diff --git a/data/03/85/87/038587EBFFE7FF8FFF3BFC1D9A16FBAD.xml b/data/03/85/87/038587EBFFE7FF8FFF3BFC1D9A16FBAD.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..aeb20379c12 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/85/87/038587EBFFE7FF8FFF3BFC1D9A16FBAD.xml @@ -0,0 +1,400 @@ + + + +On the millipede genus Heteropyge: description of the adults of H. araguayensis and revalidation of H. bidens (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Spirostreptidae) + + + +Author + +Iniesta, Luiz F. M. + + + +Author + +Bouzan, Rodrigo S. + + + +Author + +Brescovit, Antonio D. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019032 + + +2019-09-09 + + +109 + + +1 +13 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019032 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019032 +1678-4766 +13265996 + + + + + + + +Heteropyge cayennophilus +(Silvestri, 1897) + + + + + + + +( +Figs 30−32 +, +36−38 +, +42−44 +) + + + + + + + +Archispirostreptus cayennophilus +SILVESTRI, 1897b:348 + + +.Male +holotype +from Cayenna [ +4°55’21.13”N +; +52°19’36.66”W +], +French Guiana +, deposited in IRSNB, not examined. + +VIGGIANI, 1973:355 + +. + + + + + + +Gymnostreptus (Gymnostreptus) cayennophilus +ATTEMS, 1914:132 + + +. + + + + + + +Orthoporus brasiliensis +SCHUBART, 1947:52 + + +. +Syntypes +from Aurá, Ananindeua [ +1°25’34.82”S +; +48°23’10.84”W +], state of Pará, +Brazil +, +18.IV.1940 +,A. L. Carvalho leg., deposited in MZSP and MNRJ 11846, examined; + +MAURIÈS, 1975:1272 + +. + + + + + +Scaphiostreptus (Scaphiostreptus) cayennophilus + +. + +ATTEMS, 1950:231 + +. + + + + + +Heteropyge brasiliensis + +. + +HOffMAN, 1960:113 + +. Synonymized by + +MAURIÈS, 1975:1272 + +. + + + + + +Orthoporus cayennophilus + +. + +JEEKEL, 1963:5 + +. + + + + + +Heteropyge cayennophilus + +. + +MAURIÈS, 1975:1272 + +; + +KRABBE, 1982:333 + +. + + + + + +Additional material examined. + +FRENCH GUIANA +, + +Cayenne +: + +Bordat Montabo +( +04°56’46.47”N +; +52°18’24.50”W +) + + +, +2♂ +, +5♀ +, +2 immatures +, + +VII.1951 + +, A. +R +. +Hoge +& +J. M. Ruiz +leg. ( +IBSP 636 +) + +; + +BRAZIL +, + +Pará +: + +Aurá +( +01°26’37.99”S +; +48°23’9.24”W +) + + +, +2♂ +, +6♀ +, +♀ +immature, + +18.IV.1940 + +, +A. L. Carvalho +leg. ( +MNRJ 11847 +) + +; + +52♀ +( +MNRJ 11881 +) + +; + +♂ +( +MNRJ 11838 +) + +; + +♂ +( +MNRJ 11840 +) + +; + +25♂ +immatures ( +MNRJ 11848 +) + +; + +11♀ +immatures ( +MNRJ 11832 +) + +; + +27♂ +( +MNRJ 11853 +) + +; + +♂ +( +MNRJ 11839 +) + +. + + +Diagnosis. Males of + +H. cayennophilus + +can be recognized by a rounded process on the prefemur of the first pair of legs ( +Fig. 43 +). Gonopod with an erect straight proplica ( +Fig. 36 +); a short or inconspicuous ( +MAURIÈS, 1975:1273 +, figs 32, 33) apicomesal process (app, +Figs 36, 37 +); distolateral process on metaplica (dmp, +Figs 36, 37 +) not protruding in posterior view; contiguous with metaplica ( +Fig. 37 +), different in diagonal aspect from that of + +H. bidens + +( +Fig. 34 +); short and rounded in appearance. + + +Description. Described by +SCHUBART (1947) +as + +O. brasiliensis + +and with a complementary description by +MAURIÉS (1975) +. Additional data are presented here. + + +Male ( +IBSP +636) ( +Figs 30-32 +). Total length: +40 mm +. Maximum vertical diameter: +2 mm +. + + +First pair of legs: coxae rounded, with 5+5 setiform setae in a curved row on mesal region ( +Figs 42, 43 +). Prefemur triangular; 2+2 distomesal setae; a rounded prefemoral process; inconspicuous scattered setae at base of the process ( +Fig. 43 +). Tibia with membranous ventral pads ( +Fig. 42 +). Neither femur nor postfemur with ventral pads (at least not imperceptible). Second pair of legs: coxae rounded. Prefemur apprised to and contiguous with distal portions of the coxae; postfemur and tibia with very short membranous ventral pads ( +Fig. 44 +). Penis elongated and rounded. + + +Gonopod ( +Figs 36−38 +). Sternum semi-circular. Paracoxite (px) rounded. Proplica very short (pp); erect straight; with short apico-mesal process (app, +Fig. 37 +). Metaplica elongated (mp); distolateral metaplical (dmp) process not protruding in posterior view ( +Fig. 37 +), rounded and contiguous with metaplica. Inner process of metaplica (ip) evident; straight ( +Fig. 38 +). Telopodite bulky; antetorsal process absent; a large, lamellar, broad expansion covering partially the solenomere. Solenomere with one complete 360° torsion. + + +Distribution. Known from the northern region in +French Guiana +( +SILVESTRI, 1897b +; +MAURIÈS, 1975 +), and extending down to the state of Pará in +Brazil +( +SCHUBART, 1947 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/85/87/038587EBFFECFF84FEE7FA7B9C9DFDB1.xml b/data/03/85/87/038587EBFFECFF84FEE7FA7B9C9DFDB1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..36402a55f93 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/85/87/038587EBFFECFF84FEE7FA7B9C9DFDB1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,129 @@ + + + +On the millipede genus Heteropyge: description of the adults of H. araguayensis and revalidation of H. bidens (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Spirostreptidae) + + + +Author + +Iniesta, Luiz F. M. + + + +Author + +Bouzan, Rodrigo S. + + + +Author + +Brescovit, Antonio D. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019032 + + +2019-09-09 + + +109 + + +1 +13 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019032 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019032 +1678-4766 +13265996 + + + + + + + +Heteropyge +Silvestri, 1897 + + + + + +process just before torsion ( +Fig. 24 +) and an evident seminal groove running medially on telopodite; solenomere concealed within the lamellar expansion and spirally coiled in one or two complete turns ( +Figs 21 +, +24, 25 +). + + + + +Distribution. Known from the Brazilian states of Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Pará and from fragments of Atlantic rain forest in the states of Pernambuco, Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo, from +Paraguay +and French +Guyana +. + + +Composition. Six species: + +H. araguayensis +( +Schubart, 1947 +) + +; + +H. bidens +( +Schubart, 1947 +) + +, herewith revalidated; + +H. cayennophilus +(Silvestri, 1897) + +; + +H. lineolatus +( +Attems, 1950 +) + +; + +H. paraguayensis +( +Silvestri, 1895 +) + +and + +H. solitarius +( +Attems, 1950 +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/91/87/039187DFAC313F23D8422C81FBB7FE77.xml b/data/03/91/87/039187DFAC313F23D8422C81FBB7FE77.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..02e823543c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/91/87/039187DFAC313F23D8422C81FBB7FE77.xml @@ -0,0 +1,297 @@ + + + +Cuatro especies nuevas del género Drosophila (Diptera, Drosophilidae) en las provincias de Pichincha, Napo y Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Ecuador + + + +Author + +Llangarí-Arizo, Luz M. + + + +Author + +Rafael, Violeta + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2018 + +e 2018040 + + +2018-11-29 + + +108 + + +1 +13 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2018040 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2018040 +1678-4766 +13265844 + + + + + + + +Drosophila cumanda + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs 22-31 +) + + + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +76CC9D4C-EEAD-4E07-A584- BFE1CBCB8AEB + + + +Material tipo. + +Holotipo +♂ +(montado en seco, genitalia en microtubo), +Ecuador +, +Napo +, +Cumandá +( +0°27’13.2ˮS +, +77°52’46.8ˮW +, 1864 msnm), + +III.2014 + +, +M. L. Figuero +col., L. M. +Llangarí +& +V +. +Rafael +det. ( +QCAZI 3162 +) + +; +alotipo +♀ +(montado en seco, genitalia en microtubo), los mismos datos del + +holotipo +( +QCAZI 3166 +) + +; +paratipos +: +3♂ +, +3♀ +(montados en seco, genitalia en microtubo), los mismos datos del + +holotipo +( +QCAZI 3163-3165 +, +3167-3169 +) + +. + + +Diagnosis. Frente marrón con manchas amarillas. Placa orbital marrón con áreas amarillas; cerdas emergiendo de puntos oscuros. Tórax amarillo en el dorso y marrón oscuro en la parte lateral con cerdas y pelos emergiendo de puntos oscuros, algunas veces fusionados. Con cerdas preescutelares. Alas con la vena transversal radial-media (R-M) y la vena transversal media discal-cubital (dM-Cu) sombreadas. Primera sección costal con una hilera de dientes, parte apical de la primera sección costal es oscura (costal lappet). La vena radial R +4+5 +y vena media (M) convergentes. Edeago quitinizado, alargado, ligeramente bífido con la punta quitinizada dirigida hacia la parte dorsal. Región dorsal del edeago con un par de proyecciones como alas, con abertura dorsal. + + +Descripción del macho, +holotipo +y +paratipos +(individuos provenientes de isolínea conservados en alcohol). Morfología eXterna. Longitud total (cuerpo + alas) 5.45 (4.90- 5.45) mm. Color del cuerpo marrón oscuro ( +Fig. 23 +). + + +Cabeza. Frente marrón con manchas amarillas. Longitud frontal 0.48 (0.45-0.58) mm. Índice frontal 0.85 (0.82-0.87). Triángulo frontal marrón con la parte central amarilla. Triángulo ocelar marrón amarillento, cerca del 55 (56-61) % de la longitud, ocelos amarillos. Placa orbital marrón con áreas amarillas; cerdas emergiendo de puntos oscuros, cerda orbital media muy cerca de la orbital anterior, distancia de or3 a or1, 92 (81-92) % de or3 a vtm, radio or1/or3 0.96 (0.72-0.93), radio or2/or1 0.74 (0.63-0.78), cerda postocelar 55 (58-63) % y cerda ocelar 71 (68-85) % de la longitud frontal; índice vt 0.76 (0.69-0.80); índice vibrisal 0.66 (0.58-0.72). +Frontal vitta +marrón con áreas amarillas. Gena y postgena marrón. Índice genal 6.30 (5.83- 6.30). Sin subvibrisa. Carina amarilla, prominente y surcada. Proboscis amarilla. Ojos de color rojo oscuro; índice del ojo 1.78 (1.69-1.95). Arista plumosa con cuatro ramas dorsales, dos ventrales, más la terminal bifurcada. + + +Tórax. Tórax amarillo en el dorso y marrón oscuro en la parte lateral con cerdas y pelos emergiendo de puntos oscuros los cuales algunas veces están fusionados ( +Fig. 23 +), longitud 1.61 (1.56-1.69) mm. Índice h 0.76 (0.63- 0.79). Ocho hileras de pelos acrosticales entre las cerdas dorsocentrales anteriores. Distancia transversal de las cerdas dorsocentrales 216(211-255)% de la distancia longitudinal; índice dc 0.76 (0.66-0.87). Escutelo marrón oscuro con áreas claras. Un par de cerdas preescutelares. Distancia entre las cerdas escutelares apicales 86(77-94)% de la distancia entre las cerdas apicales y basales; cerdas escutelares basales paralelas. Índice escutelar 0.88 (0.86-0.93). Cerda esternopleural media 1/5 de la cerda esternopleural anterior. Índice esterno 0.87 (0.78-0.92). Patas con fÉmur y tibia marrón oscuro, los segmentos tarsales marrón amarillentos. + + + +Figs 22-24. + +Drosophila cumanda + +sp. nov. +, paratipos: 22, ♀, vista lateral del cuerpo; 23, ♂, vista dorsal del cuerpo (Escala: - 1 mm); 24, ♂, edeago y parafisis, vista lateral. (Escala: 0.05 mm). + + + + +Figs 25-31. + +Drosophila cumanda + +sp. nov. +, holotipo ♂: 25, epandrio; 26, hipandrio y gonopodio; 27-29, edeago y paráfisis, vistas ventral, lateral y dorsal, respectivamente.Alotipo ♀: 30, oviscapto; 31, espermateca. (Escala: 0.1 mm). + + + +Alas. Marrón claro con la vena transversal radial-media (R-M) y la vena transversal media discal-cubital (dM-Cu) sombreadas. Primera sección costal con una hilera de dientes, parte apical de la primera sección costal es oscura (costal lappet). La vena radial R +4+5 +y vena media (M) convergentes ( +Fig. 23 +). Longitud del ala 3.97 (3.81-4.01) mm. Índices alares 2.06 (2.10-2.41); C=3.01 (3.12-3.40), ac=2.46 (2.22- 2.81), hb=0.60 (0.57-0.81), 4c=0.83 (0.78-0.93), 4v=1.73 (1.75-1.82), 5X=1.07 (1.07-1.16), M=0.45 (0.40-0.47) y proX. X=0.85 (0.78-0.89). + + +Abdomen. Marrón oscuro. Del primer tergito al sexto tergito pigmentados de color marrón oscuro casi en su totalidad, con una línea blanca e irregular a lo largo del borde posterior de los seis tergitos ( +Fig. 23 +). + + +Genitalia externa. Cerci parcialmente unida al epandrio. Epandrio en la parte dorsal microtricoso, sin cerdas, parte baja del epandrio con 25 cerdas y una proyección triangular y quitinizada sobre el surestilo. Surestilo ovalado, quitinizado, microtricoso, con 9 dientes primarios en el lado derecho y 10 en el izquierdo; no hay diferencia entre las cerdas marginales y dientes secundarios, 25 dientes secundarios y 15 marginales en ambos lados ( +Fig. 25 +). + + +Genitalia interna. Hipandrio en forma “V” con el borde quitinizado, sin arco dorsal, gonopodio quitinizado con una cerda larga ( +Fig. 26 +). Edeago quitinizado, en vista ventral y dorsal el extremo distal presenta un surco y termina en una punta quitinizada dirigida hacia la parte dorsal. Región dorsal del edeago con abertura dorsal y un par de proyecciones como alas. Apodema ancho y quitinizado. Rama ventral triangular, paráfisis ovalada con cuatro cerdas largas y una pequeÑa ( +Figs 24 +, +27-29 +). + + +Descripción de la hembra, +alotipo +y +paratipos +(individuos provenientes de isolínea conservados en alcohol). Morfología externa. Longitud total (cuerpo + alas) 5.30 (5.05-5.38) mm. Color del cuerpo marrón oscuro ( +Fig. 22 +). + +Medidas hembra Cabeza. Longitud frontal 0.52 (0.48- 0.59) mm. Índice frontal 0.96 (0.88-1.02). Triángulo ocelar, cerca del 57(49-64)% de la longitud frontal. Distancia de or3 a or1, 62(62-76)% de or3 a vtm, radio or1/or3 0.90 (0.77-0.88), radio or2/or1 0.35 (0.33-0.47), cerda postocelar 48 (50-62) % y cerda ocelar 82(80-91)% de la longitud frontal; índice vt 0.94 (0.92-1.03); índice vibrisal 0.84 (0.78-0.93). Índice genal 5.11 (4.72-5.09). Índice del ojo 2.00 (1.92-1.98). + +Tórax ( +Fig. 22 +). Longitud 1.65 (1.42-1.65) mm. Índice h 1.27 (1.05-1.35). Distancia transversal de las cerdas dorsocentrales 275(271-280)% de la distancia longitudinal. Índice dc 0.98 (0.85-0.98). Distancia entre las cerdas escutelares apicales 96(89-101)% de la distancia entre las cerdas apicales y basales; índice escutelar 0.85 (0.76-0.92); índice esterno 1.45 (1.12-1.46). + + +Alas ( +Fig. 22 +). Longitud 4.15 (4.08-4.55) mm. Índices alares 2.32 (2.29-2.35); C=3.23 (3.18-3.46), ac=2.54 (2.37-2.75), hb=0.64 (0.59-0.66), 4c=0.85 (0.81-0.90), 4v=1.77 (1.65-1.83), 5X=1.10 (0.96-1.20), M=0.48 (0.41- 0.54) y proX. X=0.82 (0.79-0.93). + + +Abdomen. Similar al macho ( +Fig. 22 +). + + +Genitalia. Oviscapto quitinizado y apicalmente redondeado con 11 ovisensillas marginales como dientes y tres ovisencillas marginales con punta redondeada; ocho ovisensillas discales como dientes; tres ovisensillas internas como tricomas y una subterminal, larga y ligeramente curvada ( +Fig. 30 +). Espermateca ligeramente quitinizada invaginación alcanza casi el borde superior, con estrías circulares en la parte inferior ( +Fig. 31 +). + + +Etimología. Esta especie es nombrada + +Drosophila cumanda + +en honor al pueblo de Cumandá cercano al lugar de colecta, +provincia de Napo +, +Ecuador +. + + +Distribución. Esta especie ha sido registrada únicamente en el bosque nublado de los andes orientales de la localidad tipo (Cumandá, +Napo +). + + +Ecología. Esta especie emergió con la especie + +D +. +aracataca + +del cebo de banano y levadura, utilizado en el campo para la captura de las moscas. + + +Relación morfológica con otras especies. + +Drosophila cumanda + +sp. nov. +pertenece al grupo + +D +. +annulimana + +. Esta especie presenta características morfológicas comunes con + +D +. +aracataca + +, + +D +. +annulimana + +, + +D +. +araicas + +y + +Drosophila aragua +Vilela & Pereira, 1982 + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/91/87/039187DFAC353F21D8432BB3FE60FDBC.xml b/data/03/91/87/039187DFAC353F21D8432BB3FE60FDBC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..63935d6a24e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/91/87/039187DFAC353F21D8432BB3FE60FDBC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,303 @@ + + + +Cuatro especies nuevas del género Drosophila (Diptera, Drosophilidae) en las provincias de Pichincha, Napo y Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Ecuador + + + +Author + +Llangarí-Arizo, Luz M. + + + +Author + +Rafael, Violeta + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2018 + +e 2018040 + + +2018-11-29 + + +108 + + +1 +13 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2018040 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2018040 +1678-4766 +13265844 + + + + + + + +Drosophila valenteae + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs 1-11 +, +16-18 +) + + + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +057B1750-E6A1-41B7-91D3- 0E4CB74E8309 + + + + +Material +tipo. +Holotipo +♂ +(montado en seco, genitalia en microtubo), +Ecuador +, +Pichincha +, +Sangolquí +(Cashapamba, +0°19’59.3”S +, +78°25’51”W +, 2417 msnm), + +VII.2013 + +, +V +. +Rafael +col. + +, + +L. M. Llangarí +& +V +. +Rafael +det. ( +QCAZI 3142 +); +alotipo +♀ +(montado en seco, genitalia en microtubo), los mismos datos del +holotipo +( +QCAZI 3152 +); +paratipos +: +9♂ +, +9♀ +(montados en seco, genitalia en microtubo), mismos datos del +holotipo +( +QCAZI 3133-3141 +, +3143-3151 +) + +. + +Diagnosis. Tórax marrón oscuro con seis hileras de pelos acrosticales entre las dorsocentrales anteriores. Cerdas escutelares basales divergentes. La vena transversal radial-media (R-M) y la vena transversal media discal-cubital (dM-Cu) ligeramente sombreadas. Edeago recto tubular, parte distal membranosa con microproyecciones a modo de espina en el lado ventral, membranas de la parte dorsal expandidas con puntos refringentes. + +Descripción del macho, +holotipo +y +paratipos +(individuos descritos en vivo, provenientes de isolínea). Morfología eXterna. Longitud total (cuerpo + alas) 4.05 (3.96- 4.10) mm. Color del cuerpo marrón. + + +Cabeza. Frente marrón claro. Longitud frontal 0.32 (0.28-0.39) mm. Índice frontal 0.94 (0.92-0.95). Triángulo frontal marrón oscuro. Triángulo ocelar marrón claro, cerca del 37(36–38)% de la longitud, ocelos amarillo oscuro. Placa orbital marrón; la cerda orbital media cerca de la orbital anterior y ligeramente hacia el borde exterior de la placa orbital, distancia de or3 a or1, 90(88-91)% de or3 a vtm, radio or1/or3 0.76 (0.69-0.77), radio or2/or1 0.35 (0.33-0.37), cerda postocelar 56(54-58)% y cerda ocelar 72(71-73)% de la longitud frontal; índice vt 1.25 (1.23-1.29); índice vibrisal 0.70 (0.69-0.72). +Frontal vitta +marrón. Gena y postgena marrón claro; índice genal 4.01 (3.10-4.93). Carina marrón claro, ligeramente prominente, no surcada. Proboscis marrón claro. Ojos de color rojo vinoso, índice del ojo 1.40 (1.32-1.53). Segundo y tercer segmento antenal marrón oscuro. Arista plumosa con cinco ramas dorsales, tres ventrales, más la terminal bifurcada. + +TóraX. Marrón oscuro, longitud 1.13 (1.10-1.27) mm. Índice h 1.20 (1.10-1.40). Seis hileras de pelos acrosticales entre las cerdas dorsocentrales anteriores. Distancia transversal de las cerdas dorsocentrales 218 (215-221) % de la distancia longitudinal, índice dc 0.76 (0.72-0.79). Escutelo del mismo color que el tórax, distancia entre las cerdas escutelares apicales 78(75-80)% de la distancia entre las cerdas apicales y basales. Cerdas escutelares basales divergentes; índice escutelar 1.23 (1.20-1.28). Cerda esternopleural media ligeramente más pequeña que la cerda esternopleural anterior; índice esterno 0.51 (0.49-0.56). Patas amarillas. +Alas. Color beige con la vena transversal radial-media (R-M) y la vena transversal media discal-cubital (dM-Cu) ligeramente sombreadas. Longitud del ala 2.55 (2.50-2.87) mm. Índices alares 2.21 (2.19-2.73); C=3.80 (3.75-4.10), ac=2.00 (1.84-2.20), hb=0.25 (0.21-0.33), 4c=0.61 (0.57-0.65), 4v=1.47 (1.36-1.54), 5X=1.34 (1.28-1.36), M=0.46 (0.39- 0.49) y proX. X=0.43 (0.38-0.50). +Abdomen. Marrón amarillento, con línea media dorsal. Del primer al quinto tergito con una franja oscura de forma irregular que se adelgaza hacia los lados; seXto tergito sin línea media dorsal y en el centro con una mancha oscura en forma de trapecio. + +Genitalia externa. Cerci libres, parte baja del epandrio con seis cerdas, lóbulo inferior del epandrio con dos cerdas, parte dorsal microtricosa sin cerdas. Surestilo no microtricoso, con ocho (7-8) dientes primarios; lado derecho con cuatro dientes secundarios (4-5) y lado izquierdo con cinco dientes secundarios (4-5) y ocho cerdas marginales (6-8) ( +Fig. 1 +). + + + +Figs 1-7. + +Drosophila valenteae + +sp. nov. +, holotipo ♂: 1, epandrio; 2, hipandrio y gonopodio; 3-5, edeago y paráfisis, vistas ventral, lateral y dorsal, respectivamente.Alotipo ♀: 6, espermateca; 7, oviscapto. (Escala: 0.1 mm). + + + +Genitalia interna. Hipandrio en forma de escudo con el contorno quitinizado, gonopodio poco quitinizado con una cerda, arco dorsal sostenido por dos formaciones quitinosas ( +Fig. 2 +). Edeago recto tubular, parte distal eXpandida, con tres dientes a cada lado y microproyecciones, parte dorsal con una lámina membranosa con puntos refringentes. Paráfisis unida al gonopodio, con una cerda ( +Figs 3-5 +, +16 y 17 +). + + +Descripción de la hembra, +alotipo +y +paratipos +(individuos descritos en vivo, proveniente de isolínea). Morfología eXterna. Longitud total (cuerpo + alas) 4.10 (4.05- 4.35) mm. Color del cuerpo marrón ( +Fig. 8 +). + +Medidas hembra Cabeza. Longitud frontal 0.37 (0.35- 0.41) mm. Índice frontal 0.84 (0.81-0.89). Triángulo ocelar, cerca del 40.50(37.20-42.30)% de la longitud frontal. Distancia de or3 a or1, 75%(72-82)% de or3 a vtm, radio or1/or3 0.92 (0.87-0.95), radio or2/or1 0.30 (0.27-0.33); cerda postocelar 57(54-60)% y cerda ocelar 72(71-73)% de la longitud frontal; índice vt 1.25 (1.23-1.29); índice vibrisal 0.81 (0.73-0.85). Índice genal 3.90 (3.50-4.70). Índice del ojo 1.15 (1.09-1.23). + + +Figs 8-15. Morfología eXterna de + +D +. +valenteae + +sp. nov. +y + +D +. +griseolineata +Duda, 1927 + +. + +Drosophila valenteae + +sp. nov. +, paratipo ♀: 8, vista lateral del cuerpo; 9, tóraX, vista dorsal; 10, ala derecha; 11, abdomen, vista dorsal. + +Drosophila griseolineata + +♀ (espÉcimen proveniente de Porto Alegre, Brasil): 12, vista lateral del cuerpo; 13, tóraX, vista dorsal; 14, ala derecha; 15, abdomen, vista dorsal. (Escala: 0.5 mm). + + + + +Figs 16-21. Genitalia de + +D +. +valenteae + +sp. nov. +y + +D +. +griseolineata +Duda, 1927 + +. + +Drosophila valenteae + +sp. nov. +, paratipo ♂, edeago y paráfisis: 16, vista ventral; 17, vista lateral; 18, paratipo ♀, espermateca. + +Drosophila griseolineata +Duda, 1927 + +, ♂, edeago, paráfisis y gonopodio: 19, vista ventral; 20, vista lateral; 21, ♀, espermateca. (Escala: 0.05 mm). + + + +Tórax ( +Fig. 9 +). Longitud 1.24 (1.16-1.32) mm. Índice h 1.23 (1.17-1.33). Distancia transversal de las cerdas dorsocentrales 190 (183-213) % de la distancia longitudinal. Índice dc 0.62 (0.057-0.69). Distancia entre las cerdas escutelares apicales 69(65-76)% de la distancia entre las cerdas apicales y basales. Índice escutelar 1.24 (1.21-1.30); índice esterno 0.52 (0.48-0.57). + + +Abdomen. Similar al del macho ( +Fig. 11 +). + + +Alas. Color beige, longitud 2.90 (2.75-2.95) mm ( +Fig. 11 +). Índices alares 2.41 (2.36-2.69); C=4.57 (4.46-4.73), ac=2.1 (1.95-2.35), hb=0.29 (0.21-0.35), 4c=0.52 (0.48-0.59), 4v=1.37 (1.30-1.44), 5X=1.23 (1.17-1.129), M=0.41 (0.37- 0.47) y proX. X=0.45 (0.39-0.51). + + +Genitalia. Oviscapto alargado, poco quitinizado y apicalmente redondeado con 14 ovisensillas marginales con punta afilada y cuatro con punta redondeada; seis ovisensillas discales como dientes; tres ovisensillas internas como tricomas y una subterminal, larga y ligeramente curvada ( +Fig. 7 +). Espermateca poco quitinizada en forma de globo con invaginación que alcanza 2/3 partes, presenta estrías en la parte eXterna ( +Figs 6 +, +18 +). + + +Etimología. El nombre específico de + +Drosophila valenteae + +es en honor a la Dra. Vera Lúcia da Silva Valente profesora de la Universidad Federal +Rio Grande do Sul +, +Brasil +, quien ha hecho grandes contribuciones al conocimiento de las drosófilas. + + +Distribución. Esta especie ha sido capturada solo en la localidad tipo (Cashapamba, +Pichincha +). + + +Relación morfológica con otras especies. + +Drosophila valenteae + +sp. nov. +es similar a nivel de la morfología externa, morfología del edeago y espermateca con + +Drosophila griseolineata + +, por lo tanto estas especies estarían emparentadas ( +Figs 8-15 +, +16-21 +). También comparte algunas características de la morfología externa con + +Drosophila maculifrons +Duda, 1927 + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/91/87/039187DFAC3D3F2FDAD22AD5FAA5FE33.xml b/data/03/91/87/039187DFAC3D3F2FDAD22AD5FAA5FE33.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cb6bdfd664a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/91/87/039187DFAC3D3F2FDAD22AD5FAA5FE33.xml @@ -0,0 +1,257 @@ + + + +Cuatro especies nuevas del género Drosophila (Diptera, Drosophilidae) en las provincias de Pichincha, Napo y Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Ecuador + + + +Author + +Llangarí-Arizo, Luz M. + + + +Author + +Rafael, Violeta + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2018 + +e 2018040 + + +2018-11-29 + + +108 + + +1 +13 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2018040 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2018040 +1678-4766 +13265844 + + + + + + + +Drosophila tinalandia + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs 41-50 +) + + + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +0A66E0BD-FD8B-421A-BEB0- 756723A0126C + + + + +Material +tipo. +Holotipo +♂ +(montado en seco, genitalia en microtubo), +Ecuador +, +Santo Domingo +de los +Colorados +, +Tinalandia +( +0°18’34ˮS +, +79°03’00ˮW +, 660 msnm), + +VII.2013 + +, +V +. +Rafael +col. + +, + +L. M. Llangarí +& +V +. +Rafael +det. ( +QCAZI 3131 +); +alotipo +♀ +(montado en seco, genitalia en microtubo), los mismos datos del +holotipo +( +QCAZI 3130 +); +paratipos +: +♂ +, +♀ +(montados en seco, genitalia en microtubo), los mismos datos del +holotipo +( +QCAZI 3132 +, +3129 +) + +. + + + +Figs 41-43. + +Drosophila tinalandia + +sp. nov. +, paratipos: 41, ♀, tóraX, vista dorsal (espÉcimen seco); 42, ♀, ala derecha (Escala: – 0.5 mm); 43, ♂, edeago y paráfisis, vista lateral. (Escala: 0.05 mm). + + + + +Figs 44-50. + +Drosophila tinalandia + +sp. nov. +, holotipo ♂: 44, epandrio; 45, hipandrio y gonopodio; 46-48, edeago y paráfisis, vistas ventral, lateral y dorsal, respectivamente; Alotipo ♀: 49, oviscapto; 50; espermateca. (Escala: 0.1 mm). + + +Diagnosis. Cuerpo marrón. Arista plumosa con ocho ramas dorsales, tres ventrales. Tórax con una banda más clara en el centro y con ocho hileras de pelos acrosticales entre las dorsocentrales anteriores. Cerdas escutelares basales paralelas. Cerda esternopleural media 1/5 de la cerda esternopleural anterior. Epandrio y cerci microtricosos. Edeago quitinizado curvado hacia la parte ventral, parte distal ensanchado, parte dorsal redondeado con la parte ventral que termina en punta. + +Descripción del macho, +holotipo +(individuo conservado en alcohol). Morfología externa. Longitud total (cuerpo + alas) del +holotipo +5.11 mm +. Color del cuerpo marrón. + + +Cabeza. Frente marrón amarillenta ( +Fig. 41 +). Longitud frontal +0.47 mm +. Índice frontal 0.87. Triángulo frontal amarillo polinoso. Triángulo ocelar marrón oscuro, cerca del 45 % de la longitud, ocelos amarillos polinosos. Placa orbital marrón amarillenta; cerda orbital media cerca de la orbital anterior y hacia el borde exterior de la placa orbital, distancia de or3 a or1, 63 % de or3 a vtm, radio or1/or3 0.82, radio or2/or1 0.48, cerda postocelar 68 % y cerda ocelar 81 % de la longitud frontal; índice vt 1.38. Índice vibrisal 0.83. +Frontal vitta +, gena y postgena amarillas polinosas. Índice genal 5.20. Una cerda oral bien desarrollada. Carina amarilla polinosa, prominente, no surcada. Proboscis y palpos amarillo oscuro. Ojos de color rojo vinoso, índice del ojo 1.3. Arista plumosa con ocho ramas dorsales, tres ventrales, más la terminal bifurcada. + + +Tórax. Marrón polinoso (dorado) con una banda más clara a lo largo de las cerdas dorsocentrales y en la parte media del tóraX, longitud +1.71 mm +( +Fig. 41 +). Índice h 1.13. Ocho hileras de pelos acrosticales entre las cerdas dorsocentrales anteriores. Distancia transversal de las cerdas dorsocentrales 266% de la distancia longitudinal. Índice dc 0.73. Escutelo del mismo color que el tóraX, distancia entre las cerdas escutelares apicales 58 % de la distancia entre las cerdas apicales y basales. Cerdas escutelares basales paralelas; índice escutelar 0.83. Cerda esternopleural media 1/5 de la esternopleural anterior; índice esterno 0.84. Patas con el fémur y la tibia marrón, segmentos tarsales marrón amarillento. + + +Alas. Marrón amarillento ( +Fig. 42 +). Longitud del ala +3.27 mm +. Índices alares 2.27; C= 2.66, ac= 2.17, hb= 0.77, 4c=0.80, 4v=1.53, 5X=1.08, M=0.40 y proX. X=0.43. + +Abdomen. Color marrón. Primer tergito marrón amarillento. Del segundo al cuarto tergito con línea media dorsal. Quinto y seXto tergito marrón. + +Genitalia externa. Epandrio extremadamente microtricoso. Cerci microtricoso y parcialmente unidas al epandrio. Parte baja del epandrio con trece cerdas. Surestilo microtricoso con 12 dientes primarios y 11-12 cerdas marginales en cada lado ( +Fig. 44 +). + + +Genitalia interna. Hipandrio ligeramente más pequeño que el epandrio, y en forma de escudo con el contorno quitinizado, gonopodio voluminoso ( +Fig. 45 +). Edeago quitinizado, ápice ensanchado, redondeado, curvado hacia la parte ventral y terminando en punta. Paráfisis triangular. Rama ventral bien desarrollada. Apodema más corto que el edeago y lateralmente ancho ( +Figs 43 +, +46-48 +). + + +Descripción de la hembra, +alotipo +(individuo descrito en vivo). Morfología externa. Longitud total (cuerpo + alas) del +alotipo +4.84 mm +. Color del cuerpo marrón. + + +Medidas e índices hembra: Cabeza. Longitud frontal +0.46 mm +. Índice frontal 0.88. Triángulo ocelar cerca del 39 % de la longitud frontal. Distancia de or3 a or1, 57% de or3 a vtm, radio or1/or3 0.80, radio or2/or1 0.48, cerda postocelar 59% y cerda ocelar 83% de la longitud frontal; índice vt 0.90; índice vibrisal 0.84. Índice genal 5.06. Índice del ojo 1.15. + + +TóraX. Longitud +1.45 mm +. Índice h 1.22. Distancia transversal de las cerdas dorsocentrales 245% de la distancia longitudinal. Índice dc 0.73. Distancia entre las cerdas escutelares apicales 57% de la distancia entre las cerdas apicales y basales; índice escutelar 0.95; índice esterno 0.86. + + +Alas. Longitud +3.04 mm +. Índice alar 2.17; C= 2.65, ac= 2.25, hb=0.67, 4c=0.80, 4v=1.42, 5X=1.12, M=0.41 y proX. X= 0.46. + + +Genitalia. Oviscapto quitinizado, alargado, apicalmente en punta con 19 ovisensillas marginales con punta redondeada; cinco ovisensillas discales con punta redondea; tres ovisencillas pequeÑas como tricomas y una ovisencilla más larga ( +Fig. 49 +). Espermateca ligeramente quitinizada en forma de campana con invaginación que alcanza 2/3 partes ( +Fig. 50 +). + + +Etimología. El nombre de + +Drosophila tinalandia + +sp. nov. +hace referencia al lugar de captura, Tinalandia es una localidad de la +provincia de Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas +. + + +Distribución. Esta especie ha sido registrada en el bosque nublado de la localidad tipo (Tinalandia, +Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas +). + + +Ecología. Esta especie fue recolectada directamente de las inflorescencias de + +Xanthosoma +spp. + +( +Araceae +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/9F/87/039F87F0040BC624FF15FA22C0631F70.xml b/data/03/9F/87/039F87F0040BC624FF15FA22C0631F70.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..45ac9b4ce11 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/9F/87/039F87F0040BC624FF15FA22C0631F70.xml @@ -0,0 +1,287 @@ + + + +On the definition of Tapeinini, and description of a new genus and species (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) + + + +Author + +Santos-Silva, Antonio + + + +Author + +Nascimento, Francisco E. de L. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019023 + + +2019-07-15 + + +109 + + +1 +8 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019023 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019023 +1678-4766 +13265976 +CDD35D60-6B86-4A7C-A9C8-CCF781224E8C + + + + + + + +Wappesicus +Santos-Silva & Nascimento + +, +gen. nov. + + + + + + +Etymology. Latin, sufix “- +icus +” (belonging to), added to the surname of James E. Wappes. Masculine gender. + + +Type +species. + +Wappesicus wappesi + +sp. nov. +, here designated. + +Description, female. Body moderate-sized, flattened. Head not retractile; frons transverse, not forming transverse plate, slightly convex close to clypeus, V-shaped, centrally depressed toward vertex. Gena distinctly shorter than lower eye lobe. Eyes coarsely faceted; distance between upper eye lobes distinctly larger than twice width of one upper eye lobe. Outer side of mandibles with large triangular depression, with its apex surpassing middle of mandible. Last maxillary and labial palpomeres gradually narrowed toward apex. Antennal tubercles not forming plate laterally on scape ball. Antennae filiform, shorter than body; scape longer than antennomere III, slightly piriform, not reaching middle of prothorax; antennomeres III and IV subequal in shape and length. Prothorax transverse, with distinct, wide posterior constriction; sides strongly divergent from anterolateral angles to acute lateral tubercle, then strongly convergent toward base of posterior constriction. Procoxal cavities closed posteriorly. Prosternum slightly transversely sulcate near base of prosternal process. Prosternal process wide, with narrowest area slightly narrow than procoxal cavity, very slightly more elevated than surface of prosternum, strongly widened from middle toward apex, which is laterally lobeshaped, and with posterior margin widely concave; posterior half inverted V-shaped depressed centrally. Mesoventral process wide, moderately narrowed centrally (narrowest area about as wide as procoxal cavity). Mesocoxal cavities closed, but with apex of mesoventrite distinctly not touching apex of metaventrite. Scutellum proportionally small, posteriorly rounded. Elytra slightly longer than 1.5 time humeral width; parallel-sided from humerus to slightly after middle, then gradually, round narrowed toward sutural angle. Femora fusiform. Abdominal ventrite V strongly inverted, V-shaped and centrally depressed, with distal margin of this area narrowly elevated (plate-shaped). + +Remarks. + +Wappesicus + +gen. nov. +is similar to + +Peritapnia + +but differs as follows: prosternal and mesoventral processes nearly as wide as the pro- and mesocoxal cavities ( +Fig. 21 +); scape more elongate, not distinctly piriform ( +Figs 19, 20 +); femora fusiform ( +Fig. 21 +). In + +Peritapnia + +, the prosternal and mesoventral processes are distinctly narrower than procoxal cavities ( +Figs 2, 7 +), scape distinctly piriform ( +Figs 4, 8 +), and the femora are pedunculate-clavate ( +Figs 2, 6 +). + +Wappesicus + +gen. nov. +differs from + +Tapeina + +by the antennae ( +Fig. 20 +) shorter than body [longer ( +Fig. 18 +) in female of + +Tapeina + +], scape slightly piriform, not reaching middle of prothorax [cylindrical ( +Fig. 18 +), reaching middle of prothorax in + +Tapeina + +], and prothorax ( +Fig. 20 +) with acute lateral tubercle [rounded ( +Fig. 18 +) in + +Tapeina + +]. + + + + +Wappesicus wappesi +Santos-Silva & Nascimento + +, +sp. nov. + + + +( +Figs 19–22 +) + +Description, female. Head dark mostly reddish brown; narrow area surrounding eyes, distal area of genae, distal area of postclypeus, and median groove on frons dark brown; gulamentum reddish brown, gradually lighter toward posterior area; antennae dark reddish brown; mouthparts mostly light reddish brown, with palpomeres mostly yellowish brown; mandibles dark reddish brown on basal half, black on posterior half. Pronotum mostly dark reddish brown, narrowly dark brown anteriorly and posteriorly. Prosternum and prosternal process light reddish brown, slightly darker in sides of prosternum, with margins darkened. Central area of mesoventrite and mesoventral process light reddish brown, and sides of mesoventrite, mesanepisternum and mesepimeron dark reddish brown (margins of the ventrites narrowly darkened). Metaventrite mostly light reddish brown, + + +On the definition of +Tapeinini +, and description of a new genus... S- S& N + + + + +Figs 1–8. Species of + +Peritapnia + +. + +Peritapnia nudicornis +(Bates, 1885) + +, female: 1, dorsal habitus; 2, ventral habitus; 3, lateral habitus; 4, head, frontal view. + +Peritapnia fabra +Horn, 1894 + +, male: 5, head, frontal view; 6, dorsal habitus; 7, ventral habitus; 8, lateral habitus. Scale bar = 2.0 mm. + + +gradually darker toward sides. Scutellum reddish brown centrobasally, brown laterally. Elytra mostly dark brown, with part of sutural margin dark reddish brown. Femora mostly dark reddish brown, with darkened irregular areas. Tibiae dark brown basally, gradually dark reddish brown toward apex. Tarsi mostly dark reddish brown, with darkened irregular areas. Abdominal ventrites mostly dark reddish brown, slightly darker laterally, and dark brown on distal area of ventrites I–IV. + +Head. Frons ( +Fig. 19 +) finely, abundantly punctate, with coarser punctures interspersed, from which emerges erect, long thick dark setae; with bristly, semidecumbent yellowish-brown setae not obscuring integument. Vertex with sculpturing, erect and bristly setae as on frons, area adjacent to prothorax with coarser punctures and erect setae, + + + +On the definition of +Tapeinini +, and description of a new genus... S- S& N + + + + +Figs 9–16. + +Tapeina coronata +Lepeletier & Audinet-Serville, 1828 + +. Male: 9, dorsal habitus; 10, ventral habitus; 11, lateral habitus; 12, head, frontal view. Female: 13, head, frontal view; 14, dorsal habitus; 15, ventral habitus; 16, lateral habitus. Scale bar = 2.0 mm. + + +but bristly, semidecumbent yellowish-brown setae nearly absent. Area behind upper eye lobes tumid close to eye; finely, densely punctate (distinctly less so toward prothoracic margin), with slightly coarser punctures interspersed; with a few moderately long, erect, thick dark setae on tumid area; yellowish-brown pubescence adjacent to tumid area, gradually glabrous toward prothorax. Area behind lower eye lobes tumid close to eye; with sculpturing as in area + + +On the definition of +Tapeinini +, and description of a new genus... S- S& N + + + + +Figs 17–22. + +Tapeina rudifrons +Marinoni, 1972: 17 + +, paratype female, dorsal habitus; 18, female from Bolivia, dorsal habitus. + +Wappesicus wappesi + +gen. nov., sp. nov +, holotype female: 19, head, frontal view; 20, dorsal habitus; 21, ventral habitus; 22, lateral habitus. Scale bar = 2.0 mm. + + +behind upper eye lobes superiorly, gradually sparser toward ventral area; with bristly yellowish-brown pubescence close to upper eye lobes, gradually glabrous toward ventral side; with long, erect, thick dark setae close to eye, especially in central area. Genae minutely rugose-punctate except smooth distal area; with yellowish-brown pubescence not obscuring integument except glabrous smooth area; with long, erect, sparse, thick dark setae close to eye. Antennal tubercles with sculpturing, erect and bristly setae as on frons anteriorly, gradually sparsely punctate, with distinctly sparser erect and bristly setae toward posterior area. Median groove distinct on frons, slight distinct on vertex. Postclypeus narrow, transversely carina-shaped in wide central area; with long, erect, thick dark setae in wide central area (part of them gradually yellowish-brown toward apex); sides smooth glabrous. Labrum coplanar with anteclypeus in posterior third, inclined in anterior 2/3, more inclined in anterior third; with short, sparse yellowish-brown setae in anterior 2/3, and long, erect dark setae interspersed; with long, erect golden setae in anterior third, and fringe of dense golden setae in anterior margin. Gulamentum smooth, glabrous posteriorly; depressed finely striate-punctate, with short, sparse, erect yellowish-brown setae adjacent to anterior elevation; with sparse, long, erect, thick dark setae in anterior elevation. Distance between upper eye lobes 0.7 times length of scape; in frontal view, distance between lower eye lobes about equal to length of scape. Antennae 1.25 time elytral length, almost reaching elytral apex; with short, decumbent yellowish-brown pubescence not obscuring integument, gradually shorter, yellowish-white toward distal segments. Scape with sparse, long, erect, thick dark setae throughout. Pedicel with sparse, long, erect, thick brown setae throughout, longer ventrally. Antennomeres III–VII with sparse, long, erect brown setae ventrally, and similar setae dorsally and laterally near apex, and sparse, short, erect yellowish-brown setae throughout. Antennomeres VIII–X with sparse, long, erect brown setae near apex, and sparse, short, erect yellowish-brown setae throughout.Antennomere XI with sparse, short, erect yellowish-brown setae throughout. Antennal formula (ratio) based on length of antennomere III: scape = 1.40; pedicel = 0.47; IV = 1.03; V = 0.97; VI = 0.94; VII = 0.94; VIII = 0.90; IX = 0.90; X = 0.90; XI = 1.09. + +Thorax. Pronotum moderately tumid in anterior 2/3 (except narrow area close to anterior margin), with one wide, subcircular, slightly elevated gibbosity each side, and one elongate gibbosity centrally, nearly fused with lateral ones; minutely, abundantly punctate, with coarser punctures interspersed (absent in lateral gibbosities), except smooth central gibbosity; with yellowish-brown pubescence not obscuring integument, except glabrous central gibbosity; with long, erect, thick, dark setae emerging from part of coarser punctures ( +Fig. 20 +). Sides of prothorax with yellowish-brown pubescence not obscuring integument, with sparse, long, erect dark setae (shorter than in pronotum). Prosternum minutely, sparsely punctate centrally, slightly striate-punctate laterally; with sparse, short, decumbent yellowish pubescence, slightly more abundant laterally, with long, erect, dark setae interspersed. Prosternal process with yellowish pubescence as on central area of prosternum, with long, erect, thick dark setae basally and close to lateral margins, not reaching distal area. Ventral surface of mesothorax with yellowish pubescence not obscuring integument, with sparse, long, erect, thick dark setae in sides of mesoventrite and lateral margins of mesoventral process. Ventral surface of metathorax with yellowish pubescence not obscuring integument, sparser toward central area of metaventrite; with sparse, long, erect, thick dark setae in sides and posterocentral area of metaventrite, and sparse, long, erect yellowish setae laterally ( +Fig. 21 +). Scutellum with sparse yellowish-brown setae, forming fringe with denser setae along margins (longer toward centrodistal apex). Elytra coarsely, abundantly punctate throughout; with short, decumbent yellowish-brown pubescence not obscuring integument, with abundant, long, erect, thick dark setae throughout ( +Fig. 22 +); erect setae not emerging from the punctures. Legs: femora and tibiae with abundant yellowish pubescence not obscuring integument, with long, erect, thick, dark setae interspersed. + +Abdomen. Ventrites minutely, abundantly punctate, with coarser punctures interspersed; with yellowish pubescence not obscuring integument; with long, erect, thick, dark setae emerging from coarser punctures. Ventrite V triangularly depressed posteriorly. +Dimensions (mm). Total length, 8.50; prothoracic length, 1.60; anterior prothoracic width in anterior constriction, 1.75; anterior prothoracic width before anterior constriction, 2.10; posterior prothoracic width, 2.05; maximum prothoracic width, 2.85; humeral width, 3.60; elytral length, 6.00. + +Type material. + +Holotype +female from +BOLIVIA +, +Santa Cruz +: + +20 km +N Camiri Rd + +to +Eyti +( + +6.8 km +E Hwy + +9; + +1250 m + +; +19°52’S +/ +63°29’W +), + +8–9.XII.2015 + +, +Wappes +, +Kuckartz +and +Skillman +col. ( +FSCA +, formerly +ACMT +). + + +Etymology. The new species is dedicated to our friend James E. Wappes (ACMT). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/9F/87/039F87F0040FC625FC0BFB39C6A21A79.xml b/data/03/9F/87/039F87F0040FC625FC0BFB39C6A21A79.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a3421d16413 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/9F/87/039F87F0040FC625FC0BFB39C6A21A79.xml @@ -0,0 +1,259 @@ + + + +On the definition of Tapeinini, and description of a new genus and species (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) + + + +Author + +Santos-Silva, Antonio + + + +Author + +Nascimento, Francisco E. de L. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019023 + + +2019-07-15 + + +109 + + +1 +8 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019023 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019023 +1678-4766 +13265976 +CDD35D60-6B86-4A7C-A9C8-CCF781224E8C + + + + + + + +Tapeina rudifrons +Marinoni, 1972 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 17, 18 +) + + + + + + + +Tapeina rudifrons +MARINONI, 1972:30 + + +; + +ZAJCIW, 1974:72 + +(distr.); + + +MARINONI +et al. +, 1992:111 + + +( +paratype +); MONNÉ, 1994:49 (cat.); + +MONNÉ & GIESBERT, 1994:183 + +(checklist); + + +JULIO +et al. +, 2000:50 + + +( +holotype +); + +DI IORIO, 2004:54 + +(distr.); + +MONNÉ, 2005:649 + +(cat.); + +MONNÉ & HOVORE, 2006:297 + +(checklist); + + +WAPPES +et al. +, 2006:24 + + +(distr.); + + +MARTINS +et al. +, 2011:291 + + +(distr.); + + +WAPPES +et al. +, 2013:12 + + +(distr.); + +MONNÉ & MONNÉ, 2016:73 + +( +holotype +); + +MOURA & VON GROLL, 2017:456 + +( +paratype +); + +MONNÉ, 2018:883 + +(cat.). + + + +This species was originally described from +Brazil +( +Goiás +, +Mato Grosso do Sul +, +Espírito Santo +, +São Paulo +), +Paraguay +( +Concepción +), and +Argentina +( +Salta +, +Formosa +, +Santiago del Estero +). +DI IORIO (2004) +reported the species for the Paraguayan department of Alto Paraguay; + +WAPPES +et al. +(2006) + +recorded the species in the Bolivian department of Santa Cruz; + +WAPPES +et al. +(2013) + +listed it in the Bolivian department of Tarija; and + +MARTINS +et al. +(2011) + +recorded it in the Brazilian state of Maranhão. Originally, +MARINONI (1972) +listed some +paratypes +as being from the Brazilian state of Mato Grosso, which was true at that time. However, currently, the places where those +paratypes +were collected are in the Brazilian state of +Mato Grosso do Sul +. + + + + + +We are taking this opportunity to illustrate a +paratype +female ( +Fig. 17 +), and another female ( +Fig. 18 +) collected in +Bolivia +. Although +MARINONI (1972) +had drawings of females, only a frontal view photograph of the head of a female +paratype +has been published + +. + + + +Material +examined (only the specimen from Bolivia listed) +BOLIVIA +, +Santa Cruz +: +Florida +(Pampagrande), +1 female +, + +23.XI.1995 + +, +F. A. Langer +col. ( +ACMT +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/AB/87/03AB87DE9758FFCFFC1D884DFD2EAB48.xml b/data/03/AB/87/03AB87DE9758FFCFFC1D884DFD2EAB48.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c5a17e20e75 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/AB/87/03AB87DE9758FFCFFC1D884DFD2EAB48.xml @@ -0,0 +1,672 @@ + + + +First record of the tarantula genus Euathlus (Araneae: Theraphosidae: Theraphosinae) in Peru, with the description of a threatened new species + + + +Author + +Quispe-Colca, Oscar M. + + + +Author + +Ferretti, Nelson + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2021 + +e 2021026 + + +2021-11-01 + + +111 + + +1 +10 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2021026 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2021026 +1678-4766 +13266054 +57FA4A7A-25B5-4589-8297-0E4A1221B480 + + + + + + + +Euathlus vanessae + +sp. nov. + + + + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:4D20 +CAD +2-887E- + + + +4B7A-8762-93DAEB8AA220 + +Figs 1-19 +, +Tabs I +, II + + + +Figs 1, 2. + +Euathlus vanessae + +sp. nov. +, +habitus +, dorsal view: 1, male holotype (MUSA-AR 234) Moquegua, Mariscal Nieto, Moquegua; 2, female paratype (MUSA-AR 228) from queñua relicts ( + +Polylepis besseri +Hieron + +), Asana, Torata, Mariscal Nieto, Moquegua. Photos by O. M. Quispe-Colca. + + + + +Figs 3-5. + +Euathlus vanessae + +sp. nov. +, male holotype (MUSA-AR 234), morphology of left palpal bulb: 3, ventral view; 4, prolateral view; 5, retrolateral view. The boxes indicate the apical embolus: serrated edge with three teeth at PI (AK, accessorial keel; PI, prolateral inferior keel; PS, prolateral superior keel). Scale bar = 1 mm. + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♂ +, +PERU +: +Moquegua +, +Mariscal Nieto +, +Moquegua +, +17°12’33.67”S +, +70°37’49.36”W +, + +3589 m +a.s.l. + +, + +09.IX.2020 + +, +O. M. Quispe-Colca +col. ( +MUSA-AR 234 +) + +. + +Paratypes +, +PERU +: +Moquegua +, +Mariscal Nieto +, +Torata + +: + +♀ +, +Asana +, in +Queñua +relicts and forest ( + +Polylepis besseri +Hieron + +), +17°08’56.43”S +, +70°34’18.36”W +, + +4153 m +a.s.l. + +, + +04.IX.2018 + +, +O.M. Quispe-Colca +col. ( +MUSA-AR 227 +) + +; + +♀ +, same collection data as for preceding, + +05.IX.2018 + +, +O.M. Quispe-Colca +col. ( +MUSA-AR 228 +) + +; + +♀ +, +17°09’43.00”S +, +70°43’25.37”W +, + +3632 m +a.s.l. + +, + +07.I.2019 + +, +O.M. Quispe-Colca +col. ( +MUSA-AR 230 +) + +; + +♀ +, +17°04’9.94”S +, +70°37’36.47”W +, + +3855 m +a.s.l. + +, + +26.II.2020 + +, +O.M. Quispe-Colca +col. ( +MUSA-AR 231 +) + +; + +♀ +, +17°07’30.86”S +, +70°42’27.78”W +, + +3535 m +a.s.l. + +, + +03.IX.2020 + +, +O.M. Quispe-Colca +col. ( +MUSA-AR 232 +) + +. + + + +Additional material examined +. +PERU +: +Moquegua +, +Mariscal Nieto +, +Torata +: +3 juveniles +, +Asana +, in +Queñua +relicts and forest ( + +Polylepis besseri +Hieron + +), +17°08’56.43”S +, +70°34’18.36”W +, + +4153 m +a.s.l. + +, + +05.IX.2018 + +, +O.M. Quispe-Colca +col. ( +MUSA-AR 229 +); +♂ +juvenile, same collection data as holotype ( +MUSA-AR 233 +) + +. + +Etymology. This species is named in honor of Vanessa Quequejana Puma, first author’s great friend, who collected the first specimen and for her great assistance during the fieldwork. + +Diagnosis. Male ( +Fig. 1 +) differs from all the known + +Euathlus +species + +(excepting + +E. grismadoi + +and + +E. manicata + +) by the copulatory bulb with a well-developed prolateral AK ( +Fig. 3 +). Additionally, male differs from + +E. manicata + +by the absence of spiniform setae on the first coxae and maxillae ( +Fig. 7 +), and from + +E. grismadoi + +by the presence of a serrated PI having three teeth ( +Figs 4, 5 +) and a higher number of labial cuspules (more than +70 in + +E. vanessae + +sp. nov. +and +24 in + +E. grismadoi + +). Male copulatory bulb resembles that of + +E. truculentus + +by the serrated PI (PERAFÁN & PÉREZ- Miles, 2014, +Fig. 8B +) but differs by the slender embolus, the presence of an AK and the more distance between PI and PS (PI and PS very close to each other in + +E. truculentus +, PERAFÁN + +& PÉREZ- MILES, 2014, +Fig. 8B +). Female ( +Fig. 2 +) differs from congeners by the shape of the spermathecae ( +Fig. 14 +), with two wide seminal receptacles (shorter than in + +E. grismadoi + +and + +E. tenebrarum + +) with a semi-spheroid chamber joined by a very short duct (longer duct in + +E. grismadoi + +). + + +Description. Male +holotype +(MUSA-AR 234). Total length: 26.36. Carapace ( +Fig. 6 +): length 11.10, width 10.61. Chelicerae with 6-7 teeth on promargin, with granulation near last two basal teeth; cheliceral teeth pattern from the basal end: right side: VVVVVVV, left side: VVVVVV. Anterior eye row slightly procurved, posterior eye row recurved. Eye siZes and interdistances: AME 0.26, ALE 0.28, PME 0.24, PLE 0.30, AME-AME 0.34, AME-ALE 0.17, PME-PME 0.79, PME-PLE 0.13, ALE-PLE 0.23, AME-PME 0.15, OQ length 0.74, width 1.60. Ocular tubercle oval and slightly elevated ( +Fig. 8 +), length 1.13, width 1.60, clypeus 0.22. Fovea transverse, deep, recurved ( +Fig. 6 +), width 2.40. Labium length 1.50, width 1.70, anterior third with 76 cuspules, maxillae right/left with 99/98 cuspules. Sternum ( +Fig. 7 +): length 5.48, width 4.74. Abdomen ( +Fig. 10 +): length 14.95, width 10.95. PLS three-segmented, length 5.04, basal segment 2.04, middle segment 1.56, apical segment 1.44, all digitiform. PMS (one segment), length 1.06. Abdomen with type III urticating setae located in a medial dorsal patch ( +Fig.10 +). Urticating setae patch: length 4.23, width 6.65. Leg pattern: IV>I>II>III ( +Tab. I +). Scopulae: all tarsi, 100% scopulated. Metatarsi I 70% scopulated, metatarsi II 40% scopulated, metatarsi III 25% scopulated and metatarsi IV 20% scopulated. Tarsi I-II with complete scopula, divided with a thin longitudinal row of short setae, tarsi III-IV with scopula entire. Tibial apophysis ( +Fig. 9 +) with two branches with retrolateral branch slightly longer than prolateral, both branches with a subapical internal short spine. Retrolateral branch with subapical external short spine (only at right tibial apophysis). Metatarsus I slightly curved. Flexion of metatarsus I retrolateral to the tibial apophysis. Cymbium with lobes of similar siZes. Palpal bulb ( +Figs 3-5 +) with unequal prolateral keels, PS and PI well-development, PI has serrated edge with three teeth, presence of prolateral AK. Spination: femora I p 0-0-2, r 0-0-(1-0); II p 0-(1-0)-2, r 0-0-1; III p (1-0)-0-(2-1), r 0-(0-1)-(2-1); IV p 0-1-(1-2), r 0-0-(2-1) and femora of palps p 0-0-1. Patellae I p 1-(0-2)-1; II 0; III p 0-0-(1-0); IV 0 and patellae of palps 0. Tibiae I v 3-(2-3)-1 (apical), p (0-1)-1-(1-2), r (3-2)-(0-2)-(2-1); II v (4-3)-4-3, p (1-2)-(0-1)-1, r 1-0-(1-0); III v 1-2-3 (apical), p (1-2)-(2-1)-2, r (3-2)-0-(0-1); IV v 2-2-3 (apical), p (1-0)- 1-1, r 1-1-2 and tibiae of palps v (2-1)-1-0, p 1-(3-2)-(2-1). Metatarsi I v 1-0-1 (apical), p 1-0-0; II v (3-2)-(1-0)-2 (apical); III v (3-2)-2-3 (apical), p 1-(0-1)-1, r 1-(2-1)-1; IV v 3-(3- 2)-3 (apical), p 1-1-1, r 2-(1-2)-2. Tarsi I - IV and tarsi of palps 0. Coloration (in life): carapace dark brown, widely covered with light brown setae from the anterior edge of ocular tubercle to the fovea, and light brown setae on the margins and dorsal chelicerae. Legs dark brown, with abundant long golden-brown setae. Femora with three parallel longitudinal stripes (two dorsal and one retrolateral); patellae and tibiae with two parallel longitudinal stripes; and one longitudinal stripe reaching the third part of the metatarsi I-II, and the fourth part in the metatarsi III-IV. Abdomen dark brown, with abundant coppery setae on the base, with a large patch of golden-brown urticating setae. + + + +Figs 6-10. + +Euathlus vanessae + +sp. nov. +, male holotype (MUSA-AR 234): 6, carapace, dorsal view; 7, sternum, labium, maxillae and coxae, ventral view; 8, ocular tubercle, dorsal view; 9, left tibial apophysis, ventral view; 10, abdomen, dorsal view (PB, prolateral branch; RB, retrolateral branch). Scale bar = 1 mm (Figs 8, 9), 5 mm (Figs 6, 7, 10). + + + + +Figs 11-15. + +Euathlus vanessae + +sp. nov. +, female paratype (MUSA-AR 230): 11, carapace, dorsal view; 12, sternum, labium, maxillae and coxae, ventral view; 13, ocular tubercle, dorsal view; 14, spermathecae, ventral view; 15, abdomen, dorsal view. Scale bar = 1 mm (Figs 13, 14), 5 mm (Figs 11, 12, 15). + + + +Female +paratype +(MUSA-AR 230). Total length: 33.40. Carapace ( +Fig. 11 +): length 14.70, width 13.76. Chelicerae with 7 teeth on promargin, with granulation near last two basal teeth; cheliceral teeth pattern from the basal end: right side: VVVVVVv, left side: VVVVVv. Anterior eye row procurved, posterior eye row recurved. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.33, ALE 0.44, PME 0.29, PLE 0.45, AME-AME 0.47, AME-ALE 0.32, PME-PME 1.02, PME-PLE 0.17, ALE-PLE 0.27, AME-PME 0.30, OQ length 1.16, width 2.21. Ocular tubercle oval and slightly elevated ( +Fig. 13 +), length 1.64, width 2.21, clypeus 0.45. Fovea transverse, straight ( +Fig. 11 +), width 2.65. Labium length 2.32, width 2.56, anterior third with 76 cuspules, maxillae right/left with 98/103 cuspules. Sternum ( +Fig. 12 +): length 6.88, width 6.25. Abdomen ( +Fig. 15 +): length 16.75, width 12.40. PLS three-segmented, length 6.46, basal segment 2.61, middle segment 1.88 apical segment 1.97, all digitiform. PMS (one segment), length 1.86. Abdomen with type III urticating setae located in a medial dorsal patch ( +Fig. 15 +). Urticating setae patch: length 4.64, width 6.48. Leg pattern: IV>I>II>III (Tab. II). Scopulae: all tarsi, 100% scopulated. Metatarsi I 60% scopulated, metatarsi II 50% scopulated, metatarsi III 40% scopulated and metatarsi IV 20% scopulated. Tarsi I-IV with complete scopula, divided with a thin longitudinal row of short setae. Spination: femora I p 0-0-1; II p 0-0-0-1; III p 0-0-1, r 0-0-(0-1); IV r 0-0-1 and femora of palps p 0-0-1. Patellae I - IV 0 and patellae of palps v 0-0-1 apical. Tibiae I v 1-(2-1)-3 apical); II v 1-(2-1)-3 apical, p 0-(0-1)-0; III v (1-2)-(2-1)-(2-3) apical, p 1-1-0, r (1-0)-(1-0)-(0-1); IV v 0-2-3 apical, p 0-1-0, r 1-1-2 and tibiae of palps v 1-1-3 apical, p 1-(1-2)-0, r 0-0-1. Metatarsi I v (1-0)-0-2 apical; II v 1-(1-0)-(2-3) apical; III v 2-(2-1)-3 apical, p (1-0)-1-(1-0), r 0-1-1; IV v 1-2-(2-3) apical, p 0-1-1, r (2-1)-(2-3)-1. Tarsi I - IV and tarsi of palps 0. Spermatheca: with two wide seminal receptacles, each with an oval chamber pointing laterally and two ventral projections ( +Fig. 14 +). Coloration (in alcohol): carapace reddish brown, covered with light brown setae on the margins and dorsal chelicerae. Legs reddish brown, with abundant long golden-brown setae. Femora with three parallel longitudinal stripes (two dorsal and one retrolateral); patellae and tibiae with two parallel longitudinal stripes; one longitudinal stripe reaching the third part of the metatarsi I-II, and the fourth part in the metatarsi III-IV; and one longitudinal stripe reaching the third part of tarsi of palps. Abdomen dark brown, with light coppery setae on the base, with a large patch of golden-brown urticating setae. + + + +Figs 16, 17. Different habitats where + +Euathlus vanessae + +sp. nov. +has been collected: 16, cacti and scrubs, approximately at 3500 m a.s.l.; 17, low shrubs, perennial herbaceous plants and queñua relicts ( + +Polylepis besseri +Hieron + +) approximately at 4100 m a.s.l. Photos by O. M. Quispe-Colca. + + + + +Fig. 18. Distribution map of the known species of + +Euathlus + +. + + + + +Fig. 19. Mining concessions in southern Peru, Moquegua and Tacna regions. Yellow circles represent the record of + +Euathlus vanessae + +sp. nov. + + + + +Tab. I. + +Euathlus vanessae + +sp. nov. +, male holotype (MUSA-AR 234). Lengths of palpal and leg segments. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
FemurPatellaTibiaMetatarsusTarsusTotal
Palp6.334.615.34-2.0418.32
Leg I10.326.577.848.075.5538.35
Leg II10.415.107.838.324.7636.42
Leg III8.744.476.847.684.5532.28
Leg IV10.195.188.6210.165.0539.20
+ + + +Tab. II. + +Euathlus vanessae + +sp. nov. +, female paratype (MUSA-AR 230). Lengths of palpal and leg segments. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
FemurPatellaTibiaMetatarsusTarsusTotal
Palp7.845.425.76-4.3823.4
Leg I11.557.158.937.864.2539.74
Leg II11.106.227.807.384.8137.31
Leg III10.346.287.687.854.9537.10
Leg IV11.586.548.7811.064.3742.33
+ + +Distribution. + +Euathlus vanessae + +sp. nov. +is found along the high Andean zone from Mariscal Nieto province, +Moquegua region +, +Peru +, approximately in altitudes between 3100 and +4200 m +a.s.l. ( +Fig. 18 +). + + +Natural history. The habitat of the new species is characterized by a cold and arid environment of stony soils, typical of the dry puna. The vegetation comprises mainly scrub (low shrubs, perennial herbaceous plants), cacti, as well as “queñua” relicts and forest ( + +Polylepis besseri +Hieron + +) ( +Figs 16, 17 +). The mean annual temperature is about 9-12.5°C, with the mean annual precipitation of approximately +169 mm +, being December to March the wettest months, while the relative humidity is about 40.7% ( +KNIGHT PIESOLD CONSULTING, 2008 +). The male +holotype +was found in +September 2020 +(ending winter in the southern hemisphere) under a stone without any apparent shelter. The female +paratype +was found in +January 2019 +(summer) inside a tubular burrow under a stone. + + +Conservation status. + +Euathlus vanessae + +sp. nov. +has an area of occupancy (AOO) of less than +500 km +2 +and is currently known from less than five locations, including a + +Polylepis besseri + +forest, categoriZed in +Peru +as Vulnerable ( +MINAG, 2006 +). Based on the +IUCN (2019) +categories and criteria, we suggest Endangered (EN): B1ab (iii) + 2ab (iii) as a conservation category for + +E. vanessae + +sp. nov. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/AE/B7/03AEB775FF97FFB6DDDE0B1BFA5A2084.xml b/data/03/AE/B7/03AEB775FF97FFB6DDDE0B1BFA5A2084.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cad186d24ba --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/AE/B7/03AEB775FF97FFB6DDDE0B1BFA5A2084.xml @@ -0,0 +1,189 @@ + + + +To boldly go: on invasive goblin spiders in Brazil (Araneae, Oonopidae) + + + +Author + +Brescovit, Antonio D. + + + +Author + +Bonaldo, Alexandre B. + + + +Author + +Ott, Ricardo + + + +Author + +Chavari, João L. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019033 + + +2019-09-09 + + +109 + + +1 +20 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019033 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019033 +1678-4766 +13265874 + + + + + + + +Orchestina pavesiiformis +Saaristo, 2007 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 49-52 +, +61 +) + + + + + + + +Orchestina pavesiiformis +SAARISTO, 2007:124 + + +, figs 16, 18, 20, 21 (male +holotype +from +Israel +, +Jerusalem +,deposited in HUJ 14220; male +paratype +, same locality in MZUT 3703; female +paratype +, same locality, in MZUT 3704; female +paratype +, same locality, in HUJ 15326; female +paratype +, same locality, in HUJ 14184); + +IZQUIERDO & RAMÍREZ, 2017:24 + +, figs 11, 17D-F, 19G, 20N, O, 22D, maps 1, 25. + + + + + +Diagnosis. Both sexes have lateral setae on the carapace margins, a character exclusive in relation to other native American species. Males can be distinguished from those of the American species by the dorsal V-pattern on the abdomen (see +IZQUIERDO & RAMÍREZ, 2017:24 +, fig. 11A-C) and by the shape of the embolus, sinuous and with distal extensions ( +Fig. 51 +; +IZQUIERDO & RAMÍREZ, 2017 +, figs 17D-F, 20N, O). Females have genitalia with external pockets and an anterior receptaculum widened at its base with V-shaped anterior apodemes at the tip ( +Fig. 52 +; +IZQUIERDO & RAMÍREZ, 2017:24 +, figs 19G, 22D). + + +Description. Male and female, see +IZQUIERDO & RAMÍREZ (2017: 24) +. + + +Biology. According +IZQUIERDO & RAMÍREZ (2017) +this species has been introduced into many countries and its natural origin is still unknown. In +Argentina +, it has been collected in disturbed environments and in houses or other human buildings. Specimens were observed walking on walls, furniture and collected in leaf litter. In +Brazil +, it has been collected in the interior of houses as well as in the interior of disturbed caves. + + +Distribution. According to +IZQUIERDO & RAMÍREZ (2017) +, this species occurs in +Israel +, +United States +, +Portugal +, +Brazil +, and +Argentina +( +Fig. 61 +). + + + +Material examined. In addition to the Brazilian material recorded to the states of +São Paulo and Minas Gerais +by +IZQUIERDO & RAMÍREZ (2017) +, only +one specimen + + +is reported here, from state of + +São Paulo +, São Paulo + +, campus of Instituto Butantan, building of LECZ, collected manually on the table, +♀ +, + +26.VII.2017 + +, +A. D. Brescovit +leg. ( +IBSP 221179 +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/AE/B7/03AEB775FF97FFB6DEA20B9AFBC427B5.xml b/data/03/AE/B7/03AEB775FF97FFB6DEA20B9AFBC427B5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..94fc7d2eabf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/AE/B7/03AEB775FF97FFB6DEA20B9AFBC427B5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,379 @@ + + + +To boldly go: on invasive goblin spiders in Brazil (Araneae, Oonopidae) + + + +Author + +Brescovit, Antonio D. + + + +Author + +Bonaldo, Alexandre B. + + + +Author + +Ott, Ricardo + + + +Author + +Chavari, João L. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019033 + + +2019-09-09 + + +109 + + +1 +20 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019033 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019033 +1678-4766 +13265874 + + + + + + + +Heteroonops spinimanus +( +Simon, 1891 +) + + + + + + + +( +Figs 46-48 +, +59 +) + + + + + + + +Oonops spinimanus + +SIMON, 1891:563 + + + +, pl. 42, fig. 6 (Female +syntype +from +Saint Vincent Island +, Antilles, in BMNH and +five female +syntypes +from +Caracas +, +Distrito Federal +, +Venezuela +). + + + + + + +Oonops bermudensis +BANKS, 1902:269 + + +, fig. 1a-c (Female +holotype +from the +Bermuda +Islands, no specific locality, in Peabody Museum, Yale); + +SIERWALD, 1988:10 + +(Syn.). + + + + + +Heteroonops spinimanus + +: + +DALMAS, 1916:203 + +; + +PLATNICK & DUPÉRRE, 2009b:22 + +, figs 79-139. + + + + + + +Oonopinus hunus +SUMAN, 1965:238 + + +, figs 35-37 (Female +holotype +from SE slope of Ulumawao Peak, Kailua, Oahu, +Hawaii +, in Bishop Museum, Honolulu); + +PLATNICK & DUPÉRRE, 2009b:22 + +(Syn.). + + + + + + +Matyotia tetraspinosus +SAARISTO, 2001:351 + + +, figs 165-169 (Male +holotype +from Anse Cimitière, Silhouette, +Seychelles +Islands, in Zoological Museum at University of Turku, Turku); + +PLATNICK & DUPÉRRE, 2009b:22 + +(Syn.). + + + + + +Diagnosis. Specimens of + +Heteroonops spinimanus + +can be easily separated from all other Brazilian synanthropic species by the enlarged posterior projection on the male endites (see +PLATNICK & DUPÉRRE, 2009b:22 +, figs 84-86), angular embolus and conductor (see +PLATNICK & DUPÉRRE, 2009b:22 +, figs 87, 88) and the umbrella-shaped anterior receptaculum in the female genitalia ( +Fig. 47 +). + + +Description. Male and female, see +PLATNICK & DUPÉRRE (2009b:22 +, figs 79-139). + + +Biology. + +Heteroonops spinimanus + +has been considered to be parthenogenetic by some authors ( +SAARISTO, 2001 +), resembling, in that regard, + +T +. +stenaspis + +. Even though it was originally described from +St. Vincent +, it’s currently known to have a Pantropical distribution. Although many populations of + +H +. +spinimanus + +may be parthenogenetic, apparently conspecific males have been collected together with females twice, in +Seychelles +Islands and in Florida ( +PLATNICK & DUPÉRRÉ, 2009b +). All known specimens from +Brazil +are females, but the low number of samples prevents any claim on a parthenogenetic condition in Brazilian populations. + + +Distribution. According to +PLATNICK & DUPÉRRÉ (2009b) +, this species has a Pantropical distribution, but only two records in the South American countries were provided so far, from +Colombia +and +Venezuela +. Here the first Brazilian records of + +H +. +spinimanus + +are presented, from states of Bahia, São Paulo and Rio Grande do Sul ( +Fig. 59 +). + + + +Material +examined. +BRAZIL +. + +Bahia + +: +Itamaraju +( +16°59’26”S +- +39°25’55”W +, +♀ +, + +14.IV.2011 + +, +C. M. P. Leite +leg. ( +IBSP 166615 +) + +; + +Jaguaripe +( +13°10’39”S +- +38°59’51”W +), +6♀ +, + +02.III.2011 + +, +C. M. P. Leite +leg. ( +IBSP 166616-166618 +) + +; + + +São Paulo + +: SÃo +Paulo +, +Vila +ButantÃ, +2♀ +, + +18.I.2000 + +, +F. S. Cunha +leg. ( +IBSP 30397 +; +IBSP 32967 +) + +; + +Ubatuba +, +Parque Estadual da Ilha Anchieta +( +23°32’S +- +45º03’W +), +♀ +, + +23-30. VII.2001 + +, +Equipe Biota +( +IBSP 69884 +) + +; + + +Rio Grande do Sul + +: +Porto Alegre +, +Jardim Botânico +, +♀ +, + +02.I.2013 + +( +MCN 49944 +) + +; + +2♀ +, + +3.V.2013 + +( +MCN 49945 +) + +; +2♀ +, +5.VII.2013 +, all collected by G. O. Silva +et al. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/AE/B7/03AEB775FF98FFBFDDED0D8CFC352053.xml b/data/03/AE/B7/03AEB775FF98FFBFDDED0D8CFC352053.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3c95810f62e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/AE/B7/03AEB775FF98FFBFDDED0D8CFC352053.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1037 @@ + + + +To boldly go: on invasive goblin spiders in Brazil (Araneae, Oonopidae) + + + +Author + +Brescovit, Antonio D. + + + +Author + +Bonaldo, Alexandre B. + + + +Author + +Ott, Ricardo + + + +Author + +Chavari, João L. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019033 + + +2019-09-09 + + +109 + + +1 +20 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019033 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019033 +1678-4766 +13265874 + + + + + + + +Triaeris stenaspis +Simon, 1891 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 13, 14 +, +60 +) + + + + + + + +Triaeris stenaspis +SIMON, 1891:561 + + +. +Syntype +female from +Saint Vincent +in MNHN and females +syntypes +from same locality in the BMNH; + + +PLATNICK +et al. +, 2012a:22 + + +, figs 1-40. + + + + + + +Triaeris patellaris +BRYANT,1940:268 + + +, fig.4. Female +holotype +from Soledad, +Cienfuegos +, +Cuba +, in MCZ; examined; + +CHICKERING, 1968b:358 + +, figs 14-18 (Syn.). + + + + + + +Triaeris berlandi +LAWRENCE, 1952:5 + + +, figs 3a-f. Female +holotype +from Thysville [= Mbanza-Ngungu], +DR Congo +, in Musée Royal de l’Afrique Centrale, Tervuren; + + +PLATNICK +et al. +, 2012a:23 + + +(Syn.) + + + + + + +Triaeris lepus +SUMAN, 1965:235 + + +, figs 27-31. Female +holotype +from Puu Papaa Peak, Kaneohe, Oahu, +Hawaii +, in Bishop Museum; + + +PLATNICK +et al. +, 2012a:23 + + +(Syn.). + + + + + + +Triaeris lacandona +BRIGNOLI,1974a:208 + + +, figs 4A-F. Female +holotype +from Cueva de Yaxchilan, +Peten +, +Guatemala +, depository unknown; + +BRIGNOLI, 1975a:34 + +, figs 1H-J; + + +PLATNICK +et al. +, 2012a:23 + + +(Syn.). + + + + + +Diagnosis. + +Triaeris stenaspis + +is known only by females, easily recognized by their orange color, genitalia occupying the greater part of the postepigastric scutum, with a median longitudinal slit and internally with sinuous and distally squiggled duct, visible by transparence ( +Fig. 14 +). + + +Description. Female, see + +PLATNICK +et al. +, 2012a:22 + +, figs 1-40 + + +Biology. The taxonomic status of the pantropical goblin spider + +Triaeris stenaspis + +was defined by + +PLATNICK +et al. +(2012a) + +. Presently, this species is well established in many parts of the world ( +KOPONEN, 1997 +; +KIELHORN, 2008 +; + +KORENKO +et al. +, 2009 + +; + +PLATNICK +et al. +, 2012a + +) and apparently sustained populations are present in various continents. + +KORENKO +et al. +(2009) + +showed that at least one population from +Czech Republic +is parthenogenetic. Since no males were found with sampled females so far, including the 200 records here reported, parthenogenesis might actually be true for all known populations of this species. + +Triaeris stenaspis + +occur from north to south +Brazil +, being very common in the ground at urban parks. The invasion of this species in Brazilian territory might occurred long ago, giving its wide distribution in the country and the fact that it is not strictly peri-domiciliar, collected as well in forest litter and even in natural caves, but the first known record of this species in +Brazil +dates as recently as 1996. The large number of records reported here from natural caves in the states of +Tocantins +, +Goiás +and +Minas Gerais +might be cause for conservation concerns. Since this species appears to be a dominating faunistic component in those cavities, it may represent danger for autochthones species in these sensible environments. + + +Distribution. This Pantropical species have a wide distribution range in +Brazil +, occurring mainly in urban areas ( +Fig. 60 +). + +PLATNICK +et al. +(2012a) + +hypothesized that + +Triaeris + +belongs to a West African sub-group of the + +Zyngoonops + +group of genera, a large putatively monophyletic lineage with representatives in both the Neotropics and Africa. Under this assumption, + +Triaeris stenaspis + +would be an African species in origin, which attained a Pantropical distribution. + + +Material examined. +BRAZIL +, + +Acre + +: Senador Guiomard, Reserva Extrativista Catuaba ( +10°12’51.4584”S +- +67°45’17.1216”W +), +5♀ +, 2002, E. Morato +et al. +leg. (IBSP 86836, 86850, 86873, 86879, 86920); + +Pará + +: Uruará ( +03°43’4”S +- +53°44’13”W +), +2♀ +, 2014, R. L. Cajaiba leg. (IBSP 166581); + +Tocantins + +: Dianópolis, Gruta Vozinha ( +11°27’36”S +– +46°51’00”W +), +3♀ +, +04-09.XII.2007 +, R. Andrade +et al. +leg. (IBSP 97622); Gruta Areia ( +11°27’36”S +– +46°51’00”W +), +4♀ +, +04-09.XII.2007 +, R. Andrade +et al. +leg. (IBSP 97640); Gruta 3 Morros III ( +11°27’36”S +46°51’00”W +), +♀ +, +21-29.V.2008 +, F. Pellegatti Franco +et al. +leg. (IBSP 134439); + +Goiás + +: São Domingos, Lapa de São Bernardo II ( +16°34’31.26”S +- +49°10’32.307”W +), +5♀ +, +18.IX.1997 +, P. Gnaspini +et al. +leg. (IBSP 23729, 23730); Lapa de Terra Ronca II ( +16°34’31.26”S +- +49°10’32.307”W +), +2♀ +, +20. IX.1997 +, P. Gnaspini +et al. +leg. (IBSP 23741, 23743); +3♀ +4 imm. +, +19.IX.1997 +, P. Gnaspini +et al. +leg. (IBSP 23746); Parque Estadual de Terra Ronca, Caverna Angélica ( +16°34’31.26”S +- +49°10’32.307”W +), +9♀ +, 6 imm, +06-09. IX.2000 +, F. P. Franco leg. (IBSP 26050, 26053, 26054, 26070, 26072); Parque Estadual de Terra Ronca, Caverna Passa Três ( +16°34’31.26”S +- +49°10’32.307”W +), +7♀ +, +5 imm. +, +03-05.IX.2000 +, C. A. Rheims & F. P. Franco leg. (IBSP 26064, 26077, 26079, 26080); Morrinhos, Parque Ecológico Jatobá Centenário ( +17°43’36”S +– +49°07’55”W +), +2♀ +, +XII.2006 +- +VIII.2007 +, R. C. Santana leg. (IBSP 140921); + +Mato Grosso + +, Primavera do Leste, Gruta KNL-1- S1EMAL004 (181326E - 8383239mN), +♀ +, +12-20.VIII.2014 +, Equipe Spelayon leg. (IBSP 166573); + +Mato Grosso do Sul + +: Campo Grande, Reserva UCDB ( +20°24’50.0256”S +- +54°36’55.854”W +); +2♀ +, +07.IV.1997 +, K. O. Vieira leg. (IBSP 38355); Inocência, Fazenda Lagoinha ( +19°17’03”S +– +51°03’06”W +), +♀ +, +18.XI.2004 +, J. Raizer leg. (IBSP 68030); Anastácio, Fazenda Jatiuca ( +20°31’54”S +– 55°50’27”), +♀ +, +16-26.II.2008 +, R. Bessi leg. (IBSP 127638); Ivinhema ( +22°31’19.1856”S +- +53°50’49.1676”W +), +34♀ +, +X.2004 +- +XII.2006 +, K. Anjos leg. (IBSP 92829, 92833, 92839‒92866); + +Bahia + +: Jaguaripe ( +13°10’01”S +- +39°00’04”W +), +♀ +, +02. III.2011 +, C. M. P. Leite leg. (IBSP 166609); Wenceslau GuimarÃes ( +13°34’32”S +- +39°42’25”W +), +♀ +, +21.I.2011 +, C. M. P. Leite leg. (IBSP 166610); Salvador, Baia do Aratu ( +12°47’32.8”S +– +38°28’15.3”W +), +5♀ +, 2008-2009, K. Benati (IBSP 126081, 126090, 126101, 126103, 126109); Ponte do Fernandinho ( +12°47’32.8”S +– +38°28’15.3”W +), +9♀ +, +13.IX.2004 +, K. Benati leg. (IBSP 58840‒58841, 58860, 58893; 58897, 58902, 58918, 58939, 59023); Itapetinga, Parque Municipal da Matinha ( +15°15’43.8618”S +- +40°17’44.9376”W +), +♀ +, III-IV.2003, J. P. S. Alves leg. (IBSP 66524); Una, Reserva Ecológica de Una ( +15°17’48”S +- +39°04’28”W +), +4♀ +, +X.1999 +- +IX.2000 +, M. F. Dias leg. (IBSP 64221, 65268, 65350); + +Minas Gerais + +: Prudente de Morais, Fazenda Sapé ( +19°28’8.2344”S +- +44°5’31.7328”W +), +2♀ +, +13.X.2001 +, É. S. S. Álvares leg. (IBSP 44224, 44232); Uberlândia, Estação Ecológica do Panga ( +19º11’10”S +- +49º23’30”W +), +3♀ +, +IV.2005 +- +II.2006 +, M. F. Mineo leg. (IBSP 92663-92665); Belo Horizonte, Estação Ecológica da UFMG ( +19°52’S +- +43°58’W +), +8♀ +, +I.2001 +, É. S. S. Álvares leg. (IBSP 66796, 66798, 66800); Estação Ecológica da UFMG, Mata do Sossego ( +19°52’S +- +43°58’W +), +♀ +, +II.2001 +, É. S. S. Álvares, E. O. Machado & C. S. Azevedo leg. (IBSP 68573); Belo Horizonte, COPASA ( +20°10’S +- +44°21’W +), +♀ +, +IV.2002 +, Equipe Biota (IBSP 136439); Jaboticatubas, Serra do Cipó, Parque Nacional da Serra do Cipó ( +19°15’S +- +43°31’W +), +40♀ +, 2002-2003, Equipe Biota leg. (IBSP 68258-68294); Mariana, Gruta FN-12 ( +20°10’18.3684”S +- +43°25’13.029”W +), +2♀ +, +16-21.I.2009 +, R. Andrade +et al. +leg. (IBSP 146210, 146216); Mina Alegria ( +20°10’18.3684”S +- +43°25’13.029”W +), +2♀ +, +16-17.IV.2009 +, R. Bessi +et al. +leg. (IBSP 149764); Prados, Gruta S3_HOL_010 (596862E - 7657188N), +♀ +, +29.VII.2014 +, L. T. Fonseca leg. (IBSP 166568); Córrego Fundo: Gruta MC_SM_ 015 ( +20°26’32”S +; +45°35’57”W +), +♀ +, +19-21.V.2014 +, Santos +et al. +leg. (IBSP 166569); Gruta MC_SM_016 ( +20°26’33”S +; +45°35’56”W +), +♀ +, +08-20.I.2014 +, Equipe Spelayon leg. (IBSP 166570); Pains ( +20°22’15”S +; +45°39’39”W +): +♀ +, +31.VII.2014 +, F. Bondezan leg. (IBSP 166571); Gruta Loca dos Negros ( +20°26’06”S +; +45°39’33”W +), +♀ +, +20.III.2009 +, R. Zampaulo leg. (IBSP 166584); Gruta Tamafi ( +20°23’39”S +; +45°40’48”W +), +♀ +, +09.III.2009 +, R. Zampaulo leg. (IBSP 166585); Gruta SPA_015 ( +20°17’53”S +; +45°25’38”W +), +♀ +, +24.I.2014 +, M. Barcelos leg. (IBSP 166587); Cave SPA_030 ( +20°18’24”S +; +45°35’48”W +), +♀ +, +05.II.2014 +, N. T. Pimentel & T. F. Ferreira leg. (IBSP 166588); Cave SPA_037 ( +20°18’26”S +; +45°35’45”W +), +♀ +, +05.II.2014 +, F. O. Borges & M. Barcelos leg. (IBSP 166589); Cave SM-68 ( +20°20’47”S +; +45°36’09”W +), +2♀ +, +12.III.2012 +, Equipe Spelayon leg. (IBSP 166590); Cave SM-180 ( +20°22’21”S +; +45°35’34”W +), +♀ +, +13.II.2014 +, Equipe Spelayon leg. (IBSP 166591); Cave SM-287 ( +20°21’46”S +; +45°35’51”W +), +♀ +, +20.II.2014 +, Equipe Spelayon leg. (IBSP 166592), Cave SM-103 ( +20°21’40”S +; +45°36’12”W +), +♀ +, +18.VIII.2012 +, Equipe Spelayon leg. (IBSP 166596); Cave SM-246 ( +20°21’51”S +; +45°35’46”W +), +♀ +, +20.II.2014 +, Equipe Spelayon leg. (IBSP 166597); Cave SM-42 ( +20°21’50”S +; +45°35’58”W +), +2♀ +, +21.III.2012 +, Equipe Spelayon leg. (IBSP 166593); Cave SM-258 ( +20°21’52”S +; +45°35’43”W +), +2♀ +, +19.IX.2013 +, Equipe Spelayon leg. (IBSP 166602); Cave SM-153 ( +20°22’03”S +; +45°35’38”W +), +♀ +(IBSP 166594); Cave SM-236 ( +20°22’11”S +; +45°35’51”W +), +♀ +(IBSP 166595); Cave SM-178 ( +20°22’20”S +; +45°35’23”W +), +♀ +(IBSP 166598); Cave SM-205 ( +20°22’23”S +; +45°35’40”W +), +♀ +(IBSP 166599); Cave SM-157 ( +20°21’53”S +; +45°35’39”W +), +♀ +(IBSP 166600); Cave SM-195 ( +20°22’23”S +; +45°35’37”W +), +♀ +(IBSP 166601), all collected in +13.II.2014 +by Equipe Spelayon; Matozinhos, Cave 100, +4♀ +, +VI.2014 +, F. Bondezan leg. (IBSP 166575 - IBSP 166578); Cordisburgo, Gruta da Morena ( +19°8’25.584”S +- +44°21’20.5272”W +), +♀ +, +12.IX.2001 +, P. Gnaspini leg. (IBSP 71833); Lavras ( +21°13’43.9638”S +- +44°58’1.6608”W +), +17♀ +, +16-19.VI.2000 +, M. Andreizza leg. (IBSP 86329-86330, 86337-86339, 86342, 86346-86347, 86349-86350, 86352- 86355, 86357, 86359, 86361); +♀ +, 2000, A. Almeida leg. (IBSP 121445); + +Rio de Janeiro + +: Rio de Janeiro, Bairro Laranjeiras, Parque Guinle ( +22°55’50.38”S +- +43°11’1.12”W +), +2♀ +, +20.X.2001 +, R. Baptista leg. (MNRJ 3759); Volta Redonda, Floresta da Cicuta ( +22°33’2.016”S +- +44°5’31.7328”W +), +♀ +, +11.III.2002 +, E. Folly leg. (IBSP 39605); +4♀ +, +04-11.III.2002 +- +11-18.VI.2001 +, Equipe Biota (IBSP 136199-136202); Pinheiral, Fazenda Santa Helena, Fazenda Regional de Criação (Posto Zootécnico) ( +22°34’S +- +44°21’W +), +♀ +, 05.11. +XI/1999 +, A. D. Brescovit leg. (IBSP 66897); + +São Paulo + +: Jacareí, Campus Vila Branca, Univap ( +23°12’28.7886”S +- +45°56’52.746”W +), +♀ +, 2007, N. M. C. Velho leg. (IBSP 143942); Cotia, Caucaia do Alto, Reserva do Morro Grande ( +23°40’52.4742”S +- +46°59’25.4472”W +), +2♀ +, +III.2003 +, Equipe Biota leg. (IBSP 136732, 136733); São Paulo, Campus USP, Mata do Cuaso ( +23°33’54.9432”S +- +46°43’43.9608” W +), +16♀ +, +14-21.IX.1999 +, D. Candiani leg. (IBSP 69027-69032, 69034, 69036-69040); +10♀ +, +16-23. II.2000 +, D. F. Candiani leg. (IBSP 42154, 42156, 68768- 68769); Parque da Previdência ( +23°34’47.9886”S +- +46°43’38.8236”W +), +19♀ +, +16-23.VIII.1999 +, D. F. Candiani leg. (IBSP 42159, 42162, 68785, 68787, 68797, 68806); +146♀ +, +14-21/IX/1999 +- +19/XII/1999 +, D. Candiani leg. (IBSP 69041-69047, 69049-69082, 69084-69103); +♀ +, +V.2000 +- +II.2001 +, D. F. Candiani (IBSP 76545); +7♀ +, 2000-2001, D. F. Candiani +et al. +leg. (IBSP 117046); +5♀ +, 1999, D. Candiani leg. (IBSP 69083, PBI_OON 10912); Parque dos Príncipes ( +23°34’24.0162”S +- +46°46’17.5944”W +); +♀ +, +05-12.X.2004 +, P.A. M. Goldoni & S. Guizze leg. (IBSP 48525); Reservatório Guarapiranga, Jardim Ângela, Ilha dos Eucaliptos ( +23°45’9.5286”S +- +46°44’23.3082”W +), +17♀ +, +07-13.X.2003 +, I. Cizauskas & C. R. M. Garcia leg. (IBSP 61400-61413); Parque EcolÓgico Guarapiranga, +2♀ +, 2009, I. Cizauskas leg. (IBSP 155047-155048); Parque do Estado ( +23°39’8.625”S +- +46°36’57.9924”W +), +♀ +, +21-28.I.2003 +, J. Valvassori leg. (IBSP 68057); Itapevi, Condomínio TransUrb ( +23°35’28.284”S +- +46°58’29.121”W +), +♀ +, +30.IV.1999 +, V. C. Onofrio leg. (IBSP 67591); Louveira ( +23°05’11”S +– +46°57’02”W +), +2♀ +, +16.I.1996 +, A. E. C. Farinha leg. (IBSP 12067); Pindamonhangaba ( +22°55’26”S +– +45°27’42”W +), +♀ +, +08-10.IV.1998 +, R. Martins & I. Knysak leg. (IBSP 20066); Peruíbe, Estação Ecológica Juréia-Itatins ( +24°33’015”S +– 7°13’292”W), +2♀ +, +26.IX-03.V.1999 +, A. D. Brescovit +et al. +leg. (IBSP 25696, 25791); Iporanga, Parque Estadual TurísticoAlto do Ribeira, ( +24°30’1.3968”S +- +48°35’8.415”W +), +♀ +, R. Andrade leg. (IBSP 29414); Dois CÓrregos, SÍtio Guedes ( +22°19’5.3436”S +- +48°21’45.6912”W +), +♀ +, +01-06. IV.2002 +, G. Q. Romero leg. (IBSP 34974); Teodoro Sampaio, Parque Estadual do Morro do Diabo ( +22°31’S +- +52°18’W +), +♀ +, +24-31.III.2003 +, Equipe Biota leg. (IBSP 60189); ApiaÍ, Parque Estadual Turístico Alto do Ribeira, Núcleo Santana ( +24°27’36”S +- +48°36’0”W +), +4♀ +, +08-14.XII.2002 +, Equipe Biota leg. (IBSP 136440, 136515-136517); Jaboticabal ( +21°14’54.6288”S +- +48°16’9.7278”W +), +8♀ +, +III‒IV.2004 +(IBSP 55862, 55909); Ubatuba, Parque Estadual da Ilha Anchieta ( +23°32’S +– +45°03’W +), +2♀ +, +23-30.VII.2001 +, Equipe Biota leg. (IBSP 56408, 56413); + +Paraná + +: Foz do Iguaçu, Parque Nacional de Foz do Iguaçu ( +25°36’S +- +54°25’W +), +8♀ +, +03-12. III.2002 +, Equipe Biota leg. (IBSP 60249, 60256, 136460- 136465); Londrina, Parque Estadual Mata dos Godoy ( +23°27’1.0656”S +- +51°14’11.0646”W +), +6♀ +, +13.IV.1999 +- +07. II.2000 +, J. Lopes leg. (IBSP 38208, 38240, 38258, 38266, 38269); Cornélio Procópio, Parque Estadual Mata São Francisco ( +23°9’30.2826”S +- +50°33’52.416”W +), +3♀ +, +08.V.2009 +, N. G. Cípola leg. (IBSP 150237, 150289, 150294); + +Santa Catarina + +: Brusque ( +27°05’53”S +- +48°55’03”W +), Bairro Bateias, campus Empresa Buettner, +10♀ +, 2014, D. L. Ronchi leg. (IBSP 166603-166608); Blumenau, Parque Natural Municipal Nascentes do Rio Garcia ( +26°55’10.7862”S +- +49°05’36.5748”W +), +♀ +, +23.I.2005 +, R. C. Francisco leg. (IBSP 68394); Palhoça ( +27°38’42”S +- +48°40’04”W +), Serra do Tabuleiro, +♀ +, +I.2003 +, Equipe Biota leg. (IBSP 136435); Paulo Lopes, Parque Estadual da Serra do Tabuleiro ( +27°55’S +- +48°42’W +), +♀ +, +10-20.I.2003 +, Equipe Biota leg. (IBSP 60491); Santo Amaro da Imperatriz ( +27°41’0.9018”S +- +48°43’50.9442”W +), +♀ +, 2004, J. Steiner leg. (IBSP 91114). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/AE/B7/03AEB775FF9AFFB9DDD00E3EFB502207.xml b/data/03/AE/B7/03AEB775FF9AFFB9DDD00E3EFB502207.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bd618942ae2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/AE/B7/03AEB775FF9AFFB9DDD00E3EFB502207.xml @@ -0,0 +1,929 @@ + + + +To boldly go: on invasive goblin spiders in Brazil (Araneae, Oonopidae) + + + +Author + +Brescovit, Antonio D. + + + +Author + +Bonaldo, Alexandre B. + + + +Author + +Ott, Ricardo + + + +Author + +Chavari, João L. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019033 + + +2019-09-09 + + +109 + + +1 +20 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019033 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019033 +1678-4766 +13265874 + + + + + + + +Brignolia parumpunctata +(Simon, 1893) + + + + + + + +( +Figs 7-12 +, +58 +) + + + + + + + +Xestaspis parumpunctata + +SIMON, 1893a:305 + + + +. Female +holotype +from +Sierra Leone +, no specific locality, in MNHN. + + + + +Figs 1-12. Figs 1-6, + +Brignolia dasysterna +Platnick, Dupérré, Ott & Kranz-Baltensperger, 2011 + +, male: 1, dorsal; 3, modified hairs in the sternum; 5, palp, retrolateral; 6, palp, prolateral. Female: 2, dorsal; 4, genitalia, ventral. Figs 7-12, + +Brignolia parumpunctata +(Simon, 1893) + +, male: 7, dorsal; 9, projection of clypeus; 11, palp prolateral; 12, palp retrolateral. Female: 8, dorsal; 10, genitalia, ventral. + + + + + + +Gamasomorpha perplexa +BRYANT,1942:325 + + +, figs 11-12, 18. Male +holotype +from +Saint Croix +, +Virgin Islands +, in MCZ; + + +PLATNICK +et al. +, 2011:15 + + +(Syn.). + + + + + + +Opopaea recondita +CHICKERING, 1951:231 + + +, figs 18-19. Female +holotype +from Canal Zone Biological Area [= Barro Colorado Island], +Panama +, +Panama +, in MCZ; + + +PLATNICK +et al. +, 2011:15 + + +(Syn.). + + + + + + +Brignolia cubana +DUMITRESCU & GEORGESCU, 1983:107 + + +, pl. 22, figs 1-8. Male +holotype +from Estacíon Ecológica Siboney, +Santiago de Cuba +, +Cuba +, in Institut de Spéologie, Bucharest; + + +PLATNICK +et al. +, 2011:15 + + +(Syn.). + + + + + +Brignolia recondita + +: + +PLATNICK & DUPÉRRÉ, 2009a:4 + +. + + + + + +Brignolia parumpunctata + +: + + +PLATNICK +et al. +, 2011:14 + + +. + + + + + +Diagnosis. + +Brignolia parumpunctata + +can be easily separated from + +B +. +dasysterna + +by the males having a ventrally directed protrusion situated medially on the clypeus ( +Fig. 9 +; + +PLATNICK +et al. +, 2011 + +: fig. 21) and by the distinctive curled dorsal protrusion on the palpal bulb ( +Figs 11, 12 +; + +PLATNICK +et al. +, 2011 + +: figs 31-32). Females can be easily recognized by the rounded, elevated protrusion situated between the epigastric furrow and by the groove connecting the posterior spiracles ( +Fig. 10 +). + + +Description. Male and female, see + +PLATNICK +et al. +, 2011:14 + +, figs 1-94. + + +Distribution. This species has a Pantropical distribution, occurring in the Americas, Africa, Southern Asia, Pacific Islands and +Australia +. + +PLATNICK +et al. +, 2011:31 + +, reported only one previously Brazilian record, in the state of +Pará +, norther +Brazil +. Here it is recorded in areas of north, northeast and southeast +Brazil +( +Fig. 58 +). According to + +PLATNICK +et al. +(2011) + +, this species may have an Asian origin, where the bulk of the genus diversity is from. + + + +Material +examined. +BRAZIL +. + +Rondônia + +: +Porto Velho +, +Campo Experimental +da EMBRAPA ( +08°48’9.7878”S +- +63°49’48.1188”W +), +♂ +, 2008, +L. S. P. Trigueiro +& +C. A. D. Teixeira +et al. +leg. ( +IBSP 121507 +) + +; + + +Pará + +: +Belém +, + +Campus + +IPEA, +2♂ +, +♀ +, + +02.V.1974 + +, +R. Schuh +leg. ( +AMNH +, +PBI +_ +OON 485–487 +) + +; + + +Pernambuco + +: +São Lourenço da Mata +, +Estação Ecológica de Tapacurá +( +08°0’39.8088”S +- +35°5’2.8422”W +), +2♂ +, 2008, +C. Valença +leg. ( +IBSP 97891 +, +97892 +) + +; + + +Minas Gerais + +: +Belo Horizonte +, +Campus +UFMG, +Estação Ecológica +da UFMG ( +19°52’S +– +43°58’W +), +3♂ +, + +29.III.2000 + +, +É. S. S. Álvares +& +C. S. Azevedo +leg. ( +IBSP 27202 +) + +; + +2♂ +, +10♀ +, + +IX.1999 + +- + +II.2001 + +, +É. S. S. Álvares +, +E. O. Machado +& +C. S. Azevedo +leg. ( +IBSP 32350 +) + +; + +4♂ +, + +XII.2000 + +- + +I.2001 + +, +É. S. S. Álvares +leg. ( +IBSP 66797 +) + +; + +5♂ +, + +I.2001 + +, +É. S. S. Álvares +leg. ( +IBSP 66801 +) + +; + +2♂ +, + +II.2001 + +( +IBSP 67303 +) + +; + +Jaboticatubas +, +Serra do Cipó +, +Parque Nacional da Serra +do CipÓ ( +19°15’S +- +43°31’W +), +31♂ +, +21♀ +, + +07-14.X.2002 + +‒ + +26. VI.2003 + +, +Equipe Biota +leg. ( +IBSP 69443 +, +69445–69476 +) + +; + +Marliéria +, +Parque Estadual do Rio Doce +(19°48’/ +19°29’S +– 42°38’/ +42°28’W +), +18♂ +, +20♀ +, + +01-10.IX.2003 + +, +Equipe Biota +leg. ( +IBSP 144583–144597 +) + +; + + +Bahia + +: +Salvador +, +Baía +de +Aratu +, +Ponte do Fernandinho +( +12°47’32.8”S +– +38°28’15.3”W +), +18♂ +, +♀ +, + +13.IX.2004 + +, +K. Benati +leg. ( +IBSP 58842 +, +58843 +, +58852 +, +58863 +, +58869 +, +58874 +, +58875 +, +58877 +, +58883 +, +58884 +, +58901 +, +58906 +, +58907 +, +58915 +, +58917 +, +58922 +, +58938 +, +58970 +, +58976 +, +59013 +, +59019 +) + +; + +Parque da Cidade Joventino Silva +( +12°59’57.6522”S +- +38°28’11.1606”W +), +♂ +, + +22.VIII-03. IX.2008 + +, +C. Queiroz +& +D. Mendes +leg. ( +IBSP 125569 +) + +; + +BaÍa +de +Aratu +( +12°47’32.8”S +– +38°28’15.3”W +), +42♂ +8♀ +, 2007- 2008, +K. Benati +leg. ( +IBSP 125210 +, +125260 +, +125289 +, +126033 +, +126035–126039 +, +126044 +, +126047 +, +126051–126056 +, +126058 +, +126060 +, +126064–126065 +, +126067–126068 +, +126074 +, +126077– 126078 +, +126080 +, +126083–126085 +, +126087 +, +126091–126092 +, +126094 +, +126097 +, +126100 +, +126104 +, +126106 +, +126111–126112 +, +126114 +, +126116 +, +126118–126125 +, +126128 +, +126130 +, +126134 +) + +; + +Ilhéus +, CEPLAC ( +14°47’45.5712”S +- +39°11’25.2024”W +, +5♂ +, +2♀ +, + +11.IV.1998 + +, A. D. +Brescovit +et al. +leg. ( +IBSP 19206 +, +19211 +, +19220 +, +19290 +, +19302 +) + +; + +2♂ +, +14♀ +, + +24.VII.1998 + +( +IBSP 36122 +) + +; + +2♂ +, + +18.IV.2007 + +- + +06.IX.2007 + +, +P. P. Santos +leg. ( +IBSP 98012 +, +98042 +) + +; + +Una +, +Reserva Ecológica do Una +( +15°17’48”S +- +39°04’28”W +), +♂ +, + +X.1999 + +- + +IX.2000 + +, +M. F. Dias +leg. ( +IBSP 64428 +) + +; + +Itapetinga +, +Parque Municipal da Matinha +( +15°15’43.8618”S +- +40°17’44.9376”W +), +♂ +, III-IV.2003, +J. P. S. Alves +leg. ( +IBSP 66457 +) + +; + + +Rio de Janeiro + +: +Volta Redonda +, +Mata da Cicuta +( +22°33’2.016”S +- +44°5’31.7328”W +), +♀ +, + +11- 18.VI.2003 + +, +F. S. Cunha +leg. ( +IBSP 44865 +) + +; + +5♂ +, +2♀ +, + +04-11. III.2002 + +- + +11-18.VI.2001 + +, +Equipe Biota +leg. ( +IBSP 136203- 136208 +) + +; + +♂ +, + +11.III.2002 + +, +E. F. Ramos +leg. ( +IBSP 144105 +) + +; + +ParaÍba +do +Sul +, +Fazenda Maravilha +, +♂ +, + +17-21.VIII.2001 + +, +Equipe Biota +leg. ( +IBSP 136639 +) + +; + +Resende +, +Mata das Indústrias Nucleares +( +22°31’2.2326”S +- +44°39’10.7748”W +), +♂ +, VII-IX.2007, +E. F. Ramos +leg. ( +IBSP 97542 +) + +; + + +São Paulo + +: +São Paulo +, +Campus +USP, +Mata do Cuaso +( +23°33’54.9432”S +- +46°43’43.9608”W +), +♂ +, + +16-23.XI.1999 + +, +D. F. Candiani +leg. ( +IBSP 42190 +) + +; + +Campus Instituto Butantan +, +Mata do Butantan +( +23°33’59.493”S +- +46°43’14.7612”W +), +♂ +, + +12-19.XII.1999 + +, +D. F. Candiani +leg. ( +IBSP 68979 +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/AE/B7/03AEB775FF9AFFBBDDD308DDFB7A2148.xml b/data/03/AE/B7/03AEB775FF9AFFBBDDD308DDFB7A2148.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b483c937faf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/AE/B7/03AEB775FF9AFFBBDDD308DDFB7A2148.xml @@ -0,0 +1,377 @@ + + + +To boldly go: on invasive goblin spiders in Brazil (Araneae, Oonopidae) + + + +Author + +Brescovit, Antonio D. + + + +Author + +Bonaldo, Alexandre B. + + + +Author + +Ott, Ricardo + + + +Author + +Chavari, João L. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019033 + + +2019-09-09 + + +109 + + +1 +20 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019033 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019033 +1678-4766 +13265874 + + + + + + + +Brignolia dasysterna +Platnick, Dupérré, Ott & Kranz-Baltensperger, 2011 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 1-6 +, +58 +) + + + + + + + +Brignolia dasysterna + + +PLATNICK +et al. +, 2011:32 + + + + +, figs 95-141. +Male +holotype +and female +allotype +taken in +Berlese +samples of young hammock forest litter at +Deering Estate Park, SW +167 +th +St. and SW 72 +nd +Ave., +South Miami +, +Dade Co. +, +Florida +, +USA +, + +1.VI–25.VIII.1986 + +, +J. & S. Peck +leg., in +AMNH 37534 +, PBI_ +OON 1270 +, not examined. + + + + + +Brignolia cubana + +: + + +FREITAS +et al. +, 2013:9-10 + + +, 15 (misidentification). + + + + + +Diagnosis. + +Brignolia dasysterna + +can be easily separated from autochthone Neotropical oonopids and from + +B +. +parumpunctata + +by the absence of ventral directed protrusion situated medially on the clypeus (see + +PLATNICK +et al. +, 2011 + +, fig. 96), modified setae on the male sternum ( +Fig. 3 +), male palp with small protrusion on the palpal bulb ( +Figs 5, 6 +; + +PLATNICK +et al. +, 2011 + +, figs 103-108) and females by the low protrusion situated between the epigastric furrow and the groove connecting the posterior spiracles ( +Fig. 4 +). + + +Description. Male and female, see + +PLATNICK +et al. +, 2011:32 + +, figs 95-141. + + +Distribution. This species was recently described by + +PLATNICK +et al. +(2011) + +as being restrict to southern +Florida +, +USA +. It is recorded here to occur in at least four states of north and northeast +Brazil +( +Fig. 58 +), where it may have been introduced earlier than in the +USA +. + +FREITAS +et al. +(2013) + +found a large population of + +Brignolia dasysterna + +(sub + +Brignolia cubana + +) in Fernando de Noronha archipelago. + + + +Material +examined. +BRAZIL +. + +Pará + +: +Uruará +( +03°43’03”S +- +53°44’14”W +), +3♀ +, 2014, +R. L. Cajaiba +leg. ( +IBSP 166582 +; +IBSP 166583 +); +Belém +, +Campus +IPEAN (01°24’46.14” - +01°28’4.11”S +- 48°20’4.6”- +48°20’31.84”W +), +2♂ +♀ +, + +2.V.1974 + +, +R. Schuh +( +AMNH +PBI +_ +OON 485-487 +) + +; + + +Pernambuco + +: +Fernando de Noronha +, +Arquipélago de Fernando de Noronha +( +03°50’57.2814”S +- +32°24’10.7922”W +), +51♂ +55♀ +, + +X.2005 + +- + +IV.2006 + +, +G. Freitas +leg. ( +IBSP 67112– 67143 +; +IBSP 67726–67736 +; +IBSP 67852–67882 +) + +; + + +Tocantins + +: +Porto Nacional +, urban area ( +10°42’S +– +48°25’W +), +♀ +, + +14-23. XI.2003 + +, +I. Knysak +& +R. Martins +leg. ( +IBSP 92232 +) + +; + + +Bahia + +: +Salvador +, +Baía +de Aratu +, +Ponte do Fernandinho +( +12°47’32.8”S +– +38°28’15.3”W +) + +; + +♀ +, + +13.IX.2004 + +, +K. Benati +leg. ( +IBSP 58898 +) + +; + +IpiaÚ ( +14°8’18.8844”S +- +39°45’47.6028”W +), +♂ +, 2008, +J. Cardoso +leg. ( +IBSP 121852 +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/AE/B7/03AEB775FF9CFFB3DDF50C55FDAB24EC.xml b/data/03/AE/B7/03AEB775FF9CFFB3DDF50C55FDAB24EC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..22130c4a5ab --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/AE/B7/03AEB775FF9CFFB3DDF50C55FDAB24EC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,343 @@ + + + +To boldly go: on invasive goblin spiders in Brazil (Araneae, Oonopidae) + + + +Author + +Brescovit, Antonio D. + + + +Author + +Bonaldo, Alexandre B. + + + +Author + +Ott, Ricardo + + + +Author + +Chavari, João L. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019033 + + +2019-09-09 + + +109 + + +1 +20 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019033 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019033 +1678-4766 +13265874 + + + + + + + +Ischnothyreus velox +Jackson, 1908 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 26-30 +, +59 +) + + + + + + + +Ischnothyreus velox +JACKSON, 1908:51 + + +, pl. 4, figs 9-13 ( +Lectotype +male from greenhouse in Chester, +England +, in BMNH); + +SAARISTO, 2001:347 + +(desig. +lectotype +); + + +PLATNICK +et al. +, 2012b:27 + + +, figs 100-132. + + + + + + +Ischnothyreus barrowsi +CHAMBERLIN & IVIE, 1935:9 + + +, pl. II, fig. 7 (female +holotype +from Marco Island, Collier Co., +Florida +, +USA +, in AMNH). + + +PLATNICK +et al. +, 2012b:27 + + +(Syn.). + + + + + + +Ischnothyreus indressus +CHICKERING,1968a:84 + + +, figs 13-20 (male +holotype +from +Nevis +, Leeward Islands, in MCZ; examined); + + +PLATNICK +et al. +, 2012b:27 + + +(Syn.). + + + + + +Diagnosis. + +Ischnothyreus +velox + +differ from + +I +. +peltifer + +by the males lacking a protuberance on the base of the fang; palps with rounded bulb and sperm pore larger than that of + +I +. +peltifer + +( +Figs 28-30 +). Females of + +I +. +velox + +have a distinctively procurved ridge occupying most of the width of the postepigastric scutum ( +Fig. 27 +). + + +Description. Male and female, see + +PLATNICK +et al. +2012b:27 + +, figs 100-132. + + + +Figs 20-30. Figs 20-25, + +Ischnothyreus peltifer +( +Simon, 1891 +) + +, male: 20, dorsal; 23, projection of chelicerae; 24, palp prolateral; 25, palp retrolateral. Female: 21, dorsal; 22, genitalia, ventral. Figs 26-30, + +Ischnothyreus velox +Jackson, 1908 + +, female: 26, dorsal; 27, genitalia, ventral. Male: 28, palp retrolateral; 29, palp prolateral; 30, palp ventral. + + + +Distribution. According to + +PLATNICK +et al. +(2012b) + +, who recorded this species in the state of Amazonas, this Pantropical species was probably introduced in Americas from Asia. The present records in +Brazil +are anecdotic but depict a wide distribution in the Western and Central Amazonia, as well as in the Northeastern state of +Sergipe +( +Fig. 59 +). + + + +Material +examined. +BRAZIL +. + +Acre + +: +Senador Guiomard +, +Reserva Extrativista Catuaba +( +10°12’51.4584”S +- +67°45’17.1216”W +), +♀ +, 2002, +E. Morato +et al. +leg. ( +IBSP 86903 +) + +; + + +Amazonas + +: +Benjamin Constant +( +04°22’58”S +- +70°1’51”W +), +♀ +, 2010, +P. S. Pompeu +et al. +leg. ( +IBSP 166574 +) + +; + +Coari +, +Rio Urucu +, +Base de Operações Geólogo Pedro de Moura +( +04°52’16”S +- +65°20’04”W +), +♂ +, +♀ +, + +11-20.VII.2003 + +, +A. B. Bonaldo +, +J. Dias +& +D. Guimarães +leg. ( +MPEG 10212 +, +10214 +; +PBI +_ +OON 40693 +, +40725 +) + +; + + +Sergipe + +: +Simão Dias +, +Toca da Raposa +( +10°43’46.992”S +- +37°50’54.9702”W +), +2♀ +, + +20.VI.2014 + +, no col. ( +IBSP 166579-166580 +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/B2/EC/03B2EC28FF884F61FEC720A46B463EA5.xml b/data/03/B2/EC/03B2EC28FF884F61FEC720A46B463EA5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e7434acfc22 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/B2/EC/03B2EC28FF884F61FEC720A46B463EA5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,359 @@ + + + +Redescription and new records of Synopia ultramarina Dana (Amphipoda: Synopiidae) from off the northeastern Brazil, with comments on its morphological variations + + + +Author + +Senna, André R. + + + +Author + +Andrade, Luiz F. + + + +Author + +Guedes, Urssula N. + + + +Author + +Pereira-Filho, Guilherme H. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2020 + +e 2020017 + + +2020-07-24 + + +110 + + +1 +11 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020017 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2020017 +1678-4766 + + + + + + + +Synopia ultramarina +Dana, 1853 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 2–29 +) + + +Material examined. + +1♀ +, dissected and drawn, + +September 2012 + +, +Fernando de Noronha Archipelago +, +Pernambuco state +, +Brazil +, +03°49’2.51”S +, +32°23’34.10”W +, + +12 m + +deep, rhodolith beds ( +UERJ 542 +) + +; + +1♀ +, in 70% ethanol, same sampling data ( +UFBA 2288 +) + +; + +1♀ +, dissected, same sampling data ( +UFBA 2289 +) + +; + +1♀ +, in 70% ethanol, same sampling data ( +UFBA 2292 +) + +; + +1♀ +, dissected and drawn, + +1 January 2001 + +, +Petrobras +1 PEP 1 500J (2), +Ceará state +, +Brazil +, +03°07ʼ53.2ˮS +, +38°49ʼ26.2ˮW +, + +36 m + +deep, soft bottom ( +MOUFPE 19642 +) + +; + +1♀ +, dissected and drawn, + +1 December 2000 + +, REVIZEE NE IV #165, 6th campaign, +Pernambuco state +, +Brazil +, +8°08’06ˮS +, +34°38’7.08ˮW +, without depth data, bottom of bioclastic sand with granules and gravel ( +MOUFPE 14566 +) + +. + + +Diagnosis. +Head +protuberant with anterior keel. Accessory eye with 2–3 ommatidia. +Antenna 1 +, primary flagellum, article 1 callynophorate, remaining articles scarcely setose. +Mandible +palp, article 2 very stout, medial margin with row of setules and 1 long pappose seta. Right +lacinia mobilis +apically bifid. Left +lacinia mobilis +with 4 apical teeth. +Maxilla 1 +inner plate distally rounded. +Maxilla 2 +inner plate rounded, with medial row of long setae. +Pereopods 5–6 +, basis with posteroventral corner rounded. +Uropods 1–2 +, rami, margins setulose. +Telson +longer than wide, laterally smooth, with a slight acclivity or laterally serrate. + + +Description. Based on females, UERJ 542 and MOUFPE 19642 ( +Fig. 2 +). +Head +( +Fig. 3 +) protuberant with anterior keel; rostrum short; accessory eyes with 2 ommatidia. +Antenna 1 +( +Fig. 4 +), peduncular article 1, anterior and posterior margins with 1 distal short seta each; article 2 anterior margin with 1 short seta distally, posterior margin with 2 short setae distally; article 3 naked; accessory flagellum 2-articulate; primary flagellum 5-articulate, article 1 with 8 callynophore. +Antenna 2 +( +Fig. 5 +), peduncular article 3 anterior margin produced distally with a short seta, posterior margin with 1 medial short seta; articles 4–5 weakly setose with few short setae; flagellum 9-articulate. +Upper lip +( +Fig. 7 +) rounded, apical margin with a small notch, setose. +Right mandible +( +Fig. 11 +), molar strongly triturative and with a group of setules basally, incisor with 4 teeth, +lacinia mobilis +apically bifid, accessory setal row with 2 multicuspidate and 2 apically bifid setae; palp ( +Fig. 13 +) 3-articulate, article 1 short and subtriangular; article 2 very stout, about twice longer than wide, medial margin with row of setules and 1 pappose seta subdistally; article 3 very short, with 2 apical pappose setae. +Left mandible +( +Fig. 10 +), lacinia mobilis with 4 teeth. +Lower lip +( +Fig. 6 +), outer lobe laterally and apically setose, inner lobe apically setose. +Maxilla 1 +( +Fig. 8 +), inner plate with 3 long medial pappose setae and 1 short apical seta; outer plate medial margin with row of setules, apically with 6 stout setae; palp 2-articulate, article 2 lateral margin with row of long setules, apically with 4 multicuspidate stout setae and 2 short simple setae. +Maxilla 2 +( +Fig. 9 +), inner plate with distal field of setules, facial row of long setae present, medial and apical margins with row of long setae. +Maxilliped +( +Fig. 12 +), inner plate about 0.4× the length of outer plate, medial margin with 1 plumose seta, apically with 2 slender and 1 stout plumose seta; outer plate about 0.8× the length of palp articles 1 and 2 combined, medial margin with 3 plumose setae, apical and lateral margins with 1 long plumose seta each; palp 4-articulate, article 2 with a row of 9 long plumose setae on the medial margin; article 3 with two pairs of subapical plumose setae; article 4 short, bearing a long apical slender seta. + + + +Fig. 2. + +Synopia ultramarina +Dana, 1853 + +, habitus (MOUFPE 19642). Scale bar: 1.0 mm. + + + + +Figs. 3–13. + +Synopia ultramarina +Dana, 1853: 3 + +, head; 4, 5, antennae 1–2; 6, lower lip; 7, upper lip; 8, 9, maxillae 1–2; 10, 11, left and right mandibles; 12, maxilliped (UERJ 542); 13, palp of mandible (MOUFPE 19642). Scale bars: 0.2 mm for Figs 4, 5; 0.1 mm for the remains. + + + + +Figs. 14–17. + +Synopia ultramarina +Dana, 1853: 14 + +, 15, gnathopods 1–2; 16, 17, pereopods 3–4 (MOUFPE 19642). Scale bars: 0.3 mm. + + + +Pereon. +Gnathopod 1 +( +Fig. 14 +) simple; coxa short, about 0.7× the length of coxa 2, with 2 posterodistal short setae; basis about 3.5× longer than wide, anterior margin with 2 long setae on a distal lobe, posterodistal corner with 1 seta; ischium short and subquadrate, posterodistal corner with 1 long pappose seta; merus posterior margin with 3 pappose setae; carpus twice longer than wide, anterior margin with 2 long pappose setae distally, posterior margin setose, with a row of long plumose setae; propodus ovate, about 1.6× longer than wide, anterior margin with 2 pappose setae distally, posterior margin setose with row of long plumose setae; palm acute; dactylus about 80% the length of propodus, nail elongate. +Gnathopod 2 +( +Fig. 15 +) simple; coxa small, postero ventral margin with 2 setae; basis about 5.2× longer than wide, posterior margin with 2 long setae; ischium short and subrectangular, posterodistal corner with 1 seta; merus posterior margin with 2 short setae; carpus 3.8× longer than wide, posterior margin setose, with a row of long pappose setae; propodus 4.7× longer than wide, anterior margin with 1 long pappose seta distally, posterior margin setose, with a row of long pappose setae plus 2 longer pappose setae distally; dactylus vestigial, nail present. +Pereopod 3 +( +Fig. 16 +), coxa with posterior lobe subquadrate and produced, posterodorsal margin excavate, ventral margin convex; basis 4.2× longer than wide, posterior margin with 3 setae, posteroventral corner with 1 seta; ischium short and subrectangular, posterior margin with 3 setae; merus1.5× longer than wide, anterior margin with 1 long plumose seta distally, posterior margin with 3 plumose setae; carpus 1.9× longer than wide, posterior margin setose, with a row of plumose setae; propodus posterior margin setose, with a row of plumose setae plus 1 longer plumose seta distally; dactylus about 50% the length of propodus, nail present. +Pereopod 4 +( +Fig. 17 +), coxa subtriangular, postero distal lobe produced; basis 4.5× longer than wide, anterior margin with 3 long setae, posterodistal corner with 1 long seta; ischium short and subrectangular, posterodistal corner with 1 seta; merus 2.2× longer than wide, anterodistal margin produced, with 1 long plumose seta, posterior margin with 3 plumose setae; carpus twice longer than wide, posterior margin setose with a row of plumose setae;propodus 2.2× longer than wide, posterior margin setose, with a row of plumose setae; dactylus about 60% the length of propodus, nail present. +Pereopod 5 +( +Fig. 18 +), coxa subtriangular and smooth; basis 1.2× longer than wide, suboval, posteroventral corner rounded; ischium short and subquadrate; merus anterior margin with 2 medial and 1 distal stout seta, posterior margin with 1 stout seta distally; carpus anterior margin with 1 medial and 2 distal stout setae, posterior margin with 1 stout seta distally; propodus 8.7× longer than wide, anterior margin with 1 medial and 2 distal stout setae, posterior margin with 1 medial and 1 distal stout seta; dactylus elongate, about 90% the length of propodus. +Pereopod 6 +( +Fig. 19 +), coxa subrectangular, posteroventral lobe weakly produced; basis 1.4× longer than wide, suboval, posteroventral corner rounded; ischium short and subrectangular; merus anterior and posterior margins with 1 stout seta distally; carpus anterior margin with 1 stout seta distally, posterior margin with 2 stout setae distally; propodus 8.4× longer than wide, anterior margin with 1 medial and 1 distal stout seta, posterior margin with 1 medial stout seta; dactylus elongate, about 60% the length of propodus. +Pereopod 7 +( +Fig. 20 +), coxa subrectangular, posteroventral corner weakly produced; basis 1.8× longer than wide, anterodistal corner with 1 short seta, posterodistal lobe well developed, subacute, almost reaching half of merus; ischium short and subrectangular; merus anterior and posterior margins with 1 stout seta distally; carpus, anterior margin with 1 medial and 2 distal stout setae, posterior margin with 1 distal stout seta; propodus 6× longer than wide, anterior margin with 3 medial and 2 distal stout setae, posterior margin with 2 distal stout setae; dactylus stout, about 60% the length of propodus. + + + +Figs. 18–23. + +Synopia ultramarina +Dana, 1853: 18–20 + +, pereopods 5–7; 21–23, epimeral plates 1–3 (UERJ 542). Scale bars: 0.2 mm. + + + + +Figs. 24–29. + +Synopia ultramarina +Dana, 1853: 24–26 + +, uropods 1–3; 28, telson (MOUFPE 19642); 27, telson (UERJ 542); 29, telson (MOUFPE 14566). Scale bars: 0.3 mm for Figs 24, 25; 0.1 for Fig. 27; 0.2 mm for the remains. + + + +Pleon. +Epimeral plate 1 +( +Fig. 21 +), anterior margin slightly concave, ventral margin naked, posteroventral corner rounded, posterior margin convex. +Epimeral plate 2 +( +Fig. 22 +), anterior margin convex, ventral margin naked, posteroventral corner slightly produced into a subacute angle; +Epimeral plate 3 +( +Fig. 23 +), anterior margin convex, ventral margin naked, posteroventral corner subquadrate, posterior margin almost straight. +Urosomite 1 +, anterodistal margin produced intoan acute tooth, with a weak sinuosity above. +Uropod 1 +( +Fig. 24 +), peduncle 3.3× longer than wide,dorsal margin with 2 stout setae medially and 1 apically; outer ramus dorsolaterally setulose, apical margin with 3 stout setae; inner ramus 1.4× longer than outer ramus, ventrolaterally setulose, dorsal margin with 1 stout seta medially and 4 apically. +Uropod 2 +( +Fig. 25 +), peduncle 2.6× longer than wide, dorsal margin with 1 stout seta medially and 1 apically; outer ramus slightly shorter than inner, dorsolaterally setulose, apical margin with 2 stout setae; inner ramus 1.2× longer than outer, ventrolaterally setulose, dorsal margin with 1 stout seta, bearing 2 setae apically. +Uropod 3 +( +Fig. 26 +), peduncle short, slightly longer than wide, ventroapical margin with 1 stout seta; outer ramus slightly longer than inner, 2-articulate, article 1 with 2 setae dorsolaterally, article 2 about 30% the length of article 1, apical margin with 3 setae; inner ramus, ventrolateral margin with a proximal row of setules and 5 setae, apical margin with 2 setae. +Telson +( +Figs. 27-29 +) 1.6× longer than wide, about 70% cleft, longer than peduncle of uropod 3, each lobe with 2 lateral setae, distalmost placed on a slight acclivity, and one long apical seta. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/C6/D7/03C6D701FFC1FFE8FC74FC3AFB18FDC5.xml b/data/03/C6/D7/03C6D701FFC1FFE8FC74FC3AFB18FDC5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c4db734e55d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/C6/D7/03C6D701FFC1FFE8FC74FC3AFB18FDC5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1173 @@ + + + +New records and a new species of Scaphopoda (Mollusca) from the southwestern Atlantic Ocean + + + +Author + +Souza, Leonardo S. + + + +Author + +Caetano, Carlos Henrique S. + + + +Author + +Scarabino, Fabrizio + + + +Author + +Costa, Paulo Márcio S. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2020 + +e 2020023 + + +2020-09-09 + + +110 + + +1 +12 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020023 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2020023 +1678-4766 + + + + + + + +Cadulus platensis +Henderson, 1920 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 19–27 +) + + + + +Figs 13–18. + +Bathoxiphus ensiculus +( +Jeffreys, 1877 +) + +. 13–17, MNRJ 60821, same shell; 18, MNRJ 60823. 13, 18, entire shell, lateral view; 14, entire shell, anterior view.15, detail of the apex; 16, detail of ventral aperture; 17, detail of dorsal aperture.Scale bars: 13, 14, 18= 5 mm; 15, 16= 0.5 mm; 17= 0.2 mm. + + + + +Tab. I. Morphometric data (in millimeters, except ratios) of studied scaphopods. The horizontal bars (―) indicates unavailable data.Abbreviations:Arc: height of curvature; Dmax: distance of the maximum diameter to the ventral aperture; Hd: height of dorsal aperture; Hv: height of ventral aperture; L: length; Larc: distance of the point of maximum curvature to the dorsal aperture; Max: maximum diameter; SD: standard deviation; Wd: width of dorsal aperture; Wv: width of ventral aperture. Source of data: 1: Present study; 2: +DALL (1881) +; 3: +HENDERSON (1920) +; 4: +NICKLÈS (1979) +. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
SpeciesType material / VouchersLMaxL/MaxDmaxArcLarcHdWdHd/ WdHvWvHv/ WvSource
NHMUK 1877.11.18.56a15.6―9.6―0.96.0―――1.91.21.61
NHMUK 1877.11.18.56b12.8―10.2―0.85.1―――2.01.21.71
NHMUK 1877.11.18.56c8.5―15.5―0.32.7―――0.90.61.51
+ +B. ensiculus + +NHMUK 1885.11.5.13449.2―13.6―0.63.4―――1.10.71.61
NHMUK 1885.11.5.134514.8―9.1―0.95.3―――1.91.01.81
NHMUK 1885.11.5.134622.0―6.4―1.78.9―――2.41.71.41
USNM 9534719.0―12.7―1.8―――――――3
MNRJ 6082117.3―11.2―1.56.80.50.31.51.71.11.51
MNRJ 6082312.5―12.7―1.25.80.40.31.41.30.91.51
Mean14.6―11.2―1.15.50.40.31.41.71.01.6
±SD4.4―2.7―0.51.90.1000.50.30.1
+ +C. cucurbitus + +MCZ 77504,01.253.2――――0.4――0.6―2
+ +C. exiguus + +NHMUK 1887.2.9.94 NHMUK 1887.2.9.941.9 1.80.9 0.92.2 2.10.9 1.0― ―― ―― ―― ―― ―― ―― ―― ―1 1
Mean1.80.92.11.0――――――――
±SD0000――――――――
USNM 1728582.40.92.61.2――――――――1
+ +C. gibbus + +NHMUK 1885.11.5.12872.41.12.31.2――――――――1
Mean2.41.02.41.2――――――――
±SD00.10.20――――――――
USNM 8874765.41.83.02.7――0.80.81.10.50.60.91
+ +C. platensis + +MNRJ 272045.41.73.22.7――0.90.81.20.60.60.91
MNRJ 272043.91.54.51.9――0.70.80.90.50.51.01
Mean4.91.63.62.4――0.80.81.10.50.60.9
±SD0.80.20.80.4――0.100.10.10.10.1
+ +C. rossoi + +MNHN- IM-2000-303231.80.92.10.9――――――――4
USNM 1695025.51.92.92.9――――――――1
+ +C. tumidosus + +USNM 169502 USNM 1695025.2 4.81.5 1.93.4 2.62.8 2.4― ―― ―― ―― ―― ―― ―― ―― ―1 1
USNM 1695025.11.73.12.7――――――――1
Mean5.21.73.02.7――――――――
±SD0.30.20.40.2――――――――
+ +C. victori + +CZUFS SCA-00005 MNRJ 344664.4 5.01.9 2.12.3 2.42.2 2.5― ―― ―0.6 0.70.7 0.70.9 0.90.9 1.00.8 1.01.1 1.11 1
Mean4.72.02.32.3――0.60.70.90.90.91.1
±SD0.40.10.10.2――00.100.10..0
+ + + + + + +Cadulus platensis +HENDERSON, 1920:147 + + +, pl. 20, fig. 14. + + + + + +Cadulus platensis + +― + +DALL,1927:19 + +; + +SCARABINO,1970:41 + +; + +1975:182 + +, pl. 58, fig. 884 [reproduced from original illustration]; 1985:201, pl. 73, fig. 1029 [reproduced from original illustration]; 1994:309, pl. 107, fig. 1517; + +STEINER & KABAT, 2001:440 + +; + +2004:631 + +; + +SCARABINO, 2003:193 + +; + +CAETANO & SCARABINO,2009:455 + +[fig. at the top of the page, not fig. 1287]. + + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +( +USNM 887476 +, +1 +shell) + +. + +Paratypes +: from type locality, +USNM 330845 +[2 shells]; USA, + +Florida + +, off +Fernandina +, +USBF +sta. 2415, 30°44ʼN 79°26ʼW, + +805 m + +[440 fms], coll. + +Steamer +Albatross + +, + +01/ iv/1885 + +( +USNM 108279 +, +2 +shells); + +Georgia + +, off +Georgia +, +USBF +sta. 2668,30°58ʼ30ˮN +79°38ʼ30ˮW +, + +538 m + +[294 fms], coll. + +Steamer +Albatross + +, + +05/v/1886 + +( +USNM 108172 +, +7 +shells; +AMNH 148340 +, +1 +shell); BRAZIL, + +Ceará + +, +USBF +sta. 2760, 12°07ʼS 37°17ʼW, + +1864 m + +[1019 fms], coll. + +Steamer +Albatross + +, + +18/xii/1887 + +( +USNM 95447 +, +1 +shell) + +. + + + +Type +locality. +Originally +stated as +ARGENTINA +, +Buenos Aires +, off +Río de la Plata +, +USBF +sta. 2764, 36°42ʼS 56°23ʼW, + +21 m + +[11.5 fms]. Corrected to: +BRAZIL +, + +Rio de Janeiro + +, +USBF +sta. 2763, 24°17ʼS 42°48ʼW, + +1228 m + +[671 fms] ( +SCARABINO, 2003 +: footnote 3; see Remarks) + +. + + + +Material +examined. +Type +material. +BRAZIL +: + +São Paulo + +: off +Santos +( + +3059 m + +), coll. +R +/ +V +Wladimir Besnard +, 1975 ( +MORG 20181 +, +1 +shell); off +Santos +, 23°57ʼS 46°19ʼW, + +400 m + +, coll. +R +/ +V +Wladimir Besnard +( +MZSP 119362 +†, 8 shells); + +Rio Grande do Sul + +: +Rio Grande Rise +, ERG sta. 001, +29°53ʼ24ˮS +36°39ʼ21ˮW +, + +1439–1689 m + +, coll. +Supply Boat Astro Garoupa +, + +07/vi/2011 + +( +MNRJ 27204 +†, 2 shells) + +. + + + +Figs 19–27. + +Cadulus platensis +Henderson, 1920 + +. 19–22, holotype (USNM 887476); 23–26, MNRJ 27204: 23, 24, same shell; 25, 26, same shell; 27, MZSP 119362.19, 23, 25, 27, entire shell, lateral view; 20, 24, 26, entire shell, anterior view; 21, detail of dorsal aperture; 24, detail of ventral aperture. Scale bars: 19, 20,23–27= 1 mm; 21, 22= 0.4 mm. + + + +Distribution. +USA +: +Georgia +, Florida; +Brazil +: +Ceará +( +HENDERSON, 1920 +), +SÃo Paulo +( +RIOS, 1994 +; +CAETANO & SCARABINO, 2009 +), +Rio Grande do Sul +(Rio Grande Rise) (this study). + + +Remarks. The +holotype +of + +C. platensis + +( +USNM +887476) ( +Figs 19–22 +) and two other +paratypes +( +USNM +330845) were supposedly collected off “Río de la Plata”, +Argentina +( +USBF +sta. 2764), a shallow locality, while the other records were in bathyal depths. +HENDERSON (1920:15) +himself doubted the reliability of the record: “A false note is touched in an 11-fathom station off Rio de la Plata quoted four times in our table, and in each instance for deep-water species of other stations. I feel quite sure that some error has been made in recording this station (No. 2714) [sic, misquote for 2764] by the +United States +Fish Commission”. The same doubt was raised by +QUINN (1979:14–15 +; +1983:358–361 +) for records of some Vetigastropoda. + + +TOWNSEND (1901) +reported that the same sampling equipment was used in the +USBF +sta. 2763 and sta. 2764, which were sequentially sampled and may lead to a contamination of the samples. Based on these doubts and facts, +SCARABINO (2003:193 +, footnote 3) corrected the +type +locality of + +C. platensis + +to off +Rio de Janeiro +, +Brazil +, at the +USBF +sta. 2763. Furthermore, the latter author also supported his decision based on the presence of this species in samples collected off +Rio de Janeiro +during the +MD +55 expedition. There are similar cases of gastropods collected from the same locality, as + +Carenzia trispinosa +(Watson, 1879) + +and + +Pendroma perplexum +Dall, 1927 + +. + +Carenzia trispinosa + +was recorded by +QUINN (1979) +at the +USBF +sta. 2764, and is also known from samples collected by the +MD +55 expedition off +Rio de Janeiro +( + +SALVADOR +et al. +, 2014 + +). However, in the case of this gastropod, + +SALVADOR +et al. +(2014) + +did not discuss about the presence of the species in the +USBF +sta. 2764 and considered the distribution of + +Carenzia trispinosa + +in +Argentina +, although not including the shallow record in the bathymetric range of the species. + +Pendroma perplexum + +is also known from samples of the +MD +55 (F. Scarabino, pers. obs.) and belongs to a family constituted by bathyal species ( +Pendromidae +; +WARÉN 1991 +). These cases reinforce +SCARABINO’s (2003) +hypothesis about the correct +type +locality of + +C. platensis + +. + + +Based on the explanations above, the southernmost record of + +C. platensis + +is currently off +SÃo Paulo state +, +Brazil +( +SCARABINO, 1994 +; +CAETANO & SCARABINO, 2009 +). +CAETANO & SCARABINO (2009:455) +presented confusing figures and the order of the images are corrected here to avoid confusions: from the top of the page, the species figured are + +Cadulus platensis + +, + +Gadila braziliensis +( +Henderson, 1920 +) + +, + +Gadila dominguensis +(d’Orbigny, 1842) + +and + +Cadulus parvus +Henderson, 1920 + +. + + +In the present study, we report a new record of + +C. platensis + +in the +Rio Grande +Rise, South Atlantic, extending the geographic distribution of the species southward. The two shells collected there ( +Figs 23–26 +) closely resemble the morphology of the +holotype +of + +C. platensis + +( +Figs 19–22 +). One of the shells from +Rio Grande +Rise is a younger specimen ( +Figs 25, 26 +), but the largest one ( +Figs 23, 24 +) presents similar dimensions with the +holotype +( +Tab. I +). + + +The present species is closely related to + +Cadulus tumidosus +Jeffreys, 1877 + +( +Figs 28–35 +), from eastern Atlantic, regarding shell morphology. +HENDERSON (1920) +recognized these similarities and the shape variation at the equator in both of them, but preferred to separate the western Atlantic specimens introducing a new name. +HENDERSON (1920) +described + +C. platensis + +with a somewhat larger shell than + +C. tumidosus + +, but the dimensions are very similar. We add that + +C. platensis + +can be distinguished by the slowly reduction of the diameter of the shell towards the dorsal aperture ( +Figs 19, 23, 25, 27 +), while this reduction is more abrupt in + +C. tumidosus + +( +Figs 28, 30, 32, 34 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/C6/D7/03C6D701FFC1FFEDFC31FCF2FA92FC40.xml b/data/03/C6/D7/03C6D701FFC1FFEDFC31FCF2FA92FC40.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bcc87ea0fef --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/C6/D7/03C6D701FFC1FFEDFC31FCF2FA92FC40.xml @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ + + + +New records and a new species of Scaphopoda (Mollusca) from the southwestern Atlantic Ocean + + + +Author + +Souza, Leonardo S. + + + +Author + +Caetano, Carlos Henrique S. + + + +Author + +Scarabino, Fabrizio + + + +Author + +Costa, Paulo Márcio S. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2020 + +e 2020023 + + +2020-09-09 + + +110 + + +1 +12 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020023 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2020023 +1678-4766 + + + + + + + +Cadulus +Philippi, 1844 + + + + + + + +Type +species. + +Dentalium ovulum +Philippi,1844 + +, by monotypy. + + +Diagnosis. See + +CAETANO +et al. +(2006) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/C6/D7/03C6D701FFC3FFEFFC48FD14FB52F9C8.xml b/data/03/C6/D7/03C6D701FFC3FFEFFC48FD14FB52F9C8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6411f27e282 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/C6/D7/03C6D701FFC3FFEFFC48FD14FB52F9C8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@ + + + +New records and a new species of Scaphopoda (Mollusca) from the southwestern Atlantic Ocean + + + +Author + +Souza, Leonardo S. + + + +Author + +Caetano, Carlos Henrique S. + + + +Author + +Scarabino, Fabrizio + + + +Author + +Costa, Paulo Márcio S. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2020 + +e 2020023 + + +2020-09-09 + + +110 + + +1 +12 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020023 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2020023 +1678-4766 + + + + + + + +Bathoxiphus +Pilsbry & Sharp, 1897 + + + + + + + +Type +species. + +Dentalium ensiculus +Jeffreys,1877 + +, by subsequent designation ( +BOISSEVAIN,1906:48 +). + + +Diagnosis. Shell small to medium in size, strongly arched, solid, polished, usually smooth or with thin longitudinal sculpture. Apex truncated, lumen circular. Section oval, strongly laterally compressed. Radula with high rachidian tooth, anterior margin simple, rounded with latter half folded inward; lateral teeth present two pointed primary cusps and 5 to 6 subequal secondary cusps; marginal teeth slightly curved (adapted from +SCARABINO, 1995 +; +SCARABINO & SCARABINO, 2010 +). + + +Remarks.Aside from the +type +species, three other are currently included in the genus: + +Bathoxiphus soyomaruae +Okutani, 1964 + +(bathyal and abyssal, +Japan +, +New Caledonia +and the Indian Ocean), + +Bathoxiphus inexpectatus +Scarabino, 1995 + +(bathyal, +New Caledonia +, Pacific Ocean) and + +Bathoxiphus kathieae +Scarabino & Scarabino, 2010 + +(bathyal, +Solomon Islands +, Pacific Ocean) ( +CHISTIKOV, 1983 +; +SCARABINO, 1995 +, 2008; +SCARABINO & SCARABINO, 2010 +). + + +The species of + +Bathoxiphus + +usually have smooth shells, but + +B. kathieae + +presents longitudinal sculpture of thin ribs which is the main difference from his congeners. Despite the different sculpture, + +B. kathieae + +has the conspicuous radular morphology shared by all species of the genus. The diagnosis of the genus is updated here. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFA5E3AFCFBFD3B02B31A38.xml b/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFA5E3AFCFBFD3B02B31A38.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fb0ff8b1144 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFA5E3AFCFBFD3B02B31A38.xml @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@ + + + +The Centris bees described by Ezra Townsend Cresson (Hymenoptera: Apidae) + + + +Author + +Vivallo, Felipe + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2020 + +e 2020020 + + +2020-08-17 + + +110 + + +1 +7 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 +1678-4766 + + + + + + + +Centris +( +Xanthemisia +) +aethiops +Cresson, 1865 + + + + + + + +( +Figs. 11, 12 +) + + + +Centris aethiops +CRESSON + +, 1865.4:193. + + + +Type data. +This +species was described based on a single female specimen collected in an unknown locality in +Cuba +. +The +holotype +is housed at +ANSP +and has the following data label: +109 ♀ +[handwrItten]\ +CUba +. [prInted]\ [red label] +HoloTYPE +[printed] 2623 [handwritten] ( +ANSP +). + + + + +Type +locality. +Greater Antilles +: +Cuba + +. + + +Comments. + +Centris caymanensis +Vivallo, 2014 + +; + +C. domingensis +Dalla Torre, 1896 + +and + +C +. +aethiops + +are the only species of +C +. ( +Xanthemisia +) present in the Caribbean, being the latter species the only that has been recorded in +Cuba +. The female has the body completely covered by dark brown pilosity ( +Figs. 11, 12 +), except for the light brown or yellowish pilosity near the pronotal lobe, and the clypeus and terga with relatively uniform punctation. Photos of both sexes can be found in +VIVALLO (2014) +. This species has been recorded in +Bahamas +, +Cuba +and +Jamaica +( +VIVALLO, 2014 +). The +type +locality cannot be further narrowed down than to +Cuba +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFA5E3AFF7DFD5B03BD1D42.xml b/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFA5E3AFF7DFD5B03BD1D42.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2c9c8222731 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFA5E3AFF7DFD5B03BD1D42.xml @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ + + + +The Centris bees described by Ezra Townsend Cresson (Hymenoptera: Apidae) + + + +Author + +Vivallo, Felipe + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2020 + +e 2020020 + + +2020-08-17 + + +110 + + +1 +7 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 +1678-4766 + + + + + + + +Centris +( +Paracentris +) +lanosa +Cresson, 1872 + + + + + + + +( +Figs. 9, 10 +) + + + + + +Centris lanosa +CRESSON, 1872 + +. 4:284. + + + + + +Type data. +CRESSON (1872) +described this species based on +three males +collected in +Texas +, southern +United States +. +In +1916, he designated the +lectotype +which is currently housed at +ANSP +. The specimen has the following data label: Tex. [prInted]\ +♂ +[prInted]\ [red label] +LectoTYPE +[prInted] 2624 [handwritten] ( +ANSP +). + + + + +Type +locality. +United States +: +Arizona state +: +Texas + +. + + +Comments. The +type +series were collected by the Swedish collector Gustaf Wilhelm Belfrage (1834–1882). He was a prodigious collector and one of the best of his time. According to +GEISER (1933) +the number of new and interesting species discovered by Belfrage was astonishing, considering that they were collected in a very limited area of +Arizona State +. During 1866, Belfrage entered into correspondence with several entomologists, including Cresson. They encouraged him to make a trip to +Texas +to collect insects ( +GEISER, 1933 +) during which the +type +specimens of + +C +. +lanosa + +were collected. The females have the first flagellomere slightly shorter than the following three segments combined and the metasoma with bluish metallic reflections. Males can be identified by the yellowish hairs on head and mesosoma ( +Fig. 10 +), by the paraocular area, the base of the mandible and the anterior surface of the scape yellow ( +Fig. 9 +); and by the clypeus with relatively dense punctation, except for a longitudinal unpunctate median line on disc. + +Centris lanosa + +has been recorded in the American states of +Oklahoma +, +Kansas +, +Texas +and +Florida +( + +MOURE +et al. +, 2007 + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFB5E3BFF51FD4F06FE1B80.xml b/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFB5E3BFF51FD4F06FE1B80.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..aaabafa3080 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFB5E3BFF51FD4F06FE1B80.xml @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@ + + + +The Centris bees described by Ezra Townsend Cresson (Hymenoptera: Apidae) + + + +Author + +Vivallo, Felipe + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2020 + +e 2020020 + + +2020-08-17 + + +110 + + +1 +7 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 +1678-4766 + + + + + + + +Centris +( +Xanthemisia +) +armillata +Cresson, 1869 + + + + + + + + +Centris armillatus +CRESSON, 1869 + +. 2:298. Junior synonym of + +C +. +aethiops +( +SNELLING, 1966 +) + +. + + + + + +Type data. +Cresson +proposed this new species based on a single male specimen collected in an unknown locality in +Cuba +. +The +holotype +is housed at +IESH +(Gundlach collection) and unfortunately it was not available during the development of this article + +. + + + +Type +locality. +Greater Antilles +: +Cuba + +. + + + +Comment. The male of this species has the mesoscutum with a band of pale yellow pilosity on the anterior margin, contrasted with the blackish pubescence of the rest of the body; and the punctation of the clypeus is uniformly distributed. The +type +locality cannot be further narrowed down than to +Cuba + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFC5E3DFCF9FA1E06CF1EFD.xml b/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFC5E3DFCF9FA1E06CF1EFD.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c58f41293ba --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFC5E3DFCF9FA1E06CF1EFD.xml @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@ + + + +The Centris bees described by Ezra Townsend Cresson (Hymenoptera: Apidae) + + + +Author + +Vivallo, Felipe + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2020 + +e 2020020 + + +2020-08-17 + + +110 + + +1 +7 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 +1678-4766 + + + + + + + +Centris +( +Heterocentris +) +cornuta +Cresson, 1865 + + + + + + + + +Centris +? +cornuta +CRESSON, 1865 + +. 4:194, 195. + + + + + +Type data. +Cresson +described this species with doubts about whether it belonged to + +Centris + +or not, given its particular morphology. +It +was described based on a single female specimen collected in an unknown locality in +Cuba +. +The +holotype +is housed at +IESH +(Gundlach collection) and unfortunately it was not available during the development of this article + +. + + + +Type +locality. +Greater Antilles +: +Cuba + +. + + +Comments. This is one of the morphologically rarest species of the genus, so far only known from female specimens. They have mandibles dark brown, longer than the length of the compound eye (in frontal view) with two teeth relatively similar in size on the distal half; disc of the mesoscutum and dorsal surface of hind tibia with brown pubescence and metasoma dark brown. Unfortunately it is not easy to find in collections and nothing is known about its bionomy. Photographs can be found in +VÉLEZ & VIVALLO (2012) +. The +type +locality cannot be further narrowed down than to +Cuba +. According to + +MOURE +et al. +(2007) + +, this species has been also recorded in +Haiti +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFD5E3AFCFCFDD405151DE2.xml b/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFD5E3AFCFCFDD405151DE2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ca74e252899 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFD5E3AFCFCFDD405151DE2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ + + + +The Centris bees described by Ezra Townsend Cresson (Hymenoptera: Apidae) + + + +Author + +Vivallo, Felipe + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2020 + +e 2020020 + + +2020-08-17 + + +110 + + +1 +7 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 +1678-4766 + + + + + + + +Centris +( +Heterocentris +) +totonaca +Cresson, 1879 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 7, 8 +) + + + + + +Centris totonaca +CRESSON,1879b + +. 7:213, 214. Junior synonym of + +C +. +analis +( +MOURE, 1960 +) + +. + + + + +Figs 5, 6. + +Centris otomita +Cresson, 1879 + +, holotype male: 5, head, frontal view; 6, habitus, lateral view. + + + + +Figs 7, 8. + +Centris totonaca +Cresson, 1879 + +, holotype female: 7, head, frontal view; 8, habitus, lateral view. + + + + + +Type data. +This +species was proposed based on a single female collected in +Mexico +. +The +holotype +is housed at +ANSP +and has the following data label: Mex. [printed]\ [red label] +HoloTYPE +[printed] 2626 [handwritten] ( +ANSP +). + + + + +Type +locality. +Mexico + +. + + +Comments. The specimen was collected by Francis Sumichrast, the same collector of the +type +specimens of + +C. montezuma + +and + +C +. +otomita + +. Females of this species can be identified by the two yellow triangles on clypeus and the smooth and shiny integument between the punctures of the clypeal disc ( +Fig. 7 +), the orange brown metasoma, the scopa whitish on tibia and brownish on basitarsus ( +Fig. 8 +) and by the orange lanceolate hairs on the lower corner of the pronotum. Photos of both sexes of this species can be found in +VIVALLO & ZANELLA (2012) +. The +type +locality cannot be further narrowed down than to +Mexico +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFD5E3DFF4DFE1402B41D3D.xml b/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFD5E3DFF4DFE1402B41D3D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fab559811d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFD5E3DFF4DFE1402B41D3D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,179 @@ + + + +The Centris bees described by Ezra Townsend Cresson (Hymenoptera: Apidae) + + + +Author + +Vivallo, Felipe + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2020 + +e 2020020 + + +2020-08-17 + + +110 + + +1 +7 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 +1678-4766 + + + + + + + +Centris +( +Heterocentris +) +otomita +Cresson, 1879 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 5, 6 +) + + + + + +Centris otomita +CRESSON, 1879b + +. 7:214. Junior synonym of + +C +. +analis +(Fabricius, 1804) ( +MOURE, 1960 +) + +. + + + + + +Type data. +This +species was described based on a single male specimen collected in an undetermined locality in +Mexico +. +The +holotype +is housed at +ANSP +and it has the following data label: Mex. [printed]\ [red label] +HoloTYPE +[printed] 2627 [handwritten] ( +ANSP +). + + + + +Type +locality. +Mexico + +. + + +Comments. The +holotype +was collected by Sumichrast, the same collector of the type specimens of + +C +. +montezuma + +and + +C +. +totonaca + +. +MICHENER (1954) +proposed + +C +. +otomita + +as a junior synonym of + +C +. +totonaca + +, and subsequently +MOURE (1960) +synonymized this latter species with + +C +. +analis + +. Males of this species can be identified by the tridentate mandibles with the innermost teeth reduced and close to each other, the yellow spot on the anterior surface of the scape ( +Fig. 5 +) and by the mostly blackish pubescence on +T +2- +T +4 ( +Fig. 6 +). This is the most common and widely distributed species of +C +. ( +Heterocentris +). It has been recorded from +Mexico +to southeastern +Brazil +( + +MOURE +et al. +, 2007 + +). The type locality of + +C. otomita + +cannot be further narrowed down than to +Mexico +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFF5E3CFCFDFB8403C31A21.xml b/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFF5E3CFCFDFB8403C31A21.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8b03a49ff5f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFF5E3CFCFDFB8403C31A21.xml @@ -0,0 +1,274 @@ + + + +The Centris bees described by Ezra Townsend Cresson (Hymenoptera: Apidae) + + + +Author + +Vivallo, Felipe + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2020 + +e 2020020 + + +2020-08-17 + + +110 + + +1 +7 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 +1678-4766 + + + + + + + +Centris +( +Hemisiella +) +fulviventris +Cresson, 1865 + + + + + + + + +Centris fulviventris +CRESSON, 1865 + +. 4:193, 194. + + + + + +Type data. +Cresson +described this species based on a single female collected in +Cuba +. +The +holotype +is housed at +IESH + + +and has the following data label: [light brown label with black rim] + +Centris fulviventris + +. [handwritten] 168 [printed]\ [squared label with black rim] +Cr +[handwritten] ( +IESH +) + +. + + + +Type +locality. +Greater Antilles +: +Cuba + +. + + +Comments. The +type +specimen, as well of those of + +C +. +cornuta + +and + +C +. +armillata + +belong to the Gundlach collection. Johannes Christoph Gundlach (1810–1896) was a German- Cuban naturalist and taxonomist. In 1839, he left Europe to make collections on the Caribbean island of +Cuba +, where he lived ever since ( +VILARÓ, 1897 +). In 1875, he changed his name from Johannes Christoph to its Spanish equivalent Juan Cristóbal. He wrote the first major work on the birds ( +GUNDLACH, 1876 +), reptiles ( +GUNDLACH,1880 +) and insects of +Cuba +( +GUNDLACH, 1881 +, +1886 +, +1891 +, +1922 +). The +type +locality cannot be further narrowed down than to +Cuba +. This is the only species of +C +. ( +Hemisiella +) recorded in that country. + + + + +Centris +( +Hemisiella +) +montezuma +Cresson, 1879 + + +(FIgs 1‒4) + + + + + +Centris montezuma +CRESSON, 1879b + +.7:213. Junior synonym of + +C +. +vittata +Lepeletier, 1841 + +( +SNELLING, 1966 +). + + +FIgs 1‒4. + +Centris montezuma +Cresson, 1879 + +, +lectotype +male: 1, clypeus and labrum, lateral view; 2, head, frontal view; 3, lower margin of hind tibia; 4, spine-like projection on the posterior margin of hind basitarsus. + + + + + +Type data. +This +species was described based on +two males +collected in an undetermined locality in +Mexico +. +CRESSON (1916) +designated the +lectotype +which is currently housed at +ANSP +. +The +specimen has the following data label: Mex. [printed]\ [red label] +LectoTYPE +[printed] 2625 [handwritten] ( +ANSP +). + + + + +Type +locality. +Mexico + +. + + +Comments. The +lectotype +was collected by the Swiss ornithologist Francis Sumichrast (1828–1882), the same collector of the type specimens of + +C +. +totonaca + +and + +C +. +otomita + +(see below). The specimen designated the +lectotype +is relatively large and has the spine-like projection on the posterior margin of the hind basitarsus, present in males of the subgenus +C +. ( +Hemisiella +), quite developed (Fig. 4). This makes it seem different from + +C +. +vittata + +, since the males of this later species are usually a bit smaller. Both the difference in body size and that of the projection of the hind basitarsus seem to be due only to a matter of scale, since the smaller males have proportionally a reduced projection. This is also found in the spine-like projection of the distal end of the hind tibia (Fig. 3), which is also variable in males of this species. + + +Both sexes of this species have the pubescence on mesoscutum, mesoscutellum and vertex with black tips and the clypeal disc transversally concave (Figs. 1, 2). Photos of both sexes of this species can be found in +VIVALLO & ZANELLA (2012) +. The +type +locality of + +C. montezuma + +cannot be further narrowed down than to +Mexico +. This species occurs from +Mexico +to +Paraguay +( + +MOURE +et al. +2007 + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/25/10/BF/2510BF14EB6E457EFC0EF9ACFD39FEB2.xml b/data/25/10/BF/2510BF14EB6E457EFC0EF9ACFD39FEB2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0144d775a95 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/25/10/BF/2510BF14EB6E457EFC0EF9ACFD39FEB2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,491 @@ + + + +A closer look at Batillipes dicrocercus and new records of Batillipes potiguarensis (Tardigrada: Arthrotardigrada) from the Brazilian coast with comments on intra- and interspecific variability + + + +Author + +Santos, Érika + + + +Author + +Gomes Jr, Edivaldo + + + +Author + +Rocha, Clélia M. C. da + + + +Author + +Bartels, Paul J. + + + +Author + +Fontoura, Paulo + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2018 + +e 2018041 + + +2018-12-06 + + +108 + + +1 +10 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2018041 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2018041 +1678-4766 +13265956 + + + + + + + +Batillipes potiguarensis +Santos + +, + + + + + +da Rocha, Gomes Jr & Fontoura, 2017 + + + + + + +Material examined: +35 specimens +( +18 females +, +5 males +and +12 juveniles +) collected in +Campos Basin +; and +29 specimens +( +11 females +, +5 males +and +13 juveniles +) collected in Potiguar Basin, both stations located on the Brazilian Coast + +. + + +Description of the examined specimens. + +Batillipes + +specimens with distinct head separated from the body by a neck constriction. Scapular region well developed, protruding laterallY at the level of the first pair of legs. BodY length (caudal apparatus not included) between 105-257 µm ( +Fig. 1 +). Four pairs of blunt ventrolateral body processes are present: a lateral expansion between the head and the first pair of legs; two small lateral processes between the first three pairs of legs and well-developed blunt lateral processes between legs +III +and +IV +( +Figs 1, 2 +). Occasionally, the blunt lateral body projections can present a small protruding tip. In some specimens, the lateral projection between the first and second pair of legs is not visible. The caudal apparatus exhibits high variability: in the majority of the specimens it is bifurcated, composed of two spines inserted in a swollen base ( +Figs 1 +, +3 +). In some specimens, the spines are two short spikes of about 9.7 µm, while other specimens exhibit two longer spines, reaching 23.8 µm. In a few specimens the caudal apparatus is asymmetric and only a single small spike is present ( +Fig. 4, 5 +) or it is restricted to a conspicuous semicircle-shaped protrusion without anY spikes or spines at all ( +Fig. 2 +, +6 +). + + +Dorsal cuticle punctated, with evident transverse folds ( +Fig. 7 +). Dorso-lateral punctation larger (about 7-10 pillars / 10 µm, and each pillar with about 1 µm high) and more widelY spaced than mid-dorsal punctation (about 12- 15 pillars / 10 µm) ( +Fig. 7 +). In the lateral processes between legs +III +and +IV +the cuticle is punctated. The ventral surface, also with transverse folds, is more finelY punctated. + + +Head bearing eleven cephalic appendages. The median cirrus, with cirrophore. Internal cirri inserted dorsally on the frontal edge of the head with cirrophores. External cirri with indistinct cirrophores, inserted more ventrally, near the lateral cirri +A +and primary clavae. The lateral cirrus is located dorsally in relation to the unconstricted, but wrinkled, tubular primary clava. These two appendages share a common pedestal. A van der Land’s organ is present at the base of the primary clava that exhibits a terminal pore. In the frontal edge of the head, well-developed papillarY secondarY clavae are visible ( +Fig. 1 +, arrowhead). All cephalic cirri, including external cirri, and lateral cirri have an optically dense dot (dark when observed under +PHC +) near their swollen tips. Indentations between the external cephalic cirrus and the pedestal bearing the primary clava and lateral cirrus were not seen. + + + +Figs 1,2. + +Batillipes potiguarensis +Santos, Rocha, Gomes Jr & Fontoura, 2017: 1 + +, specimen from our samples with a bifurcated caudal appendage. The arrowhead shows the well-developed secondarY clava; 2, holotYpe with a rounded caudal protrusion. Scale bars: 50 µm. + + + + +Fig. 3-8. + +Batillipes potiguarensis +Santos, Rocha, Gomes Jr & Fontoura, 2017: 3 + +, detail of a bifurcated caudal appendage; 4, posterior portion of the body, showing an asymmetric caudal appendage with one short spike only (arrowhead); 5, posterior portion of the body showing an asymmetric caudal appendage with one short spine only (white arrowhead).The black arrowhead shows the blunt lateral projection between legs III–IV; 6, caudal appendage without spines. The sense organ on leg IV is visible (arrowhead); 7, dorsal cuticle with visible folds and punctation not uniformlY distributed; 8, detail of the first leg showing the oblique tarsus and spatula-like toe discs. Scale bars: 10 µm. + + +Eye spots not observed. Ventral mouth opening in a protruded cone. Ovoid pharyngeal bulb. Placoids not visible after slide mounting. + +Sense organs with swollen tips on legs I and +IV +and spines on legs +II +and +III +. TheY are similar in length in the first three pair of legs (rarely sense organ on leg I is shorter than on legs +II +and +III +). The sense organ on leg +IV +is consistently the shortest and divided into a cirrophore and a distal portion with a basal van der Land’s organ ( +Fig. 6 +, arrowhead). SharplY pointed cirri +E +are present ( +Fig. 4 +). + + +Telescopic legs with long toes with spatula-like suction discs with straight frontal edges and with short and thin braces ( +Figs 1 +, +8 +). The frontal edge of tarsi is oblique in the first three pair of legs, with toes inserted at different levels ( +Fig. 8 +). In these three first pairs of legs, toe 2 is the shortest, toes 3 and 5 are the longest and toes 1, 4 and 6 are medium sized ( +Fig. 1 +). In the fourth pair of legs, medial toes 3 and 4 are of equal lengths (toe arrangement pattern A, according to SANTOS +et al +., 2018). Toes 2 and 5 are the longest and similar to each other; toes 1 and 6, also similar to each other, are of intermediate length ( +Figs 1, 2 +, +8 +). + + + +Tab. I. Measurements (in µm) of selected morphological structures of specimens of + +Batillipes potiguarensis +Santos, Rocha, Gomes Jr & Fontoura, 2017 + +(SD, Standard deviation. Range refers to the smallest and largest measured specimen/structure; N, number of specimens/structures measured). + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Females Adults This studyMales adults This studyJuveniles 6-digit This study +Females SANTOS +et al +., 2017 +
STRUCTURESMean ± SD (Range); NMean ± SD (Range); NMean ± SD (Range); NMean ± SD (Range); N
BodY length (BL)195.3 ±30.41 (146.3-243.3); 29200.4 ±38.65 (140.7-261.4); 10207.5 ±33.70 (125.4-281.2); 25184.5 ±18.04 (152.2–201.1); 6
BL without caudal apparatus179.3 ±31.03 (130.0-228.1); 29182.6 ±38.23 (126.6-243.4); 10191.4 ±34.55 (105.8-257.0); 25–
Body width67.5 ±13.61 (48.7-99.7); 2166.4 ±14.02 (53.9-88.9); 871.9 ±15.21 (48.2-100.4); 1564.5 ±11.26 (47.9–78.1); 6
Median cirrus18.1 ±4.36 (10.4-27.0); 2120.5 ±4.12 (14.7-26.1); 720.0 ±3.17 (11.3-26.6); 2016.0 ±4.20 (10.4–20.5); 4
Internal cirri20.4 ±3.24 (13.3-25.7); 2520.1 ±4.18 (14.8-25.6); 1021.9 ±3.85 (12.2-27.8); 2320.5 ±1.93 (17.0–22.5); 6
External cirri17.2 ±3.09 (10.6-21.6); 2516.8 ±2.74 (12.6-20.0); 817.4 ±2.85 (11.8-21.9); 2416.0 ±3.26 (12.6–20.1); 5
+Lateral cirri +A +33.0 ±5.14 (24.0-43.3); 2331.4 ±8.30 (20.0-46.0); 932.2 ±5.41 (23.0-44.2); 2128.8 ±4.27 (22.7–35.8); 6
Primary clavae17.9 ±3.07 (13.0-22.6); 2717.7 ±5.13 (10.0-26.1); 918.8 ±3.07 (12.0-24.9); 2316.5 ±2.26 (13.4–19.4); 6
Secondary clavae4.9 ±0.66 (3.8-6.5); 274.5 ±1.00 (3.1-6.6); 85.2 ±0.92 (2.8-6.8); 205.1 ±1.05 (3.7–6.2); 5
+Cirri +E +19.3 ±3.62 (14.2-25.4); 1419.0 ±4.17 (12.3-25.3); 617.6 ±5.25 (8.7-27.3); 1420.3 ±2.27 (17.0–22.8); 5
Leg I sense organ9.8 ±2.11 (5.1-14.0); 2410.1 ±2.45 (7.6-13.8); 710.1 ±1.79 (7.0-12.8); 2110.0 ±0.93 (8.3–10.9); 6
Leg II sense organ10.8 ±2.85 (5.7-18.6); 219.7 ±3.01 (6.9-14.9); 710.7 ±3.28 (6.7-19.0); 219.8 ±2.51 (7.3–13.5); 5
Leg III sense organ10.6 ±2.14 (7.0-14.5); 1610.2 ± 3.12 (6.7-14.2); 610.5 ±3.63 (6.3-17.2); 1710.6 ±2.64 (7.2–13.1); 4
Leg IV sense organ8.9 ±1.65 (6.1-11.9); 267.4 ±1.15 (5.8-9.2); 89.4 ±1.60 (6.0-12.3); 228.4 ±1.9 (6.6–11.1); 6
Body projection 17.0 ±1.41 (4.2-9.5); 276.2 ±2.04 (3.4-8.5); 87.5 ±1.58 (5.0-10.8); 236.0 ±1.62 (3.2–7.8); 6
Body projection 26.3 ±2.13 (3.3-11.4); 225.0 ±1.65 (3.5-7.7); 76.3 ±0.97 (5.0-8.8); 184.4 ±1.47 (2.5–6.1); 4
Body projection 39.0 ±2.43 (5.2-15.1); 277.7 ±2.50 (5.1-12.7); 79.3 ±1.73 (6.2-12.3); 225.5 ±1.30 (3.8–7.4); 5
BodY projection 410.4 ±2.11 (6.2-14.7); 2710.5 ±2.9 (6.6-16.7); 910.2 ±2.44 (6.4-15.0); 259.0 ±1.52 (6.6–10.8); 5
BodY projection 4 width15.0 ±3.22 (10.2-23.8); 2612.2 ±3.68 (8.5-19.3); 815.8 ±3.12 (10.5-21.9); 23–
Caudal apparatus (spines)17.2 ±2.65 (9.7-23.0); 2717.8 ±3.34 (13.5-23.8); 1018.3 ±4.01 (13.3-31.7); 22–
Legs I-III toe 113.4 ±2.73 (9.8-22.2); 2013.5 ±3.56 (9.7-18.6); 714.3 ±2.26 (10.0-18.1); 2110.9 ±0.50 (10.3–11.5); 4
Toe 29.2 ±1.99 (6.8-13.1); 149.0 ±2.47 (5.0-11.0); 710.0 ±2.06 (5.7-14.7); 198.2 ±1.83 (6.5–10.8); 4
Toe 321.4 ±3.10 (17.2-28.2); 2019.7 ±4.98 (14.6-27.1); 722.3 ±3.40 (13.7-28.1); 2318.6 ±1.06 (17.6–19.7); 4
Toe 413.3 ±1.87 (11.7-18.1); 1712.6 ±3.81 (8.5-16.8); 713.3 ±2.52 (6.7-17.0); 2211.7 ±1.93 (9.5–14.2); 4
Toe 524.2 ±3.76 (18.2-31.6); 1825.0 ±6.02 (18.2-32.9); 725.2 ±3.69 (17.0-31.8); 2321.8 ±1.43 (20.6–23.4); 3
Toe 616.6 ±2.52 (12.3-21.0); 1716.5 ±2.88 (12.3-20.5); 717.1 ±2.00 (12.2-20.7); 2114.0 ±1.38 (12.4–15.0); 3
Leg IV toe 118.6 ±2.81 (14.6-23.6); 2018.8 ±2.80 (16.0-23.8); 619.8 ±2.46 (16.7-24.3); 18- (17.5–20.4); 2
Toe 226.9 ±4.09 (19.2-33.5); 2328.0 ±4.62 (22.1-35.2); 628.7 ±5.37 (12.8-39.1); 18- (25.6); 1
Toe 314.7 ±2.84 (8.1-20.1); 2115.0 ±2.93 (11.6-19.8); 616.0 ±2.11 (11.0-20.0); 1613.3 ±2.70 (10.3–15.5); 3
Toe 414.6 ±2.67 (8.5-19.0); 2114.9 ±2.97 (12.2-20.0); 616.0 ±2.80 (11.5-24.1); 1613.4 ±2.60 (10.6–15.7); 3
Toe 528.1 ±4.45 (18.0-34.3); 2226.6 ±3.02 (22.8-30.0); 528.8 ±3.39 (20.0-33.4); 19- (25.7–27.5); 2
Toe 618.9 ±2.10 (16.0-22.4); 2018.3 ±2.72 (15.4-22.7); 619.2 ±2.48 (15.3-24.0); 1718.8 ±1.01 (17.1–19.1); 3
Gonopore-Anus11.6 ±1.93 (8.9-16.0); 215.1 ±2.11 (3.4-10.4); 9–9.0 ±2.21 (6.6–11.1); 5
+ +In females, the gonopore is rosette-shaped delimited by four punctate cuticular platelets, two anterior and two posterior, forming a groove running toward the anus. Males have a circular gonopore with a cuticular crescent shaped fold. +Four-toed larvae were not found. + +Morphometric data are provided in +Table I +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/2D/4A/0A/2D4A0A6F0B07FFBEFC00D1B0FE47FE6D.xml b/data/2D/4A/0A/2D4A0A6F0B07FFBEFC00D1B0FE47FE6D.xml index 6906b83ee79..d81fc5bf517 100644 --- a/data/2D/4A/0A/2D4A0A6F0B07FFBEFC00D1B0FE47FE6D.xml +++ b/data/2D/4A/0A/2D4A0A6F0B07FFBEFC00D1B0FE47FE6D.xml @@ -1,48 +1,49 @@ - - - -A new species of Falsocaenia (Coleoptera: Lycidae) from Brazil + + + +A new species of Falsocaenia (Coleoptera: Lycidae) from Brazil - - -Author + + +Author -Nascimento, Elynton A. do +Nascimento, Elynton A. do - - -Author + + +Author -Bocakova, Milada +Bocakova, Milada -text - - -Iheringia, Série Zoologia +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia - -2019 - -e 2019019 + +2019 + +e 2019019 - -2019-05-23 + +2019-05-23 - -109 + +109 - -1 -3 + +1 +3 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019019 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019019 -journal article -10.1590/1678-4766e2019019 -1678-4766 +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019019 +1678-4766 +13265742 @@ -60,7 +61,7 @@ ( -Figs 1–4 +Figs 1–4 ) @@ -97,7 +98,7 @@ A new species of BOCAKOVA - + Figs 1–4. @@ -161,12 +162,12 @@ and Ferreira, 2016 and can be differentiated by presenting longer yellow stripes at humeral region. Male genitalia robust in lateral view with basal half straight dorsally in lateral view, with strong ventral constriction after phallus midlength in lateral view. Phallobase larger than phallus + parameres in ventral view. Female genitalia with valvifers forming thin ventral bridge straight posteriorly ( -Figs 2–4 +Figs 2–4 ). Description. Body dark brown to black, pronotum dark brown with lateral sides yellow, elytra dark brown to black with humeral region to 1/3 basal elytra yellow ( -Fig. 1 +Fig. 1 ). Male with maxillary palpomeres 1–2 light brown, palpomeres 3–4 dark brown and labial palpomeres dark brown. In female, maxillary palpomeres 1–2 light brown, palpomere 3 with basal half light brown and apical half dark brown and ultimate palpomere dark brown; first labial palpomere light brown, palpomere 2 with basal half light brown and apical half dark brown, ultimate palpomere dark brown. Legs dark brown, except for whole trochanter and basal 1/5, that present light yellow color. Antennae dark brown, last antennomere with distal 1/3–1/4 yellow in male, antennae entirely dark brown in female. @@ -177,15 +178,15 @@ male and in female, palpomere 3 two times longer than male, and 1.5 time longer than 4 in female. Ultimate palpomere apically pointed. Antennae serrate, with antennomere 4 about 1.1× longer than antennomere 3 and 5. Prosternum triangular, mesosternum trapezoidal. Pronotum transverse, trapezoidal, widest at base, median longitudinal carina bifurcate, forming longitudinal groove in distal half, medially 1.2–1.3 time wider than long. Scutellum with deep median distal emargination. Elytra slender, 3.2× longer than wide in humeral portion in male and female, widest in distal third. Each elytron with three longitudinal costae, costa 3 present basally with solely vestiges along the elytra ( -Fig. 1 +Fig. 1 ). Legs compressed, tibiae 1.1× longer than femur and three times longer than trochanter. Male sternum 8 with shallow median distal emargination. Male terminal sternum elongate, proximally rounded. Spiculum gastrale absent. Male genitalia with terminal circular enlargement of phallus as wider as parameres width medially, phallus 1.2 times longer than parameres length, robust in lateral view with basal half of dorsal portion almost straight in lateral view, ventral portion presenting strong constriction after phallus midlength in lateral view. Phallobase larger than phallus + parameres in ventral view ( -Figs 2, 3 +Figs 2, 3 ). Female genitalia flattened, valvifers strongly shortened, basally fused forming thin ventral bridge ( -Fig. 4d +Fig. 4d ) with posterior margin almost straight, coxites long, medially emarginated ( -Fig. 4b +Fig. 4b ) and approached in distal third, styli as long as half of coxites ( -Fig. 4 +Fig. 4 ). Body length: 5.9 mm (male) and diff --git a/data/33/1D/87/331D87BA9A6CD966D66FFEF4FA2AE8C6.xml b/data/33/1D/87/331D87BA9A6CD966D66FFEF4FA2AE8C6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..60e108952de --- /dev/null +++ b/data/33/1D/87/331D87BA9A6CD966D66FFEF4FA2AE8C6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,466 @@ + + + +A new species of Antillorena from Colombia (Araneae: Zodariidae: Lachesaninae) + + + +Author + +Quijano-Cuervo, Luis G. + + + +Author + +Brescovit, Antonio D. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2018 + +e 2018039 + + +2018-11-29 + + +108 + + +1 +7 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2018039 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2018039 +1678-4766 +13265824 + + + + + + + +Antillorena sanjacintensis + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs 1-11 +, +14-17 +) + + + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub: +805A52F4-24E6-47A4-9D26- 8851B462892D + + + +Type material. + +Male +holotype +from +Vereda La Flecha +, +9°51’26.61”N +, +75°10’48.46”W +, + +470-520 m + +, +San Jacinto +, +Bolívar +, +Colombia +, + +IX. 2014 + +, +L. Quijano +col. (ICN-Ar 8229) + +. + +Paratypes +: +3♂ +frOm the same LOcaLity Of +hOLOtype +( +2♂ +ICN-Ar 8231; +♂ +IBSP 168379 +) anD +♀ +(ICN-Ar8230) anD +3♂ +( +2♂ +ICN-Ar 8232; +♂ +IBSP 168740 +) from +Reserva Campesina La Montaña +, +10°46’02.6”N +, +75°02’34”W +, + +160-250 m + +, +Usiacurí +, +Atlántico +, +Colombia +, + +III.2016 + +, +L. Martinez +col. + + + +Other material examined +. +One subadult +male, +two subadult +female and + +one juvenile +from the same locality of +holotype +(ICN-Ar 8231) + +. + + +EtymOLOgy. The specific name refer tO tOpOnym San Jacinto, one of the municipality where the +type +specimens were collected. + + +Diagnosis. Males of + +A +. +sanjacintensis + +sp. nov. +are similar to those of + +A +. +polli + +(see Figs 12,13; +Jocqué, 1991:35 +, figs 48-51, 94) by the simpLe VentraL tibiaL apOphysis, the origin and shape of the cymbium basal projection and by the size, direction and shape of the median apophysis. However, can be distinguished by having the retrolateral tibial apophysis with the distal area shorter and acuminate at the tip, narrower and longer proximal tegular apophysis and by the shorter and bent conductor than in + +A +. +polli + +( +Figs 3-5 +; 8,9; 14-17). The females resemble those of the + +A +. +polli + +by the long folding of the ducts with more than seven tUrns, bUt Differs by the pOre Of the atriUm at the pOsteriOr border of the median septum ( +Figs 6 +, +10 +) and by presenting eight turns of the ducts ( +Figs 7 +, +11 +). + + +Description. Male ( +holotype +, ICN-Ar 8229). Total length 7.46. Carapace 3.92 long, 2.65 wide. Carapace pear-shaped, dark brown, highest at the fovea region and clearer. Labium triangular, brown. Endites orange-brown, with white apex. Chelicerae and sternum brown. Legs orange-brown, except the femora with green-brown color. Abdomen dark grey dorsally with a pattern of white spots on the median area arriving just before of the spinnerets, ventrally white with black lines in the lateral and medial areas. Spinnerets orange ( +Fig. 1 +). Eye sizes and interdistances: PLE>PME>ALE>AME; AME: 0.114, ALE: 0.125, PME: 0.130, PLE: 0.134, AME-AME: 0.04, AME-ALE: 0.10, PME-PME: 0.07, PME-PLE: 0.18, ALE-PLE: 0.05, MOQ: 0.27 anterior width, 0.33 posterior width, 0.30 long. Leg formula: 4123. Leg measurements: I femur 2.46/ patella 1.29/ tibia 1.97/ metatarsus 1.88/ tarsus 0.90/ total 8.52; II 2.24/ 1.26/ 1.57/ 1.72/ 0.92/ 7.74; III 1.97/ 1.09/ 0.92/ 1.79/ 0.84/ + + + +Figs 1, 2. + +Antillorena sanjacintensis + +sp. nov. +: 1, male (holotype, ICN-Ar 8229), dorsal view; 2, female (paratype, ICN-Ar8230), dorsal view.Scale: 2 mm. + + + + +Figs 3-7. + +Antillorena sanjacintensis + +sp. nov. +, male palp (holotype, ICN-Ar 8229): 3, prolateral view; 4. retrolateral view, 5. retrodorsal view. Female (paratype, ICN-Ar 8230): 6, Epyginum, ventral view; 7, vulva, dorsal view (A, atrium; Co, conductor; Cy, cymbium; E, embolus; FD, fertilization ducts; LD, lateral depression; MA, median apophysis; MS, median septum; P, cymbial retrolateral projection; Po, pocket; PTA, proximal tegular apophysis; RTA, retrolateral tibial apophysis; VA, ventral tibial apophysis. Scale: palp (0.5 mm); epyginum and vulva (0.2 mm). + + + +6.64; IV 2.35/ 1.25/ 1.55/ 2.64/ 0.95/ 8.76. Leg spination: III patella d0-0-1, p0-1-0, r0-1-1, v0; tibia d1-1-0, p0-1-1, r1-1-1, v2-2-2; metatarsus d1-2-2, p0-0-1, r1-1-1, v2-2-2; tarsus d0, p0, r0, v0-1-2. IV patella d0-0-1, p0-1-0, r0-1-1, v0; tibia d1-1-0, p0-1-1, r1-1-1, v2-2-2; metatarsus d1-2- 2, p0-0-1, r1-1-1, v2-2-2; tarsus r0-0-1. Palp: retrolateral tibial apophysis long with a curved tip. Cymbium with a retrolatero-basal projection. Tegulum with a long and curved proximal tegular apophysis and a ventral tegular apophysis; median apophysis long and curved, with base covered by tegulum; hyaline and voluminous apical conductor, embolus S-shaped extremely long, originating from retrolateral side ( +Figs 3-5 +; +8, 9 +; +14-17 +). Female ( +Paratype +, ICN-Ar 8230 +) +. Total length 8.36. Carapace 3.53 long, 2.16 wide. Carapace pear-shaped, brown, less intense than in the male, highest at the fovea region. Labium triangular, brown. Endites light brown with white apex. Chelicerae and sternum brown. Legs and abdomen as in male ( +Fig. 2 +). Eye sizes and interdistances: PLE>PME>ALE>AME; AME: 0.107, ALE: 0.123, PME: + + +0.127, PLE: 0.135, AME-AME: 0.028, AME-ALE: 0.109, PME-PME: 0.059, PME-PLE: 0.152, ALE-PLE: 0.042, MOQ: 0.226 anterior width, 0.309 posterior width, 0.292 long. Leg formula: 4123. Leg measurements: I femur 1.75/ patella 1.11/ tibia 1.53/ metatarsus 1.23/ tarsus 0.81/ total 6.45; II 1.81/ 0.97/ 1.26/ 1.29/ 0.82/ total 6.18; III 1.59/ 0.82/ 0.89/ 1.35/ 0.79/ total 5.45; IV 2.01/ 0.97/ 1.38/ 1.91/ 0.87/ total 7.16. Leg spination: I metatarsus d0, p0, r0, v2- 2-2 II tibia d0, p0, r0, v0-2-0; metatarsus d0, p0, r0, v2-2-2, III patella d0-0-1, p0-1-0, r1-1-0; v0; tibia d1-1-0, p0-1-1, r1-1-1, v2-1-2; metatarsus d2-2-2, p0-0-1, r0-0-1, v2-1-2; tarsus d0, p0, r-0-1-0, v0-1-2; IV patella d0-0-1, p0-1-0, r1-1-0, v0; tibia d1-1-0, p0-1-1, r1-1-1, v2-2-2; metatarsus d2-2-2, p0-1-0, r0-1-1, v2-2-2; tarsus d0, p0-1-0, r0, v0-1-2. Epigynum with shallow lateral depressions, atrium oval, median septum triangular with two large pockets ( +Figs 6 +, +10 +); internally, long copulatory ducts, basal rounded spermathecae and long fertilization ducts in the base of spermathecae ( +Figs 7 +, +11 +). + + +Variation. Length ( +7 males +): total: 6.46-7.98; carapace: 3.48-4.15; femur I: 2.53-2.93. + + + +Figs 8-11. + +Antillorena sanjacintensis + +sp. nov. +, male palp (holotype, ICN-Ar 8229): 8, ventral view; 9, retrolateral view. Female (Paratype, ICN-Ar 8230): 10, Epyginum, ventral view; 11, vulva, dorsal view (A, atrium; Co, conductor; Cy, cymbium; E, embolus; FD, fertilization ducts; LD, lateral depression; MA, median apophysis; MS, median septum; P, cymbial retrolateral projection; Po, pocket; PTA, proximal tegular apophysis; RTA, retrolateral tibial apophysis; VA, ventral tibial apophysis, VTA, ventral tegular apophysis. Scale: palp (0.5 mm); epyginum and vulva (0.2 mm). + + + + +Figs 12, 13. + +Antillorena polli +(Simon, 1887) + +, male palp (AMNH 00326278): 6, retrolateral view; 7, prolateral view (Co, conductor; Cy, cymbium; E, embolus; MA, median apophysis; PTA, proximal tegular apophysis; RTA, retrolateral tibial apophysis). Scale: palp (0.5mm). + + + + +Figs 14-17. + +Antillorena sanjacintensis + +sp. nov. +, male palp (ICN-Ar 8231): 14, prolateral view; 15, retrolateral view; 16, median apophysis and conductor, prolateral view; 17, proximal tegular apophysis, retrolateral view. Scales: 14, 15 (0.5mm), 16, 17 (0.3mm). + + + + +Figs 18, 19. Landscape where + +Antillorena sanjacintensis + +sp. nov. +was found in Colombia: 18, Reserva Campesina La Montaña (Usiacurí); 19, Vereda La Flecha (Bolívar). + + + + +Fig. 20. Distribution records of the genus + +Antillorena + +in South America and the Lesser Antilles. + + + +Natural history. The specimens of + +A +. +sanjacintensis + +sp. nov. +were found in leaf litter, open trail and near of low grasslands, in a landscape with dry tropical forest in the northern from +Colombia +( +Figs 18, 19 +). + + +Distribution. +Atlántico +and +Bolívar +departments, +Colombia +( +Fig. 20 +). + + + + + +Key to species of + +Antillorena + + + + +1. Female…………………................……………………… +2 Male +………………………...................................…….... 5 + + +2. Epigynal plate with broad median septum and globose pockets, internally, copulatory ducts with three coils ( +Brescovit & Ruiz, 2011 +: fig. 9) ….................. + +A +. +patapata +Epigynal + +plate with triangular median septum and elongate pockets, internally, copulatory ducts with more than three coils (Figs 10,11; +Brescovit & Ruiz, 2011 +:fig. 15) ….…. 3 + + +3. Copulatory ducts with four coils ( +Brescovit & Ruiz, 2011 +:fig. 16) ……........................................………. + +A +. +gaia + +COpULatOry DUcts with mOre than fiVe cOiLs ( +Fig. 11 +) ....…. 4 + + +4. Copulatory ducts with eight coils, oval atrium, medium septum with large pockets ( +Fig. 11 +) ……............................. .................................………………. + +sanjacintensis + +sp. nov. +Copulatory ducts with seven coils, lung-shaped atrium, medium septum with straight pockets ( +Jocqué, 1991 +:fig. 51) …….…....….…………………………………. + +A +. +polli + + + +5. RTA short and straight, with less than half the length of the cymbium ( +Brescovit & Ruiz, 2011 +:fig. 8) …………… ………………………....……...………......… + +A +. +patapata +RTA + +elongate, with almost half the length of the cymbium ( +Figs 3-5 +, +9 +, +14, 15 +; +Brescovit & Ruiz, 2011 +:fig. 14) ………………………..….……………….…………. 6 + + +6. RTA with bifiD DistaL tip, shOrt PTA with enLargeD base ( +Jocqué, 1991 +:fig. 48) ………….......….................. + +A +. +polli +RTA + +with acuminate distal tip, long PTA with straight base ( +Figs 3-5 +; +9 +; +14, 15 +; +Brescovit & Ruiz, 2011 +:fig. 14).…...…...……………...……………….…………….… 7 + + +7. Embolus long, almost three times the length of the palp, cymbium without dorsal depression, conductor with conspicuous base and not covered by the tegulum, sinuous RTA ( +Figs 3-5 +, +8,9 +, +14, 15 +).……. + +A +. +sanjacintensis + +sp. nov. +Embolus short, almost two times the length of the palp; cymbium with dorsal depression, conductor without conspicuous base and covered by the tegulum, straight RTA ( +Brescovit & Ruiz, 2011 +:figs 13, 14) ....……… + +A +. +gaia + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD95601A48FF24BAD3FC6CFF56.xml b/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD95601A48FF24BAD3FC6CFF56.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6a4af4ba3a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD95601A48FF24BAD3FC6CFF56.xml @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ + + + +Revisão dos gêneros Lachaerus e Clavidesmus (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae, Onciderini) + + + +Author + +Giorgi, Adriano José + + + +Author + +Monné, Miguel A. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2018 + +e 2018044 + + +2018-12-06 + + +108 + + +36 +36 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2018044 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2018044 +1678-4766 +13265812 + + + + + + + +Clavidesmus indistinctus +Dillon & Dillon, 1952 + + + + + + + + + + +Clavidesmus indistinctus +DILLON & DILLON, 1952:74 + + +; + +CHEMSAK, 1977:174 + +(type); + +MONNÉ, 2005:544 + +(cat.); + +NEARNS & TAVAKILIAN, 2012:17 + +, fig. 7e; + +NEARNS & MAIER, 2016:4 + +, figs. 6a, b ( +holótipo +). + + + + +Localidade-tipo +: +Brasil +, +Bahia +. ( +FMNH +) + +. + +Distribuição: +Brasil +( +Bahia +, +Espírito Santo +) + +. + + + +Tegumento preto. Corpo completamente coberto por pubescência amarela e castanho-escura, com pequena mancha glabra no centro do disco do pronoto. Pubescência amarela forma larga faixa longitudinal desde a margem posterior dos lobos inferiores até a margem anterior do protórax; estreita faixa centro-longitudinal desde o vértice até o escutelo. A cada lado do centro, superiormente ao tubérculo lateral, faixa estreita ao longo do protórax. Élitros, faixa indistinta diagonal pós-mediana estendendo-se da margem até a sutura. Pubescência semelhante cobre as pernas, e os esternitos torácicos e abdominais. +Pubescência castanho-escura distribuída em toda a superfície elitral, formando pequena mancha triangular atrás dos lobos oculares superiores; faixa longitudinal descendente, a partir da extremidade inferior da margem posterior dos olhos, alargando-se em direção ao protórax, sem alcançá-lo. A cada lado do pronoto estreita e mal delimitada faixa, desde a margem posterior dos lobos oculares superiores até a margem posterior do pronoto. No quarto apical dos élitros pubescência castanho-escura, disposta em duas manchas, uma circular central e outra alongada paralela à margem. Pubescência castanho-escura na face interna dos meso- e metafêmures. +Antenas parcialmente cobertas por pubescência predominantemente amarela, densamente concentrada nos três antenômeros basais; antenômeros IV-XI semiglabros, opacos; pubescência castanho-escura reveste a metade apical dos antenômeros IV, VI, VIII, X e XI e, ventralmente, o quinto distal do III. + +DimensÕes, em mm, +♂ +. Comprimento total, 16,4; comprimento do protórax, 2,7; comprimento dos élitros, 10,4; maior largura do protórax, 3,6; largura umeral, 5,0. + + + +Material +examinado. +BRASIL +, + +Espírito Santo + +: +Linhares +, +♂ +, + +XI.1963 + +, +B. Silva +col. ( +MNRJ +) + +. + + +Comentários. Diferencia-se das outras espécies de + +Clavidesmus + +pela seguinte combinação de caracteres: corpo ornamentado por pubescência castanho-escura; pernas pubescentes; mácula glabra e brilhante no centro do disco do pronoto. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD95611A48FF10BD11FE34FE1F.xml b/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD95611A48FF10BD11FE34FE1F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..717040f2d04 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD95611A48FF10BD11FE34FE1F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,168 @@ + + + +Revisão dos gêneros Lachaerus e Clavidesmus (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae, Onciderini) + + + +Author + +Giorgi, Adriano José + + + +Author + +Monné, Miguel A. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2018 + +e 2018044 + + +2018-12-06 + + +108 + + +36 +36 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2018044 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2018044 +1678-4766 +13265812 + + + + + + + +Clavidesmus funerarius +( +Lane, 1958 +) + + + + + + + + + + +Orteguaza funeraria +LANE, 1958:13 + + +, fig. 2; + +BREUNING, 1971:265 + +; +MONNÉ, + + + +2005:302 (cat.); + +WAPPES +et al +., 2006:25 + +(distr.); + +LINGAFELTER +et al +., + + + + + +2014:68, figs. 72w, x ( +holótipo +). + + + + + + +Clavidesmus funerarius +; + + +NEARNS & TAVAKILIAN, 2012:17 + +, fig. 7c. + + + +Localidade-tipo: +Bolívia +, La Paz: Tumupasa. (USNM). Distribuição: +BolÍvia +(La Paz). + + + +Tegumento preto. Corpo completamente revestido por pubescência preta, cobrindo quase a totalidade da superfície corporal e pubescência amarela formando uma estreita faixa diagonal descendente, a partir da margem posterior dos olhos até a margem anterior do portórax; essa faixa conecta-se à faixa longitudinal que se estende da margem anterior à posterior do protórax; uma peQuena mancha no centro do metepisterno; mancha triangular na extremidade posterior do metasterno; máculas laterais nos esternitos abdominais, mais concentradas no VII. +Nos élitros, a pubescência amarela forma: curta e estreita faixa sutural centro-longitudinal no terço basal; estreita faixa pós-mediana oblÍQua da margem para a sutura, sem atingi-la; no quarto apical duas manchas em cada élitro, uma paralela e aproximada da margem e outra central. +Antenas parcialmente revestidas por pubescência predominantemente preta, densamente concentrada nos três primeiros antenômeros; IV-XI semi-glabros, opacos; pubescência esbranQuiçada na base do escapo. + +DimensÕes, em mm. +♀ +. Comprimento total, 19,5; maior largura do protórax, 5,0; largura umeral, 7,0. + + + +Material +examinado. +BOLÍVIA +, + + +La Paz + + +: +Tumupasa +, +♀ +, 1921-1922, +W.M. Mann +, +Mulford Biological Expl. +( +Holótipo +, +USNM +) + +. + + +Comentários. Distingue-se das demais espécies de + +Clavidesmus + +por apresentar corpo predominantemente revestido por pubescência preta. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD95631A4BFC78BB83FBC6FE50.xml b/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD95631A4BFC78BB83FBC6FE50.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3b22b3e9ca0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD95631A4BFC78BB83FBC6FE50.xml @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ + + + +Revisão dos gêneros Lachaerus e Clavidesmus (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae, Onciderini) + + + +Author + +Giorgi, Adriano José + + + +Author + +Monné, Miguel A. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2018 + +e 2018044 + + +2018-12-06 + + +108 + + +36 +36 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2018044 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2018044 +1678-4766 +13265812 + + + + + + + +Clavidesmus rogueti +Audureau, 2012 + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 6 +) + + + + + + + +Clavidesmus rogueti +AUDUREAU, 2012:62 + + +, figs. 1, 2. + + + +Localidade tipo: +Peru +, +Huanuco +: Tingo María. (AACP). Distribuição: +Peru +. + + + + + +Material +examinado. +PERU +. + +Madre de Dios + +: + +12 km +E Mazuco + +, +Pte.Amanapu +, +13°02’51”S +, +70° 20’55”W +, + +382 m + +, + +18-22.VII.2012 + +, +R. Cavichioli +, +J. A. Rafael +, +A. P. M. Santos +& +D. M. Takiya +col. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD956C1A44FF20BA8AFC38FD35.xml b/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD956C1A44FF20BA8AFC38FD35.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bf4e46b3e21 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD956C1A44FF20BA8AFC38FD35.xml @@ -0,0 +1,245 @@ + + + +Revisão dos gêneros Lachaerus e Clavidesmus (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae, Onciderini) + + + +Author + +Giorgi, Adriano José + + + +Author + +Monné, Miguel A. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2018 + +e 2018044 + + +2018-12-06 + + +108 + + +36 +36 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2018044 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2018044 +1678-4766 +13265812 + + + + + + + +Lachaerus rubigineus +( +Dillon & Dillon, 1949 +) + +, +comb. nov. + + + + + + +( +Fig. 3 +) + + + + + + + +Clavidesmus rubigineus +DILLON & DILLON, 1949:11 + + +; + +MONNÉ, 2005:544 + +(cat.); + +NEARNS & TAVAKILIAN, 2012:17 + +, fig. 7i. + + + + +Localidade-tipo: +Brasil +, +Santa Catarina + +: + +Corupá. ( +AMNH +). +Distribuição +: +Brasil +( +EspÍrito Santo +, +São Paulo +, +Paraná +, +Santa Catarina +) + +. + + + + +Tegumento castanho-escuro. Corpo ( +Fig. 3 +) coberto por pubescência amarela e castanha. Pubescência amarela densamente concentrada nas laterais do protórax, inferiormente ao tubérculo lateral, cobre completamente as pernas, os esternitos torácicos e abdominais. +Essa +pubescência forma a cada lado do meio, uma estreita faixa longitudinal, desde a fronte, entre os tubérculos anteriores, até a margem anterior do protórax; na altura do istmo ocular, faixa diagonal descendente, a partir da margem posterior dos olhos, alargando-se em direção ao protórax, sem alcançá-lo; na fronte, faixa estreita paralela ao epistoma, desde a margem da fronte até a borda anterior do protórax, sem alcançá-lo. Pubescência vermelha entremeada na amarela. Pubescência castanha formando estreita faixa centro-longituinal a partir da fronte, entre os tubérculos antenais, até a margem anterior do protórax; a cada lado do centro, larga faixa longitudinal, desde os lobos oculares superiores até a margem anterior do protórax; faixa diagonal descendente, a partir da extremidade inferior da margem posterior dos olhos, alargando-se em direção à margem do protórax, sem atingi-lo; na metade basal de cada élitro, uma mancha centro-longitudinal, que não atinge os úmeros nem a sutura; na altura do declive apical, larga faixa diagonal pós-mediana estendendo-se em direção ao ápice a partir da margem até a sutura elitral; no quarto apical duas manchas indistintas, uma circular no centro de cada élitro, outra longitudinal, paralela à margem externa. + +Antenas parcialmente cobertas por pubescência castanha, densamente concentrada nos três primeiros antenômeros; antenômeros IV-XI semiglabros, opacos; pubescência amarela cobre ventralmente a metade basal dos antenômeros I e III; pubescência esbranQuiçada a partir do antenômero IV. Antenômero XI curvado a partir do quarto apical, nos machos arredondado no ápice. +Fronte lisa entre os tubérculos antenais, estes com projeção pouco desenvolvida nos machos. Pronoto completamente coberto por pubêscencia, sem tubérculos. Élitros com margens póstero-internas contÍguas. Esternito levemente sinuoso no ápice. + +DimensÕes, em mm, +♂ +/ +♀ +. Comprimento total, 14,2- 16,7/13,6-15,3; comprimento do protórax, 2,7-2,9/2,7-33; comprimento dos élitros, 10,3-12,2/9,1-10,4; maior largura do protórax, 3,5-3,9/3,3-3,8; largura umeral, 4,6-5,5/4,6-5,4. + + +Material examinado. +BRASIL +, + +Espírito Santo + +: Colatina, +♀ +, +XI.1971 +, A. Silva col.; + +Conceição da Barra +( +Pedro Canário +) + +, +♀ +, +X.1976 +, E. dos Santos col.; + +Linhares + +, +♀ +, +II.1966 +, +♀ +, +XI.1966 +, +♂ +, +XII.1966 +, +♀ +, +I.1967 +, +♀ +, +X.1970 +, +♂ +, +♀ +, +XI. 1970 +, A. Maller col. + + +São Paulo + +: +Amparo + +, +♂ +.; + +MarÍlia + +, +♀ +, +XI.1945 +, H. Zellibor col. + + +Paraná + +: +Santa Mariana + +, +♀ +, +XI.1951 +, H. Zellibor col. + + +Santa Catarina + +: +Corupá + +, +♂ +, 1940, +♂ +, +II.1943 +, A. Maller col. + +( +Todos +MNRJ +) + +. + +Comentários. A distribuição e concentração da pubescência vermelha variam de acordo com a distribuição geográfica. Os exemplares mais meridionais apresentam distribuição mais ampla e maior concentração de pubescência vermelha no corpo. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD956D1A44FC8DBB83FE9DFEF6.xml b/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD956D1A44FC8DBB83FE9DFEF6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3820f07d73a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD956D1A44FC8DBB83FE9DFEF6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,212 @@ + + + +Revisão dos gêneros Lachaerus e Clavidesmus (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae, Onciderini) + + + +Author + +Giorgi, Adriano José + + + +Author + +Monné, Miguel A. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2018 + +e 2018044 + + +2018-12-06 + + +108 + + +36 +36 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2018044 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2018044 +1678-4766 +13265812 + + + + + + + +Lachaerus monnei +( +Giorgi, 1998 +) + +, +comb. nov. + + + + + + +( +Fig. 2 +) + + + + + + + +Clavidesmus monnei +GIORGI, 1998:2 + + +, fig.1; + + +JULIO +et al +., 2000:34 + + +( +holótipo +); + +MONNÉ, 2005:544 + +(cat.); + +NEARNS & TAVAKILIAN, 2012:17 + +, fig. 7h; + + + +MONNÉ & MONNÉ, 2016:70 +( +holótipo +). + + + + + +Localidade-tipo: +Brasil +, +Minas Gerais + +: + +Estação Ecológica de Piratininga +(Lagoa Três Marias, +18º22’S +, +45º19’W +). ( +holótipo +, +MNRJ +). +Distribuição +: +Brasil +( +Minas Gerais +) + +. + + +Tegumento preto. Corpo ( +Fig. 2 +) parcialmente coberto por pubescência amarela e preta, pernas e antenas semiglabras, brilhantes. Pubescência amarela cobrindo completamente os esternitos torácicos. +Essa +pubescência recobre a cada lado do meio, estreita faixa longitudinal desde o vértice, entre os tubérculos antenais, até a margem anterior do protórax; na altura da junção dos lobos oculares, uma faixa diagonal descendente, a partir da margem posterior dos lobos oculares superiores, alargando-se em direção ao protórax; na fronte, uma estreita faixa paralela ao epistoma, desde a margem da fronte até a margem anterior do protórax, sem atingi-lo; discreta faixa longitudinal na face interna dos meso- e metafêmures. Pubescência preta cobre a metade apical do mesepímero, e a região basal e média do mesepisterno, concentrada na superfície média dos esternitos abdominais III e VII e nas extremidades laterais dos esternitos IV, V, VI e VII. +Essa +pubescência forma uma estreita faixa centro-longitudinal a partir da fronte, entre os tubérculos laterais, até a margem anterior do protórax; a cada lado do centro, uma larga faixa longitudinal desde os lobos oculares superiores até a margem anterior do protórax; faixa longitudinal descendente, a partir da extremidade inferior da margem posterior dos olhos, alargando-se em direção ao protórax. Nos élitros, faixa indistinta pós-mediana, estendendo-se em direção ao ápice, da margem para a sutura, no Quarto distal, duas manchas, uma circular no centro de cada élitro e outra longitudinal, paralela à margem externa. + +Antenas parcialmente cobertas por pubescência castanha, densamente concentrada no antenômero III, demais antenômeros semiglabros, I e II brilhantes, IV-XI opacos, pubescência amarela cobre ventralmente a base de escapo e do antenômero III, pubescência esbranQuiçada a partir do antenômero IV. Nos machos, antenômero XI curvado a partir do quarto apical, arredondado no ápice. +Fronte lisa entre os tubérculos antenais, estes com projeçÕes pouco desenvolvidas nos machos. +Pronoto completamente coberto por pubescência, sem tubérculos. Élitros com as margens póstero-internas contíguas. Esternito VII levemente sinuoso no ápice. + +DimensÕes em mm, +♂ +. Comprimento total, 12,8; comprimento do protórax, 1,6; comprimento dos élitros, 8,2; maior largura do protórax, 2,8; largura umeral, 4,1. + + + +Material +examinado. +BRASIL +, + +Minas Gerais + +: +Piratininga +( +Estação Ecológica +de +Piratininga, Lagoa Três Marias +, +18°22’S +, +45°19’W +, + +560 m + +), +♂ +, + +10.XI.1996 + +, +Doug Yanega +col. ( +Holótipo +, +MNRJ +) + +. + + +Comentários. + +Lachaerus monnei + +assemelha-se a + +L +. +rubigineus +( +Dillon & Dillon, 1949 +) + +e diferencia-se pelos caracteres: tegumento preto; pernas semiglabras; pubescência preta forma faixa na cabeça e no pronoto; pubescência vermelha ausente. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD956E1A46FC6ABB83FC4AF892.xml b/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD956E1A46FC6ABB83FC4AF892.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8f29a805d76 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD956E1A46FC6ABB83FC4AF892.xml @@ -0,0 +1,267 @@ + + + +Revisão dos gêneros Lachaerus e Clavidesmus (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae, Onciderini) + + + +Author + +Giorgi, Adriano José + + + +Author + +Monné, Miguel A. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2018 + +e 2018044 + + +2018-12-06 + + +108 + + +36 +36 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2018044 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2018044 +1678-4766 +13265812 + + + + + + + +Clavidesmus heterocerus +( +Buquet, 1852 +) + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 5 +) + + + + + + + +Eudesmus heterocerus +BUQUET, 1852:344 + + +; + +THOMSON, 1868:69 + +; + +1878:18 + +( +type +); + +NEARNS & TAVAKILIAN, 2015:4 + +, fig. 14a, b. + + + + + +Clavidesmus heterocerus +; + + +DILLON & DILLON, 1946:294 + +, pl. 17, fig. 6; + +VIANA, 1972:357 + +(distr.); + +MONNÉ, 2005:544 + +(cat.); + + +WAPPES +et al +., 2006:26 + + +(distr.); + +NEARNS & TAVAKILIAN, 2012:17 + +, fig. 7d. + + + +Localidade-tipo: +Brasil +. (MNHN). Distribuição: +Brasil +( +Espírito Santo +, +Rio de Janeiro +), +Bolívia +( +Santa Cruz +), +Paraguai +. + + + +Macho. Tegumento preto. Corpo completamente coberto de pubescência amarela e castanha. Pubescência amarela cobre as pernas, os esternitos torácicos e abdominais, formando uma larga faixa centro-longitudinal desde o vértice, onde é mais estreita até o escutelo. Pubescência castanha forma uma faixa diagonal descendente a partir da extremidade inferior da margem posterior dos olhos, alargando-se em direção ao protórax; a cada lado do centro uma larga faixa longitudinal, de bordos mal definidos. No declive apical dos élitros essa pubescência forma uma faixa diagonal pós-mediana Que se estende em direção ao ápice a partir da margem externa até a sutura; no quarto distal dos élitros, uma distinta mancha diagonal, apenas mais oblÍQua Que a faixa pós-mediana. +Antenas parcialmente cobertas por pubescência castanha, densamente concentrada nos antenômeros I a III. Antenômeros IV-XI semiglabros, opacos. Pubescência amarela cobre os 4/5 basais do antenômero IV, metade basal dos antenômeros VI, VIII, X e XI e ventralmente, a metade anterior do III. +Lábio com lígula densamente coberta por pelos curtos na face interna. + +DimensÕes, em mm, +♂ +/ +♀ +. Comprimento total, 18,8/18,9; comprimento do protórax, 3,4/3,4; comprimento dos élitros, 12,5/13,2; maior largura do protórax, 4,6/4,2, largura umeral, 6,3/6,2. + + + +Material +examinado. +BRASIL +, + +Espírito Santo + +: +Linhares +, +2♂ +, + +X.1965 + +, +♀ +, + +XI.1965 + +, +2♀ +, + +XII.1966 + +, +2♀ +, + +XI.1967 + +, +♂ +, + +XII.1967 + +, +♂ +, + +XI.1972 + +, +A. Maller +col.; +2♀ +, + +XI.1967 + +, +F. M. Oliveira +col. + +Rio de Janeiro + +: Rio de Janeiro (Corcovado), +♀ +, + +21.XI.1957 + +, +♀ +, + +XI.1961 + +, +♀ +, + +12.XII.1962 + +, +♀ +, + +30.XI.1966 + +, +2♀ +, + +28.XI.1969 + +, +Seabra +& +Alvarenga +(Todos +MNRJ +) + +. + + +Comentários. Diferencia-se das demais espécies de + +Clavidesmus + +, pela combinação de caracteres: pernas completamente cobertas por pubescência; faixa centro-longitudinal alcança apenas o escutelo; sem pubescência castanho-escura; pronoto completamente coberto por pubescência; faixa pós-mediana larga; cabeça coberta por pubescência amarela, ornamentada por faixas de pubescência castanha. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD956E1A46FEF7BB83FE76FB7B.xml b/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD956E1A46FEF7BB83FE76FB7B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..43b96ecebb0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD956E1A46FEF7BB83FE76FB7B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,159 @@ + + + +Revisão dos gêneros Lachaerus e Clavidesmus (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae, Onciderini) + + + +Author + +Giorgi, Adriano José + + + +Author + +Monné, Miguel A. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2018 + +e 2018044 + + +2018-12-06 + + +108 + + +36 +36 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2018044 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2018044 +1678-4766 +13265812 + + + + + + + +Clavidesmus chicae +Giorgi, 1998 + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 4 +) + + + + + + + +Clavidesmus chicae +GIORGI, 1998:3 + + +, fig. 2; + + +JULIO +et al +., 2000:34 + + +( +holótipo +); + +MONNÉ, 2005:543 + +(cat.); + +NEARNS & TAVAKILIAN, 2012:17 + +, fig. 7a; + +MONNÉ & MONNÉ, 2016:70 + +( +holótipo +). + + + +Localidade-tipo: +Brasil +, +São Paulo +: Botucatu. + + + + +(MNRJ). + +Distribuição: +Brasil +( +São Paulo +) + +. + +Tegumento castanho. Corpo completamente coberto por pubescência amarela e castanha. Pubescência amarela cobre completamente cabeça, pernas, esternitos torácicos e abdominais e metade inferior do protórax, forma, nos élitros, duas faixas diagonais pós-medianas estreitas: (1) a primeira de comprimento maior e mais definida, estende-se em direção ao ápice a partir da margem externa até a sutura, (2) a segunda, paralela à primeira, mais apical e menor, não alcança a margem nem a sutura. Pubescência castanha restrita aos élitros e à metade superior do protórax, sem formar faixas ou manchas. Antenas parcialmente cobertas por pubescência castanha, densamente concentrada nos três antenômeros basais; antenômeros IV-XI semiglabros. +DimensÕes, em mm, macho. Comprimento total, 16,3; comprimento do protórax, 2,5; comprimento dos élitros, 10,4; maior largura do protórax, 3,4; largura umeral, 4,9. + + +Material +examinado. +BRASIL +, + +São Paulo + +: +Botucatu +, + +I.1968 + +( +holótipo +♂ +, +MNRJ +) + +. + + +Comentários. Distingue-se das demais espécies de + +Clavidesmus + +pela seguinte combinação de caracteres: tegumento castanho; pernas completamente cobertas por pubescência, os fêmures por pubescência castanha; élitros sem faixa centro-longitudinal; pronoto completamente revestido por pubescência; cabeça com pubescência amarela, sem manchas de outra cor. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD956E1A46FF0BBE38FDC7F980.xml b/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD956E1A46FF0BBE38FDC7F980.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..102a21344d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/8A/4C/87/8A4C87FD956E1A46FF0BBE38FDC7F980.xml @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + + + +Revisão dos gêneros Lachaerus e Clavidesmus (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae, Onciderini) + + + +Author + +Giorgi, Adriano José + + + +Author + +Monné, Miguel A. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2018 + +e 2018044 + + +2018-12-06 + + +108 + + +36 +36 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2018044 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2018044 +1678-4766 +13265812 + + + + + + + +Clavidesmus columbianus +Breuning, 1961 + + + + + + + + + + +Clavidesmus columbianus +BREUNING, 1961:333 + + +; + +MARTÍNEZ, 2000:101 + +(distr.); + +MONNÉ, 2005:544 + +(cat.); + +NEARNS & TAVAKILIAN, 2012:17 + +, fig. 7b. (Material não examinado). + + + +Localidade-tipo: +Colômbia +, Província Darién. + + + + +(SMTD). Distribuição: +Colômbia +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/A7/04/16/A7041623F92BC678B2F9E18391C6F8C9.xml b/data/A7/04/16/A7041623F92BC678B2F9E18391C6F8C9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ad7c1eb8395 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/A7/04/16/A7041623F92BC678B2F9E18391C6F8C9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,352 @@ + + + +Taxonomy, morphology, and new distribution data of Menenotus (Coreidae, Coreinae, Spartocerini) + + + +Author + +Silveira, Diego D. + + + +Author + +Costa, Wanessa da S. + + + +Author + +Barcellos, Aline + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2021 + +e 2021029 + + +2021-12-08 + + +111 + + +1 +9 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2021029 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2021029 +1678-4766 +13266090 + + + + + + + +Menenotus diminutus +Walker, 1871 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 3, 4 +, +9–12 +, +15, 16 +, +19–21 +, +24 +) + + + + + + + +Menenotus diminutus +WALKER, 1871:7 + + +. + +LETHIERRY & SEVERIN, 1894:54 + +; + +DISTANT, 1901:430 + +; + +PACKAUSKAS, 2010:192 + +; + +COSTA +et al +., 2020 + +: fig. 22, 23; COREOIDEA SF +TEAM, 2020 +. + + + + + +Type material (examined by photo): +Holotype +– + +Menenotus diminutus + +♂ +( +Fig. 24 +). a) +Holotype +, b) Type, c) + +Menenotus diminutus + +– white label, d) saunders 65´13 – white label, e) Braz – white label, f) Osuna des 1982 + +Menenotus diminutus +Walker + +♂ +Holotype +, g) BMNH(E) 651853. + + +Distribution: +Brazil +( +Fig. 21 +). + +Head. Mandibular plates ventrally convergent. + + +Fig. 21. Distribution map of + +Menenotus +Laporte, 1832 +species + +with the biogeographic domains according to +MORRONE (2013) +, based on literature and examined material. + + + + +Figs 22–24. Habitus of the type specimens of + +Menenotus lunatus +( +Laporte, 1832 +) + +, female (MNHN) (22) described under the name + +Menenotus unicolor +Westwood, 1842 + +male (courtesy of Oxford University Museum of Natural History, OUMNH), currently junior synonym of + +M. lunatus + +(23); + +Menenotus diminutus +Walker, 1871 + +male (BMNH) (24). Scale bars: 5.0 mm. + + +Thorax. Pronotum with truncated postero-lateral angles, not forming a semicircle and with the posterior margin sub-rectilinear. Evaporative area black or yellow, with few setae; peritreme yellowish. Costal margin of hemelytra subrectilinear. +Abdomen. Connexiva with rounded and well-defined yellowish spots along the anterolateral margin of the segment. Pygophore at rest leaving visible an area equivalent to one third of its own length of the urotergite VII, in ventral view. +Genitalia. Male. Pygophore dark yellow, with irregular red spots laterally. Dorsal rim of pygophore subquadrangular. Posterior surface of the pygophore, in lateral view, markedly projected subapically. Cuplike sclerite projected more than twice its width in lateral view of the pygophore. Parameres slender, light yellow with the apical region of the head, dark brown; head long, almost half the total length, tapered, projected in a smooth curvature to the inner side and with ventral setae. Ventral sclerotization of the phallotheca with irregular shape. Basal plate triangular, densely sclerotized, except for the inferior portion of the transverse bridge, which is less sclerotized, about half its thickness; sclerotization of the central part of the ductifer shorter than half of length of the ligamentous processes. Processes of the conjunctiva with some points of sclerotization. +Measurements (mm), male and female, respectively. Total length: 19.9–23.1 and 23.3–24.6; width, on the posterior margin of the IV abdominal segment: 10–10.6 and 12.4–12.7. Head length: 1.5–1.8 and 1.9–2.2; width: 2.1–2.3 and 2.4–2.9. Interocular space: 1.1–1.5 and 1.3. Antennomeres length I: 3.5–4.0 and 3.9–4.2; II: 3.6–4.4 and 4.0–4.5; III: 3.1–3.9 and 3.6–3.7; IV: 2.9 and -. Pronotum length: 7.0–8.1 and 7.9–8.5; width: 9.5–11.5 and 10.5–11.4. Scutellum length: 2.4–2.7 and 2.9–3.4; width: 3.1–3.3 and 3.6–4.0. + +Material examined. + +BRAZIL +, + +Rio de Janeiro +: + +Petrópolis +, +Independência +, +♂ +, + +13.III.1995 + +, +Ricardo +( +FIOC 35304 +) + +; + + +São Paulo +: + +Botucatu +, +♂ +, + +28.II.1986 + +, +Leac +( +MZSP 5165 +) + +; + + +Paraná +: + +Ortigueira +, +♀ +, + +I.1946 + +, +Ernesto +( +MHNCI +) + +; + + +Santa Catarina +: + +Gravatal +, +♀ +, + +16.I.1962 + +, +Silveira, P. A. +( +MCNZ 02958 +) + +; + +Criciúma +, +♀ +, + +21.X.2005 + +, +Miranda, A. +( +UFRGS 1297 +) + +; + + +Rio Grande do Sul +: + +Torres +, +♂ +, + +3.X.1985 + +, +Fleck, F. K. +col. ( +MCNZ 48837 +) + +; + +♀ +, + +12.I.2005 + +, +L. Moura +& I. +Heydrich +( +MCNZ 177360 +) + +; + +Maquiné +, +♂ +, + +20.VII.2006 + +, +A. Barcellos +( +MCNZ +) + +. + + +Comments. + +Menenotus diminutus + +can be distinguished from + +M. lunatus + +by the posterior margin of the pronotum sub-rectilinear near the posterolateral angles; connexivum with a well-marked yellow spot; cuplike sclerite projected more than twice its width, in lateral view of the pygophore; and paramere slender, with a smooth curvature of the head. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/BD/07/B9/BD07B955FFD1FFAAB5BFFD33FEABD8B2.xml b/data/BD/07/B9/BD07B955FFD1FFAAB5BFFD33FEABD8B2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8e31a3ccc8e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/BD/07/B9/BD07B955FFD1FFAAB5BFFD33FEABD8B2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,492 @@ + + + +Redescription of Omophoita octoguttata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and its immature stages, with notes on life history + + + +Author + +Begha, Bruno Pigotrovski + + + +Author + +Santos, Mateus Henrique + + + +Author + +Prado, Laura Rocha + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2021 + +e 2021016 + + +2021-08-13 + + +111 + + +1 +9 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2021016 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2021016 +1678-4766 + + + + + + + +Omophoita octoguttata +(Fabricius, 1775) + + + + + + + +Material examined. + +Adults: +BRAZIL +, + +Santa Catarina +: + +Nova Teutônia, +♀ +, + +IX.1936 + +, +B. Pohl +col. ( +MZSUP 25738 +); SÃo +Bento do Sul +, +♂ +, + +IV.1949 + +, +Dirings +col. ( +MZSP 25613 +); + +Paraná +: + +Ponta Grossa, +2♀ +, + +I.1939 + +, +Camargo +col. ( +MZSP 25583 +); Itaiacoca, +4♀ +, + +6.II.2018 + +, +E. Araújo +col. (LabGEv); +2♀ +, +♂ +, + +24.III.2018 + +, +E. Araújo +col. (LabGEv); + +São Paulo +: + +Barueri, +♂ +, + +30.VII.1960 + +, +K. Lenko +col. ( +MZSP 25584 +); + +Minas Gerais +: + +Pouso Alegre, +♀ +, +♂ +, + +I.1960 + +, +Pereira +& +Madeiros +col. ( +MZSP 25585 +). +Eggs +: +BRAZIL +, + +Paraná +: + +inferred adult parents collected in +Itaiacoca +, by +E. Araújo +in + +25.XI.2019 + +(LabGEv); +Ponta Grossa +, eggs reared in LabGEv, + +13.II.2020 + +, +B. P. Begha +col. (LabGEv). +Larvae +: +BRAZIL +, + +Paraná + +: inferred adult parents collected in +Itaiacoca +by +E. Araújo +in + +25.XI.2019 + +(LabGEv); larvae reared in LabGEv, + +18.XI.2019 + +, +B. P. Begha +col. (LabGEv). +Pupae +: +BRAZIL +, + +Paraná + +: inferred adult parents collected in +Itaiacoca +by +E. Araújo +in + +25.XI.2019 + +(LabGEv); larvae reared in LabGEv, + +16.XII.2019 + +, +B. P. Begha +col. (LabGEv) + +. + + +Adult +( +Figs 1–15 +). Diagnosis. Body shape oval; eight pale yellow to light brown maculae almost completely covering the elytra, being six of similar size and shape, and two much narrower, elongated at humeral region; maculae rectangular to rounded. Tegument between maculae dark-brown to black. Head black, with three pale yellow to light brown maculae: one covering most of the vertex and the antennal calli, and two covering the lateral portions of the frontoclypeal region. Ventral area of mesothorax, metathorax, and legs black and covered with short pale hairs. + + +Males: length +7.41-7.42 mm +; width +3.38-3.58 mm +. + + +Females: length 9.00- +9.91 mm +; width +4.24-4.59mm +. + + +Head ( +Figs 3, 4 +). Rounded, black. Vertex at the same level of tegument, with fine punctation. Inconspicuous supraorbital suture, smooth integument. Supraorbital pore with long and erect seta. Eight to ten setae at lateral margin of head macula, near eyes. Twelve setae scattered between antennal insertions. Gena with nearly same width as the eye, bearing several setae. Antennae black, filiform, with eleven antennomeres; scape subcylindrical, antennomere +II +shorter than +III +, antennomere III-X subeQual in length, subconical, longer than antennomere XI, which is also subcylindrical, albeit with a narrower, acute apex; antennal insertions ovoid, smaller than the diameter of the eye, interantennal space approximately same size of antennal insertions. Antennae comparatively longer in males. Frontoclypeus subtrapezoid, each side with four setae. + + +Mouthparts ( +Figs 5–9 +). Labrum ( +Fig. 5 +) with rounded distal margins, central portion emarginated, with ten long setae. Maxilla ( +Fig. 6 +) with narrow cardo in the proximal portion, with margins diverging from the center forming a much wider apex; stipe divided in basistipe and dististipe, the former larger and subtriangular, the latter elongated; galea subcylindrical and digitiform lacinia both with dense bristles at apex; maxillary palpus well developed with five palpomeres; +III +and +IV +the longest, +IV +the widest and +V +greatly reduced. Labium ( +Fig. 7 +) with membranous ligula, not well developed, reaching the base of the apical segment. Labial palpus with three segments, with short and transverse palpifer; palpomere +II +subcylindrical and slightly longer than wide; apical article narrowing to the apex. Subtrapezoid prementum. Mandibles ( +Figs 8, 9 +) nearly symmetrical, subtriangular, with curved outer margin; left mandible with five apical teeth, only three visible teeth on the outer face, +IV +and +V +teeth longer and sharper, mola absent; right mandible with five apical teeth, +IV +and +V +teeth longer and sharper, while others short and blunt. Well-developed membranous setose ventral lobe on each mandible. + + +Thorax. Pronotum transverse, width twice the length, lateral margins and angles rounded, with a long seta at each angle; anterior angles extending beyond the head insertion; hypomeral lobe inflated, laterally and ventrally distinct; disk lacking any setae or impression, light pink to orange for live specimens, pale yellow to light brown in dry preserved specimens. Prosternum with the same color as the pronotum; prosternal process relatively narrow, widening apically, rounded at apex. Scutellum black, triangular with rounded vertices; procoxal cavities open. Elytra ( +Figs 1, 2 +) black with eight pale yellow to light brown maculae, six of which larger, subrectangular with rounded vertices to rounded, and two of which are much narrower, also subrectangular with rounded vertices, located in the humeral region. Epipleura visible laterally in the humeral region. Mesosternum and metasternum black, surface densely covered with pale hairs; metasternum elongated, rectangular; outer margins of the thorax with a higher density of hairs. + + +Fore and median legs similar, with coxae subcylindrical, slender femur and tibiae; middle legs slightly longer. Surface densely covered with pale setae, pilosity on the metafemur restricted to outer margin. Metafemora thickened due to the metafemoral spring; fusiform shape. Tarsi pseudotetramerous, claws appendiculate; metatarsomere +V +enlarged, fusiform. + +Abdomen black, with five ventrites densely covered with pale hairs: ventrites I-IV subeQual in length, pygidium slightly longer than the other ventrites and rounded. + + +Figs 1–4. + +Omophoita octoguttata +(Fabricius, 1775) + +. Dorsal habitus with color pattern variations: 1, female; 2, male. Frontal view of the head: 3, variant with rectangular maculae, female; 4, variant with rounded maculae, male. + + + + +Figs 5–9. + +Omophoita octoguttata +(Fabricius, 1775) + +, mouthparts of the adult: 5, labrum, frontal view; 6, left maxilla, dorsal view (I-V, maxillary palpomeres; LCN, lacinia; GLA, galea; BST, basistipe; DST, disistipe; CRD, cardo); 7, labium, ventral view (MNT, mentum; PRM, prementum; LGL, ligula); 8, 9, mandibles, frontal view: 8, right; 9, left (I-V, mandibular teeth; MSL, membranous setose lobe). Scale bar = 500 μm. + + + +Male genitalia ( + +Figs 10 +– +12 + +). Median lobe with parallel lateral margins ( +Fig. 10 +), with base slightly wider than apex, short basal hooks ( +BHS +) appearing on the lateral margin near the end of the basal orifice ( +BOR +, +Fig. 11 +), which has a rounded or oval. Apical hood ( +APH +) with nearly parallel lateral margins, diverging to half the length of the flap and folding ventrally to form a semicylinder, straight apical margin. Lateral lobes ( +LTL +, +Fig. 12 +) slightly shorter than the projections of the middle lobe ( +MDL +) which are nearly parallel, diverging at apex. + + +Female genitalia ( +Figs 13–15 +). Membranous +bursa copulatrix +. Tignum goblet-shaped ( +Fig. 13 +), with a wide, well-sclerotized apex, with converging margins forming a thinner median portion; parallel margins of the median portion then diverging slightly to the base of tignum, less sclerotized and thinner than the apex. Spermatheca ( +Fig. 14 +) simple, with areniform and well-sclerotized receptacle ( +RCP +); spermathecal duct ( +DCT +) long, curled. Vaginal palpi elongated with sigmoid shape ( +Fig. 15 +), with a thin base, slightly wider and more sclerotized at the apex, ten setae at the apex. + + + + + +Redescription of + +Omophoita octoguttata + +( +Coleoptera +: +Chrysomelidae +) ... +Bet al. + + + + +Figs 10–12. + +Omophoita octoguttata +(Fabricius, 1775) + +, male genitalia: 10, median lobe, dorsal view; 11, aedeagus, right lateral view; 12, detail of the apical hood of the median lobe, dorsal view (APH, apical hood; BHS, basal hooks; BOR, basal orifice; LTL, lateral lobes; MDL, middle lobe). Scale = 200 µm. + + + + +Figs 13–15. + +Omophoita octoguttata +(Fabricius, 1775) + +, female genitalia: 13, tignum; 14, spermatheca; 15, vaginal palpi (RCP, receptacle; DCT, spermathecal duct). Scale = 200 μm. + + + +Eggs +( +Fig. 18 +). Egg oblong with round ends, one of extremities wider than the other, with an operculum. Fresh eggs opaQue and pale, older eggs orange. + + +Mature larvae +( +Figs 19, 20 +). Larvae eruciform, with many scoli dorsal and laterally, each scolus with two setae. Cephalic capsule black, lacking stemmata. Body reddened orange with hairs organized in punctuations at the sides, ventral area and dorsal area. Younger instars pale, smaller with slightly longer scoli, older instars larger and more reddened. In alcohol, specimens are yellow. Chaetotaxy constant through all instars, with no noticeable difference between older and younger instars; younger instars with longer setae. + + +Length +10.4-11.73 mm +; width +3.38-3.58 mm +. + + +Description. Cephalic capsule ( +Fig. 19 +) black, slightly inserted in the thorax; frons, clypeus, labrum, and mandibles black; stemmata absent. Endocarina inconspicuous. Epicranial suture inconspicuous, only the frontal sutures visible, reaching the top of the head capsule, which is partially covered by pronotum. Setae present: four dorsoepicranial (DOS); four paraocellar (POS); two posterofrontal (PFS); two externofrontal (EFS); two anterofrontal (AFS); four externoepicranial (EES).Antennae with three articles, short; antennomere I subtrapezoidal, rounded; antennomeres II and III smaller, conical; antennomere III the smallest. Clypeus lacking setae, subtrapezoid, with a median recess. Labrum horizontally oval, with four setae. Both maxillary and labial palps with four segments. + +Front legs slightly shorter than middle and hind legs. All legs with four setae at apex of the femur and four at tibia. Claws simple, curved and hook-like. +Dorsum and abdominal venter with four scoli on each body segment, each scolus with two short setae at apex. Prothorax with one spiracle visible in lateral view; a row of ten setae above the head insertion; eight distinct scoli with setae. Both meso- and metathorax with one long scolus on each side, longer than the scoli in the abdomen. Abdomen with eight pairs of spiracles; segments I-VII with two scoli on each side, close to the spiracle; segment VIII with four scoli. Pygopod present. + +Pupa +( +Figs 21–24 +). Body shape oval, exarate, adecticous, exarate, pale yellow. Tegument with sparse black setae. Found within cocoons made of dirt and saliva, buried in the soil ( +Figs 23, 24 +). Mature pupae with eyes, mandibles, metafemoral spring and claws darkened, sclerotized. + + +Average length: +7.2 mm +; average width: +3.5 mm +. + + + +Redescription of + +Omophoita octoguttata + +( +Coleoptera +: +Chrysomelidae +) ... +Bet al. + + + + +Figs 16–18. + +Omophoita octoguttata +(Fabricius, 1775) + +: 16, terrarium used for the rearing; 17, clutch of eggs buried in soil within the terrarium;18, egg. Scale = 1 mm. + + + + +Figs 19, 20. + +Omophoita octoguttata +(Fabricius, 1775) + +, mature larva: 19, head, frontal view (DOS, dorsoepicranial setae; POS, paraocellar setae; PFS, posterofrontal setae; EFS, externofrontal setae; AFS, anterofrontal setae; EES, externoepicranial setae); 20, lateral habitus. Scale bar = 1 mm. + + + +Description. Head not visible from above, bearing two setae on the eyes, two setae on the frons and two setae on the vertex. Pronotum wider at the base, bearing 16 setae, eight in the median region and eight in the lateral region; one pair of spiracles visible in lateral view. Elytral and hind wing thecae closely appressed, curved ventrally around the body. Mesonotum and metanotum with four setae.All femora with three setae at apex. Abdomen with five pairs of spiracles, visible in dorsal view ( +Fig. 21 +); abdominal segments I-VII with six setae; abdominal segment IX with two spine-like urogomphi ( +Fig. 22 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F423028C162F8C6FBF5F869.xml b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F423028C162F8C6FBF5F869.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0e84293d7cc --- /dev/null +++ b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F423028C162F8C6FBF5F869.xml @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ + + + +Crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) from southern Neotropical salt marshes: survey with DNA barcoding + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Lucas + + + +Author + +Ortega, Ileana + + + +Author + +Vieira, Rony + + + +Author + +Carrasco, Daiane + + + +Author + +Proietti, Maíra + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019013 + + +2019-03-28 + + +109 + + +1 +9 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 +1678-4766 +13265936 + + + + + + + +Gonomyia +( +Paralipophleps +) Alexander, 1947 + + + + + + +Diagnosis. Two branches of Rs strongly divergent, at least at wing margin. Cell dm present. Wing with conspicuous dark-brown pterostigmal spot. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F423028C17FF948FACCF8D7.xml b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F423028C17FF948FACCF8D7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..065993f248d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F423028C17FF948FACCF8D7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ + + + +Crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) from southern Neotropical salt marshes: survey with DNA barcoding + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Lucas + + + +Author + +Ortega, Ileana + + + +Author + +Vieira, Rony + + + +Author + +Carrasco, Daiane + + + +Author + +Proietti, Maíra + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019013 + + +2019-03-28 + + +109 + + +1 +9 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 +1678-4766 +13265936 + + + + + + + +Gonomyia +( +Neolipophleps +) Alexander, 1947 + + + + + + +Diagnosis. Two branches of Rs strongly divergent, at least at wing margin. Cell dm absent. Wing hyaline. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F423028C1C3F9ECFA06F955.xml b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F423028C1C3F9ECFA06F955.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..82b60c6c2f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F423028C1C3F9ECFA06F955.xml @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ + + + +Crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) from southern Neotropical salt marshes: survey with DNA barcoding + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Lucas + + + +Author + +Ortega, Ileana + + + +Author + +Vieira, Rony + + + +Author + +Carrasco, Daiane + + + +Author + +Proietti, Maíra + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019013 + + +2019-03-28 + + +109 + + +1 +9 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 +1678-4766 +13265936 + + + + + + + +Geranomyia +Haliday, 1833 + + + + + + + +Diagnosis. Its members are characterized by both having a supernumerary crossvein at about midlength of wing cell Sc and the elongate mouthparts of the adult fly ( +Fig. 9 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F423028C1C9FAD3FBF1FA31.xml b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F423028C1C9FAD3FBF1FA31.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..55f707b0792 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F423028C1C9FAD3FBF1FA31.xml @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ + + + +Crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) from southern Neotropical salt marshes: survey with DNA barcoding + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Lucas + + + +Author + +Ortega, Ileana + + + +Author + +Vieira, Rony + + + +Author + +Carrasco, Daiane + + + +Author + +Proietti, Maíra + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019013 + + +2019-03-28 + + +109 + + +1 +9 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 +1678-4766 +13265936 + + + + + + + +Dicranomyia +Stephens, 1829 + + + + + + + +Diagnosis. Morphology of antennae usually simple, antennae with elongated flagellomeres ( +Fig. 16 +). Wings, if well developed, with relatively short Sc vein, usually ending approximate to the base of Rs or before mid-length of Rs, never reaching the fork of Rs. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F433029C193F9DFFACAF8F7.xml b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F433029C193F9DFFACAF8F7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f6fbed38d76 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F433029C193F9DFFACAF8F7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ + + + +Crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) from southern Neotropical salt marshes: survey with DNA barcoding + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Lucas + + + +Author + +Ortega, Ileana + + + +Author + +Vieira, Rony + + + +Author + +Carrasco, Daiane + + + +Author + +Proietti, Maíra + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019013 + + +2019-03-28 + + +109 + + +1 +9 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 +1678-4766 +13265936 + + + + + + + +Polymera inornata +Alexander, 1913 + + + + + + + +Diagnosis. Antennal segments bi-nodose, lighter at the base and apex of each segment, but not producing an annulated effect as in + +P. obscura + +. Differs from other species in the extreme recession of the cross-vein +r +( +i.e. +, +r +equidistant between tip of Sc2 and tip of R +1 +). + + +Previous geographical distribution: +Guyana +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F433029C302F8CBFAABF9E2.xml b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F433029C302F8CBFAABF9E2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fb015415034 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F433029C302F8CBFAABF9E2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ + + + +Crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) from southern Neotropical salt marshes: survey with DNA barcoding + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Lucas + + + +Author + +Ortega, Ileana + + + +Author + +Vieira, Rony + + + +Author + +Carrasco, Daiane + + + +Author + +Proietti, Maíra + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019013 + + +2019-03-28 + + +109 + + +1 +9 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 +1678-4766 +13265936 + + + + + + + +Polymera obscura +Macquart, 1838 + + + + + + +Diagnosis. Antennal segments bi-nodose, darker on the nodes, lighter at the constriction. Wings gray with indistinct rounded clouds at the origin of Rs. + +Previous geographical distribution: +Argentina +, + + +Bolivia +, +Brazil +, +Guyana +, +Mexico +, +Panama +, +Peru +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F433029C33DF98BFE07F8D4.xml b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F433029C33DF98BFE07F8D4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5d3c2bfd450 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F433029C33DF98BFE07F8D4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ + + + +Crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) from southern Neotropical salt marshes: survey with DNA barcoding + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Lucas + + + +Author + +Ortega, Ileana + + + +Author + +Vieira, Rony + + + +Author + +Carrasco, Daiane + + + +Author + +Proietti, Maíra + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019013 + + +2019-03-28 + + +109 + + +1 +9 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 +1678-4766 +13265936 + + + + + + + +Polymera +Wiedemann, 1821 + + + + + + +Diagnosis. Males with extremely elongated antennae, at least as long as body, and usually clothed with long, delicate, outstretched hairs. Antennal segments elongatecylindrical or bi-nodose. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F433029C34BFA0AFD53F994.xml b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F433029C34BFA0AFD53F994.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f0fc4aa4f2a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F433029C34BFA0AFD53F994.xml @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ + + + +Crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) from southern Neotropical salt marshes: survey with DNA barcoding + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Lucas + + + +Author + +Ortega, Ileana + + + +Author + +Vieira, Rony + + + +Author + +Carrasco, Daiane + + + +Author + +Proietti, Maíra + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019013 + + +2019-03-28 + + +109 + + +1 +9 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 +1678-4766 +13265936 + + + + + + + +Molophilus +Curtis, 1833 + + + + + + + +Diagnosis. Rs forking into R +2+3 +and R +4+5 +while in the other +Limoniidae +species Rs forks into R +2+3+4 +and R +5 +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F43302EC1EAF8A9FD47FC20.xml b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F43302EC1EAF8A9FD47FC20.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0c7b1cdd33c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F43302EC1EAF8A9FD47FC20.xml @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ + + + +Crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) from southern Neotropical salt marshes: survey with DNA barcoding + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Lucas + + + +Author + +Ortega, Ileana + + + +Author + +Vieira, Rony + + + +Author + +Carrasco, Daiane + + + +Author + +Proietti, Maíra + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019013 + + +2019-03-28 + + +109 + + +1 +9 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 +1678-4766 +13265936 + + + + + + + +Rhipidia +Meigen, 1818 + + + + + + + +Diagnosis. The most important and conspicuous diagnostic feature of the genus is that the male flagellomeres are bipectinate, unipectinate, or subpectinate ( +Fig. 15 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F44302EC164FB0AFAD6FA35.xml b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F44302EC164FB0AFAD6FA35.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d8e00845d3f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F44302EC164FB0AFAD6FA35.xml @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ + + + +Crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) from southern Neotropical salt marshes: survey with DNA barcoding + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Lucas + + + +Author + +Ortega, Ileana + + + +Author + +Vieira, Rony + + + +Author + +Carrasco, Daiane + + + +Author + +Proietti, Maíra + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019013 + + +2019-03-28 + + +109 + + +1 +9 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 +1678-4766 +13265936 + + + + + + + +Zelandotipula neurotrichia +( +Alexander, 1962 +) + + + + + + + +Diagnosis. Wings gray, conspicuously patterned with brown, including cord and adjacent veins. Veins beyond cord with conspicuous macrotrichia, including all veins from R +2+3 +to distal section of vein Cu +1 +. Abdomen with segments conspicuously bicolored, disk yellow and with brown margins. + + +Previous geographical distribution: +Bolivia +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F44302EC1B5FBACFB94FB13.xml b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F44302EC1B5FBACFB94FB13.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1cdd754c0c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F44302EC1B5FBACFB94FB13.xml @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ + + + +Crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) from southern Neotropical salt marshes: survey with DNA barcoding + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Lucas + + + +Author + +Ortega, Ileana + + + +Author + +Vieira, Rony + + + +Author + +Carrasco, Daiane + + + +Author + +Proietti, Maíra + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019013 + + +2019-03-28 + + +109 + + +1 +9 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 +1678-4766 +13265936 + + + + + + + +Zelandotipula +Alexander, 1922 + + + + + + +Diagnosis. Wing with cell r 3 constricted at midlength. Wing often with spot or cloud over origin of Rs, and at base of middle of cell bm. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F44302EC2A6FC1FFD4CFB25.xml b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F44302EC2A6FC1FFD4CFB25.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5a51ca38ef5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F44302EC2A6FC1FFD4CFB25.xml @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ + + + +Crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) from southern Neotropical salt marshes: survey with DNA barcoding + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Lucas + + + +Author + +Ortega, Ileana + + + +Author + +Vieira, Rony + + + +Author + +Carrasco, Daiane + + + +Author + +Proietti, Maíra + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019013 + + +2019-03-28 + + +109 + + +1 +9 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 +1678-4766 +13265936 + + + + + + + +Rhipidia domestica amazonensis +Osten Sacken, 1860 + + + + + + + +Diagnosis. Mesotonal praescutum with dark longitudinal lines with wing markings large, scanty, confined to the neighborhood of veins. Wings tinged with brown in + +R. domestica amazonensis + +compared to the hyaline wings of + +R. domestica domestica + +. + + +Previous geographical distribution: East +Brazil + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F44302EC2D2FA54FEEBF9BD.xml b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F44302EC2D2FA54FEEBF9BD.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6dc0048b7cc --- /dev/null +++ b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F44302EC2D2FA54FEEBF9BD.xml @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ + + + +Crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) from southern Neotropical salt marshes: survey with DNA barcoding + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Lucas + + + +Author + +Ortega, Ileana + + + +Author + +Vieira, Rony + + + +Author + +Carrasco, Daiane + + + +Author + +Proietti, Maíra + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019013 + + +2019-03-28 + + +109 + + +1 +9 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 +1678-4766 +13265936 + + + + + + + +Symplecta +( +Symplecta +) +cana +(Walker, 1848) + + + + + + + +Diagnosis. A +2 +“S” shaped distally. The ventral tip of the gonocoxite extended, placing the gonostyli in a subapical position. + + +Previous geographical distribution. +Canada +, +U.S.A. +, +Guatemala +, +Mexico +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F44302EC2DCF8CCFAAEFBCF.xml b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F44302EC2DCF8CCFAAEFBCF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..64a37e6fc8e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F44302EC2DCF8CCFAAEFBCF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ + + + +Crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) from southern Neotropical salt marshes: survey with DNA barcoding + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Lucas + + + +Author + +Ortega, Ileana + + + +Author + +Vieira, Rony + + + +Author + +Carrasco, Daiane + + + +Author + +Proietti, Maíra + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019013 + + +2019-03-28 + + +109 + + +1 +9 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 +1678-4766 +13265936 + + + + + + + +Symplecta +( +Trimicra +) +pilipes +(Fabricius, 1787) + + + + + + + +Diagnosis. On male, vein Rs with dense row of long hairs. Mainly larger size, unpatterned wings and hairy legs distinguish this species from others in + +Trimicra + +. + + +Previous geographical distribution. The only cosmopolitan species crane fly ( +ANDREW, 2000 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F44302EC30FFB18FE18FA58.xml b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F44302EC30FFB18FE18FA58.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8cd911d0fda --- /dev/null +++ b/data/F5/4B/87/F54B87A02F44302EC30FFB18FE18FA58.xml @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ + + + +Crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) from southern Neotropical salt marshes: survey with DNA barcoding + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Lucas + + + +Author + +Ortega, Ileana + + + +Author + +Vieira, Rony + + + +Author + +Carrasco, Daiane + + + +Author + +Proietti, Maíra + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2019 + +e 2019013 + + +2019-03-28 + + +109 + + +1 +9 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2019013 +1678-4766 +13265936 + + + + + + + +Symplecta +( +Symplecta +) Meigen, 1830 + + + + + + + +Diagnosis. Wings usually with spots and seams on cross-veins, base of Rs, tips of Sc and R +1 +, and middle and tip pf A +2 +. Supernumerary cross-vein in cell R +3 +. A +2 +more or less sinuous ( +Fig. 17 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file