diff --git a/data/08/75/BF/0875BFC4EF8851E2BBC15F65BC8F134C.xml b/data/08/75/BF/0875BFC4EF8851E2BBC15F65BC8F134C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2c97fe8cb49 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/08/75/BF/0875BFC4EF8851E2BBC15F65BC8F134C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,319 @@ + + + +A revision of the four Afrotropical and Palaearctic Sphyracephala Say (Diptera, Diopsidae) with an illustrated overview of the other five Sphyracephala + + + +Author + +Feijen, Hans R. +0000-0002-7265-8448 +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands + + + +Author + +Feijen, Frida A. A. +0000-0001-5872-8780 +ETH Zürich, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Integrative Biology (IBZ), 8092 Zürich, Switzerland & EAWAG, Aquatic Ecology, Dübendorf, Switzerland + + + +Author + +Feijen, Cobi +0000-0001-8756-3903 +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2025 + +2025-06-10 + + +1241 + + +1 +81 + + + +journal article +310381 +10.3897/zookeys.1241.151490 +b61e1f46-07df-41f0-84ab-1d49e78b9253 +E0BA0012-F063-43B8-926B-8DD47010D489 + + + + + +Sphyracephala brevicornis +( +Say, 1817 +) + + + + + +Figs 100 +, +105 +, +106 +, +107 +, +108 +, +109 +, +110–112 +, +113–115 +, +Tables 2 +, +3 +, +4 + + + + + + + +Diopsis brevicornis + +Say, 1817: 23 +. + + + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala brevicornis + +(Say): +Say 1828 +: plate LII (unpaginated). + +Portschinsky 1871: 287 + +(material from Siberia, misidentification for + +S. nigrimana + +); + +Curran 1934: 358 + +(in part, figure represents + +S. subbifasciata + +); + +Lavigne 1962: 5 + +(Lavigne - pers. comm. - later indicated that all data refer to + +S. subbifasciata + +, except for 1958 records); + +Sabrosky 1965: 638 + +(in part); + +Steyskal 1972: 13 + +(in part); + +Hochberg Stasny 1985 +: 1 + +; + +Peterson 1987: 785 + +(in part); + +Feijen 1989: 72 + +, figs 5–10, 13–40; + +Marshall 2017: 419 + +, fig. 9 on p. 510. Up to 1989, authors considered + +S. subbifasciata + +as junior synonym of + +S. brevicornis + +. Their treatment of Nearctic + +Sphyracephala + +could therefore be one of the two species or a mixture. + + + + + + + + +Achias brevicornis + +(Say): + +Wiedemann 1830: 564 + +. Wiedemann received these flies as + +A. brevicornis + +, but was convinced that they belonged to + +Diopsis + +. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala bicornis + +(Say): + +Peterson 1916: 183 + +. Error for + +S. brevicornis + +. + + + + + + + +Type series. + + +U. S. A. +: + +holotype + +, sex unknown, Wissahickon Creek near Philadelphia, +Pennsylvania +[~ + +40°8'55"N +, +75°13'14"W + +, ~ +60 m +]. It seems likely that the single type specimen of + +S. brevicornis + +has been lost. + + + + +Distribution. + + +South-Eastern corner of +Canada +, contiguous +U. S. A. +east of the line Houston-Lincoln ( +Nebraska +) - Grand Forks. + + + + +Illustrations. + + +Feijen (1989) +provided drawings of external morphology and genitalia. To this is added a set of photographs (Figs +113 +– +118 +) of habitus, head, thorax, wing, fore femur, and abdomen. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala brevicornis +, Belmont, U. + +S. A. +113 +♀, habitus, lateral view +114 +♂, head, anterior view +115 +♀, basiliform prosternum, ventral view. Scale bars: 1 mm ( +113 +); 0.2 mm ( +114, 115 +). + + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala brevicornis + +, USA +116 +♀, Lewisburg, PA, wing +117 +♂, Belmont, fore femur, outer view +118 +♀, Philadelphia, abdomen, dorsal view. Scale bars: 0.5 mm ( +116, 118 +); 0.2 mm ( +117 +). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/40/BA/5D/40BA5D1551B75867BA9005B32AB0F9D0.xml b/data/40/BA/5D/40BA5D1551B75867BA9005B32AB0F9D0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..24c55319770 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/40/BA/5D/40BA5D1551B75867BA9005B32AB0F9D0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,346 @@ + + + +A revision of the four Afrotropical and Palaearctic Sphyracephala Say (Diptera, Diopsidae) with an illustrated overview of the other five Sphyracephala + + + +Author + +Feijen, Hans R. +0000-0002-7265-8448 +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands + + + +Author + +Feijen, Frida A. A. +0000-0001-5872-8780 +ETH Zürich, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Integrative Biology (IBZ), 8092 Zürich, Switzerland & EAWAG, Aquatic Ecology, Dübendorf, Switzerland + + + +Author + +Feijen, Cobi +0000-0001-8756-3903 +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2025 + +2025-06-10 + + +1241 + + +1 +81 + + + +journal article +310381 +10.3897/zookeys.1241.151490 +b61e1f46-07df-41f0-84ab-1d49e78b9253 +E0BA0012-F063-43B8-926B-8DD47010D489 + + + + + +Sphyracephala bipunctipennis +Senior-White, 1922 + + + + + +Figs 107 +, +108 +, +109 +, +110–112 +, +142–146 +, +147–150 +, +Tables 2 +, +3 +, +4 + + + + + + + +Teleopsis bipunctipennis + +Senior-White, 1922: 165 +, pl. 13, fig. 1. + +Descamps 1957: 19 + +; + +Steyskal 1972: 11 + +. + + + + + + + + +Pseudodiopsis bipunctipennis + +(Senior-White): + +Shillito 1940: 150 + +. + +Steyskal 1977: 35 + +. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala bipunctipennis + +(Senior-White): + +Feijen 1989: 67 + +. + +Feijen 1998: 50 + +; + +Meier and Hilger 2000: 4 + +(specimens from +Thailand +, unlikely to be + +S. bipunctipennis + +); + +Baker et al. 2001: 93 + +, fig. 1 (specimens from +Malaysia +, unlikely to be + +S. bipunctipennis + +); + +Meier and Baker 2002: 334 + +(specimens from +Malaysia +, unlikely to be + +S. bipunctipennis + +); + +Feijen and Feijen 2019: 39 + +; + +Jackson 2019 + +: suppl. fig. 1 (specimens from +Malaysia +, unlikely to be + +S. bipunctipennis + +). + + + + + + + +Type series. + + + +Sri Lanka +: + +holotype + + +, Ceylon, +Indiganga +[on label], +on plant growing in the water at edge of the Suduganga river, on leaves of Liliacrans plant +[on labels], + +10.viii.1919 + +[~ + +7°29'22"N +, +80°39'46"E + +, ~ + +380 m + +] ( + +NHMUK + +) + +. + + +Paratypes + +: +7 ♀ +, +4 ♂ +, same data as holotype ( + +NHMUK + +) + +. Senior-White mentioned in description “ Type, allo-type, and ten co-types ”. + + + + +Distribution. + + +Sri Lanka +, +India +( +Karnataka +, +Tamil Nadu +),? +Bhutan +. Specimens from +Bhutan +still require confirmation. + + + + +Illustrations. + + +Senior-White (1922) +gave a schematic drawing of the wing. +Meier and Hilger (2000 +: figs 12–17, 115, 116, 118) presented photographs of the egg, but these are unlikely to represent + +S. bipunctipennis + +. +Feijen and Feijen (2019) +gave photographs of habitus and head. Life photographs are available (e. g., +https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/53700018 +© Amila P. Sumanapala). Here, photographs (Figs +142 +– +150 +) of habitus, head, thorax, wing, fore femur, and abdomen are presented. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala bipunctipennis + +142 +Matale, Sri Lanka (photograph © Amila P. Sumanapala) +143 +♀, Tamil Nadu, India, habitus, dorsal view +144 +♂, paratype, Indiganga, Sri Lanka, habitus, dorsal view +145 +♂, paratype, head, anterior view +146 +♀, paratype, head, anterior view. Scale bar: 1 mm ( +143 +, +144 +); 0.5 mm ( +145 +, +146 +). + + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala bipunctipennis + +, +147 +, +149 +, +150 +♂, paratype, Indiganga, Sri Lanka, +148 +♀, Tamil Nadu, India +147 +wing +148 +fore femora, lateral view +149 +precoxal bridge of prosternum, ventral view +150 +abdomen, dorsal view. Scale bars: 1 mm ( +147 +); 0.2 mm ( +148, 150 +); 0.1 mm ( +149 +). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/4A/32/9B/4A329B7FCE39584DBC57E93F588E751E.xml b/data/4A/32/9B/4A329B7FCE39584DBC57E93F588E751E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2e4f4e27a48 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/4A/32/9B/4A329B7FCE39584DBC57E93F588E751E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1794 @@ + + + +A revision of the four Afrotropical and Palaearctic Sphyracephala Say (Diptera, Diopsidae) with an illustrated overview of the other five Sphyracephala + + + +Author + +Feijen, Hans R. +0000-0002-7265-8448 +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands + + + +Author + +Feijen, Frida A. A. +0000-0001-5872-8780 +ETH Zürich, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Integrative Biology (IBZ), 8092 Zürich, Switzerland & EAWAG, Aquatic Ecology, Dübendorf, Switzerland + + + +Author + +Feijen, Cobi +0000-0001-8756-3903 +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2025 + +2025-06-10 + + +1241 + + +1 +81 + + + +journal article +310381 +10.3897/zookeys.1241.151490 +b61e1f46-07df-41f0-84ab-1d49e78b9253 +E0BA0012-F063-43B8-926B-8DD47010D489 + + + + + +Sphyracephala beccarii +( +Rondani, 1873 +) + + + + + +Figs 2 +, +4 +, +33–36 +, +37 +, +38–42 +, +43–47 +, +48–53 +, +105 +, +106 +, +107 +, +108 +, +109 +, +110–112 +, +Tables 2 +, +3 +, +4 + + + + + + + +Diopsis beccarii + +Rondani, 1873: 289 +. + + + + + + + + +Hexechopsis beccarii + +(Rondani): + +Rondani 1875: 442 + +. + + +Osten +Sacken 1882: 235 + + +; + +Brunetti 1907: 163 + +; + +Bezzi 1922: 71 + +; + +Eggers 1925: 488 + +, 493; + +Séguy 1949: 74 + +, + +1955: 1123 + +. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala beccarii + +(Rondani): + + +Osten +Sacken 1882: 235 + + +. + +Bezzi 1922: 69 + +; + +Brunetti 1928: 273 + +; + +Curran 1928: 274 + +; + +Hennig 1941 a +: 62 + +, + +1941 b +: 6 + +, figs 1, 5 d, 1965: figs 46, 49 c, 58 a; + +Séguy 1949: 75 + +, figs 6, 7; 1950: 276; + +Vaillant 1953: 11 + +, figs on p. 12; + +Collart 1954: 329 + +; + +Lindner 1954: 28 + +; + +1962 + +; 17; + +Séguy 1955: 1124 + +; + +Guiglia 1957: 194 + +; + +Descamps 1957: 17 + +, figs 7 b – 7 f; + +van Bruggen 1961: 425 + +, figs 12, 15; + +Steyskal 1972: 13 + +; + +Feijen 1978: 19 + +; + +1983 + +: fig. 5; 1987: 420; 1989: 67; + +Cogan and Shillito 1980: 584 + +; + +Ferrar 1987 + +: figs 28.34, 28.49, 28.62, 28.63, table 28.1; + +Rossi 1990: 3 + +; + +Blackith and Guillet 1995: 66 + +; + +Jakobs 1997: 13 + +; + +McAlpine 1997: 172 + +, figs 23, 24, 27; 2011: 150, figs 123, 125; + +Papp et al. 1997: 137 + +; + +Hariri et al. 1998: 254 + +, tabs 1–4; + +Baker 1999 + +: tab 2-1, figs 2-2, 2-3, app. A; + +Lande and Wilkinson 1999 + +: table 1; + +Wilkinson and Taper 1999: 1687 + +, fig. 1, table 1; + +Simova-Tošić and Stojanović 2000: 149 + +; + +Hilger 2000: 337 + +, figs 7.3–7.7; + +Meier and Hilger 2000: 6 + +, figs 9–11, table 2; + +Baker and Wilkinson 2001 + +: figs 2, 3, table 1; + +Baker et al. 2001 + +: figs 1, 2; + +Hurley et al. 2001: 408 + +, 1 C-E, 2 D, 3 C (as +beccarri +); + +Hurley 2002: 2 + +, figs 1.3, 2.1. C-E, 2.2. D. 2.3. C; + +Meier and Baker 2002: 333 + +, figs 1 b, 2; + +Cotton 2004: 2 + +, figs 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, table 4.1; + +Cotton et al. 2004: 1310 + +, figs 1-3, table 1; + +Chapman et al. 2005: 534 + +; + +Carr et al. 2005: 403 + +, figs 4, 5, 2006 a: 5, figs +1 g +, 2, 2006 b: fig. 22; + +Warren and Smith 2007 + +: figs 1 a, 2, 3 b, 3 d; + +Carr 2008: 114 + +, fig. 1, table 1; + +Dawah and Abdullah 2008: 89 + +; + +Ribak et al. 2009 + +; 861, figs 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, table 1; + +Hauser et al. 2011: 765 + +, figs 1–3; + +O’Hara et al. 2011: 96 + +; + +Baker et al. 2012: 2368 + +; + +Marshall 2012 + +: fig. 8 on p. 473; + +El-Hawagry et al. 2013: 60 + +, + +2016: 124 + +, + +2017: 17 + +; + +Voje and Hansen 2013 + +: figs 1, 2, tab 1; + +Baker et al. 2016: 898 + +, figs 1, 2, table 1; + +Feijen et al. 2017: 76 + +, figs 1, 5, 11, 17, 18, 20; + +Feijen et al. 2018: 142 + +, figs 189, 194, 199; + +Mader 2017: 108 + +; + +Nartshuk 2017: 129 + +; + +Jackson 2019 + +: suppl. fig. 1, 2; + +Picker et al. 2019: 344 + +; + +Grace and Carr 2020: 18 + +/ 24, table 1; + +Feijen and Feijen 2021: 1484 + +, figs 4, 48; 2022: 1111, fig. 9.56 a; 2023: 84. [Given the frequent spelling errors in beccarii (1 or 2 c’s, 1 or 2 r’s, 1 or 2 i’s), this should be taken into account for digital searches.] + + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala africana + +Karsch, 1888: 380 +, pl. 4 fig. 11. + +Speiser 1910: 166 + +, + +1924: 100 + +; + +Eggers 1925: 493 + +; + +Brunetti 1926: 84 + +, + +1928: 273 + +; + +Curran 1928: 274 + +; + +Séguy 1933: 32 + +, + +1938: 237 + +, + +1949: 75 + +, + +1955: 1124 + +; + +Collart 1954: 329 + +; + +Lindner 1954: 28 + +; + +Descamps 1957: 17 + +; + +van Bruggen 1961: 426 + +; + +Steyskal 1972: 13 + +; + +Feijen 1978: 20 + +; + +Cogan and Shillito 1980: 584 + +; + +Feijen et al. 2017: 76 + +. + + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala hearseiana + +(Westwood): + +Bezzi 1922: 69 + +, +Algeria +(misidentification). + +Hennig 1941 b +: 6 + +; + +Séguy 1955: 1124 + +; + +van Bruggen 1961: 426 + +. + + + + + + + +Type series. + + + + + +Sphyracephala +( +Diopsis +) +beccarii + + +. +Eritrea +: +Sciotel +, +Bogos +[1870, + +15°35'N +, +38°20'E + +, + +780 m + +], 61 + +syntypes + +in + +MSNG + +( + +Sforzi +and +Sommaggio +2021 + +), more +syntypes +in various other museums ( +MLUH +, +NHMUK +) + +. No +lectotype +has been nominated ( +Sforzi and Sommaggio 2021 +), although +Guiglia (1957) +mentioned “ Tipo e numerosi cotipi ”. + + + + + +Sphyracephala africana + + +. +Tanzania +: + +holotype + +, + +, +Bondei +, [~ +5°00'S +, +39°00'E +, + +100 m + +, + +i.1886 + +/ 87], + +ZMHB + + +. The holotype is not listed in +Rohlfien and Ewald (1970) +, but it is present in the +ZMHB +collection (Sven Marotzke, pers. comm. 2024). + + + + +Material examined. + + +It would go too far to list all the + +S. beccarii + +we have examined since 1971. Here we only list the totals examined per country or region: +Eritrea +, + +syntypes + +3 ♀ +, +3 ♂ +, Sciotel, Bogos, 1870, O. Beccari ( + +MLUH + +, V. Röder collection); +Algeria +, 1? sex, Rhouffi, +vii. 1949 +, Vaillant ( + +ZSM + +); Arabian Peninsula +75 ♀ +, +80 ♂ +(see +Feijen et al. 2017 +); +Benin +, +1 ♀ +( + +RMNH + +); +Botswana +, +1 ♀ +( + +RMNH + +); +Burkina Faso +, +1 ♂ +( + +RMNH + +); +Cameroon +, +1 ♀ +( + +BMSA + +); +DR Congo +, +3 ♀ +, +5 ♂ +( + +CSCA + +); +Ethiopia +, +2 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +( + +FBUB + +); +Gambia +1 ♀ +( + +RMNH + +); +Ghana +, +19 ♀ +, +14 ♂ +( + +RMNH + +, + +CSCA + +); +Kenya +, +4 ♀ +, +4 ♂ +( + +RMNH + +); +Madagascar +, +528 ♀ +, +276 ♂ +( + +CAS + +); +Malawi +, +314 ♀ +, +322 ♂ +, 1971–1975 ( + +RMNH + +); +Mozambique +, +131 ♀ +, +135 ♂ +, 1976–1982 ( + +RMNH + +); +Niger +, +8 ♀ +( + +RMNH + +); +Senegal +, +2 ♀ +( + +RMNH + +); +South Africa +6 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +( + +RMNH + +); +Tanzania +, +26 ♀ +, +35 ♂ +, 1982–1988 ( + +RMNH + +); +Togo +, +17 ♀ +, +32 ♂ +( + +FBUB + +, + +SMF + +, + +RMNH + +; +Zambia +, +1 ♀ +( + +RMNH + +); +Zimbabwe +7 ♀ +, +2 ♂ +( + +AMGS + +, + +RMNH + +). In total +622 ♀ +and +635 ♂ +were examined for Continental Africa and the Arabian Peninsula, giving a balanced sex-ratio of +100 ♀ +: +102 ♂ +. However, a different picture emerged for +Madagascar +: +528 ♀ +and +276 ♂ +were found, based on 84 malaise trapping periods in 2002–2004, which gives a sex-ratio of +100 ♀ +: +52 ♂ +(see also Table +4 +). This striking difference will be discussed in the section on sex-ratio. + + + + +Diagnosis. + + + +Sphyracephala beccarii + +can be recognised by the following set of characters: head brown, thorax and abdomen blackish brown; sparsely covered with small setulae; frons with dark brown semicircular band; occiput yellowish brown; eye stalk stout (~ 0.75–0.80 × the widest sagittal eye diameter), moderately sized for a + +Sphyracephala + +; very small eye span (~ +2.1 mm +) in both + +and + +(respectively ~ 49 % and ~ 53 % of body length); monomorphic with rate of dimorphism D = 0.07; distinct precoxal bridge; apical seta / scutellar spine ratio: ~ 3.9; scutellar spine / scutellum ratio: 0.50; small, pale scutellar spines ~ +0.17 mm +; transparent wings; fore femur brown with apical fifth dark brown, inner side with dark brown transverse stripe on central third, strongly incrassate, +l / w +ratio: 2.5–2.6, with two rows of black spinous setae, inner row with ~ 6.0 setae, outer row with ~ 1.2 setae; tergite 1 with vague transverse ridges, on the meson two parallel, longitudinal grooves; intersternite 1-2 very slender, laterally connected to main sternite 2; + +tergite 7 and sternite 7 divided in two small sclerites almost touching laterally; + +cerci broad, +l / w +ratio: ~ 1.9; + +sternite 8 represented by two small sclerites, almost touching on the meson; no sclerotised ring; surstyli articulate, almost touching on the meson, tapering apically towards an upturned apex, anterior side with microtrichia on basal third and ~ 25 setulae on apical half. + +Sphyracephala beccarii + +belongs to the + +S. hearseiana + +species group and can be considered the sister species of + +S. hearseiana + +. + + + + +Redescription. + + +The following redescription considers the original descriptions by +Rondani (1873) +and +Karsch (1888) +, description and figures by +Hennig (1941 b +: figs 1, 5 d; 1965: figs 46, 49 c, 58 a), +Séguy (1949 +: figs 6, 7), +Vaillant (1953 +: figs on p. 12), the table of differences between + +S. beccarii + +and + +S. munroi + +by +Collart (1954) +, descriptions and figures by +Descamps (1957 +: fig. 7 b – f), description and illustrations by +van Bruggen (1961 +: figs 13, 14, 16), +Feijen (1983 +: fig. 5), description and figures of antenna by +McAlpine (1997: 172 +, figs 23, 24, 27; 2011, figs 123, 125), figures by +Hilger (2000 +: figs 7.3–7.7), egg description and figures by +Meier and Hilger (2000 +: figs 9–11). + + +Measurements +. Body length + +4.26 mm +± +SE +0.04 (range 3.54–4.64, +n += 40), + +3.91 mm +± 0.04 (range 3.32–4.27, +n += 40), eye span + +2.09 mm +± 0.02 (range 1.75–2.31, +n += 40), + +2.08 mm +± 0.02 (range 1.78–2.27, +n += 40); wing length + +3.46 mm +± 0.04 (range 3.17–3.60, +n += 10), + +3.09 mm +± 0.08 (range 2.75–3.54, +n += 10); length of scutellar spine + +0.176 ± 0.004 (range +0.169 +–0.193 +, +n += 10), + +0.171 mm +± 0.004 (range +0.145 +–0.193 +, +n += 10). +Baker and Wilkinson (2001) +found + +mean body length +4.97 mm +, + +4.50 mm +; + +mean eye span +2.10 mm +, + +2.05 mm +. + + +Head +. Central head (Figs +33 +, +34 +, +36 +) brown, arcuate groove dark brown; frons with dark brown semicircular band running from arcuate groove via base of inner vertical seta to ocellar tubercle; stalks dorsally and posteriorly largely blackish; occiput yellowish brown, slightly darker dorsally; head uniformly pruinose (Figs +34 +, +36 +), head with a few small black setulae dorsally, ventrally more and longer whitish setulae; arcuate groove distinct blackish; frons with rectangular elevation below ocellar tubercle, grooves laterally of elevation; face flat, no facial teeth, lateroventral corners rounded, facial sulcus absent, but ventral facial edges slightly turned upward medially; eye stalk stout, ~ 0.75–0.80 × the widest sagittal eye diameter; eye span very small in both female (49.2 % ± +SE +0.1 % of body length, +n += 40) and male (53.3 % ± +SE +0.1 % of body length, +n += 40); a monomorphic species with rate of dimorphism D = 0.07 (Figs +37 +, +105 +, +106 +, Table +2 +); inner vertical seta long,> +0.4 mm +, 1.2 × diameter of eye stalk; outer vertical seta long,> +0.3 mm +, 0.9 × diameter of eye stalk (Figs +34 +, +36 +). A drawing of the antenna is provided by +Feijen (1983 +: fig. 5). +McAlpine (2011 +: figs 123, 125) provided a scanning electron microscope picture of the conus of the pedicel and a drawing of funiculus and basal segments of arista. +McAlpine (1997 +: figs 23, 24) discussed the taxonomic importance of the ultrastructure of the face and provided electron micrographs of the lower part of face and parafacials and the microtrichose crazed cuticle of face. In a thesis, +Jakobs (1997) +studied the fine structure of the optical system. Jakobs measured +30 females +and +30 males +. She found for ratio eye span / body length in females 44.4 % and in males 45.8 %, whereas she found a rate of dimorphism D = 0.05, clearly indicating a monomorphic species. +Baker and Wilkinson (2001) +found for ratio eye span / body length in females 42.3 % and in males 45.6 %, whereas they found a rate of dimorphism D = 0.20 which still qualifies + +S. beccarii + +as a monomorphic species. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala beccarii + +33 +live photograph, Mikumi, Tanzania (photograph © Stephen Marshall) +34 +♂, head, anterior view, Wadi Maharish, Saudi Arabia +35 +♀, thorax, lateral view, Mahavelo Forest, Madagascar +36 +♀, thorax, dorsal view, Niamey, Niger. Scale bars: 0.5 mm. + + + +Thorax +. Collar, scutum and scutellum blackish brown with few small setulae (Figs +35 +, +36 +), scutum and scutellum with fine granulated structure; scutellar spines whitish with brown base; pleura blackish brown, uniformly pruinose; posterior notopleural seta quite long; infra-alar seta long, almost twice length of notopleural seta (Fig. +36 +); supra-alar carina indistinct; distinct precoxal bridge (Fig. +2 +); scutal length / scutal width ratio: 0.85; scutellum trapezoid, narrowing distally; scutellar spines small, straight, slightly turned upward, diverging at angle of ~ 60 °; scutellar spine / scutellum ratio: 0.50 ± 0.01 ( +n += 25, see Table +3 +); scutellar spine / length of body ratio: 0.044 ± 0.001 ( +n += 20); apical seta / scutellar spine ratio: 3.89 ± 0.07 ( +n += 25); scutellar length / scutellar width (at base) ratio: 0.69 ± 0.01 ( +n += 20). +McAlpine (1997 +: fig. 27) illustrated the median ventral region of sternopleura, showing double series of pits. + + +Wing +. Transparent with only the faintest brownish hue (Fig. +38 +); vein CuA + CuP from vein CuP onward extending under angle of 45 ° to two-thirds of wing margin in straight line; vein M 4 continuing distal of crossvein dm-m to one quarter of distance to wing margin; cell cua very narrow, width near base and apex equal (Fig. +38 +); crossvein h distinct; glabrous area only includes basal quarter of cell br. Wing pictures were provided by +van Bruggen (1961 +: fig. 12). +Hilger (2000 +: fig. 3), +Feijen et al. (2017 +: fig. 11) and +Feijen and Feijen (2018 +: fig. 189). In the drawing by Hilger, cell cua is clearly misrepresented. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala beccarii + +, eye span plotted against body length. + + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala beccarii + +38 +♂, wing, Diampwe Malawi +39, 40 +♀, fore femur, Wadi Maharish, Saudi Arabia +39 +inner view +40 +outer view +41 +♂, Limbe, Malawi, fore leg, inner view +42 +♀, Dedza, Malawi, abdomen, dorsal view. Scale bars: 0.5 mm ( +38, 41, 42 +); 0.2 mm ( +39, 40 +). + + + + +Legs +. + +Fore coxa and trochanter very pale, thinly pruinose, with some setulae; fore femur (Figs +39–41 +) brown, thinly pruinose, apical fifth dark brown on inner and outer side, inner side with dark brown transverse band, dorsally connected to dark apex, sparsely clothed in small setulae; fore tibia dark brown, thinly pruinose; basitarsus brown, other tarsomeres pale, thinly pruinose and with rows of blackish setulae (Fig. +41 +); mid and hind legs pale brown, femora with dark brown apical third, hind tibia with dark brown apex; fore femur strongly incrassate (Table +2 +), +l / w +ratio: 2.48 ± +SE +0.02 in + +( +n += 10) and 2.53 ± +0.03 in + +n += 15); fore femur with two rows of black spinous setae on distal half with in + +7.5 ± +SE +0.2 setae ( +n += 16) and in + +6.8 ± 0.2 ( +n += 16) setae, inner row with 6.0 ± 0.1 ( +n += 32) setae and outer row with 1.2 ± 0.1 setae ( +n += 32), two rows of tubercles on distal three-quarters with in + +49.8 ± 0.8 tubercles ( +n += 16) and in + +46.9 ± 0.6 ( +n += 16), inner row with 22.3 ± 0.2 ( +n += 32) tubercles and outer row with 26.1 ± 0.3 ( +n += 32) tubercles. +Curran’s (1928) +key separating + +S. beccarii + +from + +S. munroi + +by the “ Tibiæ and tarsi largely or wholly yellowish ” for the former and the tibiae and tarsi brown for the latter should be disregarded. Already in +Rondani’s (1873) +description it was clearly stated “ antici .... tibiis, et metatarso nigricantibus ”. +Collart (1954) +in his table indicated as differential characters for + +S. beccarii + +that the fore femur was strongly incrassate, hind tibia only black at apex and for + +S. munroi + +that the fore femur was moderately incrassate, hind tibia completely black. + + +Preabdomen +. Tergites (Fig. +42 +) blackish brown, thinly pruinose, small setulae laterally; tergite 1 with very vague transverse ridges, on the meson two parallel, longitudinal grooves (Fig. +42 +); suture between tergites 1 and 2 just visible; sternites 1–6 brown, all covering the width of the abdomen, sternite 1 and basal half of sternite 2 glossy, other sternites thinly pruinose, sparsely clothed in small white setulae; sternite 1 short, trapezoid; intersternite 1-2 absent, sternite 2 a uniform, slightly trapezoid plate (Fig. +46 +); sternites 3–6 rectangular. + + +Female postabdomen +. Postabdomen short, broad (Fig. +43 +); tergite 7 represented by two small, strongly sclerotised, laterally located, sclerites; tergite 8 (Fig. +45 +) two square, thinly pruinose, sclerites, laterally located, broadly separated on the meson; tergum 10 short, extending posteriorly on the meson, thinly pruinose, one pair of apical setulae; cerci broad, +l / w +ratio: ~ 1.9, clothed in microtrichia and setulae; sternite 7 consisting of two small, strongly sclerotised, laterally located, angular sclerites, almost touching tergite 7; spiracle 7 located in membrane in between sternites 6 and 7 (Fig. +43 +); sternite 8 represented by two small sclerites, almost touching on the meson (Fig. +4 +), near the genital pore, clothed in microtrichia, 6 pairs of long setulae and some small setulae; subanal plate (Fig. +44 +) kidney-shaped with rounded apex and rounded anterolateral corners, apex with one pair of longer setulae, clothed in microtrichia and a few pairs of small setulae; spermathecae (Fig. +47 +) mushroom-shaped with large, bell-shaped, hollow, more sclerotised, striated, inner structure, no protuberances; sclerotised ring of ventral vagina absent. +Hilger (2000 +: figs 4, 5) provides detailed drawings of ventral and lateral views of the postabdomen. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala beccarii + +, ♀, +43, 44, 47 +Maputo. Mozambique, +45, 46 +Zomba, Malawi +43 +postabdomen, ventral view +44 +subanal plate, ventral view +45 +tergite 8, 10 and cerci, dorsal view +46 +sternites 1 and 2, ventral view +47 +spermathecae. Scale bars: 0.2 mm ( +43, 46 +); 0.1 mm ( +44, 45, 47 +). + + + +Male postabdomen +. Syntergosternite 7 + 8 very slender, extending the width of the abdomen, slightly angular on the meson (Fig. +53 +); spiracles +7 in +membrane; epandrium (Fig. +48 +) rounded, clothed in microtrichia and ~ 30 pairs of setulae; surstyli articulate, almost encircled by the epandrium, nearly touching on the meson, tapering apically towards an upturned apex (Figs +48–50 +), outer side with microtrichia on basal third, apical half with ~ 25 setulae (Fig. +49 +), inner side with only a few small setulae on apical half (Fig. +50 +); surstyli interconnected via broad processus longi; cerci tapering basally and apically, broadest at one-third from apex (Fig. +48 +), length / broadest width ratio: 2.8, clothed in microtrichia and on apical half with more than 30 setulae; phallapodeme (Fig. +52 +) with slender anterior arm, corners pointed, anterior arm slightly longer than posterior arm, lateral processes “ vane ” broad; phallus broad, short, male genital process hardly sticking out from apex; ejaculatory apodeme straight, very slender (Fig. +51 +), ejaculatory sac normal-sized. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala beccarii + +, ♂, Diampwe River, Malawi +48 +epandrium, cerci, surstyli, posterior view +49 +surstylus, outer view +50 +surstylus, inner view +51 +ejaculatory apodeme and sac +52 +phallapodeme +53 +syntergosternite 7 + 8, anterodorsal view. Scale bars: 0.1 mm. + + + +Hennig (1941 b +: figs 1, 5 d) illustrated the inner genitalia and epandrium with surstylus. +Vaillant (1953 +: figs on p. 12) presents drawings of the postabdomen, but the surstylus is shown as fused to the epandrium, syntergosternite is lacking and the terms ventral and dorsal should be reversed. + + +Van Bruggen (1961) +stated that male genitalia in + +Sphyracephala + +“ are too uniform to facilitate identification of the species ”. However, +Hennig (1941 b +) already stated that + +S. beccarii + +and + +S. hearseiana + +are extraordinarily similar, but can be distinguished by epandrium and surstyli (see also Figs +48 +, +49 +and Figs +132 +, +133 +). +Hilger (2000 +: figs 6, 7) gives drawings of the lateral views of male postabdomen and the phallic complex while +Feijen and Feijen (2021 +: fig. 48) give a posterior view of the epandrium. + + + +Egg +, +larva +, +and pupa + +. +Descamps (1957) +was the first to note the reticulation of the chorion of the egg as “ non strié longitudinalement ” and “ un fin réseau de petits polygones irréguliers. ” +Feijen (1989) +stated that the absence of longitudinal ridges might represent a apomorphic character for + +Sphyracephala + +. +Meier and Hilger (2000) +studying three + +Sphyracephala + +including + +S. beccarii + +, stated that the eggs are “ entirely covered with hexagonal reticulation, chorion never striated ”. They considered the egg ornamentation as a diagnostic character for the genus. Micrographs were provided of dorsal egg, micropyle, posterior pole ( +Meier and Hilger 2000 +: figs 9, 10, 11). +Descamps (1957) +stated that eggs are laid on decomposing plant material. +Descamps (1957 +: pl. 7, figs c – f) described larva and puparium and illustrated larval cephaloskeleton, larval posterior spiracles and puparium. + + + + +Biology. + + +Descamps (1957) +reared + +S. beccarii + +in +Cameroon +. Eggs were laid on decomposing plant matter. Descamps described the saprophagous larvae and the time the various stages take. From egg to fly took approximately two weeks. Descamps indicated that + +S. beccarii + +often constitute large swarms in the dry season. The flies then disperse at the start of the rainy season. In +Algeria +, +Vaillant (1953) +detected among rocks in an oasis swarms of + +S. beccarii + +. +Feijen (1984) +found in the dry season in +Malawi +among rocks in a river bedding a dense mass of + +S. beccarii + +. After being disturbed they flew up. A single sweep of a net yielded more than 6,000 specimens. The size of the whole mass was estimated to be approximately 100,000 specimens, while the cluster took up an area of less than +0.2 m +2 +. +Feijen et al. (2017) +described and illustrated a cluster of more than + +80,000 + +S. beccarii + + +on a tree trunk near a river in Wadi Darbat, +Oman +. +Picker et al. (2019) +recorded for +South Africa +that + +S. beccarii + +forms groups in moist, rocky places near water. Their idea that these flies mimic small jumping spiders appears unlikely. +Mader (2017) +mentions for + +S. beccarii + +the antipodal position during copulation. However, all photographs for + +Sphyracephala + +and other diopsids show an epipodal position during copulation. +Descamps (1957) +noted that copulation takes several hours in + +S. beccarii + +. + + +Rossi (1990) +described + +Stigmatomyces beccarii + +( +Laboulbeniales +) from + +S. beccarii + +, while + +Stigmatomyces elongatus + +was described from + +S. munroi + +. Both new fungi were described from flies from +Malawi +. It is interesting to note that these two sympatric + +Sphyracephala + +were parasitised by very different + +Stigmatomyces + +. +Hariri et al. 1998 +recorded the presence of the bacteria Type A + +Wolbachia + +in + +S. beccarii + +. + +Wolbachia + +can be associated with female-biased sex ratio distortion. As we report on a female-biased sex ratio in + +S. beccarii + +from +Madagascar +only, it would be interesting to compare the +Wolbachia’s +in flies from +Madagascar +and mainland Africa. +Carr (2008) +found no evidence for the presence of subfamilies of transposable elements in + +S. beccarii + +, though three independent lineages were found in + +S. babadjanidesi + +(as + +S. europaea + +). + + +Some minor contradictions are found in the records for the rate of dimorphism for + +S. beccarii + +. +Wilkinson and Taper (1999) +considered + +S. beccarii + +a monomorphic species. They found an eye span / body length ratio of 0.44 for + +and 0.47 for + +(we found 0.49 and 0.53 respectively). As rate of dimorphism, they gave +D +0.54–0.35 = 0.19 (we found D 0.56 - 0.49 = 0.07, see Fig. +37 +). The same data were presented in +Baker and Wilkinson (2001) +, but due to a difference in rounding off a +D +of 0.20 is given, while + +S. beccarii + +was classified as a dimorphic species. +Jakobs (1997) +found an eye span / body length ratio of 44.4 % for + +and 45.8 % for + +, and a rate of dimorphism D = 0.05, indicating a monomorphic species. +Carr et al. (2005) +stated that + +S. beccarii + +has identical mean eye span in males and females, but female body size is greater, leading to sexual dimorphism in relative eye span. However, that is not the way the rate of dimorphism is determined in +Diopsidae +, cf. +Baker and Wilkinson (2001) +and +Feijen and Feijen (2009 +, +2021 +). Referring to the data of +Baker and Wilkinson (2001) +, +Cotton et al. (2004 +a) considered + +S. beccarii + +a species with only slight (or weak) sexual dimorphism for eye span. +Chapman et al. (2005) +considered + +S. beccarii + +a sexually monomorphic species. +Ribak et al. (2009) +found for + +S. beccarii + +no significant differences in the mass-adjusted eye-span between the sexes. +Voje and Hansen (2013) +used for + +S. beccarii + +the data of +Baker and Wilkinson (2001) +. Their calculations of allometric slope and intercept were based on the least-squares regression of log eye span as function of log body size. Accordingly, they found that slope and intercept are different between the sexes at the 95 % confidence level. + + + + +Distribution. + + + +Sphyracephala beccarii + +is known to occur in almost all contiguous Sub-Saharan African countries and +Madagascar +. We have seen specimens or records from +Benin +, +Botswana +, +Burkina Faso +, +Burundi +, +Cameroon +, +Chad +, D. R. +Congo +, +Eritrea +, +Eswatini +, +Djibouti +, +Ethiopia +, +Gambia +, +Ghana +, +Kenya +, +Malawi +, Mali, +Mozambique +, +Namibia +, +Niger +, +Nigeria +, +Rwanda +, +Senegal +, +South Africa +, +Sudan +, +Tanzania +, +Togo +, +Uganda +, +Zambia +, and +Zimbabwe +. + + + +Sphyracephala beccarii + +extends into the Palaearctic Region in +Algeria +( +Bezzi 1922 +, +Hennig 1941 b +, +Séguy 1949 +, +Vaillant 1953 +). Bezzi referred the Algerian flies to + +S. hearseiana + +, but Hennig considered that a likely misidentification for + +S. beccarii + +, while Séguy confirmed that the two flies studied by Bezzi belonged to + +S. beccarii + +. Vaillant illustrated male genitalia of his Algerian flies and provided reliable information on habitat and swarming. Only his assumptions on the predatory nature of these flies must be rejected. We examined a specimen collected in +1949 in +Algeria +by Vaillant ( + +ZSM + +). +Papp et al. (1997) +considered + +S. beccarii + +“ an Afrotropical species with one questionable record from +Algeria +”. However, there is no reason to consider the Algerian records as doubtful. Moreover, +Séguy (1950) +recorded + +S. beccarii + +for Monts Bagzane in northern +Niger +, not far from +Algeria +. + +Sphyracephala beccarii + +also extends into the Palaearctic Region in the Arabian Peninsula ( +Feijen et al. 2017 +). An extensive number of records were provided for +Oman +, +Saudi Arabia +, the +United Arab Emirates +and +Yemen +. They discussed the delimitation of the Afrotropical and Palaearctic Regions in the Arabian Peninsula. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/6D/23/E0/6D23E0AA7D8E5A79A676DC04E972399B.xml b/data/6D/23/E0/6D23E0AA7D8E5A79A676DC04E972399B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4fdc1e1cb5c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/6D/23/E0/6D23E0AA7D8E5A79A676DC04E972399B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,367 @@ + + + +A revision of the four Afrotropical and Palaearctic Sphyracephala Say (Diptera, Diopsidae) with an illustrated overview of the other five Sphyracephala + + + +Author + +Feijen, Hans R. +0000-0002-7265-8448 +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands + + + +Author + +Feijen, Frida A. A. +0000-0001-5872-8780 +ETH Zürich, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Integrative Biology (IBZ), 8092 Zürich, Switzerland & EAWAG, Aquatic Ecology, Dübendorf, Switzerland + + + +Author + +Feijen, Cobi +0000-0001-8756-3903 +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2025 + +2025-06-10 + + +1241 + + +1 +81 + + + +journal article +310381 +10.3897/zookeys.1241.151490 +b61e1f46-07df-41f0-84ab-1d49e78b9253 +E0BA0012-F063-43B8-926B-8DD47010D489 + + + + + +Sphyracephala detrahens +Walker, 1860 + + + + + +Figs 107 +, +108 +, +109 +, +110–112 +, +134–136 +, +137–141 +, +Tables 2 +, +3 +, +4 + + + + + + + +Diopsis detrahens + +Walker, 1860: 161 +. + +Descamps 1957: 18 + +; + +Steyskal 1972: 8 + +. + + + + + + + + + +Diopsis cothurnata + +Bigot, 1874: 115 +. + + + + + + + + +Pseudodiopsis detrahens + +(Walker): + +Hennig 1965: 60 + +(with + +P. cothurnata + +as junior synonym). + +Steyskal 1977: 35 + +(with + +P. cothurnata + +as junior synonym). + + + + + + + +Pseudodiopsis cothurnata + +(Walker): + +Hendel, 1917: 33 + +. + +Curran 1934: 495 + +; + +Malloch 1938: 437 + +; + +Shillito 1940: 150 + +. + + + + + + + +Microdiopsis cothurnata + +(Walker): + +Curran, 1934: 359 + +. + +Curran 1934: 495 + +(in the corrections rectified to + +Pseudodiopsis cothurnata + +); + +Malloch 1938: 437 + +; + +Steyskal 1972: 12 + +. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala detrahens + +(Walker): + +Feijen 1989: 66 + +. + +Baker 1999: 24 + +, fig. 1-2; + +Meier and Baker 2002: 326 + +. + + + + + + + +Type series. + + + +Indonesia +: + +holotype + +“ +Fæm. +” + +(head and abdomen lost, Fig. +136 +), Makessar, Celebes, on label Macassar, Celebes, +A. R. Wallace +, ex coll. Saunders 684 [ +Makassar +, +Sulawesi +, Indonesia, ~ + +5°12'31"S +, +119°27'1"E + +, ~ + +5 m + +] ( + +NHMUK + +) + +. The type of + +D. cothurnata + +appears lost. Bigot only indicated +Célèbes +[ +Sulawesi +, +Indonesia +]. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala detrahens + +134 +Donggala, Sulawesi, Indonesia (photograph © Ariyo Prasetyo) +135 +♀, Dumoga, Sulawesi, habitus, dorsal view +136 +♀, holotype, Makassar, Sulawesi, dorsolateral view. Scale bar: 1 mm ( +135 +). + + + + + +Distribution. + + +Only Sulawesi can, at present, be considered as the area for + +S. detrahens + +. + +Sphyracephala + +specimens from countries as far apart as +Malaysia +, +Japan +, and the +Solomon Islands +have been identified as + +S. detrahens + +. However, at least part of these identifications appears doubtful and more study of genitalia or molecular studies are required. Although + +S. detrahens + +and + +S. cothurnata + +appear distinct synonyms, it is possible that at least on the small islands near Sulawesi an additional species occurs. + + + + +Illustrations. + + +A set of photographs (Figs +134 +– +141 +) of habitus, head, thorax, wing, fore femur, and abdomen is presented. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala detrahens + +, ♀, Dumoga, Sulawesi, Indonesia +137 +head, anterior view +138 +wing +139 +precoxal bridge of prosternum, ventral view +140 +fore femur, inner view +141 +abdomen, dorsal view. Scale bars: 0.5 mm ( +137, 138 +); 0.2 mm ( +139–141 +). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/75/C3/DA/75C3DA03D02F5A53857E8458E48EB3F6.xml b/data/75/C3/DA/75C3DA03D02F5A53857E8458E48EB3F6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b7d33e85ff2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/75/C3/DA/75C3DA03D02F5A53857E8458E48EB3F6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,470 @@ + + + +A revision of the four Afrotropical and Palaearctic Sphyracephala Say (Diptera, Diopsidae) with an illustrated overview of the other five Sphyracephala + + + +Author + +Feijen, Hans R. +0000-0002-7265-8448 +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands + + + +Author + +Feijen, Frida A. A. +0000-0001-5872-8780 +ETH Zürich, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Integrative Biology (IBZ), 8092 Zürich, Switzerland & EAWAG, Aquatic Ecology, Dübendorf, Switzerland + + + +Author + +Feijen, Cobi +0000-0001-8756-3903 +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2025 + +2025-06-10 + + +1241 + + +1 +81 + + + +journal article +310381 +10.3897/zookeys.1241.151490 +b61e1f46-07df-41f0-84ab-1d49e78b9253 +E0BA0012-F063-43B8-926B-8DD47010D489 + + + + + +Sphyracephala hearseiana +( +Westwood, 1845 +) + + + + + +Figs 102 +, +105 +, +106 +, +107 +, +108 +, +109 +, +110 +, +112 +, +125–127 +, +128–131 +, +132–133 +, +Tables 2 +, +3 +, +4 + + + + + + + +Diopsis hearseiana + +Westwood, 1845: 99 +. + + + + + + + + +Sphryracephala hearseiana + +(Westwood): + +Westwood 1848: 37 + +, pl. 18, fig. 3 (error for + +Sphyracephala hearseiana + +). + +Bigot 1892: 216 + +; + +Sen 1921: 33 + +. + + + + + + + +Diopsis hoarseiana + +Westwood: + +Macquart 1851: 270 + +, pl. 27, fig. 12. + + + + + + + +Zygocephala hearsejana + +(Wiedemann): + +Rondani 1875: 443 + +(error for + +Zygocephala hearseiana +(Westwood )), 1876: 184 + +(as + +Zygocephala hearseiana +(Wiedemann )) + +. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala hearseiana + +(Westwood): + +Loew 1873: 102 + +. + +Hennig 1941 a +: 61 + +; + +Kumar 1978 a +: 63 + +, + +1978 b +: 201 + +, + +1979 a +: 95 + +, + +1979 b +: 143 + +; 70; + +Feijen et al. 2017: 85 + +; + +Feijen and Feijen 2019: 40 + +. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala hearseyana + +(Westwood): + + +Osten +Sacken 1882: 235 + + +. + +Van der Wulp 1896: 172 + +; + +Brunetti 1907: 163 + +; + +Hennig 1958: 567 + +. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala hearseyiana + +(Westwood) (also as +hearseiyana +): + +Hennig 1941 b +: 5 + +. + + + + + + + +Sphracephala + +hearseyana + +(Westwood): + +Nayar and Tandon 1962 a +: 113 + +. + +Nayar and Tandon 1962 b +: 131 + +, + +1963: 1 + +; + +Singh et al. 1962: 79 + +. + + + + + + + + +Non + +Sphyracephala hearseiana + +: + +Bezzi 1922: 69 + +. African records are misidentifications for + +Sphyracephala beccarii +(Rondani) + +. + + + + + + +Type series. + + +India +: the type series appears lost. Westwood states “ captured by Colonel Hearsey in different months and various localities; some on window-panes in June, some on orange and citron leaves in gardens in July, and some in the middle of August on cucumber leaves ”. +Westwood (1848) +added “ Inhabits Neemuch [ +Madhya Pradesh +] and other parts of +India +”. + + + + +Distribution. + + +Some records are known for Islamabad and Punjab in +Pakistan +. Most records come from the western half of +India +from +Himachal Pradesh +to +Tamil Nadu +. As easternmost Indian locations a few records are found for +Chhattisgarh +, +Odisha +, and +West Bengal +. +Datta and Biswas (1985) +mention a record for Khushtia, in western +Bangladesh +. Two records are known from photographs of an + +S. hearseiana + +- like fly from Dan Chang and Ban Rai Districts in western +Thailand +(iNaturalist observations 110414296 and 112536071), but it remains to be seen whether these represent + +S. hearseiana + +or an undescribed species. + + + + +Illustrations. + + +Nayar and Tandon (1962 a +, +1962 b +, +1963 +) and +Singh et al. (1962) +provided drawings of wing, head, genitalia, and thorax, while +Kumar (1978 a +, +1978 b +, +1979 a +, +1979 b +) gave drawings of genitalia, head, and mouthparts. +Feijen and Feijen (2019) +gave photographs of habitus and head. Here, photographs (Figs +125 +– +131 +) of habitus, head, thorax, wing, fore femur, and abdomen are presented and drawings of male genitalia (Figs +132 +, +133 +). + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala hearseiana + +, ♀, +125, 126 +Tamil Nadu, India +127 +Madhya Pradesh +125 +habitus, dorsal view +126 +head, anterior view +127 +precoxal bridge of prosternum, ventral view. Scale bars: 1 mm ( +125 +); 0.5 mm ( +126 +); 0.2 mm ( +127 +). + + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala hearseiana + +, Tamil Nadu, India +128 +♀, wing +129 +♀, fore femur, inner view +130 +♀, fore femur, outer view +131 +♂, abdomen, dorsal view. Scale bars: 0.5 mm ( +131 +); 0.2 mm ( +128–130 +). + + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala hearseiana + +, Rajasthan, India +132 +epandrium, cerci, surstyli, posterior view +133 +surstylus, outer view. Scale bars: 0.1 mm. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/85/D6/99/85D699B7165C5DBC9B7DDA561E2AB675.xml b/data/85/D6/99/85D699B7165C5DBC9B7DDA561E2AB675.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d31ce77b96d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/85/D6/99/85D699B7165C5DBC9B7DDA561E2AB675.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1307 @@ + + + +A revision of the four Afrotropical and Palaearctic Sphyracephala Say (Diptera, Diopsidae) with an illustrated overview of the other five Sphyracephala + + + +Author + +Feijen, Hans R. +0000-0002-7265-8448 +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands + + + +Author + +Feijen, Frida A. A. +0000-0001-5872-8780 +ETH Zürich, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Integrative Biology (IBZ), 8092 Zürich, Switzerland & EAWAG, Aquatic Ecology, Dübendorf, Switzerland + + + +Author + +Feijen, Cobi +0000-0001-8756-3903 +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2025 + +2025-06-10 + + +1241 + + +1 +81 + + + +journal article +310381 +10.3897/zookeys.1241.151490 +b61e1f46-07df-41f0-84ab-1d49e78b9253 +E0BA0012-F063-43B8-926B-8DD47010D489 + + + + + +Sphyracephala munroi +Curran, 1928 + + + + + +Figs 1 +, +3 +, +54–56 +, +57–59 +, +60 +, +61–65 +, +66–71 +, +72–77 +, +105 +, +106 +, +107 +, +108 +, +109 +, +110–112 +, +Tables 2 +, +3 +, +4 + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala munroi + +Curran, 1928: 274 +. + +Séguy 1949: 75 + +, + +1955: 1124 + +; + +Collart 1954: 330 + +; + +Descamps 1957: 17 + +; + +van Bruggen 1961: 415 + +, figs 13, 14, 16; + +Lindner 1962: 18 + +; + +Trân 1975: 14 + +, fig. 22 b; + +Cogan and Shillito 1980: 584 + +; + +Arnaud and Owen 1981: 144 + +; + +Feijen 1989: 21 + +; + +Rossi 1990: 3 + +; + +Baker 1999: 15 + +, figs 1-2, 1-3, 1-7, 2-2, 2-3, table 2-1, App. A; + +Hariri et al. 1998: 255 + +, table 1; + +Baker and Wilkinson 2001 + +: figs 2, 3, table 1; + +Baker et al. 2001 + +: figs 1, 2, table 1; + +Meier and Baker 2002 + +: fig. 2; + +Camerik 2006: 140 + +, table 7; + +Voje and Hansen 2013 + +: figs 1, 2, tab 1; + +Husak et al. 2013 + +: fig. 2; + +Holstein 2015 + +: fig. 2 on page 159 (not identified as + +S. munroi + +); + +Feijen and Feijen 2021: 1540 + +, fig. 64.27. + + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala beccarii + +(Rondani): + +Séguy 1949: 75 + +. + +Collart 1954 + +; 329; + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala munroi + +, Austen in + +Brunetti, 1928: 273 + +. +Nomen nudum +. + + + + + + + +Type series. + + + +South Africa +: + +holotype + +, + +, Farm Stentor, Barberton, Transvaal [ +Mpumalanga province +, +Ehlanzeni District +, +Nkomazi Local Municipality +, + +25°33'6"S +, +31°22'42"E + +, + +390 m + +], + +7.vi.1925 + +, +H. K. Munro +( + +NMSA + +) + +. + + + + +Material studied. + + + +Kenya +: +5 ♀ +, +2 ♂ +, +Mt. Elgon +, E. side +Kaptega +r. [~ + +1°11'22"N +, +34°45'44"E + +, ~ + +2250 m + +], + +26.i.1975 + +, +T. Kronestedt +( + +NHRS + +) + +; + +Malawi +: +24 ♀ +, +37 ♂ +, +Nyika +, +Mondwe valley +[ + +10°24'S +, +33°50'E + +, + +1760 m + +], + +vii.1972 + +, +D. Munthali +( + +RMNH + +) + +; + +3 ♀ +, +Zomba +, near postoffice [ + +15°22'30"S +, +35°19'32"E + +, + +980 m + +], + +18.xi.1973 + +; +3 ♂ +, + +25.xi.1973 + +; +9 ♀ +13 ♂ +, + +27.x.1974 + +, all +H. R. Feijen +( + +RMNH + +) + +; + +1 ♂ +, +Zomba +, +Mlunguzi river +, [ + +15°22'30"S +, +35°19'18"E + +, + +1140 m + +], + +2.viii.1975 + +; +1 ♀ +, + +7.viii.1975 + +, all +H. R. Feijen +( + +RMNH + +) + +; + +1 ♂ +, +Mulanje +, +Likabula river +[ + +15°56'19"S +, +35°31'13"E + +, + +1045 m + +], + +5.viii.1974 + +, +H. R. Feijen +( + +RMNH + +) + +; + +2 ♀ +, +3 ♂ +, +Fort Lister +, along small river [ +Phalombe District +, + +15°49'58"S +, +35°40'23"E + +, + +1005 m + +], + +5.viii.1974 + +, +H. R. Feijen +( + +RMNH + +) + +; + +Tanzania +: +10 ♀ +, +19 ♂ +, +Marangu +[ + +3°16'35"S +, +37°31'11"E + +, + +1480 m + +], + +30.vi.1978 + +, +H. R. Feijen +( + +RMNH + +) + +; + +8 ♀ +, +13 ♂ +, +Arusha +[ + +3°22'15"S +, +36°41'48"E + +, + +1400 m + +], + +8.vii.1978 + +; +3 ♀ +, +2 ♂ +, + +3.viii.1978 + +; +242 ♀ +, +210 ♂ +, + +9.xi.1978 + +; +1 ♂ +, + +4.vii.1987 + +, all +H. R. Feijen +( + +RMNH + +) + +; + +10 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, +Arusha Centre +[ + +3°22'15"S +, +36°41'48"E + +, + +1400 m + +], + +8.viii.1978 + +, +H. R. Feijen +( + +RMNH + +) + +; + +1 ♂ +, +Arusha +, +Mnt Meru hotel +[~ + +3°21'59"S +, +36°42'14"E + +, + +1430 m + +], + +10.ii.1984 + +, +G. G. M. Schulten +( + +RMNH + +) + +; + +Uganda +: +1 ♀ +, +Bundibugyu distr. +, +River Kyemahizi +, + +0°40'12"N +, +30°02'06"E + +, + +920 m + +, + +19.3.2012 + +, +M. von Tschirnhaus +( + +FBUB + +) + +. In total +318 ♀ +and +307 ♂ +were examined, giving a balanced sex-ratio of +100 ♀ +: +97 ♂ +(see also Table +4 +). + + + + +Diagnosis. + + + +Sphyracephala munroi + +can be recognised by the following set of characters: head, thorax and abdomen blackish; overall covered with long setulae; brown band below arcuate groove, large brown spots on occiput; eye stalk stout (~ 0.7 × the widest sagittal eye diameter), comparatively long and straight for a + +Sphyracephala + +; very small eye span ( +2.5–2.7 mm +) in + +and + +(respectively ~ 61 % and ~ 67 % of body length); very low rate of dimorphism D = 0.33; rectangular basiliform prosternum; apical seta / scutellar spine ratio: ~ 6.1; scutellar spine / scutellum ratio: 0.44; very small, blackish scutellar spines ~ +0.13 mm +; transparent wings with brownish tinge; brown fore femur with apical third dark brown, inner side with dark brown longitudinal stripe on central third, incrassate ( +l / w +ratio: 3.63), with two rows of transparent slender spinous setae, inner row with ~ 2.8 setae, outer row with ~ 4.0 setae; tergite 1 with fine transverse ridges and deep circular groove; intersternite 1-2 mesally a small dark sclerite, laterally narrowly connected to main sternite 2; + +tergite 7 with 2 large, rectangular sclerites; + +sternite 7 forming two rectangular sclerites with posterior extensions; + +cerci elongate, +l / w +ratio: ~ 4.6; + +sternite 8 forming two large rectangular sclerites; no real sclerotised ring, but mesally a tiny structure with thin lateral extensions; surstyli articulate, ventromedially directed, parallel-sided, on medial side hollow, no microtrichia, outer side clothed in setulae, inner side with a comb of fine, small setulae. + +Sphyracephala munroi + +belongs to the + +S. brevicornis + +species group and comes closest to + +S. babadjanidesi + +. + + + + +Redescription. + + +The following redescription considers the original description by +Curran (1928) +, the table of differences between + +S. beccarii + +and + +S. munroi + +by +Collart (1954) +, and description and illustrations by +van Bruggen (1961 +: figs 13, 14, 16). + + +Measurements +. Body length + +4.2 mm +± +SE +0.0 (range 3.7–4.7, +n += 40), + +4.1 mm +± 0.0 (range 3.7–4.5, +n += 40), eye span + +2.5 mm +± 0.0 (range 2.2–3.0, +n += 40), + +2.7 mm +± 0.0 (range 2.2–3.2, +n += 40); wing length + +3.5 mm +± 0.0 (range 3.2–3.7, +n += 10), + +3.6 mm +± 0.1 (range 3.3–3.8, +n += 10); length of scutellar spine + +0.13 ± 0.00 (range 0.10–0.14, +n += 10), + +0.13 mm +± 0.00 (range 0.12–0.14, +n += 10). +Baker and Wilkinson (2001) +found + +mean body length +5.96 mm +, + +5.29 mm +, + +mean eye span +2.88 mm +, + +2.86 mm +. + + +Head +. Central head (Figs +54 +– +58 +) and stalks blackish brown with broad brown band below arcuate groove running from antenna to antenna, basal ventral sections of stalks brown, occiput yellowish brown with dark brown edges; head uniformly pruinose (Figs +57 +, +58 +) except for glossy ventral part of clypeus and glossy ventral edge of occiput, head quite setulose; arcuate groove not very distinct, narrow and blackish; frons with slight elevation below ocellar tubercle; face flat, no facial teeth, lateroventral corners rounded, facial sulcus absent, but ventral facial edges slightly turned upward medially; eye stalk stout, ~ 0.7 × the widest sagittal eye diameter; eye span very small in both female (61.3 % ± +SE +0.2 % of body length, +n += 40) and male (66.7 % ± +SE +0.5 % of body length, +n += 40); a dimorphic species with a very low rate of dimorphism D = 0.33 (Figs +60 +, +105 +, +106 +, Table +2 +); inner vertical seta long, close to +0.5 mm +, 1.5 × diameter of eye stalk; outer vertical seta long, close to +0.4 mm +, 1.1 × diameter of eye stalk (Figs +57 +, +58 +). +Curran (1928) +indicated long ocellar setae, but that must be an error. +Baker and Wilkinson (2001) +found eye span in female to be 48.3 % of body length and in male 54.1 %, whereas they found a rate of dimorphism of 0.18 which would indicate + +S. munroi + +as a monomorphic species. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala munroi + +, +54, 55 +live photographs +54 +Arusha N. P., Tanzania (photograph © Donyo Gabriel) +55 +Matema, Tanzania (photograph © Martin Grimm) +56 +♀, Arusha, Tanzania, habitus, dorsal view. Scale bar: 1 mm ( +56 +). + + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala munroi + +57 +♀, head, anterior view, Zomba, Malawi +58 +♂, head, anterior view, Arusha, Tanzania +59 +♀, wing, Arusha. Scale bars: 0.5 mm. + + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala munroi + +, eye span plotted against body length. + + + +Thorax +. Collar blackish, pruinose; scutum, scutellum and scutellar spines uniformly blackish, pruinose and quite setulose (Fig. +56 +) [ +Curran (1928) +described the scutellar spines as brown, but +Collart (1954) +and +van Bruggen (1961) +named the black spines a differential character]; pleura blackish, uniformly pruinose; posterior notopleural seta medium-sized; infra-alar seta long, 3 × the length of notopleural seta (Fig. +56 +); supra-alar carina distinct; basiliform prosternum (Fig. +1 +) large, rectangular, laterally close to propleuron but clearly distinct [ +Feijen (1989) +noted a precoxal bridge for + +S. munroi + +, but that is an error.]; scutal length / scutal width ratio: 0.87; scutellum trapezoid, strongly narrowing distally; scutellar spines very small, straight, slightly turned upward, diverging at angle of ~ 75 °; scutellar spine / scutellum ratio: 0.44 ± 0.01 ( +n += 20, see Table +3 +); scutellar spine / length of body ratio: 0.033 ± 0.001 ( +n += 20); apical seta / scutellar spine ratio: 6.10 ± 0.12 ( +n += 19); scutellar length / scutellar width (at base) ratio: 0.60 ± 0.01 ( +n += 20). + + +Wing +. Transparent with a faint brownish tinge, especially apically (Figs +56 +, +59 +); vein CuA + CuP from vein CuP onward extending under angle of 45 ° to halfway wing margin in straight line; vein M 4 continuing distal of crossvein dm-m to one third of distance to wing margin; cell cua narrow, basally acute, apically rounded (Fig. +59 +); crossvein h distinct; glabrous area only includes anterior half of cell bc. + + + +Legs +. + +Fore coxa and trochanter pale brown (Fig. +63 +), coxa densely pruinose on anteriorly directed side, setulose; fore femur (Figs +61–63 +) pale brown, apical third dark brown on inner and outer side, inner side with characteristic dark brown longitudinal stripe on central third (Fig. +61 +), outer side thinly pruinose, inner side with subapically a densely pruinose depression, thinly pruinose dorsally and on inner side, clothed in pale setulae; fore tibia and tarsus dark brown, thinly pruinose and with rows of blackish setulae; mid and hind legs pale brown, femora with dark brown apical third, tibiae and tarsi brown; fore femur incrassate (Table +2 +), +l / w +ratio: 3.63 ± +SE +0.06 in + +( +n += 10) and 3.63 ± +0.03 in + +n += 10); fore femur with two rows of rather transparent, slender spinous setae (almost setula-like and difficult to count, especially on inner side) on distal half with in + +6.0 ± +SE +0.4 setae ( +n += 12) and in + +with 7.2 ± 0.3 ( +n += 12), inner row with 2.8 ± 0.1 ( +n += 24) setae and outer row with 4.0 ± 0.1 setae ( +n += 24), two rows of tubercles on distal three-quarters (Fig. +63 +) with in + +46.5 ± 0.8 tubercles ( +n += 11) and in + +with 44.5 ± 0.6 ( +n += 11), inner row with 24.2 ± 0.3 ( +n += 23) tubercles and outer row with 21.3 ± 0.3 ( +n += 23) tubercles. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala munroi + +, ♀, +61, 62 +Marangu, Tanzania +63–65 +Arusha, Tanzania +61 +fore femur, inner view +62 +fore femur, outer view +63 +fore legs, lateral view +64 +abdomen, dorsal view +65 +abdomen, ventral view. Scale bars: 0.5 mm ( +64, 65 +); 0.2 mm ( +61–63 +). + + + +Curran’s (1928) +key separating + +S. beccarii + +from + +S. munroi + +by the “ Tibiæ and tarsi largely or wholly yellowish ” for the former and the tibiae and tarsi brown for the latter should be disregarded. +Collart (1954) +in his tabulated key indicated useful differential characters: for + +S. beccarii +“ Fémurs + +antérieurs: fortement grossis. Tibias postérieurs: noirs à l’extrémité seulement. ” and for + +S. munroi +“ Fémurs + +antérieurs: modérément épaissis. Tibias postérieurs: entièrement noirs. ” + + +Preabdomen +. Tergites (Fig. +64 +) blackish brown, very thinly pruinose, almost glossy, setulose, especially laterally; tergite 1 with fine transverse ridges and on the meson a large, deep, circular groove (Fig. +64 +); suture between tergites 1 and 2 visible; tergites 2–6 rectangular; sternites 1–6 brown, all covering the width of the abdomen, clothed in small white setulae, sternites 1 and 2 glossy, sternites 3–6 thinly pruinose; sternite 1 short and trapezoid (Figs +65 +, +70 +); intersternite 1-2 mesally a slender dark sclerite, laterally narrowly connected to main sternite 2; sternites 2–5 rectangular sclerites (Figs +65 +, +66 +); sternite 6 consisting of two long, elongate sclerites, posteriorly with less sclerotised, narrower extensions (Fig. +66 +). + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala munroi + +, ♀, +66, 68–70 +Arusha, Tanzania, +67, 71 +Zomba, Malawi +66 +postabdomen, ventral view +67 +tergite 8, 10 and cerci, dorsal view +68 +sclerotised ring +69 +subanal plate, ventral view +70 +sternite 1, intersternite 1-2 and sternite 2, ventral view +71 +spermathecae. Scale bars: 0.2 mm ( +66, 70 +); 0.1 mm ( +67, 69, 71 +); 0.05 mm ( +68 +). + + + +Female postabdomen +. Postabdomen long, narrow (Fig. +66 +); tergite 7 represented by two rectangular sclerites, well separated mesally; tergite 8 two rectangular, thinly pruinose, sclerites, separated on the meson; tergum 10 short, posteriorly rounded, thinly pruinose but laterally glabrous, one pair of apical setulae; cerci elongate, +l / w +ratio: ~ 4.6, clothed in microtrichia and setulae (Fig. +67 +); sternite 7 consisting of two rectangular, elongate sclerites with long, narrow posterior extension; spiracle +7 in +membrane; sternite 8 represented by two large rectangular sclerites, separated on the meson, almost taking up the width of the abdomen, posterolaterally more sclerotised (Fig. +3 +), clothed in microtrichia and 12 pairs of setulae; subanal plate (Fig. +69 +) pentagonal with rounded corners, apex with one pair of longer setulae, clothed in microtrichia and a few pairs of small setulae; spermathecae (Fig. +71 +) mushroom-shaped with medium-sized, bell-shaped, hollow, more sclerotised, striated, inner structure, no protuberances; no real sclerotised ring of ventral vagina, but mesally a tiny curved structure with thin lateral extensions with a very thin, transparent connection between posterior tips (Fig. +68 +). + + +Male postabdomen +. Syntergosternite 7 + 8 slender, on both sides extending on the venter, (Fig. +77 +), spiracles 7 connected to sclerite well before its apices; epandrium (Fig. +72 +) rounded, clothed in microtrichia and ~ 25 pairs of setulae; surstyli (Figs +73 +, +74 +) articulate, +l / w +ratio: ~ 2.8, ventromedially directed, almost parallel-sided, apically rounded, on medial side hollow (scoop-like), no microtrichia, outer side clothed in setulae on distal three-quarters (Fig. +73 +), inner side with a few larger setulae on distal half, a comb of fine, small setulae along central ridge of “ scoop ” (Fig. +74 +); surstyli interconnected via slender processus longi; cerci (Fig. +72 +) broadening towards apex, length / broadest width ratio: 1.6, clothed in microtrichia and ~ 20 setulae; phallapodeme (Fig. +76 +) with club-shaped anterior arm, apically rounded, anterior arm 1.5 × longer than posterior arm, lateral processes broad; phallus broad, short, male genital process hardly sticking out from apex; ejaculatory apodeme straight, slender, apically twice as broad as basally (Fig. +75 +), ejaculatory sac normal-sized. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala munroi + +, ♂, Zomba, Malawi +72 +epandrium, cerci, surstyli, posterior view +73 +surstylus, outer view +74 +surstylus, inner view +75 +ejaculatory apodeme + sac +76 +phallapodeme +77 +syntergosternite 7 + 8, posterior view. Scale bars: 0.1 mm. + + + + + +Biology. + + +Compared with + +S. beccarii + +, not much is known about the second Afrotropical species + +S. munroi + +. The large numbers of flies collected in +Arusha +, +Tanzania +, clearly show that + +S. munroi + +can also show gregarious behaviour. However, real clusters (see +Feijen et al. 2017 +) have not yet been reported. +Rossi (1990) +described + +Stigmatomyces beccarii + +( +Laboulbeniales +) from + +S. beccarii + +, while + +Stigmatomyces elongatus + +was described from + +S. munroi + +. Both new fungi were described from flies from +Malawi +. It is interesting to note that these + +Sphyracephala + +were parasitised by very different + +Stigmatomyces + +. +Hariri et al. 1998 +recorded the presence of bacteria Type A + +Wolbachia + +in + +S. munroi + +. + +Wolbachia + +can be associated with female-biased sex ratio distortion, but such a sex ratio has not been found in + +S. munroi + +(Table +4 +). +Feijen (1989) +reported on a + +S. munroi + +with the venter covered with closely packed mites. In the specimens examined, +3 ♀ +and +1 ♂ +from +9. xi. 1978 +, +Arusha +, had the venter covered with mites. +Camerik (2006) +described the mite + +Pediculaster kilimanjarensis + +(Acari: +Siteroptidae +) from + +S. munroi + +collected in +Tanzania +. + + + + +Distribution. + + +Angola +, D. R. +Congo +, +Eswatini +, +Kenya +, +Malawi +, +Mozambique +, +South Africa +, +Tanzania +, +Uganda +, +Zimbabwe +. It appears that + +S. munroi + +is confined to Eastern and Southern Africa. However, we have seen some records from West Africa, but those need confirmation. + +Sphyracephala munroi + +was, in general, only collected from higher altitudes of +900–2250 m +. Only the type locality in +South Africa +is from a lower altitude ( +390 m +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B5/7F/46/B57F46D85C065007902913690BF7674C.xml b/data/B5/7F/46/B57F46D85C065007902913690BF7674C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7cf181f4c32 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B5/7F/46/B57F46D85C065007902913690BF7674C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,358 @@ + + + +A revision of the four Afrotropical and Palaearctic Sphyracephala Say (Diptera, Diopsidae) with an illustrated overview of the other five Sphyracephala + + + +Author + +Feijen, Hans R. +0000-0002-7265-8448 +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands + + + +Author + +Feijen, Frida A. A. +0000-0001-5872-8780 +ETH Zürich, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Integrative Biology (IBZ), 8092 Zürich, Switzerland & EAWAG, Aquatic Ecology, Dübendorf, Switzerland + + + +Author + +Feijen, Cobi +0000-0001-8756-3903 +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2025 + +2025-06-10 + + +1241 + + +1 +81 + + + +journal article +310381 +10.3897/zookeys.1241.151490 +b61e1f46-07df-41f0-84ab-1d49e78b9253 +E0BA0012-F063-43B8-926B-8DD47010D489 + + + + + +Sphyracephala subbifasciata +Fitch, 1855 + + + + + +Figs 101 +, +105 +, +106 +, +107 +, +108 +, +109 +, +110 +, +112 +, +119–120 +, +121–124 +, +Tables 2 +, +3 +, +4 + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala subbifasciata + +Fitch, 1855: 774 +. + +Williston 1908: 314 + +( + +S. brevicornis + +figure is + +S. subbifasciata + +); + +Curran 1934: 358 + +( + +S. brevicornis + +figure is + +S. subbifasciata + +); + +Lavigne 1962: 5 + +(Lavigne - pers. comm. - later indicated that all data refer to + +S. subbifasciata + +, except for 1958 records); + +Cole 1969 + +: fig. 10; Barnes 1988: 110; + +Peterson 1987: 785 + +(fig. 61.1 represents + +S. subbifasciata + +); + +Feijen 1989: 84 + +, figs 41–68; + +Delfosse 2006: 32 + +( + +S. brevicornis + +figure is + +S. subbifasciata + +); + +Stoaks and Shaw 2011: 232 + +; + +Lonsdale 2013 + +: table 2, figs 90, 91 (phylogenetic analysis), Londsdale 2020: 6, figs 143–147, 160–168, 188–190, 407; + +Marshall 2017: 419 + +. + + + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala brevicornis +(Say) + +: +Loew 1873: 103 + +. Loew was the first author to ascertain + +S. subbifasciata + +as junior synonym of + +S. brevicornis + +. + +Feijen (1989) + +indicated that Loew based his study of + +S. subbifasciata + +on a pair of flies received from +Osten +Sacken as + +S. subbifasciata + +. However, this pair represented + +S. brevicornis + +. Till + +Feijen (1989) + +, all authors followed Loew’s view, while often reporting on a mixture of the two species, or one of the two species. + + + + + +Type series. + + + +USA +: + +lectotype + + +, north of +Ottawa +, +Illinois +, + +17.x.1854 + +, +swept from grass, at base of the bluffs of the Illinois river +[~ + +41°23'31"N +, +88°47'13"W + +, ~ + +150 m + +] ( + +USNM + +, see also +Feijen 1989: 84 +) + +. + + +Paralectotypes + +: +2 ♀ +, same data as lectotype ( + +USNM + +) + +. + + + + +Distribution. + + +Feijen (1989) +gave for distribution: South-Eastern +Canada +and Northern +U. S. A. +from Northern +Colorado +to New +England +. +Stoaks and Shaw (2011) +extended the known distribution +1200 km +westward till Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. + + + + +Illustrations. + + +Feijen (1989) +and +Lonsdale (2020) +provided drawings of external morphology and genitalia, while Lonsdale also presented some photographs. To this is added photographs (Figs +119 +– +124 +) of habitus, head, thorax, wing, fore femur, and abdomen. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala subbifasciata + +, Canada +119 +♀, Hull QC, habitus, lateral view +120 +♂, Hemmingford QC, head, anterior view. Scale bars: 1 mm ( +119 +); 0.5 mm ( +120 +). + + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala subbifasciata + +, Canada +121 +♀, Ottawa ON, wing +122 +♂, Hull QC, fore legs +123 +♂, Hull QC, fore femur, inner view +124 +♀, Hemmingford QC, abdomen, dorsal view. Scale bars: 0.5 mm ( +121, 122 +); 0.2 mm ( +123, 124 +). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23200301FD18EB3DF70D8FD80.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23200301FD18EB3DF70D8FD80.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6b447084560 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23200301FD18EB3DF70D8FD80.xml @@ -0,0 +1,246 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Lasioglossum +) +xanthopus +( +Kirby, 1802 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Melitta xanthopus +Kirby, 1802: 78 + + +, + +, + +. +Lectotype +: + +, +England +: Burham; designated by + +Ebmer (1988: 579) + +; BMNH. + + + +Published data. +Morawitz 1873: 162 +( +Dagestan Republic +); +Pesenko 1986: 126 +(Caucasus); +Chenikalova 2005: 26 +( +Stavropol +Territory). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Stavropol +Territory + +: +1 ♀ +, +Zimnyaya Stavka +, +Kuma River +, +12. +V +.1911, +Uvarov +; + + + +Krasnodar +Territory + +: +1 ♀ +, +Gelendzhik +, +1. +VIII +.1908, N. Vorobyev; + + +2 ♀ +, Anapa, Lysaya Gora, + +3. +V +.1918 + +, +Skorikov +; + + +1 ♀ +, +Slavyanskiy +, + +on + +Brassica campestris + + +, +26. +V +.1937, +Z. Koshur +; + + +1 ♀ +, idem, alfalfa field, +29. +V +.1937, +Z. Koshur +; + + +6 ♀ +, idem, + +on + +Anchusa officinalis + + +, 2, +3. +VI +.1937, +Z. Koshur +; + + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Tekipirkent +, +41°20′N +47°52′E +, +29. +VI +.2023, +MP +. + + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus, east to the Urals); Europe, North Africa, +Israel +, +Lebanon +, +Turkey +, Azerbaijan, +Armenia +, Georgia, +Iran +, +Pakistan +, Central Asia, +Mongolia +, Northwestern +China +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23201301ED18EB19A702DFBF7.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23201301ED18EB19A702DFBF7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a20b0194025 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23201301ED18EB19A702DFBF7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,174 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Lasioglossum +) +sexnotatum +( +Kirby, 1802 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Melitta sexnotata +Kirby, 1802: 82 + + +, + +, + +. +Lectotype +: + +, +England +: Barham; designated by + +Ebmer (1988: 583) + +; BMNH. + + + +Published data. +Dathe 1980: 211 +(Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic); +Chenikalova 2005: 26 +( +Stavropol +Territory). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Stavropol +Territory + +: +1 ♀ +, +Shpakovskoye +, +27. +V +.1989, SB + +; + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +1 ♂ +, +Primorskiy +, +Samur Forest +, +41°54′N +48°28′E +, 2- + +4.07.2018 + +, YA + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus, Crimea, European part); Europe, Crete, +Turkey +, +Azerbaijan +, +Armenia +, +Georgia +, +Turkmenistan +, +Iran +. + + + + +Remarks. +A common species in Europe, but an uncommon in the North Caucasus. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23201301ED18EB3DF75DAFD5C.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23201301ED18EB3DF75DAFD5C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..789db6c873d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23201301ED18EB3DF75DAFD5C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,238 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Lasioglossum +) +quadrinotatum +( +Kirby, 1802 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Melitta quadrinotata +Kirby, 1802: 79 + + +, + +, + +. +Lectotype +: + +, +England +: Barham; designated by + +Ebmer (1988: 586) + +; BMNH. + + + +Published data. +Dathe 1980: 211 +(Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic); +Pesenko 1986: 124 +(Caucasus). + + + + +Material examined +[material of females is complex of + +L +. +quadrinotatum + + ++ +L. haesitans + +, see remarks for + +L +. +haesitans + +]. + +RUSSIA +. + +Stavropol +Territory + +: +1 ♂ +, near +Stavropol +, +11.VII.1927 +, Belizin; + + +5 ♀ +, Kislovodsk, on + +Taraxacum + +, + +15. +V +.1949 + +, VP; + + + +Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, Teberda Reserve, Dzhamagat Gorge, + +23. +VI +.1982 + +, E. Narchuk; + + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, Khunzakh, + +29. +V +.1960 + +, Tanasiychuk; + + +1 ♂ +, Shalbuzdag Mts, +27.VII.1983 +, I. Kerzhner; + + +2 ♀ +, Dubki, +43°01′N +46°56′E +, + +28. +V +.2019 + +, +MP +, +VL +. + + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus, east to the Urals); Europe, +Turkey +, +Azerbaijan +, +Armenia +, +Georgia +, +Iran +, +Kazakhstan +. + + + + +Remarks. +Distribution in south-eastern part of ranges is unclear because of misidentification with + +L. haesitans + +(see +Ebmer 2014: 347 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23201301ED18EB7347120F9C2.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23201301ED18EB7347120F9C2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9e0e0b2cc09 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23201301ED18EB7347120F9C2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Lasioglossum +) +subfasciatum +( +Imhoff, 1832 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Hylaeus subfasciatus +Imhoff, 1832: 1199 + + +, + +. +Syntype +(s): + +, [ +Switzerland +: Basel]; lost (see + +Warncke 1973: 285 + +). + + + +Published data. +This species was recorded by +Pesenko (1986) +from the south of the European part of the USSR and the Caucasus without exact locations. The record of the species from +Stavropol +Territory by +Chenikalova (2005) +needs to be verified. Since no specimens of this rare species were found in the ZISP collection directly from the territory of +Russia +, the species was excluded from the fauna of +Russia +( +Astafurova & Proshchalykin 2017b +) and later not included in the list of +Halictidae +of the “Annotated Catalogue of the +Hymenoptera +of +Russia +” ( +Astafurova & Proshchalykin 2017a +; + +Proshchalykin +et al +. 2023 + +). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Dagestan Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, Tsudakhar, +42°19′N +47°09′E +, +9. +V +.2022, AF. + + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus); Central and Southern Europe, Near East, +Turkey +, Caucasus, +Iran +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23202301AD18EB63B704AFE29.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23202301AD18EB63B704AFE29.xml index 128a300d445..b954ec02d27 100644 --- a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23202301AD18EB63B704AFE29.xml +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23202301AD18EB63B704AFE29.xml @@ -1,53 +1,54 @@ - - - -Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region - - -Author + + +Author -Astafurova, Yulia V. -Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. - - -Author + + +Author -Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. -Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2025 - -2025-05-22 + +2025 + +2025-05-22 - -5637 + +5637 - -3 + +3 - -515 -558 + +515 +558 - -https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 -1175-5326 -4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 - + @@ -86,7 +87,7 @@ , Germany : Bamberg; designated by - + Astafurova & Proshchalykin (2018: 18) ; ZISP. @@ -109,7 +110,7 @@ Territories). Material examined. - + RUSSIA . @@ -131,7 +132,9 @@ on 5.VII.1938 -, VR; +, VR; + + 1 ♀ , idem @@ -144,7 +147,9 @@ on 16.VIII.1938 -, VR; +, VR; + + 7 ♀ , idem, @@ -158,7 +163,9 @@ on VII.1974 -, VT; +, VT; + + 2 ♀ , 6 ♂ @@ -168,25 +175,33 @@ on , V -. Tryapitzin; +. Tryapitzin; + + 5 ♀ , idem, 18.IV.1975 -, VT; +, VT; + + 5 ♀ , idem, 27. IV.1976 -, VT; +, VT; + + 3 ♀ , idem, 12.VII.1979 -, Storozheva; +, Storozheva; + + 1 ♀ , 3 ♂ @@ -196,13 +211,17 @@ on , V -. Tryapitzin; +. Tryapitzin; + + 2 ♂ , idem, 10.X.1990 -, VT; +, VT; + + 57 ♀ , 6 ♂ @@ -210,11 +229,11 @@ on 15 VII–5.IX.1952 -, VR; -1 ♀ +, VR; + +1 ♀ , - Krasnodar , @@ -234,7 +253,9 @@ on , K. Tomkovich -; +; + + 6 ♀ , 1 ♂ @@ -246,7 +267,9 @@ on 12.VIII.2010 -, NV; +, NV; + + 4 ♀ , 2 ♂ @@ -263,7 +286,9 @@ distr, , YA -; +; + + 2 ♀ , 3 ♂ @@ -275,7 +300,9 @@ distr, , YA -; +; + + 2 ♀ , Sochi, @@ -284,7 +311,7 @@ distr, , AF ; - + Stavropol Territory @@ -305,7 +332,9 @@ NW of , O. Kovalev -; +; + + 68 ♀ , 3 ♂ @@ -340,7 +369,7 @@ W of , YP ; - + Adygei Republic @@ -358,7 +387,9 @@ W of , K. Tomkovich -; +; + + 19 ♀ , Nikel @@ -370,7 +401,9 @@ W of , S. Basov -; +; + + 5 ♀ , Shuntuk @@ -387,7 +420,9 @@ on 21.V.1938 -; +; + + 15 ♀ , idem, @@ -398,13 +433,17 @@ on , 23, 24. V1938 -; +; + + 5 ♀ , idem, 25.VII.1938 -, Andreeva; +, Andreeva; + + 8 ♀ , @@ -442,7 +481,7 @@ N of Baksan , YP ; - + Dagestan Republic @@ -456,7 +495,9 @@ N of Baksan 10.V.1988 -, Guseynzade; +, Guseynzade; + + 1 ♀ , near Kufa, @@ -480,7 +521,9 @@ NW of Rutul VL , MM -; +; + + 8 ♀ , 5 ♂ @@ -500,7 +543,9 @@ SW of Magaramkent YA , KF -; +; + + 1 ♀ , Khotoch, 42°24′N diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23203301CD18EB1737659FA28.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23203301CD18EB1737659FA28.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ba5a38b600f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23203301CD18EB1737659FA28.xml @@ -0,0 +1,552 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Leuchalictus +) +leucozonium +( +Schrank, 1781 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Apis leucozonia +Schrank, 1781: 406 + + +, + +. +Syntype +(s): +Austria +: +Wien +; lost (see + +Warncke 1973: 24 + +; + +Ebmer 1974: 117 + +). + + + +Published data. +Pesenko 1986: 143 +(Caucasus); +Chenikalova 2005: 27 +( +Stavropol +Territory). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Krasnodar +Territory + +: +3 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, +Sochi +, + +24.X.1926 + +, +A. Shestakov +; + + +2 ♀ +, Slavyanskiy, + +on + +Cichorium intybus + + +, 12, + +20.VII.1938 + +, VR; + + +28 ♀ +, Lazarevskoye, + +4-18.VIII.1952 + +, VR; + + +2 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, +20 km +NE of +Krasnodar +, + +10.VII.1990 + +, YP; + + +3 ♀ +, + + +20 km + +WSW of Pavlovskaya + +, Chelbas River, meadow, + +11.VIII.1990 + +, YP; + + +1 ♂ +, + + +8 km + +NW of Temryuk + +, Golubitzkaya, + +17.IX.2007 + +, +A. Khalaim + +; + + +Stavropol +Territory + +: +1 ♀ +, +Shpakovskoye +, + + +27. +V +.1988 + + +, +SB +; + + +2 ♂ +, idem, + +27.VIII.1989 + +, +SB +; + + +4 ♂ +, + +15 km +W of +Stavropol + +, + +600 m + +, steppe, + +5.VIII.1990 + +, YP + +; + + + +Adygei Republic + + +: +1 ♂ +, + +55 km +S of Maykop + +, +Belaya River +, + +550 m + +, meadow, forest, + +7.VIII.1990 + +, YP + +; + + + +Kabardino-Balkarian Republic + + +: +2 ♂ +, + +5 km +N of Baksan + +, + +500 m + +, steppe, + +31.VII. 1990 + +, YP + +; + + + +North Ossetian Republic + + +: +1 ♀ +, + +20 km +S of Buran + +, + +1850 m + +, steppe slope, + +28.VII.1990 + +, YP + +; + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Manaskent +, + +30 km +SE of Makhachkala + +, steppe slope, + +21.VII.1990 + +, YP; + + +5 ♀ +, +Kochubey +, +44.398°N +, +46.541°E +, + +on + +Convolvulus arvensis + + +, + + +19. +VI +.2018 + + +, +YA +; + + +1 ♀ +, near +Barkhan Sarykum +, +43°01′N +43°23′E +, + + +23. +VI +.2018 + + +, +YA +; + + +4 ♀ +, near +Kufa +, +6 km +NW of +Rutul +, + +1500 m + +, 41°565′N 47°362′E, + +1.VII.2018 + +, +KF +; + + +3 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, +Primorskiy +, +Samur Forest +, +41°54′N +48°28′E +, + +2-4.VII.2018 + +, +YA +; + + +1 ♀ +, +Khlyut +, +41.30°N +, +47.11°E +, + + +4. +VI +.2019 + + +, +MP +, +VL +; + + +1 ♀ +, +Tsudakhar +, +42°20′N +47°10′E +, + + +24. +VI +.2023 + + +, +MP +; + + +2 ♀ +, + +13 km +NE of Kochybey + +, +43.442°N +, +46.691°E +, + + +18. +VI +.2018 + + +, +MP +, +VL +, +MM +.. + + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus, east to the Far East); Europe, North Africa, Near East, +Turkey +, Caucasus, +Iran +, +Afghanistan +, +Pakistan +, North +India +, Central Asia, +Mongolia +, NW +China +, North America. + + + + +Remarks. +The females of this species show significant variability in coloration of pubescence (from snow-white to yellowish), sculpture of T1 (from tessellate and dull with dense punctures to polished and smooth with sparse punctures) and density punctures of the mesoscutum. +Pesenko (2006: 154) +synonymized + +L. tadschicum +(Blüthgen, 1929) + +with + +L. leucozonium +. + +Forma “ + +L. tadschicum + +” differs from the typical form by white pubescence of the head and mesosoma (greyish yellow in typical form) and sparser punctation of the mesoscutum and T +1 in +the female. + + +This species occurs in forest, steppe and agricultural landscapes, but forma “ + +L. tadschicum + +” usually occurs in desert and semi-desert plane areas. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232043018D18EB67877C7FDE1.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232043018D18EB67877C7FDE1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..830f90e4e83 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232043018D18EB67877C7FDE1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,768 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Sphecodogastra +) +calceatum +( +Scopoli, 1763 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Apis calceata +Scopoli, 1763: 301 + + +, + +. +Neotype +: + +, +Austria +: Zell Pfarre ( +Carinthia +); designated by + +Ebmer (1974: 113) + +; ZSM. + + + +Published data. +Morawitz 1873: 166 +( +Dagestan Republic +, as + +Halictus cylindricus +Fabricius + +); +Mamayeva & Krasnova 1971: 45 +( +Krasnodar +Territory); +Dathe 1980: 210 +(Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic); +Chenikalova 2005: 26 +( +Stavropol +Territory). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Krasnodar +Territory + +: +5 ♀ +, +Krasnaya Polyana +, + +1.VII.1909 + +, A. +Yakovlev + +; + +1 ♀ +, +Slavyanskiy +, + +on + +Heliauthus annuus + + +, + +5.VII.1938 + +, VR + +; + +1 ♀ +, idem, + +on + +Cichorium intybus + + +, + +2.VIII.1938 + +, VR + +; + +6 ♀ +, +Lazarevskoye +, + +on + +Cichorium intybus + + +, + +9.VIII.1952 + +, VR + +; + +21 ♂ +, idem, + +6.IX.1952 + + +; + +1 ♀ +, +13 ♂ +, + +20 km +WSW of Pavlovskaya + +, +Chelbas River +, meadow, + +11.VIII.1990 + +, YP + +; + +1 ♀ +, +Velikovechnoue +, +Belaya River +, + +12.VIII.2010 + +, NV + +; + +1 ♀ +, +Goryachiy Kluch +distr, +Suzdalskaya +, +44°45′N +39°22′E +, + +6-14.VIII.2011 + +, +YA + +; + + +Stavropol +Territory + +: +1 ♀ +, +7 ♂ +, +Kislovodsk +, + +27.XI–11.X.1947 + +, VP + +; + +17 ♀ +, idem, + +24.IV–10. +V + +.1949, VP + +; + +10 ♀ +, idem, meadow, forest, + +25.IV.2018 + +, +SB + +; + +5 ♀ +, idem, +Lermontov Rock +, meadow, forest, + +29.IV.2018 + +, +SB + +; + +1 ♂ +, +Vysotskoye +, +Petrovsk distr. +, + +12.VIII.1987 + +, +Drapolyuk + +; + +1 ♂ +, +Shpakovskoye +, + +27.VII.1989 + +, +SB + +; + +1 ♀ +, +15 km +W of +Stavropol +, + +600 m + +, steppe, + +5.VIII.1990 + +, YP + +; + +1 ♀ +, +Pshady +, + +2-4.VIII.2006 + +, +K. Tomkovich + +; + + +Adygei Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Maykop +, + +V + +.1902, G. Shaposhnikov + +; + +1 ♀ +, +2 ♂ +, +Shuntuk +, +Maykop +, + +25.VII.1938 + +, +Andreeva + +; + +1 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, + +55 km +S of Maykop + +, +Belaya River +, + +550 m + +, meadow, forest, + +7.VIII.1990 + +, YP + +; + + +Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic + +: +2 ♀ +, +Teberda Nature Reserve +, + +29.VII–6.VIII.1988 + +, +D. Scherbakov + +; + +4 ♀ +, +10 km +SW of +Uchkeken +, meadow, + +1.VIII.1990 + +, YP + +; + +21 ♀ +, +11 ♂ +, + +10 km +E of Karachayevsk + +, +Mara River +, + +1050 m + +, forest, meadow, steppe slope, + +2.VIII.1990 + +, YP + +; + +2 ♀ +, +2 ♂ +, +7 km +N of +Rozhkao +, +43°53′N +40°56′E +, + +4.VIII.2019 + +, AF + +; + + +Ingush Republic + +: +5 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, +Salgi +, + +29.VII.1927 + +, +Kirichenko + +; + +5 ♂ +, idem, + +31.VII–9.VIII,1927 + + +; + + +Kabardino-Balkarian Republic + +: +19 ♀ +, +8 ♂ +, + +5 km +N of Baksan + +, + +500 m + +, steppe, + +31.VII. 1990 + +, YP + +; + + +North Ossetian Republic + +: +6 ♀ +, +Ardon +, +Vladikavkaz +, + +28.IV.1900 + +, +Demokidov + +; + +1 ♀ +, +Gizel +, + +10 km +W of Vladikavkaz + +, + +550 m + +, steppe, + +25.VII.1990 + +, YP + +; + +1 ♀ +, +20 km +S of +Buran +, + +1850 m + +, steppe slope, + +28.VII.1990 + +, YP + +; + + +Chechen Republic + +: +19 ♀ +, +Borzoy +, + +10 km +SW of Shatoy + +, + +900 m + +, meadow, + +23.VII.1990 + +, YP + +; + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +3 ♀ +, + +13-26 km +NE of Kochubey + +, + +18. +VI + +.2018, +YA + +; + +1 ♀ +, + +22 km + +SW of +Terekli-Mekteb +, +44°04′N +45°64′E +, + +21.VI + +.2018, +MP +, +VL +, +MM + +; + +1 ♀ +, + +20 km +W of Makhachkala + +, +Barkhan Sarykum +, +43°00′N +47°14′E +, 23, + +24. +VI + +.2018, +MP +, +VL +, +MM + +; + +1 ♀ +, +Primorskiy +, +Samur Forest +, +41°54′N +48°28′E +, + +2- 4.VII.2018 + +, +YA + +; + +2 ♀ +, +Samur Reserve +, 41°866′N 48°556′E, + +3.VII.2018 + +, +MP +, +VL +, +MM +, +YA + +; + +1 ♀ +, +Tsudakhar +, +42°20′N +47°10′E +, 15, + +18. +VI + +.2023, +MP + +; + +1 ♀ +, +Tekipirkent +, +41°20′N +47°52′E +, + +29. +VI + +.2023, +MP + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus, east to Kuril Islands); Europe, North Africa, +Turkey +, Caucasus, +Iran +, Central Asia, +Mongolia +, North +China +, +Korea +, +Japan +. + + + + +Remarks. +This common species occurs in various landscapes. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23204301BD18EB3DF70C0FC84.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23204301BD18EB3DF70C0FC84.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d7c3cf56138 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23204301BD18EB3DF70C0FC84.xml @@ -0,0 +1,349 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Sphecodogastra +) +albipes +( +Fabricius, 1781 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Apis albipes +Fabricius, 1781: 486 + + +, + +. +Lectotype +: + +, +Italy +: no locality; designated by + +Warncke (1973: 23) + +; NHMD. + + + +Published data. +Mamayeva & Krasnova 1971: 44 +( +Krasnodar +Territory); +Dathe 1980: 210 +(Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic); +Chenikalova 2005: 26 +( +Stavropol +Territory). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Krasnodar +Territory + +: +4 ♀ +, Gelendzhik, +7.VII.1908 +, N. Vorobyev; + + +14 ♀ +, Lazarevskoye, on + +Campanula +spp. + +and + +Cichorium intybus + +, +25-27.VII.1952 +, VR; + + +2 ♀ +, idem, + +24. +V +.1973 + +, VT; + + +1 ♀ +, Psebay, + +21. +V +.1991 + +, Volnukhin; + + + +Stavropol +Territory + +: +1 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, +15 km +W of +Stavropol +, +600 m +, steppe, +5.VIII.1990 +, YP; + + +2 ♀ +, Kislovodsk, meadow, forest, 25.IV, + +1. +V +.2018 + +, +SB +; + + + +Adygei Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +47 km +S of Khadzokh, Guzeripl, + +26. +VI +.1976 + +, ES; + + + +Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic + +: +1 ♂ +, Teberda Nature Reserve, Dzhamagat River valley, +1200 m +, +14.VIII.1980 +, Tanasiychuk; + + +1 ♀ +, idem, +29.VII–6.VIII.1988 +, D. Scherbakov; + + +2 ♀ +, Teberda, + +24. +VI +.1982 + +, E. Narchuk; + + + +Ingush Republic + +: +1 ♂ +, Salgi, +29.VII.1927 +, Kirichenko; + + +1 ♀ +, Egochkal near Dzheyrakh, +7.VIII.1927 +, Kirichenko; + + + +Chechen Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, Borzoy, +10 km +SW of Shatoy, +900 m +, meadow, +23.VII.1990 +, YP; + + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +3 ♀ +, Tsudakhar, +42°20′N +47°10′E +, 15, + +18. +VI +.2023 + +, +MP +; + + +3 ♀ +, valley of Kurush River, +41°15′N +47°49′E +, + +26. +VI +.2023 + +, +MP +; + + +3 ♀ +, Tekipirkent, +41°20′N +47°52′E +, + +29. +VI +.2023 + +, +MP +. + + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus, east to Siberia [nominate subspecies]; Far East [ + +ssp. +villosum +Ebmer, 1995 + +]); Europe, North Africa, +Turkey +, +Azerbaijan +, Georgia, +Iran +, Central Asia, +Mongolia +, North +China +, +Korea +, +Japan +. + + + + +Remarks. +In the North Caucasus, this species occurs in steppe and forest landscapes. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23205301AD18EB781777BF873.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23205301AD18EB781777BF873.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..eee33a666a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23205301AD18EB781777BF873.xml @@ -0,0 +1,504 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Pyghalictus +) +politum +( +Schenck, 1853 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Hylaeus politus +Schenck, 1853: 163 + + +, + +. +Lectotype +: + +, +Germany +: Wiesbaden; designated by + +Ebmer (1975: 238) + +; SGNF. + + + +Published data. +Morawitz 1873: 167 +( +Dagestan Republic +); +Chenikalova 2005: 26 +( +Stavropol +Territory). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Krasnodar +Territory + +: +66 ♀ +, +5 ♂ +, +Lazarevskoye +, + +25-29.VII.1952 + +, VR; + + +7 ♀ +, idem, + +18.IV.1975 + +, VT; + + +2 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, idem, + +8.VII.1975 + +, +Tryapitzin +; + + +3 ♀ +, idem, + +10.X.1980 + +, VT; +1 ♀ +, +Goryachiy Kluch +distr, +Suzdalskaya +, +44°45′N +39°22′E +, + +6.VIII.2011 + +, YA + +; + + +Stavropol +Territory + +: +1 ♂ +, + +16 km +NW of +Stavropol + +, +Pelagiada +, + +29.VII.1981 + +, O. +Kovalev +; + + +16 ♀ +, +Shpakovskoye +, 27. +V +, 27.VII, + +1-5.VIII.1989 + +, SB; + + +13 ♀ +, +Kislovodsk +, +Lermontov Rock +, meadow, forest, + +29.IV.2018 + +, SB + +; + + +Adygei Republic + +: +4 ♀ +, +Shuntuk +, +Maykop +, + +23.V.1938 + +, +Andreeva +; + + +4 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, idem, + +25.VII.1938 + +, +Andreeva +; + + +27 ♀ +, +5 ♂ +, idem, + +15.VII.1935 + +, +Petrukhina +; + + +11 ♀ +, + +47 km +S of Khadzokh + +, Guzeripl, + +26.VI.1976 + +, ES; + + +2 ♀ +, +Dakhovskaya +, +44.199°N +, +40.170°E +, + +19-24.VIII.2009 + +, +K. Tomkovich + +; + + +Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic + +: +1 ♂ +, +Teberda +, +Dzhamagat +gorge, + +9.VIII.1953 + +, +E.Arens + +; + + +North Ossetian Republic + +: +9 ♀ +, +Ardon +, +Vladikavkaz +, + +28.IV.1900 + +, +Demokidov + +; + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, +Samur Reserve +, 41°86′N +48°55′E +, + + +2. +VI +.2017 + + +, +MM +; + + +1 ♀ +, +Primorskiy +, +Samur Forest +, +41°54′N +48°28′E +, + +2-4.VII.2018 + +, YA; + + +3 ♀ +, idem, + + +27. +V +.2023 + + +, +S. Basov +; + + +2 ♀ +, + +5 km +SSW of Rubas + +, +41°52′N +48°16′E +, + + +2. +VI +.2019 + + +, +MP +, +VL +; + + +2 ♀ +, +Maydanskoye +, +42°36′07″N +, +46°58′13″E +, + +19.VII.2023 + +, +MP +; + + +3 ♀ +, +Tsudakhar +, +42°20′N +47°10′E +, 15, + + +18. +VI +.2023 + + +, +MP +; + + +1 ♀ +, +Arakani +, +42°36′N +46°59′E +, + + +22. +VI +.2023 + + +, +MP + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus, east to the Urals); Europe (except north) [nominate subspecies]; North Africa, Near East, +Turkey +, +Azerbaijan +, +Georgia Uzbekistan +, +Tajikistan +, +Kyrgyzstan +, +Iran +[ + +ssp. +atomarium +( +Morawitz, 1876 +) + +]; Eastern +China +, +Japan +[ + +ssp. +pekingense +( +Blüthgen, 1925 +) + +]. + + + + +Remarks. +A common species in forest and steppe areas. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232063019D18EB10E75B4FBA4.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232063019D18EB10E75B4FBA4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8d9325ac758 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232063019D18EB10E75B4FBA4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,394 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Sphecodogastra +) +interruptum +( +Panzer, 1798 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Hylaeus interruptus +Panzer, 1798: 4 + + +, + +. +Syntype +(s): + +, +Austria +: no locality; lost. + + + +Published data. +Chenikalova 2005: 26 +( +Stavropol +Territory). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Krasnodar +Territory + +: +1 ♀ +, near +Anapa +, + + +15. +V +.1998 + + +, +A. Skorikov +; +1 ♀ +, +Ashe +, +Sochi distr. +, + +6.III.1966 + +, O. Kryzhanovskiy + +; + + +Stavropol +Territory + +: +6 ♀ +, +2 ♂ +, +Shpakovskoye +, + +27.VII.1989 + +, +SB + +; + +1 ♀ +, +3 ♂ +, +15 km +W of +Stavropol +, + +600 m + +, steppe, + +5.VIII.1990 + +, YP; + + +1 ♂ +, +Novozavedennoye +, near +Kuma River +, + + +3. +VI +.2010 + + +, NV + +; + + +Adygei Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Shuntuk +, +Maykop +, + +on + +Allium sativa + + +, + + +21. +V +.1938 + + +, Andreeva + +; + + +Kabardino-Balkarian Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Nalchik +, coll. +A. Yakovlev +; +7 ♀ +, +11 ♂ +, + +5 km +N of Baksan + +, + +500 m + +, steppe, + +31.VII.1990 + +, YP + +; + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Tabasaran distr. +, +NW of Maraga +, 41°975′N 48°094′E, + + +2. +V +.2019 + + +, +MM + +; + +1 ♀ +, +2 km +NW of +Talgi +, +42°19′N +47°09′E +, + + +25. +VI +.2018 + + +, +KF + +; + +2 ♀ +, idem, + +29.05.2019 + +, +MP +, +VL + +; + +1 ♀ +, near +Gubden +, +42°34′N +47°33′E +, + + +2. +VI +.2022 + + + +, + +AF; +5 ♀ +, +Tsudakhar +, +42°19′N +47°09′E +, + + +15. +VI +.2023 + + +, +MP + +; + +2 ♀ +, +Arakani +, +42°36′N +46°59′E +, + + +22. +VI +.2023 + + +, +MP + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus, Crimea, European part); Europe, North Africa, +Lebanon +, +Azerbaijan +[nominate subspecies]; +Romania +, +Syria +, +Turkey +, +Armenia +, +Iran +[ + +ssp. +trispinosus +(Alfken, 1907) + +]. + + + + +Remarks. +In steppe areas. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232073019D18EB54F70C3FE29.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232073019D18EB54F70C3FE29.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..110a38c407c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232073019D18EB54F70C3FE29.xml @@ -0,0 +1,494 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Sphecodogastra +) +fulvicorne +( +Kirby, 1802 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Melitta fulvicornis +Kirby, 1802: 67 + + +, + +. +Lectotype +: + +, +England +: [no locality]; designated by + +Ebmer (1988: 606) + +; BMNH. + + + +Published data. +Morawitz 1873: 167 +( +Dagestan Republic +); +Mamayeva & Krasnova 1971: 45 +( +Krasnodar +Territory); +Dathe 1980: 211 +( +Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic +) + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Krasnodar +Territory + +: +1 ♀ +, +Krasnaya Polyana +, +6. +VII +.1978, +V +. +Rikhter +; + + +1 ♀ +, +7 ♂ +, +Lazarevskoye +, + +4VIII–5.IX.1952 + +, VR; + + +2 ♀ +, idem + +18.IV.1957 + +, VT; + + +1 ♂ +, idem, +22. +VI +.1979, +Storozheva +; + + + +Stavropol +Territory + +: +1 ♀ +, +Kislovodsk +, 24.IV, +15. +V +.1949,VP; + + +11 ♀ +, idem, meadow, forest, +29.IV–3. +V +.2018, SB; + + + +Adygei Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Shuntuk +, +Maykop +, +23. +III +.1934, +K. Petrukhina +; + + +5 ♀ +, + +47 km +S of Khadzokh + +, +Guzeripl +, +26. +VI +.1976, ES; + + +1 ♂ +, + +55 km +S of Maykop + +, +Belaya River +, + +550 m + +, meadow, forest, +7. +VIII +.1990, YP; + + + +Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic + +: +2 ♀ +, +Teberda +, +24. +VI +.1982, +E. Narchuk +; + + +1 ♀ +, +Dombay +, +9. +VII +.1982, E. +Narchuk +; + + +1 ♀ +, + +10 km +SW of Uchkeken + +, meadow, +1. +VIII +.1990,YP; + + +1 ♂ +, + +10 km +E of Karachayevsk + +, +Mara River +, + +1050 m + +, forest, meadow, steppe slope, +2. +VIII +.1990, YP; + + +1 ♂ +, +7 km +N of +Rozhkao +, +43°53′N +40°56′E +, +4. +VIII +.2019, AF; + + + +Ingush Republic + +: +6 ♂ +, +Salgi +, +29. +VII +.1927, +Kirichenko +; + +North Ossetian Republic + +: +14 ♀ +, +Ardon +, +Vladikavkaz +, + +28.IV.1900 + +, +Demokidov +; + + +1 ♂ +, +Gizel +, + +10 km +W of Vladikavkaz + +, + +550 m + +, steppe area, +25. +VII +.1990, YP; + + +2 ♀ +, +2 ♂ +, +20 km +S of +Buran +, + +1850 m + +, steppe slope, +26-28. +VII +.1990, YP; + + + +Chechen Republic + +: +2 ♀ +, +Borzoy +, + +10 km +SW of Shatoy + +, + +900 m + +, meadow, +23. +VII +.1990, YP; + + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +1 ♂ +, + +30 km +NW of Rutul + +, +22. +VII +.1983, +E. Narchuk +; + + +1 ♂ +, +Shara +, +42°07′N +47°08′E +, +22. +VI +.2021, AF; + + +1 ♀ +, +Tekipirkent +, +41°20′N +47°52′E +, +29. +VI +.2023, +MP + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus. east to +Altai +[nominate subspecies], from +Altai +to Far East [ + +ssp. +melanocorne +Ebmer, 1988 + +]); Europe, +Turkey +, Azerbaijan, +Armenia +, Georgia, +Turkmenistan +[nominate subspecies]; NE +Turkey +, +Iran +[ + +ssp. +antelicum +( +Warncke, 1975 +) + +]; +Mongolia +[ + +ssp. +melanocorne +Ebmer, 1988 + +]; +Taiwan +[ + +ssp. +koshunochare +(Strand, 1914) + +]. + + + + +Remarks. +In the North Caucasus, it occurs mainly in the forest belt of the mountains. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232083014D18EB40375A3FEB8.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232083014D18EB40375A3FEB8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a064a4d8b40 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232083014D18EB40375A3FEB8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Hemihalictus +) +quadrisignatum +( +Schenck, 1853 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Hylaeus quadrisignatus +Schenck, 1853: 150 + + +, + +. +Lectotype +: + +, +Germany +: [Wiesbaden]; designated by + +Ebmer (1975: 236) + +; SGNF. + + + +Published data. +No records in North Caucasus. + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Kabardino-Balkarian Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, Dzhinal Ridge, + +800-900 m + +, +30. +VI +.2009, NV + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(*North Caucasus, central and south of the European part); Europe, +Turkey +, Caucasus, +Iran +. + + + + +Remarks. +A rare species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232083017D18EB1B276C1FAAF.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232083017D18EB1B276C1FAAF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7199d995168 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232083017D18EB1B276C1FAAF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,403 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Hemihalictus +) +pygmaeum +( +Schenck, 1853 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Hylaeus pygmaeus +Schenck, 1853: 165 + + +, + +. +Syntype +: +1 ♂ +, +Germany +: +Wiesbaden +; MWG. + + + +Published data. +No records in North Caucasus. + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Krasnodar +Territory + +: +1 ♀ +, Lazarevskoye, +29.VII.1952 +, VR; +1 ♀ +, between +Novorossiyks +and +Abrau +, + +4.VII.2001 + +, K. Tomkovich; + + +1 ♀ +, Gelendzhik, Dzhankhot, pine forest, + +10. +VI +.2017 + +, AF; + + + +Stavropol +Territory + +: +2♀ +, Kislovodsk, 1, + +10. +V +.1949 + +,VP; + + +1♀ +,Shpakovskoye, +27.VII.1989 +, SB; + + +1♀ +, +Novozavedennoye +, near +Kuma River +, + + +3. +VI +.2010 + + +,NV; + + + +Adygei Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, + +47 km +S of Khadzokh + +, +Guzeripl +, + + +26. +VI +.1976 + + +, ES; + + + +Kabardino-Balkarian Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, + +5 km +N of Baksan + +, + +500 m + +, steppe, + +31.VII.1990 + +, YP; + + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Botlikh +, near +Tlokh +, + + +11. +V +.1988 + + +, Guseynzade; + + +1 ♀ +, +3 km +SW of +Novoterechnoye +, +43.99°N +, +47.32°E +, + + +20. +VI +.2018 + + +, +MP +, +VL +; + + +1 ♀ +, near +Barkhan Sarykum +, +43°01′N +43°23′E +, + + +31. +V +.2019 + + +, +MM +; + + +2 ♀ +, +5 km +SSW of +Rubas +, +41°52′N +48°16′E +, + + +2. +VI +.2019 + + +, +MP +, +VL +; + + +1 ♀ +, Tsudakhar, + +28. +V +.2022 + +, AF; +2 ♀ +, idem, +42°20′N +47°10′E +, + + +16. +VI +.2023 + + +, +MP +; + + +1 ♀ +, +Kamyshchay River valley +, +41°54′N +48°13′E +, + + +30. +V +.2022 + + +, AF; + + +5 ♀ +, near +Gubden +, +42°34′N +47°33′E +, + + +14. +VI +.2023 + + +, +MP + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(Crimea, *North Caucasus, south of the European part [ + +ssp. +patulum +(Vachal, 1905) + +]; North Africa, southern and locally Central Europe [nominate subspecies]; southeastern Europe, Caucasus, +Turkey +, +Syria +, +Jordan +, +Lebanon +, +Iran +, +Afghanistan +, +Pakistan +, Central Asia [ + +ssp. +patulum +(Vachal, 1905) + +]. + + + + +Remarks. +Mostly in steppe landscapes. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232083017D18EB68D75A3F926.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232083017D18EB68D75A3F926.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..34929b98b3a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232083017D18EB68D75A3F926.xml @@ -0,0 +1,148 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Hemihalictus +) +quadrinotatulum +( +Schenck, 1861 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Hylaeus quadrinotatulus +Schenck, 1861: 393 + + +, + +. +Syntypes +: “ +Pommern +[ +Poland +: +Pomorze District +] und Schweiz”; lost. + + + +Published data. +Chenikalova 2005: 26 +( +Stavropol +Territory). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, + +7 km +N of Rozhkao + +, +43°53′N +40°56′E +, + +4.VIII.2019 + +, AF + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus, east to eastern Siberia); Europe, +Turkey +, +Azerbaijan +, North +China +. + + + + +Remarks. +A rare species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232093016D18EB79477F9F8D1.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232093016D18EB79477F9F8D1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4d8c9319a97 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232093016D18EB79477F9F8D1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,333 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Hemihalictus +) +punctatissimum +( +Schenck, 1853 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Hylaeus punctatissimus +Schenck, 1853: 147 + + +, + +. +Neotype +: + +, +Germany +: Weilburg; designated by + +Ebmer (1975: 235) + +; SGNF. + + + +Published data. +Dathe 1980: 211 +(Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic); +Chenikalova 2005: 26 +( +Stavropol +Territory). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Krasnodar +Territory + +: +1 ♀ +, +Sochi +, +Lazarevskoye +, + +18.IV.1975 + +, VT; + + + +Adygei Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Shuntuk +, +Maykop +, +18. +VI +.1938, +Andreeva +; + + +1 ♂ +, + +55 km +S of Maykop + +, +Belaya River +, + +550 m + +, meadow, forest, +7. +VIII +.1990, YP; + + +1 ♀ +, +Caucasus Reserve +, +Guzeripl +, +44°003′N +40°141′E +, + +600 m + +, + +14. +VI.2023 + +, +S. Basov +; + + + +Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic + +: +3 ♂ +, + +10 km +E of Karachayevsk + +, +Mara River +, + +1050 m + +, forest, meadow, steppe slope, +2. +VIII +.1990, YP; + + + +Kabardino-Balkarian Republic + +: +1 ♂ +, +Nalchik +, +6. +VII +.1909, +D. Glasunov +; + + + +North Ossetian Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Ardon +, +Vladikavkaz +, +2. +V +.1900, +Demokidov +; + + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, + +6 km +NW of Chirkey + +, +43°00′N +46°53′E +, +26. +V +.2022, AF; + + +1 ♀ +, +Tsudakhar +, +42°19′N +47°09′E +, +28. +V +.2022, AF; + + +1 ♀ +, idem, +42°20′N +47°10′E +, +15. +VI +.2023, +MP +; + + +1 ♀ +, +5 km +NNW of +Chirag +, +41°52′N +47°23′E +, + +on + +Orobanche +sp. + + +, +25. +VI +.2023, AF + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus, European part, Ural); Europe, +Israel +, +Lebanon +, +Turkey +, Caucasus, +Iran +[nominate subspecies]; North Africa, Iberian Peninsula, Sicily [ + +ssp. +angustifrons +(Vachal, 1892) + +]. + + + + +Remarks. +Mostly in forest meadow and steppe slope of mountains. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2320A3015D18EB6D976CAF83A.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2320A3015D18EB6D976CAF83A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f352b848a9e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2320A3015D18EB6D976CAF83A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,348 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Hemihalictus +) +villosulum +( +Kirby, 1802 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Melitta villosula +Kirby, 1802: 62 + + +, + +. +Lectotype +: + +, +England +: no locality; designated by + +Ebmer (1988: 649) + +; BMNH. + + + +Published data. +Dathe 1980: 211 +(Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic); +Chenikalova 2005: 26 +( +Stavropol +Territory). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Krasnodar +Territory + +: +1 ♀ +, +Krasnaya Polyana +, +4. +VII +.1909, +Yakovleva +; + + +1 ♀ +, +Anapa +, +Lysaya Gora +, +15. +V +.1918, +Skorikov +; + + +3 ♀ +, +10 ♂ +, +Sochi +, +Razdolnoye +, + +15.VIII–24.IX.1930 + +, +Shestakov +; + + +38 ♀ +, +2 ♂ +, +Sochi +, +Lazarevskaya +, + +27.VII–8.IX. 1952 + +, VR; + + +1 ♀ +, idem, +27. +VI +.1976, VT; +1 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, + +20 km +WSW of Pavlovskaya + +, +Chelbas River +, meadow, +11. +VIII +.1990, YP; + + + +Stavropol +Territory + +: +5 ♀ +, +Kislovodsk +, +15. +VII +.1947, VP; + + +1 ♀ +, +Shpakovskoye +, agricultural fields, +1-5. +VIII +.1989, SB; + + +2 ♀ +, +15 km +W of +Stavropol +, + +600 m + +, steppe, +5. +VIII +.1990, YP; + + + +Adygei Republic + +: +1 ♂ +, +Shuntuk +, +Maykop +, +13. +VII +.1938, +Andreeva +; + + +1 ♀ +, + +55 km +S of Maykop + +, +Belaya River +, + +550 m + +, meadow, forest, +7. +VIII +.1990, YP; + + + +Chechen Republic + +: +5 ♀ +, +Borzoy +, + +10 km +SW of Shatoy + +, + +900 m + +, meadow, +23. +VII +.1990, YP; + + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Sarykum +, +11. +VII +.1990, Tanasiychuk + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus, as far east to the Far East); Europe, North Africa, +Syria +, +Israel +, +Lebanon +, +Turkey +, +Azerbaijan +, +Iran +, +Afghanistan +, +Tajikistan +, +Mongolia +, +China +, +Korea +, +Japan +, +India +, +Nepal +, +Malaysia +, +Canada +, +USA +. + + + + +Remarks. +Forest and steppe landscapes. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2320B3014D18EB7AA75F4F9EC.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2320B3014D18EB7AA75F4F9EC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5b6d3e8ca68 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2320B3014D18EB7AA75F4F9EC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Hemihalictus +) +semilucens +( +Alfken, 1914 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Hylaeus pygmaeus +Schenck, 1861: 278 + + +, 293; non + +Hylaeus pygmaeus +Schenck, 1853 + +( + +Evylaeus pygmaeus + +), + +. +Lectotype +: + +, +Germany +: Wiesbaden; designated by + +Ebmer (1975: 241) + +; MWG. + + + + + + +Halictus semilucens +Alfken, 1914: 281 + + +; nom. nov. pro + +Hylaeus pygmaeus +Schenck, 1861 + +. + + + +Published data. +Dathe 1980: 211 +(Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic). + + + + +Material examined. +No material examined. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus, European part); Europe, +Turkey +, +Azerbaijan +, +Afghanistan +, +Tajikistan +, +Kyrgyzstan +, +Kazakhstan +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2320C3010D18EB42270F5FD10.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2320C3010D18EB42270F5FD10.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..08a7b13352d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2320C3010D18EB42270F5FD10.xml @@ -0,0 +1,347 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Lasioglossum +) +haesitans +( +Blüthgen, 1931 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Halictus haesitans +Blüthgen, 1931: 348 + + +, + +. +Holotype +: + +, +Russia +: “Temir-chan-schura” ( +Dagestan +); ZISP. +Published data. + +Blüthgen 1931: 348 + +( +Dagestan Republic +); + +Pesenko 1986: 123 + +( +Dagestan Republic +, as + +L. korbi + +). + + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Chechen Republic + +: +1 ♂ +, +Paraboch +, + +13.VII.1927 + +, +Kirichenko + +; + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +1 ♂ +, + +22 km +SW of Terekli-Mekteb + +, +44°04′N +45°64′E +, + +21.VI.2018 + +, +MP +, +VL +, +MM + +; + +2 ♂ +, + +20 km +W of Makhachkala + +, +Sarykum +, +43°00′N +47°14′E +, 28, + + +29. +V +.2019 + + +, +MP +, +VL + +; + +2 ♂ +, +Kumtorkala +, near +Barkhan Sarykum +, +43°002′N +47°237′E +, + +31.V.2019 + +, +MM +, +KF + +; + +1 ♂ +, +5 km +NW of +Talgi +, +42°52′N +47°26′E +, + + +25. +VI +.2018 + + +, +KF + +; + +1 ♂ +, idem, + +31.05.2019 + +, +MP +, +VL + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus); +Greece +, +Azerbaijan +, +Turkey +. + + + + +Remarks. +Blüthgen (1931: 348) +described + +Lasioglossum haesitans + +from a male and suggested the possible synonymy of this species with + +L. korbi +(Blüthgen, 1929) + +because of the more likely association of the male of + +L. haesitans + +with female of + +L. korbi + +. Later + +L. haesitans + +was considered as a junior synonym of + +L. korbi + +( +Pesenko 1986 +; +Astafurova & Proshchalykin 2017a +, +2018 +). +Ebmer (2014: 347) +restored + +L. haesitans + +as a valid species. Ebmer does not give a diagnosis or description of the female, but noted on misidentification with + +L. quadrinotatum + +in published data. A female of + +L. haesitans + +from +Greece +was illustrated in +Pauly (2016) +. The correct identification of the species can only be done by the male, which differs from + +L. quadrinotatum + +by entirely black clypeus or only narrowly apical strip (vs wide yellow spot in + +L. quadrinotatum + +) and longer gonostylus, distinctly longer than wide ( +Fig. 9 +, vs about as long as wide in + +L. quadrinotatum + +, +Fig. 10 +). The records of + +Lasioglossum korbi + +in +Azerbaijan +by +Pesenko (1986) +and + +Astafurova +et al +. (2024a) + +refer to + +L. haesitans + +. Thus, + +L. korbi + +is known only from +Turkey +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2320E3011D18EB2DA7024FC3E.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2320E3011D18EB2DA7024FC3E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2666e01db43 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2320E3011D18EB2DA7024FC3E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,320 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Lasioglossum +) +lativentre +( +Schenck, 1853 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Hylaeus lativentris +Schenck, 1853: 151 + + +, + +. +Neotype +: + +, +Germany +: Reiderbach (Taunus); designated by + +Ebmer (1975: 237) + +; SGNF. + + + +Published data. +Blüthgen 1931: 350 +( +Krasnodar +Territory, as + +Halictus lativentris +var. +sotschica + +); +Pesenko 1986: 123 +(Caucasus); +Chenikalova 2005: 27 +( +Stavropol +Territory). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Krasnodar +Territory + +: +1 ♀ +, +Krasnodar +, +6. +VII +.1975, +P.Voloshina +; + + + +Adygei Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Maykop +, 1930, +Pogodina +; + + +7 ♀ +, +Caucasus Reserve +, +Guzeripl +, +44°003′N +40°141′E +, + +600 m + +, + +14. +VI.2023 + +, +S. Basov +; + + + +Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic + +: +3 ♀ +, +Teberda Reserve +, +Dzhamagat +gorge, +23. +VI +.1982, +E. Narchuk +; + + +1 ♀ +, +Teberda +, +Teberda Reserve +, +Teberda River valley +, +24. +VI +.1982, +E. Narchuk +; + + + +Chechen Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Borzoy +, + +10 km +SW of Shatoy + +, + +900 m + +, meadow, +23. +VII +.1990, YP; + + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, + +7 km +SE of Gedzhukh + +, +42°03′N +48°05′E +, +3. +VI +.2019, +MP +, +VL +; + + +1 ♀ +, +3 km +SW of +Gedzhukh +, +42°05′N +48°01′E +, +6. +V +.2022, AF; + + +1 ♀ +, near +Tatil +, +42°00′N +48°00′E +, +23. +V +.2022, AF; + + +2 ♀ +, +Nikel +, +Belaya River +, 44°183′N 40°150′E, +18. +VI +.2023, +S. Basov +; + + +1 ♀ +, +Primorskiy +, +Samur Forest +, +41°54′N +48°28′E +, +27. +V +.2023, S. Basov + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus, Crimea, European part); Europe, +Turkey +, Caucasus, Near East, +Iran +. + + + + +Remarks. +In the North Caucasus this species was found mostly in forest meadow. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2320F3011D18EB4DE75A3FE9D.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2320F3011D18EB4DE75A3FE9D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5486c4f3155 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2320F3011D18EB4DE75A3FE9D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,164 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Lasioglossum +) +laevigatum +( +Kirby, 1802 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Melitta laevigata +Kirby, 1802: 75 + + +, + +. +Lectotype +: + +, +England +: Barham; designated by + +Ebmer (1988: 595) + +; BMNH. + + + +Published data. +Pesenko 1986: 139 +(Caucasus); +Chenikalova 2005: 26 +( +Stavropol +Territory). + + + + +Material examined. + + +Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Teberda +, +Muka River valley +, + +16.VI.1953 + +, +Arens + +; + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, near +Tatil +, +42°00′N +48°00′E +, + +23.V.2022 + +, +D. Puzanov + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus, as east to the Urals); Europe, +Turkey +, Caucasus, +Iran +. + + + + +Remarks. +A rare species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23210300FD18EB26E76DDFD1F.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23210300FD18EB26E76DDFD1F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d7971953d66 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23210300FD18EB26E76DDFD1F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,220 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Hemihalictus +) +convexiusculum +( +Schenck, 1853 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Hylaeus convexiusculus +Schenck, 1853: 166 + + +, + +. +Neotype +: + +, +Germany +: Mombach bei Mainz; designated by + +Ebmer (1975: 239) + +; SGNF. + + + +Published data. +No records from North Caucasus. + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Dagestan Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Maskinda +, +41°25′N +47°51′E +, + + +4. +VI +.2019 + + +, +MP +, +VL + +; + +1 ♀ +, +Tsudakhar +, +42°19′N +47°09′E +, + + +28. +V +.2022 + + +, AF + +; + +3 ♀ +, idem, + + +15. +VI +.2023 + + +, +MP + +; + +1 ♀ +, +Khotoch +, +42°24′N +46°57′E +, + + +17. +VI +.2023 + + +, +MP + +; + +1 ♀ +, near +Maydanskoye +, +42°36′07″N +, +46°58′13″E +, + +19.VII.2023 + +, +MP + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(*North Caucasus, south of the European part east to Bashkir Republic); Middle and southern Europe, +Lebanon +, +Turkey +, +Azerbaijan +, +Iran +. + + + + +Remarks. +A rare species, in steppe areas. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23211300FD18EB5D876DDFF09.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23211300FD18EB5D876DDFF09.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1ad8bc5020b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F23211300FD18EB5D876DDFF09.xml @@ -0,0 +1,210 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Hemihalictus +) +clypeare +( +Schenck, 1853 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Hylaeus clypearis +Schenck, 1853: 162 + + +, + +. +Syntype +: +1 ♀ +, +Germany +: +Wiesbaden +; MWG. + + + +Published data. +Blüthgen 1935: 120 +( +Krasnodar +Territory). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Krasnodar +Territory + +: +1 ♀ +, +Gelendzhik +, + +1.VIII.1908 + +, +N. Vorobyev +; + + +8 ♀ +, Lazarevskoye, 12.VIII, 22.VIII., + +5.IX.1952 + +, VR; + + +Kabardino-Balkarian Republic +: +1 ♂ +, + +5 km +N of Baksan + +, + +500 m + +, steppe, + +31.VII. 1990 + +, YP + +; + + +Stavropol +Territory + +: +1 ♀ +, +15 km +W of +Stavropol +, + +600 m + +, steppe, + +5.VIII.1990 + +, YP; + + +1 ♀ +, Shpakovskoye, + +27.VII.1989 + +, SB + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus, Crimea, south of the European part, south Ural); southern and locally central Europe, +Lebanon +, +Turkey +, +Azerbaijan +, +Georgia +, +Iran +, +Kyrgyzstan +, +Kazakhstan +. + + + + +Remarks. +A rare species, in steppe areas. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232163009D18EB0CD74ADFAB5.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232163009D18EB0CD74ADFAB5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..12b3ca7fbfb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232163009D18EB0CD74ADFAB5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,254 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Hemihalictus +) +nitidiusculum +( +Kirby, 1802 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Melitta nitidiuscula +Kirby, 1802: 64 + + +, + +. +Lectotype +: + +, +England +: Barham; designated by Ebmer (in + +Ebmer & Sakagami 1985: 302 + +); BMNH. + + + +Published data. +Morawitz 1873: 167 +( +Dagestan Republic +). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Stavropol +Territory + +: +1 ♀ +, +7 ♂ +, +Kislovodsk +, + +27.XI–11.X.1947 + +, VP; + + +1 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, idem, + +9.X.1947 + +, VP; + + +1 ♀ +, Shpakovskoye, + +27. +VII +.1989 + +, SB; + + +1 ♂ +, +Novozavedennoye +, near +Kuma River +, +3. +VI +.2010, NV; + + + +Adygei Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Shuntuk +, +Maykop +, +24. +V +.1938, +Andreeva +; + + + +North Ossetian Republic + +: +1 ♂ +, +Gizel +, + +10 km +W of Vladikavkaz + +, + +550 m + +, steppe area, +25. +VII +.1990, YP; + + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Botlikh +, near +Tlokh +, +10. +V +.1988, Kh. Aliyev; + + +1 ♀ +, Tekipirkent, +41°20′N +47°52′E +, + +29. +VI +.2023 + +, +MP +. + + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus, as far east to the +Altai +); Europe, North Africa, +Lebanon +, +Turkey +, +Azerbaijan +, +Kazakhstan +, +Turkmenistan +, +Iran +[nominate subspecies]; Sardinia [ + +ssp. +pseudocombinatum +(Blüthgen, 1921) + +]. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232163009D18EB29275A3FCEF.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232163009D18EB29275A3FCEF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e0e7e69e28c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232163009D18EB29275A3FCEF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,149 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Hemihalictus +) +minutissimum +( +Kirby, 1802 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Melitta minutissima +Kirby, 1802: 63 + + +, + +, + +. +Lectotype +: + +, +England +: Barham; designated by + +Ebmer (1988: 665) + +; BMNH. + + + +Published data. +No records from North Caucasus. + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Krasnodar +Territory + +: +1 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, +Goryachiy Kluch distr. +, +Suzdalskaya +, +44°45′N +39°22′E +, garden, 7, + +15.VIII.2011 + +, YA + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(*North Caucasus, Crimea, European part, South Ural); Europe, North Africa, Caucasus, +Turkey +, +Israel +. + + + + +Remarks. +A rare species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232163016D18EB4097079FEC0.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232163016D18EB4097079FEC0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b1df46a7f59 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232163016D18EB4097079FEC0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,174 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Hemihalictus +) +parvulum +( +Schenck, 1853 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Hylaeus parvulus +Schenck, 1853: 153 + + +, + +. +Lectotype +: + +, +Germany +: +Hessen +; designated by + +Ebmer (1974: 118) + +; SGNF. + + + +Published data. +Dathe 1980: 211 +(Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic); +Chenikalova 2005: 26 +( +Stavropol +Territory). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Adygei Republic + +: +2 ♀ +, + +47 km +S of Khadzokh + +, +Guzeripl +, + +26.VI.1976 + +, ES + +; + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +1 ♂ +, +Khotoch +, +42°24′N +46°57′E +, + +17.VI.2023 + +, +MP + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus, European part, Ural); Europe, +Turkey +, +Azerbaijan +, +Armenia +, +Iran +. + + + + +Remarks. +A relatively common species in Europe, but rare in North Caucasus. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232173008D18EB17370F0FB68.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232173008D18EB17370F0FB68.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..97a73195426 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232173008D18EB17370F0FB68.xml @@ -0,0 +1,402 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Hemihalictus +) +lucidulum +( +Schenck, 1861 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Hylaeus lucidulus +Schenck, 1861: 292 + + +, + +. +Lectotype +: + +, +Germany +: Wiesbaden; designated by + +Ebmer (1975: 240) + +; MWG. + + + +Published data. +Dathe 1980: 211 +(Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic); +Chenikalova 2005: 26 +( +Stavropol +Territory). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Krasnodar +Territory + +: +1 ♀ +, + +20 km +WSW of Pavlovskaya + +, +Chelbas River +, meadow, + +11.VIII.1990 + +, YP; + + +4 ♀ +, +Goryachiy Kluch distr. +, +Suzdalskaya +, +44°45′N +39°22′E +, + +6.VIII.2011 + +, YA; + + + +Stavropol +Territory + +: +1 ♀ +, +Zimnyaya Stavka +, +Kuma River +, + +5. +V + +.1911, Uvarov; + + +6 ♀ +, +Kislovodsk +, + +16.XI–1.XII.1947 + +, VP; + + +1 ♀ +, idem, + +9.X.1956 + +; + + +1 ♀ +, +Shpakovskoye +, + +3. +VI + +.1989, SB; + + +idem, +2 ♀ +, +27.VII.1989 +, SB; + + +1 ♀ +, +Novozavedennoye +, near +Kuma River +, + +20.VII.2004 + +, NV; + + + +Adygei Republic + +: +3 ♀ +, +Maykop +, 1933, +Pogodina +; + + +3 ♀ +, +Shuntuk +, +Maykop +, 23. +V +, +30.VII.1938 +, Andreeva; + + + +North Ossetian Republic + +: +2 ♀ +, +Ardon +, +Vladikavkaz +, + +28.IV.1900 + +, +Demokidov +; + + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +5 ♀ +, +Botlikh +, near +Tlokh +, + +10. +V + +.1988, Kh. Aliyev; + + +1 ♀ +, +Barkhan Sarykum +, +43°01′N +43°23′E +, + +2. +VI + +.2017, +MM +; + + +1 ♂ +, +8 km +SE of +Staroterechnoye +, +43.792°N +, +47.527°E +, + +19. +VI + +.2018, +MP +, +VL +, +MM +; + + +12 ♀ +, +1 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, near +Kufa +, + +6 km +NW of Rutul + +, + +1500 m + +, +41°56′N +47°36′E +, + +1.VII.2018 + +, +KF +; + + +3 ♀ +, +Tsudakhar +, +42°20′N +47°10′E +, + +18. +VI + +.2023, +MP +; + + +1 ♀ +, +Arakani +, +42°36′N +46°59′E +, + +22. +VI + +.2023, +MP + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus, east to western Siberia); Europe, +Israel +, +Lebanon +, +Turkey +, +Azerbaijan +, +Iran +, +Afghanistan +, +Pakistan +, Central Asia, +Mongolia +, Northern +China +. + + + + +Remarks +. Long flying season, in the North Caucasus from April to the end of November. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2321C3003D18EB08B7715F9E0.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2321C3003D18EB08B7715F9E0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f8053150e0b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2321C3003D18EB08B7715F9E0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,438 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Dialictus +) +aeratum +( +Kirby, 1802 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Melitta aerata +Kirby, 1802: 58 + + +, + +, + +. +Lectotype +: + +, +England +: Barham; designated by + +Ebmer (1976a: 403) + +; BMNH. + + + +Published data. +Dathe 1980: 210 +(Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic); +Chenikalova 2005: 26 +( +Stavropol +Territory). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Stavropol +Territory + +: +1 ♀ +, +Kislovodsk +, + +15.XI.1947 + +, VP + +; + +1 ♀ +, idem, + +29.IV.1949 + + +; + +3 ♀ +, idem, + + +10. +V +.1949 + + + +; + +4 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, idem, + +9-15.X.1956 + + +; + +1 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, +Shpakovskoye +, + + +27. +V +.1986 + + +, SB + +; + +1 ♀ +, idem, + +27.VII.1989 + + +; + + +Adygei Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, Maykop, 1933, Pogodina + +; + +1 ♀ +, +Shuntuk +, +Maykop +, + + +25. +VI +.1938 + + + +; + +Andreeva; +1 ♀ +, idem, + +12.VII.1938 + + +; + + +Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic + +: +3 ♀ +, +Teberda Nature Reserve +, +Dzhamagat +gorge, + + +23. +VI +.1982 + + +, E. Narchuk + +; + +2 ♀ +, + +10 km +E of Karachayevsk + +, +Mara River +, + +1050 m + +, forest, meadow, steppe slope, + +2.VIII.1990 + +, YP + +; + + +Kabardino-Balkarian Republicn Republic + +: +3 ♀ +, +Gizel +, + +10 km +W of Vladikavkaz + +, + +550 m + +, steppe, + +25.VII.1990 + +, YP + +; + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, + +10 km +E of Akhta + +, + +22.VII.1983 + +, E. Narchuk + +; + +1 ♂ +, near +Kufa +, + +6 km +NW of Rutul + +, + +1500 m + +, +41°56′N +47°36′E +, + + +29. +VI +.2018 + + +, YA + +; + +2 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, idem, + +1.VII.2018 + +, +KF + +; + +9 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, near +Gubden +, +42°34′N +47°33′E +, + + +14. +VI +.2023 + + +, +MP + +; + +1 ♂ +, +6 km +SW of +Gubden +, 42°544′ N 47°499′E, + + +25. +VI +.2018 + + +, YA + +; + +3 ♀ +, +Khotoch +, +42°24′N +46°57′E +, + + +17. +VI +.2023 + + +, +MP + +; + +4 ♀ +, +Tsudakhar +, +42°19′N +47°09′E +, + + +18. +VI +.2023 + + +, +MP + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus, European part); Europe, +Turkey +, +Azerbaijan +, +Syria +, +Iran +, Central Asia. + + + + +Remarks. +In the North Caucasus this species is recorded from mountain and sub-mountain territories in forest and steppe areas. Long flying season from April to November. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2321C3003D18EB26F755CFCA0.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2321C3003D18EB26F755CFCA0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..50ef0d5dbaf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2321C3003D18EB26F755CFCA0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,300 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Biennilaeus +) +marginatum +( +Brullé, 1832 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Halictus marginatus +Brullé, 1832: 351 + + +, + +. +Lectotype +: + +, +Greece +: +Peloponnes +; designated by + +Ebmer (1972a: 590) + +; MNP. + + + +Published data. +Morawitz 1873: 165 +( +Dagestan Republic +, as + +Halictus riparius + +); +Chenikalova 2005: 26 +( +Stavropol +Territory). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Krasnodar +Territory + +: +19 ♀ +, “Krasny Les” [Nature Reserve], +Kuban River +, 1915, +Bryanskiy + +; + +1 ♂ +, Sochi, Okhun, +24.X.1926 +, A. Shestakov; +4 ♀ +, Sochi, Lazarevskoye, +18.IV.1975 +, VT; + + + +Stavropol +Territory + +: +1 ♀ +, +Novozavedennoye +, near +Kuma River +, + + +3. +VI +.2010 + + +, NV + +; + +5 ♀ +, Kislovodsk, Kurortny Park, meadow, forest, +25-30.IV.2018 +, SB + +; + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +4 ♀ +, +Khunzakh +, + + +29. +V +.1960 + + +, Tanasiychuk + +; + +1 ♀ +, near Makhachkala, + +18. +V +.1992 + +, M. Volkovich + +; + +1 ♀ +, +Dubki +, +43°01′N +46°56′E +, + + +28. +V +.2019 + + +, +MP +, +VL + +; + +1 ♀ +, +1.5 km +SE of +Pionernyi +, +43°03′N +46°51′E +, + + +28. +V +.2019 + + +, +MP +, +VL + +; + +1 ♀ +, near +Talgi +, +42°00′N +48°00′E +, + + +4. +V +.2022 + + +, +KF + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus, European part); Southern and locally Central Europe, North Africa, +Turkey +, Caucasus, +Syria +, +Jordan +, +Israel +, +Lebanon +, +Iraq +, +Iran +, +Afghanistan +, +Pakistan +, Central Asia, Northwestern +India +, +Nepal +. + + + + +Remarks. +In the North Caucasus this species is found in mountain or floodplain forests and steppe landscapes. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2321E3001D18EB27775A3FD3D.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2321E3001D18EB27775A3FD3D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9ba9598d27b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2321E3001D18EB27775A3FD3D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,224 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Dialictus +) +nitidulum +( +Fabricius, 1804 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Prosopis nitidula +Fabricius, 1804: 294 + + +, + +. +Lectotype +: + +, +Germany +: no locality; designated by + +Warncke (1973: 25) + +; NHMD. + + + +Published data. +Chenikalova 2005: 26 +( +Stavropol +Territory). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Stavropol +Territory + +: +2 ♀ +, +Kislovodsk +, + +15.V.1949 +, +9.X.1956 + +, VP + +; + +1 ♂ +, +Pyatigorsk +, +Mashuk Mts +, + +8.VII.1981 + +, O. Kovalev + +; + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Tsudakhar +, +42°19′N +47°09′E +, + + +1. +VI +.2019 + + +, +MP +, +VL + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus; European part, Ural); eastern Europe [ + +ssp. +aeneidorsum +(Alfken, 1921) + +]; western Europe [nominate subspecies]; southern Europe from Balkans to +Turkey +[ + +ssp. +fudakovskii +( +Noskiewicz 1925 +) + +]; Crete [ + +ssp. +cretense +( +Warncke, 1975 +) + +]; Sardinia [ +sardinum +Ebmer, 1978 +]; Balearic Islands [ + +ssp. +hammi +(Saunders, 1904) + +]; +Tajikistan +, +Kyrgyzstan +[ + +ssp. +oculare +( +Morawitz, 1893 +) + +]. + + + + +Remarks. +A rare species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2321E300ED18EB5157756FE9C.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2321E300ED18EB5157756FE9C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6d40f8012a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2321E300ED18EB5157756FE9C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,321 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Hemihalictus +) +bluethgeni +Ebmer, 1971 + + + + + + + + + + +Halictus hirtiventris +Blüthgen, 1923: 283 + + +, non + +Halictus hirtiventres +Cockerell, 1922 + +( + +Parasphecodes hirtiventris + +), + +, + +. +Holotype +: + +, +Croatia +: +Carlovac +( +Istria +Peninsula +); NMW. + + + + + + +Lasioglossum blüthgeni +Ebmer, 1971: 110 + + +, +nom. nov. +pro + +Halictus hirtiventris +Blüthgen, 1923 + +. + + + +Published data. +Ebmer 2000: 424 +( +Krasnodar +Territory). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Krasnodar +Territory + +: +2 ♀ +, +Lazarevskoye +, +8. +V +.1979, VT; + + +1 ♀ +, idem, +24. +V +.1973; +8 ♀ +, +Markotkh Gorge +, +26-28. +V +.2010, +I. Melnik +; + + +1 ♀ +, +Novorossiysk +, +Abrau Reserve +, + +on + +Orobanche laxissima + + +, +6. +VII +.2014, AF; + + +1 ♂ +, +Gelendzhik distr. +, +between Krinitzy and Praskoveevks +, +2. +VII +.2004, +K. Tomkovich +; + +Stavropol +Territory + +: + + +1 ♀ +, +Kislovodsk +, + +9.X.1956 + +, VP; + + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Kamyshchay River valley +, +41°54′N +48°13′E +, +25. +VI +.2022, +S. Ivanov +; + + +1 ♀ +, +Gunib +, 42°401′N 46°917′E, +31. +V +.2023, S. Basov + +. + + +Additional material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Kursk Province + +: +1 ♂ +, +Central-Chernozem Nature Reserve +, +Streletzk +steppe, +27. +VIII +.2022, +K. Ivlev +; + + + +Voronezh Province + +: +1 ♀ +, +Osykino +, + +on + +Rabelera holostea + + +, +28. +V +.2022, +K. Ivlev +; + +Crimea + +: + + +1 ♀ +, +Karadag +, +Karagach +, +12. +V +.1992, D. Kasparyan + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus, central of the *European part, * +Crimea +); Southern and locally middle Europe, +Ukraine +, +Azerbaijan +, +Georgia +, +Lebanon +, +Turkey +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2321F3000D18EB3DF7563FD15.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2321F3000D18EB3DF7563FD15.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6cab27bc4a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2321F3000D18EB3DF7563FD15.xml @@ -0,0 +1,324 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Dialictus +) +leucopus +( +Kirby, 1802 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Melitta leucopus +Kirby, 1802: 59 + + +, + +. +Lectotype +: + +, +England +: no locality; designated by + +Ebmer (1988: 638) + +; BMNH. + + + +Published data. +Dathe 1980: 211 +(Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic); +Chenikalova 2005: 26 +( +Stavropol +Territory). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Stavropol +Territory + +: +3 ♀ +, Kislovodsk, +10.X.1956 +, VP + +; + +1 ♀ +, +Shpakovskoye +, + +27. +V + +.1988, SB + +; + + +Adygei Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, + +47 km +S of Khadzokh + +, +Guzeripl +, + +26. +VI + +.1976, ES + +; + +1 ♀ +, +Novozavedennoye +, near +Kuma River +, + +20.VII.2004 + +, NV + +; + + +Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic + +: +8 ♀ +, +Teberda NR +, +Dzhamagat +gorge, + +23. +VI + +.1982, E. Narchuk + +; + + +Kabardino-Balkarian Republic + +: +1 ♂ +, + +5 km +N of Baksan + +, + +500 m + +, steppe, + +31.VII. 1990 + +, YP + +; + +1 ♀ +, +Sukanskiy +gorge, +Zhemtal +, + +1980 m + +, + +2-6. +VI + +.2008, NV + +; + + +North Ossetian Republic + +: +1 ♂ +, + +20 km +S of Buran + +, + +1850 m + +, steppe slope, + +26-28.VII.1990 + +, YP + +; + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +2 ♂ +, +Levashi +, + +14.VII.1960 + +, +Tanasiychuk + +; + +1 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, near +Kufa +, + +6 km +NW of Rutul + +, + +1500 m + +, 41°565′N 47°362′E, + +1.VII.2018 + +, YA, +KF + +; + +2 ♀ +, valley of +Kurush River +, +41°15′N +47°49′E +, 15, + +26. +VI + +.2023, +MP + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(east to Yakutia); Europe, +Turkey +, +Azerbaijan +, +Iran +. + + + + +Remarks. +In the North Caucasus this species is recorded from mountain and plane territories in forest and steppe areas. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2321F3001D18EB7AB778FFF25.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2321F3001D18EB7AB778FFF25.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..09cbcb3e7aa --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2321F3001D18EB7AB778FFF25.xml @@ -0,0 +1,543 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Dialictus +) +morio +( +Fabricius, 1793 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Hylaeus morio + +Fabricius, 1793: 306 + + + +, + +. +Syntype +(s): +France +: no locality; lost. + + + +Published data. +Morawitz 1873: 174 +( +Dagestan Republic +); +Mamayeva & Krasnova 1971: 45 +( +Krasnodar +Territory); +Dathe 1980: 211 +( +Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic +); +Chenikalova 2005: 26 +( +Stavropol +Territory). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Krasnodar +Territory + +: +11 ♀ +, +Lazarevskoye +, + +1.VIII–5.IX.1952 + +, +V +. +Richter +; + + +6 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, idem, + +5. + +VII +.1974, VT; + +Stavropol +Territory + +: + + +2 ♀ +, +Kislovodsk +, + +15. + +V +.1949, VP; +7 ♂ +, idem, + +10.X.1956 + + +; + +1 ♀ +, + +10 km +NW of +Stavropol + +, +Shpakovskoye +, +3. +VI +.1987, SB; + + +1 ♀ +, idem, +14. +VII +.1989 + +; + +2 ♂ +, idem, +27. +VII +.1989 + +; + +2 ♀ +, +20 km +W of +Stavropol +, +17. +VII +.1989, SB; + + +4 ♀ +, +15 km +W of +Stavropol +, + +600 m + +, steppe, +5. +VIII +.1990, YP; + + +7 ♀ +, +Kislovodsk +, +Lermontov Rock +, meadow, forest, + +29.IV.2018 + +, SB; + + +idem, +4 ♀ +, +Kurortny Park +, meadow, forest, +3. +V +.2018, SB; + + +2 ♀ +, idem, road on +Bolshoye Sedlo Mts. +, meadow, forest, +1. +V +.2018, SB; + + + +Adygei Republic + +: +4 ♂ +, +Maykop +, 1933, +Pogodina +; +3 ♀ +, +Shuntuk +, +Maykop +, +24. +V +.1938, +Andreeva +; + + +3 ♀ +, + +47 km +S of Khadzokh + +, +Guzeripl +, +26. +VI +.1976, ES; + + +1 ♀ +, + +55 km +S of Maykop + +, +Belaya River +, + +550 m + +, meadow, forest, +7. +VIII +.1990, YP; + + +4 ♀ +, +7 ♂ +, +Dakhovskaya +, +44.199°N +, +40.170°E +, +19-24. +VIII +.2009, +K. Tomkovich +; + + + +Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Teberda Nature Reserve +, +Dzhamagat +gorge, +23. +VI +.1982, +E. Narchuk +; + + +3 ♀ +, +Teberda +, +Teberda River valley +, +24. +VI +.1982, +E. Narchuk +; + + +19 ♀ +, +13 ♂ +, + +10 km +E of Karachayevsk + +, +Mara River +, + +1050 m + +, forest, meadow, steppe slope, +2. +VIII +.1990, YP; + + + +Kabardino-Balkarian Republic + +: +22 ♀ +, +3 ♂ +, + +5 km +N of Baksan + +, + +500 m + +, steppe, +31. +VII +. 1990, YP; + + + +North Ossetian Republic + +: +23 ♀ +, +Ardon +, +Vladikavkaz +, + +28.IV.1900 + +, +Demokidov +; +24 ♀ +, +Gizel +, + +10 km +W of Vladikavkaz + +, + +550 m + +, steppe, +25. +VII +.1990, YP; + + +1 ♀ +, +20 km +S of +Buran +, + +1850 m + +, steppe slope, +28. +VII +.1990, YP; + + + +Ingush Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Salgi +, +29. +VII +.1927, +Kirichenko +; + +Chechen Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Borzoy +, + +10 km +SW of Shatoy + +, + +900 m + +, meadow, +23. +VII +.1990, YP; + + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +19 ♀ +, +Shalbuzdag Mts +, +27. +VII +.1983, +I. Kerzhner +; + + +2 ♀ +, near +Manasual +, +42°45′N +47°00′E +, +23. +VI +.2021, AF + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(east to +Altai +); Europe, +Turkey +, Caucasus, +Israel +, +Lebanon +[nominate subspecies]; North Africa, +Spain +[ + +ssp. cordialie ( +Pérez, 1903 +) + +]. + + + + +Remarks. +This is a common species in forest and steppe landscapes. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232383027D18EB09A75A3FA93.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232383027D18EB09A75A3FA93.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6535df7f216 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232383027D18EB09A75A3FA93.xml @@ -0,0 +1,171 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Sphecodogastra +) +minutulum +( +Schenck, 1853 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Hylaeus minutulus +Schenck, 1853: 165 + + +, [ + +]. +Lectotype +: + +, +Germany +: [ +Hessen +]; designated by + +Ebmer (1975: 239) + +; SGNF. + + + +Published data. +No records in North Caucasus. + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Adygei Republic + +: +2 ♀ +, +3 ♂ +, +Maykop distr. +, +Caucasus Nature Reserve +, +Guzeripl +, + +21.VII.1936 + +, Khramtzov + +. + + +Additional material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Volgograd Province + +: +1 ♀ +, +Tinguta +, + +30. +VI + +.1954, +N. Rasumova +[ +ZMMU +] + +. + + + + +Distribution. +* +Russia +(Adygei Republic, +Volgograd Province +); Centraland Southern Europe. + + + + +Remarks. +A rare species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232393027D18EB5077508FC5D.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232393027D18EB5077508FC5D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a0a0eba382c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F232393027D18EB5077508FC5D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,769 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Sphecodogastra +) +malachurum +( +Kirby, 1802 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Melitta malachura +Kirby, 1802: 67 + + +, + +. +Lectotype +: + +, +England +: Brentford near London; designated by + +Ebmer (1988: 601) + +; BMNH. + + + +Published data. +Mamayeva & Krasnova 1971: 45 +( +Krasnodar +Territory); +Golikov 1987: 49 +( +Krasnodar +Territory); +Chenikalova 2005: 26 +( +Stavropol +Territory). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Krasnodar +Territory + +: +2 ♀ +, +10 ♂ +, +Gelendzhik +, + +1.VIII.1908 + +, +N. Vorobyev +; + + +1 ♂ +, +Tuapse +, + +26.X.1910 + +, +Shaposhnikov +; + + +9 ♀ +, +Anapa +, + + +1. +V +.1918 + + +, +Skorikov +; + + +3 ♀ +, +Slavyanskiy +, + +on + +Anchusa officinalis + + +, + + +3. +VI +.1937 + + +, VR; + + +26 ♀ +, idem, + +on + +Anthemis austiaca + + +, + + +4. +VI +.1938 + + +, VR; + + +1 ♀ +, idem + +on + +Barbarea vulgaris + + +, + + +6. +VI +.1938 + + +, +Z. Koshur +; + + +22 ♀ +, idem, + +Echium vulgare + +, + + +11. +VI +.1938 + + +, VR; + + +55 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, idem, + +on + +Melilotus officinalis + + +, + + +15. +VI +.1938 + + +, VR; + + +20 ♀ +, idem, + +Convolvulus arvensis + +, + + +17. +VI +.1938 + + +, VR; + + +4 ♀ +, idem, + +on + +Helianthus annuus + + +, + +5.VII.1938 + +, VR; + + +15 ♀ +, +16 ♂ +, idem, + +on + +Cichorium intybus + + +, 12.VII, + +30.VII.1938 + +, VR; + + +2 ♀ +, idem, + +on + +Centaurea trichocephala + + +, + +1.VIII.1938 + +, VR; + + +5 ♀ +, +9 ♂ +, +Lazarevskoye +, + +5.IX.1952 + +, VR; + + +2 ♀ +, +20 km +NE of +Krasnodar +, + +10.VII.1990 + +, YP; + + +34 ♀ +, +36 ♂ +, + +20 km +WSW of Pavlovskaya + +, +Chelbas River +, meadow, + +11.VIII.1990 + +, YP; + + +5 ♀ +, +17 ♂ +, +Goryachiy Kluch +distr, +Suzdalskaya +, +44°45′N +39°22′E +, + +6-14.VIII.2011 + +, +YA +; + + + +Stavropol +Territory + +: +1 ♀ +, +Kislovodsk +, + +24.IV.1949 + +, VP; + + +2 ♀ +, +2 ♂ +, + +16 km +NW of +Stavropol + +, +Pelagiada +, + +29.VII.1981 + +, +O. Kovalev +; + + +1 ♀ +, +Vysotskoye +, +Petrovsk distr. +, + +12.VIII.1987 + +, +Drapolyuk +; + + +15 ♀ +, +14 ♂ +, +Shpakovskoye +, 27.VII, + +1-5.VIII.1989 + +, +SB +; + + +4 ♀ +, +2 ♂ +, +15 km +W of +Stavropol +, + +600 m + +, steppe, + +5.VIII.1990 + +, YP; + + + +Adygei Republic + +: +2 ♀ +, +Maykop +, 1930, +Pogodina +; + + +18 ♀ +, +6 ♂ +, +Shuntuk +, +Maykop +, VII-VIII.1938, +Andreeva +; + + + +Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Teberda +, 1915, +Kryzhanovskiy +; + + +14 ♀ +, + +10 km +E of Karachayevsk + +, +Mara River +, + +1050 m + +, forest, meadow, steppe slope, + +2.VIII.1990 + +, YP; + + + +Kabardino-Balkarian Republic + +: +90 ♀ +, +12 ♂ +, + +5 km +N of Baksan + +, + +500 m + +, steppe, + +31.VII. 1990 + +, YP; + + + +North Ossetian Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Ardon +, +Vladikavkaz +, + + +2. +V +.1900 + + +, +Demokidov +; + + +3 ♀ +, +Gizel +, + +10 km +W of Vladikavkaz + +, + +550 m + +, steppe, + +25.VII.1990 + +, YP; + + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +1 ♂ +, + +10 km +E of Akhta + +, + +22.VII.1983 + +, +E. Narchuk +; + + +1 ♀ +, +Manaskent +, + +30 km +SE of Makhachkala + +, steppe slope, + +21.VII.1990 + +, YP; + + +12 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, +Kochubey +, +44.398°N +, +46.541°E +, + +on + +Convolvulus arvensis + + +, + + +18. +VI +.2018 + + +, +YA +; + + +1 ♀ +, +2 ♂ +, +Derbent +, 28, + + +29. +VI +.2018 + + +, +YA +, +MP +, +VL +, +MM +; + + +1 ♂ +, + +20 km +W of Makhachkala + +, +Sarykum +, +43°00′N +47°14′E +, 28, + + +29. +V +.2019 + + +, +MP +, +VL +; + + +1 ♀ +, +Kamyshchay River valley +, +41°54′N +48°13′E +, + + +30. +V +.2022 + + + +, AF. + + +Additional material examined. + +RUSSIA +. * + +Astrakhan Province + +: +6 ♀ +, +Solodniki +, +Volga River +, steppe, + +19.VII.1990 + +, YP + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus, Crimea, European part in steppe zone); Europe, North Africa, +Israel +, +Lebanon +, +Turkey +, +Azerbaijan +, +Georgia +, +Iran +, +Turkmenistan +. + + + + +Remarks. +A common species, mostly in steppe and agricultural landscapes. Reported as a +Lucerne +pollinator ( +Golikov 1987 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2323B3025D18EB54A71D8FD2D.xml b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2323B3025D18EB54A71D8FD2D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..119aa4c5b91 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B6/18/87/B61887F2323B3025D18EB54A71D8FD2D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,810 @@ + + + +Review of the bee genus Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) fauna of the Ciscaucasia region + + + +Author + +Astafurova, Yulia V. +Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab., 1, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. + + + +Author + +Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. +Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok- 22, 690022, Russia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-05-22 + + +5637 + + +3 + + +515 +558 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.4 +1175-5326 +15562911 +4EB32F73-84F7-4A44-A981-0CEE12045DC5 + + + + + + + +Lasioglossum +( +Sphecodogastra +) +pauxillum +( +Schenck, 1853 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Hylaeus pauxillus +Schenck, 1853: 146 + + +, + +. +Lectotype +: + +, [ +Germany +: +Hessen +]; designated by + +Ebmer (1975: 235) + +; SGNF. + + + +Published data. +Dathe 1980: 211 +(Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic); +Chenikalova 2005: 26 +( +Stavropol +Territory). + + + + +Material examined. + +RUSSIA +. + +Krasnodar +Territory + +: +8 ♀ +, +Slavyanskiy +, + +on + +Onobrychis sativa + + +, + +29. +V + +.1938, VR; + + +10 ♀ +, +1 ♀ +, +Slavyanskiy +, + +on + +Melilotus officinalis + + +, + +15. +VI + +.1938, VR + +; + +4 ♀ +, idem + +on + +Convolvulus arvensis + + +, + +17. +VI + +.1938, VR + +; + +4 ♀ +, idem, + +on + +Vicia sativa + + +, + +22. +VI + +.1938, VR + +; + +9 ♀ +, idem, + +on + +Cichorium intybus + + +, + +2.VIII.1938 + +, VR; + + +1 ♂ +, +Krasnodar +, + +30. +VI + +.1946, +Voloshina +; + + +7 ♀ +, +6 ♂ +, +Sochi +, +Lasarevskaya +, VII-VIII.1952, VR + +; + +idem, +8 ♀ +, + +24. +V + +.1973, VT + +; + +5 ♀ +, +2 ♂ +, idem, VI-VII.1974, VT; + + +5 ♀ +, idem, + +18.IV.1975 + +, VT; + + +19 ♀ +, idem, no date, +Lisenko +; +10 ♀ +, near +Sochi +, + +16. +VI + +.1957, +Garnovskaya +; + + +1 ♀ +, +Krasnaya Polyana +, + +1.VII.1990 + +, +Yakovlev +; + + +4 ♀ +, +2 ♂ +, + +20 km +WSW of Pavlovskaya + +, +Chelbas River +, meadow, + +11.VIII.1990 + +, YP; + + +4 ♀ +, +Goryachiy Kluch distr. +, +Suzdalskaya +, +44°45′N +39°22′E +, 7, + +13.VIII.2011 + +, +YA +; + + + +Stavropol +Territory + +: +1 ♀ +, +Kislovodsk +, + +1. +V + +.1949, VP; + + +4 ♀ +, idem, +Lermontov Rock +, meadow, forest, + +29.IV.2018 + +, +SB +; + + +4 ♀ +, +11 ♂ +, +16 km +NW of +Stavropol +, +Pelagiada +, + +29.VII.1981 + +, +O. Kovalev +; + + +10 ♀ +, + +10 km +NW of Spakovskoye + +, + +14.VII.1986 + +, +SB + +; + +1 ♀ +, +20 km +W of +Stavropol +, + +27.VII.1989 + +, +SB + +; + +24 ♀ +, +14 ♂ +, +Shpakovskoye +, + +1-5.VIII.1989 + +, +SB + +; + +2 ♀ +, +2 ♂ +, +15 km +W of +Stavropol +, + +600 m + +, steppe, + +5.VIII.1990 + +, YP + +; + + +Adygei Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Maykop +, + +V + +.1902, G. Shaposhnikov + +; + +1 ♀ +, idem, 1933, +Pogodina +; + + +8 ♀ +, +Shuntuk +, +Maykop +, + +21. +V + +–13.VII.1938, +Andreeva +; + + +2 ♀ +, +2 ♂ +, + +55 km +S of Maykop + +, +Belaya River +, + +550 m + +, meadow, forest, + +7.VIII.1990 + +, YP + +; + + +Karachayevo-Cherkess Republic + +: +7 ♀ +, +5 ♂ +, + +10 km +E of Karachayevsk + +, +Mara River +, + +1050 m + +, forest, meadow, steppe slope, + +2.VIII.1990 + +, YP + +; + + +Ingush Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Egochkal +near +Dzheyrakh +, + +7.VIII.1927 + +, +Kirichenko + +; + + +Kabardino-Balkarian Republic + +: +4 ♀ +, +33 ♂ +, + +5 km +N of Baksan + +, + +500 m + +, steppe, + +31.VII. 1990 + +, YP + +; + + +North Ossetian Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, +Ardon +, +Vladikavkaz +, + +27. IV.1900 + +, +Demokidov + +; + + +Chechen Republic + +: +5 ♀ +, +Borzoy +, + +10 km +SW of Shatoy + +, + +900 m + +, meadow, + +23.VII.1990 + +, YP + +; + + +Dagestan Republic + +: +1 ♀ +, + +1.5 km +SE of Pionernyi + +, +43°03′N +46°51′E +, + +28. +V + +.2019, +MP +, +VL + +; + +1 ♀ +, +5 km +NW of +Talgi +, +42°52′N +47°26′E +, + +31. +V + +.2019, +MP +, +VL + +; + +2 ♀ +, +5 km +SSW of +Rubas +, +41°52′N +48°16′E +, + +2. +VI + +.2019, +MP +, +VL + +; + +1 ♀ +, +Narat-Tube Range +, +42°56′N +47°23′E +, + +on + +Origanum vulgare + + +, + +11. +VI + +.2021, +S. Ivanov +; + + +4 ♀ +, +Kamyshchay River valley +, +41°54′N +48°13′E +, + +30. +V + +.2022, AF; + + +4 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, near +Gubden +, +42°34′N +47°33′E +, + +2. +VI + +.2022, AF + +; + +1 ♂ +, idem, + +14. +VI + +.2023, +MP + +; + +6 ♀ +, +Tsudakhar +, +42°19′N +47°09′E +, + +15. +VI + +.2023, +MP + +; + +1 ♀ +, +Dubki +, +43°01′N +46°56′E +, + +21. +VI + +.2023, +MP + +; + +1 ♀ +, +Arakani +, +42°36′N +46°59′E +, + +22. +VI + +.2023, +MP + +; + +1 ♀ +, +Tekipirkent +, +41°20′N +47°52′E +, + +29. +VI + +.2023, +MP + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Russia +(North Caucasus, east to Western Siberia); Europe, North Africa, +Israel +, +Turkey +, Caucasus, +Iran +, +Turkmenistan +. + + + + +Remarks. +A common species; in steppes, agricultural areas, and meadows of mountain and floodplain forests. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B8/3A/CA/B83ACA91AEAD5B55A644F4182DB64D3D.xml b/data/B8/3A/CA/B83ACA91AEAD5B55A644F4182DB64D3D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..36d1cec32bc --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B8/3A/CA/B83ACA91AEAD5B55A644F4182DB64D3D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,838 @@ + + + +A revision of the four Afrotropical and Palaearctic Sphyracephala Say (Diptera, Diopsidae) with an illustrated overview of the other five Sphyracephala + + + +Author + +Feijen, Hans R. +0000-0002-7265-8448 +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands + + + +Author + +Feijen, Frida A. A. +0000-0001-5872-8780 +ETH Zürich, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Integrative Biology (IBZ), 8092 Zürich, Switzerland & EAWAG, Aquatic Ecology, Dübendorf, Switzerland + + + +Author + +Feijen, Cobi +0000-0001-8756-3903 +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2025 + +2025-06-10 + + +1241 + + +1 +81 + + + +journal article +310381 +10.3897/zookeys.1241.151490 +b61e1f46-07df-41f0-84ab-1d49e78b9253 +E0BA0012-F063-43B8-926B-8DD47010D489 + + + + +Genus + +Sphyracephala +Say, 1828 + + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala + +Say, 1828 +: plate 52. + + +Osten +Sacken 1882: 234 + + +(morphology, catalogue); + +Brunetti 1907: 163 + +( +Oriental +, clustering); + +Bezzi 1922: 69 + +(world catalogue); + +Sen 1921: 33 + +( +Oriental +, ecology); + +Curran 1928: 274 + +(Afrotropical); + +Collart 1954: 329 + +(Afrotropical); + +Hennig 1941 a +: 59 + +, + +1941 b +: 3 + +(Palaearctic, morphology), 1965: 54 (phylogeny); + +Séguy 1955: 1123 + +(Afrotropical); + +Descamps 1957: 19 + +(Afrotropical, biology); + +van Bruggen 1961: 425 + +(Afrotropical); + +Lavigne 1962: 5 + +(Nearctic, biology); + +Steyskal 1972: 13 + +(world catalogue), 1977: 35 ( +Oriental +catalogue); + +Hochberg-Stasny 1985: 1 + +(Nearctic, biology); + +Peterson 1987: 785 + +(Nearctic, morphology); + +Feijen 1989: 66 + +(Nearctic and world, morphology); + +Papp et al. 1997: 137 + +(Palaearctic); + +Hilger 2000: 335 + +(Palaearctic, morphology); + +Meier and Hilger 2000: 6 + +(egg morphology); + +Meier and Baker 2002: 329 + +(phylogeny); + +O’Hara et al. 2011: 96 + +, 191 (synonyms); + +Feijen et al. 2017: 76 + +(Arabian Peninsula, biogeography, clustering); + +Nartshuk 2017: 128 + +(Palaearctic); + +Feijen and Feijen 2019: 39 + +( +Oriental +); + +Jackson 2019 + +: suppl. figs 1, 2 (phylogeny). + + + + + + + + + +Sphryracephala + +, +Westwood 1848: 37 +, pl. 18 fig. 3. + +Portschinsky 1871: 287 + +; + +Bigot 1874: 115 + +; + +Sen 1921: 33 + +. (Error for + +Sphyracephala + +). + + + + + + + + + +Hexechopsis + +Rondani, 1875: 442 +, type-species + +Diopsis beccarii + +Rondani, 1873 + + +, by original designation and monotypy. + + +Osten +Sacken 1882: 235 + + +; + +Brunetti 1907: 163 + +; + +Eggers 1916: 27 + +; + +1925: 482 + +; + +Bezzi 1922: 71 + +(as Hexecopsis); + +Shillito 1940: 148 + +; + + +Hennig 1941 b + +: 5 + +; + +Séguy 1949: 74 + +; + +van Bruggen 1961: 425 + +; + +Steyskal 1972: 13 + +; + +Cogan and Shillito 1980: 584 + +; + +Feijen 1989: 66 + +; + +Feijen et al. 2017: 76 + +. + + + + + + + + + +Zygocephala + +Rondani, 1875: 443 +, type-species + +Diopsis hearseiana + +Westwood, 1845 + + +, by original designation and monotypy (as + +Diopsis hearsejana +(Wiedemann )) + +. + + +Osten +Sacken 1882: 235 + + +(implicitly); + +Brunetti 1907: 163 + +; + +Shillito 1940: 148 + +; + +van Bruggen 1961: 425 + +; + +Steyskal 1972: 13 + +, + +1977: 35 + +; + +Feijen 1989: 66 + +; + +Feijen and Feijen 2019: 40 + +. + + + + + + + + + +Pseudodiopsis + +Hendel, 1917: 33 +, type-species + +Sphyracephala cothurnata + +Bigot, 1874 + + +, by original designation and monotypy. + +Malloch 1938: 437 + +; + +Shillito 1940: 150 + +; + +Hennig 1965: 62 + +(in Diopsini); + +Steyskal 1972: 12 + +(in Sphyracephalini); + +Feijen 1989: 66 + +(as synonym of + +Sphyracephala + +); + +Burkhardt and de la Motte 1996: 173 + +; + +Baker 1999: 24 + +, figs 1, 2 (as synonym); + +Meier and Hilger 2000: 32 + +(as synonym); + +Baker et al. 2001: 93 + +, fig. 1; + +Andersen 2001: 138 + +; + +Meier and Baker 2002: 334 + +; + +Jackson 2019 + +: suppl. fig. 1. + + + + + + + + +Sphyrocephala + + +[sic]: + +Curran 1934: 358 + +. + +Flint 1956: 44 + +; + +Stone 1980: 17 + +. + + + + + + + +Microdiopsis + +Curran, 1934: 359 +, type-species + +Sphyracephala cothurnata + +Bigot, 1874 + + +, by original designation and monotypy. + +Curran 1934: 495 + +(in the corrections); + +Malloch 1938: 437 + +; + +Shillito 1940: 148 + +; + +Steyskal 1972: 12 + +; + +Arnaud and Owen 1981: 144 + +. + + + + + + + + +Sphracephala + + + +[sic]: +Nayar and Tandon 1962 a +: 113, +1962 b +: 132, +1963: 1 +; +Singh et al. 1962: 79 +. + + + + + +Type species. + + + + + +Diopsis brevicornis +Say, 1817: 23 + + +, by monotypy. + + + + + + + + + +Prosternum, ventral view +1 +basiliform prosternum, ♂, + +Sphyracephala munroi + +, Arusha, Tanzania +2 +precoxal bridge, ♂, + +Sphyracephala beccarii +, Mboma, DR + +Congo. Scale bars: 0.1 mm. + + + + + + + +♀, sternite 8, ventral view +3 + +Sphyracephala munroi + +, Arusha, Tanzania +4 + +Sphyracephala beccarii + +, Maputo, Mozambique. Scale bars: 0.1 mm. + + + + +Key to the +<taxonomicName id="EC42B5D120D300CD63EAE22582E72E00" authorityName="Say" authorityYear="1828" class="Insecta" family="Diopsidae" genus="Sphyracephala" kingdom="Animalia" order="Diptera" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="genus"> +<emphasis id="CF9F6AA246C489F8A189271AEA7203C9" italics="true">Sphyracephala</emphasis> +</taxonomicName> + + + +Although this revision concentrates on the Afrotropical and Palaearctic + +Sphyracephala + +, the key covers all described species. It should be stressed that in the +Oriental +and Australasian Regions some species remain to be described. + +Sphyracephala detrahens + +and + +S. bipunctipennis + +also need to be redescribed, so couplet 8 will then be updated and extended. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
1 +Basiliform prosternum (Fig. +1 +); tergite 1 with semicircular groove; ♀ sternite 8 with 2 small sclerites located on the meson Fig. +3 +); presence of sclerotised ring of ventral vagina wall; surstylus without microtrichia. + +Sphyracephala brevicornis + +species group + +2 +
+Precoxal bridge (Fig. +2 +); tergite 1 with two longitudinal grooves; ♀ sternite 8 with 2 large, rectangular, plates, well separated on the meson Fig. +4 +); absence of sclerotised ring of ventral vagina wall; surstylus with microtrichia on outer side. + +Sphyracephala hearseiana + +species group + +6 +
2 +Distinct wing markings (Figs +82 +, +116 +) including apical wing spot and central wing band running from vein R 1 to posterior margin; eye span / body ratio: 0.38–0.44; sexual monomorphy with regard to eye span (D = 0.01–0.04); scutellar spine / scutellum ratio: 0.54–0.75; apical seta / scutellar spine ratio: 2.8–3.9 + +3 +
+None or vague wing markings (Figs +12 +, +59 +); if markings present, central spot running from below vein R 2 + 3 to posterior end of crossvein dm-m; eye span / body ratio: 0.52–0.67; sexual dimorphy with regard to eye span (D = 0.33–0.39); scutellar spine / scutellum ratio: 0.41–0.44; apical seta / scutellar spine ratio: 5.4–6.1 + +5 +
3 +Central wing band proximally extending to crossvein r-m and from there to vein R 1 creating pale anterior wing spot (Fig. +82 +); inner side of fore femur brown with darker apical half; surstyli articulate, elongate (Figs +94 +, +95 +, +l / w +ratio: 4.7); Far Eastern Siberia, North-Eastern China + + +Sphyracephala nigrimana + +
+Central wing band proximally just extending to crossvein r-m (Figs +116 +, +121 +); inner side of fore femur almost uniformly blackish brown or brown with broad transverse darker band; surstyli fused to epandrium; surstyli oblong ( +l / w +ratio: ~ 1.9–2.2); Canada, USA + +4 +
4 +Distinct apical wing spot, vague infuscation posterior to base of subcostal cell (Fig. +116 +); fore femur with two rows of spinous bristles, uniformly blackish brown with pale base and apex; +l / w +ratio of fore femur ~ 2.66; surstylus oblong in lateral view + + +Sphyracephala brevicornis + +
+Only slight infuscation at wing apex, distinct spot posterior to base of subcostal cell (Fig. +121 +); fore femur with one row of spinous bristles, yellowish brown with brown spots; +l / w +ratio of fore femur ~ 2.43; surstylus oblong to spatula-shaped (depending on angle of view) in lateral view + + +Sphyracephala subbifasciata + +
5 +Overall clothed in sparse, small white setulae; small eye span (1.7–2.2 mm) in ♀ and ♂ (respectively, ~ 52 % and ~ 60 % of body lengths); wing almost transparent with vague brown central and apical spots; +l / w +ratio of fore femur 2.7–2.9; inner side of fore femur with centrally a broad, dark transverse band; ♀ cerci rather elongate, +l / w +ratio: ~ 3.2, remarkably curled upward; surstyli rectangular, +l / w +ratio: ~ 1.5–1.7; Balkan and Caucasus regions + + +Sphyracephala babadjanidesi + +
+Overall clothed in long dark setulae; small eye span (2.5–2.7 mm) in ♀ and ♂ (respectively ~ 61 % and ~ 67 % of body length); wing transparent, without spots; +l / w +ratio of fore femur 3.4–3.9; inner side of fore femur with dark fine, longitudinal stripe on central third; ♀ cerci elongate, +l / w +ratio: ~ 4.6, not curled upward; surstyli elongate, +l / w +ratio: ~ 2.8; Afrotropical Region + + +Sphyracephala munroi + +
6Large inner vertical setae; transparent wing without spots; vein M 4 normally extending beyond crossvein dm-m; pale, whitish scutellar spines; scutellar spine / scutellum ratio: 0.48–0.56; apical seta / scutellar spine ratio: 3.60–3.91; articulate surstyli +7 +
Inner vertical setae absent; wing with large brown apical wing spot (~ 40 % of wing length) and large central spot; vein M 4 not extending beyond crossvein dm-m; dark scutellar spines; scutellar spine / scutellum ratio: 0.88–1.15; apical seta / scutellar spine ratio: 2.50–2.93; surstyli fused to epandrium with suture visible +8 +
7 +Epandrium semi-circular with square posterior corners (Fig. +132 +); surstyli posteriorly directed, slender, sickle-shaped, strongly tapering towards apex (Fig. +133 +); sternite 7 with peculiar small invagination anteromedially (see +Kumar 1978 b +: fig. 2); ♀ cercus with +l / w +ratio: ~ 2.5 + + +Sphyracephala hearseiana + +
+Epandrium almost circular (Fig. +48 +); surstyli medially directed, apices almost touching, apically acute with an upturned apex (Fig. +49 +); ♀ sternite 7 without invagination anteromedially; ♀ cercus with +l / w +ratio: ~ 1.9 + + +Sphyracephala beccarii + +
8 +Dark apical wing spot in cell r 4 + 5 proximally extending to halfway the cell (Fig. +138 +); central crossband quite narrow, in cell r 4 + 5 ~ 1 / 7 of cell length; apical wing spot marginally linked to central wing band along veins M 1 and R 4 + 5; very pale preapical wing band almost uninterrupted and striking; dark apex of fore femur on dorsal side extending to ~ 25 % of femur length + + +Sphyracephala detrahens + +
+Dark apical wing spot in cell r 4 + 5 proximally extending to almost crossvein dm-m (Fig. +147 +); central crossband quite broad, in cell r 4 + 5 ~ 1 / 4 of cell length apical wing spot broadly linked to central wing band along veins M 1 and R 4 + 5; pale preapical wing band interrupted giving three pale spots with a vague central one in cell r 4 + 5; dark apex of fore femur on dorsal side extending to ~ 40 % of femur length + + +Sphyracephala bipunctipennis + +
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/C5/11/DB/C511DB947BD653C8868D7525FAFC0BA3.xml b/data/C5/11/DB/C511DB947BD653C8868D7525FAFC0BA3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..55029035bdb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/C5/11/DB/C511DB947BD653C8868D7525FAFC0BA3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,958 @@ + + + +A revision of the four Afrotropical and Palaearctic Sphyracephala Say (Diptera, Diopsidae) with an illustrated overview of the other five Sphyracephala + + + +Author + +Feijen, Hans R. +0000-0002-7265-8448 +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands + + + +Author + +Feijen, Frida A. A. +0000-0001-5872-8780 +ETH Zürich, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Integrative Biology (IBZ), 8092 Zürich, Switzerland & EAWAG, Aquatic Ecology, Dübendorf, Switzerland + + + +Author + +Feijen, Cobi +0000-0001-8756-3903 +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2025 + +2025-06-10 + + +1241 + + +1 +81 + + + +journal article +310381 +10.3897/zookeys.1241.151490 +b61e1f46-07df-41f0-84ab-1d49e78b9253 +E0BA0012-F063-43B8-926B-8DD47010D489 + + + + + +Sphyracephala nigrimana +Loew, 1873 + + + + + +Figs 78–79 +, +80–82 +, +83–87 +, +88–93 +, +94–99 +, +100 +, +105 +, +106 +, +107 +, +108 +, +109 +, +110 +, +112 +, +Tables 2 +, +3 + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala nigrimana + +Loew, 1873: 103 +. + + +Osten +Sacken 1882: 235 + + +; + +Bezzi 1922: 69 + +; + +Lindner 1925: 167 + +; + +Brunetti 1928: 273 + +; + +Frey 1928: 70 + +; + +Hennig 1941 a +: 59 + +, 62, fig. 10 b (scutellar spine indicated as from type), 1941 b: 7, figs 5, 7; + +Steyskal 1972: 13 + +; + +Yang and Chen 1988: 142 + +; + +Feijen 1989: 67 + +; + +Yang and Chen 1998: 474 + +; + +Hilger 2000: 340 + +; + +Simova-Tošić and Stojanović 2000: 149 + +; + +Nartshuk 2003: 179 + +, pl. 44 fig. 12, 2017: 129; + +Sidorenko 2004: 456 + +, fig. 228; + +Hua 2006: 158 + +; + +Mader 2017: 108 + +; + +Feijen et al. 2018: 206 + +. + + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala brevicornis + +(Say): + +Portschinsky 1871: 287 + +, “ dans les environs de Vladivostok ” [near Vladivostok, +Russia +]. + +Loew 1873: 103 + +; + +Bezzi 1922: 69 + +; + +Hennig 1941 b +: 7 + +; + +Nartshuk 2017: 129 + +. + + + + + + + +Non + +Sphyracephala nigrimana + +: + +Liu 2009: 67 + +, figs 3 e, 36, +1 ♂ +, Hongmao Village, Yuanmen, Baisha, +Hainan +, +19. x. 2007 +, Yang Ding. + + + + + + +Type series. + + +Russia +: multiple specimens, Nebenfluß des +Amur +[side river of the +Amur +], A. Fedtschenko [Alexei Pavlovich Fedchenko, 1844–1873]. +Hennig (1941 b +) studied several specimens designated as + +S. nigrimana +Loew + +in the Loew Collection ( + +ZMHB + +). Although these specimens carried no location information, Hennig stated they could perhaps be considered “ Typen ” (types). According to Sven Marotzke ( + +ZMHB + +, pers. comm., 2024) +five specimens +could be found: two pins with each +one specimen +glued to a card, and one pin with +three specimens +glued to a card. All three cards carried the information “ Coll. Loew ”. In addition, on one card with a single specimen was written “ + +Sphyracephala nigrimana +Loew + +”, while on the card with +three specimens +was added “ Post Dubinskiy +23. iii. 1870 +”. Two microscopic slides were also found labelled “ innerer Kopul. - App. ” [inner genital structure] and “ Hypopygium ” [epandrium]. There can be no doubt that these specimens represent the flies studied and illustrated by +Hennig (1941 b +: figs 2, 5 A, 7) and that the slides were made by him. The information “ Post Dubinskiy, +23. iii. 1870 +” is new. The collecting date looks reliable and fits the time line. The location Post Dubinskiy could not be traced. + + + + +Material studied. + + + +Russia +: +1 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, зап. Кедровая Падь., Приморье Городков + +19.x.1968 + +, Усадода (?) На стене ( + +RMNH + +) [Primorye ( +Primorsky Krai +- region), +Kedrovaya Pad Nature Reserve +( +Korean Pine Valley Reserve or Cedar Reserve +), on the wall, + +43°05'N +, +131°30'E + +, + +40–700 m + + +, +19.x.1968 +, Gorodkov]. Kiril Borissovich Gorodkov (1932–2001) was a Russian entomologist. + + + + +Diagnosis. + + + +Sphyracephala nigrimana + +can be recognised by the following set of characters: central head brown, thorax and abdomen blackish; clothed in small setulae; head subtriangular in anterior view; eye stalk very short, very stout (~ 1.1 × the widest sagittal eye diameter); very small eye span in + +and + +, ~ 39 % of body length; assumed sexual monomorphy with regard to eye span; rectangular basiliform prosternum with medial groove; apical seta / scutellar spine ratio: ~ 3.0; scutellar spine / scutellum ratio: ~ 0.7; small, pale scutellar spines ~ +0.21 mm +; transparent wing with pattern of dark brown spots including apical spot, central crossband and basal spots; brown fore femur with apical half darker brown, strongly incrassate ( +l / w +ratio: 2.7–2.9), with two rows of spinous setae (more transparent on outer side); tergite 1 with distinct transverse ridges and vague circular groove, tergite 2 anteriorly with small triangle with transverse ridges; intersternite 1-2 a broad band, laterally connected to main sternite 2; + +tergite 7 with 2 small, laterally located, sclerites; + +sternite 7 forming 2 small, rounded sclerites with posterior extensions; + +cerci rather elongate, +l / w +ratio: ~ 3.3; + +sternite 8 forming 2 large rectangular sclerites; well-developed sclerotised ring, triangular to rounded; surstyli articulate, ventrally directed, parallel-sided, +l / w +ratio: ~ 4.7, on medial side scope-like, no microtrichia, inner and outer side clothed in setulae. + +Sphyracephala nigrimana + +comes closest to the two Nearctic + +Sphyracephala + +. + + + + +Redescription. + + +The following redescription considers the original description by +Loew (1873) +, descriptions by +Hennig (1941 a +, +b +) and illustrations by +Nartshuk (2003) +and +Sidorenko (2004) +. In his description, Loew especially indicated the differences with the Nearctic + +S. brevicornis + +. + + +Measurements +. Body length + +3.97 mm +, + +4.03 mm +; eye span + +1.52 mm +, + +1.59 mm +; wing length + +2.99 mm +, + +3.11 mm +; length of scutellar spine + +0.22 mm +, + +0.20 mm +(Tables +2 +, +3 +). +Loew (1873) +only indicated that + +S. nigrimana + +was of the same size as + +S. brevicornis + +, but that the eye span was smaller. +Feijen (1989) +gave for + +S. brevicornis + +a mean length of body of +4.41 mm +for + +and +4.25 mm +for + +, while the mean eye span came to +1.93 mm +in + +and +1.88 mm +in + +. This agrees with Loew’s observation about the relatively smaller eye span in + +S. nigrimana + +. The drawing by +Hennig (1941 b +: fig. 2 )) indicates a body length of +3.44 mm +and an eye span of +1.37 mm +for an unsexed fly. +Sidorenko (2004) +gives a body length of +3.5–4.2 mm +. + + +Head +. Subtriangular in anterior view (Figs +80 +, +81 +); central head dark brown (Figs +78 +– +81 +), stalks blackish, below the inner vertical setae and laterally of the antennae small yellowish brown spots; face thinly pruinose (Figs +80 +, +81 +) with laterally some whitish setulae; frons (Figs +80 +, +81 +) and ocellar tubercle thinly pollinose; arcuate groove distinct, narrow and blackish; facial sulcus shallow and indistinct, no facial teeth, lateroventral corners of face rectangular; clypeus more yellowish brown and more glossy; occiput glossy ventrally of ocellar tubercle, some white setulae dorsally and ventrally (Figs +79 +, +80 +); eye stalk very stout, ~ 1.05–1.10 × the widest sagittal eye diameter; eye span very small (Table +2 +) in both female (38.3 % of body length) and male (39.5 % of body length), +Hennig’s (1941 b +) drawing shows a ratio of 39.8 % for an unknown sex; the two data points for eye span / body length (Figs +100 +, +105 +, +106 +) are just below the allometric lines for + +S. brevicornis + +and + +S. subbifasciata + +, so it appears most likely that + +S. nigrimana + +is also a monomorphic species; inner and outer vertical setae long, close to +0.5 mm +, approx. equal in length to diameter of eye stalk (Figs +80 +, +81 +). + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala nigrimana +, Kedrovaya Pad + +, Russia +78 +♀, habitus, dorsolateral view +79 +♂, habitus, ventrolateral view. Scale bars: 1 mm. + + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala nigrimana +, Kedrovaya Pad + +, Russia +80 +♀, head, anterior view +81 +♂, head, anterior view +82 +♂, wing. Scale bars: 0.5 mm. + + + +Thorax +. Collar black, pruinose with laterally tiny glossy spots; scutum and scutellum uniformly black, pruinose (Fig. +78 +), scutellar spines pale but darker basally and apically, covered with tiny setulae (Figs +78 +, +79 +, +84 +); scutum and scutellum clothed with small blackish setulae; pleura dark black, largely pruinose, glossy sections (Fig. +79 +) include anepisternum and anepimeron (except for posterior edge of anepisternum and dorsal edge of both sclerites), katepisternum (except dorsoposteriorly) and meron (except dorsal and posterior edges); posterior notopleural seta and infra-alar seta long (Fig. +79 +), infra-alar seta slightly larger than posterior notopleural seta, supra-alar carina just visible; basiliform prosternum large, rectangular, with medial groove, prosternum laterally close to propleuron but clearly distinct; scutal length / scutal width ratio: 1.0; scutellum trapezoid; scutellar spines very small, straight, almost aligned with dorsal plane of scutellum, diverging at angle of ~ 75 °; scutellar spine / scutellum (Table +3 +) ratio: +0.75 in + +and +0.65 in + +; scutellar spine / length of body ratio: +0.055 in + +and +0.051 in + +; apical seta / scutellar spine ratio: +3.22 in + +and +2.82 in + +; scutellar length / scutellar width (at base) ratio: +0.63 in + +and +0.72 in + +. + + +Wing +. Almost transparent with distinct pattern of dark brown spots (Figs +78 +, +79 +, +82 +); apex with small spot in cells r 2 + 3 and r 4 + 5; central irregular crossband running from anterior margin to posterior margin near M 4; crossband darker anteriorly in cells r 1 and r 2 + 3, broadens strongly proximally in cell r 4 + 5 to include crossvein r-m, and narrows posteriorly around crossvein dm-m; from crossvein dm-m a small band runs anteriorly to cell sc; a spot centrally in cell bm + dm along vein M 4; a vague spot in cell m 4 distally of vein CuA + CuP; alula vaguely brown infuscated; vein CuA + CuP from vein CuP onward extending under angle of 30 ° to halfway wing margin in slightly curved line; vein M 4 continuing distal of crossvein dm-m to less than halfway wing margin; cell cua subrectangular (Fig. +82 +); crossvein h indistinct; glabrous area only includes small basal spot in cell br. + + + +Legs +. + +Fore coxa and trochanter brown, thinly pruinose on inner side, with some whitish setulae; fore femur (Figs +83 +, +85 +) brown, irregularly dark brown on distal half of inner side, thinly pruinose dorsally and on inner side, clothed in dark setulae; fore tibia and tarsus blackish brown, hence the specific epithet + +nigrimana + +(Figs +79 +, +85 +), thinly pruinose and with rows of blackish setulae; mid and hind legs brown, femora with dark brown spots on distal third of inner and outer side, tibiae darker brown; fore femur strongly incrassate, +l / w +ratio: +2.9 in + +and +2.7 in + +(Table +2 +), two rows of spinous setae on distal half with 6.0 ± 0.0 setae ( +n += 4), inner row with 4.0 ± 0.0 setae and outer row with 2.0 ± 0.0 setae, two rows of tubercles on distal five-sixth with 52.8 ± 0.6 tubercles ( +n += 4), inner row with 25.3 ± 0.3 ( +n += 4) tubercles and outer row with 27.5 ± 0.5 ( +n += 4) tubercles. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala nigrimana +, Kedrovaya Pad + +, Russia +83 +♂, fore femur, inner view +84 +♂, scutellar spine, apical bristle +85 +♂, fore leg, outer view +86 +♀, abdomen, dorsal view +87 +♀, abdomen, ventral view. Scale bars: 0.5 mm ( +86, 87 +); 0.2 mm ( +83–85). + + + +Preabdomen +. Tergites (Fig. +86 +) uniformly glossy, blackish brown, with scattered tiny white setulae, setulae laterally longer, darker and more dense; tergite 1 with distinct transverse ridges and vague, shallow circular groove, tergite 2 anteromedially with small triangle with transverse ridges; suture between tergites 1 and 2 distinct; sternites 1–6 glossy, dark brown, all covering the width of the abdomen, well covered with dark setulae; sternites 1 and 2 trapezoid (Figs +87 +, +92 +), sternite 1 glossy with a few small setulae, sternite 2 glossy, clothed in small setulae, intersternite 1-2 a solid, slender, darker sclerite, laterally broadening and connected to main sternite 2 (Fig. +92 +); sternites 3, 4 and 5 rectangular sclerites, sternite 3 as long as sternites 4 and 5 together; + +sternite 6 (Fig. +88 +) consisting of two rectangular sclerites well separated on the meson; + +sternite 6 (Fig. +99 +) represented by two small semi-circular sclerites, medially located. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala nigrimana + +, ♀, Kedrovaya Pad, Russia +88 +postabdomen, ventral view +89 +tergite 8, 10 and cerci, dorsal view +90 +sclerotised ring +91 +subanal plate, ventral view +92 +sternite 1, intersternite 1-2 and sternite 2, ventral view +93 +spermathecae. Scale bars: 0.2 mm ( +92 +); 0.1 mm ( +88–91, 93 +). + + + +Female postabdomen +. Postabdomen narrow (Fig. +88 +); tergite 6 represented by two elongate, laterally located, sclerites; tergite 7 represented by two small, laterally located, sclerites; tergite 8 two elongate, pruinose sclerites, well separated on the meson (Fig. +89 +); tergum 10 short, triangular, thinly pruinose, one pair of apical setulae; cerci rather elongate, +l / w +ratio: ~ 3.3, clothed in microtrichia and setulae; sternite 7 consisting of two small, rounded, anteriorly located sclerites with long, narrow, less sclerotised posterior extensions (Fig. +88 +); spiracle +7 in +membrane; sternite 8 represented by two large rectangular sclerites, separated on the meson, (Fig. +88 +), clothed in microtrichia and 12 pairs of setulae; subanal plate (Fig. +91 +) pentagonal with posterior corners rounded, apically with three pairs of long setulae, clothed in microtrichia and a few pairs of small setulae; spermathecae (Fig. +93 +) mushroom-shaped with inner structure large, striated, basally broadening cone-shaped, hollow and well sclerotised; sclerotised ring of ventral vagina, well developed, triangular to rounded, anterior side narrow (Fig. +90 +). + + +Male postabdomen +. Syntergosternite 7 + 8 slender, on both sides extending to the venter, (Fig. +98 +), spiracles +7 in +membrane; epandrium (Fig. +94 +) rounded, clothed in microtrichia and ~ 25 pairs of setulae; surstyli (Figs +95 +, +96 +) articulate, +l / w +ratio: ~ 4.7, almost parallel-sided, apically rounded, ventrally directed, on inner medial side hollow (scoop-like), no microtrichia, outer and inner sides clothed in setulae (Fig. +96 +); surstyli interconnected via slender processus longi; cerci rounded on lateral sides, length / broadest width ratio: 4.0, clothed in microtrichia and ~ 15 setulae; phallapodeme (lost during preparation) with slender anterior arm, lateral processes slender; ejaculatory apodeme straight, slender, apically ~ 3 × as broad as basally (Fig. +97 +), ejaculatory sac normal-sized. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala nigrimana + +, ♂, Kedrovaya Pad, Russia +94 +epandrium, cerci, surstyli, posterior view +95 +surstylus, outer view +96 +surstylus, inner view +97 +ejaculatory apodeme + sac +98 +syntergosternite 7 + 8, anterior view +99 +sternite 8. Scale bars: 0.1 mm. + + + + + +Biology. + + +The only observations on the biology of + +S. nigrimana + +are by +Nartshuk (2017) +. She mentioned that the species is characterised by gregarious behaviour. More than +150 specimens +were collected in one day in the Suputinsky Nature Reserve. They were found to be active from April to the end of October, while adults were assumed to hibernate. +Mader (2017) +mentions for + +S. nigrimana + +the antipodal position during copulation. All (also photographical) records for + +Sphyracephala + +and other diopsids show an epipodal position during copulation (e. g., +Hochberg-Stasny 1985 +: figs 24–32). As, in addition, + +S. nigrimana + +was listed under European +Diptera +, this record by Mader can better be disregarded. + + + + +Distribution. + + +The type series originated from a tributary of the +Amur +River in +Russia +( +Loew 1873 +). +Bezzi (1922) +, +Hennig (1941 b +), and +Nartshuk (2017) +all agreed that the flies from the vicinity (~ + +43°08'N +, +131°55'E + +) of Vladivostok and identified by +Portschinsky (1871) +as + +S. brevicornis + +belonged to + +S. nigrimana + +. +Hennig (1941 b +) also recorded + +S. nigrimana + +from “ der Mandschurei ” ( + +ZMHB + +). According to +Pont and Ackland (2009) +, this locality is in +Heilongjiang +, +China +. +Yang and Chen (1988) +and +Hua (2006) +repeated this Chinese record without additional comments. +Nartshuk (2017) +specified that + +S. nigrimana + +is distributed in the Primorsky Territory to the north up to the Bikin-Belimbe line (up to ~ +46°48'N +). She also mentions specimens from the Suputinsky Nature Reserve (~ + +43°40'N +, +132°30'E + +). +Dubatolov (2020) +reported on the presence of + +S. nigrimana + +in the more northern Bolshekhekhtsirsky Reserve ( + +48°17'N +, +132°49'E + +) near the Amur River. Flies were observed on the sunny wooden wall of the reserve office on +21. x. 2020 +, +29. ix. 2021 +and +14. x. 2021 +[sic]. + + +Liu (2009) +listed +one ♂ + +S. nigrimana + +from +Hainan +, +China +. From the same island he also recorded the Nearctic + +S. brevicornis + +. However, both records are based on misidentifications as can be verified, for instance, from the wing drawings. Biogeographically, these records would also have been highly unlikely. + + +The northern latitude limits of the Nearctic and Palaearctic + +Sphyracephala + +are quite consistent. The Nearctic species reach in +Canada +47°36'N +for + +S. subbifasciata + +and +45°30'N +for + +S. brevicornis +( +Feijen 1989 +) + +. The most northern record for + +S. babadjanidesi + +is found in +Hungary +with +46°41'N +, while for + +S. nigrimana + +the northern limit in +Russia +comes to +48°17'N +. Hibernation is found in all four Holarctic species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/E9/6B/D8/E96BD8502F0B54A78E2E351AA8552A35.xml b/data/E9/6B/D8/E96BD8502F0B54A78E2E351AA8552A35.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..54c80825b7b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/E9/6B/D8/E96BD8502F0B54A78E2E351AA8552A35.xml @@ -0,0 +1,2569 @@ + + + +A revision of the four Afrotropical and Palaearctic Sphyracephala Say (Diptera, Diopsidae) with an illustrated overview of the other five Sphyracephala + + + +Author + +Feijen, Hans R. +0000-0002-7265-8448 +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands + + + +Author + +Feijen, Frida A. A. +0000-0001-5872-8780 +ETH Zürich, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Integrative Biology (IBZ), 8092 Zürich, Switzerland & EAWAG, Aquatic Ecology, Dübendorf, Switzerland + + + +Author + +Feijen, Cobi +0000-0001-8756-3903 +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2025 + +2025-06-10 + + +1241 + + +1 +81 + + + +journal article +310381 +10.3897/zookeys.1241.151490 +b61e1f46-07df-41f0-84ab-1d49e78b9253 +E0BA0012-F063-43B8-926B-8DD47010D489 + + + + + +Sphyracephala babadjanidesi +Zaitzev, 1919 + + + + + +Figs 5 +, +6, 7 +, +8–11 +, +12, 13 +, +14–17 +, +18–23 +, +24–28 +, +29–31 +, +32 +, +105 +, +106 +, +107 +, +108 +, +109 +, +110–112 +, +Tables 1 +, +2 +, +3 +, +4 + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala babadjanidesi + +Zaitzev, 1919: 3 +(in Russian), 5 (in English), fig. 1. + +Hennig 1941 a +: 60 + +, + +1941 b +: 6 + +, fig. 6 (repetition of Zaitzev’s description); + +Steyskal 1972: 13 + +; + +Feijen 1989: 67 + +; + +Papp et al. 1997: 137 + +; + +Hilger 2000: 340 + +; + +Simova-Tošić and Stojanović 2000: 149 + +; + +Nartshuk 2003: 179 + +, pl. 44, fig. 13, 2017: 128. + + + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala europaea + +Papp & Földvári, 1997: 138 +, figs 1–13. + +Simova-Tošić and Stojanović 2000: 149 + +, figs 1–5, table 1 (as + +S. europea + +[sic]); + +Hilger 2000: 338 + +, figs 7.1, 7.2; + +Földvári and Meier 2002: 71 + +; + +Carr et al. 2006 a +: 5 + +, figs 1 h, 2; + +Oosterbroek 2006: 130 + +, fig. 496; + +Carr 2008: 114 + +, fig. 1, table 1; + +Kotrba 2014: 98 + +, fig. on p. 99; + +Nartshuk 2017: 129 + +; + +KMNP 2018 +: 10 + +th +p. (unpaginated); + +Kutsarov and Hubenov 2019: 145 + +, figs 1–3); + +Jackson 2019: 61 + +, suppl. fig. 1, 2; + +Turista Magazin 2023 + +: unpag., fig. 4 / 6. Syn. nov. + + + + + + + + +Link. + + +https://www.flickr.com/search/?text=sphyracephala%20europaea +. + + + + +Type series. + + + + + +Sphyracephala babadjanidesi + + +. +Azerbaijan +: 6 + +syntypes + +( + +and + +), +Elizavetpol +[later Ganja, then Kirovabad, now +Ganja +], + +vi.1916 + +, + +vi.1917 + + +; type series lost according to +Nartshuk (2017) +, who designated a + + +neotype + +, + +, +Azerbaijan +, окр. Ганжи, р. Качкарка [okr. +Ganzhi +, r. +Kachkarka +, + +40°40'12"N +, +46°16'33"E + +], + +2.vii.1933 + +, +Lukyanovich +( + +ZIN + +) + +. Type location and the nearby +neotype +location are well into the Asian part of +Azerbaijan +. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala babadjanidesi + +, eye span plotted against body length. Most data points were supplied by A. Stojanović ( +NHMBEO +). These Serbian data were also used by +Simova-Tošić and Stojanović (2000) +. Data points for two Azerbaijan flies are marked in blue, while data points of four Hungarian flies are marked in black and white. + + + + +Sphyracephala europaea + +. +Hungary +: + +holotype + +, + +, +Szeged +, Maros-torok, magaspart [~ + +46°14'24"N +, +20°14'14"E + +~ +100 m +], +26. iv. 1997 +. + +Paratypes + +, +10 ♂ +, +7 ♀ +, same locality and date; +1 ♀ +, same locality, +16. x. 1996 +(all in + +HNHM + +). + + + + +Material examined. + + + +Azerbaijan +: +1 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, Болчалы ЮЗ Гянджи, Азербайджан, Лукъянович + +17.vii.1933 + +, + + +Sphyracephala babadjanides + + +[sic], det. +Nartshuk +( + +RMNH + +) [Bolchaly (= +Balchili +), sw +Ganja +, +Lukyanovich +, + +40°40'12"N +, +46°16'33"E + +, + +17.vii.1933 + +, ~ + +500 m + +] + +. +Azerbaijan +is mainly located in West Asia, but a small part (5 ½ districts) in the North is part of Europe as the Caucasus form the division between Eastern Europe and Western Asia. From 1920 to 1991, +Azerbaijan +was part of the Soviet Union ( +USSR +). Fyodor K. Lukyanovich (1904–1942) was a Russian entomologist. + +Hungary +: + +paratypes + +of + +S. europaea + +, +2 ♀ +, +2 ♂ +, +Szeged +, +Maros-Torok +, magaspart, + +26.iv.1997 + +, +Paulovics +and +Földvári +( + +HNHM + +) + +; + +Georgia +: 1?, +Kakheti +, +Signagi +, +Vakiri +, + +41°38'43.368"N +, +45°55'27.3"E + +[ + +390 m + +], + +17.vii.2024 + +, +S. Kiladze +(photographs, see +https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/229960704 +) + +. + + + + +Diagnosis. + + + +Sphyracephala babadjanidesi + +can be recognised by the following set of characters: head mainly blackish brown, face and anterior edge of frons brown; thorax and abdomen blackish; clothed in sparse, small white setulae; eye stalk very stout (~ 0.94–1.02 × the widest sagittal eye diameter); very small eye span (~ +1.7–2.2 mm +) in + +and + +(respectively ~ 52 % and ~ 60 % of body length); very low rate of dimorphism D = 0.39; rectangular basiliform prosternum; apical seta / scutellar spine ratio: 5.4–5.5; scutellar spine / scutellum ratio: +0.43 in + +and +0.41 in + +; very small, scutellar spines whitish but darker basally ~ +0.13 mm +; wing almost transparent with brown central and apical spots; fore femur brown with apical third blackish brown, inner side centrally with dark brown diagonal transverse band, strongly incrassate ( +l / w +ratio: 2.7–2.8), two rows of pale slender spinous setae, inner row with ~ 4.5 setae and outer row with ~ 4.0 hardly spinous setae; tergite 1 with distinct subcircular groove; intersternite 1-2 a solid, straight, rod-like sclerite, laterally linked to sternite 2; + +tergite 7 consisting of two anteriorly located, triangular sclerites; + +sternite 7 with anteriorly two subtriangular plates, posteriorly connected to two subrectangular plates; + +sternite 8 two large elongate sclerites; + +cerci rather elongate, +l / w +ratio: ~ 3.2, sharply tapering apically, remarkably curled upward; small sclerotised ring present; surstyli articulate, medially directed, subrectangular with slightly concave apical side, without microtrichia, clothed in setulae, diagonal ridge on basal half of inner side. + +Sphyracephala babadjanidesi + +belongs to the + +S. brevicornis + +species group and comes closest to + +S. munroi + +. + + + + +Redescription. + + +The following redescription considers the original descriptions by +Zaitzev (1919) +and +Papp et al. (1997) +, and especially also the description and illustrations by +Simova-Tošić and Stojanović (2000) +. Philipp Adamovich Zaitzev (1877–1957) was the founder of research on the insect fauna of the Caucasus. + + +Measurements +. +Zaitzev (1919) +studied +six specimens +and gave as length of body +3.7–4.2 mm +, eye span +2.2–2.5 mm +and wingspan +7–8 mm +. +Papp et al. (1997) +gave as length of body +3.48 mm +( +holotype + +), +3.10–3.50 mm +( +paratype +♂♂ +), +3.38–4.05 mm +( +paratype +♀♀ +); as wing length +3.13 mm +( +holotype +), +2.75–3.20 mm +( +paratype +♂♂ +), +3.05–3.65 mm +( +paratype +♀♀ +); and as eye span +2.20 mm +holotype +), +1.90–2.20 mm +( +paratype +♂♂ +) and +1.70–2.15 mm +( +paratype +♀♀ +). The best series of measurements were given in +Simova-Tošić and Stojanović (2000 +: table 1). However, measurements were given in μm and not, as stated, in mm, so values given must be divided by 1000 to get mm). Their most important measurements are body length + +3.92 mm +± +SE +0.05 (range 3.33–4.38, +n += 35), + +3.69 mm +± 0.04 (range 3.15–4.13, +n += 38), eye span + +2.05 mm +± 0.03 (range 1.68–2.28, +n += 35), + +2.21 mm +± 0.04 (range 1.75–2.83, +n += 38). We measured the two flies from +Azerbaijan +and +four paratypes +from +Hungary +. For comparison, relevant measurements are summarised in Table +1 +. All data points for body length and eye span are plotted in Fig. +5 +. The actual +Azerbaijan +measurements for the + +fit well with the measurements of Zaitzev, but the + +is clearly at the lower end of the size range (Fig. +5 +). In general, measurements for the three countries are well in agreement with each other (Table +1 +). + + + + + + +Measurements (mm) and ratios for + +S. babadjanidesi + +from Azerbaijan, Hungary (paratypes of + +S. europaea + +) and Serbia. The ♂ from Azerbaijan was very small. The Serbian measurements were supplied by Stojanović (pers. comm. 2024). + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ +Sphyracephala babadjanidesi + +AzerbaijanHungarySerbia
+n +11223538
Length of body3.903.164.00 ± 0.033.63 ± 0.153.92 ± 0.053.69 ± 0.04
Eye span2.081.692.18 ± 0.042.22 ± 0.122.05 ± 0.032.21 ± 0.04
Span / body ratio0.530.53 *0.55 ± 0.010.61 ± 0.010.52 ± 0.000.60 ± 0.01
Sc. sp. / scutellum0.480.470.47 ± 0.010.41 ± 0.010.42 ± 0.010.40 ± 0.01
+Apical seta / +sc. sp +. +5.004.894.83 ± 0.175.30 ± 0.105.35 ± 0.115.53 ± 0.10
Length of wing3.542.873.66 ± 0.003.29 ± 0.003.43 ± 0.043.20 ± 0.03
+Fore femur, +l / w +ratio +2.692.822.77 ± 0.032.82 ± 0.03
+
+ +* Eye span / body measures by Zaitzev 0.59 and 0.60 (unsexed, but can be assumed to be males). + + +Head +. Face and anterior edge of frons brown (Figs +6 +, +7 +, showing head of flies from +Azerbaijan +and +Hungary +); arcuate groove blackish brown; remainder of frons and stalks blackish brown, occiput brown but blackish medially (Figs +8 +, +9 +); head uniformly pruinose (Figs +6 +– +9 +), clothed in sparse white setulae; frons flat; face flat, no facial teeth, lateroventral corners rounded, facial sulcus absent, but ventral facial edges slightly turned upward medially; eye stalk very stout, ~ 0.94–1.02 × the widest sagittal eye diameter; eye span very small in both female (52.3 % ± +SE +0.2 % of body length, +n += 38) and male (59.7 % ± +SE +0.5 % of body length, +n += 41); a dimorphic species, rate of dimorphism very low D = 0.39 (Fig. +5 +, +105 +, +106 +, Table +2 +) [ +Carr et al. 2006 a +also indicated this species as mildly dimorphic]; inner vertical seta long, ~ +0.50 mm +, 1.3 × diameter of eye stalk; outer vertical seta long, ~ +0.35 mm +, 0.9 × diameter of eye stalk (Figs +6 +, +7 +). For additional figures of the head refer to +Zaitzev (1919 +: fig. 1 a), +Papp et al. (1997 +: figs 1–3) and +Simova-Tošić and Stojanović (2000 +: figs 1, 2 b, 2 c (antennae), 4 a, 4 b, 4 c). + + + + + + +Quantitative characters for + +Sphyracephala + +species: ratio eye span / body length and allometric line for eye span on body length, length / width ratio of fore femur. Species are arranged in species groups and subtaxa. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ +Sphyracephala + +-span / bodyallometric line +n +fore femur +n +
ratioslopedimorphism +l / w +ratio +range
+ +S. brevicornis + +0.43 ± 0.000.30 ± 0.010.042032.67 ± 0.022.62–2.726
0.44 ± 0.000.34 ± 0.02-1312.65 ± 0.062.59–2.712
+ +S. subbifasciata + +0.41 ± 0.000.27 ± 0.040.01322.431
0.43 ± 0.000.28 ± 0.07-162.431
+ +S. nigrimana + +0.38--12.861
0.40--12.731
+ +S. babadjanidesi + +0.52 ± 0.030.54 ± 0.030.39382.74 ± 0.032.69–2.803
0.60 ± 0.050.93 ± 0.06-412.82 ± 0.022.79–2.853
+ +S. munroi + +0.61 ± 0.000.74 ± 0.030.33403.63 ± 0.063.36–3.9010
0.67 ± 0.001.07 ± 0.06-403.63 ± 0.033.50–3.8310
+ +S. hearseiana + +0.51 ± 0.000.51 ± 0.020.05152.44 ± 0.022.30–2.5515
0.53 ± 0.000.56 ± 0.03-152.48 ± 0.022.37–2.6015
+ +S. beccarii + +0.49 ± 0.000.49 ± 0.020.07402.48 ± 0.022.40–2.6110
0.53 ± 0.000.56 ± 0.03-402.53 ± 0.032.42–2.8015
+ +S. detrahens + +0.63--13.061
+ +S. bipunctipennis + +0.49 ± 0.010.58 ± 0.15-43.46 ± 0.033.43–3.544
0.62--13.49 ± 0.133.36–3.622
+S. +nr + +detrahens + +, Solomon Islands +0.73 ± 0.010.97 ± 0.070.67143.11 ± 0.062.81–3.369
0.78 ± 0.011.63 ± 0.07-203.11 ± 0.032.96–3.2310
+S. +nr + +detrahens + +, Japan +0.73 ± 0.011.03 ± 0.06-63.19 ± 0.013.15–3.206
0.78 ± 0.021.40 ± 0.11-43.25 ± 0.023.20–3.294
+
+ + + + + + +Sphyracephala babadjanidesi + +, head, anterior view +6 +♀, sw Ganja, Azerbaijan +7 +♀, paratype + +S. europaea + +, Szeged, Hungary. Scale bars: 0.2 mm. + + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala babadjanidesi + +8 +, +9 +, +11 +♀, sw Ganja, Azerbaijan +8 +habitus, dorsal view +9 +habitus, lateral view +10 +♀, paratype + +S. europaea + +, abdominal apex with curved cerci, ventral view +11 +basiliform prosternum. Scale bars: 1.0 mm ( +8, 9 +); 0.2 mm ( +10 +); 0.1 mm ( +11 +). + + + +Thorax +. Collar and scutum uniformly black, pruinose (Figs +6 +, +7 +, +31 +), scutellum slightly more blackish brown, pruinose; scutellar spines whitish but darker basally, densely pruinose (Figs +8 +, +9 +); scutum and scutellum with sparse setulae; pleura dark black, largely pollinose, only katepisternum and ventral section of anepimeron glossy (Fig. +9 +); posterior notopleural seta long, infra-alar seta very long (Fig. +8 +), infra-alar seta more than twice longer than posterior notopleural seta ( +Simova-Tošić and Stojanović (2000) +give for the notopleural seta a length of ~ +0.29 mm +and for the infra-alar seta a length of ~ +0.67 mm +); supra-alar carina just visible; basiliform prosternum large, rectangular, with deep medial groove, prosternum laterally close to propleuron but distinct; scutal length / scutal width ratio: ~ 0.9; scutellum trapezoid; scutellar spines very small, straight, slightly turned upward, diverging at angle of ~ 50 °; scutellar spine / scutellum ratio: +0.43 in + +and +0.41 in + +(Table +3 +); scutellar spine / length of body ratio: +0.055 in + +and +0.051 in + +; apical seta / scutellar spine ratio: +5.4 in + +and +5.5 in + +; scutellar length / scutellar width (at base) ratio: +0.57 in + +and in + +. For additional figures of the thorax can be referred to +Simova-Tošić and Stojanović (2000 +: figs 3 e, 3 f, scutellum and postscutellum). + + + + + + +Quantitative characters for + +Sphyracephala + +species: ratio scutellar spine / scutellar length and ratio apical seta / scutellar spine. Species are arranged in species groups and subtaxa. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ +Sphyracephala + +-scutellar spine / scutellum +n +apical seta / scutellar spine +n +
ratioratio
+ +S. brevicornis + +0.65 ± 0.0362.82 ± 0.066
0.64 ± 0.0023.001
+ +S. subbifasciata + +0.5413.861
0.5413.861
+ +S. nigrimana + +0.7513.221
0.6512.821
+ +S. babadjanidesi + +0.43 ± 0.01285.36 ± 0.1320
0.41 ± 0.01405.50 ± 0.0935
+ +S. munroi + +0.43 ± 0.01106.10 ± 0.2210
0.44 ± 0.01106.11 ± 0.119
+ +S. hearseiana + +0.56 ± 0.01123.60 ± 0.099
0.55 ± 0.01103.71 ± 0.127
+ +S. beccarii + +0.48 ± 0.01153.91 ± 0.1015
0.53 ± 0.01103.85 ± 0.1110
+ +S. detrahens + +0.8812.931
1.10 ± 0.262 *2.641
+ +S. bipunctipennis + +1.02 ± 0.0242.50 ± 0.024
1.121--
+S. +nr + +detrahens + +Solomon Islands +0.98 ± 0.02102.85 ± 0.106
0.97 ± 0.02102.94 ± 0.106
+S. +nr + +detrahens + +Japan +0.90 ± 0.0162.38 ± 0.082
0.85 ± 0.0442.86 ± 0.144
+
+ + +* Both from +Sulawesi +, but perhaps not conspecific. + + + +Wing +. Almost transparent with brown central and apical spots (Figs +12 +, +13 +showing wing of flies from +Azerbaijan +and +Hungary +); apex with rounded spot in cells r 2 + 3 and r 4 + 5 just extending in cells r 1 and m 1; central irregular spot running from posterior end of crossvein dm-m to almost vein R 2 + 3, section in cell r 2 + 3 rounded, section in cell r 4 + 5 running from crossvein r-m to crossvein dm-m, section in cell bm + dm in anterodistal corner and along crossvein dm-m; vein CuA + CuP from vein CuP onward extending under angle of 45 ° to just past halfway wing margin in straight line; vein M 4 continuing distal of crossvein dm-m to almost three-quarters the wing margin; cell cua slightly broadening distally, apically rounded (Figs +12 +, +13 +); crossvein h distinct; glabrous area only includes tiny basal spot in cell br. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala babadjanidesi + +, wing +12 +♂, sw Ganja, Azerbaijan +13 +♀, paratype + +S. europaea + +, Szeged, Hungary. Scale bars: 0.5 mm. + + + + +Legs +. + +Fore coxa and trochanter brown, especially anteriorly pruinose, clothed in some white setulae; fore femur (Figs +14 +, +15 +showing femora of flies from +Azerbaijan +and +Hungary +) brown, apical third blackish brown on inner and outer side, inner side centrally with dark brown diagonal transverse band, thinly pruinose, sparsely clothed in small setulae; fore tibia dark brown, thinly pruinose; basitarsus dark brown, other tarsomeres brown (Figs +16 +, +17 +), thinly pruinose and with rows of blackish setulae; mid and hind legs brown, femora with darker brown apices, hind tibia with darker brown apex; fore femur strongly incrassate (Table +2 +), +l / w +ratio in +Azerbaijan + +2.69 and in +Azerbaijan + +2.82, +l / w +ratio in two + +S. europaea + +paratype + +from +Hungary +2.77 ± 0.03 (range 2.73–2.80) and in two + +S. europaea + +paratype + +2.82 ± 0.03 (range 2.79–2.85) [ +Papp et al. (1997) +stated that the fore femur in + +S. europaea + +is definitely thicker than in + +S. babadjanidesi + +and a major differential character. Basing themselves on +Zaitzev’s (1919) +drawing, they gave a ratio width / length for + +S. babadjanidesi + +of 27 / 75 (i. e., +l / w +ratio: 2.78). According to Papp et al., the ratio length / width in the +holotype +of + +S. europaea + +came to 2.41, while in the +paratype +females it was 2.44. However, the data at our disposal clearly show no difference in the ratio +l / w +between + +S. europaea + +and + +S. babadjanidesi + +.]; fore femur with two rows of pale spinous setae on distal two-thirds (Figs +14 +, +15 +), especially the setae on the outer site are very slender and hardly qualify as “ spinous ”, in total 8.5 ± +SE +0.2 setae ( +n += 10, range 8–9, + +and + +combined), inner row with 4.5 ± 0.2 ( +n += 10, range 4–5) setae and outer row with 4.0 ± 0.0 setae ( +n += 11, range 4); two rows of tubercles on distal three-quarters with in total 50.2 ± 0.4 tubercles ( +n += 10, range 48–52, + +and + +combined), inner row with 24.4 ± 0.3 ( +n += 10, range 23–26) tubercles and outer row with 25.5 ± 0.4 ( +n += 11, range 23–27) tubercles. +Simova-Tošić and Stojanović (2000 +: fig. 3 a) illustrated setae and tubercles on the fore femur. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala babadjanidesi + +14, 15 +fore femur, inner side +16, 17 +fore leg +14 +♀, sw Ganja, Azerbaijan +15 +♀, paratype + +S. europaea + +, Szeged, Hungary +16 +♀, outer side, sw Ganja, Azerbaijan +17 +♂, inner side, paratype + +S. europaea + +, Szeged, Hungary. Scale bars: 0.2 mm. + + + +Preabdomen +. Tergites (Fig. +8 +) blackish brown, thinly pruinose, small white setulae especially laterally; tergite 1 with very distinct subcircular groove and vague transverse ridges (Fig. +8 +, groove also shown in +Zaitzev (1919 +: fig. 1), +Papp et al. (1997 +: fig. 1), and +Simova-Tošić and Stojanović (2000 +: fig. 4 d, e); suture between tergites 1 and 2 very distinct; sternites 1–6 dark brown; sternites 1 and 2 glossy, clothed in small setulae (Fig. +18 +); other sternites thinly pruinose, sparsely clothed in small white setulae; sternite 1 short, trapezoid; intersternite 1-2 a solid straight rod-like sclerite, laterally linked to sternite 2 (Fig. +18 +); sternite 2 a slightly trapezoid plate; sternites 3–5 rectangular plates; sternite 6 (Fig. +19 +) somewhat curved, strongly sclerotised, anteromesally a non-sclerotised section. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala babadjanidesi + +, ♀, sw Ganja, Azerbaijan +18 +sternite 1, intersternite 1-2 and sternite 2, ventral view +19 +postabdomen, ventral view +20 +postabdomen, dorsal view +21 +subanal plate, ventral view +22 +sclerotised ring +23 +spermathecae. Scale bars: 0.5 mm ( +18 +); 0.2 mm ( +19, 20 +); 0.05 mm ( +21–23 +). + + + +Female postabdomen +. Postabdomen (Fig. +19 +) with “ normal ” shape, not long and narrow like + +S. munroi + +; tergite 7 represented by two glossy, well sclerotised, anteriorly located, triangular sclerites, just separated mesally (Fig. +20 +); tergite 8 two subrectangular, thinly pruinose, sclerites, separated on the meson; tergum 10 short, on the meson broader and posteriorly rounded, thinly pruinose, one pair of apical setulae; cerci curled upward, a striking feature clearly visible in both females from +Hungary +and +Azerbaijan +(Figs +9 +, +10 +; see also +Simova-Tošić and Stojanović 2000 +: fig. 4 i), rather elongate, +l / w +ratio: ~ 3.2, sharply tapering apically, clothed in microtrichia and setulae, apically 3 tiny spine-like setulae (Fig. +20 +); sternite 7 (Fig. +19 +; see also +Papp et al. 1997 +: fig. 10) with anteriorly two subtriangular, almost bare, plates well separated on the meson, posteriorly these plates are connected to two posterior subrectangular plates just separated on the meson, these latter plates pruinose and clothed in some setulae; spiracle +7 in +membrane; sternite 8 represented by two elongate sclerites, well separated on the meson (Fig. +19 +), pruinose and posteriorly with some setulae; subanal plate (Fig. +21 +) triangular to mitre-shaped with apically a tiny extension, pruinose, apex with one pair of longer setulae, ~ 9 pairs of setulae posteriorly; spermathecae (Fig. +23 +) mushroom-shaped with medium-sized, bell-shaped, hollow, more sclerotised, striated, inner structure, no protuberances, spermathecal ducts very short and broadening distally; sclerotised ring of ventral vagina (Fig. +22 +) small, anteriorly straight and posteriorly semi-circular, arms very slender. + + +Male postabdomen +. Syntergosternite 7 + 8 very slender and wide, weakly sclerotised; spiracles +7 in +membrane just anteriorly of syntergosternite; epandrium (Fig. +24 +) rounded, with a large mesal gap, clothed in microtrichia and ~ 10 pairs of setulae; surstyli articulate, +l / w +ratio: ~ 1.5–1.7, almost touching on the meson, (Figs +24–26 +), simple, subrectangular with slightly concave apical side, outer side (Fig. +25 +) without microtrichia, clothed in ~ 50 setulae, inner side (Fig. +26 +) with only 20 setulae and an almost diagonal ridge on basal half; surstyli interconnected via slender processus longi, processus broadening medially (Fig. +24 +); cerci slender, rather elongate, +l / w +ratio: 3.9, clothed in microtrichia and on apical half with ~ 10 setulae; phallapodeme (Fig. +28 +) with slender anterior arm, corners rounded, anterior arm 1.5 × longer than posterior arm, lateral processes broad; ejaculatory apodeme straight, slender but apically widening to twice its width (Fig. +27 +), ejaculatory sac normal-sized. +Papp et al. (1997 +: figs 4, 5, 8) give lateral views of the male genital complex, also illustrating the phallic complex with short male genital process. +Simova-Tošić and Stojanović (2000 +: fig. 5 a, b) likewise illustrate the lateral view of the male genital complex. + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala babadjanidesi + +, ♂, sw Ganja, Azerbaijan +24 +epandrium, cerci, surstyli, posterior view +25 +surstylus, outer view +26 +surstylus, inner view +27 +ejaculatory apodeme + sac +28 +phallapodeme. Scale bars: 0.1 mm ( +24, 27, 28 +); 0.05 mm ( +25, 26 +). + + +
+ + +Biology. + + +Zaitzev (1919) +reported that + +S. babadjanidesi + +was attracted by electric light in the evening. +Papp et al. (1997) +reported on hundreds of + +S. europaea + +in October on an overwintering site. Returning in April, the flies were there again, though in smaller numbers. +Paulovics (1998) +presented data on summer occurrences and distribution along the Hungarian Maros river as well as observations on its ethology. The fly preferred plain and sandy parts of the riverbank and avoided the zone covered by mud. Flies were found +0.5–1.5 m +from the river edge. On or near a dead frog, seven or eight + +Sphyracephala + +were found. A single fly was also found feeding on a dead ant. In a two-week period in October, the number of assembling flies increased from several to ~ 500. +Simova-Tošić and Stojanović (2000) +found a cluster of a few thousand flies of + +S. europaea + +in early November. Males and females occurred in approximately equal numbers. +Kutsarov and Hubenov (2019) +reported on clusters of thousands of flies in +Bulgaria +(see Figs +29 +, +30 +). +Nartshuk (2017) +noted the gregarious behaviour of + +S. babadjanidesi + +in +Azerbaijan +. She also noted that there were only small differences in the descriptions for + +S. babadjanidesi + +and + +S. europaea + +and that the study of type material would be necessary to determine their synonymy. +Papp et al. (1997) +and +Simova-Tošić and Stojanović (2000) +reported on +44 ♀♀ +and +55 ♂♂ +which would give a sex ratio of +1 ♀ +: 1.25 + +(Table +4 +). However, the latter authors stated that +♂♂ +and +♀♀ +occurred in equal numbers. + + + + + + +Sex ratios in + +Sphyracephala +species. + +Species are arranged in species groups and subtaxa. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Sphyracephala +n ♀ +n +♂ + +Ʃ +n +♀: ♂Source
+ +S. brevicornis + +1851193041.00: 0.64 +Feijen 1989 +
+ +S. subbifasciata + +5631871.00: 0.55 +Feijen 1989 +
+ +S. babadjanidesi + +(as + +europaea + +) +4455991.00: 1.25 1: 1 * +Papp et al. 1997 +Simova-Tošić and Stojanović 2000 +
+ +S. munroi + +3183076251.00: 0.97 +FBUB +, +NHRS +, +RMNH +
+ +S. hearseiana + +1717341.00: 1.00 1: 1 ** +RMNH +Sen 1921 +
+ +S. beccarii +, Afrotropical + +Continent +62263512571.00: 1.02 +RMNH +
+ +S. beccarii + +, Madagascar +5472858321.00: 0.52 +CAS +, +NMSA +, +CSCA +, +RMNH +
+ +S. bipunctipennis + +11415- +NHMUK +, TAU, +RMNH +
+ +S. detrahens + +, Sulawesi +14418- +NHMUK +, +RMNH +
+S. +nr + +detrahens + +, Japan +2473766231.00: 1.52 +Ôhara 1993 +, +1997 +, +RMNH +
+S. +nr + +detrahens + +, Solomon Islands +1529441.00: 1.93 +RMNH +
+S. +nr + +detrahens + +, Papua N. G. +167- +RMNH +
+
+ + +* +Simova-Tošić and Stojanović (2000) +: “ The swarm contained few thousands of males and females approximately in equal number. ” ** +Sen (1921) +: “ The mass consisted of flies of both sexes, in approximately equal numbers. ” + + + + + + + + +Sphyracephala babadjanidesi + +, live +29 +cluster of flies in cleft, Nikopol, Danube River, Bulgaria (photograph © Yordan Kutsarov) +30 +three flies, same data as for 29 +31 +fly showing fore femur, Szeged. Maros River, Hungary (photograph © Walter Pflieger). + + + +Laboulbeniales +(Ascomycota) have never been found on + +S. babadjanidesi + +, + +S. nigrimana + +, and the two Nearctic + +Sphyracephala + +. The long hibernation period might form the reason for this. +Rossi and Feijen (2018) +noted that +Laboulbeniales +are common on African +Diopsidae +, but considerably less common on +Oriental +Diopsidae +. In Afrotropical + +Sphyracephala + +Laboulbeniales +are very common, but in +Oriental + +Sphyracephala + +they are rare. It should be noted that the first fossil record of the order +Laboulbeniales +was found on a fossil diopsid + +Prosphyracephala + +in Baltic Amber ( +Rossi et al. 2005 +). +Grace and Carr (2020) +recorded for + +S. babadjanidesi + +(as + +europaea + +) 4 subfamilies of mariner transposons against none in + +S. beccarii + +. + +
+ + +Distribution. + + +The original type series for + +S. babadjanidesi +( +Zaitzev 1919 +) + +and its +neotype +( +Nartshuk 2017 +) all originate from the +Ganja Region +in the Asian part of +Azerbaijan +. The +neotype +forms part of a large collection ( + +ZIN + +) of more than +500 specimens +originating from almost the same place as the type series ( +Nartshuk 2017 +). In 2024, + +S. babadjanidesi + +was photographed in +Georgia +( +https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/229960704 +). The type series for + +S. europaea + +came from the Maros River in +Hungary +. This river is a tributary of the Tisza River which in its turn is the main tributary of the Danube. According to +Paulovics (1998) +, the species exists all along the Hungarian part of the Maros (Fig. +31 +). The species was later ( +KMNP 2018 +) recorded from the Körös-Maros Nemzeti Park in +Hungary +, near the border with +Romania +(~ + +46°41'23"N +, +21°10'28"E + +, ~ +80 m +). Rivers in this park are tributaries of the Tisza. Rahmé published pictures ( +https://www.flickr.com/photos/eurythyrea/5126015816 +) taken in Makó, +Csongrád +, +Hungary +( + +46°12'11"N +, +20°27'11"E + +, +83 m +). +Simova-Tošić and Stojanović (2000) +extensively reported on the presence of + +S. europaea + +in +Serbia +along the Danube, ca +2 km +from the mouth of the Tisza at Stari Slankamen ( + +45°9'5"N +, +20°14'44"E + +, ~ +100 m +) Stojanović (pers. comm.) observed the flies again on + +14. x. +2006 in + +the same locality. Early in the morning (8: 00 am) ~ +40 specimens +could be observed in the same hollow on the loess profile. Later, at around 4: 00 p. m., more than +200 specimens +were gathered in the same place, spread out over an area of ca +3 m +2 +. +Kutsarov and Hubenov (2019) +recorded + +S. europaea + +in +Bulgaria +, east of the town of Nikopol, next to the rocky monastery St. Stefan ( + +43°42'36"N +, +24°54'51"E + +, +60 m +) on the limestone rocks along the Danube River on the border with +Romania +. On the internet references for + +S. europaea + +in +Romania +can be found ( +https://www.flickr.com/photos/eurythyrea/5126015816 +). All locations for + +S. europaea + +are along the Danube River and its tributaries. +Papp et al. (1997) +stated “ that +Hennig (1941 b +) hypothesized the occurrence of + +Sphyracephala + +in South Europe including +Hungary +”. However, that view, also repeated in +Földvári and Meier (2002) +, cannot be deduced from Hennig’s paper. The various collecting localities and the +two type +localities are shown on the map (Fig. +32 +). In +Hungary +, this fly has a nature conservation status: collecting it carries a 10,000 HUF fine ( +Turista Magazin 2023 +). + + + + + + +Distribution map for records of + +Sphyracephala babadjanidesi + +(red dots). The yellow dot indicates the type locality of + +S. babadjanidesi + +, while the blue dot indicates the one for + +S. europaea + +. + + + + + +Remarks on synonymy. + + +Papp et al. (1997) +described + +S. europaea + +and declared it to be the first known species of the family +Diopsidae +in Europe. However, fossil species are well known from Europe. +Papp et al. (1997) +considered + +S. babadjanidesi + +the most closely related species to + +S. europaea + +. By mistake, they reported +Armenia +as type locality of + +S. babadjanidesi + +. Papp and Földvári (in +Papp et al. (1997) +), while describing + +S. europaea + +, had no access to specimens of + +S. babadjanidesi + +. They had to rely on the description and illustrations by +Zaitzev (1919) +, which for its time were certainly of a good standard. However, Zaitzev did not study the genitalia of + +S. babadjanidesi + +. Describing a closely related species, without access to flies from the type locality of + +S. babadjanidesi + +and without knowledge of genitalia morphology, is not a procedure to be recommended. + + +Papp et al. (1997) +list three “ features ” that are different between + +S. babadjanidesi + +and + +S. europaea + +. The first one concerns the colour of the fore tarsi. According to Papp et al. “ both description and figure [of Zaitzev] say that fore basitarsus and tarsomeres are yellow in + +Sphyracephala babadjanidesi + +, contrasting those of + +S. europaea + +. ” In the description, +Papp et al. (1997) +state “ Fore basitarsus all black, dorsal surface of other fore tarsomeres dark grey, at most 5 +th +tarsomere light ”. Comparison of photographs (Figs +16 +, +17 +) clearly shows that the colour of basitarsus and tarsomeres are similar for flies from +Azerbaijan +and +Hungary +. The second difference they listed is “ No dark hue in r 1 cell of + +Sphyracephala europaea + +, contrary to + +S. babadjanidesi + +. ” This feature is certainly a bit overrepresented in +Zaitzev (1919 +: fig. 1), but is not repeated in the text. Now, comparison of the wings shows no difference in this regard (Figs +12 +, +13 +). In wings from both +Azerbaijan +and +Hungary +, the very apex of cell r 1 can be slightly darker. The third difference given by +Papp et al. (1997) +concerns the +l / w +ratio of the fore femur. In the section on the legs of + +S. babadjanidesi + +, their statement that fore femora of + +S. europaea + +are more incrassate, has already been rejected (see above, and Table +1 +). The measurements given by +Papp et al. (1997) +are somewhat haphazard and not well presented. Fortunately, +Simova-Tošić and Stojanović (2000) +later presented high quality measurements for many characters and based on large series of males and females. The graphs for the ratio’s eye span / body length for flies from +Azerbaijan +, +Hungary +, and +Serbia +(Fig. +5 +) also clearly show no differences in this regard. Likewise, study of the wing morphometrics (Figs +107 +– +109 +) supports the conspecificity of + +S. babadjanidesi + +and + +S. europaea + +. + + +We present comparative colour photographs for flies from +Azerbaijan +and +Hungary +for anterior head (Figs +6 +, +7 +), wings (Figs +12 +, +13 +) and inner side of fore femur and whole fore legs (Figs +14–17 +, +31 +). These already give a strong indication that the same species is involved. Comparison with the large sets of genitalia drawings by +Papp et al. (1997) +and +Simova-Tošić and Stojanović (2000) +confirms the view that flies from +Azerbaijan +, +Hungary +, and +Serbia +are conspecific. + + +
+
\ No newline at end of file