diff --git a/data/03/8D/87/038D87A5B93E9E3D2491FF4DD6DE6218.xml b/data/03/8D/87/038D87A5B93E9E3D2491FF4DD6DE6218.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e1b87083010 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/8D/87/038D87A5B93E9E3D2491FF4DD6DE6218.xml @@ -0,0 +1,454 @@ + + + +On the Neotropical Brincadorus: redescription, new species, taxonomic key and description of a related new genus (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae) + + + +Author + +Camisão, Beatriz M. +Laboratório de Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 6244, 21941 - 971, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. + + + +Author + +Zahniser, James N. +United States Department of Agriculture, APHIS-PPQ-NIS, MRC- 168, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, P. O. Box 37012, Washington DC 20013 - 7012 USA. + + + +Author + +Takiya, Daniela M. +Laboratório de Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 6244, 21941 - 971, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-08-27 + + +5497 + + +4 + + +537 +558 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5497.4.5 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5497.4.5 +1175-5326 +13619117 +1B87563E-2BC9-4665-B5AE-B5EDBD4F541E + + + + + + + +Brincadorus + +Oman +, 1938 + + + + + + + + +( +Figures 1–8 +) + + + + + +Additional literature citations: + + + +Evans, 1947: 219 +(classification). + +Oman +, 1938: 361 + +(generic description). +Linnavuori, 1959: 158 +(revision of Neotropical +Deltocephalinae +). +Metcalf, 1966: 183 +(catalogue). +Zanol & Menezes, 1982: 38 +(catalogue). + +Oman +et al. +, 1990: 196 + +(catalogue). +Zahniser, 2007 +(on-line catalogue). +Zanol, 2008: 14 +(catalogue). +Zahniser & Dietrich 2013: 49 +(phylogeny of +Deltocephalinae +and description of tribe). + +Cao +et al. +2022 + +(phylogeny of +Deltocephalinae +). + + + + +Type-species: + +Brincadorus laticeps + + +Oman +, 1938 + +. + + + + +Length +: 5.0– +7.4 mm +. + + +Coloration +: Body mostly yellow dorsally and ventrally. + + +External morphology: +Head short, crown not produced anteriorly, transocular width more than two times width of eye; transocular width subequal to pronotum width; coronal suture visible; crown surface smooth; frontal region flat or convex; anterior margin with numerous transverse fine carinae ( +Fig. 3 +); transition from crown to face angled; lateral frontal suture reaching only partway to ocellus; ocellus medium sized, on anterior margin of head, close to eye, distance between ocellus and eye more than twice the diameter of ocellus; eye with mesal margin entire. Antennal ledges present, weakly developed. Clypellar suture complete; straight or arcuate. Clypellus tumid in lateral view, slightly constricted at base and narrowing toward apex, or not constricted at base and tapering apically, apex following natural curve of gena. Gena incised laterally; single fine erect seta close to lateral frontal suture present. Lorum narrower than clypellus near base, close to lower genal margin. Frontoclypeus shagreen, shorter than wide. + +Pronotum with transverse ridges and furrows, with distinct lateral carina. Scutellum not inflated. + +Forewing rounded apically; macropterous; with or without crossveins on costal margin; outer anteapical cell truncate; inner anteapical cell open; corium with or without extra crossveins; vein +R +1 diverging distad of +R +fork; with crossvein between A1 vein and claval suture; without crossvein between veins A1 and A2; appendix restricted to anal margin. + + +Profemur with +AM +1 and intercalary row of setae present; row AV with short or long macrosetae reaching midlength of profemur; with 2 apical setae. Protibia anterodorsal margin rounded. Mesofemur row AV with short, stout macrosetae, AV apical setae present. Metafemur setal formula 2+2+1. Metatarsomere I longer than metatarsomeres II and III combined; pecten with three platellate setae; PV apical seta acuminate. + + +Male genitalia: +Pygofer incised to near mid-length; without developed rows of macrosetae; dorsal process present, thick at base, constricted medially, apically bifurcate with short, blunt dorsal rami and with longer, falcate ventral rami; posterior margin truncate. Valve subtriangular, articulated with pygofer. Subgenital plate triangular, articulated with valve; outer lateral margin slightly convex in ventral view; inner margin excavated medially; plates widely separated and extending dorsad along pygofer side; apex acuminate or bifurcate; without developed macrosetae. Connective articulated to aedeagus; arms appressed anteriorly or slightly divergent, stem longer or shorter than arms. Style preapical lobe absent; apophysis shorter than rest of style; reaching or not reaching apex of connective. Aedeagus with or without basidorsal and apical processes; gonopore subapical or apical. Phragma forming pair of membranous or partly sclerotized processes extending over aedeagal shaft, with setae dorsally. Segment X sclerotized. + + +Female terminalia: +Pygofer with macrosetae near posterior margin. Internal abdominal sternite VIII membranous. Valvulae I convex ventrally; shaft with dorsal sculpturing pattern imbricate with individual scales arranged in more or less even, oblique rows. Valvulae II with numerous close-set subtriangular teeth on dorsal margin beyond membranous notch, each bearing small denticles on the anterior and posterior margin. Gonoplacs with apex rounded, with small setae on ventral margin. + + + + +Diagnosis: +The genus can be distinguished by its larger size (5.0 to +7.4 mm +), short head, transition of crown to face angled, anterior margin of head with numerous transverse carinae, male pygofer and subgenital plate without macrosetae, male pygofer with a pair of internal processes arising dorsally, subgenital plates rising dorsad along pygofer side and with internal margin excavated medially, and unique shape of styles, with long anterior arm. + + +Notes +: + +Oman +(1938) + +treated the genus as a member of the subfamily +Aphrodinae +, and regarded it as related to + +Stroggylocephalus +Flor, 1861 + +, a genus recorded from the Old World. +Evans (1947) +placed the genus in the tribe +Selenocephalini +, which belonged to the subfamily +Iassinae +at the time. +Linnavuori (1959) +correctly included + +Brincadorus + +in +Deltocephalinae +, due to the male genital structure. +Zahniser & Dietrich (2013) +included the genus in +Bahitini +, but it is here considered unplaced to tribe (see Discussion). + + + + + + +List and distribution of species of + +Brincadorus + + + + + + + + +Brincadorus cruceno + + +sp. nov. + +Bolivia +: José Ballivián and +Santa Cruz +Departments; +Peru +: +Huánuco +and +San Martín +Regions. + + + +Brincadorus gracilis + + +sp. nov. + +Ecuador +: +Sucumbíos Province +; +Peru +: +Huánuco Region +. + + + +Brincadorus laticeps + + +Oman +, 1938 + +. +Brazil +: +Mato Grosso +(see the notes section below). + + + +Brincadorus limoncocha + + +sp. nov. + +Ecuador +: +Sucumbíos Province +. + + + +Brincadorus quincemil + + +sp. nov. + +Peru +: +Cusco Region +. + + + +Brincadorus yanayacu + + +sp. nov. + +Ecuador +: Tungurahia and +Sucumbíos Province +. + + + +Brincadorus +sp. + +(unidentified female). +Brazil +: +Rio de Janeiro State +. + + + + +Taxonomic key to males of + +Brincadorus + + + + + + + + + + +1 Aedeagus without basidorsal process ( +Fig. 1G +).............................................................. 2 + + + + +- Aedeagus with basidorsal process ( +Figs. 4F +, +5H +)............................................................. 4 + + + + + + +2(1) Aedeagus shaft short and slightly expanded at midlength, becoming narrower towards apex in lateral view ( +Figs. 7F–G +)...................................................................................... + +Brincadorus yanayacu + + + + + +- Aedeagus shaft long and slender, without expansions in lateral view ( +Figs. 1G–H +, +2F–G +)............................ 3 + + + + + + +3(2) Aedeagus with pre–apical spine dorsally, apical region curved downward ( +Figs. 2F–G +).............. + +Brincadorus cruceno + + + + + +- +Aedeagus without pre–apical spine dorsally, apical region somewhat straight ( +Figs. 1G–H +)........... + +Brincadorus laticeps + + + + + + + +4(1) Aedeagus with basidorsal process strongly bifurcate; without apical process ( +Figs. 5H–I +.......... + +Brincadorus limoncocha + + + + + +- Aedeagus with basidorsal process not bifurcate; with flap–like apical process ( +Figs. 4F–G +, +6F–G +)..................... 5 + + + + + + +5(4) Subgenital plate apex bifurcate ( +Fig. 6D +); aedeagus with wide apical extension; basidorsal process with rami short ( +Figs. 6F–G +)............................................................................. + +Brincadorus quincemil + + + + + +- Subgenital plate apex not bifurcate ( +Fig. 5D +); aedeagus with basidorsal processes longer and slender ( +Figs. 4F–G +)............................................................................................ + +Brincadorus gracilis + + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/8D/87/038D87A5B93F9E3B2491FB65D6C465D0.xml b/data/03/8D/87/038D87A5B93F9E3B2491FB65D6C465D0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d2c9b27e65d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/8D/87/038D87A5B93F9E3B2491FB65D6C465D0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,315 @@ + + + +On the Neotropical Brincadorus: redescription, new species, taxonomic key and description of a related new genus (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae) + + + +Author + +Camisão, Beatriz M. +Laboratório de Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 6244, 21941 - 971, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. + + + +Author + +Zahniser, James N. +United States Department of Agriculture, APHIS-PPQ-NIS, MRC- 168, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, P. O. Box 37012, Washington DC 20013 - 7012 USA. + + + +Author + +Takiya, Daniela M. +Laboratório de Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 6244, 21941 - 971, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-08-27 + + +5497 + + +4 + + +537 +558 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5497.4.5 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5497.4.5 +1175-5326 +13619117 +1B87563E-2BC9-4665-B5AE-B5EDBD4F541E + + + + + + + +Brincadorus laticeps +Oman + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 1 +) + + +Type-locality: +Chapada dos Guimarães, +Mato Grosso State +, +Brasil +. + + +Lengh: +5.75–7 mm +. + + +Coloration: +Body tan dorsally, and yellow ventrally ( +Figs. 1A–C +). Crown, pronotum, and mesonotum with muscle impressions slightly darker. Forewing translucent, dark yellow, without maculae or spots ( +Fig. 1A +), costal margin dark brown. + + +External morphology: +Coronal suture attaining midlength of crown; anterior margin with numerous transverse carinae ( +Fig. 1B +). Clypellar suture slightly arcuate. Clypellus slightly constricted at base and narrowing towards apex ( +Fig. 1B +). Forewing without extra crossveins on costal margin ( +Fig. 1A +). Profemur intercalary row with 12 to 14 setae; row AV with 4 to 7 short, stout macrosetae. Protibia rows AD+PD with 1+4 macrosetae. Other characters as in the generic description. + + +Male genitalia: +Pygofer with dorsal process short, bifurcate, curved posteroventrally ( +Fig. 1D +). Subgenital plate apex acuminate, extending beyond apex of pygofer in lateral view ( +Fig. 1C–E +). Connective arms closely appressed in dorsal view ( +Fig. 1F +). Style apophysis apex rounded in lateral view, acuminate in ventral view, smooth, somewhat straight, extending beyond midlength of subgenital plates in dorsal view, extending beyond connective stem in ventral view ( +Figs. 1F–G +). Aedeagus without processes; shaft long, slender, curved dorsally in lateral view; apex acuminate in lateral and dorsal view; gonopore preapical, opening ventrally ( +Fig. 1F–H +). + + +Female terminalia: +Female unknown. + + +Notes: + +Brincadorus laticeps + + +Oman +, 1938 + +can be distinguished from the other species of the genus by the aedeagus long, slender, without basidorsal or preapical processes. + + +The male +holotype +of + +B. laticeps + +was not previously dissected. To clarify the identity of + +B. laticeps + +, we dissected the specimen. It agrees with all diagnostic genitalia characters with the +paratype +from Chapada, which is illustrated here. + +Oman +(1938) + +listed +two paratypes +, one from the type-locality of Chapada, +Brazil +, which was studied and illustrated in the present work, and another from Rurrenabaque, +Bolivia +. +Linnavuori (1959) +redescribed the species and provided illustrations of the male genitalia based on a +paratype +. However, Linnavuori did not state which +paratype +he examined. After close examination of his drawings and redescription and comparison to the +holotype +and Chapada +paratype +, it was clear that the specimen he studied is not + +B. laticeps + +and is instead the newly described species + +B. cruceno + +. We concluded that +Linnavuori (1959) +illustrated the misidentified Bolivian +paratype +, and we list the Rurrenabaque locality for + +B. cruceno + +. The Bolivian +paratype +was stated to be deposited at USNM ( + +Oman +, 1938 + +), but after a thorough search of the collection, it was not found. + + + +FIGURE 1. + +Brincadorus laticeps + +Oman, 1938 +. A–C, I, male holotype, USNMENT01513019. D–G, male paratype, USNMENT01513139. A, Dorsal habitus; B, Head, frontal view; C, Abdomen, ventral view; D, Pygofer, valve and subgenital plates, lateral view; E, Pygofer, valve and subgenital plates, dorsal view; F, Connective, styles and aedeagus, ventral view; G, Connective, styles and aedeagus, lateral view; H, Aedeagus apex, lateral view; I, Holotype labels. + + + +The labels of the +holotype +and +paratype +state only the word “Chapada” for the collecting locality. In +Brazil +, there are many places called Chapada, since it is the Portuguese word for a plateau, a geological formation that occurs in several States throughout the country. +Zanol & Menezes (1982) +interpreted it as being the Parque Nacional Chapada dos Guimarães, in +Mato Grosso State +, a very important National Park in central +Brazil +, characterized by a vast Cerrado vegetation. The specimen labels say “Collection CF Baker”, which again leaves an ambiguity since a great part of the Charles F. Baker collection was actually collected by Herbert H. Smith. We do know that H. H. Smith collected extensively at Chapada dos Guimarães, and that he was a close associate of Baker, who also collected in +Brazil +. There is an extensive number of specimens listed by +Linnavuori (1959) +, for example, from “Chapada” that were collected by H. H. Smith. In one of his papers, Baker (1898) lists specimens of + +Neocoelidia rubrolineata +Baker, 1898 + +collected by H. H. Smith at Chapada and Corumbá, which is a city located at the time at +Mato Grosso State +(now it is part of +Mato Grosso do Sul State +, which was created after 1977). Many of Smith’s specimens at the Carnegie Museum of Natural History (Pittsburgh, PA), where he was employed for some time, are labeled similarly to the “C.F. Baker Collection” specimens at USNM examined here, with the locality indicated only by “Chapada” and with an abbreviated month for the date of collection. After consulting other entomologists on the matter and reading the obituaries of Smith ( + +Holland +, 1919 + +; +Clapp, 1920 +) and Baker ( +Essig, 1927 +), we concluded that +Zanol & Menezes (1982) +identification of the locality as Chapada dos Guimarães is probably correct, and therefore maintain the type-locality of + +B. laticeps + +as Chapada dos Guimarães in +Mato Grosso State +. + + +Zanol & Menezes (1982) +recorded + +B. laticeps + +from +São Paulo State +in +Brazil +, based on specimens collected and examined by them. However, since the only illustration of the genitalia available at that time was the misidentified specimen from Linnavuori’s work, it is possible that these authors misidentified their studied specimens, that may actually belong to + +B. cruceno +. + +Until those specimens can be located or further collecting trips can be made, the species recorded by Zanol & Menezes from +São Paulo +locality should be considered uncertain. Consequently, + +B. laticeps + +is currently known only from its type-locality of Chapada, +Brazil +. + + + + +Material examined: + + +holotype + + +, Chapada / Jan. / +Collection CF Baker +/ +Type No. +51663 U.S. +N.M. +/ + +Brincadorus laticeps + +Oman +/ UNSMENT01513019 ( +USNM +) + +. + + +Paratype + +, + +same data except USNMENT01513139 ( +USNM +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455143FFF970C8FCE8FD2F6F8F.xml b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455143FFF970C8FCE8FD2F6F8F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1f6c6f82869 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455143FFF970C8FCE8FD2F6F8F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,366 @@ + + + +Notes, new records, and transference in South American Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) + + + +Author + +Olivier, Renan Da Silva +Laboratório de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, 79090 - 900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil + + + +Author + +Santos-Silva, Antonio +Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil + + + +Author + +Monné, Marcela Laura +Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940 - 040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Costa-Pinto, Paula Jéssica +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Jardim das Américas, 81530 - 000, Curitiba, PR, Brazil + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-08-21 + + +5496 + + +4 + + +451 +499 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 +1175-5326 +13617630 +CAB6E914-24D3-4B84-96F8-0CCC2CEF5390 + + + + + + + +Acyphoderes aurulenta +( +Kirby, 1818 +) + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 18 +) + + + + + + + +Necydalis aurulenta +Kirby, 1818: 443 + + +. + + + + + +Acyphoderes aurulenta + +; + +Audinet-Serville, 1834a: 548 + +. + + + + + +Odontocera aurulenta + +; + +Kirby, 1834: 92 + +. + + + + + +Acyphoderes aurulentus + +; + +White, 1855: 195 + +. + + + + + + +Stenopterus aurulentus +Dalman, 1823: 71 + + +. + + + + + + +Acyphoderes sericinus +White, 1855: 195 + + +. + + + + + +Remarks. +Kirby (1818) +described + +Necydalis aurulenta + +based on a single specimen from +Brazil +. +Dalman (1823) +described + +Stenopterus aurulentus + +based on +syntypes +male and female from +Brazil +(species not listed in +Monné 2024a +). Later, +White (1855) +described + +Acyphoderes sericinus + +also based on a single specimen from +Brazil +. +Audinet-Serville (1834a) +listed + +S. aurulentus + +as being the same as + +A. aurulenta + +: “ + +Odontocera aurulenta +.— + + +Stenopterus aurulentus +Dalm. +Analect. Entomol +. + +, pag. 71, nº 63. Du +Brésil +.” It is important to note that the name of the species group, + +Stenopterus aurulentus + +was clearly described as a new species (see page “vi” and the subtitle on page +37 in +Dalman (1823)) +. Unfortunately, we do not have a photograph of the +syntypes +of + +S. aurulentus + +. However, the original description suggests that it is really the same as + +Acyphoderes aurulenta + +. +Bates (1873) +synonymized + +A. sericinus + +with + +A. aurulenta + +. Gundulach (1894) reported + +Odontocera abdominalis +( +Olivier, 1800 +) + +from +Puerto Rico +. However, according to +Fisher (1930) +: “In the +United States +National Museum are two examples of this species [ + +Acyphoderes aurulenta + +] which were identified as + +abdominalis +Olivier. + +One of these examples is labeled +Mayaguez +, +Porto Rico +, and the other one +Cayey +, +Porto Rico +, +May 23, 1923 +, collected by G. N. Wolcott. These +two specimens +show a slight variation from the typical specimens from +Brazil +by not having the femora and tibiae black in the middle, and by the elytra being without a furcated black vitta on each side, but these specimens seem to be the extreme light form of this species, and not sufficiently distinct to warrant a new name. In a series examined from +Brazil +, all of the examples have the black bands on the legs, but in a few of these examples the furcated black vittae on the elytra are absent … The specimens listed as + +abdominalis + +from +Porto Rico +by Gahan, and Leng and Mutchler are probably + +aurulenta +(Kirby) + +.” Only by examining species from +Puerto Rico +will it be possible to know whether +Fisher (1930) +was right or not. + + +Currently, it is known from +Brazil +( +Mato Grosso +, +Goiás +, +Bahia +, +Minas Gerais +, +Espírito Santo +, +Rio de Janeiro +, +São Paulo +, +Paraná +, +Santa Catarina +, and +Rio Grande do Sul +), +Bolivia +, +Paraguay +, +Argentina +( +Formosa +and Misiones), +Uruguay +, and +Puerto Rico +? ( +Monné 2024a +; +Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023 +). + + + + +Material examined. + +BRAZIL +, + +Mato Grosso do Sul + +( +new state record +): +Campo Grande +, +1 female +( +MNRJ- +ENT-47638), + +21.X.1993 + +, +W.W. Koller +leg. ( +MNRJ +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455145FFFF70C8FC8EFA636DE3.xml b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455145FFFF70C8FC8EFA636DE3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..51381ab5ba7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455145FFFF70C8FC8EFA636DE3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,270 @@ + + + +Notes, new records, and transference in South American Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) + + + +Author + +Olivier, Renan Da Silva +Laboratório de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, 79090 - 900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil + + + +Author + +Santos-Silva, Antonio +Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil + + + +Author + +Monné, Marcela Laura +Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940 - 040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Costa-Pinto, Paula Jéssica +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Jardim das Américas, 81530 - 000, Curitiba, PR, Brazil + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-08-21 + + +5496 + + +4 + + +451 +499 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 +1175-5326 +13617630 +CAB6E914-24D3-4B84-96F8-0CCC2CEF5390 + + + + + + + +Cosmisoma brullei +( +Mulsant, 1862 +) + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 20 +) + + + + + + + +Callimoxys brullei +Mulsant, 1862: 215 + + +. + + + + + +Cosmosoma brullei + +; + +Gahan & Gounelle, 1910: 237 + +. + + + + + + +Cosmisoma nodicollis +Burmeister, 1865: 171 + + +. + + + + + +Compsocerus nodicollis + +; + +Lacordaire, 1869: 37 + +. + + + + + +Remarks. +This species was described based on +holotype +from “la +Grèce +” [ +Greece +]. Later, +Burmeister (1865) +described + +Cosmisoma nodicollis + +based on a single specimen from +Argentina +(Parana). +Gahan & Gounelle (1910) +transferred + +Callimoxys brullei + +to + +Cosmisoma + +and synonymized + +Cosmisoma nodicollis + +with it. + + +Currently, it is known from +Brazil +( +Rondônia +, +Mato Grosso +, +Goiás +, +Paraíba +, +Bahia +, +Minas Gerais +, +Espírito Santo +, +Rio de Janeiro +, +São Paulo +, +Paraná +, +Santa Catarina +, and +Rio Grande do Sul +), +Bolivia +( +Santa Cruz +and +Tarija +), +Paraguay +, +Argentina +( +Catamarca +, +Tucumán +, Córdoba, Misiones, +Santa Fé +, +Corrientes +, +Entre Ríos +, and +Buenos Aires +), and +Uruguay +( +Monné 2024a +; +Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023 +). +Zajciw (1966) +recorded it from the Brazilian state of Ceará, which is not listed by +Monné (2024a) +. + + + + +Material examined. + +BRAZIL +, + +Mato Grosso do Sul + +( +new state record +): +Dourados +, Faz.[enda] +Coqueiro +, +Azulão +, +22°12’40.9”S +54°54’12.8”W +, + +440 m + +, +1 male +(MNRJ-ENT-47325), + +05.IV.2012 + +, +I.F.S. Couto +leg. ( +MNRJ +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455146FFFC70C8FF49FB116B5A.xml b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455146FFFC70C8FF49FB116B5A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fa1a6c6ab03 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455146FFFC70C8FF49FB116B5A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,270 @@ + + + +Notes, new records, and transference in South American Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) + + + +Author + +Olivier, Renan Da Silva +Laboratório de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, 79090 - 900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil + + + +Author + +Santos-Silva, Antonio +Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil + + + +Author + +Monné, Marcela Laura +Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940 - 040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Costa-Pinto, Paula Jéssica +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Jardim das Américas, 81530 - 000, Curitiba, PR, Brazil + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-08-21 + + +5496 + + +4 + + +451 +499 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 +1175-5326 +13617630 +CAB6E914-24D3-4B84-96F8-0CCC2CEF5390 + + + + + + + +Coccoderus novempunctatus +( +Germar, 1823 +) + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 25 +) + + + + + + + +Cerambyx +( +Stenocorus +) +novempunctatus +Germar, 1823: 505 + + +. + + + + + +Coccoderus +? 9-punctatus + +; + +Germar, 1839: 330 + +. + + + + + +Coccoderus novempunctatus + +; + +White, 1853: 96 + +. + + + + + + +Coccoderus tuberculatus +Buquet, 1840: 295 + + +. + + + + + +Remarks. +Germar (1823) +described + +Cerambyx +( +Stenocorus +) +novempunctatus + +based on +holotype +from +Brazil +. +Buquet (1840) +described + +C. tuberculatus + +based on a single male from +Brazil +. +White (1853) +synonymized + +C. tuberculatus + +with + +C. novempunctatus + +. + + +Currently, it is known from +Brazil +( +Mato Grosso +, +Goiás +, Distrito Federal, +Maranhão +, +Rio Grande do Norte +, +Bahia +, +Minas Gerais +, +Espírito Santo +, +Rio de Janeiro +, +São Paulo +, +Paraná +, +Santa Catarina +, and +Rio Grande do Sul +), +Bolivia +( +Santa Cruz +and +Tarija +), +Paraguay +, +Argentina +(Misiones, +Salta +, +Santiago del Estero +, +Chaco +, +Entre Ríos +, and +Buenos Aires +), and +Uruguay +( +Monné 2024a +; +Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023 +). +Viana (1972) +recorded this species from the Argentinean department of Corrientes, which was omitted in +Monné 2024a +). + + + + +Material examined. + +BRAZIL +, + +Mato Grosso do Sul + +( +new state record +): +Dourados +, +Zona Rural +—UFGD, +22°11’38.7”S +54°55’16”W +, +1 female +(MNRJ-ENT-47338), + +09.V.2012 + +, +D.G. Ribeiro +leg. ( +MNRJ +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455147FFFD70C8FF01FCC16F59.xml b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455147FFFD70C8FF01FCC16F59.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b6a8c63fd5c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455147FFFD70C8FF01FCC16F59.xml @@ -0,0 +1,522 @@ + + + +Notes, new records, and transference in South American Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) + + + +Author + +Olivier, Renan Da Silva +Laboratório de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, 79090 - 900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil + + + +Author + +Santos-Silva, Antonio +Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil + + + +Author + +Monné, Marcela Laura +Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940 - 040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Costa-Pinto, Paula Jéssica +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Jardim das Américas, 81530 - 000, Curitiba, PR, Brazil + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-08-21 + + +5496 + + +4 + + +451 +499 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 +1175-5326 +13617630 +CAB6E914-24D3-4B84-96F8-0CCC2CEF5390 + + + + + + + +Drychateres bilineatus +( +Olivier, 1800 +) + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 24 +) + + + + + +Cerambyx bilineatus +Olivier, 1800 + +: (67) 17. + + + + +Trachyderes bilineatus + +; + +Dalman, 1817: 366 + +. + + + + + +Drychateres bilineatus + +; + +Hüdepohl, 1985: 65 + +. + + + + + + +Trachyderes scabricollis +Dalman, 1823: 64 + + +. + + + + + + +Trachyderes dejeanii +Dupont, 1838: 15 + + +. + + + + + + +Trachyderes solieri +Dupont, 1838: 16 + + +. + + + + + + +Trachyderes duponti +Dupont, 1838: 17 + + +. + + + + + + +Trachyderes olivieri +Dupont, 1838: 18 + + +. + + + + + + +Trachyderes puncticollis +Dupont, 1838: 20 + + +. + + + + + +Trachyderes bilineatus +ab. +puncticollis + +; + +Aurivillius, 1912: 479 + +. + + + + + + +Trachyderes vauthieri +Dupont, 1838: 22 + + +. + + + + + + +Trachyderes dorbignyi +Dupont, 1838: 23 + + +. + + + + + + +Trachyderes nigripennis +Dupont, 1838: 24 + + +. + + + + + + +Trachyderes signaticollis +Dupont, 1838: 25 + + +. + + + + + +Remarks. +Monné (2024a) +and +Tavakilian & Chevillotte (2023) +reported + +Cerambyx bilineatus + +as having been described in 1795. However, according to +Bousquet (2016) +: “This volume [4] is usually dated 1795, the date on the title page. However, due to a diplomatic and scientific mission of Olivier to the +Ottoman Empire +, livraison 23, which comprised about 3/4 of the volume (? starting at page 81 of Capricorne), was published in 1800. It was recorded on the Fructidor an VIII (= +18 August–22 September 1800 +) issue of the + +Journal général de la Littérature de +France + +.” + + + +Cerambyx bilineatus + +was probably described based on a single specimen. According to +Monné (2024a) +and +Tavakilian & Chevillotte (2023) +, the +holotype +is a female. +Olivier (1800) +did not know where it was from. + + +Dalman (1823) +described + +Trachyderes scabricollis + +based on a single specimen with type locality ignored. +Dupont (1838) +described + +Trachyderes dejeanii + +based, apparently, on a single specimen from +Brazil +; + +Trachyderes solieri + +based, apparently, on a single specimen from +Brazil +; + +Trachyderes duponti + +based, apparently, on a single specimen from +Brazil +; + +Trachyderes olivieri + +based, apparently, on a single specimen from +Brazil +( +Bahia +); + +Trachyderes puncticollis + +from +Argentina +(Cordoba); + +Trachyderes vauthieri + +based on a single male from +Brazil +; + +Trachyderes dorbignyi + +based on a single specimen from southern +Brazil +; + +Trachyderes nigripennis + +based on a single specimen from southern +Brazil +; and + +Trachyderes signaticollis + +based on at least +two syntypes +from southern +Brazil +.According to +Monné (2024a) +and +Tavakilian and Chevillotte (2023) +, + +T. signaticollis + +was described based on a +holotype +. However, +Dupont (1838) +reported: “Nota. Nous avons vu une variété de cette espèce don’t le corselet était presque entièrement noirâtre [Note. We saw a variety of this species whose pronotum was almost entirely blackish].” +Bates (1870b) +synonymized + +T. scabricollis + +, + +T. dejeanii + +, + +T. solieri + +, and + +T. duponti + +with + +T. bilineatus + +. +Aurivillius (1912) +considered + +T. puncticollis + +as just an aberration of + +T. bilineatus + +; thus, he synonymized this species with + +T. bilineatus + +. +Monné & Martins (1973) +synonymized + +T. dorbygnyi + +, + +T. nigripennis + +, + +T. signaticollis + +, and + +T. vauthieri + +with + +T. bilineatus + +. +Martins (1975) +synonymized + +T. olivieri + +with + +T. bilineatus + +. + + +Currently, it is known from +Venezuela +, +Brazil +( +Rondônia +, +Maranhão +, +Mato Grosso +, +Goiás +, +Rio Grande do Norte +, +Paraíba +, +Bahia +, +Minas Gerais +, +Espírito Santo +, +Rio de Janeiro +, +São Paulo +, +Paraná +, +Santa Catarina +, and +Rio Grande do Sul +), +Bolivia +( +Santa Cruz +), +Paraguay +, +Argentina +( +Catamarca +, +Santiago del Estero +, Córdoba, +San Luís +, and +Chaco +), and +Uruguay +( +Monné 2024a +; +Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023 +). +Zajciw (1966) +listed the Brazilian state of Ceará, which was omitted in +Monné (2024a) +. + + + + +Material examined. + +BRAZIL +, + +Mato Grosso do Sul + +( +new state record +): +Campo Grande +, +1 specimen +( +ZUFMS- +COL-00618), + +14.X.2007 + +, +D.M.C. Alcântara +leg. ( +ZUFMS +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45514AFFF770C8F9ADFAB0688F.xml b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45514AFFF770C8F9ADFAB0688F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..539bd5371ea --- /dev/null +++ b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45514AFFF770C8F9ADFAB0688F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,198 @@ + + + +Notes, new records, and transference in South American Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) + + + +Author + +Olivier, Renan Da Silva +Laboratório de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, 79090 - 900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil + + + +Author + +Santos-Silva, Antonio +Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil + + + +Author + +Monné, Marcela Laura +Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940 - 040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Costa-Pinto, Paula Jéssica +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Jardim das Américas, 81530 - 000, Curitiba, PR, Brazil + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-08-21 + + +5496 + + +4 + + +451 +499 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 +1175-5326 +13617630 +CAB6E914-24D3-4B84-96F8-0CCC2CEF5390 + + + + + + + +Hovorodon subcancellatus +(Thomson, 1867) + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 3 +) + + + + + + + +Mallodon subcancellatum +Thomson, 1867a: 102 + + +. + + + + + +Stenodontes +( +Nothopleurus +) +subcancellatus + +; + +Lameere, 1915: 51 + +. + + + + + +Nothopleurus subcancellatus + +; + +Fragoso & Monné, 1995: 222 + +. + + + + + +Hovorodon subcancellatum + +; + +Santos-Silva, Swift & Nearns, 2010: 28 + +. + + + + + +Remarks. +This species was described based on +syntypes +males (two, according to +Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023 +) from +Brazil +. Currently, it is known from +Brazil +( +Bahia +, +Minas Gerais +, +Espírito Santo +, +Rio de Janeiro +, +São Paulo +, and +Santa Catarina +) ( +Monné 2024c +; +Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023 +). + + + + +Material examined. +BRAZIL +, + +Mato Grosso do Sul + +( +new state record +): Porto Murtinho, Fazenda Anahi, + +21°42’28.3”S +57°44’35.7”W +, +1 specimen +(ZUFMS-COL-00899), + +28.X.2022 + +, +T.R.F. Sinani +leg. ( +ZUFMS +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45514CFFF670C8FAACFF0D6F8C.xml b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45514CFFF670C8FAACFF0D6F8C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0397a1ee4c9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45514CFFF670C8FAACFF0D6F8C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,268 @@ + + + +Notes, new records, and transference in South American Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) + + + +Author + +Olivier, Renan Da Silva +Laboratório de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, 79090 - 900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil + + + +Author + +Santos-Silva, Antonio +Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil + + + +Author + +Monné, Marcela Laura +Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940 - 040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Costa-Pinto, Paula Jéssica +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Jardim das Américas, 81530 - 000, Curitiba, PR, Brazil + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-08-21 + + +5496 + + +4 + + +451 +499 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 +1175-5326 +13617630 +CAB6E914-24D3-4B84-96F8-0CCC2CEF5390 + + + + + + + +Megacyllene falsa +( +Chevrolat, 1862 +) + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 7 +) + + + + + + + +Cyllene falsa +Chevrolat, 1862: 51 + + +. + + + + + +Clytus falsus + +; + +Gemminger, 1872: 2928 + +. + + + + + +Megacyllene falsa + +; + + +Costa +Lima +, 1955: 108 + + +. + + + + + +Megacyllene +( +Megacyllene +) +falsa + +; + +Di Iorio, 1997: 388 + +. + + + + + +Clytus acutus + +; + +Laporte & Gory, 1836: 9 + +(misidentification). + + + + + +Remarks. +This species was described based on a single specimen from +Brazil +. Currently, it is known from +Brazil +( +Goiás +, +Bahia +, +Minas Gerais +, +Espírito Santo +, +Rio de Janeiro +, +São Paulo +, +Paraná +, +Santa Catarina +, and +Rio Grande do Sul +), +Paraguay +, +Argentina +(Misiones, +Formosa +, and +Entre Ríos +), and +Uruguay +( +Monné 2024a +; +Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023 +). +Viana (1972) +listed the Brazilian state of Mato Grosso and + +Martins +et al. +(2014) + +listed the Brazilian state of Ceará, both not reported by +Monné (2024a) +. + + + + +Material examined. + +BRAZIL +, + +Mato Grosso do Sul + +( +new state record +): +Dourados +, +22°14’23.2”S +54°59’13”W +, + +389 m + +, +Malaise +1, +1 male +(MNRJ-ENT-47308), + +14.VIII-28.VIII.2012 + +, +T.S. Teles +leg. ( +MNRJ +); + + +Dourados, +22°13’30.9”S +55°00’32.2”W +, + +401 m + +, +Malaise +8, +1 male +(MNRJ-ENT-47309), + +11.IX-25.IX.2012 + +, +T.S. Teles +leg. ( +MNRJ +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45514DFFF670C8FB7BFF0D68A3.xml b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45514DFFF670C8FB7BFF0D68A3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bce127d5c79 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45514DFFF670C8FB7BFF0D68A3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,347 @@ + + + +Notes, new records, and transference in South American Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) + + + +Author + +Olivier, Renan Da Silva +Laboratório de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, 79090 - 900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil + + + +Author + +Santos-Silva, Antonio +Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil + + + +Author + +Monné, Marcela Laura +Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940 - 040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Costa-Pinto, Paula Jéssica +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Jardim das Américas, 81530 - 000, Curitiba, PR, Brazil + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-08-21 + + +5496 + + +4 + + +451 +499 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 +1175-5326 +13617630 +CAB6E914-24D3-4B84-96F8-0CCC2CEF5390 + + + + + + + +Sphallotrichus bidens +( +Fabricius, 1802 +) + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 5 +) + + + + + + + +Cerambyx bidens +Fabricius, 1802: 271 + + +. + + + + + +Coleoxestia bidens + +; + +Aurivillius, 1912: 64 + +. + + + + +Sphallotrichus bidens + +; Fragoso, 1995: 182. + + + +Cerambyx lugubris +Voet, 1806: 27 + +(nomen nudum +). + + + + +? +Sphallenum lugubre + +; + +Aurivillius, 1912: 64 + +. + + + + + +Sphallotrichus lugubre + +; + +Fragoso, 1982: 145 + +. + + + + + + +Criodion castanopterum +Erichson, 1849: 571 + + +. + + + + +Sphallenum castanopterum + +; Bates, 1870: 255. + + + + +Sphallotrichus castanopterum + +; + +Fragoso, 1982: 145 + +. + + + + + + +Sphallenum femorale +Bates, 1870a: 254 + + +. + + + + + +Sphallotrichus femorale + +; + +Fragoso, 1982: 145 + +. + + + + + +Remarks. +Fabricius (1802) +(not 1801—see date in +Bousquet (2016)) +described + +Cerambyx bidens + +from “ +America +meridionali” (no further details) based on unknown number of specimens. +Zimsen (1964) +reported the existence of +two specimens +: “ +Cerambyx bidens Syst. El. II +p. 271—25 “in +America +meridionali D. Smidt Mus. D. de Schestedt”.—Copenhagen +1 specimen +. (Kiel +1 specimen +).” +Erichson (1849) +described + +C. castanopterum + +based on a single specimen from +Guyana +. +Bates (1870a) +described + +S. femorale + +based on +syntypes +male and female (at least a couple) from +Brazil +(Lower Amazons). Fragoso (1995) synonymized + +C. castanopterum + +and + +S. femorale + +with + +Sphallotrichus bidens + +, and designated a specimen from +Brazil +(Pará, Tapajós) as +lectotype +of + +S. femorale + +. + + +Currently, it is known from +Venezuela +( +Aragua +, +Bolívar +, and +Tachira +), +Colombia +, +French Guiana +, +Guyana +, +Brazil +( +Amapá +, Amazonas, Pará, +Mato Grosso +, +Maranhão +, +Bahia +, +Minas Gerais +, +São Paulo +, and +Santa Catarina +), and +Bolivia +( +Santa Cruz +) ( +Monné 2024a +; +Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023 +). + + + + +Material examined. + +BRAZIL +, + +Mato Grosso do Sul + +( +new state record +): +Dourados +, +Fazenda Recanto +, +21°50’37.89”S +55°00’30.55”W +, + +324 m + +, +1 female +(MNRJ-ENT-47302), +P.P. Bellon +, +C.M. Ishimi +, +M. Carneiro +, leg. ( +MNRJ +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45514EFFF470C8FDFCFB3D6C93.xml b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45514EFFF470C8FDFCFB3D6C93.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a25bebc2a3c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45514EFFF470C8FDFCFB3D6C93.xml @@ -0,0 +1,315 @@ + + + +Notes, new records, and transference in South American Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) + + + +Author + +Olivier, Renan Da Silva +Laboratório de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, 79090 - 900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil + + + +Author + +Santos-Silva, Antonio +Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil + + + +Author + +Monné, Marcela Laura +Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940 - 040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Costa-Pinto, Paula Jéssica +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Jardim das Américas, 81530 - 000, Curitiba, PR, Brazil + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-08-21 + + +5496 + + +4 + + +451 +499 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 +1175-5326 +13617630 +CAB6E914-24D3-4B84-96F8-0CCC2CEF5390 + + + + + + + +Gnomidolon varians +Gounelle, 1909 + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 11 +) + + + + + + + +Gnomidolon varians +Gounelle, 1909: 662 + + +. + + + + + +Gnomidolon varians varians + +; + +Martins, 1967: 258 + +. + + + + + + +Gnomidolon addictum +Melzer, 1935: 175 + + +. + + + + + +Gnomidolon varians addictum + +; + +Martins, 1967: 264 + +. + + + + + + +Gnomidolon micans +Fisher, 1937: 146 + + +. + + + + + + +Gnomidolon micans +var. +brunneicaudatum +Fisher, 1937: 147 + + +. + + + + + +Remarks. +Gounelle (1909) +described + +G. varians + +based on +syntypes +males and females (33, according to +Martins 1967 +) from +Brazil +( +Goiás +, +Bahia +, +Minas Gerais +, +São Paulo +). +Melzer (1935) +described + +G. addictum + +from +Brazil +( +São Paulo +, +Santa Catarina +), which was considered as subspecies of + +G. varians + +by +Martins (1967) +. Later, +Martins (2006) +synonymized + +G. addictum + +with + +G. varians + +. +Fisher (1937) +described + +G. micans + +and + +G. micans +var. +brunneicaudatum + +from +Brazil +( +Santa Catarina +), both synonymized with + +G. varians + +by +Martins (1967) +. + + +Currently, it is known from +Brazil +( +Goiás +, +Mato Grosso +, +Paraíba +, +Bahia +, +Minas Gerais +, +Espírito Santo +, +Rio de Janeiro +, +São Paulo +, +Paraná +, +Santa Catarina +, and +Rio Grande do Sul +), +Bolivia +( +Santa Cruz +), +Paraguay +, +Argentina +( +Salta +, Misiones, +Entre Ríos +, and +Buenos Aires +), and +Uruguay +( +Monné 2024a +; +Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023 +). + + + + +Material examined. + +BRAZIL +, + +Mato Grosso do Sul + +( +new state record +): +Dourados +, +22°12’42.2”S +54°41’36.7”W +, + +387 m + +, +Malaise +34, 1 macho (MNRJ-ENT-47326), + +08.XII–22.XII.2012 + +, +T.S. Teles +leg. ( +MNRJ +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45514FFFF570C8FEF9FA896B12.xml b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45514FFFF570C8FEF9FA896B12.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..adaba2acafa --- /dev/null +++ b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45514FFFF570C8FEF9FA896B12.xml @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@ + + + +Notes, new records, and transference in South American Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) + + + +Author + +Olivier, Renan Da Silva +Laboratório de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, 79090 - 900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil + + + +Author + +Santos-Silva, Antonio +Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil + + + +Author + +Monné, Marcela Laura +Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940 - 040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Costa-Pinto, Paula Jéssica +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Jardim das Américas, 81530 - 000, Curitiba, PR, Brazil + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-08-21 + + +5496 + + +4 + + +451 +499 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 +1175-5326 +13617630 +CAB6E914-24D3-4B84-96F8-0CCC2CEF5390 + + + + + + + +Nephalius spiniger +( +Blanchard, 1847 +) + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 8 +) + + + + + + + +Miopteryx spiniger +Blanchard, 1847: 209 + + +. + + + + + +Sphaerion spinigerum + +; + +Burmeister, 1865: 167 + +. + + + + + +Periboeum spinigerum + +; + +Gemminger, 1872: 2824 + +. + + + + + +Nephalius spiniger + +; + +Martins, 2005: 99 + +. + + + + + +Remarks. +This species was described based on a single specimen from +Bolivia +( +Santa Cruz +). +Blanchard (1847) +did not indicate the sex of the +holotype +. However, based on the original description and figure, it is a male, as supposed by +Martins (2005) +and formalized in +Monné (2024a) +and +Tavakilian & Chevillotte (2023) +. + + +Currently, it is known from +Brazil +( +Goiás +and +Mato Grosso +), +Bolivia +( +Santa Cruz +, +Tarija +), +Paraguay +, +Argentina +( +Catamarca +, La Rioja, +Santiago del Estero +, Córdoba, +Mendoza +, and +Buenos Aires +), and +Uruguay +( +Monné 2024a +; +Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023 +). + + + + +Material examined. + +BRAZIL +, + +Mato Grosso do Sul + +( +new state record +): +Campo Grande +, +Chácara Vida Nova +, +20°34’04.8”S +54°40’18.2”W +, + +494 m + +, +1 specimen +(ZUFMS-COL-00629), + +15.X.2007 + +, +J.E. Maier +leg. ( +ZUFMS +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455152FFEF70C8F867FEDD6CD4.xml b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455152FFEF70C8F867FEDD6CD4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f01902a5460 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455152FFEF70C8F867FEDD6CD4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,390 @@ + + + +Notes, new records, and transference in South American Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) + + + +Author + +Olivier, Renan Da Silva +Laboratório de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, 79090 - 900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil + + + +Author + +Santos-Silva, Antonio +Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil + + + +Author + +Monné, Marcela Laura +Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940 - 040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Costa-Pinto, Paula Jéssica +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Jardim das Américas, 81530 - 000, Curitiba, PR, Brazil + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-08-21 + + +5496 + + +4 + + +451 +499 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 +1175-5326 +13617630 +CAB6E914-24D3-4B84-96F8-0CCC2CEF5390 + + + + + + + +Adetus analis +( +Haldeman, 1847 +) + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 52 +) + + + + + + + +Polyopsia analis +Haldeman, 1847: 55 + + +. + + + + + +Adetus analis + +; + +LeConte, 1852: 161 + +. + + + + + + +Agennopsis mutica +Thomson, 1857b: 302 + + +. + + + + + +Adetus muticus + +; + +Bates, 1872: 234 + +(syn.). + + + + + + +Agennopsis pygaea +Bates, 1866: 295 + + +. + + + + + +Adetus pygaeus + +; + +Gemminger, 1873: 3099 + +. + + + + + + +Agennopsis mexicana +Thomson, 1868c: 153 + + +. + + + + + +Remarks. + +Polyopsia analis + +was described based on +holotype +from the + +United States of +America + +(Pennsylvania). +Thomson (1857b) +described + +Agennopsis mutica + +based on a single specimen from +Brazil +. +Bates (1866) +described + +Agennopsis pygmaea + +based on +syntypes +male and female from +Brazil +(Pará, +Rio de Janeiro +). Finally, +Thomson (1868c) +described + +Agennopsis mexicana + +based on a single specimen from +Mexico +. +Bates (1872) +reported: “ + +Adetus muticus + +( + +Agennopsis mutica +, Thomson + +…).—Generally distributed throughout Tropical +America +. I can detect no important difference between specimens from Chontales, the Amazons, and Rio de Janeiro. + +Adetus analis +, Leconte + +, = + +Polyopsia analis +, Haldem. + +, which is stated by Leconte to be a South American insect, may possibly be this species. + +Agennopsis mexicana +, Thoms. + +(Physis II. P. 153) is certainly the same.” “May possibly be” cannot be considered a formal synonymy but just a supposition. However, it is possible to conclude that +Bates (1872) +synonymized + +Agennopsis mexicana + +with + +Adetus muticus + +. +Bates (1880) +considered + +Agennopsis pygaea + +and + +Agennopsis mexicanus + +[ +sic +] the same as + +Adetus muticus + +. Formally, + +Adetus muticus + +was never synonymized with + +A. analis + +. The former appears in the synonym of the latter from + +Chemsak +et al. +(1992) + +, who only listed + +“ +muticus + +,” “ +pygmaeus +[ +sic +],” and + +“ +mexicana + +” in the synonym of + +A. analis + +. They probably considered that +Bates (1872) +had made the formal synonymy. + + +Currently, it is known from the + +United States of +America + +(the occurrence in this country needs to be confirmed or refuted after examination of the +holotype +), +Mexico +, +Guatemala +, +Honduras +, +Nicaragua +, +Costa Rica +, +Panama +, +Colombia +, +Venezuela +, +French Guiana +, +Peru +, +Bolivia +, +Brazil +(Pará, +Maranhão +, +Bahia +, +Minas Gerais +, +Espírito Santo +, +Rio de Janeiro +, +São Paulo +, +Paraná +, +Santa Catarina +, +Rio Grande do Sul +), +Argentina +( +Santiago del Estero +) ( +Monné 2024b +; +Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023 +). + + + + +Material examined. + +BRAZIL +, + +Mato Grosso do Sul + +( +new state record +): +Campo Grande +, CNPGC [Centro Nacional de Pesquisas de Gado de Corte—EMBRAPA], +1 female +(MNRJ-ENT-47652), + +06.XI.1976 + +, +W.W. Koller +leg. ( +MNRJ +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455153FFE870C8FBF1FD0B698B.xml b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455153FFE870C8FBF1FD0B698B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..09114f109a4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455153FFE870C8FBF1FD0B698B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,441 @@ + + + +Notes, new records, and transference in South American Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) + + + +Author + +Olivier, Renan Da Silva +Laboratório de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, 79090 - 900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil + + + +Author + +Santos-Silva, Antonio +Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil + + + +Author + +Monné, Marcela Laura +Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940 - 040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Costa-Pinto, Paula Jéssica +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Jardim das Américas, 81530 - 000, Curitiba, PR, Brazil + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-08-21 + + +5496 + + +4 + + +451 +499 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 +1175-5326 +13617630 +CAB6E914-24D3-4B84-96F8-0CCC2CEF5390 + + + + + + + +Acrocinus longimanus +( +Linnaeus, 1758 +) + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 49 +) + + + + + + + +Cerambyx longimanus +Linnaeus, 1758: 388 + + +. + + + + + +Prionus longimanus + +; + +Fabricius, 1775: 159 + +. + + + +522; +Gronovius, 1764: 159 +. + + + + +Macropus longimanus + +; + +Thunberg, 1805: 282 + +. + + + + + +Acrocinus longimanus + +; + +Illiger, 1806: 247 + +. + + + + + + +Macropus pictus +Leach, 1815: 84 + + +. + + + + + +Remarks. + +Cerambyx longimanus + +was described based on +syntypes +: from + +America ( +Linnaeus 1758 +) + +; +Jamaica +( +Sloane 1725: 209 +); West Indies ( +Grew 1681: 163 +, pl. 13); +Suriname +( +Merian 1719: 23 +, pl. 28); unknown ( +Vincent 1719 +: pl. 1); probably from +Suriname +( +Rösel 1749 +: Terrestrium II pl. I). According to Santos-Silva +et al. +(2020): “…the type locality of the +syntypes +is “ +America +”, “West-Indies”, and “ +Surinam +”, and not only “ +America +” as has been reported in catalogs.” +Leach (1815) +transferred + +Acrocinus longimanus + +to + +Macropus +Thunberg, 1805 + +(not + +Macropus +Shaw, 1790 + +), provided an unnecessary replacement name, + +Macropus pictus + +, and reported it from South +America +. +Monné (2024b) +listed the work by Leach as published in 1814. However, according to +Bousquet (2016) +: “ +Vol. II. +154 pp. + pls 61–120. [DP: 1815 (title page), +December 1815 +(Evenhuis 1997b: 443)].” According to +Tavakilian & Chevillotte (2023) +, +Gronovius (1764: 159) +listed + +Lamia longimana + +. However, +Gronovius (1764) +did not name the species and only refers to it as a number (522). In the index in +Gronovius (1781) +, it is mentioned as +“Longimanus +.” Actually, it was +Latreille (1807) +who first included the species in + +Lamia +Fabricius, 1775 + +, but without formally using + +Lamia longimana + +: “Lamiae propriae. Les Lamies propres … +Macropi +Thunberg; +Prionorum +Olivier division prima. Les + +Macropes +de Thumberg + +; la première division des +Priones +d’Olivier. + +Cerambyx longimanus + +. Linn., Fab.” “ + +Lamia longimana + +” appears formally in +Schönherr (1817: 347) +, in the synonymic list of + +Acrocinus longimanus + +. +Monné (2024b) +listed: “ + +Lamia longimana + +; Gronovan, 1781: 159.” However, Laurens Theodorus Gronow always used “Gronovius” in his works. Furthermore, the year of the publication is 1764, and not 1781. + + +Currently, it is known from +Mexico +( +Jalisco +, +Veracruz +, +Chiapas +, +Colima +, +Oaxaca +, +Campeche +, +Querétaro +, +San Luís Potosí +, +Sinaloa +, +Tabasco +, and +Yucatán +), +Belize +, +Guatemala +, +Honduras +, +El Salvador +, +Nicaragua +, +Costa Rica +, +Panama +, +Trinidad and Tobago +, +Colombia +( +Antioquia +, +Magdalena +, +Tolima +, +Valle del Cauca +, +Cundinamarca +, +Huila +, +Caldas +, +Santander +, +Risaralda +, and +Putumayo +), +Venezuela +, +Ecuador +, +Suriname +, +French Guiana +, +Guyana +, +Brazil +(Amazonas, Pará, +Mato Grosso +, +Goiás +, +Bahia +, +Minas Gerais +, +Espírito Santo +, +Rio de Janeiro +, +São Paulo +, +Paraná +, and +Rio Grande do Sul +), +Peru +, +Bolivia +( +Beni +, La Paz, and +Santa Cruz +), +Paraguay +, and +Argentina +(Misiones, +Corrientes +) ( +Monné 2024b +; +Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023 +). + +Souza +et al. +(2020) + +reported it from the Brazilian state of Rondônia, which was omitted in +Monné (2024b) +; + +Niño-Maldonado +et al. +(2023) + +reported the Mexican states of Nayarit, Quintana Roo, and Hidalgo, which are not listed in +Monné (2024b) +. + + + + +Material examined. + +BRAZIL +, + +Mato Grosso do Sul + +( +new state record +): +Campo Grande +, +1 female +( +ZUFMS- +COL-00581), + +19.V.1984 + +, +R. Toledo +, R. leg. ( +ZUFMS +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455158FFE270C8FEB1FB5B6CFF.xml b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455158FFE270C8FEB1FB5B6CFF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ce82892c28c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455158FFE270C8FEB1FB5B6CFF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,329 @@ + + + +Notes, new records, and transference in South American Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) + + + +Author + +Olivier, Renan Da Silva +Laboratório de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, 79090 - 900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil + + + +Author + +Santos-Silva, Antonio +Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil + + + +Author + +Monné, Marcela Laura +Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940 - 040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Costa-Pinto, Paula Jéssica +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Jardim das Américas, 81530 - 000, Curitiba, PR, Brazil + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-08-21 + + +5496 + + +4 + + +451 +499 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 +1175-5326 +13617630 +CAB6E914-24D3-4B84-96F8-0CCC2CEF5390 + + + + + + + +Compsibidion vanum +(Thomson, 1867) + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 27 +) + + + + + + + +Ibidion +( +Compsibidion +) +vanum +Thomson, 1867b: 151 + + +. + + + + + +Ibidion vanum + +; + +Gemminger, 1872: 2830 + +. + + + + + +Compsa vana + +; + +Gounelle, 1909: 668 + +. + + + + + +Compsibidion vanum + +; + +Martins, 1965: 92 + +. + + + + + + +Compsa histrionica +Bates, 1870a: 302 + + +. + + + + + +Compsibidion histrionicum + +; + +Martins, 1965: 93 + +. + + + + + +Remarks. +Thomson (1864) +described + +Ibidion +( +Compsibidion +) +vanum + +based on a single specimen from +French Guiana +. Later, +Bates (1870a) +described + +Compsa histrionica + +based on a single female from +Brazil +(Amazonas). Martins & +Galileo (2007) +reported the +holotype +of + +C. histrionica + +as being female, but in doubt; +Monné (2024a) +as being male; and +Tavakilian & Chevillotte (2023) +did not indicate the sex. However, +Bates (1870a) +reported: “Long. 5 lin. [symbol of female] … The specimen is a female.” + + +Currently, it is known from +Mexico +( +Jalisco +, +Veracruz +, +Chiapas +, and +Tabasco +), +Guatemala +( +San Marcos +and +Escuintla +), +El Salvador +, +Nicaragua +, +Costa Rica +( +Limón +and +Cartago +), +Panama +( +Panama +. +Colón +, Canal Zone, and +Darién +), +Venezuela +( +Monagas +and +Bolívar +), +Guyana +, +French Guiana +, +Peru +, +Brazil +(Amazonas, Pará, +Mato Grosso +, +Goiás +, +Maranhão +, +Alagoas +, +Ceará +, +Bahia +, +Minas Gerais +, +Espírito Santo +, +Rio de Janeiro +, +São Paulo +, +Paraná +, +Santa Catarina +, and +Rio Grande do Sul +), +Paraguay +, and +Argentina +(Misiones) ( +Monné 2024a +; +Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023 +). + +Paz +et al. +(2008) + +reported this species from the Brazilian state of Piauí, which was omitted in +Monné (2024a) +. + + + + +Material examined. + +BRAZIL +, + +Mato Grosso do Sul + +( +new state record +): +Dourados +, +22°16’43.8”S +54°54’10.5”W +, + +409 m + +, Malaise 60, +1 female +(MNRJ-ENT-47317), + +19.II-05.III.2013 + +, +T.S. Teles +leg. ( +MNRJ +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45515BFFE070C8FAB7FB566ADF.xml b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45515BFFE070C8FAB7FB566ADF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..73b3cd84f24 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45515BFFE070C8FAB7FB566ADF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,381 @@ + + + +Notes, new records, and transference in South American Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) + + + +Author + +Olivier, Renan Da Silva +Laboratório de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, 79090 - 900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil + + + +Author + +Santos-Silva, Antonio +Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil + + + +Author + +Monné, Marcela Laura +Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940 - 040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Costa-Pinto, Paula Jéssica +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Jardim das Américas, 81530 - 000, Curitiba, PR, Brazil + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-08-21 + + +5496 + + +4 + + +451 +499 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 +1175-5326 +13617630 +CAB6E914-24D3-4B84-96F8-0CCC2CEF5390 + + + + + + + +Paromoeocerus barbicornis +( +Fabricius, 1792 +) + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 31 +) + + + + + +Saperda barbicornis +Fabricius, 1793: 311 + +. + + + + +Callidium barbicorne + +; + +Schönherr, 1817: 456 + +. + + + + + +Compsocerus barbicornis + +; + +Lacordaire, 1830: 175 + +. + + + + + +Orthostoma barbicorne + +; + +White, 1853: 147 + +. + + + + + +Paromoeocerus barbicornis + +; + +Gounelle, 1910: 139 + +. + + + + +Saperda plumigera +Olivier, 1800 + +: (68) 13. + + + + +Paromoeocerus plumiger + +; + +Melzer, 1918: 420 + +. + + + + + + +Cosmisoma equestre +Guérin-Méneville, 1844: 231 + + +. + + + + + +Compsocerus equestris + +; + +Lacordaire, 1869: 37 + +. + + + + + +Cosmosoma equestre + +; + +Gemminger, 1872: 2949 + +. + + + + + + +Cosmisoma equestris +Burmeister, 1865: 170 + + +. + + + + + +Remarks. + +Saperda barbicornis + +was described, apparently, based on a single specimen with unknown type locality. +Olivier (1800) +described + +Saperda plumigera + +based, apparently, on a single specimen ( +holotype +, according to +Monné (2024a)) +and +Tavakilian & Chevillotte (2023)) +from +Madagascar +. Later, +Guérin-Méneville (1844) +described + +Cosmisoma equestre + +based on +syntypes +from +Argentina +and +Uruguay +. +Gounelle (1910) +synonymized + +Saperda plumigera + +and + +Cosmisoma equestre + +with + +S. barbicornis + +. However, +Schönherr (1817: 456) +already formalized the synonym between + +S. plumigera + +and + +S. barbicornis + +. In +Monné (2024a) +and +Tavakilian & Chevillotte (2023) +, + +Saperda barbicornis + +is considered to have been described in 1793. However, according to +Bousquet (2016) +on the date of the work in which Fabricius described + +Saperda barbicornis + +: “As discussed by Löbl and Smetana (2011: 21), Hellwig (1792: 408) cited the correct page and number for the genus + +Lyctus + +in the second part of Fabricius’ book, clearly suggesting that he had Fabricius’ book in front of him. The cover of the issue for Hellwig’s paper in the journal +Neuestes Magazin für die Liebhaber der Entomologie +bears the date “ +Dezember 1792 +.” In addition, the cover of the journal (available on GB) has a text dated “Stralsund im +December 1792 +” which mentioned that the second part of Fabricius’ +Entomologia systematica +is published. Therefore, it is assumed that Fabricius’ second part of the first volume of his +Entomologia systematica +was published in or before +December 1792 +.” + + +Currently, it is known from +Brazil +( +Bahia +, +Minas Gerais +, +Espírito Santo +, +Rio de Janeiro +, +São Paulo +, +Paraná +, +Santa Catarina +, and +Rio Grande do Sul +), +Paraguay +, +Argentina +( +Jujuy +, +Salta +, +Tucumán +, Misiones, +Chaco +, +Santa Fé +, +Corrientes +, +Entre Ríos +, and +Buenos Aires +), and +Uruguay +( +Monné 2024a +; +Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023 +). + + + + +Material examined. + +BRAZIL +, + +Mato Grosso do Sul + +( +new state record +): +Dourados +, +22°13’30.9”S +55°00’32.2”W +, + +401 m + +, Malaise 8, +1 female +(MNRJ-ENT-47322), + +11.IX-25.IX.2012 + +, +T.S. Teles +leg. ( +MNRJ +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45515BFFE170C8FF49FD506A69.xml b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45515BFFE170C8FF49FD506A69.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a317e1be3d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45515BFFE170C8FF49FD506A69.xml @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@ + + + +Notes, new records, and transference in South American Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) + + + +Author + +Olivier, Renan Da Silva +Laboratório de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, 79090 - 900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil + + + +Author + +Santos-Silva, Antonio +Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil + + + +Author + +Monné, Marcela Laura +Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940 - 040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Costa-Pinto, Paula Jéssica +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Jardim das Américas, 81530 - 000, Curitiba, PR, Brazil + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-08-21 + + +5496 + + +4 + + +451 +499 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 +1175-5326 +13617630 +CAB6E914-24D3-4B84-96F8-0CCC2CEF5390 + + + + + + + +Minibidion punctipenne +Martins, 1968 + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 29 +) + + + + + + +Ibidion +( +Brydaeon +) +comatum + +; + +Gounelle, 1909: 677 + +(misidentification). + + + + + + +Minibidion punctipenne +Martins, 1968: 339 + + +. + + + + + +Remarks. +This species was described based on +two specimens +from +Brazil +( +Minas Gerais +, +Goiás +). Currently, it is known from +Brazil +( +Goiás +, +Mato Grosso +, +Bahia +, +Minas Gerais +, and +São Paulo +) ( +Monné 2024a +; +Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023 +). We do not know who reported this species from the Brazilian state of +Bahia +, a state listed in +Monné (2024a) +. + + + + +Material examined. + +BRAZIL +, + +Mato Grosso do Sul + +( +new state record +): +Campo Grande +, +1 male +(MNRJ-ENT-47637), + +18.X.1978 + +, +W.W. Koller +leg. ( +MNRJ +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45515FFFE470C8FD5BFE926A22.xml b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45515FFFE470C8FD5BFE926A22.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..dbbd5074dbe --- /dev/null +++ b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45515FFFE470C8FD5BFE926A22.xml @@ -0,0 +1,241 @@ + + + +Notes, new records, and transference in South American Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) + + + +Author + +Olivier, Renan Da Silva +Laboratório de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, 79090 - 900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil + + + +Author + +Santos-Silva, Antonio +Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil + + + +Author + +Monné, Marcela Laura +Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940 - 040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Costa-Pinto, Paula Jéssica +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Jardim das Américas, 81530 - 000, Curitiba, PR, Brazil + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-08-21 + + +5496 + + +4 + + +451 +499 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 +1175-5326 +13617630 +CAB6E914-24D3-4B84-96F8-0CCC2CEF5390 + + + + + + + +Lepturges +( +Lepturges +) +melzeri +Gilmour, 1959 + +, +comb. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs 38–42 +) + + + + +FIGURES 38–42. + +Lepturges +( +Lepturges +) + +spp. +38–40) + +Lepturges +( +Lepturges +) +melzeri +Gilmour, 1959 + +, lectotype: +38) +Dorsal habitus; +39) +Head and pronotum; +40) +Prothorax, oblique habitus. +41–42) + +Lepturges +( +Lepturges +) +punctatissimus +Monné, 1976 + +, paratype male: +41) +Head and pronotum; +42) +Prothorax, oblique habitus. + + + + + + + +Lepturges humilis +Melzer, 1935: 201 + + +(not + +Lepturges humilis +Bates, 1863 + +). + + + + + + +Lepturges melzeri +Gilmour, 1959: 7 + + +. + + + + + +Urgleptes melzeri + +; + +Monné, 1976: 357 + +. + + + + + +Remarks. +Gilmour (1959) +used + +L. melzeri + +as a replacement name for + +L. humilis +Melzer, 1935 + +( +Figs 38–40 +) due to homonymy with L. + +humilis +Bates, 1863 + +. +Monné (1976) +transferred + +L. melzeri + +to + +Urgleptes +Dillon, 1956 + +. However, the punctures on the posterior area of the pronotum ( +Figs 39–40 +) do not extend toward the sides of the prothorax. In + +Urgleptes + +, these punctures extend clearly to the sides of the prothorax and this is the main difference between these two genera. Often, the isolated punctures on the upper part of the prothorax near the pronotum are confused with the row or rows of punctures on the pronotum. These punctures on the sides of the prothorax are relatively common in the species of + +Lepturges +( +Lepturges +) + +( +e.g. +, +Figs 41–42 +). However, these punctures on the sides of the prothorax, which are sometimes small crateriform tubercles, are not connected to the pronotal punctures. + + +Currently, it is known from +Brazil +( +Rio de Janeiro +and +São Paulo +) ( +Bezark 2024 +, +Monné 2024b +, +Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455169FFD170C8F968FC3E69AF.xml b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455169FFD170C8F968FC3E69AF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..734d03cdbac --- /dev/null +++ b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E455169FFD170C8F968FC3E69AF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,323 @@ + + + +Notes, new records, and transference in South American Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) + + + +Author + +Olivier, Renan Da Silva +Laboratório de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, 79090 - 900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil + + + +Author + +Santos-Silva, Antonio +Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil + + + +Author + +Monné, Marcela Laura +Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940 - 040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Costa-Pinto, Paula Jéssica +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Jardim das Américas, 81530 - 000, Curitiba, PR, Brazil + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-08-21 + + +5496 + + +4 + + +451 +499 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 +1175-5326 +13617630 +CAB6E914-24D3-4B84-96F8-0CCC2CEF5390 + + + + + + + +Adesmus divus +( +Chabrillac, 1857 +) + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 60 +) + + + + + + + +Hemilophus divus +Chabrillac, 1857: 200 + + +. + + + + + +Amphionycha diva + +; + +Bates, 1881: 303 + +. + + + + + +Adesmus divus + +; + +Aurivillius, 1923: 589 + +. + + + + + + +Amphionycha procera +Gahan, 1889: 399 + + +. + + + + + + +Adesmus procerus + +; +Aurivillius, 1923: 590 + + + +FIGURES 58–65. +Dorsal habitus. +58) + +Mimasyngenes lineatipennis +Breuning, 1950 + +, specimen (MZSP 61259) from Brazil (Goiás, Jataí). +59) + +Iquiracetima tuberosa +( +Belon, 1896 +) + +, specimen (MZSP 61260) from Brazil (Amazonas, Itacoatiara). +60) + +Adesmus divus +( +Chabrillac, 1857 +) + +, female from Bolivia (Santa Cruz, near Buena Vista). +61) + +Canarana brachialis +(GuérinMéneville, 1855) + +, female (MZSP 61261) from Brazil (Mato Grosso do Sul, Rio Verde de Mato Grosso). +62) + +Isomerida vittata +( +Pascoe, 1858 +) + +, specimen (MNRJ-ENT-47329) from Brazil (Mato Grosso do Sul, Dourados). +63) + +Taeniotes monnei +Santos-Silva & +Martins, 2012 + +(= + +Taeniotes amazonum +Thomson, 1857 + +), paratype male (MZSP 61269) from Brazil (Espírito Santo, Linhares). +64) + +Taeniotes orbignyi +Guérin-Méneville, 1844 + +, female (ZUFMS-COL-01407) from Brazil (Mato Grosso do Sul, Bonito). +65) + +Glypthaga arena +Galileo, Martins & Santos-Silva, 2015 + +, female (MNRJ-ENT-47634) from Brazil (Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande). + + + +Remarks. + +Hemilophus divus + +was described based on a single specimen from +Brazil +. +Chabrillac (1857) +did not specify the sex of the +holotype +. According to +Tavakilian & Chevillotte (2023) +and +Monné (2024b) +, the +holotype +is a female. +Gahan (1889) +described + +Amphionycha procera + +based on a single specimen from south +Brazil +. +Martins & Galileo (1993) +synonymized + +A. procerus + +with + +A. divus + +. Currently, it is known from +Colombia +, +Brazil +( +Mato Grosso +, +Goiás +, Distrito Federal, +Maranhão +, +Minas Gerais +, +Espírito Santo +, +Rio de Janeiro +, +São Paulo +, +Paraná +, and +Rio Grande do Sul +), +French Guiana +, +Bolivia +( +Santa Cruz +), +Paraguay +, and +Argentina +(Misiones) ( +Monné 2024b +; +Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023 +). + + + + +Material examined. + +BRAZIL +, + +Mato Grosso do Sul + +( +new state record +): Campo Grande, Pioneiros, Universidade Federal de + + +Mato Grosso do Sul +, +Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural +, +20°30’39.0”S +54°36’56.0”W +, + +556 m + +, +1 specimen +(ZUFMS-COL-00582), + +12.XII.2013 + +, +E.E. Lima +leg. ( +ZUFMS +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45516AFFD070C8FD11FF0D6E09.xml b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45516AFFD070C8FD11FF0D6E09.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..062bd0009f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45516AFFD070C8FD11FF0D6E09.xml @@ -0,0 +1,295 @@ + + + +Notes, new records, and transference in South American Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) + + + +Author + +Olivier, Renan Da Silva +Laboratório de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, 79090 - 900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil + + + +Author + +Santos-Silva, Antonio +Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil + + + +Author + +Monné, Marcela Laura +Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940 - 040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Costa-Pinto, Paula Jéssica +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Jardim das Américas, 81530 - 000, Curitiba, PR, Brazil + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-08-21 + + +5496 + + +4 + + +451 +499 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 +1175-5326 +13617630 +CAB6E914-24D3-4B84-96F8-0CCC2CEF5390 + + + + + + + +Taeniotes amazonum +Thomson, 1857 + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 63 +) + + + + + + + +Taeniotes amazonum +Thomson, 1857a: 172 + + +. + + + + + +Taeniotes scalaris + +; + +Heyne & Taschenberg, 1907: 241 + +. + + + + + + +Taeniotes scalaris +var. +azoricus +Kolbe, 1888: 180 + + +. + + + + + + +Taeniotes monnei +Martins & Santos-Silva, 2012: 50 + + +. + + + + +Taeniotes pulverulentus + +; +Dillon & Dillon, 1941 +. + + + + +Remarks. +The history of + +Taeniotes amazonum + +is very confused and complicated ( +Santos-Silva & Tavakilian 2017 +). Therefore, we will limit ourselves to providing only basic information. +Thomson (1857a) +described + +T. amazonum + +based on +syntypes +male and female from “Amazon.” +Santos-Silva & Tavakilian (2017) +designated +lectotype +and reported: “However, only the specimen chosen as +lectotype +has a label with the locality ( +Fig. 2 +: “ +Bresil +”.) +Kolbe (1888) +described + +Taeniotes scalaris +var. +azoricus + +based on +syntypes +from Azores. +Kolbe (1888) +did not specify the number of specimens. However, as he provided +Drouet (1859) +as a reference, who mentioned that the species was introduced in Azores, there were +syntypes +and not a +holotype +, as was incorrectly reported in +Sama (2006) +, +Tavakilian & Chevillotte (2023) +, and +Monné (2024b) +. +Martins & Santos-Silva (2012) +described + +T. monnei + +based on males and females from +Brazil +( +Pernambuco +, +Bahia +, +Minas Gerais +, +Espírito Santo +, +Rio de Janeiro +, +São Paulo +, +Santa Catarina +, +Rio Grande do Sul +) and +Argentina +(Misiones). +Santos-Silva & Tavakilian (2017) +synonymized + +T. scalaris azoricus + +and + +T. monnei + +with + +T. amazonum + +. + + +Currently, it is known from +Brazil +( +Pernambuco, Bahia, Minas Gerais, Espírito Santo, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Paraná, Santa Catarina +, and +Rio Grande do Sul +), +Bolivia +( +Beni and Santa Cruz +), and +Argentina +(Misiones) ( +Monné 2024b +; +Tavakilian +& +Chevillotte +). + + + + +Material examined. + +BRAZIL +, + +Mato Grosso do Sul + +( +new state record +): +Dourados +, Faz.[enda] +Coqueiro +, +22º12’28.27”S +54º55’14.79”W +, + +457 m + +, busca ativa, +1 female +(MNRJ-ENT-47318), + +06.XI.2010 + +, +J.F. Campos +leg. ( +MNRJ +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45516BFFD070C8F8E8FB2A69B4.xml b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45516BFFD070C8F8E8FB2A69B4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..23072e6b66c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45516BFFD070C8F8E8FB2A69B4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,234 @@ + + + +Notes, new records, and transference in South American Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) + + + +Author + +Olivier, Renan Da Silva +Laboratório de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, 79090 - 900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil + + + +Author + +Santos-Silva, Antonio +Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil + + + +Author + +Monné, Marcela Laura +Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940 - 040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Costa-Pinto, Paula Jéssica +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Jardim das Américas, 81530 - 000, Curitiba, PR, Brazil + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-08-21 + + +5496 + + +4 + + +451 +499 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 +1175-5326 +13617630 +CAB6E914-24D3-4B84-96F8-0CCC2CEF5390 + + + + + + + +Isomerida vittata +( +Pascoe, 1858 +) + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 62 +) + + + + + + + +Amphionycha vittata +Pascoe, 1858: 256 + + +. + + + + + +Hemilophus vittatus + +; + +Gemminger, 1873: 3210 + +. + + + + + +Adesmus vittatus + +; + +Aurivillius, 1923: 591 + +. + + + + + +Isomerida vittata + +; + +Martins & Galileo, 1992a: 188 + +. + + + + + + +Amphionycha strigata +Redtenbacher, 1868: 186 + + +. + + + + + +Remarks. + +Amphionycha vittata + +was described based on a single specimen from +Brazil +( +Espírito Santo +). Later, +Redtenbacher (1868) +described + +Amphionycha strigata + +based on +syntypes +(number of specimens not indicated) from +Brazil +( +Rio de Janeiro +). +Galileo & Martins (1996b) +synonymized + +Isomerida strigata + +with + +I. vittata + +. Currently, it is known from +Brazil +( +Bahia +, +Minas Gerais +, +Espírito Santo +, +Rio de Janeiro +, and +São Paulo +) ( +Monné 2024b +; +Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023 +). + + + + +Material examined. + +BRAZIL +, + +Mato Grosso do Sul + +( +new state record +): +Dourados +, +22°14’46.2”S +54°54’20.3”W +, + +419 m + +, Malaise 20, +1 specimen +, (MNRJ-ENT-47329), + +06.XI-20.XI.2012 + +, +T.S. Teles +leg. ( +MNRJ +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45516BFFD170C8FD51FCDE6EC7.xml b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45516BFFD170C8FD51FCDE6EC7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..74aaeef74a6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45516BFFD170C8FD51FCDE6EC7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,310 @@ + + + +Notes, new records, and transference in South American Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) + + + +Author + +Olivier, Renan Da Silva +Laboratório de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, 79090 - 900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil + + + +Author + +Santos-Silva, Antonio +Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil + + + +Author + +Monné, Marcela Laura +Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940 - 040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Costa-Pinto, Paula Jéssica +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Jardim das Américas, 81530 - 000, Curitiba, PR, Brazil + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-08-21 + + +5496 + + +4 + + +451 +499 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 +1175-5326 +13617630 +CAB6E914-24D3-4B84-96F8-0CCC2CEF5390 + + + + + + + +Canarana brachialis +( +Guérin-Méneville, 1855 +) + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 61 +) + + + + + + + +Hemilophus brachialis +Guérin-Méneville, 1855: 600 + + +. + + + + + +Spathoptera brachialis + +; + +Thomson, 1878: 16 + +. + + + + + +Adesmus brachialis + +; + +Aurivillius, 1923: 589 + +. + + + + + +Hilarolea brachialis + +; + +Soukup, 1942: 311 + +. + + + + + +Canarana brachialis + +; + +Martins & Galileo, 1992b: 443 + +. + + + + + + +Hilarolea croceicollis +Gahan, 1889: 393 + + +. + + + + + +Remarks. + +Hemilophus brachialis + +was described based on a single specimen, sex not specified, from +Ecuador +( +Napo +). According to +Tavakilian & Chevillotte (2023) +and +Monné (2024b) +the +holotype +is a female. These two authors also informed that the +holotype +is from +Ecuador +( +Napo +: Quixos). However, there is no information in the original description indicating where the specimen was collected. Actually, Cajetano Osculati, collector of the +holotype +specimen, was in several places in +Ecuador +during his stay in that country, but also stayed in +Brazil +( +e.g. +Tabatinga, +São Paulo +de Olivança, Fonte Boa, Ega (currently Tefé), Manaus, Santarém, etc.) ( +Osculati 1854 +; +Papavero 1973 +). Therefore, it is not possible to be sure even if the specimen was really collected in +Ecuador +. Perhaps an eventual information on the labels of the +holotype +may elucidate this. We did not find any information in +Osculati (1854) +that could indicate where the +holotype +of this species was collected. Later, +Gahan (1889) +described + +Hilarolea croceicollis + +based on a probable female from +Bolivia +. +Martins & Galileo (1992b) +synonymized + +H. croceicollis + +with + +Canarana brachialis + +. Currently, it is known from +Ecuador +( +Napo +), +Peru +, +Brazil +( +Mato Grosso +), and +Bolivia +(Chapare, +Cochabamba +, and +Santa Cruz +) ( +Monné 2024b +; +Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023 +). The specimen from Mato Grosso listed in +Martins & Galileo (2014) +is actually from Mato Grosso do Sul. Therefore, we are excluding this species from the fauna of the Brazilian state of Mato Grosso until a specimen is formally collected there. We are provisionally maintaining +Ecuador +as a country where this species occurs. Apparently, + +C. tuberculicollis +Guérin-Méneville, 1855 + +is just a chromatic variation of + +C. brachialis + +. The color of the femora and the shade of the color of the prothorax is variable in + +C. brachialis + +. + + + + +Material examined. + +BRAZIL +, + +Mato Grosso do Sul + +: +Campo Grande +, +1 female +(MNRJ-ENT-47643), + +04.X.1978 + +, +W.W. Koller +leg. ( +MNRJ +) + +; + +Rio Verde +[see comment on “Rio Verde” in remarks of + +Oncideres malleri +Fragoso, 1970 + +], +1 female +( +MZSP 61261 +), + +XII.1965 + +, +A. Maller +leg. ( +MZSP +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45516CFFD670C8FB83FEA36E9C.xml b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45516CFFD670C8FB83FEA36E9C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2c83bd6bf2e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/EE/1F/3E/EE1F3E45516CFFD670C8FB83FEA36E9C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,263 @@ + + + +Notes, new records, and transference in South American Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) + + + +Author + +Olivier, Renan Da Silva +Laboratório de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, 79090 - 900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil + + + +Author + +Santos-Silva, Antonio +Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil + + + +Author + +Monné, Marcela Laura +Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940 - 040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Costa-Pinto, Paula Jéssica +Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Jardim das Américas, 81530 - 000, Curitiba, PR, Brazil + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-08-21 + + +5496 + + +4 + + +451 +499 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1 +1175-5326 +13617630 +CAB6E914-24D3-4B84-96F8-0CCC2CEF5390 + + + + + + + +Oncideres vicina +Thomson, 1868 + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 69 +) + + + + + + +Oncideres heterocera + +var. + + +Vicina +Thomson, 1868a: 79 + + +. + + + + + +Oncideres +( +Oncideres +) +ulcerosa +var. +Vicina + +; + +Aurivillius, 1923: 348 + +. + + + + + +Oncideres vicina + +; + +Martins & Galileo, 1990: 91 + +. + + + + + + +Oncideres crocala +Dillon & Dillon, 1946: 317 + + +. + + + + + +Remarks. + +Oncideres heterocera + + +var. +Vicina + +was described based on a single specimen from +Brazil +. Later, +Dillon & Dillon (1946) +described + +O. crocala + +based on a single specimen from +Brazil +( +Sergipe +). +Dillon & Dillon (1946) +, following +Aurivillius (1923) +, considered + +O. heterocera +var. +vicina + +as a synonym of + +O. ulcerosa +( +Germar, 1823 +) + +. +Martins & Galileo (1990) +revalidated and considered it as a distinct species, and synonymized + +O. crocala + +with + +O. vicina + +. Currently, it is known from +Brazil +( +Maranhão +, +Alagoas +, +Sergipe +, +Paraíba +, and +Bahia +) ( +Monné 2024b +; +Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023 +). + + + + +Material examined. + +BRAZIL +, + +Mato Grosso do Sul + +( +new state record +): +Aquidauana +, +Piraputanga +, residência na beira do +Rio Aquidauana +, +20°28’04.6”S +55°29’02.4”W +, + +172 m + +, armadilha luminosa, +1 male +(ZUFMS-COL-01276), + +10.VI.2023 + +, +T.R.F. Sinani +, +K.Y. Mori +& +G. Saturno +leg. ( +ZUFMS +); + + +Same +data, +1 female +(MNRJ-ENT-47632) ( +MNRJ +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file