diff --git a/data/03/C8/87/03C887F4FFA5FFE3D7B6FE71B2E90C4A.xml b/data/03/C8/87/03C887F4FFA5FFE3D7B6FE71B2E90C4A.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..745c8030a88
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/03/C8/87/03C887F4FFA5FFE3D7B6FE71B2E90C4A.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,475 @@
+
+
+
+New species of Scapheremaeus (Acari: Oribatida: Cymbaeremaeidae) from an epiphytic environment in Morelos, Mexico
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Palacios-Vargas, José G.
+0000-0001-9097-6813
+Laboratorio de Ecología y Sistemática de Microartrópodos, Departamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX, 04510, México
+troglolaphysa@hotmail.com
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Jaimes Murillo, Kevin A.
+0009-0006-1046-4994
+Laboratorio de Ecología y Sistemática de Microartrópodos, Departamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX, 04510, México
+bio.aksel@ciencias.unam.mx
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Ojeda, Margarita
+Laboratorio de Ecología y Sistemática de Microartrópodos, Departamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX, 04510, México
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-12-23
+
+
+5556
+
+
+1
+
+
+97
+105
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5556.1.9
+
+journal article
+307640
+10.11646/zootaxa.5556.1.9
+a71e3195-40e9-41ee-8393-7a7a5a9b5587
+1175-5326
+14595399
+CCBF85BC-D314-428E-BAA1-CF474271A157
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Key for all known species of
+
+Scapheremaeus
+
+from
+Mexico
+(modified from
+
+Palacios-Vargas
+et al
+. 2022
+
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+1. Notogaster without a centrodorsal region; total body length more than two times its width; notogaster rectangular, with a transverse line separating the lenticule...
+
+Scapheremaeus alvarezius
+Ríos and Palacios-Vargas, 1998
+
+(
+Veracruz
+: Los Tuxtlas).
+
+
+
+- Notogaster with a well-defined centrodorsal region; sensillum (ss) variously shaped................................ 2
+
+
+
+
+
+2. Notogaster pyriform, almost round, with only seven pairs of setae and strongly contrasting microsculpture between the centrodorsal region and the circumgastric scissure, tridactylous, genitoanal chaetotaxy 4-1-1-2..............................................................
+
+Scapheremaeus colloffi
+
+Palacios-Vargas
+et al
+. 2022
+
+
+(
+Veracruz
+: Los Tuxtlas).
+
+
+
+- Notogaster usually elongate with eight or more pairs of setae, genitoanal chaetotaxy distinct......................... 3
+
+
+
+
+
+3. Eight pairs of notogastral setae, genitoanal chaetotaxy 6-1-2-3; humeral process very long, pointed and strongly curved............................
+
+Scapheremaeus palaciosi
+Ríos, 1996
+
+(CDMX: Contreras; Edo. de Mex.: Popocatépetl volcano).
+
+
+
+- Notogaster with nine or more pairs of setae................................................................ 4
+
+
+
+
+
+4. Notogaster with nine pairs of setae, genitoanal chaetotaxy 6-1-2-2, round lenticule....................................................................
+
+Scapheremaeus dirzoius
+Palacios-Vargas and Páez, 2018
+
+(
+Veracruz
+: Los Tuxtlas).
+
+
+
+- Notogaster with ten to 13 pairs of setae, distinct genito-anal chaetotaxy.......................................... 5
+
+
+
+
+
+5. Notogaster irregular with 14 pairs of setae, bidactylous, humeral process pointed........................................
+
+Scapheremaeus baloghius
+Ríos and Palacios-Vargas, 1998
+
+(
+Jalisco
+: Chamela;
+Chiapas
+: Chajul;
+Veracruz
+: Los Tuxtlas).
+
+
+
+- Notogaster with ten pairs of setae........................................................................ 6
+
+
+
+
+
+6. Epimeral chaetotaxy 3-1-3-3, bidactylous, triangular humeral process present; three pairs of setae in the centrodorsal region........................................
+
+Scapheremaeus schatzi
+Ríos and Palacios-Vargas, 1998
+
+(
+Jalisco
+, Chamela).
+
+
+
+- Epimeral chaetotaxy 3-1-2-2............................................................................ 7
+
+
+
+
+
+7. Notogaster with a well-developed diagonal extensions of centrodorsal region; setae of the centrodorsal region spiniform,
+c2
+,
+la
+,
+hi-3
+and
+p1-p3
+bacilliform shape; sensillum (Bothridial seta) with a striate capitulum........................................................................................
+
+
+Scapheremaeus subiasi
+
+sp. nov.
+
+(El Zapote,
+Morelos
+).
+
+
+
+- Notogaster without diagonal extensions; total body length less than two times its width............................. 8
+
+
+
+
+8. Centrodorsal region of notogaster with a longitudinal ridge.................................................... 9
+
+
+- Centrodorsal region of notogaster without a longitudinal ridge................................................ 11
+
+
+
+
+9. Notogaster setae rod-shape with normal alveoli............................................................ 10
+
+
+
+- Notogaster setae flame-shaped with relatively large alveoli, lichen-shaped sensillum (Bothridial seta), three longitudinal carinae....
+
+Scapheremaeus flamiferus
+Palacios-Vargas and
+Ríos, 1998
+
+(
+Nicaragua
+:
+León
+; Mex:
+Q. Roo
+, Guerrero, Veracruz).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+10. Sensillum (Bothridial seta) black, barbed and elongated, an incomplete crest between the lenticule and the centrodorsal plate..................
+
+Scapheremaeus grahamius
+Ríos and Palacios-Vargas, 1998
+
+(CDMX: Reserva Pedregal de San Ángel).
+
+
+
+
+- Sensillum (Bothridial seta) moruliform and elliptical. A lateral and posterior crest to the lenticule that borders the central area present. Posterior margin of the notogaster truncated and a well-developed concavity...........................................................
+
+Scapheremaeus tillandsiophilus
+Ríos and Palacios-Vargas, 1998
+
+(
+Morelos
+: Chichinautzin).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+11. Centrodorsal region of notogaster with two lateral ridges joining the
+lm
+and
+lp
+setae; anterior region of notogaster semi rectangular. Rostral setae minute (3 μm)..................................................................................................
+
+Scapheremaeus eugenius
+Ríos y Palacios-Vargas, 1998
+
+(
+Jalisco
+: Sierra de Manantlán).
+
+
+
+- No lateral ridges and average rostral setae about 10 μm or more............................................... 12
+
+
+
+
+12. Notogaster with ridges between lenticule and central zone................................................... 16
+
+
+- Notogaster without ridges between the lenticule and the central zone........................................... 13
+
+
+
+
+
+13. Centrodorsal region of the notogaster almost circular. Prodorsum with very long lamellae, inhabitant rock surfaces........................................................
+
+Scapheremaeus chaac
+Ríos and Palacios-Vargas, 1998
+
+(
+Yucatán
+).
+
+
+
+- Centrodorsal region of notogaster elliptic. Prodorsum without lamellae.......................................... 14
+
+
+
+
+
+14. All setae of notogaster and
+ad1
+and
+ad2
+fungiform, humeral processes spiniform......................................................................
+
+Scapheremaeus fungisetosus
+Ríos and Palacios-Vargas, 1998
+
+(
+Jalisco
+: Chamela).
+
+
+
+- Centrodorsal region of the notogaster with or without longitudinal crest, setae no fungiform......................... 15
+
+
+
+
+
+15. Humeral processes absent. Lamellar setae setiform, lichen-shaped sensillum (Bothridial seta), with a small notch near seta
+c2
+..................................
+
+Scapheremaeus mahunkaius
+Ríos and Palacios-Vargas, 1998
+
+(
+Jalisco
+, Chamela).
+
+
+
+
+- Humeral process present. Lamellar setae bacilliform, sensillum (bothridial seta) head black; no notch near setae
+c2
+..........................................
+
+Scapheremaeus simplex
+Ríos and Palacios-Vargas, 1998
+
+(
+Morelos
+: Chichinautzin).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+16. Body very flattened (body length/thickness = 3.4). Lamellar and notogastral setae minute (4μm)...........................................................
+
+Scapheremaeus nogueraius
+Ríos and Palacios-Vargas, 1998
+
+(
+Jalisco
+: Chamela).
+
+
+
+- Body normal, not flattened (length/thickness = 1.6–2.3). Lamellar setae medium to long........................... 17
+
+
+
+
+
+17. Sensillum (Bothridial seta) lichen-shaped. Notogaster broad (length/width ratio = 1.5), capitulum sensilla hyaline................................
+
+Scapheremaeus volcanicus
+Ríos and Palacios-Vargas, 1998
+
+(Edo. de Mex.: volcán Popocatépetl)
+
+
+
+- Sensillum (Bothridial seta) has a different shape. Notogaster not as wide........................................ 18
+
+
+
+
+
+18 Sensilum (Bothridial seta) with a morula-like appearance, body relatively elongated (length/width = 1.8). Humeral process absent.........................
+
+Scapheremaeus morulisensillatus
+Ríos and Palacios-Vargas, 1998
+
+(CDMX: Contreras)
+
+
+
+- Sensilla not morula-shaped............................................................................. 19
+
+
+
+
+
+19 Notogastral setae rod-shaped, long (15 μm).Posterior margin of notogaster with irregular edges. Posterior margin of circumdorsal region strongly projected and triangular........................................................
+
+Scapheremaeus magdalenae
+Ríos and Palacios-Vargas, 1998
+
+(
+Baja California
+:
+Cedros Island
+,
+Baja California Sur
+:
+Sierra La Laguna
+).
+
+
+
+- Body setae not rod-shaped, distinct, shorter. Posterior margin of notogaster rounded............................... 20
+
+
+
+
+
+20 Prodorsum with short lamellar cusps, translamella incomplete. Cerotegument strongly developed. Notogaster with two circular central areas. Posterior notogastral setae fungiform............................................................
+
+Scapheremaeus tonatiuh
+Palacios-Vargas, Rìos and Vázquez, 1998
+
+(
+Jalisco
+:
+Chamela, Q
+. Roo: Sian Ka’an;
+Chiapas
+: Chajul).
+
+
+
+
+- Prodorsum without lamellar cusps and without translamella. Cerotegument inconspicuous. Notogaster with a single central area, with tiny setae slightly clavate and large alveolus.....................................................................................
+
+Scapheremaeus hectorperezius
+Ríos and Palacios-Vargas, 1998
+
+(
+Veracruz
+, Los Tuxtlas).
+
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF82FFC11811FCFA41748B5E.xml b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF82FFC11811FCFA41748B5E.xml
index 57545ad0144..50b87a31942 100644
--- a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF82FFC11811FCFA41748B5E.xml
+++ b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF82FFC11811FCFA41748B5E.xml
@@ -1,42 +1,42 @@
-
-
-
-A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
+
+
+
+A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Onuferko, Thomas M.
+Onuferko, Thomas M.
-text
-
-
-European Journal of Taxonomy
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
-
-2019
-
-2019-10-07
+
+2019
+
+2019-10-07
-
-563
+
+563
-
-1
-69
+
+1
+69
-journal article
-25281
-10.5852/ejt.2019.563
-4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
-3476748
-6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
+journal article
+10.5852/ejt.2019.563
+4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
+2118-9773
+3476748
+6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
-
-
+
+
@@ -48,13 +48,15 @@
comb. nov.
+
+
Figs 7C
,
9
-
+
@@ -68,13 +70,13 @@
).
+
+
Proposed common name
-
-
Daniel’s epeolus.
@@ -117,10 +119,10 @@ material
-
+
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
•
-♀
+♀
,
Tri. danieli
@@ -129,28 +131,15 @@ material
(studied from images);
La Altagracia Province
,
-Cueva del Puente
-(
-Guaraguao
-,
-Parque Nacional Del Este
-);
+Cueva del Puente (Guaraguao, Parque Nacional Del Este)
+;
-
-
-9
-May
-
-1992
-
+9 May 1992
;
B. Hierro
leg.;
-
-MNHNSD
-18.107
-
+MNHNSD 18.107
.
diff --git a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF84FFC21835FC8B418F8BB1.xml b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF84FFC21835FC8B418F8BB1.xml
index f64307853c0..c3812a003b1 100644
--- a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF84FFC21835FC8B418F8BB1.xml
+++ b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF84FFC21835FC8B418F8BB1.xml
@@ -1,41 +1,41 @@
-
-
-
-A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
+
+
+
+A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Onuferko, Thomas M.
+Onuferko, Thomas M.
-text
-
-
-European Journal of Taxonomy
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
-
-2019
-
-2019-10-07
+
+2019
+
+2019-10-07
-
-563
+
+563
-
-1
-69
+
+1
+69
-journal article
-25281
-10.5852/ejt.2019.563
-4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
-3476748
-6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
+journal article
+10.5852/ejt.2019.563
+4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
+2118-9773
+3476748
+6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
-
+
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
10
-
+
@@ -75,13 +75,13 @@
]).
+
+
Proposed common name
-
-
Yellow-haired epeolus.
@@ -183,20 +183,16 @@ material
-
+
MEXICO
•
-♀
+♀
,
holotype
; west coast;
G.F. Mathew
leg.;
-NHMUK
-
-NHMUK
-010812213
-
+NHMUK NHMUK010812213
.
@@ -208,15 +204,14 @@ leg.;
Non-barcoded material
-
+
EL SALVADOR
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
;
La Libertad
,
-Mount
-San Salvador
+Mount San Salvador
;
8 Jul. 1963
@@ -226,24 +221,22 @@ leg.;
and
D.Q. Cavagnaro
leg.;
-
-EMEC
-1135878
-
+EMEC 1135878
.
-
+
MEXICO
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
;
Chiapas
,
+
20–25 mi
-N of
-Huixtla
+N of Huixtla
+
;
4 Jun. 1969
@@ -251,10 +244,7 @@ N of
;
H.J. Teskey
leg.;
-
-CNC
-754058
-
+CNC 754058
.
diff --git a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF87FFCE1868FBD741828C98.xml b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF87FFCE1868FBD741828C98.xml
index 6560b6c1774..803ef26e1b1 100644
--- a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF87FFCE1868FBD741828C98.xml
+++ b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF87FFCE1868FBD741828C98.xml
@@ -1,41 +1,41 @@
-
-
-
-A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
+
+
+
+A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Onuferko, Thomas M.
+Onuferko, Thomas M.
-text
-
-
-European Journal of Taxonomy
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
-
-2019
-
-2019-10-07
+
+2019
+
+2019-10-07
-
-563
+
+563
-
-1
-69
+
+1
+69
-journal article
-25281
-10.5852/ejt.2019.563
-4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
-3476748
-6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
+journal article
+10.5852/ejt.2019.563
+4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
+2118-9773
+3476748
+6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
-
+
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
A
-
+
@@ -74,13 +74,13 @@ A
(sex not stated).
+
+
Proposed common name
-
-
Dusky-winged epeolus.
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ material
Available. BOLD:ACZ0714. Specimens examined and sequenced:
-
+
PANAMA
•
1 ♂
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ Available. BOLD:ACZ0714. Specimens examined and sequenced:
,
8 km
S of
-Boquete
+Boquete
;
8.6986° N
,
@@ -200,12 +200,11 @@ S of
and
T.D. McIntyre
leg.; BOLD sample ID: CCDB-28239 H01;
-BBSL
-FDP119767
+BBSL FDP119767
•
-
-1 ♀
+
+1 ♀
; same collection data as for preceding;
21–31 Jan. 2012
@@ -214,12 +213,9 @@ leg.; BOLD sample ID: CCDB-28239 H01;
F.D. Parker
and
T.D. McIntyre
-leg.; BOLD sample ID: CCDB- 28239 G12;
-BBSL
-FDP
-
-120261
-
+leg.; BOLD sample ID: CCDB-28239 G12;
+BBSL
+FDP120261
.
@@ -245,15 +241,15 @@ FDP
Non-barcoded material
-
+
COSTA RICA
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
;
San José
,
-Pérez Zeledón
-(San Isidro vicinity);
+Pérez Zeledón (San Isidro vicinity)
+;
1 Feb.–12 Apr. 2001
@@ -269,22 +265,21 @@ leg.;
MEXICO
•
-2 ♀♀
+2 ♀♀
,
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
;
-ANSP
+ANSP
•
-
-1 ♀
+
+1 ♀
;
Chiapas
,
Ei. La Palma
-(
-Acacoyagua
-);
+(Acacoyagua)
+;
15.5665° N
,
92.7902° W
@@ -304,11 +299,11 @@ and
C. Balboa
leg.;
ECOSUR
-ECO- TAE-42220
+ECO-TAE-42220
•
-
-1 ♂
+
+1 ♂
;
Chiapas
,
@@ -335,11 +330,11 @@ and
J. Toto
leg.;
ECOSUR
-ECO-TAE-50698
+ECO-TAE-50698
•
-
-1 ♀
+
+1 ♀
; same collection data as for preceding;
29 Nov. 2006
@@ -356,11 +351,11 @@ and
J. Toto
leg.;
ECOSUR
-ECO-TAE-51519
+ECO-TAE-51519
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
;
Sinaloa
,
@@ -375,11 +370,11 @@ E of Chupaderos
;
F.D. Parker
leg.;
-BBSL
+BBSL
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
;
Yucatán
,
@@ -398,7 +393,7 @@ leg.;
.
-
+
PANAMA
•
1 ♀
@@ -407,7 +402,7 @@ leg.;
,
8 km
S of
-Boquete
+Boquete
;
8.6986° N
,
diff --git a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF8BFFCB1876FAC941048CE2.xml b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF8BFFCB1876FAC941048CE2.xml
index 1b8848a6449..1b350184fe5 100644
--- a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF8BFFCB1876FAC941048CE2.xml
+++ b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF8BFFCB1876FAC941048CE2.xml
@@ -1,42 +1,42 @@
-
-
-
-A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
+
+
+
+A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Onuferko, Thomas M.
+Onuferko, Thomas M.
-text
-
-
-European Journal of Taxonomy
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
-
-2019
-
-2019-10-07
+
+2019
+
+2019-10-07
-
-563
+
+563
-
-1
-69
+
+1
+69
-journal article
-25281
-10.5852/ejt.2019.563
-4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
-3476748
-6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
+journal article
+10.5852/ejt.2019.563
+4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
+2118-9773
+3476748
+6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
-
-
+
+
@@ -45,14 +45,14 @@
sp. nov.
+
+
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:
D3322A0B-3133-4BA9-A752-F5009E03B1ED
-
-
Figs 1E
,
@@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:
,
13
+
+
Proposed common name
@@ -145,16 +147,16 @@ material
-
+
MEXICO
•
-♀
+♀
,
holotype
;
Jalisco
,
-El Tigre
+El Tigre
;
18 Jul. 1954
@@ -162,10 +164,7 @@ material
;
J.W. MacSwain
leg.;
-
-EMEC
-1135889
-
+EMEC 1135889
.
@@ -180,7 +179,7 @@ material
MEXICO
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
,
paratype
;
@@ -201,8 +200,8 @@ leg.;
UCBME
•
-
-1 ♂
+
+1 ♂
,
paratype
;
@@ -213,16 +212,14 @@ leg.;
7 Jul. 1947
-;
-D. Rockefeller Exp.
-,
+; D. Rockefeller Exp.,
Michener
leg.;
-AMNH
+AMNH
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
,
paratype
;
@@ -241,14 +238,11 @@ E of El Salto
;
L.A. Kelton
leg.;
-
-CNC
-754077
-
+CNC 754077
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
,
paratype
; same collection data as for preceding;
@@ -258,21 +252,15 @@ leg.;
;
L.A. Kelton
leg.;
-
-CNC
-754086
-
+CNC 754086
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
,
allotype
; same collection data as for holotype;
-
-EMEC
-1135885
-
+EMEC 1135885
.
diff --git a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF8EFFF7185DFB67402E8B7C.xml b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF8EFFF7185DFB67402E8B7C.xml
index 8c61c8e1e25..5bed326f1f0 100644
--- a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF8EFFF7185DFB67402E8B7C.xml
+++ b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF8EFFF7185DFB67402E8B7C.xml
@@ -1,41 +1,41 @@
-
-
-
-A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
+
+
+
+A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Onuferko, Thomas M.
+Onuferko, Thomas M.
-text
-
-
-European Journal of Taxonomy
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
-
-2019
-
-2019-10-07
+
+2019
+
+2019-10-07
-
-563
+
+563
-
-1
-69
+
+1
+69
-journal article
-25281
-10.5852/ejt.2019.563
-4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
-3476748
-6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
+journal article
+10.5852/ejt.2019.563
+4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
+2118-9773
+3476748
+6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
-
+
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
A
-
+
@@ -109,13 +109,13 @@ designation.
syn. nov.
+
+
Proposed common name
-
-
Yellow-winged epeolus.
@@ -218,10 +218,10 @@ material
-
+
COSTA RICA
•
-♂
+♂
,
E. luteipennis
@@ -230,29 +230,27 @@ material
;
San José
,
-San José
+San José
; 1903;
Schmidt
leg.;
-ZMB
+ZMB
.
-
+
ECUADOR
•
-♂
+♂
,
E. xanthurus
-holotype
-; “Collection CF Baker”;
-
-USNM
-534608
-
+holotype; “Collection
+CF Baker
+”;
+USNM 534608
.
@@ -260,25 +258,19 @@ leg.;
HONDURAS
•
-♀
+♀
,
E. rugosus
-holotype
-;
+holotype;
Francisco Morazán
, Zamorano;
-
-14 Jul.
-
+14 Jul.
????;
Vidales
leg.;
-
-USNM
-534050
-
+USNM 534050
.
@@ -293,7 +285,7 @@ material
COSTA RICA
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
,
E. luteipennis
@@ -304,10 +296,7 @@ material
,
San Mateo
;
-
-AMNH
-25582
-
+AMNH 25582
.
@@ -319,10 +308,10 @@ material
Non-barcoded material
-
+
COSTA RICA
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
;
Cartago
,
@@ -334,13 +323,11 @@ material
;
F. Schrader
leg.;
-KUNHM
-SEMC
-1248314
+KUNHM SEMC1248314
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
; same collection data as for preceding;
21 Jun. 1948
@@ -352,13 +339,13 @@ leg.;
SEMC1248315
•
-
-1 ♂
+
+1 ♂
;
San José
,
-Pérez Zeledón
-(San Isidro vicinity);
+Pérez Zeledón (San Isidro vicinity)
+;
1 Feb.–12 Apr. 2001
@@ -374,13 +361,13 @@ leg.;
MEXICO
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
;
-ANSP
+ANSP
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
;
Chiapas
,
@@ -392,14 +379,11 @@ leg.;
;
L.A. Kelton
leg.;
-
-CNC
-754065
-
+CNC 754065
•
-
-1 ♂
+
+1 ♂
;
Chiapas
,
@@ -426,11 +410,11 @@ and
J. Toto
leg.;
ECOSUR
-ECO-TAE-49935
+ECO-TAE-49935
•
-
-1 ♀
+
+1 ♀
;
Chiapas
,
@@ -457,11 +441,11 @@ and
J. Mérida
leg.;
ECOSUR
-ECO-TA-E-41388
+ECO-TA-E-41388
•
-
-2 ♂♂
+
+2 ♂♂
; same collection data as for preceding;
24 Oct. 2006
@@ -478,11 +462,13 @@ and
J. Toto
leg.;
ECOSUR
-ECO-TAE-49452, ECO-TAE-49453
+ECO-TAE-49452
+,
+ECO-TAE-49453
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
;
Chiapas
,
@@ -494,14 +480,11 @@ ECO-TAE-49452, ECO-TAE-49453
;
L.A. Kelton
leg.;
-
-CNC
-754066
-
+CNC 754066
•
-2 ♀♀
+2 ♀♀
;
Jalisco
,
@@ -509,15 +492,15 @@ leg.;
; “8.10.??”;
McClendon
leg.;
-ANSP
+ANSP
•
-
-1 ♂
+
+1 ♂
;
Michoacán
,
-Morelia
+Morelia
;
25 Jun. 1957
@@ -527,14 +510,11 @@ leg.;
and
B.J. Rannells
leg.;
-
-EMEC
-1135854
-
+EMEC 1135854
•
-2 ♀♀
+2 ♀♀
;
Morelos
,
@@ -555,12 +535,12 @@ leg.;
SEMC1247914
•
-
-1 ♂
+
+1 ♂
;
Veracruz
,
-
+
10 km
N of Coscomatepec
@@ -575,18 +555,15 @@ N of Coscomatepec
, and
J. Powell
leg.;
-
-EMEC
-1135855
-
+EMEC 1135855
•
-
-3 ♂♂
+
+3 ♂♂
;
Veracruz
,
-
+
7.1 km
E of Huatusco
@@ -605,14 +582,14 @@ leg.;
SM0735388
•
-
-1 ♂
+
+1 ♂
;
Veracruz
,
S of Ixhuatlán
-(SE
-Huatusco
+(
+SE Huatusco
);
17–18 Jul. 1990
@@ -629,7 +606,7 @@ leg.; BOLD sample ID: CCDB-28315 D04;
PANAMA
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
;
Panama
Canal Zone Summit
@@ -640,20 +617,17 @@ leg.; BOLD sample ID: CCDB-28315 D04;
;
N.L.H. Kraus
leg.;
-
-EMEC
-1135853
-
+EMEC 1135853
•
-
-1 ♂
+
+1 ♂
;
Chiriquí
,
8 km
S of
-Boquete
+Boquete
;
8.6986° N
,
@@ -667,23 +641,20 @@ S of
and
T.D. McIntyre
leg.;
-BBSL
+BBSL
FDP118503
.
-
+
VENEZUELA
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
;
Mérida
,
-
-Valle
-de Culata
-
+Valle de Culata
;
23 Jul. 1988
@@ -693,7 +664,7 @@ Valle
and
L. Stange
leg.;
-FSCA
+FSCA
.
diff --git a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF95FFDB1852FB2D40808D2B.xml b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF95FFDB1852FB2D40808D2B.xml
index 7acee0f8ff6..4484462088a 100644
--- a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF95FFDB1852FB2D40808D2B.xml
+++ b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF95FFDB1852FB2D40808D2B.xml
@@ -1,41 +1,41 @@
-
-
-
-A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
+
+
+
+A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Onuferko, Thomas M.
+Onuferko, Thomas M.
-text
-
-
-European Journal of Taxonomy
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
-
-2019
-
-2019-10-07
+
+2019
+
+2019-10-07
-
-563
+
+563
-
-1
-69
+
+1
+69
-journal article
-25281
-10.5852/ejt.2019.563
-4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
-3476748
-6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
+journal article
+10.5852/ejt.2019.563
+4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
+2118-9773
+3476748
+6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
-
+
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
7A
-
+
@@ -85,13 +85,13 @@
syn. nov.
+
+
Proposed common name
-
-
Bolivian epeolus.
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ apart from all other
Fig. 6D
); the fore wings are deeply infuscate apically (
Fig. 6
-A– B); T1 has only a bright to pale yellow subapical fascia, which is usually narrower than the T2 apical fascia (
+A–B); T1 has only a bright to pale yellow subapical fascia, which is usually narrower than the T2 apical fascia (
Fig. 6B
); and the remaining terga lack fasciae, although the apical impressed areas occasionally have sparse, off-white hairs (
Fig. 6
@@ -171,46 +171,22 @@ Primary
material
-
-
+
+
BOLIVIA
•
-♂
+♂
,
E. boliviensis
holotype
;
-La Paz Department
+La Paz Department
,
-Mapiri
+Mapiri
; 1900;
-ZMB
-
-.
-
-COSTA RICA
-•
-♀
-,
-
-Tro. schraderi
-
-holotype
-;
-Limón
-?,
-Los Diamantes
-;
-
-26 May 1948
-
-;
-F. Schrader
-leg.;
-KUNHM
-SEMC1461052
+ZMB
.
@@ -292,6 +268,31 @@ spp.
, in which the penis lacks lobes. Scale bars = 0.5 mm.
+
+
+COSTA RICA
+•
+♀
+,
+
+Tro. schraderi
+
+holotype;
+Limón
+?,
+Los Diamantes
+;
+
+26 May 1948
+
+;
+F. Schrader
+leg.;
+KUNHM
+SEMC1461052
+
+.
+
DNA barcoded material with BIN-compliant sequences
@@ -300,16 +301,17 @@ spp.
Non-barcoded material
-
+
ARGENTINA
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
;
Tucumán Province
,
+
12 km
-N of
-El Cadillal
+N of El Cadillal
+
;
21 Nov. 1989
@@ -318,61 +320,50 @@ N of
J.G. Rozen
and
A. Roig
-leg.;
-AMNH AMNH
-_
-IZC 00290827
+leg.; AMNH
+AMNH_IZC 00290827
.
-
+
BOLIVIA
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
;
Chuquisaca Department
-, E of
-Muyupampa
+,
+E of Muyupampa
;
20 Dec. 1984
;
L.E. Peña
-leg.;
-AMNH AMNH
-_
-IZC 00290828
+leg.; AMNH
+AMNH_IZC 00290828
.
-
+
BRAZIL
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
;
Rio de Janeiro
,
-Rio de Janeiro
-(formerly
-State of Guanabara
-),
-
-Represa
-Rio Grande
-
+Rio de Janeiro
+(formerly State of Guanabara),
+Represa Rio Grande
;
Jan. 1972
;
M. Alvarenga
-leg.;
-AMNH AMNH
-_
-IZC 00290831
+leg.; AMNH
+AMNH_IZC 00290831
.
@@ -380,7 +371,7 @@ _
COSTA RICA
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
;
Alajuela
,
@@ -395,16 +386,14 @@ leg.;
RAM
•
-
-1 ♀
+
+1 ♀
;
Cartago
,
Turrialba
-(grounds of the
-Inter-American Institute
-for
-Cooperation on Agriculture
+(
+grounds of the Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture
);
3–5 Jun. 1976
@@ -412,50 +401,42 @@ for
;
M. Wasbauer
leg.;
-
-EMEC
-1135891
-
+EMEC 1135891
•
-
-1 ♀
+
+1 ♀
;
Heredia
,
-
-La Selva
-
-(
-
+
+La Selva (
4 km
-SE of Puerto Viejo
-
-);
+SE of Puerto Viejo)
+
+;
8 May 1980
;
R. Coville
leg.;
-
-EMEC
-1135892
-
+EMEC 1135892
.
-
+
ECUADOR
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
;
El Oro
,
+
10 km
-NE of
-Piñas
+NE of Piñas
+
;
7 Jul. 1989
@@ -465,12 +446,12 @@ NE of
and
R. Miller
leg.;
-FSCA
+FSCA
.
-
+
PANAMA
•
1 ♂
@@ -491,63 +472,55 @@ leg.;
and
R. Brooks
leg.;
-KUNHM
-SM0039429
+KUNHM SM0039429
.
-
+
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
;
Tunapuna-Piarco
,
-Simla Research Station
-(
+
+Simla Research Station (
8 km
-N of
-Arima
-);
+N of Arima)
+
+;
24 Jun.–8. Jul. 1993
;
S. and J. Peck
leg.;
-
-CNC
-754052
-
+CNC 754052
.
-
+
VENEZUELA
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
;
Aragua
,
Cuyagua
;
-
-14 May
-
-??94;
-AMNH AMNH
-_
-IZC 00290829
+14 May
+??94; AMNH
+AMNH_IZC 00290829
•
-
-1 ♂
+
+1 ♂
;
Aragua
,
-El Limon
+El Limon
;
26 Mar. 1987
@@ -557,18 +530,16 @@ _
and
L. Stange
leg.;
-FSCA
+FSCA
•
-
-1 ♀
+
+1 ♀
;
Aragua
,
-Estación Biológica de Rancho Grande
-(
-Portachuelo Pass
-);
+Estación Biológica de Rancho Grande (Portachuelo Pass)
+;
10.3500° N
,
67.6833° W
@@ -583,19 +554,17 @@ leg.;
and
R. Hanley
leg.; BOLD sample ID: CCDB-28315 D02;
-KUNHM
-SM0124173
+KUNHM SM0124173
•
-
-1 ♀
+
+1 ♀
; same collection data as for preceding;
-KUNHM
-SM0124174
+KUNHM SM0124174
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
;
Carabobo
,
@@ -607,31 +576,25 @@ leg.; BOLD sample ID: CCDB-28315 D02;
;
L. Masner
leg.;
-
-CNC
-754053
-
+CNC 754053
•
-
-2 ♀♀
+
+2 ♀♀
;
Táchira
,
Pregonero
(
-Campamento Siberia
-hospital);
+Campamento Siberia hospital
+);
10–31 Jul. 1989
;
S. and J. Peck
leg.;
-
-CNC
-754054
-
+CNC 754054
,
754055
diff --git a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF9EFFC7185EFABD472E8A93.xml b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF9EFFC7185EFABD472E8A93.xml
index c93ee09a879..9de76afd1e9 100644
--- a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF9EFFC7185EFABD472E8A93.xml
+++ b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFF9EFFC7185EFABD472E8A93.xml
@@ -1,41 +1,41 @@
-
-
-
-A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
+
+
+
+A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Onuferko, Thomas M.
+Onuferko, Thomas M.
-text
-
-
-European Journal of Taxonomy
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
-
-2019
-
-2019-10-07
+
+2019
+
+2019-10-07
-
-563
+
+563
-
-1
-69
+
+1
+69
-journal article
-25281
-10.5852/ejt.2019.563
-4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
-3476748
-6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
+journal article
+10.5852/ejt.2019.563
+4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
+2118-9773
+3476748
+6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
-
+
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
8
-
+
@@ -85,13 +85,13 @@
syn. nov.
+
+
Proposed common name
-
-
Clear-winged epeolus.
@@ -157,10 +157,10 @@ material
-
+
BOLIVIA
•
-♀
+♀
,
E. claripennis
@@ -169,42 +169,33 @@ material
;
Cochabamba Department
,
-Tarata
-;
-1900
-;
-ZMB
+Tarata
+; 1900;
+ZMB
.
-
+
PANAMA
•
-♀
+♀
,
Tro. odontothorax
-holotype
-;
+holotype;
Chiriquí
,
-El Volcán
-Chiriquí
+El Volcán Chiriquí
;
-
-27 Feb.
-1936
-
+27 Feb. 1936
;
F.E. Lutz
-leg.;
-AMNH AMNH
-_
-IZC 00324262
+leg.; AMNH
+AMNH_IZC 00324262
.
@@ -216,35 +207,26 @@ material
-
+
PANAMA
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
,
Tro. odontothorax
-allotype
-;
+allotype;
Coclé
,
El Valle de Antón
;
-
-
-1
-Apr.
-
-1945
-
+1 Apr. 1945
;
C.D. Michener
-leg.;
-AMNH AMNH
-_
-IZC 00324263
+leg.; AMNH
+AMNH_IZC 00324263
.
@@ -288,39 +270,31 @@ leg.; BOLD sample ID: CCDB-28315 F06;
Non-barcoded material
-
+
COSTA RICA
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
;
Puntarenas
,
-F. Las Cruces
-(
-
+
+F. Las Cruces (
6 km
-S of San Vito
+S of San Vito)
-); 21 or
+; 21 or
-
-
-25
-Aug.
-
-1976
-
+25 Aug. 1976
;
E.M. Fisher
leg.;
-LACM LACM
-ENT
-363332
+LACM
+LACM ENT 363332
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
;
San José
,
@@ -331,13 +305,7 @@ leg.;
83.6039° W
;
-
-
-7
-May
-
-2005
-
+7 May 2005
;
H.T. Ngo
@@ -346,13 +314,10 @@ leg.;
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
; same collection data as for preceding;
-
-13 May
-2005
-
+13 May 2005
;
H.T. Ngo
@@ -361,13 +326,10 @@ leg.;
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
; same collection data as for preceding;
-
-13 Jul.
-2005
-
+13 Jul. 2005
;
H.T. Ngo
@@ -376,13 +338,10 @@ leg.;
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
; same collection data as for preceding;
-
-2 Sep.
-2005
-
+2 Sep. 2005
;
H.T. Ngo
@@ -391,13 +350,10 @@ leg.;
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
; same collection data as for preceding;
-
-9 Jan.
-2006
-
+9 Jan. 2006
;
H.T. Ngo
@@ -405,20 +361,15 @@ leg.;
PCYU
•
-
-1 ♀
+
+1 ♀
;
San José
,
-Quizarra
-(
-Sr. Rojas’
-farm);
+Quizarra (Sr. Rojas’ farm)
+;
-
-12 May
-2005
-
+12 May 2005
;
H.T. Ngo
@@ -427,74 +378,61 @@ leg.;
•
-2 ♀♀
+2 ♀♀
;
San José
,
San Isidro de El General
;
-
-Feb.
-1993
-
+Feb. 1993
;
F.D. Parker
leg.;
-BBSL
+BBSL
.
-
+
PANAMA
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
;
-
-Panamá
-
+Panamá
,
+
15 km
-N of
-El Llano
-(Camino Cartí);
+N of El Llano (Camino Cartí)
+
+;
-
-10 May
-1981
-
+10 May 1981
;
R.W. Brooks
leg.;
-KUNHM
-SM
-0738700
+KUNHM SM0738700
•
-
-1 ♀
+
+1 ♀
; same collection data as for preceding;
-KUNHM
-SM
-0738701
+KUNHM SM0738701
.
-
+
VENEZUELA
•
1 ♀
;
Aragua
,
-Estación Biológica de Rancho Grande
-(
-Portachuelo Pass
-);
+Estación Biológica de Rancho Grande (Portachuelo Pass)
+;
10.3500° N
,
67.6833° W
@@ -508,19 +446,14 @@ leg.;
;
R. Brooks
leg.;
-KUNHM
-SEMC
-1248355
+KUNHM SEMC1248355
•
-
-3 ♂♂
+
+3 ♂♂
; same collection data as for preceding;
-
-4 Jun.
-1998
-
+4 Jun. 1998
;
J. Ashe
@@ -529,22 +462,18 @@ leg.;
and
R. Hanley
leg.;
-KUNHM
-SM
-0124175,
+KUNHM SM0124175
+,
SM0124178
,
SM0124179
•
-
-2 ♀♀
+
+2 ♀♀
; same collection data as for preceding;
-
-4 Jun.
-1998
-
+4 Jun. 1998
;
J. Ashe
@@ -553,30 +482,24 @@ leg.;
and
R. Hanley
leg.;
-KUNHM
-SM
-0124176,
+KUNHM SM0124176
+,
SM0124177
•
-
-1 ♂
+
+1 ♂
;
Carabobo
,
-Henri Pittier National Park
-(
-Portachuelo Pass
-);
+Henri Pittier National Park (Portachuelo Pass)
+;
10.3475° N
,
67.6878° W
;
-
-15 Sep.
-2008
-
+15 Sep. 2008
;
J. Skevington
@@ -584,27 +507,23 @@ leg.;
PCYU
•
-
-1 ♂
+
+1 ♂
;
Lara
,
-Parque Nacional Yacambú
-(
-
+
+Parque Nacional Yacambú (
16.1 km
-SE of Sanare
-
-);
+SE of Sanare)
+
+;
9.7000° N
,
69.5850° W
;
-
-2 Jun.
-1998
-
+2 Jun. 1998
;
J. Ashe
@@ -613,9 +532,7 @@ SE of Sanare
and
R. Hanley
leg.;
-KUNHM
-SM
-0122036
+KUNHM SM0122036
.
diff --git a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFA0FFE61844FE0447608996.xml b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFA0FFE61844FE0447608996.xml
index 2508fc263f8..f5ee4f04650 100644
--- a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFA0FFE61844FE0447608996.xml
+++ b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFA0FFE61844FE0447608996.xml
@@ -1,41 +1,41 @@
-
-
-
-A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
+
+
+
+A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Onuferko, Thomas M.
+Onuferko, Thomas M.
-text
-
-
-European Journal of Taxonomy
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
-
-2019
-
-2019-10-07
+
+2019
+
+2019-10-07
-
-563
+
+563
-
-1
-69
+
+1
+69
-journal article
-25281
-10.5852/ejt.2019.563
-4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
-3476748
-6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
+journal article
+10.5852/ejt.2019.563
+4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
+2118-9773
+3476748
+6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
-
+
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ Figs
19
-
+
@@ -74,13 +74,13 @@ Figs
).
+
+
Proposed common name
-
-
Cuban epeolus.
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ material
CUBA
•
-♂
+♂
,
holotype
(studied from images);
@@ -151,64 +151,53 @@ leg.;
Non-barcoded material
-
+
CUBA
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
;
Guantánamo
,
Limonar
-(near
-Centro Cient.
+(
+near Centro Cient.
);
-
-9 Apr.
-
+9 Apr.
??95; E.P.F. leg.;
-FSCA
+FSCA
•
-
-1 ♂
+
+1 ♂
;
Guantánamo
-, mountains near
-Guantánamo
+,
+mountains near Guantánamo
;
-BBSL
+BBSL
•
-
-1 ♂
+
+1 ♂
;
Pinar Del Río
,
-El Mulo
-(
-Sierra del Rosario
-);
-Jun.
-??87;
+El Mulo (Sierra del Rosario)
+; Jun. ??87;
KUNHM
SEMC1248271
•
-
-1 ♀
+
+1 ♀
;
Sancti Spíritus
,
-El Hondan
--
-Topes de Collantes
-;
-Jul.
-??93;
+El Hondan - Topes de Collantes
+; Jul. ??93;
L. Roque
-leg.;
-LACM LACM
-ENT 363336
+leg.; LACM
+LACM ENT 363336
.
diff --git a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFA3FFE61AE1FBE642A98CF9.xml b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFA3FFE61AE1FBE642A98CF9.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..99b0910e9f4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFA3FFE61AE1FBE642A98CF9.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+
+
+
+A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Onuferko, Thomas M.
+
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
+
+
+2019
+
+2019-10-07
+
+
+563
+
+
+1
+69
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.5852/ejt.2019.563
+4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
+2118-9773
+3476748
+6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Epeolus scutellaris
+Say, 1824
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+MEXICO
+•
+1 ♂
+;
+Chihuahua
+,
+
+29 mi
+N of La Bufa (La Bufa-Creel Rd)
+
+;
+
+28 Aug. 1950
+
+;
+R.F. Smith
+leg.;
+KUNHM
+SEMC1248344
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFA3FFE61AE1FC79429E8C60.xml b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFA3FFE61AE1FC79429E8C60.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..8c6fb631e97
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFA3FFE61AE1FC79429E8C60.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+
+
+
+A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Onuferko, Thomas M.
+
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
+
+
+2019
+
+2019-10-07
+
+
+563
+
+
+1
+69
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.5852/ejt.2019.563
+4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
+2118-9773
+3476748
+6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Epeolus pusillus
+Cresson, 1864
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+BELIZE
+•
+1 ♂
+;
+Belize
+,
+Tropical Education Center
+;
+
+1 Mar. 2007
+
+;
+J.G. Rozen
+and
+J.S. Ascher
+leg.;
+AMNH AMNH
+_
+IZC 00290832
+.
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFA3FFE61AE1FC9447818BE9.xml b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFA3FFE61AE1FC9447818BE9.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7b19780391b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFA3FFE61AE1FC9447818BE9.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+
+
+
+A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Onuferko, Thomas M.
+
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
+
+
+2019
+
+2019-10-07
+
+
+563
+
+
+1
+69
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.5852/ejt.2019.563
+4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
+2118-9773
+3476748
+6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Epeolus ferrarii
+Onuferko, 2018
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+GUATEMALA
+•
+1 ♂
+;
+Zacapa
+,
+San Lorenzo
+;
+
+Nov. 1986
+
+;
+M. Sharkey
+leg.;
+
+CNC
+754068
+
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFA3FFE61AE1FD6C42118B73.xml b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFA3FFE61AE1FD6C42118B73.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..fb590eb067c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFA3FFE61AE1FD6C42118B73.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+
+
+
+A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Onuferko, Thomas M.
+
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
+
+
+2019
+
+2019-10-07
+
+
+563
+
+
+1
+69
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.5852/ejt.2019.563
+4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
+2118-9773
+3476748
+6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Epeolus brumleyi
+Onuferko, 2018
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+MEXICO
+•
+1 ♀
+;
+Chihuahua
+,
+
+5 km
+W of
+
+Ciudad Jiménez
+;
+
+21 Aug. 1991
+
+;
+T. Griswold
+leg.;
+KUNHM
+SM0307746
+.
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFA3FFE81AB6FB1246318CB2.xml b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFA3FFE81AB6FB1246318CB2.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ac3acc6e578
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFA3FFE81AB6FB1246318CB2.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,1354 @@
+
+
+
+A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Onuferko, Thomas M.
+
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
+
+
+2019
+
+2019-10-07
+
+
+563
+
+
+1
+69
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.5852/ejt.2019.563
+4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
+2118-9773
+3476748
+6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Key to species of the genus
+Epeolus
+
+in the Caribbean, Central America and
+Mexico
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+1. Axilla in dorsal view with tip extending as far back as apex of horizontal dorsal portion of mesoscutellum (
+Fig. 9C
+). Axilla and mesoscutellum entirely ferruginous (
+Fig. 9C
+). T1–T4 fasciate, apical fasciae separated into rounded lobes medially (
+Fig. 9B
+) [Hispaniola] .................................... ....................................................................................
+
+E. danieli
+(
+Genaro, 2014
+)
+
+comb. nov.
+(
+Fig. 9
+)
+
+
+
+– Mesosoma and metasoma without the combination of features listed above [other regions] .......... 2
+
+
+
+
+
+2. Pronotal collar with anterior margin relatively straight (best seen in dorsal view) (
+Fig. 2
+A–B). Mesoscutellum with distinct ridge along apex of horizontal dorsal portion overhanging depressed posterior margin (best seen in posterior view) (
+Fig. 3
+A–B), except in
+
+E. pulchellus
+
+(
+Fig. 3C
+). Penis without pair of fleshy lateral lobes (
+Fig. 1
+A–D, G–I). Frontal area commonly with pair of sparsely punctate to impunctate protrusions, each located near upper mesal margin of compound eye (
+Fig. 4A
+) ................................................................................................... 3 (‘
+Trophocleptria
+group’)
+
+
+
+
+– Pronotal collar with anterior margin convex (best seen in dorsal view) (
+Fig. 2C
+). Mesoscutellum without distinct ridge delineating dorsal and posterior portions (
+Fig. 3D
+). Penis with pair of divergent, fleshy lateral lobes (
+Fig. 1
+E–F). Frontal area never with protrusions (
+Fig. 4
+C–F) ............................. ................................................................................................................... 11 (all other
+
+Epeolus
+
+spp.)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+3. Metasomal terga with tomentum entirely black (
+Figs 8
+A–C, 15A–C). Fore wing dusky throughout or deeply infuscate basally, clear and hyaline apically (
+Figs 8
+A–B, 15B) ....................................... 4
+
+
+
+
+– At least T2 with yellow apical fascia (
+Figs 6
+A–C, 10A–C, 11A–C, 16A–C, 17A–C, 19A–C). Fore wing dusky throughout or most deeply infuscate on apical margin (
+Figs 6
+A–B, 10B, 11A–B, 16A–C, 17A–C, 19C) ................................................................................................................................ 5
+
+
+
+
+
+
+4. Mesoscutellum with pair of posteriorly directed teeth (
+Fig. 8D
+). Mesopleuron coarsely punctate, with punctures in ventrolateral half sparse (many i≥2d) (
+Fig. 5A
+) .................................................... .....................................................................................................
+
+E. claripennis
+Friese, 1908
+
+(
+Fig. 8
+)
+
+
+
+
+– Mesoscutellum without pair of posteriorly directed teeth (
+Fig. 15D
+). Mesopleuron finely punctate, with punctures in ventrolateral half dense (few i≥2d) (
+Fig. 5B
+) ........................................................ ....................................................................................................
+
+E. niger
+(
+Michener, 1954
+)
+
+(
+Fig. 15
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+5. Axilla with lateral margin crenulate, with large tooth near base. Mesoscutellum with pair of posteriorly directed teeth (
+Figs 6D
+,
+10D
+,
+16D
+) ................................................................................ 6
+
+
+
+
+– Axilla with lateral margin smooth or if crenulate, then without large tooth near base. Mesoscutellum without pair of posteriorly directed teeth (
+Figs 11D
+,
+17D
+,
+19D
+) ...................................................... 8
+
+
+
+
+
+
+6. T1 with only (bright to pale yellow) subapical fascia, which is usually narrower (its breadth sometimes equaling just a few hairs) than the (bright to pale yellow) apical fascia of T2 (
+Fig. 6B
+) .......................................................................................
+
+E. boliviensis
+Friese, 1908
+
+(
+Fig. 6
+)
+
+
+
+
+– T1 with medially narrowed or interrupted (bright to pale yellow) basal fascia, which is as broad as or broader than the (bright to pale yellow) apical fascia of T2 (
+Figs 10B
+,
+16B
+) .............................. 7
+
+
+
+
+
+
+7. T3 and T4 with complete, bright yellow fasciae (
+Fig. 10
+A–C) .......................................................... ............................................................................................
+
+E. fulvopilosus
+Cameron, 1902
+
+(
+Fig. 10
+)
+
+
+
+
+– T3 and T4 without fasciae, although apical impressed areas occasionally with sparse, off-white hairs (
+Fig. 16
+A–C) ...............................................................................
+
+E. nomadiformis
+
+sp. nov.
+(
+Fig. 16
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+8. Mesoscutum with well-defined paramedian band (
+Figs 2B
+,
+11B
+). Axilla in dorsal view with tip extending as far back as or beyond apex of horizontal dorsal portion of mesoscutellum (
+Fig. 11D
+) ......................................................................................
+
+E. fumipennis
+Say, 1837
+
+(
+Fig. 11
+)
+
+
+
+
+– Mesoscutum without paramedian band (
+Figs 17B
+,
+19B
+). Axilla in dorsal view with tip not extending as far back as apex of horizontal dorsal portion of mesoscutellum (
+Figs 17D
+,
+19D
+) ....................... 9
+
+
+
+
+
+
+9. Mesoscutum with anteromedial ovate patch of bright yellow tomentum as well as a pair of large posterolateral patches (
+Fig. 19B
+) [
+Cuba
+] ................................
+
+E. pulchellus
+Cresson, 1865
+
+(
+Fig. 19
+)
+
+
+
+
+– Mesoscutum with pale tomentum limited to pair of small patches, each between tegula and axilla, and posterior margin narrowly (
+Fig. 17B, D
+) [Central America and
+Mexico
+] ............................... 10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+10. Frontal area always with pair of pronounced granulose protrusions, each located near upper mesal margin of compound eye (
+Fig. 4A
+). Pseudopygidial area of female shorter medially, such that its apex is more than twice as wide as medial length (
+Fig. 12B
+). T3–T6 of male without fasciae; apical impressed areas occasionally with sparse, off-white hairs, but these do not form distinct bands. Pronotal collar, pronotal lobe, axilla and mesoscutellum entirely ferruginous (
+Fig. 20A
+) ...................................................
+
+E. bifasciatus
+Cresson, 1864
+
+(
+Onuferko 2018a
+: fig. 26)
+
+
+
+
+– Frontal area with pair of protrusions usually not strongly pronounced, in some cases almost lacking entirely (
+Fig. 4B
+). Pseudopygidial area of female longer medially, such that its apex is at most twice as wide as medial length (
+Fig. 12C
+). T3–T6 of male typically with well-developed bright to pale yellow fasciae (
+Fig. 17C
+). Pronotal collar, pronotal lobe, axilla and mesoscutellum entirely dark brown or black to entirely ferruginous (
+Fig. 17
+) ................................................................................ ..............................................................................
+
+E. obscuripes
+Cockerell, 1917
+
+stat. nov.
+(
+Fig. 17
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+11. Axilla in dorsal view with tip extending to or beyond ⅔ the length of mesoscutellum (
+Fig. 21
+A–C) ......................................................................................................................................................... 12
+
+
+
+
+– Axilla in dorsal view with tip extending to less than ⅔ the length of mesoscutellum (
+Figs 13D
+,
+14D
+,
+18D
+,
+21
+D–F) ................................................................................................................................... 18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+12. Axilla with free portion ~
+2
+∕
+5
+of its entire medial length or longer and usually distinctly hooked (i.e., concave, not relatively straight along medial margin) (
+Fig. 21A
+). Axilla with lateral margin convex (
+Fig. 21A
+) or relatively straight (
+Fig. 22A
+) .................................................................................... 13
+
+
+
+
+– Axilla with free portion clearly less than
+2
+∕5 of its entire medial length (
+Fig. 21
+B–C) or if borderline (0.35<
+x
+<0.4) then relatively straight (i.e., not concave) along medial margin. Axilla with lateral margin convex (
+Fig. 21
+B–C) .......................................................................................................... 15
+
+
+
+
+
+
+13. Metanotum with distinct posteromedial depression (
+Fig. 3E
+). T1–T4 with apical fasciae interrupted medially (
+Fig. 22A
+) ......................................
+
+E. axillaris
+Onuferko, 2018
+
+(
+Onuferko 2018a
+: fig. 18)
+
+
+
+
+– Metanotum without depression (
+Fig. 3F
+). T1–T4 with apical fasciae complete (
+Fig. 22B
+) .......... 14
+
+
+
+14. Preoccipital ridge joining hypostomal carina (approximately at
+2
+∕
+5
+length of proboscidial fossa) (
+Fig. 23A
+). Mandible simple (
+Fig. 24A
+) ..........
+
+E. ainsliei
+Crawford, 1932
+
+(
+Onuferko 2018a
+: fig. 4)
+
+
+
+Fig. 20.
+
+Epeolus
+
+spp., habitus of male, lateral view.
+A
+.
+
+E. bifasciatus
+Cresson, 1864
+
+.
+B
+.
+
+E. scutellaris
+Say, 1824
+
+.
+C
+.
+
+E. basili
+Onuferko, 2018
+
+, paratype.
+D
+.
+
+E. mesillae
+(Cockerell, 1895)
+
+.
+E
+.
+
+E. australis
+Mitchell, 1962
+
+.
+F
+.
+
+E. asperatus
+Cockerell, 1910
+
+. Scale bars = 3 mm.
+
+
+
+
+– Preoccipital ridge not joining hypostomal carina (
+Fig. 23B
+). Mandible with small, obtuse preapical (almost submedial) tooth (
+Fig. 24B
+) ..............
+
+E. rufulus
+Cockerell, 1941
+
+(
+Onuferko 2018a
+: fig. 81)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+15. Head dorsally with pair of small protrusions, each located where upper genal area meets vertexal area (
+Fig. 4C
+). Mesopleuron of male obscured by white tomentum only in upper half (although hypoepimeral area usually with sparser tomentum), with large, sparsely hairy circular area occupying much of ventrolateral half (
+Fig. 20B
+). Axilla in dorsal view with tip extending to or beyond band of pale tomentum along posterior margin of mesoscutellum (
+Fig. 21B
+) ................................................ .............................................................................
+
+E. scutellaris
+Say, 1824
+
+(
+Onuferko 2018a
+: fig. 83)
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 21.
+Axillae and mesoscutellum of female, dorsal view.
+A
+.
+
+E. ainsliei
+Crawford, 1932
+
+.
+B
+.
+
+E. scutellaris
+Say, 1824
+
+.
+C
+.
+
+E. basili
+Onuferko, 2018
+
+, paratype.
+D
+.
+
+E. tessieris
+Onuferko, 2018
+
+, holotype.
+E
+.
+
+E. minimus
+(Robertson, 1902)
+
+.
+F
+.
+
+E. asperatus
+Cockerell, 1910
+
+. Blue lines indicate the posterior extent of the axilla relative to the length of the mesoscutellum; red lines indicate the extent of the free portion of the axilla relative to its entire medial length. Scale bars = 0.5 mm.
+
+
+
+
+– Head dorsally without pair of protrusions (
+Fig. 4D
+). Mesopleuron of male (excluding hypoepimeral area) entirely obscured by white tomentum (
+Fig. 20C
+). Axilla in dorsal view with tip at most extending to band of pale tomentum along posterior margin of mesoscutellum (
+Fig. 21C
+) .......... 16
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 22
+A–F
+
+(continued on next page).
+
+Epeolus
+
+spp. habitus of female, dorsal view.
+A
+.
+
+E. axillaris
+Onuferko, 2018
+
+,
+paratype
+.
+B
+.
+
+E. ainsliei
+Crawford, 1932
+
+.
+C
+.
+
+E. splendidus
+Onuferko, 2018
+
+,
+paratype
+.
+D
+.
+
+E. canadensis
+Mitchell, 1962
+
+.
+E
+.
+
+E. compactus
+Cresson, 1878
+
+.
+F
+.
+
+E. ferrarii
+Onuferko, 2018
+
+,
+paratype
+. Scale bars =
+3 mm
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+16. T2–T4 each with fascia on or only very slightly separated from apical margin of tergum, more or less evenly broad. T1 with longitudinal extent of discal patch variable, but commonly less than breadth of apical fascia (
+Fig. 25A
+) ...............
+
+E. novomexicanus
+Cockerell, 1912
+
+(
+Onuferko 2018a
+: fig. 73)
+
+
+
+
+– T2 and T3 (for female) or T2–T4 (for male) each with fascia clearly separated from apical margin of tergum medially, commonly narrowed or narrowly interrupted medially. T1 with longitudinal extent of discal patch no less (and usually greater) than breadth of apical fascia (
+Fig. 25B
+) ................... 17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+17. Flagellum with ventral surface and usually also metasomal sterna same reddish brown or reddish orange color as legs (
+Fig. 26A
+) .........................
+
+E. basili
+Onuferko, 2018
+
+(
+Onuferko 2018a
+: fig. 24)
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 22G–L
+(continued).
+
+Epeolus
+
+spp., habitus of female, dorsal view.
+G
+.
+
+E. chamaesarachae
+Onuferko, 2018
+
+,
+paratype
+.
+H
+.
+
+E. flavofasciatus
+Smith, 1879
+
+.
+I
+.
+
+E. mesillae
+(Cockerell, 1895)
+
+.
+J
+.
+
+E. brumleyi
+Onuferko, 2018
+
+,
+paratype
+.
+K
+.
+
+E. asperatus
+Cockerell, 1910
+
+.
+L
+.
+
+E. barberiellus
+Cockerell, 1907
+
+. Scale bars =
+3 mm
+.
+
+
+
+
+– Entire flagellum, except sometimes F1, and metasomal sterna (excluding apical margins) dark brown or black, clearly not the same reddish-orange color as legs from tibiae to tarsi (
+Fig. 26B
+) ............... ..........................................................................
+
+E. pusillus
+Cresson, 1864
+
+(
+Onuferko 2018a
+: fig. 79)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+18. T1 without apical fascia (
+Figs 14B
+,
+18B
+) ...................................................................................... 19
+
+
+
+
+– T1 with apical fascia (
+Figs 13B
+,
+22
+C–L) ........................................................................................ 20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+19. Frontal keel without tooth-like process (
+Fig. 27A
+). Mesopleuron with punctures in ventrolateral half dense (most i<1d) (
+Fig. 5C
+). T1 with complete or medially interrupted off-white to pale yellow basal fascia (
+Fig. 14B
+). Antenna, pronotal lobe and legs reddish orange in part (
+Fig. 14
+A–C) .................. ...................................................................................................
+
+E. luteipennis
+Friese, 1916
+
+(
+Fig. 14
+)
+
+
+
+
+– Frontal keel with small tooth-like process (
+Fig. 27B
+). Mesopleuron with punctures in ventrolateral half sparse (most i>1d) (
+Fig. 5D
+). T1 without fasciae (
+Fig. 18B
+). Antenna, pronotal lobe and legs entirely dark brown to black (
+Fig. 18
+A–C) ....................................
+
+E. odyneroides
+
+sp. nov.
+(
+Fig. 18
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+20. Mesoscutum with anteromedial patch of bright or pale yellow tomentum (
+Fig. 22
+C–F) .............. 21
+
+
+
+
+– Mesoscutum with gray or bright to pale yellow paramedian band (usually parallel and not joined except sometimes posteriorly) or largely obscured by pale tomentum (
+Fig. 22
+G–L); if joined posteriorly (i.e., U- or V-shaped), then not distinctly narrowed anterolaterally ............................. 24
+
+
+
+
+
+
+21. Dorsum of mesosoma and metasoma with bright yellow short, appressed setae. T1–T4 with apical fasciae complete. T1 with little if any space between off-white basal fascia and bright yellow apical fascia (
+Fig. 22C
+) .......................................
+
+E. splendidus
+Onuferko, 2018
+
+(
+Onuferko 2018a
+: fig. 85)
+
+
+
+
+– Dorsum of mesosoma and metasoma with pale yellow short, appressed setae. At least apical fascia of T1 medially interrupted. T1 with elongate discal patch (medially as long as or longer than breadth of apical fascia) between off-white to pale yellow basal and apical fasciae (
+Fig. 22
+D–F) ............ 22
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 23.
+Head of male, posterior view.
+A
+.
+
+E. ainsliei
+Crawford, 1932
+
+, in which the preoccipital ridge joins the hypostomal carina (blue arrow).
+B
+.
+
+E. rufulus
+Cockerell, 1941
+
+, in which the preoccipital ridge does not join the hypostomal carina (blue arrow). Scale bars = 1 mm.
+
+
+
+
+
+22. T
+1 in
+dorsal view with apical fascia straight, basal fascia arched and indistinguishable from longitudinal band, such that discal patch is semicircular or triangular (
+Fig. 22D
+) ............................. ....................................................................
+
+E. canadensis
+Mitchell, 1962
+
+(
+Onuferko 2018a
+: fig. 30)
+
+
+
+
+– T
+1 in
+dorsal view with basal and apical fasciae subparallel, at angles from longitudinal band, such that discal patch is quadrangular, trapezoidal or (if fasciae thickened laterally) diamond-shaped (
+Fig. 22
+E–F) .................................................................................................................................... 23
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 24.
+Mandibles of female
+A
+.
+
+E. ainsliei
+Crawford, 1932
+
+, each of which lacks a preapical tooth.
+B
+.
+
+E. rufulus
+Cockerell, 1941
+
+, each of which has a blunt, obtuse preapical (almost submedial) tooth (blue arrow). Scale bars = 0.5 mm.
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 25.
+Metasoma of female, dorsal view.
+A
+.
+
+E. novomexicanus
+Cockerell, 1912
+
+.
+B
+.
+
+E. basili
+Onuferko, 2018
+
+, paratype. Scale bars = 2 mm.
+
+
+
+
+
+23. T1–T4 with apical fasciae broadened submedially and either narrowed or separated into rounded lobes medially (
+Fig. 22E
+) ...........................
+
+E. compactus
+Cresson, 1878
+
+(
+Onuferko 2018a
+: fig. 36)
+
+
+
+
+– T1–T4 with apical fasciae not broadened submedially; fasciae more or less evenly broad and uninterrupted medially or tapering and thus narrowed or separated medially (
+Fig. 22F
+) .................. ........................................................................
+
+E. ferrarii
+Onuferko, 2018
+
+(
+Onuferko 2018a
+: fig. 45)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+24. Vertexal area with two pairs of shiny (usually impunctate) protrusions (
+Fig. 4E
+). T1 apical fascia with pair of small posterolateral patches of black tomentum (
+Fig. 22G
+) ....................................... 25
+
+
+
+
+– Vertexal area without two pairs of protrusions, at most with single pair of closely punctate dorsal protrusions, each located where upper genal area meets vertexal area (
+Fig. 4F
+). T1 apical fascia without pair of small posterolateral patches of black tomentum (
+Fig. 22
+H–L) .............................. 26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+25. Mesopleuron with punctures in ventrolateral half sparse (few i≤1d) (
+Fig. 5E
+) .................................. .........................................................
+
+E. chamaesarachae
+Onuferko, 2018
+
+(
+Onuferko 2018a
+: fig. 34)
+
+
+
+
+– Mesopleuron with punctures in ventrolateral half dense (many i≤1d) (
+Fig. 5F
+) ................................ .................................................................
+
+E. diadematus
+Onuferko, 2018
+
+(
+Onuferko 2018a
+: fig. 41)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+26. Metanotum with blunt median process (
+Fig. 13D
+). T
+1 in
+dorsal view with discal patch in shape of rounded triangle with anterolateral sides concave (
+Fig. 13B
+) ........................................................ 27
+
+
+
+
+– Metanotum without process (
+Fig. 21
+D–F). T1 with discal patch variable, but if triangular in dorsal view then with anterolateral sides straight or convex (
+Fig. 22H
+) ................................................... 28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+27. Mesopleuron either with most interspaces between punctures small (i≤1d) throughout or rugose, with punctures ill-defined (
+Fig. 5G
+) ...................................................
+
+E. hanusiae
+
+sp. nov.
+(
+Fig. 13
+)
+
+
+
+
+– Mesopleuron with punctures in ventrolateral half well separated (i>1d), upper half more densely punctate than ventrolateral half (
+Fig. 5H
+) ........................................................................................... .................................................................
+
+E. interruptus
+Robertson, 1900
+
+(
+Onuferko 2018a
+: fig. 61)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+28. T
+1 in
+dorsal view with apical fascia straight, basal fascia arched, though in some cases widely interrupted medially, and indistinguishable from longitudinal band, such that discal patch is semicircular or triangular (
+Fig. 22H
+) ........
+
+E. flavofasciatus
+Smith, 1879
+
+(
+Onuferko 2018a
+: fig. 47)
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 26.
+
+Epeolus
+
+spp., habitus of female, ventral view.
+A
+.
+
+E. basili
+Onuferko, 2018
+
+, paratype showing antennae, legs, and metasomal sterna with similar reddish-orange coloration.
+B
+.
+
+E. pusillus
+Cresson, 1864
+
+showing color contrast between reddish-orange legs and dark brown antennae and metasomal sterna. Scale bars = 3 mm.
+
+
+
+
+– T
+1 in
+dorsal view with basal and apical fasciae subparallel, usually at angles from longitudinal band, such that discal patch is quadrangular, trapezoidal, or elliptical, but sometimes thickened laterally such that discal patch is diamond-shaped or in the shape of a pointed oval (
+Fig. 22
+I–L) .............. 29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+29. T2–T4 with apical fasciae complete, more or less evenly broad (
+Fig. 22
+I–J) ................................ 30
+
+
+
+
+– T1 and T2 with apical fasciae broken or at least greatly narrowed medially, those of T3 and T4 broken or complete (
+Fig. 22
+K–L) ................................................................................................... 32
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 27.
+Head of female, lateral view.
+A
+.
+
+E. luteipennis
+Friese, 1916
+
+, in which the frontal keel lacks a tooth-like process.
+B
+.
+
+E. odyneroides
+
+sp. nov.
+, holotype (
+KUNHM
+SM0253729), in which the frontal keel has a small tooth-like process (blue arrow).
+C
+.
+
+E. australis
+Mitchell, 1962
+
+, in which the frontal keel (blue arrow) is strongly raised.
+D
+.
+
+E. brumleyi
+Onuferko, 2018
+
+, paratype, in which the frontal keel (blue arrow) is weakly protuberant by comparison. Scale bars = 1 mm.
+
+
+
+
+
+30. Fore wing with two submarginal cells, apically dusky in female, hyaline throughout in male (
+Fig. 20D
+). Mesopleuron almost entirely obscured by tomentum, at least in male (
+Fig. 20D
+). Axilla and mesoscutellum black (
+
+Fig.
+22I
+
+) ...........
+
+E. mesillae
+(Cockerell, 1895)
+
+(
+Onuferko 2018a
+: fig. 67)
+
+
+
+
+– Fore wing with three submarginal cells, subhyaline, apically dusky in both sexes (
+Fig. 20E
+). Mesopleuron obscured by tomentum only in upper half, with a large, sparsely hairy circle occupying much of ventrolateral half (
+Fig. 20E
+). At least axilla ferruginous in part (
+Fig. 22J
+) ...................... 31
+
+
+
+
+
+
+31. Frontal keel strongly raised (
+Fig. 27C
+). Pygidial plate of male narrow (medial length ~1.5 × basal width) (
+Fig. 28A
+) ...........................................
+
+E. australis
+Mitchell, 1962
+
+(
+Onuferko 2018a
+: fig. 14)
+
+
+
+
+– Frontal keel weakly protuberant (
+Fig. 27D
+). Pygidial plate of male broad (medial length ≈ basal width) (
+Fig. 28B
+) .........................................
+
+E. brumleyi
+Onuferko, 2018
+
+(
+Onuferko 2018a
+: fig. 28)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+32. Axilla and mesoscutellum entirely ferruginous (
+Fig. 21D
+). Mesopleuron with punctures in ventrolateral half sparse (most i>1d) (
+
+Fig.
+5I
+
+) .................................................................................... .......................................................................
+
+E. tessieris
+Onuferko, 2018
+
+(
+Onuferko 2018a
+: fig. 87)
+
+
+
+
+– Axilla (except sometimes tip) and mesoscutellum black (
+Fig. 21
+E–F). Mesopleuron with punctures in ventrolateral half dense (most i≤1d) (
+Fig. 20F
+) .......................................................................... 33
+
+
+
+
+
+
+33. F2 of female at least 1.2 × as long as wide (
+Fig. 29A
+). Axilla of both sexes with free portion more than ¼ as long as its entire medial length, its tip distinctly pointed (
+Fig. 21E
+) .................................. ..................................................................
+
+E. minimus
+(Robertson, 1902)
+
+(
+Onuferko 2018a
+: fig. 69)
+
+
+
+
+– F2 of female at most 1.1 × as long as wide (
+Fig. 29B
+). Axilla of both sexes with free portion at most ¼ as long as its entire medial length, its tip broadly rounded (
+Fig. 21F
+) ....................................... 34
+
+
+
+
+
+
+34. T3 and T4 each with pair of ovate patches of pale tomentum. Legs mostly to entirely dark brown or black (
+Fig. 22K
+) .........................................
+
+E. asperatus
+Cockerell, 1910
+
+(
+Onuferko 2018a
+: fig. 10)
+
+
+
+
+– T3 and T4 each with complete or medially and/or laterally interrupted fascia. Legs mostly to entirely reddish orange (
+Fig. 22L
+) ......................
+
+E. barberiellus
+Cockerell, 1907
+
+(
+Onuferko 2018a
+: fig. 22)
+
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFB2FFF01857FCE840178A74.xml b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFB2FFF01857FCE840178A74.xml
index 185630c7b2f..72cd9e9128b 100644
--- a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFB2FFF01857FCE840178A74.xml
+++ b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFB2FFF01857FCE840178A74.xml
@@ -1,41 +1,41 @@
-
-
-
-A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
+
+
+
+A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Onuferko, Thomas M.
+Onuferko, Thomas M.
-text
-
-
-European Journal of Taxonomy
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
-
-2019
-
-2019-10-07
+
+2019
+
+2019-10-07
-
-563
+
+563
-
-1
-69
+
+1
+69
-journal article
-25281
-10.5852/ejt.2019.563
-4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
-3476748
-6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
+journal article
+10.5852/ejt.2019.563
+4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
+2118-9773
+3476748
+6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
-
+
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
15
-
+
@@ -73,13 +73,13 @@
).
+
+
Proposed common name
-
-
Black epeolus.
@@ -140,10 +140,10 @@ material
-
+
PANAMA
•
-♀
+♀
,
Tro. nigra
@@ -152,18 +152,15 @@ material
;
Chiriquí
,
-El Volcán
-Chiriquí
+El Volcán Chiriquí
;
29 Feb. 1936
;
F.E. Lutz
-leg.;
-AMNH AMNH
-_
-IZC 00324260
+leg.; AMNH
+AMNH_IZC 00324260
.
@@ -175,10 +172,10 @@ material
-
+
PANAMA
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
,
Tro. nigra
@@ -187,18 +184,15 @@ material
;
Chiriquí
,
-El Volcán
-Chiriquí
+El Volcán Chiriquí
;
23 Feb. 1936
;
F.E. Lutz
-leg.;
-AMNH AMNH
-_
-IZC 00324261
+leg.; AMNH
+AMNH_IZC 00324261
.
@@ -210,17 +204,15 @@ _
Non-barcoded material
-
+
COSTA RICA
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
;
Alajuela
,
-Alajuela
-? (
-Eladio’s
-, river trail);
+Alajuela? (Eladio’s, river trail)
+;
19 May 1989
@@ -236,7 +228,7 @@ leg.;
•
-3 ♀♀
+3 ♀♀
;
Alajuela
,
@@ -251,16 +243,13 @@ leg.;
RAM
•
-
-1 ♂
+
+1 ♂
;
Guanacaste
,
-Volcan Cacao Station
-(
-Guanacaste
-National Park
-);
+Volcan Cacao Station (Guanacaste National Park)
+;
13 Feb. 1995
diff --git a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFB5FFFD186BFDEC41128CD6.xml b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFB5FFFD186BFDEC41128CD6.xml
index 2a9fd4509d1..d955c5bdc99 100644
--- a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFB5FFFD186BFDEC41128CD6.xml
+++ b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFB5FFFD186BFDEC41128CD6.xml
@@ -1,42 +1,42 @@
-
-
-
-A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
+
+
+
+A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Onuferko, Thomas M.
+Onuferko, Thomas M.
-text
-
-
-European Journal of Taxonomy
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
-
-2019
-
-2019-10-07
+
+2019
+
+2019-10-07
-
-563
+
+563
-
-1
-69
+
+1
+69
-journal article
-25281
-10.5852/ejt.2019.563
-4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
-3476748
-6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
+journal article
+10.5852/ejt.2019.563
+4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
+2118-9773
+3476748
+6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
-
-
+
+
@@ -45,19 +45,21 @@
sp. nov.
+
+
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:
905E8BD4-657C-4323-A2F4-A08B30F3484E
-
-
Figs 7H
,
16
+
+
Proposed common name
@@ -156,19 +158,17 @@ material
-
+
MEXICO
•
-♀
+♀
,
holotype
;
Veracruz
,
-S Ixhuatlán
-(
-SE Huatusco
-);
+S Ixhuatlán (SE Huatusco)
+;
17–18 Jul. 1990
@@ -188,29 +188,28 @@ material
-
+
BELIZE
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
,
paratype
;
Stann Creek
-, Middlesex;
+,
+Middlesex
+;
18 Mar. 1965
;
E.C. Welling
leg.;
-
-CNC
-754064
-
+CNC 754064
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
,
paratype
; same collection data as for preceding;
@@ -220,10 +219,7 @@ leg.;
;
E.C. Welling
leg.;
-
-CNC
-754063
-
+CNC 754063
.
@@ -231,7 +227,7 @@ leg.;
MEXICO
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
,
paratype
;
@@ -245,11 +241,11 @@ leg.;
;
H.V. Weems Jr.
leg.;
-FSCA
+FSCA
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
,
paratype
;
@@ -270,17 +266,15 @@ leg.;
SEMC1247933
•
-
-1 ♀
+
+1 ♀
,
paratype
;
Veracruz
,
-El Desengaño
-(
-El Mirador
-);
+El Desengaño (El Mirador)
+;
19.2101° N
,
96.8966° W
@@ -291,20 +285,17 @@ leg.;
;
M. Bonet
leg.; BOLD sample ID: CCDB-28238 B01;
-
-BBSL
-0000003960
-
+BBSL 0000003960
•
-
-1 ♀
+
+1 ♀
,
paratype
;
Veracruz
,
-Estación de Biología Los Tuxtlas
+Estación de Biología Los Tuxtlas
(
33 km
diff --git a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFB8FFF81800FB33462B89F6.xml b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFB8FFF81800FB33462B89F6.xml
index 2edffb271b7..74641310e4d 100644
--- a/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFB8FFF81800FB33462B89F6.xml
+++ b/data/20/1E/87/201E87ADFFB8FFF81800FB33462B89F6.xml
@@ -1,41 +1,41 @@
-
-
-
-A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
+
+
+
+A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Onuferko, Thomas M.
+Onuferko, Thomas M.
-text
-
-
-European Journal of Taxonomy
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
-
-2019
-
-2019-10-07
+
+2019
+
+2019-10-07
-
-563
+
+563
-
-1
-69
+
+1
+69
-journal article
-25281
-10.5852/ejt.2019.563
-4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
-3476748
-6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
+journal article
+10.5852/ejt.2019.563
+4de0fe4e-219b-432f-9d36-43d2f4a41835
+2118-9773
+3476748
+6F6E082D-0675-49C1-A603-F7BABB546C46
-
+
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ C,
17
-
+
@@ -98,13 +98,13 @@ designation
syn. nov.
+
+
Proposed common name
-
-
Dark-legged epeolus.
@@ -181,10 +181,10 @@ material
-
+
COSTA RICA
•
-♂
+♂
,
E. schmidti
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ material
;
San José
,
-San José
+San José
;
May 1922
@@ -201,15 +201,15 @@ material
;
Schmidt
leg.;
-ZMB
+ZMB
.
-
+
MEXICO
•
-♂
+♂
,
E. bifasciatus obscuripes
@@ -217,15 +217,12 @@ leg.;
holotype
;
Veracruz
-, Medellín; “
-H. H. Hyde
-;
+,
+Medellín
+; “H. H. Hyde;
Baker
coll. 1785”;
-
-USNM
-534041
-
+USNM 534041
.
@@ -237,15 +234,16 @@ material
-
+
COSTA RICA
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
,
E. schmidti
-lectoallotype;
+lectoallotype
+;
Alajuela
,
San Mateo
@@ -256,7 +254,7 @@ lectoallotype;
;
Schmidt
leg.;
-ZMB
+ZMB
.
@@ -268,7 +266,7 @@ leg.;
MEXICO
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
;
Jalisco
,
@@ -279,16 +277,16 @@ leg.;
;
L. Packer
-leg.; BOLD sample ID: CCDB- 28238 A08;
+leg.; BOLD sample ID: CCDB-28238 A08;
PCYU
•
-
-1 ♀
+
+1 ♀
;
Oaxaca
-, S of
-San Sebastián Frontera
+,
+S of San Sebastián Frontera
;
18.2163° N
,
@@ -303,18 +301,17 @@ leg; BOLD sample ID: CCDB-22014 C06;
PCYU
•
-
-1 ♀
+
+1 ♀
;
Sonora
,
-Rancho Fundición
-(
-
+
+Rancho Fundición (
30 km
-E of Álamos
-
-);
+E of Álamos)
+
+;
27.0183° N
,
108.7483° W
@@ -324,8 +321,8 @@ E of Álamos
;
M.E. Irwin
-leg.; BOLD sample ID: CCDB- 28239 G08;
-BBSL
+leg.; BOLD sample ID: CCDB-28239 G08;
+BBSL
FDP124693
.
@@ -363,24 +360,20 @@ leg.;
FSCA
•
-
-1 ♀
+
+1 ♀
;
Cayo
,
-Las Cuevas Access Rd
-and
-Caracol Rd
+Las Cuevas Access Rd and Caracol Rd
;
29 Apr. 2009
;
J.S. Ascher
-leg.;
-AMNH AMNH
-_
-IZC 00290833
+leg.; AMNH
+AMNH_IZC 00290833
.
@@ -388,7 +381,7 @@ _
COSTA RICA
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
;
Puntarenas
,
@@ -400,20 +393,19 @@ _
;
T.P. Cogley
leg.;
-FSCA
+FSCA
.
-
+
EL SALVADOR
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
;
La Libertad
,
-Mount
-San Salvador
+Mount San Salvador
;
8 Jul. 1963
@@ -423,24 +415,22 @@ leg.;
and
D.Q. Cavagnaro
leg.;
-
-EMEC
-1135879
-
+EMEC 1135879
.
-
+
GUATEMALA
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
;
Alta Verapaz
,
+
5 km
-W of
-Purulhá
+W of Purulhá
+
;
11 Oct. 2005
@@ -448,22 +438,20 @@ W of
;
J.B. Heppner
leg.;
-FSCA
+FSCA
.
-
+
HONDURAS
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
;
Cortés
,
-Estación Experimental Café
-(ca.
-Peña Blanca
-rainforest);
+Estación Experimental Café (ca. Peña Blanca rainforest)
+;
15 Aug. 1992
@@ -472,25 +460,20 @@ rainforest);
and
L. Stange
leg.;
-FSCA
+FSCA
•
-
-1 ♂
+
+1 ♂
;
Santa Bárbara
,
-
-La Fé
-
-,
-Finca La Roca
-(
-
+
+La Fé, Finca La Roca (
5.3 km
-S of Peña Blanca
-
-);
+S of Peña Blanca)
+
+;
14.9500° N
,
88.0333° W
@@ -512,13 +495,13 @@ leg.;
MEXICO
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
;
-ANSP
+ANSP
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
;
Chiapas
,
@@ -539,8 +522,8 @@ leg.;
SEMC1248323
•
-
-1 ♂
+
+1 ♂
;
Chiapas
,
@@ -548,40 +531,37 @@ leg.;
32 mi
W of San Cristóbal
-(
-Jct
-190-195);
+(Jct 190-195);
20 May 1969
;
H.J. Teskey
leg.;
-
-CNC
-754056
-
+CNC 754056
•
-
-1 ♂
+
+1 ♂
;
Chiapas
,
-Palenque
-ruins;
+Palenque ruins
+;
22 Jun. 1969
;
B.V. Peterson
leg.;
-CNC
-(754061)
+CNC
+(
+754061
+)
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
;
Jalisco
,
@@ -593,16 +573,16 @@ leg.;
;
J.G. and B.L. Rozen
leg.;
-AMNH
+AMNH
•
-
-1 ♀
+
+1 ♀
;
Jalisco
,
-El
-Tuito;
+El Tuito
+;
6 Nov. 1987
@@ -614,7 +594,7 @@ leg.;
•
-2 ♀♀
+2 ♀♀
;
Jalisco
,
@@ -626,11 +606,11 @@ leg.;
;
J.G. Rozen
leg.;
-AMNH
+AMNH
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
; same collection data as for preceding;
6 Oct. 1985
@@ -638,11 +618,11 @@ leg.;
;
J.G. Rozen
leg.;
-AMNH
+AMNH
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
; same collection data as for preceding;
4 Nov. 1987
@@ -655,7 +635,7 @@ leg.;
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
;
Jalisco
,
@@ -667,27 +647,25 @@ leg.;
”;
McClendon
leg.;
-ANSP
+ANSP
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
;
Jalisco
,
Tuxpan
; “
-
-ix.4
-
+ix.4
”;
McClendon
leg.;
-ANSP
+ANSP
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
;
Morelos
,
@@ -702,14 +680,11 @@ E of Cuernavaca
;
J.G. Chillcott
leg.;
-
-CNC
-754076
-
+CNC 754076
•
-2 ♀♀
+2 ♀♀
;
Nuevo León
,
@@ -721,11 +696,11 @@ leg.;
;
D. Weems
leg.;
-FSCA
+FSCA
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
;
Oaxaca
,
@@ -742,18 +717,17 @@ S of El Camarón
and
L. Stange
leg.;
-FSCA
+FSCA
•
-
-1 ♂
+
+1 ♂
;
Puebla
,
Tepexco-Izúcar de Matamoros
-(
-Carretera Federal
-160);
+(Carretera Federal 160)
+;
18.6540° N
,
98.6595° W
@@ -764,22 +738,18 @@ leg.;
;
T.L. Griswold
leg.;
-BBSL
-
-BBSL
-334999
-
+BBSL
+BBSL334999
•
-
-1 ♀
+
+1 ♀
;
Querétaro
,
Jalpan de Serra
-(along
-Río Jalpan
-);
+(along Río Jalpan)
+;
3 Sep. 1991
@@ -791,7 +761,7 @@ leg.;
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
;
San Luis Potosí
,
@@ -806,14 +776,11 @@ W of Xilitla
;
J.G. Chillcott
leg.;
-
-CNC
-754075
-
+CNC 754075
•
-
-1 ♀
+
+1 ♀
;
San Luis Potosí
,
@@ -821,9 +788,7 @@ leg.;
9 km
N of Tamazunchale
-(
-Hwy
-85);
+(Hwy 85);
9 Jul. 1990
@@ -834,24 +799,23 @@ leg.;
SEMC1248283
•
-
-1 ♀
+
+1 ♀
;
San Luis Potosí
,
-Cascada el Salto
-(
-
+
+Cascada el Salto (
12 km
-NW of El Naranjo
+NW of El Naranjo)
-);
+;
KUNHM
SEMC1248330
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
; same collection data as for preceding;
20 May 1989
@@ -864,7 +828,7 @@ leg.;
•
-1 ♀
+1 ♀
; same collection data as for preceding;
4 Jul. 1990
@@ -877,7 +841,7 @@ leg.;
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
;
San Luis Potosí
,
@@ -893,43 +857,44 @@ leg.;
SEMC1248285
•
-
-1 ♂
+
+1 ♂
;
San Luis Potosí
,
-El
-Salto;
+El Salto
+;
19 Jun. 1973
;
H.V. Weems Jr.
leg.;
-FSCA
+FSCA
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
;
Tabasco
,
Teapa
;
-
-Mar. 1911
-
-–1924; “Godman-Salvin Collection”;
+
+Mar. 1911
+–1924
+
+; “Godman-Salvin Collection”;
KUNHM
SEMC0938794
•
-
-1 ♂
+
+1 ♂
;
Veracruz
,
-
+
8 km
S of Carrizal
@@ -944,12 +909,12 @@ leg.;
SEMC1248324
•
-
-1 ♀
+
+1 ♀
;
Veracruz
,
-Catemaco
+Catemaco
;
16–18 Jun. 1969
@@ -957,14 +922,11 @@ leg.;
;
W.R.M. Mason
leg.;
-
-CNC
-754059
-
+CNC 754059
•
-2 ♀♀
+2 ♀♀
;
Yucatán
,
@@ -976,11 +938,11 @@ leg.;
;
L.A. Stange
leg.;
-FSCA
+FSCA
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
; same collection data as for preceding;
5 Jan. 1992
@@ -988,14 +950,11 @@ leg.;
;
J.R. Vockeroth
leg.;
-
-CNC
-754062
-
+CNC 754062
•
-1 ♂
+1 ♂
; same collection data as for preceding;
17 Dec. 1993
@@ -1003,10 +962,7 @@ leg.;
;
L. Masner
leg.;
-
-CNC
-754060
-
+CNC 754060
.