diff --git a/data/4D/65/EA/4D65EAAAA9B454D0B433995B2131CB2D.xml b/data/4D/65/EA/4D65EAAAA9B454D0B433995B2131CB2D.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c8e2745c8e8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/4D/65/EA/4D65EAAAA9B454D0B433995B2131CB2D.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,700 @@
+
+
+
+Review of the wolf spider genus Halocosa Azarkina & Trilikauskas, 2019 from China (Araneae, Lycosidae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Wang, Lu-Yu
+0000-0002-5250-3473
+Key Laboratory of Eco-environments in Three Gorges Reservoir Region (Ministry of Education), School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Irfan, Muhammad
+0000-0003-0445-9612
+Key Laboratory of Eco-environments in Three Gorges Reservoir Region (Ministry of Education), School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Marusik, Yuri M.
+0000-0002-4499-5148
+College of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China & Institute for Biological Problems of the North RAS, Portovaya Str. 18, Magadan 685000, Russia & Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhang, Zhi-Sheng
+0000-0002-9304-1789
+Key Laboratory of Eco-environments in Three Gorges Reservoir Region (Ministry of Education), School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-11-19
+
+
+1218
+
+
+99
+111
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1218.137275
+556194B5-C6C1-46BA-8E4D-6BB94C51F7C4
+
+
+
+
+
+Halocosa hatanensis
+(
+Urita, Tang & Song, 1993
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+Figs 1 C, D
+,
+2 B, D, F, H
+,
+6
+,
+7
+,
+8
+,
+9 (哈腾盐狼蛛
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Pardosa hatanensis
+
+Urita, Tang & Song, 1993: 46
+, figs 1 A, B (
+holotype
+♂
+from Hatan Tohoi, Bayannur Meng,
+Inner Mongolia
+,
+China
+, deposited in Inner Magnolia Normal University, Hohhot,
+China
+, not examined).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Halocosa hatanensis
+
+
+:
+
+Azarkina and Trilikauskas 2019: 557
+
+(transferred from
+
+Pardosa
+
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Pardosa jartica
+
+Urita, Tang & Song, 1993: 47
+, figs 2 A, B (
+holotype
+♀
+from Jartai, Alxa Meng, Inner
+Mongolia China
+, deposited in Inner Magnolia Normal University, not examined). syn. nov.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Halocosa jartica
+
+
+:
+
+Azarkina and Trilikauskas 2019: 557
+
+(transferred from
+
+Pardosa
+
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Material examined.
+
+
+
+China
+:
+
+Xinjiang
+
+:
+1 ♀
+,
+Qiemo County
+,
+
+31 July 2006
+
+,
+F. Zhang
+leg.
+
+•
+
+1 ♂
+2 ♀
+,
+Korla City
+,
+Tashidian Town
+,
+
+25 May 2009
+
+,
+D. Sun
+and
+Y. W. Zhao
+leg.
+
+•
+
+2 ♀
+,
+Ruoqiang County
+,
+Taitema Lake
+,
+
+39°28.309′N
+,
+88°16.791′E
+
+,
+
+789 m
+
+,
+
+10 May 2013
+
+,
+L. Y. Wang
+leg.
+
+•
+
+1 ♂
+,
+Qiemo County
+,
+
+38°41.504′N
+,
+86°53.235′E
+
+,
+
+1029 m
+
+,
+
+10 May 2013
+
+,
+L. Y. Wang
+leg.
+
+•
+
+1 ♀
+,
+Yuli County
+,
+
+41°06.476′N
+,
+86°30.650′E
+
+,
+
+868 m
+
+,
+
+1 June 2014
+
+,
+L. Y. Wang
+and
+X. K. Jiang
+leg.
+
+•
+
+7 ♂
+4 ♀
+,
+Yuli County
+,
+
+40°43.939′N
+,
+87°20.139′E
+
+,
+
+863 m
+
+,
+
+1 June 2014
+
+,
+L. Y. Wang
+and
+X. K. Jiang
+leg.
+
+•
+
+1 ♂
+10 ♀
+,
+Ruoqiang County
+,
+Taitema Lake
+,
+
+39°28.309′N
+,
+88°16.791′E
+
+,
+
+789 m
+
+,
+
+1 June 2014
+
+,
+L. Y. Wang
+and
+X. K. Jiang
+leg.
+
+•
+
+3 ♂
+2 ♀
+,
+Qiemo County
+,
+
+38°41.536′N
+,
+86°53.263′E
+
+,
+
+1004 m
+
+,
+
+2 June 2014
+
+,
+L. Y. Wang
+and
+X. K. Jiang
+leg.
+
+•
+
+6 ♂
+,
+Qiemo County
+,
+Kalamilan River
+,
+
+37°57.796′N
+,
+84°26.794′E
+
+,
+
+1260 m
+
+,
+
+2 June 2014
+
+,
+L. Y. Wang
+&
+X. K. Jiang
+leg.
+
+•
+
+1 ♀
+,
+Yutian County
+,
+Keliya River
+,
+
+36°51.678′N
+,
+81°42.622′E
+
+,
+
+1382 m
+
+,
+
+3 June 2014
+
+,
+L. Y. Wang
+and
+X. K. Jiang
+leg.
+
+
+
+Qinghai
+
+:
+1 ♂
+,
+Geermu
+,
+15 Septemper 2002
+,
+M. S. Zhu
+leg.
+
+
+
+Inner Mongolia
+
+:
+3 ♂
+1 ♀
+,
+Alashanzuoqi
+,
+Jilantai (Jartai) Salt Lake
+,
+
+39°43.281′N
+,
+105°44.705′E
+
+,
+
+1017 m
+
+,
+
+7 June 2015
+
+,
+T. Lu
+and
+G. Q. Huang
+leg.
+
+•
+
+1 ♂
+2 ♀
+,
+Bayannur
+,
+Wulateqianqi
+,
+Eerdengbulage
+,
+Wuliangsuhai
+,
+
+40°51.577′N
+,
+108°50.906′E
+
+,
+
+1025 m
+
+,
+
+14 June 2015
+
+,
+T. Lu
+and
+G. Q. Huang
+leg.
+
+
+
+Ningxia
+
+:
+1 ♂
+1 ♀
+,
+Shizuishan City
+,
+Pingluo County
+,
+Sha Lake
+,
+
+38°47.890′N
+,
+106°20.934′E
+
+,
+
+1104 m
+
+,
+L. Y. Wang
+,
+H. Y. Liu
+and
+K. Yu
+leg.
+
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+This species is similar to
+
+H. cereipes
+(L.
+Koch, 1878
+)
+
+(Figs
+2 A, C, E, G
+,
+3
+–
+5
+), but differs by the tall and almost square tegular sclerite vs. dwarf in
+
+H. cereipes
+
+; the long and crooked terminal apophysis vs. short, strong and flat; the long and thin subterminal apophysis vs. wide and short; the bifurcate median apophysis, ventral branches curved, dorsal branch straight and pointed vs. not bifurcate, end bent to conductor (Figs
+2 H
+,
+6 A, B
+,
+7 C – F
+,
+8
+); the crack-shape copulatory openings and located below of the septum (vs. arc-shaped, located on the anterior position of the septum); and the width of spermathecal head almost the same as the width of spermathecal stalk (vs. width of spermathecal head greater than the width of spermathecal stalk) (Figs
+6 C, D
+,
+7 G, H
+).
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+
+
+Males
+total length 7.52–10.36.
+One male
+(Figs
+1 D
+,
+7 A
+, from Qiemo County) total length 7.52: carapace 3.84 long, 2.73 wide; opisthosoma 3.82 long, 2.04 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances:
+AME
+0.20,
+ALE
+0.14,
+PME
+0.36,
+PLE
+0.32;
+AME
+–
+AME
+0.13,
+AME
+–
+ALE
+0.05,
+PME
+–
+PME
+0.24,
+PME
+–
+PLE
+0.30. Clypeus height 0.18. Leg measurements: I 11.82 (3.20, 4.03, 2.73, 1.86); II 11.52 (3.18, 3.81, 2.66, 1.86); III 11.58 (3.04, 3.55, 3.24, 1.75); IV 15.84 (4.00, 4.74, 4.83, 2.23).
+
+
+Palp
+(Figs
+2 H
+,
+6 A, B
+,
+7 C – F
+,
+8
+). Cymbium c. 1.9 times longer than wide. The end of terminal apophysis curving, subterminal apophysis thin and membranous, shorter than the length of terminal apophysis. Median apophysis vertical and bifurcate, concave in lateral view. Tegular sclerite tall and almost square. Embolus long whip-like, smoothly rounded, slightly bent near tip, making almost whole circle, partly hidden by tegular ridge and median apophysis, base of embolus located in position of 2 o’clock. Conductor membranous.
+
+
+Females
+total length 8.01–13.21.
+One female
+(Figs
+1 C
+,
+7 B
+, from Qiemo County) total length 8.01: carapace 4.03 long, 2.75 wide; opisthosoma 4.04 long, 2.45 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances:
+AME
+0.23,
+ALE
+0.15,
+PME
+0.35,
+PLE
+0.32;
+AME
+–
+AME
+0.10,
+AME
+–
+ALE
+0.04,
+PME
+–
+PME
+0.27,
+PME
+–
+PLE
+0.32. Clypeus height 0.19. Leg measurements: I 10.74 (3.05, 3.66, 2.29, 1.74); II 10.25 (2.88, 3.50, 2.20, 1.67); III 10.60 (2.90, 3.41, 2.63, 1.66); IV 14.62 (3.76, 4.55, 4.30, 2.01).
+
+
+Epigyne
+(Figs
+6 C, D
+,
+7 G, H
+). Copulatory openings crack-shaped and located below of the septum. Spermathecal heads slightly inflated, approaching the anterior margins of spermathecal stalks. Spermathecal stalks as wide as heads. Accessorial gland arc-shaped, with a small and spherical head. Fertilization ducts small, crescent-shaped.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+China
+(
+Xinjiang
+,
+Qinghai
+,
+Ningxia
+and
+Inner Mongolia
+) (Fig.
+9
+).
+
+
+
+
+Remarks.
+
+
+Sample collected from the type locality of
+
+H. jartica
+
+contains specimens of both sexes. Comparison of these specimens with illustrations and descriptions of the
+
+H. jartica
+
+female and male of
+
+H. hatanensis
+
+reveals no differences, and therefore, we synonymized these names. The distance between the type localities is about
+140 km
+. Although two species were described in the same paper, we consider
+
+H. hatanensis
+
+as the senior synonym because of page priority, and also because males have more diagnostic characters than females.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/92/09/E2/9209E22E5BE6500C9863D8C00900C6F1.xml b/data/92/09/E2/9209E22E5BE6500C9863D8C00900C6F1.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..83989b93275
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/92/09/E2/9209E22E5BE6500C9863D8C00900C6F1.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,486 @@
+
+
+
+Review of the wolf spider genus Halocosa Azarkina & Trilikauskas, 2019 from China (Araneae, Lycosidae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Wang, Lu-Yu
+0000-0002-5250-3473
+Key Laboratory of Eco-environments in Three Gorges Reservoir Region (Ministry of Education), School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Irfan, Muhammad
+0000-0003-0445-9612
+Key Laboratory of Eco-environments in Three Gorges Reservoir Region (Ministry of Education), School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Marusik, Yuri M.
+0000-0002-4499-5148
+College of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China & Institute for Biological Problems of the North RAS, Portovaya Str. 18, Magadan 685000, Russia & Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhang, Zhi-Sheng
+0000-0002-9304-1789
+Key Laboratory of Eco-environments in Three Gorges Reservoir Region (Ministry of Education), School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-11-19
+
+
+1218
+
+
+99
+111
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1218.137275
+556194B5-C6C1-46BA-8E4D-6BB94C51F7C4
+
+
+
+
+
+Halocosa
+Azarkina & Trilikauskas, 2019
+
+
+
+
+
+Type species.
+
+
+
+Lycosa cereipes
+L.
+Koch, 1878
+
+from
+Turkmenistan
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+This genus resembles
+
+Xerolycosa
+Dahl, 1908
+
+, another genus within subfamily
+Evippinae
+. Species of both genera lack a transverse depression on the carapace (Fig.
+2 A, B
+), tibia I and II with three pairs of ventral spines (Fig.
+2 E, F
+), and male palps with a bifid terminal apophysis (Fig.
+2 G, H
+).
+
+Halocosa
+
+can be distinguished by the presence of three retromarginal cheliceral teeth in
+
+Halocosa
+
+(Fig.
+2 C, D
+; vs. with two teeth in
+
+Xerolycosa
+
+); embolus lacking accompanied membrane (Fig.
+2 C, D
+; vs. present in
+
+Xerolycosa
+
+); strong or small tegular sclerite, bifid terminal apophysis (anterior arm strong and sclerotized, posterior arm thin and membranous) in
+
+Halocosa
+
+(Figs
+3 A, B
+,
+4 C – F
+,
+5
+,
+6 A, B
+,
+7 E, F
+,
+8
+; vs. both are membranous in
+
+Xerolycosa
+
+); wide square or rectangular septum covering whole atrium in
+
+Halocosa
+
+(vs. pear-shaped, partly covering atrium in
+
+Xerolycosa
+
+); slit-like copulatory openings, presence of accessory tube-like glands in
+
+Halocosa
+
+(Figs
+3 C, D
+,
+4 G, H
+,
+6 C, D
+,
+7 G, H
+; vs. glands absent in
+
+Xerolycosa
+
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Halocosa
+spp.
+A, C, E, G
+
+
+Halocosa cereipes
+(L.
+Koch, 1878
+)
+
+B, D, F, H
+
+Halocosa hatanensis
+(
+Urita, Tang & Song, 1993
+)
+
+A, B
+carapace, lateral view
+C, D
+chelicerae, ventral view
+E, F
+tibia of leg I, ventral view
+G, H
+terminal apophysis and embolus, ventral view.
+
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+
+
+Medium sized (6.4–13.21) (
+Azarkina and Trilikauskas 2019
+) light colored. Carapace dirty brown with pattern formed by yellowish spots: butterfly like spot around fovea, pair of bean-shaped spots posteriorly from eye field and three pairs of marginal round spots; sternum brown; dorsum of abdomen with variegated pattern formed by numerous paired and unpaired spots on dirty brown background, venter uniformly yellow. Carapace very low (length / height ratio c. 4), furrow between cephalic and thoracic parts absent. Chelicera with three pro- and three retromarginal teeth. Leg formula: 4123 or 4132. Femora I – IV with three dorsal spines, patella with one dorsal, tibia and metatarsi III and IV with two dorsal spines (not indicated in tables). Within the intraspecific, the dorsal spines on tibia and metatarsus can be strong or weak, almost indistinguishable from large setae.
+
+
+Palp with droplet-shaped cymbium, subtegulum (
+St
+) small, placed on prolateral side; tegulum large, going rather high on prolateral side with long ridge (
+Tr
+) on prolateral side that hold and hide part of embolus (
+Em
+); retrolateral part of tegulum with extension directed anteriorly, terminating by conductor, median part with tegular sclerite (
+TS
+); seminal duct thin, with “ sharp ” loop (
+Sl
+) on prolateral half; median apophysis located closer to retrolateral part of tegulum, without extensions, inner side of median apophysis with kind of pocket (or furrow) (
+MA
+), that holds tip of embolus and seems to serve as functional conductor; in retrolateral view median apophysis concave; embolic division with large sharply pointed terminal apophysis (
+TA
+) accompanied by membranous subterminal apophysis (
+SA
+); embolus long whip-like, smoothly rounded, slightly bent near tip, making almost whole circle, partly hidden by tegular ridge and median apophysis, base of embolus located in position of 2 o’clock.
+
+
+Epigyne relatively small, one-fifth the width of the abdomen, densely covered with white setae to such extent that adult female could be considered as juvenile, especially in the field; fovea / atrium absent, totally covered with rectangular septum, septal stem absent, copulatory openings located in anterior part of epigynal plate, open into deep bulge which turns to wide, weakly sclerotized duct going straight down, near epigastral fold this duct turns up into strongly sclerotized, partly twisted, duct terminating by more or less clavate spermatheca; heavily sclerotized part of duct with finger-like or clavate accessorial gland (
+Ag
+).
+
+
+
+
+Relationships.
+
+
+Azarkina and Trilikauskas (2019)
+placed this genus in
+Lycosinae
+due to “ the latero-median origin of the embolus that is situated in a shallow and wide depression ”. This placement appears to be incorrect. All
+Lycosinae
+have palea (lacking in
+
+Halocosa
+
+), the median apophysis originates prolaterally and stretches horizontally (vs. originates retrolaterally and stretches parallel to cymbium axis), and the septum is not covered with setae (with exception of
+
+Arctosa
+
+) (vs. covered with setae). In addition, the carapace in
+
+Halocosa
+
+is very low, 3–4 times longer than high in comparison to
+Lycosinae
+(c. 2.4 longer than wide). To the best of our knowledge, the copulatory organs of this genus, as well as the flattened carapace, fit well with those known in
+Evippinae
+. Therefore, we consider
+
+Halocosa
+
+in
+Evippinae
+.
+
+
+
+
+Composition.
+
+
+Two species:
+
+H. cereipes
+(L.
+Koch, 1878
+)
+
+and
+
+H. hatanensis
+(
+Urita, Tang & Song, 1993
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Biology.
+
+
+
+Halocosa cereipes
+
+is a dweller of saline places. It was collected around salt lakes (
+Iran
+,
+Azerbaijan
+, around the Aral Sea), and on the low seashore in the Crimea (personal data). The same habitats were reported by
+Azarkina and Trilikauskas (2019)
+. Numerous spots on the carapace and abdomen, and leg annulation make the spiders very cryptic, and invisible if they are not moving.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+From southern
+Ukraine
+to western
+Inner Mongolia
+, south to
+Iran
+(
+Azarkina and Trilikauskas 2019
+;
+Nentwig et al. 2021
+). In
+China
+, known from
+Xinjiang
+,
+Ningxia
+,
+Qinghai
+and
+Inner Mongolia
+(present paper).
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file