+
+FIGURE 4.
+
+Eugenia macrosepala
+Duthie. A. Closer
+
+view of flower; B. Closer view of fruit.
+
+
+
+
+Notes:—
+Nair & Srinivasan (1980)
+effectively designated the
+lectotype
+for the name
+
+Eugenia discifera
+Gamble
+
+by selecting specimen CAL0000015511 (
+Figure 3
+) upon rediscovery of
+
+E. discifera
+
+after 85 years. However,
+
+Byng
+et al.
+(2015)
+
+later designated specimen K000821387 as the
+lectotype
+, unaware of the earlier lectotypification by
+Nair & Srinivasan (1980)
+. Consequently, the lectotypification by
+
+Byng
+et al.
+(2015)
+
+cannot be upheld, as
+Nair & Srinivasan (1980)
+were the original authors who effectively lectotypified
+
+E. discifera
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/4F/1B/B1/4F1BB14CFFE9FFE763CBFF09FA2C6CBE.xml b/data/4F/1B/B1/4F1BB14CFFE9FFE763CBFF09FA2C6CBE.xml
index 6b890efc3d8..e064d28dd0e 100644
--- a/data/4F/1B/B1/4F1BB14CFFE9FFE763CBFF09FA2C6CBE.xml
+++ b/data/4F/1B/B1/4F1BB14CFFE9FFE763CBFF09FA2C6CBE.xml
@@ -1,73 +1,73 @@
-
-
-
-Tubakia byeongjinii, a new species of Tubakiaceae, isolated from Quercus variabilis in South Korea
+
+
+
+Tubakia byeongjinii, a new species of Tubakiaceae, isolated from Quercus variabilis in South Korea
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Cho, Sung-Eun
-0000-0003-2338-3633
-Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, South Korea.
-secho0324@gmail.com
+Cho, Sung-Eun
+0000-0003-2338-3633
+Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, South Korea.
+secho0324@gmail.com
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Shin, Keumchul
-0000-0003-1665-7122
-Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, South Korea. & Department of Forest Environmental Resources, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, South Korea.
-kcshin@gnu.ac.kr
+Shin, Keumchul
+0000-0003-1665-7122
+Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, South Korea. & Department of Forest Environmental Resources, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, South Korea.
+kcshin@gnu.ac.kr
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Kim, Yong-Ho
-0009-0000-1357-7624
-Department of Environment and Forest Resources, Chungnam National University, 99 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea.
-ksnrn93@gmail.com
+Kim, Yong-Ho
+0009-0000-1357-7624
+Department of Environment and Forest Resources, Chungnam National University, 99 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea.
+ksnrn93@gmail.com
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Lee, Dong-Hyeon
-0000-0002-6400-6132
-Department of Environment and Forest Resources, Chungnam National University, 99 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea.
-donghyeon.lee@cnu.ac.kr
+Lee, Dong-Hyeon
+0000-0002-6400-6132
+Department of Environment and Forest Resources, Chungnam National University, 99 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea.
+donghyeon.lee@cnu.ac.kr
-text
-
-
-Phytotaxa
+text
+
+
+Phytotaxa
-
-2024
-
-2024-03-05
+
+2024
+
+2024-03-05
-
-638
+
+638
-
-3
+
+3
-
-294
-300
+
+294
+300
-
-http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.638.3.9
+
+http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.638.3.9
-journal article
-10.11646/phytotaxa.638.3.9
-1179-3163
-13213312
+journal article
+10.11646/phytotaxa.638.3.9
+1179-3163
+13213312
@@ -103,26 +103,30 @@ is given in honor of Professor Byeongjin Cha, for his contributions as a tree pa
+Type:—SOUTH KOREA
. Sejong-si,
36°30'24.5"N127°17'41.8"E
-, isolated from leaves on
+,
+
+isolated from leaves on
Quercus variabilis
+
,
-28 September 2020
+
+28 September 2020
+
. The
holotype
,
-KA
-23-0901, a dried culture of
-CDH
-041 was deposited in the herbarium collection (
-KH
-) of Korea National Arboretum. The ex-holotype culture (
+KA23-0901
+, a dried culture of CDH041 was deposited in the herbarium collection (KH) of Korea National Arboretum
+
+. The ex-holotype culture (
CDH
041=
KACC
diff --git a/data/A3/75/01/A3750118FFAB1F46FF76FE3E58F319B2.xml b/data/A3/75/01/A3750118FFAB1F46FF76FE3E58F319B2.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..40b6ab75e71
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/A3/75/01/A3750118FFAB1F46FF76FE3E58F319B2.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,582 @@
+
+
+
+Notes on taxonomy, distribution and conservation of Dichaea species (Orchidaceae: Zygopetalinae) in Brazilian Amazon
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Krahl, Dayse R. P.
+0000-0003-2899-9453
+Universidade Federal do Amapá, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Biotecnologia da Rede BIONORTE, Rodovia Josmar Chaves Pinto, Km 2, Jardim Marco Zero, 68903 - 419, Macapá, AP, Brazil.
+dayseraiane@hotmail.com
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Chiron, Guy
+0000-0003-0971-4715
+Université de Lyon 1, Herbiers, F- 69622, Villeurbanne Cedex, France.
+g.r.chiron@wanadoo.fr
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Krahl, Amauri H.
+0000-0001-7862-9624
+Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Botânica, Departamento de Botânica, Av. André Araújo, 2936, Aleixo, 69060 - 001, Manaus, AM, Brazil.
+amaurikrahl@hotmail.com
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Da Silva, João Batista F.
+0000-0002-1003-1041
+Mineração Rio do Norte, Rua Rio Jari s / n, 68275 - 000, Porto Trombetas, Oriximiná, PA, Brazil.
+jb.bina@gmail.com
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Cantuária, Patrick De C.
+0000-0002-3676-7866
+Instituto de Pesquisas Científicas e Tecnológicas do Estado do Amapá, Laboratório de Taxonomia Vegetal, Rodovia Juscelino Kubitschek, Km 10, 68903 - 970, Macapá, AP, Brazil.
+patrickcantuaria@gmail.com
+
+text
+
+
+Phytotaxa
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-03-05
+
+
+638
+
+
+3
+
+
+277
+284
+
+
+
+
+http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.638.3.7
+
+journal article
+10.11646/phytotaxa.638.3.7
+1179-3163
+13213060
+
+
+
+
+2.
+
+Dichaea fusca
+Valsko
+
+,
+Holanda
+& Krahl (in
+
+Valsko
+et al.
+2014a: 134
+
+). (
+Figure 3
+).
+
+
+
+
+Type
+:—
+
+BRAZIL
+.
+Amazonas
+:
+Manaus
+: “Projeto Dinâmica Biológica de Fragmentos Florestais” (PDBFF),
+Fazenda Colosso
+,
+2°24’21”S
+;
+59°52’32”W
+,
+
+15 February 2006
+
+,
+
+J.J. Valsko
+107
+
+(
+holotype
+: INPA!)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Description:—
+Plant epiphytic, cespitose. Stem not swollen into a pseudobulb, 1.9–10.9 ×
+0.1 cm
+, elongated, compressed, usually unbranched, 10–40–leaved. Leaves 0.9–1.9 ×
+0.1–0.3 cm
+, narrowly elliptical, distichous, forming an angle of about 45° with the stem, conduplicate, apex acute. Inflorescence
+0.7–1.2 cm
+long, lateral, 1-flowered, floral bract double; external bract 0.1–0.3 ×
+0.1–0.2 cm
+, ovate, apex apiculate; internal bract 0.2–0.3 ×
+0.05 cm
+, lanceolate, apex acute to acuminate. Flower brownish with a whitish lip, pedicellate; pedicel + ovary
+0.2–0.5 cm
+long; dorsal sepal 0.3–0.5 ×
+0.15 cm
+, lanceolate, apex acute; lateral sepals 0.3–0.5 ×
+0.2 cm
+, lanceolate, apex acute; petals 0.2–0.4 ×
+0.1–0.2 cm
+, lanceolate, apex acute; lip 0.3–0.4 ×
+0.3–0.4 cm
+, trullate, trilobed; hypochile cuneate and slightly denticulate; epichile rounded and with an entire margin; lateral lobes triangular, asymmetrical, falcate and acute; apical lobe triangular, symmetrical and acute; column
+0.1–0.3 cm
+long; pollinia 4. Fruit not seen.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution and ecology
+:—From the material that we examined and referred to we can conclude that
+
+D. fusca
+
+is restricted to the Brazilian Amazon and occurs in two states. Hitherto it was known through the type material (
+holotype
+and
+paratypes
+) and some collections from the municipality of Manaus (
+Amazonas state
+) deposited in the INPA herbarium. However, from the specimens conserved in the herbarium MG, we could note its geographical expansion in the municipalities of Oriximiná and Terra Santa, both located in the far western part of the
+Pará state
+. In these localities
+
+D. fusca
+
+grows in dense rain-forests among a “terra-firme” vegetation in areas of “baixio” and “platô”. It occurs also among a vegetation of “campinarana”.
+
+
+
+
+Conservation status
+:—The Area of Occupancy (AOO) is estimated at
+36 km
+². According to the criteria defined in IUCN Guidelines (
+IUCN 2022
+), the threshold for Endangered category (EN) is met (criterion B). However, the species occurs in nine localities (corresponding to the category Vulnerable [VU] through the criterion Ba), five of them being within conservation units. Even so the total area of occupancy suffers a continuing decline (criterion Bb) due to deforestation, mostly out of the conservation units but non-only. The total number of mature individuals is estimated to 250 which is just the limit between the categories VU and EN (criterion D). Consequently the taxon may be treated as Vulnerable (VU category – criteria B2ab[II],D).
+
+
+
+
+Taxonomic notes
+:—
+
+Dichaea fusca
+
+has been described by
+
+Valsko
+et al.
+(2014a)
+
+on the basis of material from the municipality of Manaus and has been erroneously and arbitrarily treated as a synonym of
+
+D. weigeltii
+
+(see
+Meneguzzo & Hall 2023
+), the type material of which is from
+Suriname
+, as shown in the drawing of the type deposited in the AMES herbarium (AMES00098867! – photography). Besides the presence of
+
+D. weigeltii
+
+in
+Brazil
+(Amazonas) is somewhat questionable. It is based on material deposited in the K herbarium (K000879277! – photography) which was treated as the species
+holotype
+according to
+Meneguzzo & Hall (2023)
+. However, this material contradicts the information contained in the drawing of the type. In the illustration we see that the material is from
+Suriname
+and that Weigelt is the collector (C.
+Weigelt s.n.
+) and in the material indicated by
+Meneguzzo & Hall (2023)
+as
+holotype
+we see that the material is probably from Rio Negro (
+Brazil
+, Amazonas) and that Spruce is the collector (
+R. Spruce 1719
+). Although
+Reichenbach (1859)
+does not formally indicate any type material for
+
+D. weigeltii
+
+in his protologue, we must trust the information contained in the type drawing because (a) it indicates C. Weigelt as the collector and (b) the taxon has been dedicated to him. Furthermore,
+Reichenbach (1859)
+confirms that
+
+D. weigeltii
+
+was collected by Weigelt in
+Suriname
+. He writes in his observation: “
+
+Nova videtur species, quam tenemus ab Weigelt in Surinamo lectam et quae sub 1779 “Barra on trees in Forest.
+Jul. 1851
+. flowers pink” a Spruceo missa
+
+”. (A new species, which we hold from Weigelt collected in
+Suriname
+and which was sent to Spruce under the number 1779 […]).
+
+
+Moreover, the material deposited in K (K000879277!), as we could see, clearly corresponds to
+
+Dichaea tenuis
+Schweinfurth (1952: 510)
+
+mainly on the basis of the vegetative characters and because it is frequently common in the collection region indicated on the exsiccata when it was determined: "Probably a collection made by Spruce in Rio Negro,
+Brazil
+. ". This species is a taxon widely distributed in the Amazon basin (
+
+Govaerts
+et al
+. 2023
+
+) and very common along the Rio Negro, mainly in the Manaus region (Amazonas) (personal observations). In
+
+D. tenuis
+
+the leaves are patent in relation to the stem, linear and relatively long in comparison to its size (
+Schweinfurth 1952
+,
+1961
+), features clearly observed in the material K000879277. Based on these characters present in both specimens AMES00098867 and K000879277, we could decide to treat
+D. weigeltii
+and
+D. tenuis
+as conspecific. However, the illustration of the lip of
+
+D. weigeltii
+
+in the former presents some clear differences compared to the illustration of the lip of
+
+D. tenuis
+
+(see
+Schweinfurth 1961
+), differences that prevent us to make such an affirmation.
+
+
+
+Thus, we conclude that
+
+D. weigeltii
+
+is a taxon needing to be better elucidated and that its real determination should be better investigated before proposing any taxonomic conclusion as, for example, deciding that
+
+D. fusca
+
+is a synonym.
+
+Dichaea fusca
+
+is somewhat different from what is proposed in the illustration of
+
+D. weigeltii
+
+. The leaves of the former are narrowly elliptic (
+vs
+. linear in the latter) and arranged at a 45° angle (
+vs
+. patent) in relation to the stem. In the former the hypochile is cuneate and broader (
+vs
+. oblong and narrower) and the epichile is triangular apiculate concave (v
+s
+. anchor-shaped and rather acute) (
+Reichenbach 1859
+,
+
+Valsko
+et al.
+2014a
+
+). Consequently,
+
+D. fusca
+
+must, for now, be considered as a valid and independent species.
+
+
+
+
+FIGURE 4.
+Geographic distribution map of
+
+Dichaea fusca
+
+in the Brazilian Amazon with our new records.
+
+
+
+
+Additional material examined:
+—
+
+BRAZIL
+.
+Amazonas
+:
+Manaus
+: “Projeto Dinâmica Biológica de Fragmentos Florestais” (PDBFF),
+Fazenda Porto Alegre
+,
+2°21’19”S
+;
+59°57’31”W
+,
+
+17 February 2012
+
+,
+
+J.J. Valsko
+109
+
+(INPA!)
+
+;
+
+BR 174, Km 45
+,
+Reserva Biológica de Campina
+,
+2°35’29.9”S
+;
+60°01’49.5”W
+,
+
+20 December 2012
+
+,
+
+A.H. Krahl
+&
+D.R.P. Krahl
+404
+
+(
+INPA
+!)
+
+;
+
+Ramal Vale do Novo Amanhecer
+,
+
+20 February 2016
+
+,
+
+A.H. Krahl
+&
+J.J. Valsko
+547
+
+(
+INPA
+!)
+
+;
+
+Ramal Castanheira
+,
+
+24 February
+, 2019
+
+,
+
+A.H. Krahl
+1112
+
+(
+INPA
+!)
+
+;
+
+Reserva Florestal Adolpho Ducke
+,
+
+03 May 2019
+
+,
+
+D.R.P. Krahl
+&
+A.H. Krahl
+512
+
+(
+INPA
+!)
+
+;
+
+idem,
+
+12 June 2019
+
+,
+
+A.H. Krahl
+&
+D.R.P. Krahl
+1254
+
+(
+INPA
+!)
+
+;
+
+idem,
+
+22 February 2020
+
+,
+
+D.R.P. Krahl
+&
+A.H. Krahl
+639
+
+(
+INPA
+!)
+
+;
+
+Ramal da Usina
+,
+
+02 February 2022
+
+,
+
+A.H. Krahl
+&
+D.R.P. Krahl
+1639
+
+(
+INPA
+!)
+
+;
+
+Pará
+:
+Oriximiná
+:
+Porto Trombetas
+,
+Floresta Nacional de Saracá-Taquera
+,
+platô Saracá
+,
+
+13 March 2018
+
+,
+
+J.B.F. da Silva
+3569
+
+(
+MG
+!)
+
+;
+
+Terra Santa
+:
+Abaocu
+,
+ilha do Rio Nhamundá
+,
+
+14 March 2018
+
+,
+
+R. Sousa
+&
+J.B.F. da Silva
+23
+
+(
+MG
+!)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/A3/75/01/A3750118FFAE1F44FF76F948596E1ED1.xml b/data/A3/75/01/A3750118FFAE1F44FF76F948596E1ED1.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2569b07c22f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/A3/75/01/A3750118FFAE1F44FF76F948596E1ED1.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,387 @@
+
+
+
+Notes on taxonomy, distribution and conservation of Dichaea species (Orchidaceae: Zygopetalinae) in Brazilian Amazon
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Krahl, Dayse R. P.
+0000-0003-2899-9453
+Universidade Federal do Amapá, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Biotecnologia da Rede BIONORTE, Rodovia Josmar Chaves Pinto, Km 2, Jardim Marco Zero, 68903 - 419, Macapá, AP, Brazil.
+dayseraiane@hotmail.com
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Chiron, Guy
+0000-0003-0971-4715
+Université de Lyon 1, Herbiers, F- 69622, Villeurbanne Cedex, France.
+g.r.chiron@wanadoo.fr
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Krahl, Amauri H.
+0000-0001-7862-9624
+Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Botânica, Departamento de Botânica, Av. André Araújo, 2936, Aleixo, 69060 - 001, Manaus, AM, Brazil.
+amaurikrahl@hotmail.com
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Da Silva, João Batista F.
+0000-0002-1003-1041
+Mineração Rio do Norte, Rua Rio Jari s / n, 68275 - 000, Porto Trombetas, Oriximiná, PA, Brazil.
+jb.bina@gmail.com
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Cantuária, Patrick De C.
+0000-0002-3676-7866
+Instituto de Pesquisas Científicas e Tecnológicas do Estado do Amapá, Laboratório de Taxonomia Vegetal, Rodovia Juscelino Kubitschek, Km 10, 68903 - 970, Macapá, AP, Brazil.
+patrickcantuaria@gmail.com
+
+text
+
+
+Phytotaxa
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-03-05
+
+
+638
+
+
+3
+
+
+277
+284
+
+
+
+
+http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.638.3.7
+
+journal article
+10.11646/phytotaxa.638.3.7
+1179-3163
+13213060
+
+
+
+
+1.
+
+Dichaea saraca-taquerensis
+Campacci & Silva (2015: 410)
+
+. (
+Figure 1
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+
+:—
+BRAZIL
+. Pará: Oriximiná: Porto Trombetas, FLONA Saracá-Taquera, platô Taquera,
+31 March 2009
+,
+J.B.F. da Silva 2163
+(
+holotype
+: MG!).
+
+
+
+
+=
+
+Dichaea integrilabia
+Valsko, Krahl & Chiron
+
+(in
+
+Krahl
+et al.
+2016: 146
+
+),
+syn. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Type
+:—
+BRAZIL
+. Amazonas: Manaus: “Projeto Dinâmica Biológica de Fragmentos Florestais” (PDBFF), Fazenda Porto Alegre,
+2°21’19.19”S
+;
+59°57’31.81”W
+,
+21 September 2012
+,
+9 December 2012
+,
+J.J. Valsko 111
+(
+holotype
+: INPA!).
+
+
+
+
+Description:—
+Plant epiphytic subpendulous. Stem not swollen into pseudobulb, 6.2–25.5 ×
+0.2–0.5 cm
+, compressed or cylindrical, elongated, unbranched, 20–40–leaved. Leaves 2.0–4.1 ×
+0.3–0.6 cm
+, oblong-elliptic to oblong-lanceolate, distichous, conduplicate, apex acute. Inflorescence 1.8–2.5 long, lateral, 1-flowered, floral bract double; external bract 0.2–0.3 ×
+0.2–0.3 cm
+, ovate, apiculate; internal bract 0.3–0.4 ×
+0.05 cm
+, linear, acute. Flower greenish yellow, pedicellate; pedicel + ovary 1.3–2.0 cm long; dorsal sepal 0.6–0.7 ×
+0.2–0.3 cm
+, oblong to elliptic, apex obtuse; lateral sepals 0.6–0.7 ×
+0.2–0.3 cm
+, oblong to elliptic, asymmetrical, apex obtuse; petals 0.5–0.7 ×
+0.1–0.3 cm
+, oblanceolate to elliptic, apex obtuse; lip 0.5–0.6 ×
+0.3–0.5 cm
+, entire, obovate, concave, apex obtuse; column
+0.3–0.4 cm
+long; pollinia 4. Fruit not seen.
+
+
+
+
+
+Distribution and ecology
+:—The material examined and consulted revealed that
+
+D. saraca-taquerensis
+
+is restricted to the Brazilian Amazon and occurs in two states (
+Figure 2
+). In the state of
+Amazonas
+, in the municipalities of Manaus and Presidente Figueiredo, it grows in Dense Ombrophylous Forest in a “terra-firme” vegetation (not flooding environment) in areas de “baixio” (close to streams) and it also occurs near a stream however among in a different vegetation, “campinarana” (on sandy soil). In the
+Pará state
+it is also found in Dense Ombrophylous Forest with a “terra-firme” vegetation of the municipalities of Terra Santa and Oriximiná. However, it was also observed in areas of “Platô” (areas higher and usually far from streams).
+
+
+
+
+FIGURE 2.
+Geographic distribution map of
+
+Dichaea saraca-taquerensis
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Conservation status
+:—The Area of Occupancy (AOO) is estimated at
+20 km
+². According to the criteria defined in IUCN Guidelines (
+IUCN 2022
+), the threshold for Endangered category (EN) is met (criterion B). Besides the species occurs in five localities (criterion Ba). Three of these localities are within conservation units however the total area of occupancy suffers a continuing decline (criterion Bb) due to deforestation, mostly out of the conservation units but non-only. The total number of mature individuals (criterion D) is estimated to 100. Consequently the taxon may be treated as Endangered (EN category—criteria B2ab[II],D).
+
+
+
+
+Taxonomic notes
+:—According to the
+holotype
+and protologue of
+Campacci & Silva (2015)
+,
+
+D. saraca-taquerensis
+
+presents, as an evident distinctive character when compared to other congeneric species, a lip entire and obovate and an infrastigmatic ligule papillose. Based on these features and after analyzing the
+holotype
+and protologue of
+
+Krahl
+et al
+. (2016)
+
+, we can note that
+
+D. integrilabia
+
+presents the same morphology. Consequently, we propose here its synonymization. Having been published a year before, the name
+
+D. saraca-taquerensis
+
+must be retained.
+
+
+Some differences linked to the descriptive terminology used by
+Campacci & Silva (2015)
+and
+
+Krahl
+et al.
+(2016)
+
+can be observed in the descriptions of
+
+D. saraca-taquerensis
+
+and
+
+D. integrilabia
+
+respectively. However, they do not directly affect the fact that these taxa have the same morphological circumscription: it is only a matter of points of view. Acceptable differences are observed in the color of some flower segments such as: flower whitish with pale greenish nuances in
+
+D. saraca-taquerensis
+
+(
+vs
+. yellowish cream in
+
+D. integrilabia
+
+), column whitish in
+
+D. saraca-taquerensis
+
+(
+vs
+. cream with a slight pinkish to reddish hue near the apex in
+
+D. integrilabia
+
+) and an anther cap pinkish in
+
+D. saraca-taquerensis
+
+(
+vs
+. brownish in
+
+D. integrilabia
+
+). These differences in the color can be due to different stages of flower ripeness or represent some population variation.
+
+
+In
+Campacci & Silva (2015)
+, the leaf of
+
+D. saraca-taquerensis
+
+is described as oblong-lanceolate whereas
+
+Krahl
+et al.
+(2016)
+
+describe the leaf of
+
+D. integrilabia
+
+as elliptic. Other differences can be noted in the shape of the flower segments: dorsal sepal elliptic apiculate in
+
+D. saraca-taquerensis
+
+(
+vs.
+lanceolate acute in
+
+D. integrilabia
+
+), lateral sepals and petals respectively elliptic-lanceolate and lanceolate and lip respectively sub-orbicular and ovate (
+Campacci & Silva 2015
+,
+
+Krahl
+et al.
+2016
+
+). However, based on our analyses, both materials can be best described as having oblong-elliptic to oblong-lanceolate leaves, oblong to elliptic sepals and oblanceolate to elliptic petals. The lip must be mainly described as obovate, wider near the apex than near the base (definition according to
+Gonçalves & Lorenzi 2007
+).
+
+
+
+
+Additional material examined:
+—
+BRAZIL
+. Amazonas: Manaus: Reserva Florestal Adolpho Ducke,
+31 January 2019
+,
+D.R.P. Krahl & A.H. Krahl 360
+(INPA!); idem,
+07 March 2019
+,
+A.H. Krahl & D.R.P. Krahl 1131
+(INPA!); Presidente Figueiredo: Cachoeira da Iracema,
+18April 2020
+,
+A.H. Krahl & D.R.P. Krahl 1445
+(INPA!); Pará:Oriximiná: Porto Trombetas, FLONA Saracá-Taquera-MRN, Platô SW4,
+16 January 2010
+,
+J.B.F. da Silva 3334
+(MG!); Terra Santa: Abaocu,
+14 March 2018
+,
+R. Sousa 27
+(MG!); idem,
+R. Sousa 33
+(MG!); idem,
+R. Sousa 34
+(MG!); idem,
+R. Sousa 35
+(MG!).
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/A6/1E/42/A61E4295ACD4528091F159E1DB73667E.xml b/data/A6/1E/42/A61E4295ACD4528091F159E1DB73667E.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f2fb87804be
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/A6/1E/42/A61E4295ACD4528091F159E1DB73667E.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,593 @@
+
+
+
+Another new ring nematode, Xenocriconemella andreae sp. nov. (Nematoda, Criconematidae), from the Iberian Peninsula
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Cantalapiedra-Navarrete, Carolina
+0000-0001-7458-7391
+Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible, Departamento de Protección de Cultivos, Avenida Menén-dez Pidal s / n, 14004 Córdoba, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario, ceiA 3, Spain
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Clavero-Camacho, Ilenia
+0000-0002-0134-9760
+Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible, Departamento de Protección de Cultivos, Avenida Menén-dez Pidal s / n, 14004 Córdoba, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario, ceiA 3, Spain
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Criado-Navarro, Inmaculada
+0000-0002-7514-9681
+Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible, Departamento de Protección de Cultivos, Avenida Menén-dez Pidal s / n, 14004 Córdoba, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario, ceiA 3, Spain
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Salazar-García, Rosana
+Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible, Departamento de Protección de Cultivos, Avenida Menén-dez Pidal s / n, 14004 Córdoba, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario, ceiA 3, Spain
+
+
+
+Author
+
+García-Velázquez, Ana
+Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible, Departamento de Protección de Cultivos, Avenida Menén-dez Pidal s / n, 14004 Córdoba, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario, ceiA 3, Spain
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Palomares-Rius, Juan E.
+0000-0003-1776-8131
+Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible, Departamento de Protección de Cultivos, Avenida Menén-dez Pidal s / n, 14004 Córdoba, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario, ceiA 3, Spain
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Castillo, Pablo
+0000-0003-0256-876X
+Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible, Departamento de Protección de Cultivos, Avenida Menén-dez Pidal s / n, 14004 Córdoba, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario, ceiA 3, Spain
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Archidona-Yuste, Antonio
+0000-0003-4446-0642
+Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible, Departamento de Protección de Cultivos, Avenida Menén-dez Pidal s / n, 14004 Córdoba, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario, ceiA 3, Spain
+
+text
+
+
+Zoosystematics and Evolution
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-08-23
+
+
+100
+
+
+3
+
+
+1175
+1190
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zse.100.129009
+E691CFAF-0825-43EA-8756-952C32174072
+
+
+
+
+
+Xenocriconemella andreae
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+
+
+Females.
+Body ventrally arcuate to straight, slightly narrowing anteriorly and posteriorly. Body annuli smooth and retrorse 2.6 (2.5–3.0) µm wide, without anastomosis (Fig.
+6
+). Lip region with two annuli, not offset, not separated from body contour; first lip annulus partially covering the second lip annulus (Fig.
+6
+); second lip annulus retrorse and slightly wider than first annulus 9.1 (8.0–10.0) µm wide. Stylet thin, long, and flexible (Figs
+6
+,
+7
+, Table
+3
+), occupying 31 (27.2 – - 35.0) % of the body length, with short basal portion 7.2 (7.0–8.0) µm long and knobs slightly rounded 5.1 (5.0–6.0) µm wide. Pharynx typical criconematoid, with a cylindroid procorpus widening to a large muscular oval median bulb containing well-developed valves (8.0–9.5 µm long), istmus slender, and amalgamated with basal bulb. Excretory pore located from two to three annuli posterior to level of stylet knobs, at 102 (87.0–107.0) µm from anterior end. Nerve ring located at the level of istmus, 116 (103–124) µm from the anterior end. Vagina ventrally curved (14.0–17.0 µm long). Female genital tract monodelphic, prodelphic, outstretched, and occupying 43 (34.4–52.4) % of the body length; spermatheca almost hemispherical (11.0–14.0 × 12.5–18.0) µm, sperm absent. Anus located at 7.7 (6–9) annuli from the terminus. Tail short, conoid, and bluntly rounded terminus.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Morphometrics of
+
+Xenocriconemella andreae
+
+sp. nov.
+from the rhizosphere of mastic tree, cork oak, and chestnut from Linhó, Sintra region, Portugal; Aroche, Huelva province, Spain; and Trabadelo, León province, Spain
+1
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Character
+1
+
+
Portugal
+
Spain
+
+
+
Holotype
+
Paratype Females
+
Aroche, Huelva province
+
Trabadelo, León province
+
+
+
n
+
1
+
20
+
3
+
4
+
+
+
L
+
302
+
307.2 ± 21.0 (274–353)
+
331.3 ± 24.7 (303–348)
+
341.3 ± 12.9 (323–353)
+
+
+
R
+
114
+
112.5 ± 4.1 (105–119)
+
110.7 ± 2.9 (109–114)
+
114.3 ± 2.9 (111–118)
+
+
+
+Rst
+
+
35
+
36.0 ± 2.4 (31–40)
+
34.7 ± 0.6 (34–35)
+
34.5 ± 1.3 (33–36)
+
+
+
+Roes
+
+
47
+
47.7 ± 2.6 (42–52)
+
45.3 ± 1.2 (44–46)
+
46.0 ± 1.4 (45–48)
+
+
+
+Rex
+
+
38
+
38.5 ± 2.6 (33–43)
+
37.0 ± 1.0 (36–38)
+
36.8 ± 1.0 (36–38)
+
+
+
+RV
+
+
10
+
10.7 ± 0.8 (9–12)
+
12.3 ± 0.6 (12–13)
+
11.3 ± 1.0 (10–12)
+
+
+
+Rvan
+
+
3
+
3.0 ± 0.0 (3–3)
+
3.0 ± 0.0 (3–3)
+
3.0 ± 0.0 (3–3)
+
+
+
+Ran
+
+
7
+
7.7 ± 0.7 (6–9)
+
9.3 ± 0.6 (9–10)
+
8.3 ± 1.0 (7–9)
+
+
+
O
+
0.9
+
8.2 ± 0.4 (7.4–8.9)
+
7.6 ± 0.5 (7.4–8.2)
+
7.5 ± 0.5 (7.1–8.2)
+
+
+
A
+
8.9
+
10.2 ± 1.1 (8.4–12.2)
+
11.6 ± 0.6 (11.2–12.3)
+
11.5 ± 0.6 (10.7–11.9)
+
+
+
B
+
2.2
+
2.3 ± 0.1 (2.1–2.6)
+
2.5 ± 0.1 (2.4–2.5)
+
2.6 ± 0.1 (2.5–2.7)
+
+
+
C
+
22.4
+
26.3 ± 3.4 (21.9–32.5)
+
18.7 ± 0.8 (17.8–19.3)
+
20.2 ± 1.5 (18.7–22.3)
+
+
+
c’
+
0.6
+
0.7 ± 0.05 (0.6–0.8)
+
0.8 ± 0.03 (0.8–0.9)
+
0.8 ± 0.04 (0.7–0.9)
+
+
+
V
+
91.1
+
91.5 ± 0.7 (90.2–92.5)
+
90.8 ± 0.8 (90.2–91.7)
+
90.9 ± 0.7 (90.4–92.0)
+
+
+
+VL / VB
+
+
0.9
+
1.0 ± 0.1 (0.8–1.1)
+
1.2 ± 0.06 (1.2–1.3)
+
1.1 ± 0.05 (1.1–1.2)
+
+
+
Stylet
+
95.0
+
94.6 ± 2.9 (88.0–99.0)
+
96.0 ± 1.7 (95.0–98.0)
+
96.3 ± 1.5 (95.0–98.0)
+
+
+
Pharynx
+
135
+
132.5 ± 5.1 (122–140)
+
133.3 ± 5.7 (127–138)
+
133.3 ± 6.1 (127–139)
+
+
+
Max. body width
+
34
+
30.5 ± 3.3 (24.0–37.0)
+
28.7 ± 2.1 (27.0–31.0)
+
29.8 ± 2.2 (28.0–33.0)
+
+
+
Anal body width
+
21
+
17.6 ± 1.9 (14.5–21.0)
+
20.8 ± 1.0 (20.0–22.0)
+
21.1 ± 1.7 (19.5–23.0)
+
+
+
Vulva to anus distance
+
14
+
12.7 ± 1.8 (10.0–16.0)
+
13.2 ± 1.0 (12.0–14.0)
+
13.3 ± 2.0 (11.5–16.0)
+
+
+
Tail
+
13.5
+
11.9 ± 1.5 (10.0–14.0)
+
17.7 ± 0.6 (17.0–18.0)
+
17.0 ± 1.8 (14.5–18.5)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+1
+All measurements are in µm and in the form: mean ± s. d. (range).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Xenocriconemella andreae
+
+sp. nov.
+(drawings).
+A.
+Entire female;
+B.
+Female anterior region;
+C, D.
+Detail of female posterior region showing vulva and anus.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Light micrographs of
+
+Xenocriconemella andreae
+
+sp. nov.
+A, E.
+Entire female;
+C.
+Entire female showing body annuli without anastomosis;
+B, G – J.
+Female anterior body region showing stylet (arrowed);
+D, F, K – N.
+Vulval region showing vulva and anus (arrowed). Abbreviations: a = anus; st = stylet; V = vulva. Scale bars: 50 µm (
+A, C, E
+); 20 µm (
+B, D, F – N
+).
+
+
+
+Males.
+Not found.
+
+
+Juveniles.
+Body similar to females, including tail shape, but shorter. Edge of body annuli without appendages, marked with delicate irregular punctations.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis and relationships.
+
+
+
+Xenocriconemella andreae
+
+sp. nov.
+is characterized by the following measurements and ratios: a short-sized female body 307 (274–353) µm, a long and flexible stylet = 94.6 (88.0–99.0) µm long,
+V
+= 92 (90.2–92.5), a = 10.2 (8.4–12.2), b = 2.3 (2.1–2.6), c = 26.3 (21.9–32.5), c’ = 0.7 (0.6–0.8),
+R
+= 113 (105–119),
+
+RV
+
+= 10.7 (9–12),
+Ran
+= 7.7 (6–9),
+VL / VB
+= 1.0 (0.8–1.1). Morphologically and morphometrically,
+
+X. andreae
+
+sp. nov.
+resembles members of the
+
+X. macrodora
+
+- species complex (including
+
+X. macrodora
+
+,
+
+X. iberica
+
+,
+
+X. paraiberica
+
+,
+
+X. pradense
+
+, and
+
+X. costaricense
+
+), from which it can be separated by several morphometric traits and ratios. From
+
+X. macrodora
+
+, it is almost undistinguishable but mainly differs by a slightly higher c ratio 26.3 (21.9–32.5)
+vs.
+19.6 (12.8–25.3). From
+
+X. iberica
+
+, it is also almost undistinguishable, but differs by a slightly shorter tail length 11.9 (10.0–14.0) µm
+vs.
+16.4 (11.0–24.5) µm and a slightly higher c ratio 26.3 (21.9–32.5)
+vs.
+18.3 (12.1–27.3). From
+
+X. paraiberica
+
+, it is also almost undistinguishable, but mainly differs by a slightly longer stylet length 94.6 (88.0–99.0) µm
+vs.
+89.6 (80.0–100.0) µm, a higher number of body annuli (
+R
+) 112.5 (105–119)
+vs.
+104 (95–116), and a slightly higher c ratio 26.3 (21.9–32.5)
+vs.
+20.2 (13.0–28.6). From
+
+X. pradense
+
+, it mainly differs by a slightly lower
+VL / VB
+ratio 1.0 (0.8–1.1)
+vs.
+1.4 (1.1–1.5), a lower number of body annuli from vulva to posterior end (
+
+RV
+
+) 10.7 (9–12)
+vs.
+16 (14–18), a slightly shorter tail length 11.9 (10.0–14.0) µm
+vs.
+20.2 (15.5–25.0) µm, a higher c ratio 26.3 (21.9–32.5)
+vs.
+16.6 (13.7–21.3), and a lower c’ ratio 0.7 (0.6–0.8)
+vs.
+0.9 (0.8–1.2). Finally,
+
+X. andreae
+
+sp. nov.
+clearly differs from
+
+X. costaricense
+
+by a shorter body length 307.2 (274–353) µm
+vs.
+349 (276–404) µm, a shorter stylet length 94.6 (88.0–99.0) µm
+vs.
+125 (113.0–133.0) µm, a slightly higher number of body annuli (
+R
+) 112.5 (105–119)
+vs.
+124 (117–130), a slightly higher c ratio 26.3 (21.9–32.5)
+vs.
+22.8 (16.0–28.8), and a slightly lower
+VL / VB
+ratio 1.0 (0.8–1.1)
+vs.
+1.1 (0.9–1.3).
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+The species epithet refers to the name of the daughter of the last author, Miss. Andrea Archidona
+
+Rosales
+
+, who helped to take the sample of the
+type
+population.
+
+
+
+
+Type host and locality.
+
+
+The new species was recovered from the rhizosphere of a mastic tree (
+
+Pistacia lentiscus
+L.
+
+) at Linhó, Sintra region,
+Portugal
+(coordinates
+
+38 ° 46 ' 07.78 " N
+,
+9 ° 23 ' 41.96 " W
+
+). Additional specimens were detected from the rhizosphere of cork oak (
+
+Quercus suber
+L.
+
+) and chestnut (
+
+Castanea sativa
+Mill.
+
+) at Aroche, Huelva province,
+Spain
+(coordinates
+
+37 ° 54 ' 13.06 " N
+,
+6 ° 37 ' 02.95 " W
+
+), and Trabadelo, León province,
+Spain
+(coordinates
+
+42 ° 38 ' 38.3 " N
+,
+6 ° 52 ' 14.0 " W
+
+), respectively.
+
+
+
+
+Type material.
+
+
+
+Holotype
+female and
+16 female
+paratypes
+deposited at the nematode collection of the institute for sustainable agriculture (
+IAS
+) of the
+Spanish National Research Council
+(
+CSIC
+; collection nos. XEN-AND- 01 / XEN-AND- 16),
+Córdoba
+,
+Spain
+; and
+two females
+at the USDA
+Nematode Collection
+(T- 8065 p).
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file