diff --git a/data/C8/4F/4F/C84F4F23FF9B0F01FF395A78FD2EF8B2.xml b/data/C8/4F/4F/C84F4F23FF9B0F01FF395A78FD2EF8B2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a2f73ff52c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/C8/4F/4F/C84F4F23FF9B0F01FF395A78FD2EF8B2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,758 @@ + + + +A new species of the genus Scolopsis Cuvier, 1830 (Perciformes: Nemipteridae) from southern India and Sri Lanka + + + +Author + +Mishra, S. S. + + + +Author + +Biswas, Sudeepta + + + +Author + +Russell, Barry C. + + + +Author + +Satpathy, K. K. + + + +Author + +Selvanayagam, M. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2013 + +2013-01-31 + + +3609 + + +4 + + +443 +449 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.3609.4.7 +1175-5326 +216467 +D3D46AFA-A6A2-48B8-AD4D-663B82338D9A + + + + + + +Scolopsis igcarensis + +sp. nov. + + + + +Proposed name: Igcar monocle bream + + + +Figure 1,2; +Table 1 +. + + + + + +Scolopsis leucotaenia + +(non +Bleeker 1853 +) – +Day, 1875: 88 +, Pl. XXIII, fig. 4 ( +Bombay += +Mumbai +) + + + + + + +Holotype + +. + +ZSI F-10623/ +2, 118.2 mm + +SL, +Kalpakkam +( +12°33´N +, +80°11´E +), +Tamil Nadu +, +India +, + +September 2010 + +, +Sudeepta Biswas +. + + + + + +Paratypes + +. +BPBM 18765 +, 74.0 mm SL, +Negombo Reef +( +7°13ʹN +, +79°50ʹE +), +Sri Lanka +, adjacent sand and rubble bottom, + +8 m + +depth, speared, + +30 March 1975 + +, +John E. Randall + +; + +BPBM 19054 +, +75.4 mm +SL, +Negombo Reef +, +Sri Lanka +, sand bottom next to reef, + +8 m + +depth, speared, + +27 March 1975 + +, +John E. Randall + +; + +BPBM 27712 +, 74.0 mm SL, +off Mulloor Point +, +Vizhinjam +( +8°23ʹ N +, +76°59ʹ E +), +Kerala +, +India +, rocky bottom in + +4 m + +, dynamite collection by fisherman, + +14 February 1980 + +, +John E. Randall + +; + +CMFRI GB.31.98.5.6 +, +148.1 mm +SL, +Tuticorin Fishing Harbour +( +8°47ʹ N +, +78°09ʹ E +), + +21 March 2012 + +, +K.K. Bineesh + +; + +ZSI F-10624/2 +, 5: +75.9–115.6 mm +SL, +Kalpakkam +, +Tamil Nadu +, +India +, + +September 2010 + +, +Sudeepta Biswas + +; + +ZSI F- 10625/2 +, 3: +67.1–82.4 mm +SL, +Kalpakkam +, +Tamil Nadu +, +India +, + +July 2008 + +, +Sudeepta Biswas +. + + + + + +Diagnosis +. A species of + +Scolopsis + +with the following combination of characters: scales on top of head reaching forward to between anterior nostril and snout tip; lower margin of eye tangent to a line from snout tip to upper pectoral fin base; an exposed bony ridge below eye; second anal spine larger and more robust than first or second anal spines; a white band from behind eye to level of end of dorsal fin base. + + + + +Description +. Counts and proportional measurements of the +type +series are provided in +Table 1 +. + +Dorsal-fin rays X, 9; Anal-fin rays III, 7; Pectoral-fin rays ii, 17 (16–18); Ventral-fin rays I, 5. +Body moderately deep, laterally compressed, depth 2.3 (2.0–2.7) in SL. Dorsal profile of head more convex than ventral contour, head length 3.2 (2.9–3.4) in SL. Snout short, 3.9 (3.2–4.1) in HL. Eye moderately large, 3.3 (2.5–3.3) in HL, eye diameter about equal to or a little more than snout length 0.9 (0.6–1.0) in snout length. Interorbital width 1.2 (1.1–1.9); Suborbital depth 2.0 (2.0–4.4) in eye diameter; a moderately large backwardlydirected spine and with 3 smaller spines below this on posterior margin of suborbital. An exposed bony ridge present beneath eye immediately behind suborbital, this ridge pointed at each end, sometimes spinous in larger specimens. Posterior margin of opercle coarsely denticulate; posterior margin of preopercle denticulate. Canine teeth absent. Teeth conical, pointed; in several bands anteriorly on upper jaw; sides of lower jaw with a single series of teeth anteriorly that forms a band of 3 or 4 rows. Maxilla smooth. Gill rakers short and stubby, 11 (10–11) on first arch. Lower margin of eye tangent to a line from snout tip to upper pectoral fin base. +Second anal spine larger and more robust than other two spines, its length 2.2 (1.9–2.5) times that of first and 1.5 (1.2–1.5) times that of third. Caudal fin forked, lobes pointed; lower lobe a little shorter than upper. Pelvic fins moderately long, reaching beyond anus, 1.1 (1.1–1.2) in HL. Pectoral fins reaching to or just short of level of anus, 1.2 (1.1–1.4) in HL. Body covered with ctenoid scales. Temporal region scaled, scales on top of head reaching forward to in front of anterior nostril. Preopercle scales in 4 (3–5) rows behind eye; sub-orbital naked; lower limb of preopercle with single row of embedded scales. Opercle with 5 rows of scales; upper margin of opercle with a small, flat embedded spine. Lateral line with 42 (41–44) pored scales, 3½ transverse scale rows above lateral line, 14 (13–15) rows below. Vertebrae 22. +Colour. Body reddish brown, with a distinct whitish band from behind upper edge of eye to almost end of dorsal fin running mostly below the lateral line. Scales usually dark brown at middle. Pectoral fin light pink; dorsal and anal fin darker brown, caudal fin lighter. + + + +Distribution. +India +- coasts of Tamil Nadu and Kerala, +Mumbai +, and +Sri Lanka +. + + + + +Etymology +. The species name is derived from the acronym of the Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research (IGCAR), Kalpakkam, where it was first collected and in recognition of the contribution of IGCAR to marine environmental studies and support for ongoing ichthyological research on the Tamil Nadu coast of +India +. The common name Igcar monocle bream is proposed for this species. + + + + +TABLE 1. +Counts and proportional measurements of the holotype and 12 paratypes of + +Scolopsis igcarensis + +sp. nov. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Holotype ZSI F-10623/2, 118.2 mm SLParatypes 12 specimens: 67.1–148.1 mm SL
Counts
Dorsal spines1010–10
Dorsal rays99–9
Anal spines33–3
Anal rays77–7
Pectoral branched rays (left)1716–18
Pectoral branched rays (right)1716–17
Lateral line (Llat) scales4241–44
Transverse scale rows above Llat3.53.5–3.5
Transverse scale rows below Llat1413–15
Gill rakers (upper limb)65–6
Gill rakers (lower limb)55–5
Gill rakers (total)1110–11
Preopercle scale rows (behind eye)43–5
Preopercle scale rows (below eye)65–7
Proportional measurements
Depth in SL2.32.0–2.7
Head length (HL) in SL3.22.9–3.4
Depth in HL0.70.6–0.9
Snout length in HL3.93.2–4.1
Eye diameter in HL3.32.5 –3.3
Eye in snout length0.90.6–1.0
Intorbital width in eye1.21.0–1.9
Suborbital depth in eye2.02.0–4.4
Peduncle depth in peduncle length0.90.8–1.3
Dorsal fin length in SL1.61.6–1.8
Anal fin length in SL5.74.5–6.0
Pectoral fin length in HL1.21.1–1.4
Pelvic fin length in HL1.11.1–1.2
Pectoral fin length in pelvic fin length1.00.9–1.2
1st dorsal spine length in longest dorsal spine1.81.6–2.3
longest dorsal spine length in longest dorsal dray1.31.0–1.3
1st anal spine length in 2nd anal spine2.21.9–2.5
2nd anal spine length in 3rd anal spine0.70.7–0.8
+ + + +Discussion. +Among the known species of the genus, + +Scolopsis igcarensis + + +sp. nov. + +most resembles + +S. vosmeri +( +Bloch 1792 +) + +( +Fig. 3 +). + +Scolopsis vosmeri + +, however, differs from + +S. igcarensis + +in having a more robust suborbital spine; bony ridge beneath eye less prominent, covered with skin; and pectoral fins not reaching to level of anus. + +Scolopsis vosmeri + +also differs in colour pattern, described as having “a white cheek band and sometimes a whitish horizontal stripe below lateral line from edge of opercle to below soft part of dorsal fin ( +Day 1875 +; +Russell 1990 +). The stripe in + +S. vosmeri + +is more usually yellowish-white and only found in large specimens ( +Fig. 3 +). Small specimens do not possess this stripe but the typical white vertical cheek band is always present in + +S. vosmeri + +. This cheek band is lacking in all of our specimens of + +Scolopsis igcarensis + +and together with the characters above, clearly distinguishes it from + +S vosmeri + +. + + + +FIGURE 1. + +Scolopsis igcarensis + + +sp. nov. + +, ZSI F-10625/2, paratype, 79.7 mm SL, Kalpakkam, India. + + + + +FIGURE 2. + +Scolopsis igcarensis + + +sp. nov. + +, BPBM 18765, paratype, 74.0 mm SL, Negombo Reef, Sri Lanka. (photo: J.E. Randall) + + + + +FIGURE 3. + +Scolopsis vosmeri +(Bloch) + +, 159 mm SL, Sri Lanka, Hikkaduwa. (photo: J.E. Randall) + + + + +FIGURE 4. + +Scolopsis leucotaenia + +as figured in +Day (1875) +. + + + + +FIGURE 5. + +Scolopsis +leucotaenia +( +Bleeker 1853 +) + +, juvenile of + +Scolopsis margaritifer +(Cuvier 1830) + +, from +Bleeker (1875 +–76). + + + +Day (1875 +: Plate XXIII, fig. 4) figured a specimen from +Bombay +(= +Mumbai +) as + +Scolopsis leucotaenia +(Bleeker) + +( +Fig. 4 +) that closely resembles + +S. igcarensis +. + +The true + +Scolopsis leucotaenia + +( +Fig. 5 +), however, is the juvenile colour form of + +Scolopsis margaritifer +(Cuvier 1830) ( +Russell, 1990 +) + +, and differs from + +S. igcarensis + +in having a distinct black spot anteriorly on the dorsal fin between the first three rays (absent in Day’s Plate XXIII, fig. 4 and + +S. igcarensis + +), and the uppermost dark band on the body above the lateral line (this band is mostly on or below the lateral line in Day’s figure and + +S. igcarensis + +). + + + +Scolopsis +. +leucotaenia + +(= + +margaritifer + +) also differs from + +S. igcarensis + +in having the head scales reaching forward only to the anterior margin of the eye (versus head scales extending forward to or in front of anterior nostrils in + +S. igcarensis + +); fewer lateral-line scales (34 to 39, versus 42–43); longer pelvic fins, that reach almost to or beyond the anal fin origin (versus pelvics reaching only to just beyond anus); center of the scales on the body with pearly or whitish spots (versus body scales dark brown in middle); and the second anal spine not longer and stronger than the third spine. + + +Day’s figured specimen (ZSI F-401), c. +57 mm +SL, is damaged but has the head scaled to the front of anterior nostril, a prominent suborbital ridge beneath the eye (right side), at least 40 lateral-line scales, and 17 pectoral-fin rays—characters that are consistent with + +S. igcarensis + +. Thus, we feel confident in concluding that Day’s record of + +Scolopsis leucotaenia + +represents + +S +. +igcarensis + +. + + +Comparative material. + +Scolopsis igcarensis + +: ZSI F-401, c. +57 mm +SL, +Bombay +(= +Mumbai +), +India +(specimen figured as + +S. leucotaenia + +in +Day 1875 +). + +Scolopsis margaritifer + +: NTM S.10822-005, 3: +58–70 mm +SL, Halmahera, +Indonesia +; NTM S.11968-015, +47 mm +SL, NE West Islet, +Ashmore +Reef, Timor Sea, +Australia +; NTM S.13686-025, +85 mm +SL, reef off Riwo Village, Madang, +Papua New Guinea +. + +Scolopsis vosmeri + +: AMS I.21013-009, +112.1 mm +SL, Madras (=Chennai), +India +; BPBM 27713, 65.0 mm SL, Vizhinjam, Kerala, +India +; ZSI F-331-333, 3: +69–153 mm +SL, Madras (=Chennai), (specimens figured in +Day 1875 +); ZSI F-2475 & 2476, 2: +124–129 mm +SL, Madras (=Chennai), +India +; ZSI F-10626/2, 1 ex., +137 mm +SL, Tharuvaikullam, Tamil Nadu, +India +; ZSI F-10627/2, 5: +56.1–133.8 mm +SL, Kalpakkam, Tamil Nadu, +India +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file