diff --git a/data/03/A7/CE/03A7CE56FFFCFFC90AD3B0AFFEA8FD82.xml b/data/03/A7/CE/03A7CE56FFFCFFC90AD3B0AFFEA8FD82.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9e141fd24d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/A7/CE/03A7CE56FFFCFFC90AD3B0AFFEA8FD82.xml @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@ + + + +Notes on family-group names for bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) + + + +Author + +Engel, Michael S. +Division of Entomology, Natural History Museum, and Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, 1501 Crestline Drive - Suite 140, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045 - 4415, USA (msengel @ ku. edu). & Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West + +text + + +Journal of Melittology + + +2015 + +2015-03-13 + + +2015 + + +46 + + +1 +7 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/jom.v0i46.4839 + +journal article +10.17161/jom.v0i46.4839 +2325-4467 +13145840 +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0626B747-69EF-4C66-A9C5-A2EEB29187C1 + + + + + +Subfamily +Nomiinae Robertson + + + + +Dieunomiini +Engel, +new tribe + + + + + +ZooBank: + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +36893EC0-3899-4245-9D30-3AB083C4DEB3 + + + + + + +TYPE +GENUS +: + +Dieunomia +Cockerell, 1899 + + +. + + + + +DIAGNOSIS: Robust bees of moderate to large size ( +7–23 mm +in length); head capsule deep, gena and vertex broad, curving gradually to occipital surface; pronotum without transverse carina; metabasitibial plate of female with distinct marginal carinae, rounded apically; metasomal tergum I with mediolongitudinal depression reaching angle of anterior- and dorsal-facing surfaces, summit of depression broadly V-shaped and slightly elevated above dorsal-facing surface; metasomal terga II–IV apically with marginal setal bands, marginal areas not opaquely colored in contrast to tergal discs; metasomal sterna II– +V +of female with dense scopa, scopal setae extend dorsolaterally onto lateral margins of corresponding metasomal terga. + + +INCLUDED GENERA: + +Dieunomia +Cockerell + +and + +Epinomia +Ashmead + +, both found exclusively in North America. + + + + +COMMENTS: The recognition of the current tribe serves to emphasize the putatively sister relationship of these bees to other +Nomiinae +, their status as the only exclusively North American lineage of the subfamily, and their distinctive morphological features (outlined above). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/1D/64/4B/1D644B68FFB9FFCE2A2CB7D64DA532FE.xml b/data/1D/64/4B/1D644B68FFB9FFCE2A2CB7D64DA532FE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5be65d743dd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/1D/64/4B/1D644B68FFB9FFCE2A2CB7D64DA532FE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,762 @@ + + + +First report of Monoeca in Argentina, with description of two new species (Hymenoptera: Apidae) + + + +Author + +Torretta, Juan Pablo +Cátedra de Botánica General, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453, C 1417 DSE, Buenos Aires, Argentina (torretta @ agro. uba. ar). & Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina. + + + +Author + +Roig-Alsina, Arturo +Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina. & Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “ Bernardino Rivadavia ”, Av. A. Gallardo 470, C 1405 D- JR, Buenos Aires, Argentina (arturo @ macn. gov. ar). + +text + + +Journal of Melittology + + +2016 + +2016-03-04 + + +2016 + + +59 + + +1 +12 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/jom.v0i59.5031 + +journal article +10.17161/jom.v0i59.5031 +2325-4467 +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:164B4E3B-D34B-4ED1-9AD5-32E8010B46C1 + + + + + + +Monoeca armata +Torretta & Roig-Alsina + +, +new species + + + +ZooBank: + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +F2146668-13AF-4FA1-88ED-B8F63E90DAEF + + + + + +( +Figs. 3–8 +, +10, 11 +, +14, 15, 16 +) + + + + +DIAGNOSIS: Both sexes of + +M +. +armata + +run to + +M +. +lanei +(Moure) + +in the key to Brazilian species of + +Monoeca + +by +Aguiar (2012) +, due to the dark coloration of the integument, the infumate wings, and the polished, sparsely punctate +T +2. Comparing the structures of male + +M +. +armata + +to those of + +M +. +lanei + +( +Michener & Moure, 1957 +: their figures 43–45), the terminal sterna and genitalia are strikingly different. Since females of + +M +. +lanei + +are not known ( +Aguiar, 2012 +), some peculiar structures of + +M +. +armata + +such as the pointed pronotal lobe, the carinate dorsolateral angle of the pronotum, and the strong, short carina on the posterior surface of the hind femur, could not be compared. These features are not mentioned in the descriptions of any of the other known species of + +Monoeca + +. From the only two species of + +Monoeca + +not occurring in +Brazil +, the Mexican and Central American + +M +. +mexicana + +and + +M +. +pyropyga + +, this new species can be separated from the former by the pointed pronotal lobe and from the latter by the lack of fulvous pilosity. The sterna and genital capsule of + +M +. +armata + +are diagnostic for the species: the S7 has a median apical digitiform projection, which is keeled ventrally and is as long as half the length of the sternum ( +Figs. 14, 15 +); the S8 has two free apical points, which are as long as one fifth of the disc of the sternum, and have acute apices ( +Fig. 16 +); the genital capsule is characterized by the broad dorsal branch of the penis valve and by the strong dorsal lobe of the gonocoxite ( +Figs. 10, 11 +). The apically projected hind basitarsus of the male is a diagnostic feature of this species ( +Fig. 7 +). + + + + +Figures 10–13. +Male genitalia of species of + +Monoeca +Lepeletier & Audinet-Serville + +from Argentina (scale bars = 0.2 mm). +10. +Ventral view, + +Monoeca armata + +, +new species +, holotype. +11. +Dorsal view, + +M +. +armata + +. +12. +Ventral view, + +M +. +pulchella + +, +new species +, holotype. +13. +Dorsal view, + +M +. +pulchella + +. + + + + + +DESCRIPTION: +Holotype +♂ +: +Total +body length: 9.1 (range: 8.7–9.6) mm; maximum head width: +2.9 mm +(range: 2.5–2.9); forewing length (including tegula): +8.3 mm +(range: 7.7–8.6) (n=12). +Integument +mostly black (brown in some +paratypes +). +Legs +brown (brownish orange in some +paratypes +). +Tegulae +brown, wing membrane brown, veins and stigma brownish orange ( +Fig. 3 +). +Spurs +of fore and mid-tibiae brown, of hind tibia black. +Metasomal +sterna brown. +Labrum +with plumose, brown hairs. +Clypeus +with simple, long (2x +DF +) hairs on disc, lateral areas with decumbent, plumose, white hairs. +Paraocular area +and frons with erect, plumose, white hairs. +Vertex +with erect, plumose (1.5–2x +DF +), brownish hairs. +Gena +with adpressed, short, white hairs intermingled with long (2–3x +DF +), plumose, white hairs. +Pubescence +of pronotum, scutum, scutellum, propodeum, and metanotum dark brown. +Mesopleuron +with long, plumose (2–3x +DF +), brown hairs. +Legs +with brown hairs, mixed with yellowish hairs on middle tarsus, and on apex of tibia, and tarsus of hind legs ( +Fig. 8 +). +T1 +mostly glabrous, with few simple hairs on lateral portions. +T2 +– +T4 +covered with decumbent, plumose (1.5–2.0x +DF +), black hairs. +T5 +and +T6 +with abundant, plumose hairs (2.5–3.5x +DF +), intermingled with few white hairs at sides. +T7 +with pygidial plate covered with adpressed short hairs. S2–S5 with dense bands of plumose, and long, simple hairs ( +Fig. 4 +). +Clypeus +with coarse, dense punctures, except smooth and shiny apical band and median longitudinal band. +Supraclypeal area +smooth and shiny. +Paraocular area +with sparse (4 pd), fine punctures; area surrounding ocelli smooth and shiny. +Frons +with coarse, dense punctures. +Scutum +, scutellum, and pleura with dense (1 dp) and coarse (smaller than on clypeus) punctures. +Metanotum +and propodeum with very sparse and weak punctures, metaposnotum smooth and shiny. +T1 +smooth and shiny, with few, very fine punctures on anterior vertical area. +T2 +– +T4 +with dense, fine punctures, except median area glabrous and shiny. +T5 +and +T6 +with punctures sparser and coarser than on +T2 +– +T4 +. +Head +wider than long (1.00:0.78). +Eye +with inner orbits slightly sinuate and convergent below. +Proportion +of scape, pedicel, and first three flagellomeres 2.54:0.77:1.00:0.61:0.77. +Labrum +wider than long (1.00:0.60). +Clypeus +slightly protuberant (0.30x width of eye). +Supraclypeal area +elevated. +Median +sulcus (2x +DF +) present on upper frons. +Pronotal +lobe pointed in frontal view. +Dorsolateral +margin of pronotum shortly carinate (3x +DF +). +Scutellum +with weak longitudinal carina. +Apex +of hind basitarsus ending in strong tooth. S7, S8, and genitalia as in figures 10, 11, and 14–16). + + + + +♀ +: +Total +body length: +9.8–11.8 mm +; maximum head width: +4.1–4.3 mm +; forewing length (including tegula): +9.2–10.2 mm +(n=5). +Integument +mostly black. +Head +black except for brown flagellum. +Mesosoma +and legs black except posterior surface of hind tibia and basitarsus brown. +Tegulae +dark brown, wing membrane dark infumate, veins and stigma dark brown. +Spurs +of tibiae brown. +Metasoma +black except +T1 +– +T4 +with translucent brownish orange apical margins. +Pubescence +mostly black except as noted below. +Labrum +with numerous decumbent, plumose (1.5x +DF +) hairs. +Lateral +portions of clypeus with shorter (0.5–0.7x +DF +), plumose hairs and disc of clypeus with longer (1.5–3x +DF +), simple hairs. +Paraocular area +, frons, and vertex with short (0.4– 0.5x +DF +), plumose hairs, those on vertex intermixed with longer (0.5–1x +DF +), simple hairs. +Gena +with decumbent white hairs, intermingled with scattered longer (0.5–2x +DF +) white (and black) simple hairs. +Scutum +and scutellum with very short (0.1–0.2x +DF +), plumose hairs intermingled with scattered longer (0.5–0.7x DF, a few up to 3x), simple hairs. +Metanotum +with very short (0.1–0.2x +DF +), plumose hairs, and longer hairs (0.3–0.4x +DF +) on lateral areas. +Lateral +areas of propodeum with plumose (0.5–1x +DF +) hairs. +Mesopleuron +with plumose (0.8–1.0x +DF +) hairs on upper third, and those on lower third with hooked setae (1.5–2x +DF +). +Ventral +areas of mesosoma with shorter (0.5–1x +DF +), dark brown, hooked setae. +Coxae +and trochanthers with dark brown, hooked setae. +Foreleg +with simple and plumose orange hairs on distal tarsomeres. +Ventral area +of mid-basitarsus with long (1.5–2x +DF +), orange hairs, mixed with black hairs, and plumose (and simple), shorter (0.3–1x +DF +), orange hairs on distal tarsomeres. +Hind +leg with scopal hairs on hind tibia and basitarsus pale yellow, abundant, long (4–7x DF, a few up to 10x) hairs, but basal area of tibia with hairs black, and in some +paratypes +distal hairs of basitarsus also black; distal tarsomeres with orange hairs. +T1 +mostly glabrous, with few simple hairs on lateral portions. +T2 +– +T4 +covered with decumbent, plumose (1.5–2x +DF +) hairs. +T2 +and +T3 +with glabrous median area. +T5 +with abundant, long (2.5–3.5x +DF +), plumose hairs intermingled with simple hairs, pale yellow laterally, or entirely black in some +paratypes +. +T6 +with plumose hairs surrounding pygidial plate. S2–S5 with abundant, orange, hooked setae. S5 covered with long (3–4x +DF +), plumose, orange hairs. S6 covered with adpressed, short, orange hairs. +Sculpture +similar to that of male. +Head +wider than long (1.00:0.80). +Eye +with inner orbit slightly sinuate and convergent below. +Proportion +of scape, pedicel, and first three flagellomeres 2.33:0.61:1.00:0.50:0.61. +Labrum +wider than long (1.00:0.60). +Clypeus +protuberant (0.50x width of eye). +Supraclypeal area +elevated (in some individuals with very weak longitudinal carina [1.5–2.0x DF] on interantennal area). +Medial +sulcus (2.0x +DF +) on upper frons. +Pronotal +lobe pointed in frontal view ( +Fig. 5 +). +Dorsolateral +angle of pronotum carinate (3.0x +DF +). +Scutellum +with weak longitudinal carina. +Apex +of posterior surface of hind femur with arcuate, strong, short (2.0–2.5x +DF +) carina ( +Fig. 6 +). +T6 +without wax-extruding area at base + +. + + + + +Figures 14–18. +Hidden sterna of species of + +Monoeca +Lepeletier & Audinet-Serville + +from Argentina (scale bars = 0.2 mm). +14. +Ventral view of S7 of + +Monoeca armata + +, +new species +, holotype. +15. +Lateral view of S7 of + +M +. +armata + +. +16. +Ventral view of S8 of + +M +. +armata + +. +17. +Ventral view of S7 of + +M +. +pulchella + +, +new species +, holotype. +18. +Ventral view of S8 of + +M +. +pulchella + +, with disc largely damaged. + + + + + +HOLOTYPE +: +♂ +, +ARGENTINA +, +Misiones +, +San Pedro +, +Reserva Esmeralda +, + +15-XII-2011 + +, col. +L. Alvarez +( +MACN +). + + + + +PARATYPES +: +ARGENTINA +: + +Misiones +: + +1♀ +, +San Ignacio +, +Parque Provincial Teyú Cuaré +, + +5-XII-2012 + +, col. +H.J. Marrero +(on flowers of + +Heteropterys intermedia + +) ( +FAUBA +) + +; + +1♀ +, San Ignacio, + +30-XI-2015 + +, col. +J.P. Torretta +(on flowers of + +Heteropterys intermedia + +) ( +FAUBA +) + +; + +1♀ +, Iguazú, Parque Nacional Iguazú, + +6-XII-2012 + +, col. +J.P. Torretta +(on flowers of + +Mascagnia divaricata +(Kunth) Nied. + +) ( +FAUBA +) + +; + +1♀ +, Iguazú, Parque Nacional Iguazú, + +12- XII-2008 + +, col. +Zamudio +, +Colleselli +& +Gomez de Olivera +( +MLP +) + +; + +1♂ +, San Pedro, Reserva Esmeralda, + +14-XII-2011 + +, col. +L. Alvarez +& +D. Aquino +( +MLP +) + +; + +4♀♀ +, Guaraní, +El Soberbio +, + +19-XII-2013 + +, col. +J.P. Torretta +(on flowers of + +Heteropterys intermedia + +) ( +MACN +, +FAUBA +) + +; + +1♀ +, Montecarlo, + +29-XI-2014 + +, col. +J.P. Torretta +, +N. Gomiz +& +S.S. Aliscioni +(on flowers of + +Heteropterys intermedia + +) ( +MACN +) + +; + +34♂♂ +, +Bernardo de Irigoyen +, + +5-XII-1951 + +, col. +A. Willink +& +F. Monrós +( +IFML +) + +; + +1♀ +, +1♂ +, +Pto. Bemberg +, no date, col. +K. Hayward +( +MACN +) + +. + + + +ETYMOLOGY: The specific epithet refers to the presence of a strong apical tooth on the hind basitarsus of the male. + + +SCOPAL +POLLEN +LOADS +: In +three females +in which pollen scopal loads were analyzed the loads contained 100% of pollen of + +H +. +intermedia + + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/1D/64/4B/1D644B68FFBDFFC22A21B6D64EB9327E.xml b/data/1D/64/4B/1D644B68FFBDFFC22A21B6D64EB9327E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0e9b35b6811 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/1D/64/4B/1D644B68FFBDFFC22A21B6D64EB9327E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,770 @@ + + + +First report of Monoeca in Argentina, with description of two new species (Hymenoptera: Apidae) + + + +Author + +Torretta, Juan Pablo +Cátedra de Botánica General, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453, C 1417 DSE, Buenos Aires, Argentina (torretta @ agro. uba. ar). & Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina. + + + +Author + +Roig-Alsina, Arturo +Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina. & Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “ Bernardino Rivadavia ”, Av. A. Gallardo 470, C 1405 D- JR, Buenos Aires, Argentina (arturo @ macn. gov. ar). + +text + + +Journal of Melittology + + +2016 + +2016-03-04 + + +2016 + + +59 + + +1 +12 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/jom.v0i59.5031 + +journal article +10.17161/jom.v0i59.5031 +2325-4467 +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:164B4E3B-D34B-4ED1-9AD5-32E8010B46C1 + + + + + + +Monoeca pulchella +Torretta & Roig-Alsina + +, +new species + + + +ZooBank: + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +D7D566C1-FA7C-4E50-A8EF-587A157D417D + + + + + +( +Figs. 1, 2 +, +9 +, +12, 13 +, +17, 18 +) + + + + +DIAGNOSIS: The female of + +M +. +pulchella + +runs to + +M +. +campestris +Aguiar + +in the key to Brazilian species of + +Monoeca + +by +Aguiar (2012) +, due to the bicolored integument, the extended yellowish brown vestiture, the size, and the polished, impunctate first tergum. The only two species of + +Monoeca + +not occurring in +Brazil +are the Mexican and Central American + +M +. +mexicana +(Radoszkowsky) + +and + +M +. +pyropyga +(Friese) + +. From the former the new species can be separated by the pilosity of +T +2– +T +4 which is short and sparse in + +M +. +mexicana + +but forming conspicuos apical bands of long hairs in + +M +. +pulchella + +. From + +M +. +pyropyga + +the new species differs by the lack of fulvous pilosity on +T +4– +T +6 and the labrum. The male seventh sternum and the genitalia readily separate + +M +. +pulchella + +from + +M +. +campestris + +. The S7 has the two apical points free for one third of the length of the disc of the sternum ( +Fig. 17 +), and their apices are stout and truncate, while in + +M +. +campestris + +the free apical points are 0.12x as long as the disc, and are pointed. The dorsal lobe of the gonocoxite is enormous, as long as the distance between its base to the base of the gonocoxite ( +Fig. 13 +), while in + +M +. +campestris + +the dorsal lobe is slenderer and smaller, approximately one third of the distance between its base to the base of the gonocoxite. Both species show consistent differences in the shape of the sterna and the genital capsule. According to +Aguiar (2012) +, + +M +. +campestris + +is restricted to the Cerrado savannas, while + +M +. +pulchella + +occurs in the Paranaense forest of northeastern +Argentina +. + + + + + +DESCRIPTION: +Holotype +♂ +: +Total +body length: 8.0 mm; maximum head width: +2.1 mm +; forewing length (including tegula): +7.2 mm +. +Integument +dark brown ( +Fig. 1 +) except apical half of mandible and flagellum brownish orange. +Legs +brownish orange. +Tegulae +brownish orange, wing membrane brown, veins and stigma brownish orange. +Spurs +of fore and mid-tibiae brown, of hind tibia black. +Terga +mostly dark brown, +T2 +– +T4 +with translucent apices, sterna brown. +Labrum +with plumose brown hairs. +Clypeus +with simple, long (2x +DF +) hairs on disc, lateral areas with decumbent, plumose, white hairs. +Paraocular area +and frons with erect, plumose, white hairs. +Vertex +with erect, plumose (1x +DF +), brownish hairs. +Gena +with adpressed, short, white hairs intermingled with plumose white and brown hairs. +Pubescence +of pronotum, scutum, scutellum, propodeum, and metanotum brown. +Mesopleuron +with long (2x +DF +), plumose, brown hairs. +Legs +with brown hairs, mixed with white hairs on tarsi of mid-legs, on apex of tibia, and on tarsi of hind legs ( +Fig. 9 +). +T1 +mostly glabrous, with few whitish hairs laterally and whitout marginal band of decumbent hairs. +Disc +of +T2 +– +T5 +with short, decumbent whitish hairs; apical margin of +T2 +– +T5 +with band (wider on center) of decumbent, long, whitish hairs, those on +T2 +shorter medially; on lateral areas with intermixed whitish and brown hairs. +T6 +and +T7 +at sides of pygidial plate with long brown hairs. S2–S5 with dense bands of plumose hairs intermixed with simple, longer hairs ( +Fig. 2 +). +Punctures +coarse and dense on disc of clypeus (1 pd) and on frons (0.3 pd). +Apical +band of clypeus impunctate, shiny. +Supraclypeal area +with scattered punctures medially. +Paraocular area +with very sparse, fine punctures (>4 pd). +Scutum +, scutellum, and mesopleuron with coarse and dense punctures (1 pd). +Lateral +surface of propodeum with sparse fine punctures, and metaposnotum shiny, with few punctures. +T1 +with anterior vertical surface with very sparse punctures (>5 pd). +T2 +– +T4 +covered with dense (1.5–2 pd), fine punctures. +T5 +and +T6 +with punctures sparser and coarser than those of +T2 +– +T4 +. +Head +wider than long (1.00:0.81). +Eye +with inner orbits slightly sinuate and convergent below. +Proportion +of scape, pedicel, and first three flagellomeres 2.55:0.81:1.00:0.77:0.79. +Labrum +wider than long. +Clypeus +slightly protuberant (0.30x width of eye). +Supraclypeal area +elevated. +Median +sulcus (2.0x +DF +) present on upper frons, reaching median ocellus. +Pronotal +lobe rounded in frontal view. +Dorsolateral +angle of pronotum flattened but not carinate. +Scutellum +with weak longitudinal carina. +Apex +of hind basitarsus without apical tooth. S7, S8, and genitalia as in figures 12, 13, 17, and 18. + + + + +♀ +: +Total +body length: 9.0– +10.1 mm +; maximum head width: +3.1–3.5 mm +; forewing length (including tegula): +7.4–8.6 mm +(n=5). +Integument +bicolored. +Head +black except median mark in mandible, apical margin of clypeus, and flagellum orange. +Mesosoma +black except pronotal lobe, upper half of mesopleuron, metapleuron, and lateral part of propodeum yellowish brown (some +paratypes +with yellowish brown reduced to pronotal lobe and hypoepimeral area, and upper part of metapleuron and anterior lateral part of propodeum dark brownish). +Tegulae +yellowish brown. +Wing +membrane yellowish brown, veins and stigma yellowish brown. +Legs +dark brown except orange dorsal surface of mid- and hind coxae (some +paratypes +with legs entirely dark, and other +paratypes +with legs almost entirely orange except dark tarsus and anterior surface of tibia of fore and mid-legs). +Spurs +of tibiae dark brown. +Some +paratypes +with metasoma entirely dark brown, others with metasoma mostly black except orange anterior and lateral portions of +T1 +, and lateral portions of S1, and + + +two paratypes +with orange extended to disc of +T2 +. +Vestiture +mostly black on head. +Labrum +with decumbent, plumose, black hairs (1x +DF +) intermixed with longer black unbranched hairs (1.5x +DF +). +Clypeus +with decumbent black hairs, mixed with sparse longer unbranched hairs (1x +DF +) and plumose whitish hairs in lateral areas. +Paraocular +areas and frons with numerous long (2.5–3x +DF +) white hairs intermixed with shorter (1–1.5x +DF +), plumose, black hairs; along inner margin of eye with row of thick hairs with short one-sided branches. +Scape +with very short (0.2x +DF +) black hairs. +Vertex +with erect (1–1.5x +DF +), plumose, black hairs. +Gena +with adpressed white hairs intermingled with long (1–1.5x +DF +) plumose, black hairs. +Pubescence +on pronotum, scutum, scutellum, metanotum, and propodeum abundant, plumose (1–1.5x +DF +), yellowish brown. +Metapostnotum +with scattered plumose orange hairs. +Mesopleuron +with plumose, yellowish brown hairs on upper two thirds, and with hooked, pale yellow, unbranched hairs on lateral lower third (1–1.5x +DF +) and ventral area (0.3–0.7x +DF +). +Legs +mostly with black hairs, but with some plumose white hairs on basal area of mid-basitarsus and white scopal hairs on apex of hind tibia and base of basitarsus. +Coxae +, trochanters, and basoventral area of femora with few hooked setae. +T1 +mostly glabrous, with few long plumose orange hairs on lateral portions and without marginal band of decumbent hairs. +Basal +half of +T2 +– +T4 +with short, decumbent hairs and marginal band (wider on center) of decumbent, plumose, long, golden hairs; adpressed white hairs on lateral areas. +T5 +with decumbent and erect plumose black hairs, intermingled with simple, longer, black hairs. +T6 +with plumose black hairs (shorter than those on +T5 +) surrounding pygidial plate. S2–S4 with long (1.5–2x +DF +), pale yellow, hooked setae. S5 with decumbent, white hairs and few shorter, pale, hooked setae, and marginal band of longer, plumose, white and black mixed hairs. S6 covered with adpressed short black hairs. +Sculpture +similar to that of male. +Head +wider than long (1.00:0.75). +Eye +with inner orbit slightly sinuate and convergent below. +Proportion +of scape, pedicel, and first three flagellomeres 2.35:0.64:1.00:0.47:0.64. +Labrum +wider than long (1.00:0.62). +Clypeus +protuberant (0.38x width of eye). +Supraclypeal area +elevated, with weak longitudinal carina (2x +DF +) on interantennal area. +Median +sulcus (2x +DF +) on upper frons. +Pronotal +lobe rounded in frontal view. +Scutellum +with weak longitudinal carina. +Apex +of posterior surface of hind femur with longitudinal, strong, and short (1.5–2.0x +DF +) carina. +T6 +without wax-extruding area at base + +. + + + + +Figures 1–4. +Males of + +Monoeca +Lepeletier & Audinet-Serville + +from Argentina. +1. +Dorsal view of mesosoma of + +Monoeca pulchella + +, +new species +, holotype. +2. +Ventral view of metasoma of + +M +. +pulchella + +, holotype. +3. +Dorsal view of mesosoma of + +M +. +armata + +, +new species +, paratype from Bernardo de Irigoyen, Misiones. +4. +Ventral view of metasoma of + +M +. +armata + +, same paratype as in figure 3. + + + + +Figures 5–9. +Mesosomal and leg structures of species of + +Monoeca +Lepeletier & Audinet-Serville + +from Argentina. +5. +Female mesosoma of + +Monoeca armata + +, +new species +, anterior view showing pointed pronotal lobe and carinate dorsolateral angle of pronotum. +6. +Female hind femur and tibia of + +M +. +armata + +, showing inner apical carina of femur (c). +7. +Male hind tarsus of + +M +. +armata + +, showing apical tooth-like projection (t) of basitarsus. +8. +Outer view of male hind tibia and tarsus of + +M +. +armata + +. +9. +Outer view of male hind tibia and tarsus of + +M +. +pulchella + +, +new species +. + + + + + +HOLOTYPE +: +♂ +, +ARGENTINA +, +Misiones +, +Puerto Bemberg +, + +7-XII-1933 + +, col. +K. Hayward +( +MACN +). + + + + +PARATYPES +: +ARGENTINA +: + +Misiones +: + +1♀ +, +San Ignacio +, +Parque Provincial Teyú Cuaré +, + +5-XII-2012 + +, col. +J.P. Torretta +(on flowers of + +Heteropterys intermedia + +) ( +MACN +) + +; + +1♀ +, +San Ignacio +, + +30-XI-2015 + +, col. +J.P. Torretta +(on flowers of + +Heteropterys intermedia + +) ( +MLP +) + +; + +5♀♀ +, +Montecarlo +, + +29-XI-2014 + +, col. +J.P. Torretta +, +N. Gomiz +& +S.S. Aliscioni +(on flowers of + +Heteropterys intermedia + +) ( +FAUBA +, +MACN +, +IFML +) + +. + + +Corrientes +: + +2♀♀ +, +Corrientes +, +Camping El +15, + +15-XII-2015 + +, col. +A. Ávalos +& +J.P. Torretta +(on flowers of + +Heteropterys intermedia + +) ( +FAUBA +, +MACN +) + +; + +1♂ +, +Corrientes +, +Camping El +15, + +15-XII-2015 + +, col. +A. Ávalos +& +J.P. Torretta +(on flowers of + +Stachytarpheta cayennensis +(Rich.) Vahl + +) ( +FAUBA +) + +; + +1♀ +, +San Martín +, +Yapeyú +, + +3-XII-2012 + +, col. +J.P. Torretta +(on flowers of + +Heteropterys argyrophaea +A.Juss. + +) ( +MACN +) + +. + + + +ETYMOLOGY: The specific epithet is derived from the Latin, and refers to the beauty of this species. + + + +COMMENTS: This species is variable regarding the color of the integument. Some specimens have more extended orange coloration on the legs, the propodeum, and the first and second metasomal terga, while in others the orange color is restricted to +T +1. + + +SCOPAL +POLLEN +LOADS +: In all females in which pollen scopal loads were analyzed (n=4), the loads contained 100% of pollen of the plant where each female was captured. A single female of + +M +. +pulchella + +had pollen of + +H +. +argyrophaea + +while all other specimens had pollen of + +H +. +intermedia + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/41/6B/62/416B622A0A00FFACFEF4876BB689FD88.xml b/data/41/6B/62/416B622A0A00FFACFEF4876BB689FD88.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fd6f43bf879 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/41/6B/62/416B622A0A00FFACFEF4876BB689FD88.xml @@ -0,0 +1,237 @@ + + + +Taxonomic and biological notes on Andinopanurgus (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Author + +Gonzalez, Victor H. +Department of Biological Sciences, 100 Campus Drive, Southwestern Oklahoma State University, Weatherford, Oklahoma 73096, USA (victorgonzab @ gmail. com). & Division of Entomology, Natural History Museum, 1501 Crestline Drive - Suite 140, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA (msengel @ ku. edu). + + + +Author + +Engel, Michael S. +Division of Entomology, Natural History Museum, 1501 Crestline Drive - Suite 140, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA (msengel @ ku. edu). & Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas. + + + +Author + +Sepúlveda, Paula A. +Laboratorio de Entomología, Universidad del Magdalena, Santa Marta, Colombia (entomopaula @ gmail. com). + +text + + +Journal of Melittology + + +2013 + +2013-01-12 + + +2013 + + +3 + + +1 +10 + + + +journal article +2325-4467 + + + + + + +Protandrena +( +Andinopanurgus +) +guarnensis +Gonzalez & Ruz + + + + + + + + + +Protandrena guarnensis +Gonzalez & Ruz, 2007: 402 + + +[ +♂ +]. + + + + +Rhophitulus guarnensis +(Gonzalez & Ruz) + +; +Ascher & Pickering, 2012 +[unjustified combination]. + +Andinopanurgus guarnensis +(Gonzalez & Ruz) + +; + +Moure +et al +., 2012 + +[unjustified combination]. + + + +NEW +RECORDS +: +Colombia +: +6♀♀ +, +Antioquia +, +La Unión +, +Corregimiento +Mesopotamia, +Vereda +el 40.0.5°54’27.4’’N +75°18’42.3’’W +, + +2575m + +, 20°C, 63% HR, 20, 21, + +24 Jul 2009 + + +, + +Sepúlveda-Cano, P. +; +Osorio, N. +; +23♀♀ +, +idem +except: +El Carmen de Viboral +, +Vereda la Palma +, +06°06’56.3’’N +, +75°20’12.8’’W +, + +2110 m + +, 24°C, 65% HR, 25 +Aug +, 17, 18, 20, + +21 Nov 2009 + + +; + +6♀♀ +, +idem +except: +Envigado +, +Vereda La Loma del Escobero +, +06°08’04.6’’N +, +075°32’17’’W +, + +2459 m + +, 19.4°C, 65% HR, 19, 20, + +21 Nov 2010 + + +( +MEFLG +, +SEMC +, +BBSL +, +AMNH +). + + + + +COMMENTS: This Colombian species was only known from the municipality of Guarne, +Antioquia +; the female sex was previously known from a single +paratype +in poor condition. + + +FORAGING BEHAVIOR ON POTATO FLOWERS: + +Protandrena guarnensis + +was the only andrenid visiting flowers of + +S +. +tuberosum + +among 70 species of bees belonging to the other four families present in +Colombia +(Sepúlveda & Smith-Pardo, unpubl. data). Females of + +P +. +guarnensis + +visited a single flower per plant. About 86% of the observed visits (n = 35) of + +P +. +guarnensis + +on potato flowers were recorded between 11:00 and 13:00 hours, several hours after the anthesis occurred (6:00–7:00 h); remaining visits were recorded between 9:00 and 10:00 hours. To release pollen, females curled into a partial C-shape at the tip of the anthers and sonicated one to four anthers for durations of 9 to 180 seconds (= 78.2, ± 1.47, n = 7); only in half of the observed visits did females contact the stigma. To groom and pack pollen in their metatibial scopae, females gripped the apex of the anthers or style with their hind legs, and either maintained their bodies somewhat perpendicular to or leaned to the anthers, facing the corolla, while removing the pollen with their remaining four legs. + + +A palynological analysis of the pollen taken from the metatibial scopae of +15 specimens +collected at flowers of potatoes showed that on average 80.3% (± 0.36, n = 60 plates) of the pollen grains belonged to this plant; remaining grains belonged to undetermined species of the families +Asteraceae +, +Melastomataceae +, and +Malvaceae +(N. Osorio, pers. comm.). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/41/6B/62/416B622A0A00FFAFFEF481ABB684FC48.xml b/data/41/6B/62/416B622A0A00FFAFFEF481ABB684FC48.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7e83fc4e30e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/41/6B/62/416B622A0A00FFAFFEF481ABB684FC48.xml @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@ + + + +Taxonomic and biological notes on Andinopanurgus (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Author + +Gonzalez, Victor H. +Department of Biological Sciences, 100 Campus Drive, Southwestern Oklahoma State University, Weatherford, Oklahoma 73096, USA (victorgonzab @ gmail. com). & Division of Entomology, Natural History Museum, 1501 Crestline Drive - Suite 140, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA (msengel @ ku. edu). + + + +Author + +Engel, Michael S. +Division of Entomology, Natural History Museum, 1501 Crestline Drive - Suite 140, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA (msengel @ ku. edu). & Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas. + + + +Author + +Sepúlveda, Paula A. +Laboratorio de Entomología, Universidad del Magdalena, Santa Marta, Colombia (entomopaula @ gmail. com). + +text + + +Journal of Melittology + + +2013 + +2013-01-12 + + +2013 + + +3 + + +1 +10 + + + +journal article +2325-4467 + + + + + + +Protandrena +( +Andinopanurgus +) +femoralis +Gonzalez & Engel + + + + + + + + + +Protandrena femoralis +Gonzalez & Engel, 2011: 66 + + +[ +♂ +]. + + + + +Andinopanurgus femoralis +(Gonzalez & Engel) + +; + +Moure +et al +., 2012 + +[unjustified combination]. + + + + + +NEW +RECORD +: +Peru +: +3♀♀ +, +2♂♂ +, +Junín +Dept., +21km +. +N. San Ramon +, +Pampa Hermosa Lodge +, + +1220m + +., + +24–27-November-2007 + +, +J. Heppner + +( +FSCA +). + + + + +COMMENTS: This Peruvian species was previously known from +Pasco +, the department north of +Junín +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/41/6B/62/416B622A0A03FFACFEFD812BB45DFCA8.xml b/data/41/6B/62/416B622A0A03FFACFEFD812BB45DFCA8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2fcac94d8a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/41/6B/62/416B622A0A03FFACFEFD812BB45DFCA8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@ + + + +Taxonomic and biological notes on Andinopanurgus (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Author + +Gonzalez, Victor H. +Department of Biological Sciences, 100 Campus Drive, Southwestern Oklahoma State University, Weatherford, Oklahoma 73096, USA (victorgonzab @ gmail. com). & Division of Entomology, Natural History Museum, 1501 Crestline Drive - Suite 140, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA (msengel @ ku. edu). + + + +Author + +Engel, Michael S. +Division of Entomology, Natural History Museum, 1501 Crestline Drive - Suite 140, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA (msengel @ ku. edu). & Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas. + + + +Author + +Sepúlveda, Paula A. +Laboratorio de Entomología, Universidad del Magdalena, Santa Marta, Colombia (entomopaula @ gmail. com). + +text + + +Journal of Melittology + + +2013 + +2013-01-12 + + +2013 + + +3 + + +1 +10 + + + +journal article +2325-4467 + + + + + + +Protandrena +( +Andinopanurgus +) +wayruronga +Gonzalez & Ruz + + + + + + + + + +Protandrena wayruronga +Gonzalez & Ruz, 2007: 400 + + +[ +♂ +]. + + + + +Rhophitulus wayruronga +(Gonzalez & Ruz) + +; +Ascher & Pickering, 2012 +[unjustified combination]. + +Andinopanurgus wayruronga +(Gonzalez & Ruz) + +; + +Moure +et al +., 2012 + +[unjustified combination]. + + + +NEW +RECORD +: +Ecuador +: +3♂♂ +, +Napo Province +, mtn. [mountain] side above +Lake + + + + + + +Papallacta, + +8-July-1980 + +, +malaise trap +, H. +V + +. Weems ( +FSCA +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/41/6B/62/416B622A0A07FFAFFEF1854BB320FD08.xml b/data/41/6B/62/416B622A0A07FFAFFEF1854BB320FD08.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c49f52e823b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/41/6B/62/416B622A0A07FFAFFEF1854BB320FD08.xml @@ -0,0 +1,309 @@ + + + +Taxonomic and biological notes on Andinopanurgus (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Author + +Gonzalez, Victor H. +Department of Biological Sciences, 100 Campus Drive, Southwestern Oklahoma State University, Weatherford, Oklahoma 73096, USA (victorgonzab @ gmail. com). & Division of Entomology, Natural History Museum, 1501 Crestline Drive - Suite 140, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA (msengel @ ku. edu). + + + +Author + +Engel, Michael S. +Division of Entomology, Natural History Museum, 1501 Crestline Drive - Suite 140, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA (msengel @ ku. edu). & Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas. + + + +Author + +Sepúlveda, Paula A. +Laboratorio de Entomología, Universidad del Magdalena, Santa Marta, Colombia (entomopaula @ gmail. com). + +text + + +Journal of Melittology + + +2013 + +2013-01-12 + + +2013 + + +3 + + +1 +10 + + + +journal article +2325-4467 + + + + + + +Protandrena +( +Andinopanurgus +) +maximina +Gonzalez & Ruz + + + + + + +( +Figs. 1–7 +) + + + + + + + +Protandrena maximina +Gonzalez & Ruz, 2007: 399 + + +[ +♀ +]. + + + + +Rhophitulus maximina +(Gonzalez & Ruz) + +; +Ascher & Pickering, 2012 +[unjustified combination]. + +Andinopanurgus maximina +(Gonzalez & Ruz) + +; + +Moure +et al +., 2012 + +[unjustified combination]. + + + + +DIAGNOSIS: Both sexes of this species are similar to those of + +P +. +rangeli + +in the unmodified antennal flagellum, shape of the female SVI, and male SV with a row of spines on the midapical margin. In addition to the geographical separation ( + +P +. +maximina + +occurs in +Venezuela +whereas + +P +. +rangeli + +in +Colombia +), + +P +. +maximina + +can be recognized easily by its larger size (head width ~ +1.8 mm +and body length +6.8 mm +in + +P +. +maximina + +vs. head width +1.6–1.7 mm +and body length +5.7–6.1 mm +in + +P +. +rangeli + +) and slightly broader female facial fovea. The male of + +P +. +maximina + +also differs from that of + +P +. +rangeli + +in the digitus of the volsellae, which is more elongate, the distal portion of the gonocoxite, near the articulation with the gonostylus, which is more protuberant in lateral view, and in the medial margin of the gonocoxite dorsally, which is strong, nearly carinate, forming a distinct apical lobe ( +Figs. 5–7 +). + + + + +DESCRIPTION: +♂ +: Total body length +6.8 mm +; forewing length +5.3 mm +. Head 1.2x wider than long, width +1.8 mm +; inner orbits of compound eyes converging below ( +Fig. 2 +); intertorular distance 2.1x OD, 0.9x length of torulorbital distance; torulus diameter equal to OD; ocellocular distance 3.2x OD, 2.1x greater than ocelloccipital distance; interocellar distance 1.2x OD; compound eye 1.9x longer than wide; clypeus 2.3x broader than long, projecting about 0.3x compound eye width in lateral view; gena 0.9x width of compound eye in profile; supraclypeal area, just below inferior torular tangent, distinctly protuberant; inner subantennal sulcus about 0.7x length of outer subantennal sulcus; facial fovea about 4.0x longer than broad, about half length of scape; scape 2.3x longer than broad, antennal flagellum unmodified, slightly longer than head width ( +Figs. 1, 2 +); pedicel about half length of F1, slightly longer than broad, F1 1.8x longer than broad, about 2.2x longer than F2 and F3 individually, remaining flagellomeres about as long as broad, except last flagellomere longer than broad. Forewing prestigma 2.3x longer than broad (prestigma width measured to its margin); pterostigma 3.6x longer than broad. Mesosoma narrower than head width; mesoscutum 1.3x wider than long, 2.8x longer than mesoscutellum, 5.1x longer than metanotum; propodeum with basal part about 0.6x mesoscutellum length in dorsal view; protibial spur with apical portion of rachis long, about three-fourths of malus, with distinct row of about 10 elongate branches (not including apical portion of rachis); mesotibial spur straight or nearly so, with coarse branches, slightly less than one-half mesobasitarsus length; metatibia with posterior marginal carina weakly toothed on upper half; metatibial spurs slightly curved apically, inner spur slightly longer than the outer; pretarsal claws with inner ramus slightly shorter than the outer. Lateral fovea of TII ellipsoid, about 2.4x longer than broad; +TVII +with V-shaped median emargination on distal margin; SV and S6 as in + +P +. +rangeli + +( +cf +. +Gonzalez & Ruz, 2007 +: figs. 11, 15), +SVII +, +SVIII +, and genital capsule as in figures 3–7. + +Color dark reddish brown to black, except clypeus with yellow maculation as in figure 2. Wing membranes brownish, veins and pterostigma dark brown. + + +Head with sparse, long (2.3–2.5x +OD +), semierect, poorly-branched, dark brown to black setae except whitish setae on gena posteriorly and hypostomal area; scape with long setae, 2x as long as maximum scape diameter, pedicel with setae as long as its maximum diameter. Pronotum with short (0.5–1.0x +OD +), dense, whitish setae along dorsal margin and pronotal lobe; mesoscutum, mesoscutellum, and metanotum with +two types +of setae: sparse, long (2.3–2.7x +OD +), erect, poorly-branched, black setae, and short (0.5x +OD +), denser (especially on metanotum), brownish setae; mesepisternum and lateral and posterior areas of propodeum with sparse, long (1.5–2.7x +OD +), erect, branched, whitish setae; legs with setae mostly whitish except brownish on tibiae and tarsi, longer and denser on coxae, trochanters, and profemur. Metasomal terga with minute (≤ 0.3x +OD +), semierect, sparse ferruginous setae on discs, laterally with denser and longer setae (1.2–1.4x +OD +); TVI with long (1.3–1.5x +OD +), semierect, dark brown setae on disc, setae denser on +TVII +; sterna with sparse, whitish semierect setae on discs, denser and longer laterally + +. + + + +Figures 1–7. +Male of + +Protandrena +( +Andinopanurgus +) +maximina +Gonzalez & Ruz. + +1. +Lateral habitus. +2. +Facial view. +3. +Sternum VII. +4. +Sternum VIII. +5–7. +Genital capsule in dorsal, profile, and ventral views. + + + +Outer surface of mandible and basal area of labrum smooth and shiny, impunctate; clypeus with sparse (1–1.5x +PW +), faint punctures, integument between punctures imbricate; supraclypeal area with scattered punctures laterally, weakly imbricate; subantennal area and inferior paraocular area with punctures separated by a puncture width or less, integument strongly imbricate to nearly granular (as on remainder of face); remaining areas of face with coarse punctures, contiguous, smaller than on clypeus; gena strongly imbricate with faint punctures. Mesoscutum, mesoscutellum, and metanotum with small, dense punctures (≤ 1x +PW +), integument granular between punctures; mesepisternum strongly imbricate with large, scattered (1–2.0x +PW +), faint punctures, punctures coarser and denser dorsally; metepisternum transversely striate near wing base, otherwise strongly imbricate. Propodeum strongly imbricate with fine and weak striae basally, lateral and posterior surfaces with faint, scattered punctures. Metasomal terga and sterna shiny, weakly imbricate with minute, scattered punctures on discs, punctures coarser and denser on +TVII +; distal margins of terga shiny, weakly imbricate, impunctate except on +TVII +. + + + + + +MATERIAL EXAMINED: +Venezuela +: +2♂♂ +, +1♀ +, +Mérida +, 15k. +E. Jaji +, +Ruta +4, + +24-July- 1988 + +, +C. Porter +& +L. Stange +, cloud forest ( +FSCA +, +SEMC +) + +. + + + +COMMENTS: This species was previously only known from the female sex. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/4E/47/87/4E4787BCFFE2FFFBFE5A17BDFD5CFEB8.xml b/data/4E/47/87/4E4787BCFFE2FFFBFE5A17BDFD5CFEB8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..38ece1ea300 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/4E/47/87/4E4787BCFFE2FFFBFE5A17BDFD5CFEB8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,249 @@ + + + +Colletes kinabalu n. sp., first record of the genus for the Malay Archipelago and Southeast Asia (Hymenoptera: Anthophila: Colletidae) + + + +Author + +Kuhlmann, Michael +Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW 7 5 BD, United Kingdom (m. kuhlmann @ nhm. ac. uk). + +text + + +Journal of Melittology + + +2014 + +2014-02-05 + + +2014 + + +28 + + +1 +6 + + + +journal article +2325-4467 +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FA0965D8-AE4D-4D01-A52A-1C9C7746EE62 + + + + + + +Colletes kinabalu +Kuhlmann + +, +new species + + + +ZooBank: + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +3F1B9062-F611-4877-9EB8-E053E34265C4 + + + + + +( +Figs. 1–2 +) + + + + +DIAGNOSIS: + +Colletes kinabalu + +belongs to the widespread Palearctic + +C +. +cunicularius + +species-group that comprises + +C +. +cunicularius +(Linnaeus) + +, + +C +. +armeniacus +(Friese) + +, and + +C +. +caskanus +(Strand) + +. The males of this group are characterized by their large body size (> +1 cm +), malar area at least half as long as width of mandibular base, broad facial fovea, metasomal terga densely covered with light brown long erect hairs, lack of white apical tergal hair bands, and trilobate S7. + +Colletes kinabalu + +differs from the other species of the group by its smaller size, the dark brown to blackish pilosity on the dorsal side of the body ( +Fig. 1a +) (yellowish to reddish-brown in the other species), apical sternal hair fringes generally short and slightly longer medially ( +Fig. 2e +) (much longer in the other species), the unusually long gonostylus ( +Fig. 2a +), and the characteristic shape of S7 ( +Fig. 2c–d +) [for shape of S +7 in +related species see +Noskiewicz (1936) +and +Stephen (1954) +]. The female of + +C +. +kinabalu + +is unknown. + + + + +DESCRIPTION: +♂ +: Body length 11.0 mm. Head slightly wider than long (width:length 1.04). Integument black except part of mandible, clypeus, and malar area partly dark reddish-brown. Face except clypeus densely covered with long, dark brown, erect hairs. Lower face laterally densely covered with short whitish-grey hairs ( +Fig. 1b–c +). Malar area medially about 1.2 times as long as width of mandible base, finely punctured ( +Fig. 1c +). Facial fovea broad, about twice as broad as width of antenna. Antenna black, ventrally dark reddish-brown. + + +Mesosoma integument black. Mesoscutal disc between punctures smooth and shiny; disc densely punctate (i = 0.5d). Mesoscutellum densely punctate but anteriorly less so, surface smooth and shiny ( +Fig. 1d +); mesoscutum, mesoscutellum, metanotum, mesepisternum, and propodeum covered with long, erect dark brown to blackish hairs ( +Fig. 1a, d +). Wings distinctly yellowish-brown; wing venation brown ( +Fig. 1a +). Legs with integument black to dark reddish-brown. Vestiture dark brown. Hind basitarsus as in figure +2f. + + + +Figure 1. + +Colletes kinabalu + +, +new species +, male. +a. +Lateral habitus. +b. +Face. +c. +Head lateral view. +d. +Mesoscutum and mesoscutellum. +e. +Metasoma (dorsal view). +f. +Metasomal terga 1 and 2. Scale bars = 1 mm. + + + +Metasoma integument blackish to dark reddish-brown, depressed apical tergal margins reddish to yellowish translucent ( +Fig. 1e–f +). +T +1 sparsely covered with long, erect dark brown to blackish hairs ( +Fig. 1f +); remaining terga covered with short, erect blackish hairs; +T +1 apico-laterally with narrow and thin hair band. Apical tergal depressions broad and deeply depressed, on +T +1 medially about three times as wide as laterally ( +Fig. 1f +). +T +1 with dense and relatively coarse, irregular punctation (i = 0.5d), between punctures smooth and shiny, on following terga puncture of disc successively smaller ( +Fig. 1e–f +). +T +7 broadly rounded, without emargination or spines. Sterna with dense apical hair bands, medially broadened ( +Fig. 2e +). Genitalia and S7 as illustrated ( +Figs. 2a–d +). + + + +Figure 2. + +Colletes kinabalu + +, +new species +, male. +a. +Gonostylus. +b. +Penis valves. +c. +Metasomal sternum 7 (dorsal view). +d. +Metasomal sternum 7 (ventral view). +e. +Metasoma (ventral view). +f. +Hind basitarsus. Scale bars = 1 mm. + + + +♀ +: Unknown. + + + + + +HOLOTYPE +: +♂ +, “Kinabalu, BrNo [British North] Borneo” ( +ANSP +). + + + + + +DISTRIBUTION: Only known from Mount Kinabalu, +Sabah +, +Malaysia +. + + + +ETYMOLOGY: The species is named after Mt. Kinabalu (noun in apposition), the only known locality where it has been found so far. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/8B/6F/FE/8B6FFE536511FFB6FF5FFB15FC07F923.xml b/data/8B/6F/FE/8B6FFE536511FFB6FF5FFB15FC07F923.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..93f0c31876a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/8B/6F/FE/8B6FFE536511FFB6FF5FFB15FC07F923.xml @@ -0,0 +1,172 @@ + + + +Two newly recorded jumping spiders, Neon ningyo Ikeda, 1995 and Sibianor nigriculus (Logunov & Wesolowska, 1992) (Araneae: Salticidae) from Korea + + + +Author + +Lee, Sue Yeon + + + +Author + +Yoo, Jung Sun + + + +Author + +Kim, Seung Tae + +text + + +Journal of Species Research + + +2016 + +2016-10-31 + + +5 + + +3 + + +601 +604 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.12651/jsr.2016.5.3.601 + +journal article +10.12651/JSR.2016.5.3.601 +2713-8615 + + + + + + + +Sibianor nigriculus +( +Logunov and Wesolowska, 1992 +) + + + + + +ẠĚĦƞợệHŔ +( +ṳAE +) ( +Fig. 2 +) + + + + + + + +Bianor aurocinctus +Prószyński, 1979: 303 + + +, f. 15-16. + + + + + + +Harmochirus nigriculus +Logunov and Wesolowska, 1992: 118 + + +, f. 4A­B, 5A­B, + +Logunov, Ikeda and Ono, 1997: 7 + +, f. 11­17. + + + + + + +Sibianor nigriculus +Logunov, 2000: 272 + + +, f. 272­273, 281­285, + +Ono, Ikeda and Kono, 2009: 583 + +, f. 268­272. + + + + + +Measurements (in mm). +Body length 4.13; Carapace 1.75 long, 1.35 wide; ALE­ALE 1.30, PLE­PLE 1.49, ALE­PLE 1.00, ALE­PME 0.45, AME diameter 0.40, ALE/AME 0.58, ALE/PLE 1.22, PME/PLE 0.33; Chelicera 0.55 long, 0.30 wide; Endite 0.41 long, 0.29 wide; Labium 0.23 long, 0.34 wide; Sternum 0.68 long, 0.45 wide; Legs I 4.84 (1.14, 2.72, 0.56, 0.42), II 2.71 (0.89, 1.07, 0.43, 0.32), III 3.27 (1.16, 1.13, 0.56, 0.42), IV 3.44 (1.07, 1.20, 0.67, 0.50); Abdomen 2.38 long, 1.53 wide. + + +Description. +Female: Carapace blackish brown, quadrangle, longer than wide, thoracic region surrounded with blackish brown rim and white hairs. Ceivical furrow and radial furrow indistinct, longitudinal fovea dark blackish brown, needle shaped. Eye area surround­ ed with black, clothed with white spatula­shaped hairs. Chelicerae pale blackish brown, one retromarginal tooth present. Endite pale blackish brown. Labium pale blackish brown, margin dark. Sternum blackish brown, long shield shaped ( +Fig. 2B +). Legs well developed, legs II­IV yellowish brown with dense blackish brown hairs, leg I robust, blackish brown, leg spiniformation; I(femur 0­0­ 1p, tibia 1­2­2r, metatarsus 2­2v), II (femur 0­0­2p, tibia 0­1p, 1­2­0r, metatarsus 2­2v), III (femur 0­0­2p, tibia 0­2­0d, 0­1p, metatarsus 2­2d, 1­2­2r), IV (tibia 0­1­ 0r, metatarsus 0­2d, 0­2v), leg formula 1432. Abdomen long ovoid, dull grayish brown, longer than wide, lighter laterally, dorsum with dense blackish brown and white hairs, 3­4 indistinct chevrons posteriorly, venter dull grayish brown ( +Fig. 2A +). Spinnerets dull grayish brown. Female epigynum with epigynal cone, copulatory opening situated anteriorly, spermathecae and copulatory ducts visible posteriorly ( +Fig. 2C +). + + + + +Material examined. +1$, + + +06­VII­1997 + +, Eundae­ri, Yeoncheon­gun, +Gyeonggi­do +( +ST Kim +and +JS Yoo +leg.) + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Korea +(new record), +Russia +, +Japan +. + + + + +Remarks. +This species was collected with pitfall traps around swamp. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/8B/6F/FE/8B6FFE536513FFB4FCB6FAA1FA80FA72.xml b/data/8B/6F/FE/8B6FFE536513FFB4FCB6FAA1FA80FA72.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9fb9573935c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/8B/6F/FE/8B6FFE536513FFB4FCB6FAA1FA80FA72.xml @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ + + + +Two newly recorded jumping spiders, Neon ningyo Ikeda, 1995 and Sibianor nigriculus (Logunov & Wesolowska, 1992) (Araneae: Salticidae) from Korea + + + +Author + +Lee, Sue Yeon + + + +Author + +Yoo, Jung Sun + + + +Author + +Kim, Seung Tae + +text + + +Journal of Species Research + + +2016 + +2016-10-31 + + +5 + + +3 + + +601 +604 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.12651/jsr.2016.5.3.601 + +journal article +10.12651/JSR.2016.5.3.601 +2713-8615 + + + + + + + +Neon ningyo +Ikeda, 1995 + +꼬Ř네ȇợệHŔ + +( +ṳAE +) + + + + + +( +Fig. 1 +A­F) + +Neon ningyo +Ikeda, 1995: 38 + +, f. 34­44, +Peng, Gong and + + +Kim, 2000: 13, f. 1­4, +Ono, Ikeda and Kono, 2009: + + +587, f. 329­336, + +Yin +et al. +, 2012: 1416 + +, f. 770a­d. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/EF/46/87/EF4687AEFFFF7F50FEB3FE2602B9FA40.xml b/data/EF/46/87/EF4687AEFFFF7F50FEB3FE2602B9FA40.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..23588d5892f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/EF/46/87/EF4687AEFFFF7F50FEB3FE2602B9FA40.xml @@ -0,0 +1,408 @@ + + + +Description of the previously unknown male of Systropha (Austrosystropha) macronasuta (Hymenoptera: Halictidae: Rophitinae) from Kenya + + + +Author + +Bossert, Silas +Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA (sb 2346 @ cornell. edu). + + + +Author + +Patiny, Sébastien +Université de Mons, Pentagone 3 D 08, 6, avenue du Champ de Mars, 7000 Mons, Belgium (patiny. s @ gmail. com). + +text + + +Journal of Melittology + + +2017 + +2017-04-20 + + +2017 + + +67 + + +1 +9 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/jom.v0i67.5929 + +journal article +10.17161/jom.v0i67.5929 +2325-4467 + + + + + + +Systropha +( +Austrosystropha +) +macronasuta +Strand, 1911 + + + + + + +( +Figs. 1–12 +) + + + + + +MATERIAL EXAMINED: +6♂♂ +, +13♀♀ +, +Kenya +: +Great Rift Valley +, +Marigat +, +0°27’22”N +, +35°52’49”E +, + +1300 m + +, 12 +October +, 2012, leg. +B.N. Danforth +, +T + +. + +Griswold, L +. +Packer, D +. +Martins, C +. +Njoki, M. +Nzisa Mutiso, W +. Tiren ( +CUIC +) + +. + + + + + +DIAGNOSIS: +♂ +: The specimens match the subgeneric morphology of + +Austrosystropha + +( +Patiny & Michez, 2006 +): F7 and following flagellomeres well-differentiated and forming part of the spiral, femur 1 dorsoventrally and laterally enlarged, femur 2 enlarged but less prominent than femur 1, coxa 3 elongate, +T7 +laterally toothed + +. + + + +Systropha macronasuta + +is the largest species of + +Austrosystropha + +(12.0– +15.5 mm +) known to date. The first six terga lack teeth, S1 is unmodified, and S2–S4 bear blade-like projections. S6 has two small apicolateral teeth, and the apex of S8 is enlarged with a well-developed ventral groove ( +Figs. 8–9 +). S6 bears a protruding bilobed projection ( +Fig. 9 +). The inner hind tibial spurs show two ventral rows of teeth but these are less prominent than in the female. The proboscis is conspicuously elongate and up to +5.6 mm +in length. + + + +♀ +: As all females of the subgenus, the female of + +S +. +macronasuta + +possess two conspicuous and well-developed rows of ventral teeth on the inner hind tibial spurs of tibia 3. The overall body size is large (11.5–13.0 mm in length). The integument is dark brown, with creamy white setae on the thorax, the first tergum, and the anterior parts of +T2 +. The pilosity of the following terga is increasingly brownish, and the setae on +T5 +and +T6 +are entirely brown. The second submarginal cell has a pentagonal shape + +. + + + + +DESCRIPTION: +♂ +: Head ( +Fig. 4 +) slightly shorter than broad (length: +2.25–2.63 mm +; width: +2.36–2.83 mm +). Integument darkish brown to black with creamy white setae. Setae highly branched, most densely plumose around antennal sockets, sparse and thin around ocelli and denser along posterior part of vertex. Setae which originate from genal area noticeably long and plumose ( +Fig. 2 +). Clypeus distinctly protruding, clearly shorter than broad (length: +0.39–0.46 mm +; width: +0.94–1.08 mm +), entirely shagreened with sparse, shallow but coarse punctation. Clypeal distal margin without projections but setae extending below margin. Mandible dark, bearded, +1.11–1.22 mm +long, bidentate with preapical tooth shorter than apical tooth. Proboscis long, comparable with morphology of female mouthparts drawn in +Ebmer (1994) +. Genal area slightly broader than compound eye ( +Fig. 2 +), with coarse punctation and shiny interspaces. Malar distance linear. Supraclypeal area shagreened, upper half with punctation. Supra-antennal area without punctation but with coarse structuring and dull surface. Antennal foramen located in lower third of face, in close proximity to epistomal sulcus. Scape enlarged, cone-shaped in frontal view. F1 conspicuously long and slender (length: +0.96–1.01 mm +; width: 0.20–0.21), longer than two following segments combined. Apical flagellomeres (F7–F11) strongly recurved, forming apical hook. F11 short. Dorsal surfaces of F1–F6 dark brown, F7–F11 light to reddish brown. Ventral surfaces of F3–F11 lighter colored. Diameter of lateral ocellus +0.18–0.19 mm +, median ocellus +0.25–0.26 mm +. Ocular-ocellar line +0.44–0.45 mm +in length. + + +Mesosoma: Integument predominantly black, darkish brown along ventral parts of mesepisternum. Pilosity creamy white, most dense on scutellum and on metepisternum behind base of hind wing, less dense on mesoscutum and metanotum. Sparse but erect setae on mesepisternum. Propodeal triangle completely hairless. Intertegular distance +2.57–2.87 mm +. Mesoscutum with punctation, generally dense but with greater distances between punctures around median and parapsidal lines. Interspaces up to three times puncture diameter. Integument between punctation shiny, slightly shagreened. Distal part of mesepisternum with shallow and scattered punctation, interspaces usually more than three times puncture diameter, mostly shiny. Basal area of propodeum without punctation but slightly shagreened and less shiny than posterior surface. Posterior surface of propodeum almost completely impunctate and distinctly shiny. Tegula brown, slightly darker anteriorly. Wings not strongly pigmented, yellowish-brown with brown venation. Three submarginal cells, stigma yellow-brown. First recurrent vein intersecting at second submarginal cell. Basal vein strongly arcuate. + + + +Figures 1–6. +The male of + +Systropha +( +Austrosystropha +) +macronasuta +Strand. + +1. +Habitus. +2. +Head, lateral view. +3. +Habitus, dorsal view. +4. +Head, frontal view. +5. +Habitus, lateral view. +6. +Metasomal terga, dorsal view. + + + + +Figures 7–9. +Details of male metasomal sterna 6–8 of + +Systropha +( +Austrosystropha +) +macronasuta +Strand. + +7. +Sternum 7. +8. +Sternum 8. +9. +Metasomal sterna in natural position, lateral view. + + + +Metasoma: Surfaces of +T +1– +T +7 with fine reticulate sculpture on tergal discs and marginal zones, most prominent on +T +1– +T +5. Surfaces of +T +1– +T +4 evenly and acutely punctured, interspaces sometimes greater than 3 times diameter. Punctation on +T +5– +T +7 slightly more dense but less acute. Marginal zones of +T +1– +T +5 notably less densely punctured, with sparse and very shallow punctures. Only +T +7 with distinct lateral spines and a blunt median process, comparable with + +S +. +krigei +Brauns + +( +Brauns, 1926 +: his fig. 2a). +T +1 with erect white setae, all other terga except +T +7 with sparse, more or less appressed, setae and without tergal bands. Coloration of setae mostly whitish, becoming darker on +T +6 and +T +7. Setae on +T +7 mostly yellowish-brown, erect. Sternal structures without bands of setae, but with a patch of sparse, erect and branched setae on S1. Following sterna more or less hairless, except for small sparse lateral patches. S1 unmodified. S2–S4 with distinct, paired blade-like ventral projecting lobes, those on S3 most prominent. S5 unmodified. S6 with two lateral spines and a conspicuous median posterior process ( +Fig. 9 +). S7 and S8 highly modified ( +Figs. 7–9 +); S8 elongate, with enlarged, bilobed apex visible in unprepared specimens. Genital capsule morphology illustrated in figures 10–12. + + + +Figures 10–12. +Genital capsule of + +Systropha +( +Austrosystropha +) +macronasuta +Strand. + +10. +Dorsal view. +11. +Oblique dorsal view. +12. +Ventral view. + + + +Modified Couplets of the Species Identification Key of + +Systropha + +by + +Patiny +et al +. (2013) + + + +2. +T +6– +T +7 lacking lateral teeth; S2–S3 with compressed tubercles, forming an apical lamella; S6 with two teeth (a medio-proximal and a medio-terminal ventral tooth) [ +Morocco +] ............................................... + +S +. ( +Systropha +) +pici +Pérez + + + +—. +T +6 and/or +T +7 with strong lateral teeth; S2–S3 with differently shaped tubercles or blade-like projections; S6 lacking teeth as described above but may have a ventral projection and small apicolateral teeth ..................................... 3 + + +6. +T +1– +T +5 lacking teeth ................................................................................................. 6a + + +—. +T +1– +T +5 with small lateral spines or blades ............................................................ 7 + + +6a. Small species (ca. +8–9 mm +); vertex and/or mesoscutum at least partly covered with reddish setae; S6 distally without protruding projection [ +South Africa +] .............................................................. + +S +. ( +Austrosystropha +) +krigei +Brauns + + + +—. Large species (ca. +12–15 mm +); all setae of vertex and mesosoma whitish, without red; S6 distally with protruding projection ( +Fig. 9 +) [Eastern Africa ( +Zanzibar +, +Kenya +)] ........................................... + +S +. ( +Austrosystropha +) +macronasuta +Strand + + + + + \ No newline at end of file