From f06fa9d90fbd0bd9ab74ce2636c2c8cba375c8d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ggserver Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 12:35:51 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add updates up until 2024-10-03 12:31:47 --- .../0B/03800B62FFDE804821A6FBBDFECCF936.xml | 387 +++++++++++ .../0B/03800B62FFDF804E21E7FF76FE52F92C.xml | 219 +++++++ .../87/038687F1C333B85DFCB2D8333EEAFBFD.xml | 379 +++++++++++ .../9F/03A99F1D856D285CFE56FF2D1BC0FA0D.xml | 190 ++++++ .../9F/03A99F1D856D285FFE73FA6D18CCFCEF.xml | 159 +++++ .../87/03D48734FF99FFDFED3CFA452D8AFA62.xml | 620 ++++++++++++++++++ .../87/03D48734FF9FFFDDEFB8FA4428E2FA62.xml | 447 +++++++++++++ .../7E/D9267E79FF8A085BB6C3DFAF5B0EFE41.xml | 151 +++++ .../7E/D9267E79FF8B0859B684DFFE5BDFFC66.xml | 281 ++++++++ 9 files changed, 2833 insertions(+) create mode 100644 data/03/80/0B/03800B62FFDE804821A6FBBDFECCF936.xml create mode 100644 data/03/80/0B/03800B62FFDF804E21E7FF76FE52F92C.xml create mode 100644 data/03/86/87/038687F1C333B85DFCB2D8333EEAFBFD.xml create mode 100644 data/03/A9/9F/03A99F1D856D285CFE56FF2D1BC0FA0D.xml create mode 100644 data/03/A9/9F/03A99F1D856D285FFE73FA6D18CCFCEF.xml create mode 100644 data/03/D4/87/03D48734FF99FFDFED3CFA452D8AFA62.xml create mode 100644 data/03/D4/87/03D48734FF9FFFDDEFB8FA4428E2FA62.xml create mode 100644 data/D9/26/7E/D9267E79FF8A085BB6C3DFAF5B0EFE41.xml create mode 100644 data/D9/26/7E/D9267E79FF8B0859B684DFFE5BDFFC66.xml diff --git a/data/03/80/0B/03800B62FFDE804821A6FBBDFECCF936.xml b/data/03/80/0B/03800B62FFDE804821A6FBBDFECCF936.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c0b89a9cdca --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/80/0B/03800B62FFDE804821A6FBBDFECCF936.xml @@ -0,0 +1,387 @@ + + + +Two new Brazilian species of oil-collecting bees of the genus Centris (Ptilotopus) Klug (Hymenoptera: Apidae) + + + +Author + +Entomologia, Departamento de + + + +Author + +Nacional, Museu + + + +Author + +Quinta da Boa Vista, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. + + + +Author + +Cristóvão, São + + + +Author + +Janeiro, Rio de + + + +Author + +E-mail, Brasil. + +text + + +Revista Chilena de Entomología + + +2019 + +2019-02-22 + + +1 + + +79 +85 + + + +journal article +0718-8994 +BAE29AD1-A441-419F-9032-E014FE52AF4 + + + + + + +Centris +( +Ptilotopus +) +neglecta + + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 3-5 +) + + + + + + + +Centris +( +Ptilotopus +) +atra +Moure, 1995: 951 + + +. (Morphology, distribution (Partim)). + + +Silveira +et al +., 2002: 98 + + +. (List, distribution (Partim)). + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Integument and pubescence blackish ( +Figs. 3, 4 +). Clypeus areolate with central area of upper margin relatively bright, inpunctate, with very fine areolation, almost absent ( +Fig. 3 +). Dorsal surface of mesoscutellum with two elliptical, narrow, raised and well-defined glabrous area with lateroposterior margin with elevated ridge ( +Fig. 5 +). + + + + + +Description. +Holotype +female. + +Measurements (mm): +Approximately body length: 30.4. Head width: 9.7. Forewing length: 20.6. Mandible basal width: 2.3. Mandible length: 4.4. Escape length: 1.4. F1 length: 2.0. F2 length: F3 length: 0.5. DIS: 4.7. DII: 4.7. +Coloration: +Head black ( +Fig. 3 +), except malar area and center of mandible mahogany. Metepisternum, metanotum, and propodeum brown. Femora, sterna and T1 dark reddish brown. T2-T6 dark brown. Wings dark brown ( +Fig. 4 +) with greenish iridescence. Apex of fore and middle femora orange at sides. Central surface of internal half of tegula orange brown. +Pubescence: +Blackish, without yellow hairs on metasoma ( +Figs. 3, 4 +). +Integument and sculpture surface: +Clypeus strongly areolate, with coarse and dense punctation on periphery of disc; central area of upper margin relatively bright, impunctate, with very fine areolation, almost absent ( +Fig. 3 +). Labrum with coarse and very dense punctation. Posterior area of ocelli with short linear cavity projected backwards. Posterior area of ocelli with semicircular transversal linear cavity. Distal margin of T2-T4 smooth. +Structures: +Flabellum elliptical. Maxillary palpus with four palpomeres (relative lengths: 2 +nd +>3 +rd +>1 +st +>4 +th +). Mandible with three apically rounded teeth (relative lengths: 1 +st +>2 +nd +>3 +rd +) ( +Fig. 3 +). Apical tooth separated from the rest, with broad base ( +Fig. 3 +). Trimmal angle obtuse, almost absent. Acetabular carina reaching base of second tooth ( +Fig. 3 +). Labrum semicircular with well-developed central longitudinal carina. Clypeus convex, slightly concave near lower margin (lateral view). Vertex above the upper interocular tangent. Central area of epistomal suture straighter than central area of clypeal lower margin ( +Fig. 3 +). Occipital area well-developed, visible behind the eyes (frontal view) ( +Fig. 3 +). Pronotal lobe with acute projection. Hypoepimeral area with rounded tubercle. Mesoscutum with glabrous biconvex area on posterior half ( +Fig. 5 +). Mesoscutellum with two elliptical raised divergent posteriorly glabrous areas separated from each other, each with elevated ridge on lateroposterior margin ( +Fig. 5 +). Axilla raised and glabrous with relatively flat dorsal surface ( +Fig. 5 +). Tegula with a small rounded protuberance on central area of inner half. Primary anterior comb of fore elaiospathe starting below strigilis. Secondary comb formed by four giant apically curved hairs. Basitibial plate elliptical with abundant pilosity on disc, without secondary plate. Pygidial plate with rounded apex, with distal half slightly angled downwards (lateral view), without evident secondary plate. Claws with internal teeth, except hind leg. + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +female, with the following data label: + +Coleção +Campos Seabra + +\ +Brasil +Goiás +Minaçú + +V 1987 + +Monné +& +Roppa +\ Minaçú Go + +V. 1987 + +Monné Roppa + +. + +Paratypes +: +3 females +with the same data label of the +holotype +. All specimens were deposited at +MNRJ + +. + + + + +Etymology. +From Latin +neglectus +(neglected, ignored) due to the misidentification of the specimens of this species with + +Centris atra +Friese, 1899 + +(see below). + + + + +Distribution. +According to +Moure (1995) +and + +Silveira +et al +. (2002) + +, this species occurs in the states of +Goiás +, +Minas Gerais +and +Tocantins +. + + + + +Comments. +Among the specimens studied was observed only a small variation in the coloration of the pubescence of the mesosoma and legs probably due to conservation conditions. This new species is similar to + +C +. +moerens + +. Both are differentiated by the yellow pilosity on T1-T3 (absent in + +C +. +neglecta + +sp. nov. +( +Fig. 4 +), present in + +C +. +moerens + +), by the coloration of clypeus and mandible (mostly black in + +C +. +neglecta + +sp. nov. +( +Fig. 3 +) and reddish brown in + +C +. +moerens + +), by the curvature of the middle area of the upper and lower margins of clypeus (lower greater than upper in + +C +. +neglecta + +sp. nov. +( +Fig. 3 +) and relatively equal in + +C +. +moerens + +), and by the raised lateroposterior margin of glabrous areas of mesoscutellum (present in + +C +. +neglecta + +sp. nov. +( +Fig. 5 +) and absent in + +C +. +moerens + +( +Fig. 6 +)). + + + +Centris neglecta + +sp. nov. +could also be confused with + +C +. +maranhensis +Ducke, 1910 + +, especially with specimens of that species with reduced yellow pubescence on mesosoma and metasoma. Both species are differentiated by the central area of upper margin of clypeus (with fine or absent areolation in + +C +. +neglecta + +sp. nov. +( +Fig. 3 +), uniformly areolated as on the rest of clypeus in + +C +. +maranhensis + +) and by the coloration of tegula (dark brown to black with light brown spot at central area of inner half in + +C +. +neglecta + +sp. nov. +and uniformly dark brown to black in + +C +. +maranhensis + +). Additionally, in + +C +. +neglecta + +sp. nov. +the pubescence of mesosoma and metasoma is completely blackish ( +Fig. 4 +), while in + +C +. +maranhensis + +there are yellow hairs generally on mesepisternum, mesoscutellum and on lateral sides of T1 and T2. The male of this new species is unknown. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/80/0B/03800B62FFDF804E21E7FF76FE52F92C.xml b/data/03/80/0B/03800B62FFDF804E21E7FF76FE52F92C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fe3045a92ce --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/80/0B/03800B62FFDF804E21E7FF76FE52F92C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,219 @@ + + + +Two new Brazilian species of oil-collecting bees of the genus Centris (Ptilotopus) Klug (Hymenoptera: Apidae) + + + +Author + +Entomologia, Departamento de + + + +Author + +Nacional, Museu + + + +Author + +Quinta da Boa Vista, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. + + + +Author + +Cristóvão, São + + + +Author + +Janeiro, Rio de + + + +Author + +E-mail, Brasil. + +text + + +Revista Chilena de Entomología + + +2019 + +2019-02-22 + + +1 + + +79 +85 + + + +journal article +0718-8994 +BAE29AD1-A441-419F-9032-E014FE52AF4 + + + + + + +Centris +( +Ptilotopus +) +auriceps + + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 1, 2 +) + + + + +Diagnosis. +This new species is easily recognized by the yellowish coloration of clypeus and labrum, by the yellowish pubescence on T2 ( +Fig. 2 +) and the yellowish-orange hairs on head and fore legs that contrast with the brown pilosity on the rest of the body ( +Figs. 1, 2 +). + + + + + +Description. +Holotype +male. + +Measurements (mm): +Approximately body length: 25.1. Head width: 6.7. Forewing length: 20.1. Mandible basal width: 1.8. Mandible length: 3.4. Escape length: 1.0. F1 length: 1.6. F2 length: 3.5. F3 length: 4.5. UID: 2.7. DII: 3.4. +Coloration: +Integument of head in general dark brown, but mandible light brown with dark brown apex ( +Fig. 1 +). Labrum, clypeus, supraclypeal and paraocular areas yellowish ( +Fig. 1 +). Antenna brown, escape, pedicel and F1 slightly reddish brown. Forelegs and pronotal lobe light brown. Mesoscutum, mesoscutellum and tegula dark brown ( +Fig. 2 +). Hypoepimeral tubercle, metanotum, metepisternum and propodeum reddish brown. Middle and hind legs brown ( +Fig. 2 +). Terga and sterna brown with yellowish brown distal margin. Wings brown with slight violet iridescence ( +Fig. 2 +). +Pubescence: +Head and forelegs yellowish-orange ( +Figs. 1, 2 +). Mesosoma with brown hairs, slightly darker on mesoscutum and mesoscutellum ( +Fig. 2 +). Middle and hind legs with dark brown hairs ( +Fig. 2 +). Metasoma with brown hairs, similar to those on mesoscutum, except T2 with yellowish hairs ( +Fig. 2 +). +Integument and sculpture surface: +Labrum with fine areolation, almost absent, with coarse and relatively scattered punctation, with a narrow and not well-defined smooth longitudinal area. Clypeus strongly areolate and with fine and dense punctation, coarser and scattered towards the lateral sides. Distal margin of terga and sterna smooth. +Structures: +Maxillary palpus with five palpomeres (relative lengths: 2 +nd +>3 +rd +>1 +st +>4 +th +≈5 +th +). Mandible with three apically acute teeth, except second widely rounded (relative lengths: 1 +st +>2 +nd +>3 +rd +) ( +Fig. 1 +). Apical tooth widely separated from the others ( +Fig. 1 +). Third tooth with apex directed upwards. Trimmal angle absent. Acetabular carina reaching the base of second tooth ( +Fig. 1 +). Labrum relatively semicircular, without longitudinal carina ( +Fig. 1 +). Clypeus convex (lateral view) and with concave upper half (dorsal view). Central area of epistomal suture slightly more convex than central area of clypeal lower margin ( +Fig. 1 +). Inner orbits of compound eyes slightly diverging downwards ( +Fig. 1 +). Occipital area not visible behind the eyes (frontal view) ( +Fig. 1 +). Vertex slightly above the upper orbital tangent. External lateral area of lateral ocelli with a deep longitudinal cavity directed backwards. Pronotal lobe rounded. Mesoscutum without glabrous area on posterior half. Mesoscutellum with two rounded glabrous protuberances. Axilla raised, rounded and glabrous. Tegula with a small rounded protuberance on central inner side. Hypoepimeral area with relatively acute protuberance. Claws with well-developed internal tooth. + + + + +Type specimen. + +Holotype +male, with the following data label: Coleção +Campos Seabra +\ Cachimbo +Pará +- +Brasil +julho 1955 +F. M. Oliveira +( +MNRJ +). + + + + + +Etymology. +From Latin +aureus +(golden) and +ceps +(head) due to the yellowish-orange pubescence on head. + + + + +Distribution. +The distribution of this new species remains restricted to Cachimbo, in the Amazonian state of +Pará +, northern +Brazil +. + + + + +Comments. +This species exhibits a unique pattern of coloration of pilosity that makes it easily recognized and unmistakable between the species of + +Centris +( +Ptilotopus +) + +. The female of this new species is unknown. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/86/87/038687F1C333B85DFCB2D8333EEAFBFD.xml b/data/03/86/87/038687F1C333B85DFCB2D8333EEAFBFD.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..118d9409e2a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/86/87/038687F1C333B85DFCB2D8333EEAFBFD.xml @@ -0,0 +1,379 @@ + + + +Redescription of a little-known species, Cryptocephalus surdus Rapilly, 1980 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae), with notes on new distribution localities and habitat preference in Türkiye + + + +Author + +Gök, Ali +Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey + + + +Author + +Hasbenli, Abdullah +Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey + + + +Author + +Şen, İsmail +Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Isparta University of Applied Science, Isparta, Turkey + +text + + +Turkish Journal of Zoology + + +2023 + +2022-12-02 + + +47 + + +1 + + +53 +55 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.55730/1300-0179.3113 + +journal article +10.55730/1300-0179.3113 +1303-6114 +13229515 + + + + + + +Cryptocephalus surdus +Rapilly, 1980 + + + + + + +Specimens examined: + +Isparta +, +Eğirdir +, +Aşağı Gökdere village +, + +380 m + +, + +20.08.2006 + +, +1 ♂ + +; + + +27.08.2006 + +1 ♂ +, leg. +İ. Şen + +; + +Konya +, +Hadim +, +Beyreli village +, + +1577 m + +, + +06.07.2006 + +2♂♂ +, +2♀♀ +leg. +A. Hasbenli + +; + +İçel +, +Mezitli +, +Zeybekler village +, + +1298 m + +, + +23.04.2006 + +1♂ +leg. +A. Hasbenli + +; + +Adana +, +Pozantı Akçatekir village +, +Karboğazı +plateau, + +1611 m + +, + +27.06.2007 + +1♂ +leg. +A. Hasbenli + +; + +Adana +, +Pozantı Akçatekir village +, +Karboğazı +plateau, + +1678 m + +, + +29.06.2007 + +1♀ +leg. +A. Hasbenli. + + + + + +Redescription of male +( +Figures 1a and 1b +) + + +Total body length: +3.7 mm +. ( +Figure 1a +). + + +* Correspondence: aligok32@gmail.com + + +Head +. Vertex brownish, frons and genae yellow with dense, fine, and irregular punctures. Eyes reniform. Clypeus light yellow, maxillary palpi brownish. Clypeus and labrum sparsely covered with very short pale setae.First antennomere yellowish, antennomeres II-IV light brown, the remaining segments black. Antennomeres covered sparsely with pale setae. Antennal length ratio: 20:9:12:13:8:19:19:18:18:17:18. + + +Pronotum +. Convex, transverse, approximately 1.7 times as broad as its length, broadest at base, conical with almost straight side margins. The pronotum generally yellow, with slightly darkened areas (slightly brownish) on the anterior, posterior, and lateral parts of the disc. The surface with dense, fine, and irregular punctures. Posterior margin of pronotum with a black toothed and a lengthwise thin, black stripe. + + +Scutellum +. Scutellum as long as wide, triangular, with truncate apex, smooth, glabrous, yellow; all sides with a brown stripe. + + +Elytra +. 2.3 times as long as pronotum. Elytra yellow with coarse and regular puncture rows. Basal margin of elytra with slightly thin, dark brown stripe. Humeral callus raised, with very light brownish spot. + + +Venter. +Yellow, mesosternum partly dark brown, Venter sparsely covered with thin, white hairs. + + +Legs. +Legs completely yellow, tarsal segments dark brown in all legs. + + +Abdomen +. Yellow, impunctate, sparsely covered with thin, white hairs. + + +Aedeagus. +Triangle at apex in dorsal view, strongly curved in lateral view, laterally deep grooves at apex in ventral view ( +Figure 1b +). + + +Female. +Total body length: +4.8 mm +. Females are larger than males, generally very similar to the male except for the whole body length. + + +Spermatheca. +Sickle shaped, ductus very long and conspicuously coiled ( +Figure 1c +). + + +Variations. +Total body length: +3.6–4.9 mm +, the color of the vertex of the head varies from light brown to dark brown. The area between the eyes is dark yellow in some specimens. The pronotal pattern of both males and females is quite variable. While the pronotal patterns are very prominently seen in some specimens, they are not clear in some specimens. The color of the legs varies from yellow to brown. Although the tarsal segments are generally dark brownish in males and females, they are completely yellow in +two female +specimens. + + + + +Phenology. +It seems that adults are active between April and August, but the active period of adults can change probably according to the elevation and climatic conditions of the areas. + + + + +Distribution. +The species is so far only known from +Isparta +and +Diyarbakır +provinces in +Türkiye +. The present records are the first one from +Konya +, +Mersin +, and +Adana +provinces ( +Figure 2 +). + + +Bionomy. +According +to observations in +Isparta +, the specimens were collected from willow ( + +Salix caprea + +) trees growing by the creek in the close vicinity of +Aşağı Gökdere village +( +Isparta Province +, +Eğirdir +) at an altitude of + + +380 m + +. + +The area +can be characterized as riparian habitat, consisting of willow and poplar trees. The sampling area has typical Mediterranean climate features. + + + +Cryptocephalus surdus + +and + +C. sulphureus +Olivier, 1808 + +very closely resemble each other in terms of the upper side patterns and coloration. However, they can be easily distinguished from each other by aedeagus and spermatheca structures ( +Rapilly, 1980 +). In the present study, some variations on the patterns of head, pronotum, and elytra, which are not included in the original description, are presented (see variation section). Also, it draws attention that these two close species are distributed allopatrically. + +C. sulphureus + +occurs in Western Asia while + +C. surdus + +is distributed in the western part of Mediterranean area. + + + +Figure 1. + +Cryptocephalus surdus +Rapilly, 1980 + +. a. Habitus (male) Scale bars = 1 mm; b. + +Aedeagus; dorsal and lateral view. Scale bars = 0.5 mm; c. Spermatheca. + + + +Figure 2. +Map showing the previous and new distribution localities of + +Cryptocephalus surdus + +. + + + +As far as we know, there are only two distributional records ( +Isparta +and +Diyarbakır +provinces) in +Türkiye +of the species up to now. The new distribution records obtained from this study show that the distributional areas of the species were along the ridges of the Taurus Mountains in +Konya +, +Mersin +, and +Adana +provinces in +Türkiye +. These records show that the species may actually be distributed more widely along with the Taurus Mountain chains ( +Figure 2 +). However, additional records are needed to present the exact distributional range of this species in +Türkiye +. + + +Present + +records show that the adults of the species are active between +<author id="5392DE02C331B85DFC4DDD23398DFC9E" box="[990,1193,785,810]" fns="*" inm="true" npo="*" pageId="3" pageNumber="55">April and August</author> + +. In +the original description of the species +, the specimens from Iran were collected in June at + +1750 +m + +. Surprisingly, all of the records except Isparta Province are at relatively high altitudes. This situation shows that phenology of the adults can change according to the elevation and climate of the areas. Considering the general distribution areas in Türkiye, it can be concluded that the species is distributed in areas showing transition to Mediterranean climate and continental climate. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/A9/9F/03A99F1D856D285CFE56FF2D1BC0FA0D.xml b/data/03/A9/9F/03A99F1D856D285CFE56FF2D1BC0FA0D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4f7cdb6f272 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/A9/9F/03A99F1D856D285CFE56FF2D1BC0FA0D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,190 @@ + + + +Nuevas especies del género Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilinae) del Estado de Paraná, Brasil + + + +Author + +Curletti, Gianfranco +y Cristian Pineda & Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Parco Cascina Vigna, 10022 Carmagnola, Italia. E-mail: giancurletti @ gmail. com & Avenida El Litre N ° 1310, Valparaíso, Chile. E-mail: cristian. pineda. r @ gmail. com + + + +Author + +Vigna, Parco Cascina + + + +Author + +E-mail, Italia. + + + +Author + +E-mail, Chile. + +text + + +Revista Chilena de Entomología + + +2018 + +44 + + +1 + + +5 +8 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.13885412 +0718-8994 +13885412 +ACC8882F-5EFF-4F39-B260-76FF7D52EB94 + + + + + + +Agrilus +( +Agrilus +) +barrosi + + +nov. sp. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 1-3 +) + + + + +Material tipo. + +Holotipo +hembra en +MZUEL +, etiquetado: a) “ +Brasil +, +Estado de Paraná +, +Londrina +, Parque Estadual +Mata dos Godoy +, + +02.XI.2016 + +, trampa de luz, +M.G. Fonseca +y +R +. +C. Barros +leg.” [etiqueta blanca impresa], b) “ + +Agrilus +( +Agrilus +) +barrosi +Curletti y Pineda + +, +holotipo +hembra” [etiqueta blanca con borde rojo] + +. + + + + +Diagnosis. +Los caracteres morfológicos externos que caracterizan a + +Agrilus barrosi + +nov. sp. +, son principalmente la coloración, pubescencia elitral y la forma del ápice elitral. Pocas especies neotropicales tienen el ápice elitral provisto de espinas, pubescencia perisutural limitada a la mitad posterior y manchas de pubescencia en la mitad anterior. En +Brasil +, sólo + +A. josei +Obenberger, 1935 + +comparte estas caracterÍsticas, pero es completamente de color verde y tiene dimensiones mucho mayores. En +Guyana +Francesa + +A. longelineatus +Curletti y Brûlé, 2011 + +y + +A. emicyaneus +Curletti y Brûlé, 2016 + +, además de compartir las caracterÍsticas antes mencionadas, también tienen el pronoto azul y los élitros bronceados. + +Agrilus barrosi + +nov. sp. +, se diferencia de ambas especies por la cabeza más hemisférica, la escultura del pronoto compuesta por estrÍas transversales más sutiles y numerosas, la pubescencia amarilla del mesosterno y por la pubescencia más extensa en la base de la frente. + + + +Descripción +holotipo +hembra. + +Largo +8,1 mm +. Élitros bronceados, pronoto azul oscuro y cabeza roja. +Cabeza: +Redondeada. Vértex 1/4 del ancho del margen anterior del pronoto. Frente rojo cobre, con pubescencia blanca distribuida regularmente sólo en la base. Presencia de una carena transversal que divide la frente del clÍpeo. Antenas dentadas a partir del cuarto segmento. +Tórax: +Pronoto estrecho, ligeramente redondeado en los costados, con ángulos posteriores agudos. Carinula premarginal entera y unida al margen lateral en la parte anterior. Carena marginal separada de la base. Mentonera con margen anterior regularmente redondeado. Placa prosternal paralela. Escutelo carenado. +Élitros: +Elongados, estrechos, con ápices provistos de espinas. Pubescencia ( +Fig. 1 +) dispuesta en lÍnea a lo largo de la sutura en la parte distal. En la base se presenta en forma de dos pares de manchas ubicadas a la altura del callo humeral y en 2/5 de la longitud, combinado con algunas setas dispersas a lo largo de la sutura. +Abdomen: +Bronce oscuro. Pubescencia blanca inconspicua dispuesta a los lados de los ventritos abdominales. MesoepÍmero y mesoanepisterno con pubescencia mucho más notoria de color rojo ocre. Laterotergitos con pubescencia blanca uniforme. +Patas: +Con garras internas más cortas que las externas. Metatarso más corto que la metatibia. Primer segmento del metatarso más largo que la suma de los tres siguientes (1>2+3+4). + + +Etimología. + +Nombre +específico dedicado al entomólogo brasileño +Rafael Campos de Barros +, quien recolectó el ejemplar designado +holotipo + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/A9/9F/03A99F1D856D285FFE73FA6D18CCFCEF.xml b/data/03/A9/9F/03A99F1D856D285FFE73FA6D18CCFCEF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a33a2397a88 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/A9/9F/03A99F1D856D285FFE73FA6D18CCFCEF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,159 @@ + + + +Nuevas especies del género Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilinae) del Estado de Paraná, Brasil + + + +Author + +Curletti, Gianfranco +y Cristian Pineda & Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Parco Cascina Vigna, 10022 Carmagnola, Italia. E-mail: giancurletti @ gmail. com & Avenida El Litre N ° 1310, Valparaíso, Chile. E-mail: cristian. pineda. r @ gmail. com + + + +Author + +Vigna, Parco Cascina + + + +Author + +E-mail, Italia. + + + +Author + +E-mail, Chile. + +text + + +Revista Chilena de Entomología + + +2018 + +44 + + +1 + + +5 +8 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.13885412 +0718-8994 +13885412 +ACC8882F-5EFF-4F39-B260-76FF7D52EB94 + + + + + + +Agrilus (Agrilus) adamanteus + + +nov. sp. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 4-6 +) + + + + +Material tipo. + +Holotipo +hembra en +MZUEL +, etiquetado: a) “ +Brasil +, +Estado de Paraná +, +Londrina +, Parque Estadual +Mata dos Godoy +, + +05.XII.2016 + +, trampa Malaise, +R +. +C. Barros +leg.” [ +Etiqueta +blanca impresa], b) “ + +Agrilus (Agrilus) adamanteus +Curletti y Pineda, +Holotipo + +hembra” [ +Etiqueta +blanca con borde rojo] + +. + + + + +Diagnosis. +La presencia de carinula premarginal entera y la pruinosidad de las manchas en los élitros ubican a + +Agrilus adamanteus + +nov. sp. +, morfológicamente cercano a + +A. sigillum +Curletti y Brûlé, 2013 + +de +Guyana +Francesa. El nuevo taxón se distingue principalmente por la forma más robusta, la cabeza aplanada en vista dorsal, el borde anterior del pronoto menos avanzado entre los ojos, los ángulos posteriores del pronoto agudos y por el ápice elitral cóncavo. + + + +Descripción +holotipo +hembra. + +Largo +6,5 mm +. Color dorsal negro. Pubescencia pruinosa, espesa, de color amarillo pálido, notoriamente cubriendo el tegumento. Dispuesta centralmente en la base de la frente, a los lados del pronoto, en forma de tres pares de puntos redondeados en los élitros, en el laterotergito basal, en forma alargada en la parte mediana del ventrito basal, a los lados del segundo ventrito, en el mesoepÍmero y en el mesoanepisterno. +Cabeza: +Ligeramente cóncava, de color bronce. Vértex ancho, 1/2 del ancho del margen anterior del pronoto. Antenas dentadas desde el cuarto segmento. +Tórax: +Pronoto poco alargado, subcuadrado, con márgenes laterales ligeramente arqueados y ángulos basales rectos. Carinula premarginal entera. Carena marginal separada de la base. Mentonera con margen anterior levemente sinuado. Proceso prosternal paralelo. Escutelo carenado. +Élitros: +Con ápice formado por una leve escotadura delimitada por dos espinas cortas. +Abdomen: +Negro. Último ventrito abdominal visible con margen apical entero (liso). +Patas: +Con todas las garras bífidas. Primer segmento del metatarso tan largo como la suma de los tres siguientes (1=2+3+4). + + +Etimología. +El nombre específico deriva del latín +adămas +(diamante), y hace referencia a la forma de las manchas elitrales. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/D4/87/03D48734FF99FFDFED3CFA452D8AFA62.xml b/data/03/D4/87/03D48734FF99FFDFED3CFA452D8AFA62.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a814a7da851 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/D4/87/03D48734FF99FFDFED3CFA452D8AFA62.xml @@ -0,0 +1,620 @@ + + + +Taxonomic Revision of Cirrodrilus makinoi (Annelida: Clitellata: Branchiobdellida) with a Redescription of C. homodontus + + + +Author + +Ohtaka, Akifumi +Faculty of Education, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Aomori 036 - 8560, Japan E-mail: ohtaka @ hirosaki-u. ac. jp & Present address: Fujimidai, Hirosaki, Aomori 036 - 8143, Japan & Corresponding author +ohtaka@hirosaki-u.ac.jp + + + +Author + +Konno, Tomoaki +Graduate School of Environmental Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060 - 0810, Japan + + + +Author + +Gelder, Stuart R. +Department of Science, University of Maine at Presque Isle, Maine 04769, USA + +text + + +Species Diversity + + +2024 + +2024-02-01 + + +29 + + +1 + + +43 +51 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.12782/specdiv.29.43 + +journal article +10.12782/specdiv.29.43 +2189-7301 +10834463 + + + + + +Cirrodrilus makinoi + +( + +Yamaguchi +, 1934 + +) [Japanese name: Hime-zariganimimizu ( + +Yamaguchi +1935a + +)] ( +Figs 2–4 +) + + + + + +Stephanodrilus +( +Stephanodrilus +) +makinoi + + +Yamaguchi +, 1934: 201 + +, fig. 10, pl. 13, fig. 5; + +Yamaguchi +1935a: 24 + +, fig. 12–2; + +Yamaguchi +1935b: 14 + +, fig. 4C. + + + +Stephanodrilus makinoi + +: + +Yamaguchi +1954: 102 + +. + + + +Cirrodrilus makinoi + +: +Timm 1991: 329 +, fig. 46; +Gelder 1996: 658 +; +Gelder and Ohtaka 2002: 338 +; +Ohtaka 2010: 460 +; +Gelder 2019: 489 +; +Ohtaka et al. 2020: 160 +. + + + +Cirrodrilus tsugarensis +Gelder and Ohtaka, 2000: 634 + +, fig. 1; +Ohtaka 2010: 460 +; +Ohtaka and Gelder 2015: 70 +, fig. 3D–F; +Gelder 2019: 489 +; Ohtaka et al. 2023: 27, figs 3, 4J. syn. nov. + + + + +Type material. + +Yamaguchi +(1934) + +did not designate any type specimens for + +C. makinoi + +. Six whole-mounted specimens identified in the ICHUM collection ( +Gelder and Ohtaka 2002 +) were thus deemed to be +syntypes +for + +C. makinoi + +by +Ohtaka et al. (2020) +, but these slide-mounted specimens had no labels and the catalogue information is believed lost. +According +to + +Yamaguchi +(1934) + +, therefore, the type locality of this species can be determined as somewhere, i.e., “Soranuma, Hattaribetsu, Shimofurano, Makomanai, Muroran, [or] +Shintoku +,” in +Hokkaido +. + + +Material examined. + +All six +syntype +specimens of + +C + +. makinoi +mentioned above: ICHUM-1402, 1404–1406, 1408, 1409. ICHUM-8591, a whole-mounted specimen of + +C. +makinoi + +from +Samani +, +Hokkaido +( +42.11°N +, +142.99°E +; No. +9 in +Fig. 1 +), + +2 October 2020 + +, coll. +T. Konno +. +ICHUM-8592 +, + + +a whole-mounted +specimen +of + +C. +makinoi + +from +Esashi +, +Hokkaido +( +45.05°N +, +142.50°E +; No. 8), + +18 October 2020 + +, coll. +T. Konno +. +ICHUM-8593 +, + + +a whole-mounted +specimen +of + +C. +tsugarensis + +from +Jōzankei +, +Sapporo +, +Hokkaido +( +42.96°N +, +141.22°E +; No. 7), + +31 August 2016 + +, coll. +A. Ohtaka +and +I. Koizumi +. +ICHUM-8594–8596 + +and an additional + +15 +whole-mounted specimens from Imabetsu, +Aomori Prefecture +, where is the type locality of + +C. +tsugarensis + +( +41.22°N +, +140.56°E +; No. 6), + +9 September 1997 + +, + +14 November 1997 + +, + +24 October 2010 + +, + +28 October 2017 + +, coll. +A. Ohtaka +. + +All +the specimens were removed from + +Ca + +. japonicus. + + + + +Description. +Body terete to pyriform, 2.0 to 3.0 mm long alive, 1.0– +1.5 mm +preserved ( +Fig. 2A +). Dorsal segmental appendage absent. Anterior nephridial pores opening separately onto the dorso-lateral surface of segment 3. Head slightly broader than segment 1 and posterior attachment disc. Peristomium shorter than head, and almost as wide as segment 1. Peristomium with five tentacles on dorsal lip, three pairs of lateral tentacles and small ventral lip ( +Fig. 2B +). Among five dorsal tentacles, median one sometimes slightly shorter than others. Lateral tentacles slightly shorter than dorsal tentacles. Ventral lip with a medial emargination and with or without a pair of small lobes laterally. Dorsal and ventral jaws similar in shape and size, 23.0–35.0 µm wide at the base, each with large medial tooth on the anterior margin and two to four pairs of small lateral teeth on anterior surface ( +Fig. 2C +); dental formula from 7/6 (3-1-3/2-1-3) to 8/8 (4-1-4/4-1-4). Small teeth pointed, each with angular ridge parallel to the median axes ( +Fig. 2D +); the median pair of small teeth located at base of large median tooth, smaller than lateral small teeth. Most male reproductive organs located in segment 6 ( +Fig. 2E +). Glandular atrium tubular, convoluted, consisted of dilated ental and slender ectal parts, total length 1.5–2.0 times segment diameter. Muscular atrium tubular, as thick as ectal part of glandular atrium, length about half segment diameter. Bursa ovoid, about quarter segment diameter. Spermatheca located in segment 5 ( +Fig. 2E +), length 1.0–1.3 times segment diameter; ovoid spermathecal bulb, without ental process and tubular duct with dilated ental half. + + +Variations. +Although five dorsal tentacles and three pairs of lateral tentacles on the peristomium were found in the specimens examined, length of their tentacles varied considerably. According to the original description of + +C. makinoi + +by + +Yamaguchi +(1934) + +, among five dorsal tentacles four are paired and sub-equal in length and slightly longer than the median one ( +Fig. 3A +). The shorter median tentacle was found in the +syntype +ICHUM-1402 ( +Fig. 3B +) as well as +topotypes +of + +C. tsugarensis + +from Imabetsu ( +Fig. 3E +). On the other hand, five dorsal tentacles of subequal lengths were also encountered both in +syntypes +(ICHUM-1405, 1406; +Fig. 3C, D +) and the Samani and Esashi specimens of + +C. makinoi + +and a specimen of + +C. tsugarensis + +from Sapporo ( +Fig. 3F +). Lengths of the lateral tentacles, especially in the most ventral pair, are usually shorter than the dorsal ones. Size of the ventral lip varied, and when contracted a pair or a single lateral small lobe ( +Fig. 3D +) may be visible, but usually they are absent ( +Fig. 3F +). Similarly, the median emargination ranges from distinct (arrowed in +Fig. 3A–E +) to almost indistinguishable ( +Fig. 3F +). + + + +Fig. 2. + +Cirrodrilus makinoi + +. A, Lateral view of a whole specimen, +Yamaguchi (1934 +: fig. 10A) was redrawn; B, ventral view of peristomium, a whole-mounted specimen from Imabetsu; C, anterior view of the ventral jaw in whole-mounted syntype (ICHUM-1405) of + +C. makinoi + +; D, lateral view of the dorsal jaw in a whole-mounted specimen from Imabetsu; E, lateral view of segment 5 (left) with the spermatheca and male genitalia in segment 6 (right), a whole-mounted specimen from Imabetsu, +Gelder and Ohtaka (2000 +: fig. 1E) was redrawn, scale bar = 50µm. Abbreviations: b, bursa; ga, glandular atrium; ma, muscular atrium; mt, median tooth; sb, spermathecal bulb; sd, spermathecal duct; st, small tooth; vd, vas deferens. Scale bars: A, 200µm; B, E, 50 µm; C, 10 µm. + + + + +Fig. 3. Ventral views showing variations in the form of peristomia in + +Cirrodrilus makinoi + +, and including those of the junior synonym + +C. tsugarensis + +. A, Figure in the original description of + +C. makinoi + +, +Yamaguchi (1934 +: fig. 10D) was redrawn; B–D, ICHUM-1402, 1405, 1406, syntypes of + +C. makinoi +, + +whole-mounted specimens; E, a whole-mounted topotype of + +C. tsugarensis + +from Imabetsu; F, ICHUM-8593, a wholemounted specimen of + +C. tsugarensis + +from Sapporo, Ohtaka et al. (2023: fig. 3A) was redrawn. Downward and upward arrows indicate the position on the dorsal and ventral median lines, respectively. Scale bar: 50µm. + + + + +Fig. 4. Variations in the anterior views of jaws in + +Cirrodrilus makinoi + +, including those of the junior synonym + +C. tsugarensis + +. A, Original figure of + +C. makinoi + +, +Yamaguchi (1934 +: fig. 10B) was redrawn; B, ICHUM-8591 from Samani; C, ICHUM-1404, a syntype of + +C. makinoi + +; D, another jaw in ICHUM-1404; E, ICHUM-8595, a topotype of + +C. tsugarensis + +from Imabetsu; F, another topotype of + +C. tsugarensis + +from Imabetsu. Scale bar: 10µm. + + + +Width +of the dorsal and ventral jaws ranged from 26.0 µm to 29.0 µm (N = 8, mean value 27.1 µm) in the +four syntype specimens +of + +C + +. makinoi +(ICHUM-1402, 1406, 1408, 1409). +Those +in the newly collected specimens of + +C + +. +makinoi +from +Samani +and +Esashi +, +Hokkaido +ranged from 27.0 µm to 32.0 µm, those in the specimen of + +C + +. +tsugarensis +from +Sapporo +, +Hokkaido +, were 30.0 µm and 32.0 µm, and the 18 +topotypes +of + +C + +. +tsugarensis +from +Imabetsu +, +Honshu +, ranged from 23.0 µm to 35.0 µm (N = 35, mean value 27.9 µm). + +Yamaguchi +(1934: 202) + +drew a jaw and gave its magnification as ×440, and from the reprint fig. 10B in the work, its width was calculated, 34 µm wide. +Although +the calculated jaw width in the original figure ( + +Yamaguchi +1934 + +) is slightly larger than those measured in the +syntypes +and +other specimens +from +Hokkaido +and +Honshu +localities, the difference is not significant. + + +The dental formula varies from 7/6 (3-1-3/2-1-3) to 9/9 (4-1-4/4-1-4). Although four pairs of lateral small teeth were drawn in the original figure ( +Fig. 4A +) and found subsequently in our new material ( +Fig. 4B +), jaws with fewer small teeth were observed more frequently. Twelve jaws in the +six syntypes +of + +C. makinoi + +showed a previously unreported variation in dental formula with a 3-1-3 arrangement ( +Fig. 2C +) occurring most frequently in 7 jaws (58%), followed by four jaws with 4-1-3 (33%; +Fig. 4C +). A unique arrangement of 2-2-2 ( +Fig. 4D +) was found in a jaw in the +syntype +of + +C. makinoi + +(ICHUM-1404). In the 22 jaws in the 11 +topotypes +of + +C. tsugarensis + +from Imabetsu, Honshu, the dental formula with 3-1-3 ( +Fig. 4E +) was the most frequently observed (16 jaws = 73%), followed by 3-1-2 ( +Fig. 4F +) or 3-1-4 with three jaws of each arrangement (6 jaws = 27%). + + + + +Distribution. + +Yamaguchi +(1934) + +reported under the name of + +Stephanodrilus +( +S. +) +makinoi + +(Nos +1–5 in +Fig. 1 +) five localities on +Hokkaido +, while +Gelder and Ohtaka (2000) +and Ohtaka et al. (2023) recorded one each on Honshu (No. 6) and +Hokkaido +(No. 7) under the name of + +C. tsugarensis +. + +Specimens used in the present study were collected from two additional localities on +Hokkaido +(Nos 8 and 9). In compiling these records, + +C. makinoi + +is shown to be widely distributed in +Hokkaido +along with an area on Honshu Island. + + + + +Host. + +Cambaroides japonicus +(De Haan, 1841) + +, the “Japanese crayfish” or “Nihon-zarigani” in Japanese. + + +Habitat. +Specimens have been observed alive on all parts of the exposed host’s surface. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/D4/87/03D48734FF9FFFDDEFB8FA4428E2FA62.xml b/data/03/D4/87/03D48734FF9FFFDDEFB8FA4428E2FA62.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c08ca0cdede --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/D4/87/03D48734FF9FFFDDEFB8FA4428E2FA62.xml @@ -0,0 +1,447 @@ + + + +Taxonomic Revision of Cirrodrilus makinoi (Annelida: Clitellata: Branchiobdellida) with a Redescription of C. homodontus + + + +Author + +Ohtaka, Akifumi +Faculty of Education, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Aomori 036 - 8560, Japan E-mail: ohtaka @ hirosaki-u. ac. jp & Present address: Fujimidai, Hirosaki, Aomori 036 - 8143, Japan & Corresponding author +ohtaka@hirosaki-u.ac.jp + + + +Author + +Konno, Tomoaki +Graduate School of Environmental Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060 - 0810, Japan + + + +Author + +Gelder, Stuart R. +Department of Science, University of Maine at Presque Isle, Maine 04769, USA + +text + + +Species Diversity + + +2024 + +2024-02-01 + + +29 + + +1 + + +43 +51 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.12782/specdiv.29.43 + +journal article +10.12782/specdiv.29.43 +2189-7301 +10834463 + + + + + +Cirrodrilus homodontus + +( + +Yamaguchi +, 1932b + +) [Japanese name: Hoso-zariganimimizu ( + +Yamaguchi +1935a + +)] ( +Fig. 5 +) + + + + + +Cambarincola homodonta + + +Yamaguchi +, 1932b: 454 + +, fig. 1. + + + +Stephanodrilus +( +Stephanodrilus +) +homodontus + +: + +Yamaguchi +1934: 200 + +; + +Yamaguchi +1935a: 24 + +, fig. 12-1; + +Yamaguchi +1935b: 13 + +, fig. 3–5. + + + +Stephanodrilus homodontus + +: + +Yamaguchi +1954: 101 + +. + + + +Cirrodrilus homodontus + +: +Timm 1991: 329 +, fig. 46; +Gelder 1996: 658 +; +Gelder and Ohtaka 2002: 338 +; +Ohtaka 2010: 460 +, fig. 12C; +Gelder 2019: 489 +; +Ohtaka et al. 2020: 180 +; Ohtaka et al. 2023: 29, fig. 4G. + + + + +Type material. + +Yamaguchi +(1932b) + +did not designate any type specimens but stated + +C. +homodontus + +were collected from +Soranuma +, +Hokkaido +, +Japan +( +No. +10 in +Fig. 1 +), which by definition becomes the type locality. +Later +, + +Yamaguchi +(1934) + +reported the species from +Soranume +, +Hattaribetsu +, +Shimofurano +, +Makomanai +, Muroran and Shintoku, +Hokkaido +( +Nos +10, 11, 12, 3, 4, and 5, respectively). +Seven +whole-mounted specimens were identified as + +C + +. homodontus +in the ICHUM collection ( +Gelder and Ohtaka 2002 +), but as the slides were unlabeled and catalogue information is believed lost, their actual origin remains unknown. +However +, it is likely that at least some are +syntypes +but in the absence of firm data, the specimens were deemed to be potential +syntypes +by +Ohtaka et al +. (2020). + + +Material examined. + +ICHUM-1837–1840, 1842, 1845, 1846, are all potential +syntype +specimens of + +C. homodontus + +. + + +ICHUM-8597–8600 +, +four +whole-mounted specimens from +Jōzankei +, +Sapporo +and one each from +Samani +( +ICHUM-8601 +) and +Esashi +( +ICHUM-8602 +): locations, dates and collector are the same as those given for the + +C + +. makinoi +specimens described above. + + +Four +whole-mounted specimens from +Wakkanai +, +Hokkaido +( +45.43°N +, +141.66°E +), + +19 October 2020 + +, coll. +T. Konno +. + + +One +whole-mounted specimen from +Yagishiri Island +, +Hokkaido +( +44.43°N +, +141.41°E +), + +28 August 2002 + +, coll. +T. Kawai +. + + +Four +whole-mounted specimens from +Kaminokuni +, +Hokkaido +( +41.70°N +, +140.27°E +), + +20 August 2017 + +, coll. +A. Ohtaka + +. +All +the specimens were removed from + +Ca + +. japonicus. + + + + +Description. +Body cylindrical, 2.0 to +2.5 mm +long alive, 1.0–1.5 long mm preserved ( +Fig. 5A +). Body widest in segment 6, gradually narrower toward both anterior and posterior ends. Dorsal segmental appendage absent. Anterior pair of nephridial pores opening closely to the mid-line on the dorsal surface of segment 3. Head slightly narrower than segment 1 and as broad as posterior attachment disc. Peristomium distinctly shorter than head, and almost as long as segment 1. Peristomium with four tentacles on dorsal lip, each short and same length ( +Fig. 5B +). Lateral tentacles two pairs, slightly shorter than dorsal tentacles. Ventral lip with a slight median emargination. Dorsal and ventral jaws similar in shape and size, 21.0–29.0 µm wide across the base, each with large medial tooth on the anterior margin and four pairs of small lateral teeth on anterior surface ( +Fig. 5E, F +); dental formula 9/9 (4-1-4/4-1-4). Small lateral teeth pointed with angular ridges parallel to the median axes ( +Fig. 5G +); the median pair of small teeth are similar ( +Fig. 5E +) or smaller ( +Fig. 5F +). Most male reproductive organs located in segment 6 ( +Fig. 5H +). Glandular atrium tubular and folded, ental quarter dilated, total length 1.5–2.2 times segment diameter. Muscular atrium tubular, as thick as ectal part of glandular atrium, length about 0.3–0.4 segment diameter. Bursa ovoid, length about quarter segment diameter. Spermatheca in segment 5 ( +Fig. 5H +), length 1.5 times segment diameter, consisted of small ovoid spermathecal bulb, without ental process and tubular duct with quarter of thinner ectal part. + + +Variations. +Peristomial tentacles in preserved specimens often become swollen or shortened and difficult to distinguish ( +Fig. 5C, D +); often as a result of preservation and mounting conditions. The jaw width in +13 specimens +, including Yamaguchi’s voucher and our newly collected ones ranged from 21.0 µm to 29.0 µm (N = 25, mean value 25.4 µm). The dental formula of 9/9 (4-1-4/4-1-4) varies slightly with two jaws having five small teeth on one side and three on the other side of the large median tooth, e.g., 5-1-3. + + + + +Fig. 5. + +Cirrodrilus homodontus + +. A, Lateral view of a whole specimen, +Yamaguchi (1932b +: fig. 1A) was redrawn; B, ventral view of peristomium, a whole-mounted specimen from Wakkanai, Hokkaido; C, the same from Yagishiri Island, Hokkaido; D, the same from ICHUM-1845; E, anterior view of jaw in a whole-mounted specimen from Esashi, Hokkaido; F, the same from Kaminokuni, Hokkaido; G, lateral view of the dorsal jaw in ICHUM-1839; H, lateral view of segment 5 (left) with the spermatheca and male genitalia in segment 6 (right), a wholemounted specimen from Wakkanai. Abbreviations: b, bursa; ga, glandular atrium; ma, muscular atrium; mt, median tooth; sb, spermathecal bulb; sd, spermathecal duct; st, small tooth. Scale bars: A, H, 100µm; B–D, 50µm; E–G, 10 µm. + + + + +Fig. 6. Maximum likelihood tree of COI gene sequence in studied species. Bootstrap support ( +≥ +50) values are shown top left of the nodes. Shapes in the left of taxon name indicate collected localities (circles: Sapporo; triangles: Esashi; diamonds: Samani; squares: Imabetsu). + + + + +Table 2. Evolutionary divergence estimates over sequence pairs for COI gene of + +Cirrodrilus + +specimens. Average and range values (minimum and maximum values are shown in parentheses) of uncorrected +p +-distances among and within clade and species. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Hokkaido clade of + +C. makinoi +/ +tsugarensis + + +Honshu clade of + +C. makinoi +/ +tsugarensis + + + +C. homodontus + +
+Hokkaido clade of + +C. makinoi +/ +tsugarensis + +0.017 (0.016–0.020)
+Honshu clade of + +C. makinoi +/ +tsugarensis + +0.047 (0.045–0.051)0.000 (0.000–0.000)
+ +C. homodontus + +0.154 (0.145–0.169)0.149 (0.136–0.157)0.052 (0.000–0.086)
+ + + +Distribution. +Widely distributed across +Hokkaido +Island (open symbols in +Fig. 1 +). + + + + +Host. + +Cambaroides japonicus +(De Haan, 1841) + +, the “Japanese crayfish” or “Nihon-zarigani” in Japanese. + + +Habitat. +Specimens have been observed alive on all parts of the exposed host’s surface. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/D9/26/7E/D9267E79FF8A085BB6C3DFAF5B0EFE41.xml b/data/D9/26/7E/D9267E79FF8A085BB6C3DFAF5B0EFE41.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7779a2c68d4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/D9/26/7E/D9267E79FF8A085BB6C3DFAF5B0EFE41.xml @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@ + + + +Notas sobre Belostomatidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) en Chile + + + +Author + +Entomología, Laboratorio de + + + +Author + +Magallanes, Universidad de + + + +Author + +Bulnes, Av. + + + +Author + +E-mail, Chile. + +text + + +Revista Chilena de Entomología + + +2017 + +43 + + +75 +80 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.13885404 +0718-8994 +13885404 + + + + + + +Belostoma elegans +( +Mayr, 1871 +) + + + + + + +( +Figs. 1 +, +2 +, +3A, 3B +) + + +Esta especie fue citada por primera vez para +Chile +por +Schnack (1973a) +de las regiones + + +Metropolitana de +Santiago +, O´Higgins, y límite entre las regiones del +Maule y Biobío +. Posteriormente, +Faúndez y Campodonico (2015) +la reportan para la +Región de Los RÍos +. A continuación, entregamos los primeros registros de esta especie en la +Región de ValparaÍso +( +Figs. 1-2 +). + + + + +Material examinado. + +CHILE +: +Región de ValparaÍso +, +Isla Negra +, + +VIII-2015 + +, +5♂♂ +, +2♀♀ +, +G. Arriagada +leg. + + +Región de ValparaÍso +, +Limache +, + +12-IX-2014 + +, +2♀♀ +, 1 ninfa, +J. Vivar +leg. + +(todo el material se encuentra en la colección de referencia de heterópteros del Centro de Estudios en Biodiversidad (CEBCh)). + + +Los registros aquÍ entregados extienden levemente la distribución de la especie hacia el noroeste del país ( +Fig. 2 +). Hasta el momento + +B. elegans + +no ha sido registrada en la +Región de Coquimbo +y aún se mantiene el vacÍo distribucional en la +Región de La AraucanÍa +, que según +Faúndez y Campodonico (2015) +se debe probablemente a la falta de colectas en la zona. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/D9/26/7E/D9267E79FF8B0859B684DFFE5BDFFC66.xml b/data/D9/26/7E/D9267E79FF8B0859B684DFFE5BDFFC66.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9a04ebc15a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/D9/26/7E/D9267E79FF8B0859B684DFFE5BDFFC66.xml @@ -0,0 +1,281 @@ + + + +Notas sobre Belostomatidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) en Chile + + + +Author + +Entomología, Laboratorio de + + + +Author + +Magallanes, Universidad de + + + +Author + +Bulnes, Av. + + + +Author + +E-mail, Chile. + +text + + +Revista Chilena de Entomología + + +2017 + +43 + + +75 +80 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.13885404 +0718-8994 +13885404 + + + + + + +Belostoma bifoveolatum +Spinola, 1852 + + + + + + +( +Figs. 3C, 3D +) + + +Esta es la primera especie conocida de la familia en +Chile +, siendo descrita por +Spinola (1852) +sin dar detalles precisos de su distribución. Otras obras generales como +Signoret (1864) +, +Reed (1901) +, +De Carlo (1935) +y +Peña (2006) +no entregan mayores detalles distribucionales. No es hasta la revisión de +Lauck (1964) +en que se obtienen los primeros registros de localidad especÍficos para esta especie en +Chile +, situándola entre los 29° y 42° de latitud sur, distribución que más tarde +Schnack (1973a) +confirma. Actualmente esta distribución sigue siendo correcta según registros de colecciones y prospecciones realizadas por los autores. Cabe destacar que en el libro de + +Briones +et al. +(2012) + +se entregan una distribución errónea para esta especie, situándola desde la +Región de Arica y Parinacota +en el extremo norte de +Chile +hasta la +Región de la AraucanÍa +; este error forma parte de una serie de errores contenidos en esta obra, los cuales han sido revisados para algunos grupos de insectos ( +Contreras 2017 +; +Faúndez 2017 +). Adicionalmente, estos autores en el recuadro inferior de la página 97 muestran un ejemplar de + +B. elegans + +identificado erróneamente como + +B. bifoveolata + +[ +sic! +], haciendo además uso incorrecto de la grafÍa del nombre especÍfico, que es neutro y no femenino. De este modo, la distribución correcta de + +B. bifoveolatum + +en +Chile +debe considerarse entre las regiones de +Coquimbo +y +Los Lagos +. + + + +Figura 2. +Distribución de + +Belostoma elegans + +en Chile. Cuadrados = registros de +Schnack (1973a) +, cÍrculo = registro de +Faúndez y Campodonico (2015) +, estrellas = nuevos registros. + + + + +Otras especies de +Belostomatidae +en +Chile + + + +Dufour (1864) +cita para +Chile +y +Brasil +a + +Zaitha stollii +Amyot y Serville, 1843 + +, registros erróneos que han generado una serie de confusiones. +Mayr (1871) +examina el material de Dufour y determina que los ejemplares supuestamente de +Chile +correspondÍan en realidad a + +Zaitha boops +Dufour, 1864 + +(sinónimo menor de + +Belostoma asiaticum +( +Mayr, 1863 +)) + +. En trabajos posteriores ( +Schnack 1973a +; +Faúndez y Campodonico 2015 +; + +Ribeiro +et al. +2017 + +) esta idea ha sido confirmada. Adicionalmente, +Lauck (1962) +examina ejemplares de + +B. asiaticum + +de +Santiago de Chile +, pero indica que estos registros probablemente son erróneos ya que esta especie no alcanza varios de los paÍses sudamericanos para los cuales ha sido citada, concordando con los comentarios anteriores. + +Ribeiro +et al +. (2017) + +, mencionan la presencia en +Chile +de + +Belostoma anurum +(Herrich-Schaffer, 1848) + +aludiendo al registro de +Dufour (1864) +como + +Z. stollii + +, el cual en realidad no correspondÍa a esa especie, sino a + +B. asiaticum + +como señalamos anteriormente, por lo que su presencia en el paÍs también debe ser descartada. Finalmente +Heckman (2011) +cita para +Chile +a + +Belostoma ellipticum +Latreille, 1833 + +; sin embargo este registro fue declarado como incorrecto por + +Ribeiro +et al. +(2017) + +, indicando su ausencia en +Chile +, opinión con la que concordamos. De este modo en +Chile +únicamente se encuentran + +B. bifoveolatum + +y + +B. elegans + +. Ambas especies chilenas pueden diferenciarse de acuerdo a la siguiente clave: + + + +Clave para la identificación de las especies de +Belostomatidae +presentes en +Chile + +(modificada de +Lauck 1962 +y +Schnack 1973b +) + + +1(2) Sección esclerotizada del phallus en vista lateral gruesa y fuertemente convexa en el margen superior ( +Fig. 3B +), ápice alargado, porción anteocular de menor tamaño que la interocular ( +Fig. 3A +)……………………....…..…….……………. + +Belostoma elegans +( +Mayr, 1871 +) + +2(1) Sección esclerotizada del phallus en vista lateral, casi recta en el margen superior, ápice compacto ( +Fig. 3D +), porción anteocular de igual o mayor tamaño que la interocular ( +Fig. 3C +). ………………………………………………….……………. + +Belostoma bifoveolatum +Spinola, 1852 + + + + + \ No newline at end of file