibility). + + + + + +Distribution.— +Etheostoma cyanorum + +is known only from the Blue River drainage in southcentral +Oklahoma +, a tributary of Red River. It is most abundant in the upper, spring-fed, rocky portions of the drainage, and in some small tributary creeks, + +but is scarce or absent in lower, muddy portions of the drainage closer to Red River. + + + +Etymology.— +The specific name ‘‘ + +cyanorum + +’’ ( +¼ +‘‘of the Blues’’ referring to Blue River) was suggested for the subspecies, on advice from R. M. Bailey ( +Moore and Rigney, 1952 +), to reflect restriction of this form to Blue River and its tributaries. +Linder (1955) +and +Echelle et al. (2015) +referred to it as the ‘‘Blue River Orangebelly Darter,’’ but +Near et al. (2011) +called it ‘‘Blue Darter.’’ We follow +Linder (1955) +and +Echelle et al. (2015) +and recommend the common name ‘‘Blue River Orangebelly Darter,’’ because + +E. cyanorum + +is not predominantly blue in coloration. This common name aligns with the practice of referring to other fishes in +Oklahoma +in a drainage-specific manner, including Red River Pupfish ( + +Cyprinodon rubrofluviatilis + +), Red River Shiner ( + +Notropis bairdi + +), and +Arkansas +River Shiner ( + +Notropis girardi + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/AB/10/E0/AB10E025FF84FFC1C296FE41FA53FD6B.xml b/data/AB/10/E0/AB10E025FF84FFC1C296FE41FA53FD6B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5e6871b551f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/AB/10/E0/AB10E025FF84FFC1C296FE41FA53FD6B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ + + + +Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Flatheads, Scorpionfishes, Sea Robins, and Stonefishes (Percomorpha: Scorpaeniformes) and the Evolution of the Lachrymal Saber + + + +Author + +Smith, W. Leo + + + +Author + +Everman, Elizabeth + + + +Author + +Richardson, Clara + +text + + +Copeia + + +2018 + +2018-02-15 + + +106 + + +1 + + +94 +119 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1643/cg-17-669 + +journal article +10.1643/CG-17-669 +2766-1520 +13230683 + + + + + + +Triglidae Rafinesque, 1815 + + + + + + + +Type +genus: + + +Trigla +Linnaeus, 1758 + + + +Sister taxon: +Hoplichthyidae + + +Concept and content: +173 species classified in four subfamilies and 15 genera: Peristediinae: + +Gargariscus +, +Heminodus +, +Paraheminodus +, +Peristedion +, +Satyrichthys +, + +and + +Scalicus + +; Prionotinae: + +Bellator + +and + +Prionotus + +; Pterygotriglinae: + +Bovitrigla + +and + +Pterygotrigla + +; Triglinae: + +Chelidonichthys +, +Eutrigla +, +Lepidotrigla +, +Trigla +, + +and + +Trigloporus + + + +Phenotypic diagnosis: +First and third circumorbitals attached (character 2, state 1); third circumorbital and lateral ethmoid attached (character 4, state 1); nasal and neurocranium sutured (character 14, state 1); notch between ascending process and cranial condyle absent (character 27, state 1); + +transversus +ventralis +anterior + +and +posterior +separated (character 92, state 1); + +transversus +ventralis +posterior + +with a tendon anteriorly (character 93, state 1); division of bundles of +adductor superficialis +serving free pectoral-fin rays present (character 95, state 1). + + +Support statistics: +The bootstrap support for this clade was 1.00. + + +Systematic comment: +Familial classification and treatment of Peristediinae as a triglid subfamily follows our phylogeny and the phylogeny from Portnoy et al. (2017). The remaining triglid subfamilies follow the tribes from Richards and Jones (2002). Generic composition and species recognition follow Kawai (2008) and +Eschmeyer +et al. (2017). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/AB/10/E0/AB10E025FF85FFC0C27FF8E7FB68FE69.xml b/data/AB/10/E0/AB10E025FF85FFC0C27FF8E7FB68FE69.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..375661ea984 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/AB/10/E0/AB10E025FF85FFC0C27FF8E7FB68FE69.xml @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ + + + +Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Flatheads, Scorpionfishes, Sea Robins, and Stonefishes (Percomorpha: Scorpaeniformes) and the Evolution of the Lachrymal Saber + + + +Author + +Smith, W. Leo + + + +Author + +Everman, Elizabeth + + + +Author + +Richardson, Clara + +text + + +Copeia + + +2018 + +2018-02-15 + + +106 + + +1 + + +94 +119 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1643/cg-17-669 + +journal article +10.1643/CG-17-669 +2766-1520 +13230683 + + + + + + +Plectrogeniidae Fowler, 1938 + + + + + + + +Type +genus: + + +Plectrogenium +Gilbert, 1905 + + + +Sister taxon: +Neosebastidae + + +Concept and content: +Four species classified in two genera: + +Bembradium + +and + +Plectrogenium + + + +Phenotypic diagnosis: +Skinny lateral-line sensory canal between pterotic and preopercle absent (character 23, state 1); posterior pelvic fossa present, fossae meeting (character 52, state 1); dorsal-fin stay cartilaginous (character 66, state 2); anal-fin stay cartilaginous (character 67, state 2); +hyohyoides inferioris +present (character 84, state 1). + + +Support statistics: +The bootstrap support for this clade was 0.34. + + +Systematic comment: +Familial classification follows Imamura (1996). Generic composition and species recognition follow +Eschmeyer +et al. (2017). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/AB/10/E0/AB10E025FF85FFC0C27FFABBFF1FF8EC.xml b/data/AB/10/E0/AB10E025FF85FFC0C27FFABBFF1FF8EC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5b27a65e2a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/AB/10/E0/AB10E025FF85FFC0C27FFABBFF1FF8EC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ + + + +Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Flatheads, Scorpionfishes, Sea Robins, and Stonefishes (Percomorpha: Scorpaeniformes) and the Evolution of the Lachrymal Saber + + + +Author + +Smith, W. Leo + + + +Author + +Everman, Elizabeth + + + +Author + +Richardson, Clara + +text + + +Copeia + + +2018 + +2018-02-15 + + +106 + + +1 + + +94 +119 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1643/cg-17-669 + +journal article +10.1643/CG-17-669 +2766-1520 +13230683 + + + + + + +Platycephalidae Swainson, 1839 + + + + + + + +Type +genus: + + +Platycephalus +Bloch, 1795 + + + +Sister taxon: +Hoplichthyidae +þ +Triglidae + + +Concept and content: +84 species classified in two subfamilies and 17 genera: Oniigociinae: + +Ambiserrula +, +Cociella +, +Cymbacephalus +, +Grammoplites +, +Inegocia +, +Kumococius +, +Onigocia +, +Papilloculiceps +, +Ratabulus +, +Rogadius +, +Solitas +, +Suggrundus +, +Sunagocia +, + +and + +Thysanophrys + +; Platycephalinae: + +Elates + +and + +Platycephalus +; incertae sedis: +Leviprora + + + +Phenotypic diagnosis: +No unambiguously optimized morphological synapomorphies diagnose +Platycephalidae +, although the family is supported by a morphological transformation through accelerated character optimization. + + +Support statistics: +The bootstrap support for this clade was 0.97. + + +Systematic comment: +Familial and subfamilial classification follows Imamura (1996). Generic composition and species recognition follow +Eschmeyer +et al. (2017) except for the synonymy of + +Sorsogona + +in + +Ratabulus + +following Imamura (1996). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/AB/10/E0/AB10E025FF85FFC0C27FFCCAFD67FB40.xml b/data/AB/10/E0/AB10E025FF85FFC0C27FFCCAFD67FB40.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4c2ded70b39 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/AB/10/E0/AB10E025FF85FFC0C27FFCCAFD67FB40.xml @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ + + + +Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Flatheads, Scorpionfishes, Sea Robins, and Stonefishes (Percomorpha: Scorpaeniformes) and the Evolution of the Lachrymal Saber + + + +Author + +Smith, W. Leo + + + +Author + +Everman, Elizabeth + + + +Author + +Richardson, Clara + +text + + +Copeia + + +2018 + +2018-02-15 + + +106 + + +1 + + +94 +119 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1643/cg-17-669 + +journal article +10.1643/CG-17-669 +2766-1520 +13230683 + + + + + + +Neosebastidae Matsubara, 1943 + + + + + + + +Type +genus: + + +Neosebastes +Guichenot, 1867 + + + +Sister taxon: +Plectrogeniidae + + +Concept and content: +18 species classified in two genera: + +Maxillicosta + +and + +Neosebastes + + + +Phenotypic diagnosis: +No unambiguously optimized morphological synapomorphies diagnose +Neosebastidae +, although the family is supported by a morphological transformation through accelerated character optimization. + + +Support statistics: +The bootstrap support for this clade was 1.00. + + +Systematic comment: +Familial and generic composition and species recognition follow +Eschmeyer +et al. (2017). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/AB/10/E0/AB10E025FF8AFFC0C143F8B8FD67FCF1.xml b/data/AB/10/E0/AB10E025FF8AFFC0C143F8B8FD67FCF1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..71416a47d7c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/AB/10/E0/AB10E025FF8AFFC0C143F8B8FD67FCF1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@ + + + +Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Flatheads, Scorpionfishes, Sea Robins, and Stonefishes (Percomorpha: Scorpaeniformes) and the Evolution of the Lachrymal Saber + + + +Author + +Smith, W. Leo + + + +Author + +Everman, Elizabeth + + + +Author + +Richardson, Clara + +text + + +Copeia + + +2018 + +2018-02-15 + + +106 + + +1 + + +94 +119 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1643/cg-17-669 + +journal article +10.1643/CG-17-669 +2766-1520 +13230683 + + + + + + +Hoplichthyidae Kaup, 1873 + + + + + + + +Type +genus: + + +Hoplichthys +Cuvier + +in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1829 + + +Sister taxon: +Triglidae + + +Concept and content: +17 species classified in one genus: + +Hoplichthys + + + +Phenotypic diagnosis: +Middle portion of second circumorbital sensory canal bridge present with more than two sensory openings (character 3, state 3); basisphenoid absent (character 19, state 2); prootic and intercalar in contact (character 20, state 1); lateral lateral-line canal pore on pterotic absent (character 22, state 0); skinny lateral-line sensory canal between pterotic and preopercle present (character 23, state 1); Baudelot’s ligament absent (character 25, state 3); metapterygoid lamina absent (character 32, state 1); rudimentary to no space between metapteryoid and hyomandibula (character 33, state 1); first pharyngobranchial cartilaginous (character 41, state 1); tooth plate on second pharyngobranchial absent (character 42, state 1); dorsal spines slender (character 57, state 1); lower hypural plate and parhypural fused (character 71, state 1); hemal spine and third preural centrum fused (character 72, state 1); hemal spine and second preural centrum fused (character 73, state 1); +levator externus +III absent (character 89, state 1); +levator posterior +absent (character 90, state 1); gill opening wide (character 107, state 1); body lateral line with bony plates (character 109, state 2); spines on lateral-line scales present (character 110, state 1); body scales absent (character 111, state 1). + + +Support statistics: +This family was represented by a single taxon in the analysis, so it does not have bootstrap support values. + + +Systematic comment: +Familial and generic composition and species recognition follow +Eschmeyer +et al. (2017). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/AB/10/E0/AB10E025FF8AFFCFC143FB79FB9EF942.xml b/data/AB/10/E0/AB10E025FF8AFFCFC143FB79FB9EF942.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5883442db41 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/AB/10/E0/AB10E025FF8AFFCFC143FB79FB9EF942.xml @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@ + + + +Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Flatheads, Scorpionfishes, Sea Robins, and Stonefishes (Percomorpha: Scorpaeniformes) and the Evolution of the Lachrymal Saber + + + +Author + +Smith, W. Leo + + + +Author + +Everman, Elizabeth + + + +Author + +Richardson, Clara + +text + + +Copeia + + +2018 + +2018-02-15 + + +106 + + +1 + + +94 +119 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1643/cg-17-669 + +journal article +10.1643/CG-17-669 +2766-1520 +13230683 + + + + + + +Bembridae Kaup, 1873 + + + + + + + +Type +genus: + + +Bembras +Cuvier + +in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1829 + + +Sister taxon: +Neosebastidae +þ +Plectrogeniidae +þ +Scorpaenidae +þ +Synanceiidae + + +Concept and content: +Nine species classified in four genera: + +Bambradon +, +Bembras +, +Brachybembras +, + +and + +Parabembras + + + +Phenotypic diagnosis: +First and second hypurals are separated (character 68, state 0). + + +Support statistics: +The bootstrap support for this clade was 0.70. + + +Systematic comment: +This revised +Bembridae +includes the recently recognized +Parabembridae +because our phylogeny and previous work (e.g., Near et al., 2013) have resolved these two families as a single clade. We retain + +Bambradon + +and + +Brachybembras + +in +Bembridae +following +Eschmeyer +et al. (2017). Additional work on their placement is warranted. Generic composition and species recognition follow +Eschmeyer +et al. (2017). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/AB/10/E0/AB10E025FF8AFFCFC143FDABFA6BFBDC.xml b/data/AB/10/E0/AB10E025FF8AFFCFC143FDABFA6BFBDC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7a27d4cf338 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/AB/10/E0/AB10E025FF8AFFCFC143FDABFA6BFBDC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@ + + + +Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Flatheads, Scorpionfishes, Sea Robins, and Stonefishes (Percomorpha: Scorpaeniformes) and the Evolution of the Lachrymal Saber + + + +Author + +Smith, W. Leo + + + +Author + +Everman, Elizabeth + + + +Author + +Richardson, Clara + +text + + +Copeia + + +2018 + +2018-02-15 + + +106 + + +1 + + +94 +119 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1643/cg-17-669 + +journal article +10.1643/CG-17-669 +2766-1520 +13230683 + + + + + + +Congiopodidae Gill, 1889 + + + + + + + +Type +genus: + + +Congiopodus +Perry, 1811 + + + +Sister taxon: +Cottoidei +þ +Zoarcoidei + + +Concept and content: +Eight species classified in three genera: + +Alertichthys +, +Congiopodus +, + +and + +Zanclorhynchus + + + +Phenotypic diagnosis: +Loss of fourth or fifth circumorbital (character 5, state 2); loss of fourth circumorbital (character 9, state 1); interacalar and posttemporal sutured together (character 21, state 1); lateral lateral-line canal pore on pterotic absent (character 22, state 0); Baudelot’s ligament absent (character 25, state 3); palatine and ectopterygoid separated (character 29, state 1); teeth on palatine absent (character 30, state 1); uroneural absent (character 76, state 1); two epurals (character 77, state 1); +levator posterior +absent (character 90, state 1); gill membranes broadly fused with isthmus, gill opening narrow (character 107, state 2); body lateral line with tube-like bones (character 109, state 1). + + +Support statistics: +The bootstrap support for this clade was 1.00. + + +Systematic comment: +Familial and generic composition and species recognition follow +Eschmeyer +et al. (2017). + + + + \ No newline at end of file