diff --git a/data/03/A2/E7/03A2E731F016FF88FCBF79EAFC359F88.xml b/data/03/A2/E7/03A2E731F016FF88FCBF79EAFC359F88.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..23cb2ce578e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/A2/E7/03A2E731F016FF88FCBF79EAFC359F88.xml @@ -0,0 +1,372 @@ + + + +Gomphomacromia signata sp. n. from the Andes Mountains in Ecuador (Odonata: Synthemistidae) + + + +Author + +Tennessen, Kenneth J. + +text + + +International Journal of Odonatology + + +2024 + +2024-01-25 + + +27 + + +19 +25 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.48156/1388.2024.1917256 + +journal article +10.48156/1388.2024.1917256 +2159-6719 +15555034 + + + + + + +Gomphomacromia signata + +sp. n. +Tennessen + + + + + + + +( +Figures 1–6 +, +9 +, +10 +) + + +Etymology + + +Name formed from the Latin ‘ +signum’ +(adj., bearing marks, signs, or flags), referring collectively to the yel- low spots on the frons, the isolated oval yellow spot on the anterolateral part of the mesepimeron and the forked metepisternal and metepimeral yellow stripes, a unique combination within the genus. + + + +Holotype + +♂ + + +Ecuador +, +Napo Province +, hillside seep along Hwy. E20, about +5.5 km +E of Papallacta in a straight line ( +0.37436 S +, +78.07705 W +, +2716 m +a.s.l.), +5 November 2013 +, K. J. Ten- nessen leg. Deposited in Florida State Collection of Ar- thropods. + + + +Figure 1. + +Gomphomacromia signata + +sp. n. +, holotype male. + + + + +Figure 2. + +Gomphomacromia signata + +sp. n. +, holotype male, showing living eye color and postfrons pattern in anterior view. + + + + +Figure 3. + +Gomphomacromia signata + +sp. n. +, holotype male accessory genitalia, ventral view. + + + + +Description of +holotype +male + + + +A dark brown medium-sized dragonfly with yellow markings on the postfrons, thorax and abdomen ( +Fig. 1 +). + + +Head. Eyes in life green dorsally, brown anteriorly and laterally, pale gray ventrally ( +Fig. 2 +); labrum orange-tan, clypeus and antefrons dark brown, postfrons mostly yel- low with brown medially, vertex brown; labium mostly tan, darker distally; mandibles and maxillae orange-tan; rear of head orange-brown. + + +Thorax. Total surface closely beset with long dark setae. Prothorax brown, middle lobe light brown. Pterothorax: middorsal carina narrowly yellow, mesepisternum dark brown but with a small, narrow anterior and posterior yellow spot ( +Fig. 2 +); mesepimeron dark brown with a large oval yellow spot on anteroventral (lower) portion; metepisternum brown with a wide yellow stripe, narrow ventrally, widening dorsally and forked at upper end, the dorsal prong short, blunt and extending upward onto mesepisternum; metepimeron brown with a yel- low rectangular stripe with an upper extension ( +Fig. 1 +); mesinfraepisternum and metinfraepimeron brown; venter of pterothorax gray-brown. Legs varying shades of medium to dark brown, coxae partly yellow, femora yellow at bases, darker apically; keel on prothoracic tibia extending along distal 0.57 of tibia; metathoracic femur +4.7 mm +long, metathoracic tibia +5.1 mm +long. + + +Wings. Hyaline, venation brown; dark brown spot in basal cells between costa,subcosta and RA;yellow wash in subcostal space ( +Fig. 1 +); triangles free; hw anal loop 5-celled; fw Ax 9, hw Ax 6; fw Px 8, hw Px 9; pterostigma orange-brown, surmounting 1.6 to 1.9 cells. + + +Abdomen. Color pattern dark brown, paler laterally, dorsum with yellow spots: S1 with a posteromedial yel- low spot; S2 with a pair of anterolateral yellow spots and another pair of submedial yellow spots just past midlength; S3–7 with a pair of submedial yellow spots divided by dark transverse carina, anterior part of yel- low spot larger than posterior part, the spots largest on S3 & S4, diminished in size on S5 & S6, very small on S7; S8 with pair of large, round submedial yellow spots; S9 & 10 dark brown ( +Fig. 1 +); posteroventral corner of S1 tergum broadly curved, lacking denticulate process; auricles brown, prominent, 6–8 black denticles on pos- terior margin; S10 deeper than S +9 in +lateral view ( +Fig. 5 +). Anterior hamule laminate with a square notch; pos- terior hamule in ventral view slightly curved, a very short, blunt process at midlength directed medially and a longer, darker, rounded, denticulate distal lobe +0.45 mm +long ( +Figs 3 +, +9 +). Anal appendages dark brown, with many dark setae; cercus in dorsal view nearly straight, apical fourth angled inward so that the pair converges distally, tips narrowed ( +Fig. 4 +), in lateral view slightly arched, ventrolateral margin with a minute sharplytipped denticle at 3/10 length ( +Fig. 5 +); epiproct about 0.7 times length of cerci, in dorsal view of the appendages with tips visible beyond lateral margins of cerci ( +Fig. 4 +) in normal repose, in ventral view as wide distally as ba- sally, with lateral margins slightly incurved, distal mar- gin sinuous, tips protruding posterolaterally ( +Fig. 6 +), in lateral view tips recurved, tooth-like ( +Fig. 5 +). + +Measurements (mm). Total L 39.4, head W 5.3, hind wing L 26.3, abdomen L (excluding cercus) 26.9, cercus L 1.7, pt L 1.67–1.8. + +Female + + +A female of the new species was photographed by Cary Kerst at the same location and on the same day that I collected the male ( +Fig. 7 +); it was not collected. The image shows that the color pattern is similar to that of the male +holotype +, although the eyes have only slight greenish reflections dorsally, the yellow spots on S2–7 + + +6 + + + +Figure 4–6. + +Gomphomacromia signata + +sp. n. +, holotype male, anal appendages in dorsal, lateral and ventral views; arrow in Figure 5 indicates minute ventrolateral denticle on cercus. + + + +are larger and S8 is totally brown. The yellow spots on the postfrons and large yellow spot on the lower mesepimeron are evident in the photograph (females of + +G. fallax + +have a completely dark postfrons and mesepimeron, and the paired yellow spots on the abdomen are smaller than in + +G. signata + +). The tip of the abdomen of + +G. signata + +as shown in dorsolateral view in the pho- tograph ( +Fig. 7 +), does not allow a definitive view of the vulvar lamina. However, the lobes of the vulvar lamina appear to be short, possibly much shorter than in +G. fal- lax +(see +Fig. 2i +in +von Ellenrieder & Garrison, 2005 +). + + +Diagnosis + + + +Gomphomacromia fallax + +is a darker species than +G. sig- nata +, lacking yellow on the postfrons and having less yellow on the thorax and abdomen. In particular, the thoracic pattern of + +G. fallax + +differs in lacking an oval yel- low spot on the lower part of the mesepimeron and the metepisternal and metepimeral stripes are unforked. The abdominal pattern of + +G. fallax + +is similar to that of + +G. signata + +, although the submedial yellow spots are much smaller ( +Fig. 8 +). + + +In + +G. signata + +, small dark brown spots are present in the base of all four wings and there is a yellow wash in the rows of cells between the costa and vein RA ( +Fig. 1 +); the wings bases and anterior rows of cells in males of + +G. fallax + +are clear ( +Fig. 8 +). + + +The distal lobe of the posterior hamule is longer in + +G. signata + +( +0.45 mm +) compared to + +G. fallax + +( +0.25– 0.32 mm +, n = 9 from +Ecuador +and +Bolivia +) ( +Fig. 9 +). The anterior hamule of the + +G. signata + +holotype +has a square notch whereas the notch in + +G. fallax + +is usually much less conspicuous ( +Fig. 10 +), but at least +one specimen +of + +G. fallax + +from +Ecuador +had a square notch. The epiproct is rectangular in + +G. signata + +compared to elongate and tapered in + +G. fallax + +(see +von Ellenrieder & Garrison, 2005 +). Epiproct shape in + +G. signata + +resembles that of + +G. nodisticta + +. + + + +Figure 7. + +Gomphomacromia signata + +sp. n. +, female, +in situ +. Photo: Cary Kerst. + + + + +Figure 8. + +Gomphomacromia fallax + +, male, Imbabura Province, Ecuador. Photo: KJT. + + + +The length of the keel on the prothoracic tibia ex- ceeds half the length of the tibia in + +G. signata + +(0.57) and + +G. fallax + +(0.50–0.66); the keel is shorter (0.33–0.50 length of tibia) in the southern species, + +G. chilensis + +, + +G. nodisticta + +and + +G. paradoxa + +(von Ellenrieder & Gar- rison, 2005). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/B5/87/03B587DEFFD8FFAFFC89FC78B002223F.xml b/data/03/B5/87/03B587DEFFD8FFAFFC89FC78B002223F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6d5e4a7f57f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/B5/87/03B587DEFFD8FFAFFC89FC78B002223F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1185 @@ + + + +A collecting trip to San José del Guaviare, Colombia, with the description of a new species of Perissolestes (Zygoptera: Perilestidae) + + + +Author + +Florez, Tatiana +Laboratorio de Zoología y Ecología Acuática (LAZOEA), Departamentos de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá 111711, Colombia + + + +Author + +Comoglio, Lorenzo +Laboratorio de Zoología y Ecología Acuática (LAZOEA), Departamentos de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá 111711, Colombia + + + +Author + +Pinzón, Tomás +Museo de Historia Natural C. J. Marinkelle, Vicerrectoría de Investigación y Creación, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá 111711, Colombia + + + +Author + +Bota-Sierra, Cornelio A. +Alabama Museum of Natural History & UA Museums Department of Research and Collections, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA & - 4677 - 81 B & Grupo de Entomología Universidad de Antioquia (GEUA), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin 50010, Colombia + + + +Author + +Cano-Cobos, Yiselle +Laboratorio de Zoología y Ecología Acuática (LAZOEA), Departamentos de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá 111711, Colombia & Laboratorio de Biodiversidad y Genética Ambiental (BioGeA), Universidad Nacional de Avellaneda, Piñeyro 1870, Avellaneda, Buenos Aires, Argentina + +text + + +International Journal of Odonatology + + +2023 + +2023-01-12 + + +26 + + +7 +17 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.48156/1388.2023.1917193 + +journal article +10.48156/1388.2023.1917193 +2159-6719 +15554979 + + + + + + + +Perissolestes rupestris +Florez, Bota-Sierra & Cano-Cobos + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +Etymology + + +Latin + +rupestris + +, masculine, third-declension two-termination adjective derived from +rupes +. The species name means that lives on cliffs or rocks and refers to the rock walls that rise on the sides of the small stream where the +type +material was collected ( +Fig. 2f +). It is also a tribute to the pre-Columbian cultures of the area whose legacy survives in the form of rock paintings at the +type +locality ( +Fig. 3 +). + + + + +Material examined + + +9 males +, +2 females + + + +Holotype + + + + +Colombia +, +Guaviare Department +, +San José +del +Guaviare +Municipality +, +Nuevo +Tolima Township +, stream near +Painted Rocks Trail +, +2.463967° N +, +72.753700° W +, + +270 m +a.s.l. + +, + +23-03-2022 + +, +L. Comoglio +leg ( +ANDES-E 28363 +). + +Allotype + +: +Same +as +holotype +but +Y. Cano +leg ( +ANDES-E 28361 +). + + + + +Paratypes + + + + +3 males +, same data as holotype but +Y. Cano +leg (ANDES- +E 28364 +) + +; + +T. Florez +leg ( +ANDES-E 28362 +); +T. Florez +leg ( +ANDES-E 28358 +) + +. + +3 males +, +Casanare Department +, +Tauramena Municipality +, +Visinaca Township +, stream in forest, +5.12745° N +, +72.76492° W +, + +820 m +a.s.l. + +, + +07-11-2017 + +, +C. Bota +leg ( +CEUA 119389 +) + +. + +1 male +and +1 female +, +Agua Azul Municipality +, +Las Brisas Township +, stream in forest, +5.29258° N +, +72.54315° W +, + +580 m +a.s.l. + +, + +08-11-2017 + +, +C. Bota +leg ( +CEUA 119468 +) + +. + + + +Table 1. +List of the +Odonata +collected during the field trip. * New record for Colombia. ºSpecies captured with the aid of the light trap. + Species previously recorded from Guaviare. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Family + +Species + +Localities + +Collected specimens +
+Lestidae + + +Lestes curvatus +Belle, 1997 + +11♂, 1♀
+Perilestidae + + + +Perissolestes rupestris + +sp. nov. + +55♂, 2♀
+Platystictidae + + +Palaemnema sp. + +41♂
+Heteragrionidae + + +Heteragrion bariai +De Marmels, 1989 + +4,59♂, 1♀
+ +Heteragrion breweri +De Marmels, 1989 + +4,53♂
+ +Heteragrion inca +Calvert, 1909 + +51♀
+Calopterygidae + + +Hetaerina caja +(Drury, 1773) + +3,57♂, 2♀
+ +Hetaerina charca +Calvert, 1909 + +31♂
+ +Hetaerina sanguinea +Selys, 1853 + +31♂
+ +Hetaerina westfalli +Rácenis, 1968 + +31♂
+ +Mnesarete metallica +(Selys, 1869) + +41♂
+Coenagrionidae + + +Acanthagrion apicale +Selys, 1876 + +2,45♂, 1♀
+ +Acanthagrion ascendens +Calvert, 1909 + +1,2,326♂
+ +Acanthagrion cuyabae +Calvert, 1909 + +22♂, 1♀
+ +Acanthagrion minutum +Leonard, 1977 + +22♂
+ +Argia collata +Selys, 1865 + +41♂
+ +Argia oculata +Hagen + +in Selys, 1865 +4,55♂
+ +Epipleoneura metallica +Rácenis, 1955 + +49♂
+ +Epipleoneura venezuelensis +Rácenis, 1955 + +510♂, 1♀
+ +Homeoura obrieni +(von Ellenrieder, 2008) + +21♂
+ +Neoneura rufithorax +(Selys, 1886) + +11♂
+ +Protoneura tenuis +Selys, 1860 + +41♂
+ +Telebasis griffinii +(Martin, 1896) + +24♂
+Aeshnidae + + +Anax concolor +Brauer, 1865 + +º +13♀
+ +Coryphaeschna adnexa +(Hagen, 1861) + +º +11♂
+ +Gynacantha membranalis +Karsch, 1891 + +º +11♀
+ +Gynacantha mexicana +Selys, 1868 + +º +11♂
+ +Triacanthagyna ditzleri +Williamson, 1923 + +º +11♂
+Libellulidae + + +Anatya guttata +(Erichson, 1848) + +º +13♂, 3♀
+ +Diastatops intensa +Montgomery, 1940 + +24♂
+ +Erythemis haematogastra +(Burmeister,1839) + +º+ +11♂
+ +Erythemis peruviana +(Rambur, 1842) + +21♂
+ +Erythrodiplax attenuata +(Kirby, 1889) + +1,31♂, 1♀
+ +Erythrodiplax basalis +(Kirby, 1887) + +1,22♂, 1♀
+ +Erythrodiplax fusca +(Rambur, 1842) + +º +11♀
+ +Erythrodiplax tenuis +Borror, 1942 + +º* +1,25♂, 7♀
+ +Erythrodiplax unimaculata +(De Geer, 1773) + +º +1,2,38♂, 12♀
+ +Fylgia amazonica +Kirby, 1889 + +32♂
+ +Miathyria simplex +(Rambur, 1842) + +21♀
+ +Micrathyria dido +Ris, 1911 + +31♂
+ +Micrathyria spinifera +Calvert, 1909 + +* +11♂
+ +Orthemis attenuata +(Erichson, 1848) + +º +11♀
+ +Perithemis lais +(Perty, 1834) + +21♂
+ +Perithemis rubita +Dunkle, 1982 + +* +11♂
+ +Tramea darwini +Kirby, 1889 + +º +11♀
+ +Uracis fastigiata +(Burmeister, 1839) + +1,31♂, 3♀
+ +Uracis imbuta +(Burmeister, 1839) + ++ +1,33♂, 3♀
+ +Uracis infumata +(Rambur, 1842) + +41♂
+ + + +Male +holotype + + + +Head. Labium, labrum, and base of mandibles dark yellow, basal half of genae with metallic green reflections, antennal socket dark brown, basal half of pedicel light brown, apical half of pedicel and flagellum dark brown. Clypeus, frons, and upper part of head with metallic green reflections. Eyes green in life ( +Figs 4a–b +). Postocular area dark, and the rear of the head iridescent black. Frons rounded. Postocular lobes at the level of the hind margins of the compound eyes ( +Figs 5a, f +). + + +Thorax. Prothorax ( +Fig. 5f +) brown with a yellow lateral stripe, anterior lobe and propleuron black, and posterior lobe lighter brown, posterior prothoracic lobe rounded. Pterothorax brown, middorsal carina, antehumeral stripe, metepisternal stripe, metepimeron, and venter pale yellow ( +Figs 4a–b +, +5a +). Coxae pale yellow, leg armature brown, nodus dark brown. Spurs gradually increase in size towards the apex of the femur and towards the base of tibia except for the protibia in which the apical third bear tibial combs on the external sides + + +( +Fig. 5i +). + + +Wings. Hyaline. Pt dark brown, surmounting two cells in all wings ( +Fig. 5a +). Px = +16 in +Fw, +16 in +lef – +15 in +right Hw. RP2 arising at = 9 +th +Px in Fw, 9 +th +Px in lef and 8 +th +Px in right Hw. IRP1 arising at the 13 +th +Px in all wings. Cells below CuA = +16 in +Fw, +13 in +lef – +15 in +right Hw. + + +Abdomen. Dark brown, S1–2 with pale yellow lateral stripe and a black ring at the ends of segments; pale yellow basal ring in S3–7, pale area in the anterior fourth in S4–7, S4–6 with brown on the posterior ¾; S8– 10 black, venter and cercus pale yellow ( +Figs 3a–b +, +4a +). Genital ligula apical portion broad and not elongated (undeveloped), with convex apex ( + +Figs +5g +–h + +). + + +Caudal appendages. Cercus in dorsal view with an internal subbasal tooth perpendicularly directed at 1/4 of the length, there is a medial convex lobe and a roughly triangular subapical lobe; apices incurving with round- ed tips and slightly thickened ( +Fig. 5b +), in lateral view the cercus apical third curves upward ( +Figs 5d–e +). Paraprocts undeveloped, with a pale coloration. + + + +Figure 3 +. Rock paintings that inspired the name of the new species, at Nuevo Tolima Township, San José del Guaviare. Photo by YC-C. + + +Measurements (length in mm): Fw = 25; Hw = 24; abdomen = 47; total = 55. + + +Allotype + + + +Similar to the +holotype +, except as follows: + + +Head. Labrum and base of mandibles light brown, basal half of genae yellow ( +Figs 6a, c +). + + +Thorax. Anterior and posterior lobes of prothorax paler brown ( +Figs 6a, c +). Mesostigmal plates ridged and concave ( +Figs 6b–c +). Interesternite elongated with dorsal apex rounded ( +Fig. 6d +). + + +Wings. Px = +16 in +lef Fw, +17 in +right Fw, +16 in +lef, +15 in +right Hw. RP2 arising at 9 +th +Px in lef Fw, at 10 +th +Px in right Fw, and at 9 +th +Px in Hw. IRP1 arising at 13 +th +Px in lef Fw, at 15 Px in right Fw, and at 13 +th +Px in Hw. Cells below CuA = +16 in +lef Fw, +18 in +right Fw, +15 in +lef and +17 in +right Hw. + + +Abdomen. Paler and dark brown on S9–10. S9 with large, oval pale lateral spot ( +Fig. 6a +). Genital valves black; stylus pale, place of attachment of vulvar stylus ventral to the cercus ( +Fig. 6e +). Cercus dark brown and conical. Paraproct blackish yellow and rounded. + +Measurements (lengths in mm): Fw = 26; Hw = 24; abdomen = 44; total = 54. + + + + +Variation in +paratypes + + + +Males. Coloration paler in the abdomen and legs of +Casanare +specimens. Internal subbasal tooth of cerci directed laterodistally ( +Fig. 5c +). In some cases, wings with dark brown Pt surmounting one and a half to three cells in Fw, although these are close in size to the +holotype +. Px in Fw 13–19, Px in Hw 12–17; RP2 arising at 8–11 +th +Px in Fw and at 8–10 +th +in Hw; IRP1 arising at 12–16 +th +Px in Fw and at 12–15 +th +Px in Hw; cells behind CuA in Fw 16–19 and in Hw 15–18. + +Measurements (lengths in mm): FW = 25–26; HW = 24– 25; abdomen = 47–50; total = 55–60. + +Female. Basal half of genae and ventral half of rear of head iridescent black. Px = +15 in +Fw, +14 in +Hw; RP2 arising at 9 +th +Px in Fw and at 8 +th +in Hw; IRP1 arising at 13 +th +Px in Fw and at 11 +th +Px in Hw. + +Measurements (lengths in mm): FW = 27; HW = 25; abdomen = 43; total = 52. + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Figure 4 +. Habitus of a male + +Perissolestes rupestris + +sp. nov. +in Tauramena Casanare hanging with the abdomen bent dorsally (a), perching with closed wings. b – perched as it usually does with its wings opened. Photos by CAB-S. + + + +The genus + +Perissolestes + +was introduced by Kennedy (1941) based on wing venation, and it currently includes 11 species that range from the Amazon in +Peru +and +Brazil +and the Guiana Shield in eastern South America to southern +Mexico +( +Garrison et al., 2010 +). The males of this genus can be divided into two morphogroups: one with a well-developed internal subbasal tooth in the basal fourth of the cercus ( +Figs 5b–c +), in which we include + +P. rupestris + +together with + +P. klugi +Kennedy, 1941 + +, + +P. paprzyckii +Kennedy, 1941 + +, and + +P. remotus +( +Williamson & Williamson, 1924 +) + +; the other group lacks the internal subbasal tooth or it is located close to the middle of the cercus. + +P. rupestris + +can be differentiated from + +P. klugi + +by the preapical process in + +P. klugi + +being not developed. + +P. rupestris + +can be differentiated from + +P. paprzyckii + +and + +P. remotus + +in dorsal view, by its medial convex lobe in the cercus afer the subbasal tooth ( +Figs 5b–c +) whereas in the other species the internal side of the cercus afer the internal basal tooth is concave. Although the genital ligula is not well developed it is similar to what is seen in + +P. klugi + +and + +P. parzyckii + +where the convex apical lobe is larger ( + +Figs +5g +–h + +) compared to + +P. remotus +. + + + + +Figure 5. +Male holotype (a, b, d); c, e–i – paratype from Casanare Department: Tauramena. a – Habitus; b, c – cerci in dorsal view; d, e – cercus in lateral view; f – head and prothorax in dorsal and lateral views. Ligula in dorsal (g) and lateral (h) views. i – Legs with tibial combs. i s-t – internal subbasal tooth; m l – medial lobe; sa l – subapical lobe; s s – specialized spines. + + + + +Figure 6. +Female allotype. a – Habitus; b – prothorax and mesostigmal plates in dorsal view; c – head and prothorax in dorsal and lateral views, respectively; d – intersternite in lateral view; e – S8–10 in lateral view. + + + +Females of + +P. flinti +De Marmels, 1988 + +and + +P. remus +Kennedy, 1941 + +are unknown. +Kennedy (1941a) +used some structural characters, but mostly coloration, to key out females in this genus. However, the lack of an erect median spine in the hind lobe of the prothorax ( +Figs 6b–c +), and the point of attachment of vulvar styles ventral to the cerci ( +Fig. 6e +) will group + +P. rupestris + +females with + +P. guianensis +( +Williamson & Williamson, 1924 +) + +and + +P. castor +( +Kennedy, 1937 +) + +. At the current state of knowledge, it is hard to separate these +three female +species. A detailed study of other structural characters, such as the intersternites, that have underscored their importance in distinguishing females in other groups where cercus morphology is similar to + +Perissolestes +, + +such as + +Heteragrion +( +Stand-Pérez et al., 2019 +) + +or + +Hetaerina +( +Garrison, 1990 +) + +, is needed to help diagnosing the females of this genus. + + + + +Biology + + + +Perissolestes rupestris + +sp. nov. +was observed on a clear-water creek and streams with rocky beds, perched on vines hanging close to stone walls and on the riparian vegetation. It usually hangs with the abdomen bent dorsally from S7 to S10 with the wings opened to around 100° ( +Fig. 4b +), but may also sometimes hang with the wings closed ( +Fig. 4a +). + + + + +Distribution and conservation + + +Three localities are known for this new species, all of them in eastern +Colombia +, two in the foothills of the Cordillera Oriental (Colombian Eastern Andean Range), in the department of +Casanare +between 580 and +820 m +a.s.l., and one +296 km +to the southeast, in the Amazonian foothills at +270 m +a.s.l. in the department of +Guaviare +( +Fig. 1a +). None of these three locations lies inside a protected area. The rapid expansion of agriculture in this region during recent years may lead to the transformation of these localities and probably result in its extinction, therefore we consider it a threatened species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/CE/A7/03CEA72AFF930D1AEE367646117B993A.xml b/data/03/CE/A7/03CEA72AFF930D1AEE367646117B993A.xml index a059df0d1be..7a1805f6691 100644 --- a/data/03/CE/A7/03CEA72AFF930D1AEE367646117B993A.xml +++ b/data/03/CE/A7/03CEA72AFF930D1AEE367646117B993A.xml @@ -1,41 +1,42 @@ - - - -Platygomphus benritarum sp. nov. and rediscovery of Anormogomphus heteropterus Selys, 1854 (Odonata: Anisoptera: Gomphidae) from Tezpur, Assam, India + + + +Platygomphus benritarum sp. nov. and rediscovery of Anormogomphus heteropterus Selys, 1854 (Odonata: Anisoptera: Gomphidae) from Tezpur, Assam, India - - -Author + + +Author -Joshi, Shantanu -Research Collections, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Bangalore, India; Email: odonataofindia @ gmail. com & Southern Regional Centre, Zoological Survey of India, Chennai 600028, India -odonataofindia@gmail.com +Joshi, Shantanu +Research Collections, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Bangalore, India; Email: odonataofindia @ gmail. com & Southern Regional Centre, Zoological Survey of India, Chennai 600028, India +odonataofindia@gmail.com -text - - -International Journal of Odonatology +text + + +International Journal of Odonatology - -2022 - -2022-05-24 + +2022 + +2022-05-24 - -25 + +25 - -62 -71 + +62 +71 - -https://doi.org/10.48156/1388.2022.1917172 + +https://doi.org/10.48156/1388.2022.1917172 -journal article -10.48156/1388.2022.1917172 -2159-6719 +journal article +10.48156/1388.2022.1917172 +2159-6719 +15554896 @@ -52,7 +53,7 @@ -Figs 1–2 +Figs 1–2 @@ -96,18 +97,18 @@ leg. Head ( -Fig. 1a +Fig. 1a ). Eyes pale brown, darker dorsally. Face uniformly yellow,marked as follows: labium light brown- ish, labrum with medial and postclypeus with paired dark yellow markings, and frons slightly greenish. La- brum 2.5 times as wide as long, frons expanded. Ocellar region depressed and black between lateral ocelli and frons. First antennal segment black at the base, remain- der yellow; second antennal segment black at the base, remainder orange-yellow; filament black. Median ocelli wider than lateral ocelli. Vertex and occipital ridge yel- low, black at their boundary. Thorax ( -Figs 1b, d +Figs 1b, d ). Prothorax yellow, with a distinctive black marking, widely expanded on anterior lobe, cen- ter of median lobe with paired yellow spots.Pterothorax yellow, marked with black: anterior portion of mesostig- ma, faint L-shaped markings along dorsal carina, two nail-shaped markings pointing forward on mesepister- num, thin stripe across upper margin of mesepimeron, junction of metepimeron and metepisternum faintly black. Antealar ridge conspicuous, black, and lined with small black spines, junction of dorsal carina forming a small, sharply pointed spine approximately midway be- tween wing base and mesostigma. Legs black, marked with blackish brown: stripes across tibiae, posteriorly, two stripes on femur, fainter on metafemora. Covered with long, black spines across mid-axis; spines on femur small and sparse. Claws black. Wings ( -Figs 1c, e +Figs 1c, e ) hyaline, membrane extended and yellow, pterostigma and costal margin pale brown, pterostigmal brace present. Antenodals (1 st and 4 @@ -122,12 +123,12 @@ throughout, two rows in lef HW near margin. Abdomen ( -Figs 1b, d +Figs 1b, d ). Ground color on S1–2 yellow, S3 to anterior half of S7 bluish-gray,yellow from there. Auricles small, yellow; covered with black spines. Marked black as follow: S1–7 with annules at posterior margin, short on S1, longitudinal paired black markings on S2–6: mark- ings connected to black rings on S3–6, faint black spots on S7–10: near posterior border on S7–8, at anterior margin on S9–10. Dorsal section of S10 extended, lateral margin excavated. S10 is expanded between branches of cerci; a hood-like lamina is present, covering downwardly curved, horn-like, paired structures with black apices. Vesica spermalis ( -Figs 4a–c +Figs 4a–c ). Hamuli yellow. Anterior hamuli thin, long, ending in a shoulder and anteriorly pointed hook, apical spine black. Posterior hamuli long, saddle-shaped, and covered with bristles; anterior mar- gin curved. V 1 rounded, junction of @@ -142,10 +143,10 @@ Vesica spermalis ( Caudal appendages ( -Figs 4d–f +Figs 4d–f ). Cerci extended 1.6 times as far as epiproct. Cerci blade-shaped, darker on inner side, with a small basal spine, lower margin curved slightly inwards. Epiproct fused at base, widely diver- gent, appearing triangular in lateral view, upper margin ridge-like; ending in upwardly pointed black spines. - + Figure 1. @@ -167,24 +168,24 @@ Three different sources have provided illustrations of the caudal appendages of , viz., 1) Selys & Hagen (1858) , 2) unpublished watercolor painting by Severin (see Material and meth- ods for the link), and 3) Fraser (1926; republished in 1934). These three sources do not agree well with each other, and the first two are very schematic, not showing any finer details of the structure. Only Draw- ing 1 ( -Fig. 4a +Fig. 4a ) depicts the structure of cerci accurately. In Drawing 2 ( -Fig. 4b +Fig. 4b ), the basal spine of cerci is not figured at all, whereas in Drawing 3 ( -Fig. 4c +Fig. 4c ) the bas- al spine of cerci seems exaggerated, and the para- procts are very thin and curved sharply upwards. In the holotype male, the cerci are broken, which might explain the discrepancy in the illustrations by Selys, es- pecially with regard to the first two of the three illustra- tions mentioned above. The third drawing in -Fig. 4 +Fig. 4 a-iii seems to be showing the broken appendages of the holotype (compare with -Fig. 3c +Fig. 3c ). The male described in the present study has a peculiar structure at the base of the caudal appendages (highlighted with an arrow in - + Figure 2. @@ -194,7 +195,7 @@ Selys, 1854 . Male (IBC-BO403). Hamuli: (a) lateral, (b) ventral, (c) lateral view of hamuli; caudal appendages: (d) posterior, (e) lateral, and (f) dorsal views [scale bar = 0.5 mm]. - + Figure 3. @@ -230,7 +231,7 @@ also has a much more westerly distribution with no known records from east of Ka India . - + Figure 4. @@ -241,11 +242,11 @@ Selys, 1854 -Fig. 2d +Fig. 2d ), made up of two lobes with black apices. These structures appear to be sclerotized extensions of the S10, but they were not mentioned in any description or considered in any illustration of this species. From the examination of the type specimen it is clear that they are present (pointed out with an arrow in -Fig. 3d +Fig. 3d ). Ad- ditionally, in Fraser (1926, p. 735), the figure for A. kiritshenkoi @@ -284,15 +285,15 @@ Selys, 1854 Selys, 1854 . From these genera it is differentiated by: (a) single-celled anal tri- angle ( -Fig. 1c +Fig. 1c ), (b) base of HW rounded (not excavated; -Fig. 1c +Fig. 1c ), (c) lateral margin of S10 curved ( -Fig. 2e +Fig. 2e ), (d) shape of caudal appendages ( -Figs 2d–f +Figs 2d–f ), and (e) shape of vesica spermalis ( -Figs 2a–c +Figs 2a–c ). This species belongs to the genus Anormogomphus diff --git a/data/03/CE/A7/03CEA72AFF970D17ED62775F106F953B.xml b/data/03/CE/A7/03CEA72AFF970D17ED62775F106F953B.xml index ba5214811f2..8ecaf94a5d7 100644 --- a/data/03/CE/A7/03CEA72AFF970D17ED62775F106F953B.xml +++ b/data/03/CE/A7/03CEA72AFF970D17ED62775F106F953B.xml @@ -1,41 +1,42 @@ - - - -Platygomphus benritarum sp. nov. and rediscovery of Anormogomphus heteropterus Selys, 1854 (Odonata: Anisoptera: Gomphidae) from Tezpur, Assam, India + + + +Platygomphus benritarum sp. nov. and rediscovery of Anormogomphus heteropterus Selys, 1854 (Odonata: Anisoptera: Gomphidae) from Tezpur, Assam, India - - -Author + + +Author -Joshi, Shantanu -Research Collections, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Bangalore, India; Email: odonataofindia @ gmail. com & Southern Regional Centre, Zoological Survey of India, Chennai 600028, India -odonataofindia@gmail.com +Joshi, Shantanu +Research Collections, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Bangalore, India; Email: odonataofindia @ gmail. com & Southern Regional Centre, Zoological Survey of India, Chennai 600028, India +odonataofindia@gmail.com -text - - -International Journal of Odonatology +text + + +International Journal of Odonatology - -2022 - -2022-05-24 + +2022 + +2022-05-24 - -25 + +25 - -62 -71 + +62 +71 - -https://doi.org/10.48156/1388.2022.1917172 + +https://doi.org/10.48156/1388.2022.1917172 -journal article -10.48156/1388.2022.1917172 -2159-6719 +journal article +10.48156/1388.2022.1917172 +2159-6719 +15554896 @@ -53,7 +54,7 @@ Joshi & Mital -Figs 5–6 +Figs 5–6 @@ -109,10 +110,10 @@ male Head ( -Fig. 5a +Fig. 5a ). Eyes turquoise blue. Labium yellow, face dark brown, covered with hairs on the sides, faint yel- low paired spots on labrum, anteclypeus paler brown, large paired blue spots covering almost the entire post- frons, postfrons with brown setae. Blue and brown bands on the first and second segments of antenna, filament black. Labrum 2.3 times as wide as long. Ocel- lar region sky-blue, junction of frons and vertex white, vertex black, occiput pale bluish yellow, occipital ridge black with a yellow spot. - + Figure 5. @@ -122,7 +123,7 @@ Head ( Holotype male (IBC-BO402) (a) head; (b) right FW & HW; (c) lateral habitus (live); (d) dorsal habitus; (e) lateral habitus [scale bar = 5 mm]. - + Figure 6. @@ -134,12 +135,12 @@ Holotype male (IBC-BO402). (a) hamuli lateral; (b) hamuli ventral; (c) caudal ap Thorax ( -Figs 5c–e +Figs 5c–e ). Prothorax yellow with median lobes. Pterothorax black, marked with greenish yellow as fol- lows: mesothoracic collar, dorsally with oval spots, stripe on mesepisternum, laterally broadly yellow with black stripes across sutures. Legs black, profemora internally marked yel- low, covered with black spines; coxae yellow. Ven- ter of thorax and base of legs slightly pruinose. Wings ( -Fig. 5b +Fig. 5b ). Base of wings and membranes yellow. Pterostigma dark brown, pterostigmal brace present. Antenodals (1 st and 5 @@ -150,7 +151,7 @@ and IRP 2 , two rows near margin. - + Figure 7. Type locality of @@ -163,17 +164,17 @@ at the Rudra Padh Temple,Tezpur,Assam, India (Photo: Manisha Kumari). Abdomen ( -Figs 5c–e +Figs 5c–e ). Narrow up to anterior half of S7, S8 expanded, S9–10 tapering. Black marked with yel- low. S1 to base of S3 laterally greenish yellow, S3–7 with basal annules, broken on S3 and extensive on S7. Auricles triangular, pointed. S2–3 with a mediodorsal triangular marking pointing posteriorly, small faint dor- sal spots on S4–5. Markings gradually turning yellowish brown, especially from S7. S9 with paired dorsal mark- ings along lateral margins and a small marking on the posterior border; S10 dark brown. Vesica spermalis ( -Figs 6a, b, d +Figs 6a, b, d ). Genital lobe expanded, brown. Anterior hamuli short, simple, rounded, and covered with setae on apices. Posterior hamuli longer, shaped like a wrench; apical anterior margin notched, apices anteriorly curved, ending in a spine. V2 simple, rounded at edges, ventrally marked white. V3 curved at base, with a ventral beak-like prepuce, broadening on the apices, V4 with protuberances ventrally, saddle-shaped extensions; apical filaments short, apices ante- riorly curved. Caudal appendages ( -Figs 6c, e, f +Figs 6c, e, f ). Black, epiproct brown at base and laterally. Cerci 1.2 times longer than epiproct. Cerci expanded, trilobate; lateral mar- gin forming a sharp spine at base, outer edge serrated, apices ending in two spines. Epiproct slightly divaricate, ending in an upwardly curved spine. Measurements. Abdomen + caudal appendages = 32.9, FW = 32.6, HW = 31. @@ -188,7 +189,7 @@ This species is placed in the genus Platygomphus due to the shape of the male genitalia (ending with di- vergent apical filaments, -Fig. 6d +Fig. 6d ), and anal triangle three-celled and curved along the margin. From P. dolabratus @@ -202,13 +203,13 @@ and P. feae but medial ridge prominent with the two lobes less furcated; -Figs 5e–f +Figs 5e–f ), (b) markings on face (labrum, clypeus, antefrons brown with pale blu- ish frons in P. benritarum vs. face extensively yellow; -Fig. 5a +Fig. 5a ), and (c) shape of apical flagellum of V4 (short and thick, vs. long in P. dolabratus @@ -218,7 +219,7 @@ and P. feae ; -Fig. 5d +Fig. 5d ). Platygomphus benritarum @@ -274,7 +275,7 @@ A single male was found resting on a large Ficus tree sit- uated about 5–6 meters from the banks of Brahmaputra River near the Rudra Padh Temple at around 17.00 h. The habitat along the banks is dominated by grasses, sparse trees, paddy fields, and marshlands along with some forest patches and tree plantations ( -Fig. 7 +Fig. 7 ). Platygomphus diff --git a/data/03/EC/87/03EC87C7FFD2D21EFDD891D97BABFDDA.xml b/data/03/EC/87/03EC87C7FFD2D21EFDD891D97BABFDDA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..61c532b131e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/EC/87/03EC87C7FFD2D21EFDD891D97BABFDDA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,201 @@ + + + +A new species of Pimelodella (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae) from the Paraguai basin, Brazil, with a discussion regarding its distribution + + + +Author + +Pierre, Veida +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zoologia – UnB, Laboratório de Ictiologia Sistemática, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de BrasÍlia, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, 70910 - 900 BrasÍlia, DF, Brazil +veidampierre@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Slobodian, Veronica +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zoologia – UnB, Laboratório de Ictiologia Sistemática, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de BrasÍlia, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, 70910 - 900 BrasÍlia, DF, Brazil. +vslobodian@unb.br + +text + + +Neotropical Ichthyology + + +2024 + +e 230110 + + +2024-04-05 + + +22 + + +1 + + +1 +25 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-2023-0110 + +journal article +10.1590/1982-0224-2023-0110 +1982-0224 +13326463 +153660CD-6BEA-4D7F-AB0F-5B026BDC09FB + + + + + + +Key to the species of +Pimelodella +from the +Paraguai +basin + + + + + + + + + +1a. +Total vertebrae 46 (rarely 45); anal-fin adpressed terminus always anterior to adipose-fin terminus, reaching at least the vertical through three-fourths of adipose fin; adipose fin very long, slightly more than 2.0 to 2.5 times in SL ................................................................................................................. + +P. gracilis + + + + + +1b. +Total vertebrae 39–44; anal-fin adpressed terminus between verticals through adipose-fin terminus and slightly posterior to adipose-fin terminus; adipose fin 2.5 or more times in SL.............................................................................................. 2 + + + + + + +2a. +Openings of preoperculomandibular laterosensory canal at dentary large and conspicuous; posterior margin of pectoral-fin spine bearing 14–20 small, retrorse blades along basal two-thirds ( +Fig. 3C +); head roof heavily ornamented..................................................................................................... + +P. mucosa + + + + + +2b. +Openings of preoperculomandibular laterosensory canal at dentary not large or particularly conspicuous; posterior margin of pectoral-fin spine not as above; head roof ornamentation inconspicuous................................................................... 3 + + + + + + +3a. +Supraoccipital process not reaching the anterior prenuchal plate; dorsal-fin spine small, approximately half or slightly more of second dorsal-fin ray total length; dorsal lobe of caudal fin notably longer than ventral caudal-lobe; hypural 5 variably fused to hypural 3+4...................................................................... + +P. megalura + + + + + +3b. +Supraoccipital process reaching the anterior prenuchal plate; dorsal-fin spine at least a third of second dorsal-fin total ray length (excepting the filamentuous portion, if present); caudal-fin lobes subequal or ventral lobe slightly longer than dorsal; hypural 5 completely free ...................................................................... 4 + + + + + + +4a. +Maxillary barbels always surpassing caudal-fin origin; posterior margin of pectoral-fin spine bearing 4–6 notably triangular, short and straight blades along basal two-thirds; dorsal fin distal third notably dark brown to black........................................................................................................ + +P. notomelas + + + + + +4b. +Maxillary barbels reaching between pelvic-fin origin and may extend beyond caudal-fin origin; posterior margin of the pectoral-fin spine not as above; dorsal fin not presenting a notably dark brown to black coloration ....................... 5 + + + + + + +5a. +Dorsal profile straight from snout to dorsal fin; dorsal-fin spine robust, large, bearing small, straight spinules along three-fourths of its distal posterior margin; posterior margin of pectoral-fin spine bearing 13–23 retrorse blades along basal two-thirds ( +Fig. 3A +) ................................................................................. + +P. guato + + + + + +5b. +Dorsal profile convex from snout to dorsal fin; dorsal-fin spine not particularly robust, nor bearing spinules at its posterior margin; posterior margin of pectoral-fin spine bearing 9–13 retrorse blades along basal two-thirds .................. 6 + + + + + + +6a. +Maxillary barbels reaching at least anal-fin terminus when parallel to main body axis; adipose fin 2.5 to almost 3.0 times in SL .............................. + +P. taeniophora + + + + + +6b. +Maxillary barbels reaching between pelvic-fin origin and anal-fin terminus; adipose fin short, more than 3.5 times in SL............................................................. 7 + + + + + + +7a. +Epiphyseal branch of supraorbital canal on the head (S6) with contralateral canals connecting at midline, proceeding posteriorly as a single canal and opening in a single pore (S6+S6 diaulic pore); total vertebrae 41–42; dorsal region of body usually presenting a well-delimited darker stripe from supraoccipital process to first third of adipose-fin base .......................................................................... + +P. griffini + + + + + +7b. +Epiphyseal branch of supraorbital canal on the head (S6) emerging as two separated pores; total vertebrae 39–40; dorsal region of head and body slightly darkened, with a dark brown mark extending just between dorsal and adipose fins............................................................................................... + +P. laticeps + + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/EC/87/03EC87C7FFDBD21DFCBF91127BB8FE00.xml b/data/03/EC/87/03EC87C7FFDBD21DFCBF91127BB8FE00.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c8f9a876f49 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/EC/87/03EC87C7FFDBD21DFCBF91127BB8FE00.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1489 @@ + + + +A new species of Pimelodella (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae) from the Paraguai basin, Brazil, with a discussion regarding its distribution + + + +Author + +Pierre, Veida +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zoologia – UnB, Laboratório de Ictiologia Sistemática, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de BrasÍlia, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, 70910 - 900 BrasÍlia, DF, Brazil +veidampierre@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Slobodian, Veronica +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zoologia – UnB, Laboratório de Ictiologia Sistemática, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de BrasÍlia, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, 70910 - 900 BrasÍlia, DF, Brazil. +vslobodian@unb.br + +text + + +Neotropical Ichthyology + + +2024 + +e 230110 + + +2024-04-05 + + +22 + + +1 + + +1 +25 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-2023-0110 + +journal article +10.1590/1982-0224-2023-0110 +1982-0224 +13326463 +153660CD-6BEA-4D7F-AB0F-5B026BDC09FB + + + + + + +Pimelodella guato + +, +new species + + + + + + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +E9B6CDE4-ACE0-466B-B97D-A6BB29C8238F + + + +( +Figs. 1 +, +2A +, +3A +; +Tab. 1 +) + + + + + +Pimelodella serrata + +non +Eigenmann, 1917 +. — + +Slobodian +et al. +, 2022:340 + +(rio Taquari, rio +Paraguai +basin; geographic distribution). + + + + + +FIGURE 1 | + +Pimelodella guato + + +, holotype, ZUFMS-PIS 8515, 78.5 mm SL, Brazil, Mato Grosso do Sul, Corumbá municipality, rio Paraguai basin, rio Miranda, sandy beaches at Passo do Lontra region, 19°34’37”S 57°00’42”W. +A. +Dorsal; +B. +Left lateral; and +C. +Ventral views. Scale bar = 1 cm. + + + + + + +Holotype +. + +ZUFMS-PIS 8515 +, xr, +78.5 mm +SL, +Brazil +, +Mato Grosso do Sul +, +Corumbá +municipality, +rio Paraguai +basin, +rio Miranda +, sandy beaches at +Passo do Lontra region +, +19°34’37”S +57°00’42”W +, + +31 Oct 1991 + +, +J. C. Louzan +& +V. M. F. Jesus. + + + + + +Paratypes +. + +All from +Brazil +, +rio Paraguai +basin. +CIUnB +1772 +, +7 +, 3 xr, +79.1–99.9 mm +SL, +1 +c&s, +91.2 mm +SL, +Mato Grosso do Sul +, +Corumbá municipality +, +rio Miranda +, sandy beaches at +Passo do Lontra +region, +19°34’37”S +57°00’42”W +, + +17 Sep 1993 + +, +O. Froehlich. + + +MZUEL 11088 +, + +1 +, 103.7 mm + +SL, +Mato Grosso do Sul +, +Corumbá municipality +, corixo, fifth bridge after the entrance to +Passo do Lontra +, +Estrada Parque +, +19°38’S +57°02’W +, + +3 Sep 2002 + +, +O. A. Shibatta +et al +. + + +MZUEL 16829 +, +1 +, +79.6 mm +SL, +Mato Grosso do Sul +, +Corumbá municipality +, +rio Miranda +, BEP/UFMS ( +Base de Estudos do Pantanal +), +19°34’36”S +57°1’5”W +, + +22 Aug 2016 + +, +O. A. Shibatta +et al +. + + +NUP +14295 +, +1 +, +72.3 mm +SL, +Mato Grosso +, +Cáceres municipality +, baía de +Cáceres +, tributary of +rio Paraguai +, +16°04’02”S +57°41’38”W +, + +28 Mar 2012 + +, +Nupelia. + + +NUP +19919 +, +3 +, +64.8–83.2 mm +SL, +Mato Grosso do Sul +, +Coxim municipality +, +rio Coxim +, tributary of +rio Taquari +, +18°33’32”S +54°44’37”W +, + +8 Oct 2017 + +, +Nupelia. + + +ZUFMS-PIS 647 +, +5 +, xr, +37.1–94.3 mm +SL, +Mato Grosso do Sul +, +Corumbá municipality +, +rio Miranda +, +Passo do Lontra +, across from the BEP, +19°34’37”S +57°00’42”W +, + +6 Sep 1990 + +, +O. Froehlich. + + +ZUFMS-PIS 676 +, +15 +, +62.3–107.4 mm +SL, +Mato Grosso do Sul +, +Corumbá municipality +, +rio Miranda +, sandy beaches at +Passo do Lontra +region, +19°34’37”S +57°00’42”W +, + +17 Sep 1993 + +, +O. Froehlich. + + +ZUFMS-PIS 4843 +, +2 +, xr, +64.6–65.4 mm +SL, +Mato Grosso do Sul +, +Corumbá +municipality, +rio Miranda +, across from the BEP, +19°34’37”S +57°00’42”W +, + +5 Sep 2008 + +, +O. Froehlich. + + +ZUFMS-PIS 6370 +, +2 +, xr, +98.6–127.9 mm +SL, +Mato Grosso do Sul +, +Coxim +municipality, +rio Taquari +, +18°31’32”S +54°44’30”W +, + +16 Dec 2019 + +, +H. Gimenes-Jr +, +M. B. Mendonça +, +P. Camelier +, +M. Kaluza +, +F. Severo-Neto +, +R. Rech +, +F. Vasconcelos +& +R. Mochi +. + + +ZUFMS-PIS 8516 +, +4 +, xr, 49.7–109.0 mm SL, same data as holotype + +. + + + + +Diagnosis. + +Pimelodella guato + +differs from all + +Pimelodella +species + +except + +P. boliviana + +, + +P. chaparae + +, + +P. cristata + +, + +P. cruxenti + +, + +P. dorseyi + +, + +P. geryi + +, + +P. gracilis + +, + +P. howesi + +, + +P. humeralis + +, + +P. laurenti + +, + +P. longibarbata + +, + +P. longipinnis + +, + +P. martinezi + +, + +P. megalops + +, + +P. mucosa + +, + +P. notomelas + +, + +P. odynea + +, + +P. ophthalmica + +, + +P. parnahybae + +, + +P. serrata + +, + +P. steindachneri + +, + +P. taeniophora + +, + +P. tapatapae + +, + +P. wesselii + +, and + +P. witmeri + +by the long maxillary barbel, reaching at least the anal-fin terminus when parallel to main body axis ( +vs +. reaching at best posterior limit of anal-fin base). It differs from + +P. longipinnis + +and + +P. tapatapae + +by having the supraoccipital process reaching the anterior nuchal plate ( +vs. +not reaching, gap between distal terminus of supraoccipital process and anterior nuchal plate +ca +. 20–25% of supraoccipital process length). It differs from + +P. boliviana + +, + +P. cruxenti + +, + +P. geryi + +, + +P. laurenti + +, + +P. martinezi + +, + +P. megalops + +, + +P. notomelas + +, + +P. odynea + +, and + +P. taeniophora + +by having a robust dorsal-fin spine, bearing small, straight spinules along three-fourths of its posterior margin ( +vs. +dorsal-fin spine not particularly robust, with posterior margin spinules inconspicuous or absent). It differs from + +P. cristata + +, + +P. dorseyi + +, + +P. gracilis + +, + +P. howesi + +, + +P. humeralis + +, + +P. ophthalmica + +, + +P. parnahybae + +, + +P. steindachneri + +, + +P. wesselii + +, and + +P. witmeri + +by usually having 41–42 (rarely 43 or 44) total vertebrae ( +vs. +always +43–44 in + +P. howesi +; + +46 or more in the remaining species). It further differs from + +P. howesi + +by having the dorsolateral region of body slightly darkened ( +vs. +not darkened), dorsal fin with light brown stripe near its origin, followed by a hyaline stripe, and distal half dark ( +vs. +basal half of dorsal fin hyaline, and distal half dark), and by the dorsal lamina of the Weberian apparatus reaching the ventral margin of the supraoccipital process only at its first third ( +vs. +dorsal lamina reaching the supraoccipital process along all its extension). It differs from + +P. mucosa + +and + +P. longibarbata + +by the preoperculomandibular laterosensory canal openings at dentary not particularly large ( +vs +. large openings). It differs from + +P. chaparae + +, + +P. longibarbata + +, and + +P. serrata + +by the wide midlateral stripe ( +vs +. narrow) and by the dorsal lamina of the Weberian apparatus reaching the ventral margin of the supraoccipital process only at its first third ( +vs. +first half in + +P. longibarbata + +; and almost its entire extension in + +P. chaparae + +and + +P. serrata + +) ( +Figs. 2A, D +). + + +Furthermore, + +P. guato + +can be diagnosed from all congeners by the following exclusive character combination: dorsal profile straight from snout to dorsal fin; maxillary barbel reaching at least the anal-fin terminus when parallel to main body axis; supraoccipital process reaching anterior nuchal plate; dorsal-fin spine robust, bearing small, straight spinules along three-fourths of its posterior margin; posterior margin of pectoral-fin spine bearing 13–23 large, retrorse blades along basal two-thirds ( +Fig. 3A +); adipose fin 2.5 to 3.0 times in SL; usually 41–42 (rarely 43 or 44) total vertebrae; epiphyseal branch of supraorbital canal on the head (S6) emerging as a single pore; brown midlateral stripe wide, not well delimited, extending from snout to caudal-fin origin. + + + + +FIGURE 2 | +Left lateral view of radiographs of + +Pimelodella +species + +, illustrating the dorsal lamina of Weberian complex vertebrae of + +A. + +Pimelodella guato + + +, paratype, ZUFMS-PIS 647, 90.1 mm SL; +B. + +P. taeniophora +, ZUFMS-PIS + +6320, 68.9 mm SL; + +C. + +P. mucosa + + +, holotype, CAS 63720, 97.4 mm SL; and +D. + +P. serrata +, LIRP + +10022, 83.6 mm SL. + + + + +FIGURE 3 | +Pectoral-fin spine of + +A. + +Pimelodella guato + + +, paratype, CIUnB 1772, 91.2 mm SL, length of spine 16.7 mm; +B. + +P. taeniophora +, ZUFMS-PIS + +6320, 68.9 mm SL, length of spine 11.4 mm; + +C. + +P. mucosa + + +, holotype, CAS 63720, 97.4 mm SL, length of spine 22.8 mm; + +D. + +P. serrata + + +, holotype, FMNH 57979, 55.7 mm SL, length of spine 18.3 mm; and + +E. + +P. howesi + + +, holotype, ANSP 69036, 79.3 mm SL, length of spine 17.8 mm. + + + + +Description. +Morphometric data are summarized in +Tab. 1 +. Body moderately depressed, depth at dorsal-fin origin 5.0 to 6.5 times in SL; and moderately compressed; body width at dorsal-fin origin 7.0 to 9.0 times in SL ( +Fig. 1 +). Greatest body depth at dorsal-fin origin. Dorsal profile straight from snout to dorsal-fin origin, concave from dorsal fin to adipose fin, slightly convex along adipose fin, and concave along caudal peduncle. Ventral profile of body slightly convex from snout to branchiostegal membrane, convex between pectoral and pelvic fins, slightly convex from pelvic fin to anal-fin origin, and concave from this point along the caudal peduncle. + +Pseudotympanum externally visible, large, oval, dorsal to posterior process of cleithrum and reaching vertical line of sixth (16) vertebrae. Posterior process of cleithrum triangular, long, its dorsal border slightly concave. Anus and urogenital papilla adjacent. Urogenital papilla tubular, triangular, short. Anus between verticals through half and last third of adpressed pelvic fin; urogenital papilla between verticals through second third and terminus of adpressed pelvic fin. Some specimens might present enlarged urogenital papillae (see Discussion). + + +TABLE 1 | +Morphometric data for the holotype and 42 paratypes of + +Pimelodella guato + +. N = number of specimens; SD = Standard deviation. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Holotype + +Range + +N + +Mean + +SD +
Total length (mm)97.147.5–161.24299.9
Standard length (mm)78.537.1–127.94382.5
Percents of standard length
Body depth (dorsal)17.615.0–20.84317.91.3
Body width (dorsal)12.011.1–14.14312.90.8
Cleithral width16.015.2–18.24316.70.6
Head length29.227.2–31.34329.01.0
Maxillary-barbel length (left side)87.181.0–113.64294.67.4
Outer mental-barbel length (left side)36.728.7–49.74337.33.9
Inner mental-barbel length (left side)21.216.8–32.34322.03.0
Predorsal length32.328.5–34.14332.31.2
Distance between snout tip and terminus of dorsal-fin base45.442.3–48.94346.21.2
Distance between snout tip and dorsal-fin distal end62.154.4–75.23858.33.4
Dorsal fin to adipose fin5.03.8–22.2437.32.9
Dorsal-fin base15.212.7–18.34314.91.0
Length of first dorsal-fin ray (unbranched)30.520.1–42.52924.84.3
Length of rigid part of first dorsal-fin ray20.414.3–20.73818.51.4
Length of second dorsal-fin ray (first branched)24.018.6–24.04221.31.2
Length of third dorsal-fin ray (second branched)19.316.4–23.34219.41.6
Prepectoral length23.220.0–27.54324.02.0
Distance between snout tip and terminus of pectoral-fin base24.722.5–29.04325.91.7
Distance between snout tip and pectoral-fin distal end43.038.8–46.04242.41.7
Length of first left pectoral-fin ray (unbranched)21.217.3–21.23919.41.1
Length of rigid part of first left pectoral-fin ray18.715.5–18.84317.40.9
Length of second left pectoral-fin ray (first branched)19.214.7–19.94217.61.2
Length of third left pectoral-fin ray (second branched)17.912.4–17.94115.41.2
Prepelvic length42.142.1–49.24345.51.5
Distance between snout tip and terminus of pelvic-fin base43.643.6–50.84347.11.4
Distance between snout tip and pelvic-fin distal end61.358.6–65.54361.41.7
Distance between pelvic fins3.72.7–6.4434.30.8
Length of first left pelvic-fin ray (unbranched)18.111.5–18.14314.81.4
Length of second left pelvic-fin ray (first branched)18.214.3–18.24316.1 +1.0 +
+ + + +TABLE 1 | +(Continued) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Holotype + +Range + +N + +Mean + +SD +
Length of third left pelvic-fin ray (second branched)17.414.0–17.94215.81.0
Anal-fin base10.38.6–12.94310.50.9
Preanal length65.765.1–71.44367.81.4
Distance between snout tip and terminus of anal-fin base76.774.8–82.54377.41.5
Distance between snout tip and anal-fin distal end84.382.0–90.34285.21.7
Adipose-fin length39.132.5–39.44336.41.5
Preadipose length51.651.1–56.44353.21.2
Distance between snout tip and adipose-fin base end86.986.3–91.14388.21.0
Adipose-fin depth4.43.6–5.2424.40.4
Caudal-peduncle length posterior to adipose-fin10.98.1–12.94310.50.9
Caudal-peduncle depth at adipose-fin terminus8.26.5–9.2438.00.5
Snout-anus distance48.648.2–54.44251.01.3
Snout-urogenital papilla distance55.453.2–60.04056.31.5
Anus-urogenital papilla distance6.83.9–9.4405.41.3
Dorsal lobe of caudal fin length23.621.2–29.23925.82.2
Ventral lobe of caudal fin length26.720.8–29.84225.11.9
+Percents of head length +
Head depth48.442.3–63.54351.44.0
Head width48.946.1–57.74351.83.1
Eye diameter (left)19.317.6–25.34320.31.6
Fleshy interorbital28.222.1–28.44324.91.7
Bony interorbital18.012.0–20.54317.21.5
Mouth gape32.027.3–37.24232.22.4
Snout length (left)35.831.2–38.24335.01.5
Distance between snout tip and posterior nare (left side)18.615.6–21.54318.51.3
Anterior internarial width12.19.1–15.34312.01.1
Posterior internarial width12.111.3–15.54313.71.0
Intranarial length (left side)11.910.9–15.44312.80.9
+ + +Head moderately depressed, depth at supraoccipital-process base 1.5 to 2.5 times in HL. Mouth sub-terminal. Eyes elliptical, 4.0 to more than 5.5 times in HL. Bony interorbital distance roughly equal to eye diameter. Barbels thin, slightly depressed, elliptical in cross-section. Maxillary barbel reaching at least the anal-fin terminus when parallel to main body axis. Outer mental barbel, when parallel to main body axis, reaching between second third of adpressed pectoral fin and first third of adpressed pelvic fin. Inner mental barbel, when parallel to main body axis, reaching between pectoral-fin origin and second third of adpressed pectoral-fin. Supraoccipital process subrectangular to triangular, wide. Dorsal lamina of Weberian complex vertebrae moderately deep, usually reaching the ventral margin of the supraoccipital process along its first third ( +Fig. 2A +). Branchiostegal 6(17). + +Dorsal fin triangular, distal margin convex, moderate in length (second branched dorsal-fin ray almost 4.5 to 6.0 times in SL), depressed tip reaching between vertical line through half and terminus of adpressed pelvic fin. Dorsal fin with II,6(24), being the anteriormost the spinelet. Distance between terminus of dorsal-fin base and adipose-fin origin at least a third shorter than dorsal-fin base. Anteriormost dorsal-fin pterygiophore posterior to neural spine of vertebra 4(17); posteriormost dorsal-fin pterygiophore anterior to neural (or pseudoneural) spine of vertebra 10*(7)–12(2). Second unbranched dorsal-fin ray mostly ossified as a spine, long (spine three-fourths of first dorsal-fin ray total length). Dorsal-fin spine robust, bearing small, straight spinules along distal three-fourths of its posterior margin. Second unbranched dorsal-fin ray may present a nonspinuous filamentous portion (see Discussion). + +Pectoral-fin rays I,7(4)–I,9(5) ( +holotype +I,8), pectoral-fin triangular with convex or slightly straight distal margin. First pectoral-fin ray curved, with proximal part rigid, forming a spine, and short distal tip, flexible and distinctly segmented. Pectoral-fin spine long, 5.5 to 6.5 times in SL. Anterior margin of pectoral-fin spine with small, straight spinules along its basal two-thirds and flat spinules along its distal third ( +Fig. 3A +). Posterior margin of pectoral-fin spine bearing 13–23 ( +holotype +17) retrorse blades along basal two-thirds ( +Fig. 3A +). Blades larger and more inclined, hook-like, near distal tip, meanwhile smaller, less inclined, near pectoral-fin base. + +Pelvic-fin rays i,5(23), pelvic fin triangular with convex distal margin when expanded. Pelvic-fin origin at vertical through penultimate branched dorsal-fin ray. Tip of adpressed pelvic fin between verticals through second eighth and second fifth of adipose fin. First unbranched ray distinctly shorter than subequal branched second and third rays; remaining rays progressively shorter. +Anal-fin rays iv,7(6); v,7*(4); iv,8(3); or v,8(2); distal border of expanded anal fin convex. One or two anteriormost anal-fin rays vestigial, unsegmented, embedded in thick skin fold. Anal-fin origin between verticals through second third and half adipose-fin base; adpressed anal-fin terminus between verticals through last eighth and terminus of adipose fin. Anteriormost anal-fin pterygiophore posterior to hemal spine of vertebrae 20(1), 21*(5), 22(7) or 23(4); posteriormost anal-fin pterygiophore anterior to hemal spine of vertebrae 27(2), 28*(9), 29(5) or 30(1). + +Adipose fin 2.5 to 3.0 times in SL, forming ascending elevated curve in lateral profile, with deepest point approximately midlength. Adipose fin emerging gradually, its posterior limit as a rounded, free lobe. Adipose-fin origin usually at vertical through vertebral centra 16*(6)–18(4), rarely 15(1) or 19(1); adipose-fin terminus usually at vertical through vertebral centra 35(2)–37(7) ( +holotype +36), rarely 34(1) or 38(1). + + +Caudal fin deeply forked, lobes subequal, or ventral lobe slightly longer than dorsal. Caudal peduncle length posterior to adipose fin roughly equal to or slightly larger than its depth. Dorsal lobe with 7(18) branched, 1(18) unbranched principal, and 13(2)– 23(1) ( +holotype +17) procurrent fin-rays. Ventral lobe with 7(2)–8*(14) branched, 1(18) unbranched principal, and 14(2)–22(1) (16*) procurrent fin-rays. Hypural 5 completely free, not fused to hypural 3+4. Median caudal-fin rays not articulated directly to caudal plate. Seven* (13) or 8(3) rays articulated to dorsal caudal-fin plate (5 or 6 on hypurals 3+4, and 2 on hypural 5) and 7*(14) or 8(2) rays articulated to ventral caudal-fin plate (5 or 6 on hypurals 1+2, and 2 on parahypural). Total vertebrae usually 41(7)–42*(7), rarely 43(2) or 44(2). Ribs 7*(6)–9(1). + +Epiphyseal branch of supraorbital canal on the head (S6) with contralateral canals connecting at midline, proceeding posteriorly as a single canal and opening in a single pore (diaulic S6+S6 pore). + +Coloration in alcohol. +Background body coloration pale yellow, dorsal and lateral regions of body with sparsely distributed dark brown chromatophores, more concentrated dorsal to midlateral stripe. Ventral region of body and head lacking pigmentation. Brown midlateral stripe wide, faint, not well-delimited, extending from snout to eye and posterior to eye onto the caudal-fin origin. Dorsal region of body with slightly more concentrated brown chromatophores from dorsal-fin origin to half adipose-fin base, fading posteriorly. Pseudotympanum area darker than surrounding areas. Dorsal region of head with scattered dark brown chromatophores. Cephalic brown pigment at posterior fontanel region. Paired dorsal dark-brown stripes, weakly delimited, extending along supraoccipital process. Maxillary barbel dorsal surface brown; mental barbels weakly pigmented along their dorsal surfaces. Dorsal fin with scattered brown chromatophores, more heavily pigmented at the dorsal-fin spine. Dorsal fin with light brown stripe near its base, followed by a hyaline stripe, and distal half darkened. Pectoral-fin spine and branched rays with scattered chromatophores along their extension. Pelvic, anal and caudal fins almost hyaline, with sparse brown chromatophores along rays. Adipose fin hyaline. + + + + +Geographical distribution. + +Pimelodella guato + +is known from the rio +Paraguai +basin, which includes all rivers where the new species was sampled, +i.e. +the rio Miranda, rio Coxim, rio Taquari, and rio +Paraguai +itself ( +Fig. 4 +). The rio Miranda drains from Mato Grosso do Sul State, ultimately joining the rio +Paraguai +on its left bank within the municipality of Corumbá. Moreover, the rio Miranda basin interconnects with the northwest region of the rio Taquari basin ( + +Mendes +et al. +, 2004 + +). The rio Taquari originates in the highlands of +Mato Grosso State +and courses into +Mato Grosso do Sul +, in +Brazil +( + +Galdino +et al +., 2003 + +). In the latter State, the rio Taquari flows east-towest, with the rio Coxim serving as its primary tributary before its confluence with rio +Paraguai +on its left bank ( + +Galdino +et al. +, 2003 + +). + + + + +Ecological notes. +Within the rio Taquari, + +Pimelodella guato + +was sampled at the Palmeiras waterfall, in an area characterized by shallow waters, moderate water flow, and a sandy substrate ( + +Slobodian +et al. +, 2022 + +). This species exhibits abundance during the rainy season and is notably easy to capture, particularly during the nighttime ( + +Slobodian +et al. +, 2022 + +). + + + + +Etymology. +The species name + +guato + +is in honor of the indigenous Guató people, who are affectionately known as “people of the Pantanal waters” due to their primary mode of transportation, canoes. Historically, the Guató people inhabited an extensive area along the rio +Paraguai +(Schmidt, 1942). However, in the 1940s, they began to lose their territory due to cattle ranching, and many relocated to cities such as Cáceres and Corumbá. This dispersal led to a reduction in the Guató population, and since then, they have been fighting for recognition of their ethnicity and the demarcation of their lands ( +Costa, 2015 +). The choice of + +guato + +is a homage to the resilience and cultural significance of these people who inhabit the same region where the new species is found. It also recognizes the ongoing struggles with land delimitation that indigenous communities continue to face, particularly in +Brazil +. A noun in apposition. + + + + +FIGURE 4 | +Geographic distribution of + +Pimelodella guato + +in the rio Paraguai basin (red star, type-locality; red dots, paratype localities). The symbols might represent more than one voucher specimen each. + + + + +Conservation status. + +Pimelodella guato + +has predominantly been documented within the rio Miranda in the rio +Paraguai +basin. Despite several anthropic activities in this region, such as ecotourism and land use, which adversely affect water quality, comprehensive conservation plans and projects are notably lacking ( + +Boin +et al +., 2019 + +; + +Leite +et al +., 2022 + +). Moreover, both the rio Taquari and rio Coxim confront significant challenges related to erosion and river siltation ( + +Galdino +et al. +, 2003 + +, +2006 +; +Rabelo, Souza, 2021 +), also correlated to road paving in the Coxim municipality region (H. Gimênes-Júnior, 2023, pers. comm.). While geological factors in the region render it more susceptible to these issues, deforestation and livestock activities exacerbate erosion and siltation to alarming levels ( + +Galdino +et al. +, 2003 + +, +2006 +; +Rabelo, Souza, 2021 +). Biological and ecological information on + +P. guato + +remains unavailable, posing a challenge to accurately categorizing its conservation status. Nevertheless, despite the restrictive known distribution of the species, we suggest that + +P. guato + +be classified as Least Concern (LC), according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) categories and criteria (IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee, 2022). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/2D/25/DB/2D25DB6FC0442966FFA9FC0E598EFB9C.xml b/data/2D/25/DB/2D25DB6FC0442966FFA9FC0E598EFB9C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..91a6c2e0b38 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/2D/25/DB/2D25DB6FC0442966FFA9FC0E598EFB9C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ + + + +Description of Phylloneura rupestris sp. n. (Odonata, Platycnemididae) from the Western Ghats, India, with notes on its reproductive behaviour + + + +Author + +Chandran, A. Vivek +Aqua Research Lab, Department of Geology and Environmental Science, Christ College (Autonomous), Irinjalakuda, Thrissur, Kerala 680125, India & Society for Odonate Studies, Vellooparampil, Kuzhimattom PO, Kottayam, Kerala 686533, India +avivekchandran2@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Chandran, Reji +Society for Odonate Studies, Vellooparampil, Kuzhimattom PO, Kottayam, Kerala 686533, India + + + +Author + +Suraj, S. R. +Shola Nature Society, SRS Bhavan, Choodal, Meenmutty PO, Palode, Thiruvananthapuram + + + +Author + +Jose, Subin K. +Aqua Research Lab, Department of Geology and Environmental Science, Christ College (Autonomous), Irinjalakuda, Thrissur, Kerala 680125, India + + + +Author + +Koparde, Pankaj +Department of Environmental Studies, Dr. Vishwanath Karad MIT World Peace University, Kothrud, Pune, Maharashtra, 411038, India + +text + + +International Journal of Odonatology + + +2024 + +2024-02-13 + + +27 + + +26 +36 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.48156/1388.2024.1917259 + +journal article +10.48156/1388.2024.1917259 +2159-6719 +15555054 + + + + + +Genus + +Phylloneura +Fraser, 1922 + + + + + + +Type +species: + +Phylloneura westermanni + +(Hagen in +Selys, 1860 +) + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/2D/25/DB/2D25DB6FC044296DFFA9FBA15DC8FB9C.xml b/data/2D/25/DB/2D25DB6FC044296DFFA9FBA15DC8FB9C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0632a67bb03 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/2D/25/DB/2D25DB6FC044296DFFA9FBA15DC8FB9C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,578 @@ + + + +Description of Phylloneura rupestris sp. n. (Odonata, Platycnemididae) from the Western Ghats, India, with notes on its reproductive behaviour + + + +Author + +Chandran, A. Vivek +Aqua Research Lab, Department of Geology and Environmental Science, Christ College (Autonomous), Irinjalakuda, Thrissur, Kerala 680125, India & Society for Odonate Studies, Vellooparampil, Kuzhimattom PO, Kottayam, Kerala 686533, India +avivekchandran2@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Chandran, Reji +Society for Odonate Studies, Vellooparampil, Kuzhimattom PO, Kottayam, Kerala 686533, India + + + +Author + +Suraj, S. R. +Shola Nature Society, SRS Bhavan, Choodal, Meenmutty PO, Palode, Thiruvananthapuram + + + +Author + +Jose, Subin K. +Aqua Research Lab, Department of Geology and Environmental Science, Christ College (Autonomous), Irinjalakuda, Thrissur, Kerala 680125, India + + + +Author + +Koparde, Pankaj +Department of Environmental Studies, Dr. Vishwanath Karad MIT World Peace University, Kothrud, Pune, Maharashtra, 411038, India + +text + + +International Journal of Odonatology + + +2024 + +2024-02-13 + + +27 + + +26 +36 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.48156/1388.2024.1917259 + +journal article +10.48156/1388.2024.1917259 +2159-6719 +15555054 + + + + + + + +Phylloneura rupestris +Chandran, Chandran and Jose + +sp. n. + + + + + + +( +Figs 1 +, +2A +, +3 +, +4A +, +6–10 +) + + + + +Type material + + + +Holotype + +♂ + + + +Labelled +“ +Holotype + +Phylloneura rupestris +Chandran, Chandran, Jose + +, +India +, +Kerala +, Thiruvananthapuram, Ponmudi [ +8.749690° N +, +77.127098° E +], + +elevation +850 m + +above MSL, + +28 vi 2023 + +, +Coll. A. Vivek Chandran +” ( +WGRC +, +ZSI +) + +. + + + +Paratypes + + + + +2 ♂♂ +and +1 ♀ +, same data as the holotype + +. + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Phylloneura rupestris + +sp. n. +can be distinguished in the field from its only congener, + +P. westermanni +, + +by the broad azure blue marking on S7 that extends to 3/4 of the segment dorsolaterally (S7 has only an azure blue apical ring occupying 1/5 of the segment in + +P. westermanni + +) ( +Fig. 2 +). The following features become evident upon close inspection of specimens and, in combination, help to distinguish + +P. rupestris + +sp. n. +from +P. westerman- ni +( +Figs 3 +, +4 +): Pt rectangular with a length of +1.5 mm +(Pt squarish with a length of +1 mm +in + +P. westermanni + +). Cerci thicker and with broad ventral processes (cerci thinner and with narrower ventral processes in +P. wes- termanni +). Tips of paraprocts rounded (tips of paraprocts taper to acute points in + +P. westermanni + +). In the apical part of the male’s genital ligula, the two outer processes are hammer-shaped, and the two inner processes are thicker (tips of the two outer processes end as small lobes and the two inner processes are thinner in + +P. westermanni + +). + + +It must be noted here that in the original description of + +P. westermanni + +by +Fraser (1922 +, +1933 +), the “apical half” of S7 is said to be azure blue. This, however, is not correct, and as is evident from photographs published later on ( +Gopalan et al., 2022 +; +Nair et al., 2021 +; +Subramanian, 2009 +, +2018 +; +Subramanian et al., 2022 +; all from north of the Palghat Gap) and specimens collected in this study, only the apical fifh of S7 is azure blue. To verify this further, we obtained images of the +holotype +of + +P. westermanni + +from the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, +USA +( +Fig. 5 +). It was thus confirmed that only the apical fifh of S7 is azure blue in + +P. westermanni + +and Fraser had erroneously stated that the apical half of S7 is blue. This error was probably carried forward from the original description by +Selys (1860) +who stated, “moitié finale du 7e et les trois derniers bleus” [final half of the 7 +th +and the last three segments blue]. The watercolour painting in the Selys collection states “après la description”, which indicates that the illustration was made based on the description and without revisiting the +holotype +and thus explains why this illustration shows the apical half of segment 7 being blue as well ( +Verspui & Wasscher, 2016 +). + + + +Figure 2. +Terminal abdominal segments of (A) + +Phylloneura rupestris + +sp. n. +and (B) + +P. westermanni + +, illustrating the difference in markings on S7. + + + + +Figure 3. + +Phylloneura rupestris + +sp. n. +: (A) in its habitat, (B) pterostigma, (C) caudal appendages, (D) genital ligula; +P. wester- manni +: (E) in its habitat, (F) pterostigma, (G) caudal appendages, (H) genital ligula. + + + + +Figure 4. +Caudal appendages of (A) + +Phylloneura rupestris + +sp. nov. +and (B) + +P. westermanni + +, traced from original photographs. + + + + +Figure 5. +Images of the holotype of + +Phylloneura westermanni + +: (A) habitus, (B) label, (C) dorsal view of terminal segments, (D) lateral view of terminal segments, (E) dorsal view of caudal appendages, (F) lateral view of caudal appendages. Photos: Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University; © President and Fellows of Harvard College. https://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. + + + + +Description of the +holotype +( +Figs 6 +& +7 +) + + + +Male. Total length +60 mm +; abdomen +49 mm +; FW +37.5 mm +; HW +36 mm +. + +Repository reference number: ZSI/WGRC/I.R.-INV 25601. +Head. Middle and lateral lobes of labium white, tipped with black; labrum, anteclypeus and postclypeus steely blue-black, outer margin of postclypeus projecting as short horns at both ends; bases of mandibles black, with a central blue spot; genae blue, with a black band which is confluent with the black of the clypeus; antefrons black, but the blue of the genae spreads onto it narrowly; postfrons black throughout; rest of the head black, including its ventral side; lower 2/3 of the eyes ultramarine blue, capped with black; ocelli translucent white. +Prothorax. Posterior lobe black throughout; middle lobe almost completely black dorsally, but with a short ingress of azure blue from the anterior lobe, azure blue laterally; propleuron azure blue; anterior lobe almost completely azure blue, but with a short ingress of black from the middle lobe at two points dorsally. +Pterothorax. Jet black marked with azure blue as follows: middorsal carina and mesepisternum black; very narrow antehumeral blue stripes; mesepimeron black with a white spot at the anterior end on each side; metepisternum black with a broad blue stripe; mesinfraepisternum black, with only its lower end being blue; metepimeron blue; underside of thorax bluish white. +Legs. Black, coxae and basal halves of trochanters blue; extensor face of tibiae pale yellow. + +Wings. Hyaline, lightly smoky; Ab complete, arched at origin, inclining towards the rear border of the wing distally; Pt dark reddish brown, rectangular, +1.5 mm +in length, covering 3 cells, braced between thick, black nervures; Ax +2 in +all wings; Px +33 in +lef FW, +32 in +right FW, +29 in +both HWs; many double cells in all wings, mostly towards the tips of the FWs. + + + +Figure 6. +Photographs of + +Phylloneura rupestris + +sp. n. +, holotype ♂ in the wild: (A) in its habitat, (B) dorsofrontal view of head, (C) dorsal view of head, prothorax and pterothorax, (D) ventrofrontal view of head, (E) lateral view of head, prothorax and pterothorax, (F) dorsal view of terminal segments, (G) lateral view of caudal appendages. + + +Abdomen. Black, marked with blue as follows: S1 broadly blue, with black basal and apical margins, the former turning into a median spot dorsally; S2 with a broad blue ventrolateral spot; S3 and S4 have very narrow basal annules; S5 has an almost invisible basal spot; S6 fully black; S7 with a broad black apical margin from where a large blue stripe extends to 3/4 of the segment towards its base, this stripe is split centrally from half its length; S8 and S9 entirely blue on dorsum, except for very narrow basal black annules, laterally almost fully blue, but with irregular infusions of black towards the bases and apices; S10 blue on dorsum, black laterally. +Caudal appendages. Black, 1.5 times the length of S10, covered irregularly with light brown hairs; cerci broad at their bases, with an upper obtuse tubercle at the base and another at the tip, a broad ventral process at its apical 3/4 portion; paraprocts broad at their bases, sloping downwards and tapering gradually, tips round- ed and directed upward. + + +Paratype +1 + + + +Male. Total length +60 mm +; abdomen +49 mm +; FW +37 mm +; HW +35 mm +. + +Repository reference number: ZSI/WGRC/I.R.-INV 25602. + +Px +30 in +both FWs, +27 in +lef HW and +26 in +right HW; the rest agreeing with the +holotype +. + + +Genital ligula. As illustrated in +Fig. 3D +, first segment broad and curved; second segment short and featureless; tip of third segment projecting into four filaments, the two outer ones hammer-shaped, the two inner ones thick, conical, curved slightly at tips. + + + +Paratype +2 + + + +Male. Total length +60 mm +; abdomen +49 mm +; FW +36 mm +; HW +34.5 mm +. + +Repository reference number: ZSI/WGRC/I.R.-INV 25603. + +Px +31 in +lef FW, +30 in +right FW, +29 in +lef HW, and +26 in +right HW; the rest agreeing with the +holotype +. + + + +Paratype +3 ( +Fig. 8 +) + + + +Female. Total length +58 mm +; abdomen +47 mm +; FW +36.5 mm +; HW +34.5 mm +. + +Repository reference number: ZSI/WGRC/I.R.-INV 25604. +Similar to the male, except for sexual dimorphic differences and blue markings on the terminal abdominal segments. Abdomen shorter and more robust; S7 with an + + +Figure 7. +Photographs of preserved + +Phylloneura rupestris + +sp. n. +holotype ♂: (A) habitus, (B) wings, (C) dorsal view of caudal appendages, (D) lateral view of caudal appendages. + + + + +Figure 8. + +Phylloneura rupestris + +sp. n. +, paratype ♀: (A) habitus, (B) lateral view of the terminal three abdominal segments, (C) wings, (D) frontal view of the head, (E) ventrolateral view of the terminal abdominal segments. + + +apical blue ring, thinner on the dorsum, expanding later- +ally, but not joining ventrally; S8 and S9 with large trian- +gular dorsal blue spots; dorsum of S10 completely blue. +Caudal appendages. Black, covered with light brown +hairs; cerci short and conical; vulvar scale blue, tipped +with black, not reaching the end of the abdomen; ovi- +positor black, robust. + +Annotations + + + + +Male + +Phylloneura rupestris + +sp. n. +can at once be told apart in the field from male + +P. westermanni + +by their extensive blue marking on S7, which in the latter is reduced to a thick apical ring. Female + +P. rupestris + +sp. n. +have a distinctive apical blue ring on S7 as well, which is obscure in the female + +P. westermanni + +. When a male specimen is held in the hand, a close look at the caudal appendages with a magnifying lens helps with confirming its specifics identity, as + +P. rupestris + +sp. n. +has considerably thicker cerci and rounded tips of its paraprocts. Moreover, as per current knowledge, the ranges of these two species do not overlap. + + + + +Figure 9. +Habitat of + +Phylloneura rupestris + +sp. n. + + + + +Figure 10. +Reproductive behaviour of + +Phylloneura rupestris + +sp. n. +: (A) in tandem, (B) intra-male sperm translocation, (C) copula, (D) oviposition. + + + + +Etymology + + +The species epithet + +rupestris + +is derived from Latin and signifies “that lives on cliffs or rocks”, acknowledging this species’ habitat predilection. + + + + +Distribution + + +Presently, the new species is known only from the +type +locality (Ponmudi Hills, southern Western Ghats), but it could be present in similar habitats (seasonal streams flowing over rocky cliffs at mid-altitudes) in the Agasthyamalai Hills, as these form a continuous chain of forested hills in the southern Western Ghats. + +Temporal distribution. Recorded in June (30) and July (2). + +Natural history + + +A population of 30 individuals was seen perched on vegetation around a steep rocky cliff over which rills of a seasonal stream flowed ( +Fig. 9 +). The average depth of the stream, measured with a tape, was +0.14 m +. The sky was overcast and there was light drizzle. Most of the observed individuals were males, and females were seen only while mating. They occasionally made short, slow flights, probably chasing flying insect prey, before returning to their perches. + + +Reproductive behaviour + + +Oviposition was observed in six pairs seen, but photographs, and times of the entire sequence of reproductive activities could be taken for only one pair ( +Fig. 10 +). The duration of each activity is given in parenthesis: first, the male descended from its perch very slowly, hovered just above the stream, and dipped its abdomen in the water. Thereafer, it flew back in the direction of its former perch and caught a female in tandem (22 s). The male performed intra-male sperm translocation with the female held in tandem (10 s). Next, the pair flew around in tandem over the stream and slowly descended (18 s). The female oviposited on a submerged mat of moss in the stream, with the male holding it in tandem (10 min). The pair took to flight again, perched on another patch of moss in the stream about +3 m +away, and oviposited again (4 min). Thereafter, the male, with the female held in tandem, hung on streamside vegetation (41 s). Afer this, the pair separated and flew off in different directions. The entire reproductive activity of the observed pair thus lasted for 15.51 minutes. + + +All six observed pairs oviposited on moss growing in the seasonal rills in the rocky cliff. This oviposition technique is in sharp contrast to that of + +P. westermanni + +, four pairs of which were observed by AVC ovipositing on the surface roots of riparian trees ( +Fig. 11 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/4E/30/31/4E303164FFD7FFA79744FF16EBD3525A.xml b/data/4E/30/31/4E303164FFD7FFA79744FF16EBD3525A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cfea2633181 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/4E/30/31/4E303164FFD7FFA79744FF16EBD3525A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,255 @@ + + + +The larva of Hetaerina duplex Selys, 1853 (Odonata: Calopterygidae) with a key to known Colombian larvae species + + + +Author + +Montes-Fontalvo, Jenilee +Sección Entomología, Colecciones Biológicas, Centro Colecciones y Gestión de Especies, Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Villa de Leyva, Boyacá, Colombia + + + +Author + +Stand-Pérez, Miguel +Red de Biología Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecología A. C., Xalapa, Veracruz, México + +text + + +International Journal of Odonatology + + +2025 + +2025-03-27 + + +28 + + +16 +22 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.48156/1388.2025.1917310 + +journal article +10.48156/1388.2025.1917310 +2159-6719 + + + + + + + +Hetaerina duplex + +Selys, 1853 + + + +( +Figure 2 +) + + + + + +Material examined + + + +Colombia +, +1♀ +, + +9 x 2012 + +, +Quindío Department +, +Filandia Municipality +, +Barbas Bremen Nature Reserve +, +4.69694444°N +, - +75.65472222°W +, + +1650 m + + +.a.s.l., Leg: J. Montes, L. Perez; + +1♀ +, + +13 v 2022 + +, +Risaralda Department +, +Pueblo Rico Municipality +, +Monte Bello Township +, +Tatamá National Park +, +5.2357126°N +, - +76.0871193°W +, +M. Stand +leg. + + + +Description of final instar larva + +Coloration of head and thorax mainly brownish with dark brownish dots, legs yellowish with dark brown dots. + +Head. Brownish with dark brown pattern ( +Figure 2a +), with prominent and rounded posterolateral angles; antenna without setae. Labium: prementum-postmentum articulation reaching the anterior margin of mesocoxae; prementum with two setae on internal side of each lobe of ligula, external margins of ligular lobes serrate; labial palp ending in three well-developed and incurved hooks forming an 120° angle with it, median hook longest, inner one smallest; movable hook short- er than palp; inner margin of palp with small spines; four short apical palpal setae nearouter margin as in +Figure 2b +. Mandibles formula: L 12345 0 a(m +1234567 +)b/ +R +12345 y ab ( +Figure 2c–d +). + + + +Figure 3. +Distribution of + +Hetaerina +species + +in Colombia, part I. + + + +Thorax. Anterior margin of pronotum widely concave, with one prominent midlateral projection on each side pointing forward, posterior margin convex at middle; wing sheaths extending to posterior margin of S3; Legs: pale with three dark bands on femur, three protibial dark and faded bands; no setae or spines on femur and tibia. +Abdomen +: Lateral margins of S2–10 carinate, with well-developed posterolateral spine; posterolateral spine of S10 with five small spinules ( +Figure 2a +); posterior margin of S10 with one mid-dorsal spine, and a group of four small spines each side of postero-ventral border ( +Figure 2e–f +). Female ovipositor not reaching distal margin of S10 ( + +Figure +2g + +) and, in ventral view, with three ventral rows of spines ( +Figure 2f +); cercus conical and straight, 0.5 the length of S10. Caudal gills: lateral gills triquetral and lanceolate, with spines along lateral margins; central gill foliaceous, rounded at tip, with spines along dorsal and ventral margins about 0.7 the length of lateral gills. + + + +Figure 4. +Distribution of + +Hetaerina +species + +in Colombia, part II. + + + +Measurements (mm) + +Total body length (without caudal gills): 23.1. Head: maximum length: 2.8, maximum width: 4; prementum maximum length: 4.2, prementum maximum width: 2.9; clef length: 1.7; movable hook: 1.3. Thorax and legs: inner wing pads length: 6, outer wing pads length: 5.9; femur I: 4.5; femur II: 5.8; femur III: 6.8; tibia I: 4; tibia II: 5.1; tibia III: 5.9. Abdomen: total length: 13.7; S1 length: 1.7; S2 length: 1.7; S3 length: 1.4; S4 length: 1.7; S5 length: 1.6; S6 length: 1.2; S7 length: 1.4; S8 length: 1.2; S9 length: 1; S10 length: 0.8; cerci length: 0.4; female ovipositor length: 1.8; lateral caudal gills length: 6.7, median caudal gill length: 4.9. + +Diagnosis + + + +Hetaerina duplex + +occurs in +Colombia +in the +Quindío +and +Risaralda +departments ( +Figure 3 +) and larvae for the present description were collected in fast-flowing streams, where they were found partially submerged among grassy vegetation. In Tatamá National Park, where +one specimen +was collected, + +H. duplex + +is sympatric with + +H. capitalis + +and shares the following characters: lateral pronotal protuberance rounded, posterior border of S8–9 without row of spines on the dorsal surface, and two premental setae on each side of clef, but differs from + +H. capitalis + +in: lateral well-developed spine on each side of the lateral carina of S2–10 (one row of small spines in the lateral carina of S +8–9 in + +H. capitalis + +) and S10 with one well-developed mid-dorsal spine on the posterior border (S10 with three small spines in + +H. capitalis + +). + + + + +Remarks + + +Like other + +Hetaerina +species + +inhabit lotic evironments, with or without abundant riparian vegetation ( +Guillermo-Ferreira & Bispo, 2012 +), + +Hetaerina duplex + +is record- ed in streams and small rivers with abundant vegetation, it has been found in sympatry with + +H. capitalis + +and + +H. cruentata +(Bota-Sierra et al., 2024) + +, interestingly, recent studies show that the surrounding vegetation determines the presence of the wing rubyspot (Stranding et al., 2022), the females have been seen ovipositing in dead wood inside river ponds ( +Bota-Sierra et al., 2019 +). Its distribution is limited to +Colombia +and +Ecuador +, and its conservation status, according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), is classified as Least Concern ( +Bota-Sierra & Palacino, 2016 +; +Bota-Sierra & Rache, 2016 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/9B/64/EF/9B64EF42FFCCFFEFFF8B8567FB8BFE8D.xml b/data/9B/64/EF/9B64EF42FFCCFFEFFF8B8567FB8BFE8D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..53705d00ef2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/9B/64/EF/9B64EF42FFCCFFEFFF8B8567FB8BFE8D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,300 @@ + + + +The final-instar larva of Bayadera strigata Davies & Yang, 1996 from Yunnan, China (Odonata: Zygoptera: Euphaeidae) + + + +Author + +Yang, Guo-Hui +College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Dali University, Yunnan 671003, China & Co-Innovation center for Cangshan Mountain and Erhai Lake Integrated Protection and Green Development of Yunnan Province, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan 671003, China & Cangshan Forest Ecosystem Observation and Research Station of Yunnan Province, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan 671003, China +yanggh727@sina.com + + + +Author + +Orr, Albert G. +Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, Australia; E-mail: agorr @ bigpond. com +agorr@bigpond.com + +text + + +International Journal of Odonatology + + +2024 + +2024-01-23 + + +27 + + +11 +18 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.48156/1388.2024.1917250 + +journal article +10.48156/1388.2024.1917250 +2159-6719 +15555014 + + + + + + + +Bayadera strigata +Davies & Yang, 1996 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 1 +, +2 +, +3 +, +4 +, +5 +, +6 +, +7 +) + + +Material examined + +Head. Broad and pentagonal in shape, flat dorsally, covered with numerous fine setae on the dorsum except on the vertex ( +Figs 2 +, +3a +). Labrum with long SS and scattered +CVS +on basal, and dense +CVS +and short SS at 4/5 of the base of the labrum ( +Figs 3a–b +). Compound eyes broad and rounded, protruding anterolaterally. Occiput margin concave, with scattered +SPS +; postocular lobes strongly developed and rounded, but dense +SPS +at the posterior corners create a seemingly squared profile; anterior margin with +CVS +along the margins of the compound eyes, posterior margin intermingled with small spines, long SS and +CVS +. Genae large, with rows of +SPS +and +CVS +along the ventral margins of the compound eyes; anterior margin of right gena with rows of blunt and distinct spines (7–8) and a row of +CVS +infused with +SPS +and SS ( +Figs 3b–c +); anterior margin of the lef gena with a row of 9–10 dominant spines and row of +CVS +infused with +SPS +and SS ( +Figs 3d–e +). Antennae unusually long (1.3 × length of head measured from occipital margin to labrum), filiform, 7-segmented; third antennomere longest, length of antennomeres (mm): 0.67:0.8 6:1.23:0.83:0.46:0.23:0.09, giving a total length of 4.37 ( +Fig. 4a +). Prementum 1.4 × longer than wide, subpenta- +1 ♀ +larva, + +6.iv.2020 + + +, + +ZiYang +stream ( +25.74° N +, +99.99° E +, + +2320 m +a.s.l. + +), +YangBi County +, +Bai Autonomous Prefecture of Dali +, +Yunnan Province +, +China +, +Guo-Hui +Yang +leg. +The ZiYang +is one of steams on +Mt Cangshan in Dali +, +Yunnan +. +2 ♀♀ +, +2 ♂♂ +larvae, + +27.iv.2023 + + +, + +same locality, +Guo-Hui +Yang +leg. +1 ♂ +F-0 adult emergence + +2.vi.2023 + + +; +2 ♂♂ +larvae, +27.ix.2023 +, + +Mt Maer +( +26.25° N +, +100.13° E +, + +2750 m +a.s.l. + +), +HeQing County +, Bai Autonomous Prefecture of Dali, +Yunnan Province +, +China +, +Dong-Dong Zi +leg. +1 ♂ +F-0 successful emergence + +4.xi.2023 + + +. + + +Description + + +Habitus. A medium-sized larva, somewhat flattened, robust build, with long heavy legs; colour brownish black, lacking a distinct pattern, with dark saccoid gills with blunt and pale tips ( +Fig. 2 +). + + + +Figure 1. +Caudal appendage of + +Bayadera strigata + +, (a) dorsal view; (b) lateral view. + + + + +Figure 2. +Larval habitus of + +Bayadera strigata + +, dorsal view. + + + + +Figure 3. +Head of a larva of + +Bayadera strigata + +and morphological details of the labrum and genae: (a) head, dorsal view; (b) labrum, dorsal view; (c) right genae; (d) lef genae; (e) detail of arrangement of the spines and setae along the margin of the right genae; (f) detail of arrangement of the spines and setae along the margin of the lef genae. + + + +gonal in shape, with a row of 14–16 (lef side) and 13– 17 (right side) strong broad spines and numerous small spines (each spine bearing SS) along the lateral margin of each side ( +Figs 4b–c +); ligula convex, its anterior margin finely serrated, with a tiny median clef ( +Fig. 4d +); labial palp long, 0.54 × as long as the prementum, outer margin with scattered SS and CVS, while SS, CVS and SPS are dense in the basal half, weakly serrated on the inner margin, distal end with three processes, the outer process moderately incurved with a wavy outer margin, the middle process largest, weakly unciate, the inner process short and securiform, movable hook about 0.44 × as long as the labial palp, acuminate, bent slightly inwards ( +Fig. 4e +). Mandibles brown, formula: + + +L 1+1’2340 a(m +1.2.3.4.5 +)b / R 1+1’234 y a(m +0 +)b, asymmetrical,fourincisors,welldeveloped,4>3>2>1+1’; molar crest with seven teeth (a>1=2=3=4=5>b) on lef mandible; a>b, b very small on the right mandible ( +Figs 4f–i +); Maxilla with seven hooks, four long and three short, sharply pointed, basally with short setae; maxillary palp bearing dense, long setae ( +Figs 4j–k +). + + +Thorax. Prothorax trapezoidal, narrower than the head, with scattered CVS intermixed with SS. Procoxa arc-shaped, with a central protrusion, and supracoxal armament on prothorax circularly arc-shaped, with a depression in the middle, lateral margin of pronotal disc rounded ( +Figs 2 +, +3a +). Synthorax nearly equal to head in width, covered with SS on its dorsal side. Wing sheaths divergent, forewing sheaths reaching the rear border of S5, hindwing sheaths extending to middle of S6. Legs long and robust; metafemur straight, reaching distal end of S7; all femorae and tibiae bearing SS and CVS; a row of claviform to rod-like setae on the distal end of the tibial comb; tarsal formula 3-3-3; claws small and simple ( +Figs 2 +, +5a +). + + +Abdomen. Long, gradually narrowing from S1 to distal end, with scattered CVS and SS; seven pairs of pale lateroventral abdominal gills from S2 to S8. Male gonapophyses well developed, base stout, tips blunt, moderately divergent distally in ventral view, reaching more than halfway along S10, with a plate-like spine on the ventral side ( +Figs 5b–c +); female gonapophyses rising from the distal end of S8 and basal S9 and extending almost to the distal margin of S10 ( +Figs 5d–e +); lateral valvulae each with a nipple-shaped process at the tip and a plate-like spine on the ventral side; cerci in both sexes long, narrow, slightly curved with pointed tips, bearing claviform to rod-like setae; male paraprocts triangular. Caudal gills brownish black, swollen, saccoidshaped, with a yellowish white terminal filament, covered with SS; median gill about as long as the lateral gills ( +Figs 5f–h +). + + + +Figure 4. +Details of the head and mouthparts of the final instar of + +Bayadera strigata + +: (a) right antenna; (b) labium, ventral view; (c) labium, dorsal view; (d) ligula, dorsal view; (e) labial palp, ventral view; (f) right mandible, ventral view; (g) right mandible, inner face; (h) lef mandible, ventral view; (i) lef mandible, inner face; (j) lef maxilla; (k) right maxilla. + + +Measurements (mm). Larvae (in alcohol, N = 7), body length (excluding antennae and caudal gills) 14.8–16.2; length of abdomen (including caudal gills) 14–15.4; maximum width of head 5; length of hind femur 5–6.5; lateral caudal gills 7–8. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/ED/4E/C1/ED4EC161FFA7FF82FE62F913BD9BD26E.xml b/data/ED/4E/C1/ED4EC161FFA7FF82FE62F913BD9BD26E.xml index f583eb9b336..85b17da6663 100644 --- a/data/ED/4E/C1/ED4EC161FFA7FF82FE62F913BD9BD26E.xml +++ b/data/ED/4E/C1/ED4EC161FFA7FF82FE62F913BD9BD26E.xml @@ -1,71 +1,71 @@ - - - -Review of the pseudoscorpion genus Stenohya Beier, 1967 from China (Pseudoscorpiones, Neobisiidae) + + + +Review of the pseudoscorpion genus Stenohya Beier, 1967 from China (Pseudoscorpiones, Neobisiidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Zhao, Jiaqi -395D08F4-DB8D-4AD9-AED5-4117CCF2C798 -Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. -zhaoj_q0208@163.com +Zhao, Jiaqi +395D08F4-DB8D-4AD9-AED5-4117CCF2C798 +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. +zhaoj_q0208@163.com - - -Author + + +Author -Guo, Xiangbo -0A026776-763D-4CBE-84A6-FF6769F05F49 -Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. -xiangboguo@126.com +Guo, Xiangbo +0A026776-763D-4CBE-84A6-FF6769F05F49 +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. +xiangboguo@126.com - - -Author + + +Author -Gao, Zhizhong -3DCBFD88-F788-49D0-B5B3-FB8FB0BD7764 -Department of Biology, Xinzhou Normal University, Xinzhou, 034000 Shanxi, P. R. China. -gaozhizhong1987@126.com +Gao, Zhizhong +3DCBFD88-F788-49D0-B5B3-FB8FB0BD7764 +Department of Biology, Xinzhou Normal University, Xinzhou, 034000 Shanxi, P. R. China. +gaozhizhong1987@126.com - - -Author + + +Author -Zhang, Feng -C69045FC-A7DF-4503-852D-48DDEB43EA69 -Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. -dudu06042001@163.com +Zhang, Feng +C69045FC-A7DF-4503-852D-48DDEB43EA69 +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. +dudu06042001@163.com -text - - -European Journal of Taxonomy +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy - -2025 - -2025-05-26 + +2025 + +2025-05-26 - -993 + +993 - -1 -104 + +1 +104 - -https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2909/13181 + +https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2909/13181 -journal article -10.5852/ejt.2025.993.2909 -2118-9773 -15543356 -697E434D-7C75-42BC-9943-367D46743DEB +journal article +10.5852/ejt.2025.993.2909 +2118-9773 +15543356 +697E434D-7C75-42BC-9943-367D46743DEB @@ -133,21 +133,20 @@ Male pedipalpal femur with a large intumescence on the subbasal prolateral surfa Other material - + CHINA • 10 ♂♂ , 8 ♀♀ ; -Guangxi Zhuang -Autonomous Region +Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region , -Lingui District +Lingui District , -Lingui Town +Lingui Town , -Jiahe Garden +Jiahe Garden ; 25°14′51″ N , @@ -161,7 +160,9 @@ a.s.l. 14 Jan. 2024 -; in leaf litter ( +; +in leaf litter +( Fig. 2F ); Jiaqi Zhao @@ -169,22 +170,20 @@ a.s.l. Jianzhou Sun and Yiting Xu -leg.; -Ps. -- +leg.; Ps.- MHBU-GX2024011401–18 • - -five tritonymphs; -Guangxi Zhuang -Autonomous Region + +five tritonymphs +; +Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region , -Lingui District +Lingui District , -Lingui Town +Lingui Town , -Jiahe Garden +Jiahe Garden ; 25°14′51″ N , @@ -198,7 +197,9 @@ a.s.l. 2 Dec. 2023 -; in leaf litter; +; +in leaf litter +; Jiaqi Zhao , Jianzhou Sun @@ -206,9 +207,7 @@ a.s.l. Tao Zheng and Songtao Shi -leg.; -Ps. -- +leg.; Ps.- MHBU-GX2023120201–05 diff --git a/data/ED/4E/C1/ED4EC161FFA7FF9AFE7DFD2EBE3BD207.xml b/data/ED/4E/C1/ED4EC161FFA7FF9AFE7DFD2EBE3BD207.xml index 186869e0fff..d2fcf8ff889 100644 --- a/data/ED/4E/C1/ED4EC161FFA7FF9AFE7DFD2EBE3BD207.xml +++ b/data/ED/4E/C1/ED4EC161FFA7FF9AFE7DFD2EBE3BD207.xml @@ -1,71 +1,71 @@ - - - -Review of the pseudoscorpion genus Stenohya Beier, 1967 from China (Pseudoscorpiones, Neobisiidae) + + + +Review of the pseudoscorpion genus Stenohya Beier, 1967 from China (Pseudoscorpiones, Neobisiidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Zhao, Jiaqi -395D08F4-DB8D-4AD9-AED5-4117CCF2C798 -Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. -zhaoj_q0208@163.com +Zhao, Jiaqi +395D08F4-DB8D-4AD9-AED5-4117CCF2C798 +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. +zhaoj_q0208@163.com - - -Author + + +Author -Guo, Xiangbo -0A026776-763D-4CBE-84A6-FF6769F05F49 -Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. -xiangboguo@126.com +Guo, Xiangbo +0A026776-763D-4CBE-84A6-FF6769F05F49 +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. +xiangboguo@126.com - - -Author + + +Author -Gao, Zhizhong -3DCBFD88-F788-49D0-B5B3-FB8FB0BD7764 -Department of Biology, Xinzhou Normal University, Xinzhou, 034000 Shanxi, P. R. China. -gaozhizhong1987@126.com +Gao, Zhizhong +3DCBFD88-F788-49D0-B5B3-FB8FB0BD7764 +Department of Biology, Xinzhou Normal University, Xinzhou, 034000 Shanxi, P. R. China. +gaozhizhong1987@126.com - - -Author + + +Author -Zhang, Feng -C69045FC-A7DF-4503-852D-48DDEB43EA69 -Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. -dudu06042001@163.com +Zhang, Feng +C69045FC-A7DF-4503-852D-48DDEB43EA69 +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. +dudu06042001@163.com -text - - -European Journal of Taxonomy +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy - -2025 - -2025-05-26 + +2025 + +2025-05-26 - -993 + +993 - -1 -104 + +1 +104 - -https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2909/13181 + +https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2909/13181 -journal article -10.5852/ejt.2025.993.2909 -2118-9773 -15543356 -697E434D-7C75-42BC-9943-367D46743DEB +journal article +10.5852/ejt.2025.993.2909 +2118-9773 +15543356 +697E434D-7C75-42BC-9943-367D46743DEB @@ -131,13 +131,11 @@ Zhan Material examined - + + Holotype - - - CHINA • 1 ♀ @@ -146,7 +144,7 @@ Zhan , Fuzhou City , -Gushan Mountain +Gushan Mountain ; 26°04′ N , @@ -157,9 +155,7 @@ Zhan ; Fusheng Huang -leg.; -Ps. -- +leg.; Ps.- MHBU-FJ750224 . @@ -168,7 +164,7 @@ leg.; Other material - + CHINA • 7 ♂♂ @@ -179,7 +175,7 @@ leg.; , Fuzhou City , -Gushan Mountain +Gushan Mountain ; 26°05′39″ N , @@ -199,9 +195,7 @@ a.s.l. Weitong Wang and Xiao Zang -leg.; -Ps. -- +leg.;Ps.- MHBU-FJ2018040401–11 . diff --git a/data/ED/4E/C1/ED4EC161FFACFF91FE10FE16BD04D232.xml b/data/ED/4E/C1/ED4EC161FFACFF91FE10FE16BD04D232.xml index cbccdb6db7d..6179edd086c 100644 --- a/data/ED/4E/C1/ED4EC161FFACFF91FE10FE16BD04D232.xml +++ b/data/ED/4E/C1/ED4EC161FFACFF91FE10FE16BD04D232.xml @@ -1,71 +1,71 @@ - - - -Review of the pseudoscorpion genus Stenohya Beier, 1967 from China (Pseudoscorpiones, Neobisiidae) + + + +Review of the pseudoscorpion genus Stenohya Beier, 1967 from China (Pseudoscorpiones, Neobisiidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Zhao, Jiaqi -395D08F4-DB8D-4AD9-AED5-4117CCF2C798 -Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. -zhaoj_q0208@163.com +Zhao, Jiaqi +395D08F4-DB8D-4AD9-AED5-4117CCF2C798 +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. +zhaoj_q0208@163.com - - -Author + + +Author -Guo, Xiangbo -0A026776-763D-4CBE-84A6-FF6769F05F49 -Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. -xiangboguo@126.com +Guo, Xiangbo +0A026776-763D-4CBE-84A6-FF6769F05F49 +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. +xiangboguo@126.com - - -Author + + +Author -Gao, Zhizhong -3DCBFD88-F788-49D0-B5B3-FB8FB0BD7764 -Department of Biology, Xinzhou Normal University, Xinzhou, 034000 Shanxi, P. R. China. -gaozhizhong1987@126.com +Gao, Zhizhong +3DCBFD88-F788-49D0-B5B3-FB8FB0BD7764 +Department of Biology, Xinzhou Normal University, Xinzhou, 034000 Shanxi, P. R. China. +gaozhizhong1987@126.com - - -Author + + +Author -Zhang, Feng -C69045FC-A7DF-4503-852D-48DDEB43EA69 -Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. -dudu06042001@163.com +Zhang, Feng +C69045FC-A7DF-4503-852D-48DDEB43EA69 +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. +dudu06042001@163.com -text - - -European Journal of Taxonomy +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy - -2025 - -2025-05-26 + +2025 + +2025-05-26 - -993 + +993 - -1 -104 + +1 +104 - -https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2909/13181 + +https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2909/13181 -journal article -10.5852/ejt.2025.993.2909 -2118-9773 -15543356 -697E434D-7C75-42BC-9943-367D46743DEB +journal article +10.5852/ejt.2025.993.2909 +2118-9773 +15543356 +697E434D-7C75-42BC-9943-367D46743DEB @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ Zhao - + Holotype @@ -131,8 +131,8 @@ Zhao Jinggangshan City , Guangming Township -, 868 -County Road +, +868 County Road ; 26°26′04″ N , @@ -146,7 +146,9 @@ a.s.l. 31 Jan. 2023 -; in leaf litter and under rocks; +; +in leaf litter and under rocks +; Xiangbo Guo , Jianzhou Sun @@ -154,15 +156,13 @@ a.s.l. Tao Zheng & Songtao Shi -leg.; -Ps. -- +leg.; Ps.- MHBU-JX2023013101 . - + Paratypes diff --git a/data/ED/4E/C1/ED4EC161FFACFF92FE50F9EABEF3D068.xml b/data/ED/4E/C1/ED4EC161FFACFF92FE50F9EABEF3D068.xml index df7cb34aeaa..1643c13c02b 100644 --- a/data/ED/4E/C1/ED4EC161FFACFF92FE50F9EABEF3D068.xml +++ b/data/ED/4E/C1/ED4EC161FFACFF92FE50F9EABEF3D068.xml @@ -1,74 +1,74 @@ - - - -Review of the pseudoscorpion genus Stenohya Beier, 1967 from China (Pseudoscorpiones, Neobisiidae) + + + +Review of the pseudoscorpion genus Stenohya Beier, 1967 from China (Pseudoscorpiones, Neobisiidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Zhao, Jiaqi -395D08F4-DB8D-4AD9-AED5-4117CCF2C798 -Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. -zhaoj_q0208@163.com +Zhao, Jiaqi +395D08F4-DB8D-4AD9-AED5-4117CCF2C798 +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. +zhaoj_q0208@163.com - - -Author + + +Author -Guo, Xiangbo -0A026776-763D-4CBE-84A6-FF6769F05F49 -Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. -xiangboguo@126.com +Guo, Xiangbo +0A026776-763D-4CBE-84A6-FF6769F05F49 +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. +xiangboguo@126.com - - -Author + + +Author -Gao, Zhizhong -3DCBFD88-F788-49D0-B5B3-FB8FB0BD7764 -Department of Biology, Xinzhou Normal University, Xinzhou, 034000 Shanxi, P. R. China. -gaozhizhong1987@126.com +Gao, Zhizhong +3DCBFD88-F788-49D0-B5B3-FB8FB0BD7764 +Department of Biology, Xinzhou Normal University, Xinzhou, 034000 Shanxi, P. R. China. +gaozhizhong1987@126.com - - -Author + + +Author -Zhang, Feng -C69045FC-A7DF-4503-852D-48DDEB43EA69 -Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. -dudu06042001@163.com +Zhang, Feng +C69045FC-A7DF-4503-852D-48DDEB43EA69 +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. +dudu06042001@163.com -text - - -European Journal of Taxonomy +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy - -2025 - -2025-05-26 + +2025 + +2025-05-26 - -993 + +993 - -1 -104 + +1 +104 - -https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2909/13181 + +https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2909/13181 -journal article -10.5852/ejt.2025.993.2909 -2118-9773 -15543356 -697E434D-7C75-42BC-9943-367D46743DEB +journal article +10.5852/ejt.2025.993.2909 +2118-9773 +15543356 +697E434D-7C75-42BC-9943-367D46743DEB - + Stenohya hainanensis @@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ (海南狭伪$) + + Figs 1.14 , @@ -113,13 +115,11 @@ Material examined - + + Holotype - - - CHINA • ♂ @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ , Lingshui County , -Diaoluo Mountains +Diaoluo Mountains ; 18°40′ N , @@ -144,31 +144,27 @@ a.s.l. ; Xiangbo Guo -leg.; -Ps. -- +leg.; Ps.- MHBU-HN15012101 . - + + Paratypes - - - CHINA • 3 ♂♂ , 2 ♀♀ ; same collection data as for holotype; Ps.- -MHBU-HN - -15012102 - + +MHBU-HN +15012102 –06 + . diff --git a/data/ED/4E/C1/ED4EC161FFAEFF9AFE3BFE8FBA6DD6F4.xml b/data/ED/4E/C1/ED4EC161FFAEFF9AFE3BFE8FBA6DD6F4.xml index a91b40dbdc3..e6d708d3ee6 100644 --- a/data/ED/4E/C1/ED4EC161FFAEFF9AFE3BFE8FBA6DD6F4.xml +++ b/data/ED/4E/C1/ED4EC161FFAEFF9AFE3BFE8FBA6DD6F4.xml @@ -1,74 +1,74 @@ - - - -Review of the pseudoscorpion genus Stenohya Beier, 1967 from China (Pseudoscorpiones, Neobisiidae) + + + +Review of the pseudoscorpion genus Stenohya Beier, 1967 from China (Pseudoscorpiones, Neobisiidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Zhao, Jiaqi -395D08F4-DB8D-4AD9-AED5-4117CCF2C798 -Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. -zhaoj_q0208@163.com +Zhao, Jiaqi +395D08F4-DB8D-4AD9-AED5-4117CCF2C798 +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. +zhaoj_q0208@163.com - - -Author + + +Author -Guo, Xiangbo -0A026776-763D-4CBE-84A6-FF6769F05F49 -Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. -xiangboguo@126.com +Guo, Xiangbo +0A026776-763D-4CBE-84A6-FF6769F05F49 +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. +xiangboguo@126.com - - -Author + + +Author -Gao, Zhizhong -3DCBFD88-F788-49D0-B5B3-FB8FB0BD7764 -Department of Biology, Xinzhou Normal University, Xinzhou, 034000 Shanxi, P. R. China. -gaozhizhong1987@126.com +Gao, Zhizhong +3DCBFD88-F788-49D0-B5B3-FB8FB0BD7764 +Department of Biology, Xinzhou Normal University, Xinzhou, 034000 Shanxi, P. R. China. +gaozhizhong1987@126.com - - -Author + + +Author -Zhang, Feng -C69045FC-A7DF-4503-852D-48DDEB43EA69 -Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. -dudu06042001@163.com +Zhang, Feng +C69045FC-A7DF-4503-852D-48DDEB43EA69 +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. & Hebei Basic Science Center for Biotic Interaction, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. +dudu06042001@163.com -text - - -European Journal of Taxonomy +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy - -2025 - -2025-05-26 + +2025 + +2025-05-26 - -993 + +993 - -1 -104 + +1 +104 - -https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2909/13181 + +https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2909/13181 -journal article -10.5852/ejt.2025.993.2909 -2118-9773 -15543356 -697E434D-7C75-42BC-9943-367D46743DEB +journal article +10.5852/ejt.2025.993.2909 +2118-9773 +15543356 +697E434D-7C75-42BC-9943-367D46743DEB - + @@ -79,14 +79,14 @@ Zhao, Guo & Zhang (哈氏狭伪$) + + urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: F709222D-882E-42B5-BFDF-1CAB3FE060EA - - Figs 1.17 , @@ -128,13 +128,11 @@ Male pedipalpal chelal hand has a projection with bifid horn-like bulge on prola Type material - + + Holotype - - - CHINA • ♂ @@ -143,7 +141,7 @@ Male pedipalpal chelal hand has a projection with bifid horn-like bulge on prola , Yunlong County , -Caojian town +Caojian town ; 25°44′03″ N , @@ -157,7 +155,9 @@ a.s.l. 1 Apr. 2024 -; in leaf litter ( +; +in leaf litter +( Fig. 2E ); Jiaqi Zhao @@ -167,20 +167,16 @@ a.s.l. Songtao Shi & Xiaoru Qi -leg.; -Ps. -- +leg.; Ps.- MHBU-YN2024040101 . - + + Paratypes - - - CHINA • 1 ♂