diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF411531E8B88535BC4136B0.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF411531E8B88535BC4136B0.xml index 9dd6e06b975..771730ee3e2 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF411531E8B88535BC4136B0.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF411531E8B88535BC4136B0.xml @@ -1,60 +1,60 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 -Key +Key to males (in part additionally with characters concerning the corresponding females) @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ to males (in part additionally with characters concerning the corresponding fema ) evenly bent with denticle apically of mid-length (female pregenital sternite ( Fig. 34H ) with concave hind margin and triangular median notch)......................................................... - + D. salina Horváth @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ Horváth ); genital plates laterally strongly sinuate ( Fig. 33A )................................................ - + D. concors group 3 @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ group 3 ) stout, portion apically of denticle short (female pregenital sternite ( Fig. 34D ) strongly protruding caudad with very deep narrow median incision)........................................................................... - + D. medvedevi Logvinenko @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ Logvinenko ) stout, portion apically of denticle short (female genital sternite ( Fig. 34C ) abruptly narrowing in basal part, then caudad protruding as tongue-shaped lobe)....................................................... - + D. rusaevi Kusnezov @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ Kusnezov ) slenderer, portion apically of denticle long and thin (female pregenital sternite ( Fig. 34A ) shorter, hind margin ± semicircular).................................................................................................. - + D. concors Horváth @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ Horváth ) testaceous, without robust thorn-shaped spines, but ventrally with tooth-shaped spines, arranged in two rows, above all in the apical portion, basal socle very low, fused with shaft (female pregenital sternite ( Figs 34E, F ) very long with protruding rounded hind margin).................................................... - + D. homophyla group 6 @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ group 6 ) basally and medially straight, ventrally slightly concave, apicad abruptly bent dorsad; genital plates ( Fig. 39A ) with rather sharp latero-caudal angle................................. - + D. homophyla (Flor) @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ group 6 ) ventrally not concave, in its apical half evenly curved; genital plates ( Fig. 39C ) with obtuse laterocaudal angle........................................................................ - + D. caucasica Melichar @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ Melichar ) ± evenly curved with denticle near mid-length (female pregenital sternite ( Figs 20B, D ) with straight or concave hind margin, with or without slight rounded notch...................................................... - + D. paludosa group 8 @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ group 8 ) proximally with abruptly elevated ventral crest (female pregenital sternite ( Fig. 20E ) with ± straight hind margin without median notch)........................................................... - + D. iblea D’Urso @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ D’Urso 9. Aedeagus shaft ( Fig. 23B ) slender, dorsal margin almost straight, spinules present also on the apex.... - + D. paludosa Melichar @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ Melichar -. Aedeagus shaft ( Fig. 23D ) stout, dorsal margin ± curved, apex smooth and shiny........ - + D. butzele Guglielmino & Bückle @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ Guglielmino & Bückle ) slender with long thin apical portion, denticle basally of mid-length (female pregenital sternite ( Figs 19D, E ) with straight hind margin, in the middle slightly convex)...................................... - + D. marandica subgroup 11 @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ subgroup 11 11. Aedeagus ( Fig. 14A ) with ventral margin at mid-length abruptly protruding ventrad, apical portion only with few tiny spines.................................................................................. - + D. marandica Dlabola @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ Dlabola -. Aedeagus ( Fig. 14E ) with ventral margin evenly curved, not protruding ventrad in the middle, spines distinctly present until apex.................................................................................... - + D. jole @@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ Dlabola ) rounded (female pregenital sternite ( Figs 20I–L ) with ± deep caudal notch)...................................................................................................... - + D. heterophyla group 13 @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ group 13 ; ratio sutural length of fore wings/head width 0.75–0.85) (female pregenital sternite ( Fig. 20I ) with deep, acuminate or narrowly rounded notch)..................................................................... - + D. heterophyla Horváth @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ Horváth ) long (portion protruding from genital valve longer than wide) with distinct latero-apical angle, lateral margin almost straight; (female pregenital sternite ( Fig. 20K ) with distinct, acuminate notch).......................................................... - + D. kusnezovi Vilbaste @@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ Vilbaste ) short (portion protruding from genital valve about as long as wide), latero-apically rounded, lateral margin sinuate; (female pregenital sternite ( Fig. 20L ) with shallow, rounded notch........................................................................................... - + D. rikele Guglielmino & Bückle @@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ Guglielmino & Bückle ) slender, evenly curved (female pregenital sternite ( Fig. 34I ) with hind margin straight or very slightly convex in the median portion)........................................................................................ - + D. horvathi W. Wagner @@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ W. Wagner ) evenly but distinctly narrowing towards apex (female pregenital sternite ( Figs 20F, G ) with ± distinct rounded notch in the middle of hind margin)................................................................. - + D. gravis Emeljanov @@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ Emeljanov ) very narrow until basal widening (female pregenital sternite ( Fig. 20H ) with ± straight hind margin)............. - + D. lukjanovitshi Kusnezov @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ Kusnezov ) with very long and thin apical portion, central denticle at mid-length or basally of mid-length of style, in most cases directed mediad (hind margin of female pregenital sternite ( Fig. 19A ) medially straight or slightly convex)......................................................................................... - + D. stylata group 19 @@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ group 19 ) in ventral view with distinct angular latero-distal margin (female pregenital sternite ( Fig. 34L ) with distinct notch).......................................................................... - + D. lobele @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ group 19 vefele -complex at the end of this key)............. - + D. vefele @@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ group 19 ), ratio wing length from shoulder to hind margin/width of head ≤ 0.91; small species with body size ≤ 3.25 mm ......................................................................... - + D. roesle @@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ group 19 ; nymph V ( Fig. 9I ) brownish with diffuse light parts, abdomen with dark sprinkles)................. - + D. impudica Horváth @@ -695,7 +695,7 @@ Horváth ); fore wings generally with green tinge; (nymph V ( Fig. 9A ) with distinct light areas on vertex, pronotum and abdomen; lateral parts of tergites V-VI and median part of tergites VIII-IX light)................................................. - + D. stylata (Boheman) @@ -716,11 +716,11 @@ and the Peloponnese Peninsula may display somewhat higher values); ventral margi ); fore wings without green tinge; (nymph V ( Figs 9B, C ) brownish with vertex, median part of pronotum and median and lateral bands on abdomen light); (see also “Remark 1” in the paragraph concerning - + D. exilis in “Results”).............................................................. - + D. exilis Horváth @@ -743,11 +743,11 @@ Horváth , Tunisia , see above) may share a part of the characters presented in the key (guide numbers 16 and 19) as exclusive of other taxa (especially of the - + D. gravis -group or some members of the - + D. stylata -group). @@ -762,7 +762,7 @@ Horváth Preliminary remarks . Only a few characters are available for the identification of - + Doratura females. Besides several morphometric characters (body length, relative and absolute length of wings, length of tibiae, length of the protruding portion of ovipositor), the morphology of the pregenital sternite furnishes particularly helpful characters. Unfortunately, morphometric characters are quite variable, and as to the pregenital sternites, only some @@ -771,7 +771,7 @@ females. Besides several morphometric characters (body length, relative and abso species display a highly derived shape of the pregenital sternite (e.g., - + D. medvedevi , @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ display a highly derived shape of the pregenital sternite (e.g., ) with long forewings (length from shoulder to hind margin ca. 1.9 mm ; ratio wing length to width of head ca. 1.3–1.4).............. - + D. heterophyla Horváth @@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ Horváth ) with distinct lateral angles, between these angles and median notch slightly concave; ovipositor in lateral view protruding from pygofer ca. 0.53 mm ........................... - + D. kusnezovi Vilbaste @@ -880,7 +880,7 @@ Vilbaste ) from lateral angles to median notch obliquely directed medio-rostrad; ovipositor in lateral view protruding from pygofer ca. 0.43–0.48 mm ; fore wings proportionally longer: ratio wing length from shoulder to hind margin to width of head generally ˃1; fore wings normally with green tinge................... - + D. salina Horváth @@ -893,7 +893,7 @@ Horváth ) from lateral angles to median notch at most very slightly obliquely directed medio-rostrad; ovipositor in lateral view protruding from pygofer only ca. 0.29–0.38 mm ; fore wings proportionally short: ratio wing length from shoulder to hind margin to width of head generally 0.8—0.9; fore wings without green tinge................................................................................................. - + D. lobele @@ -924,7 +924,7 @@ Emeljanov 7. Pregenital sternite ( Fig. 20L ) proportionally wider (ratio width/length measured on severed flattened sternite ca. 1.9), less protruding caudad, with latero-caudal margin rounded................................. - + D. rikele Guglielmino & Bückle @@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ Guglielmino & Bückle 8. Pregenital sternite ( Fig. 20B ) with median notch shallow, sometimes indistinct, rarely completely lacking (see below, remarks)............................................................................ - + D. paludosa Melichar @@ -955,7 +955,7 @@ Melichar -. Pregenital sternite ( Fig. 20D ) with median notch distinct, ± semicircular................ - + D. butzele Guglielmino & Bückle @@ -1006,7 +1006,7 @@ Guglielmino & Bückle ), ratio wing length from shoulder to hind margin/width of head ≥ 1.03; large species with body size ca. 6 mm .............................................................................. - + D. vefele @@ -1021,7 +1021,7 @@ Guglielmino & Bückle ), ratio wing length from shoulder to hind margin/width of head ≤ 0.91; small species with body size ≤ 4.25 mm ............................................................................ - + D. roesle @@ -1046,17 +1046,17 @@ Guglielmino & Bückle , in lateral view protruding from pygofer generally 0.58–0.67 mm ; fore wings with green or blue tinge........................................................................ - + D. impudica Horváth , - + D. marandica Dlabola , - + D. jole @@ -1088,11 +1088,11 @@ Dlabola ; ratio length from shoulder to hind margin/width of fore wings ca. 1.15–1.35) (specimens from Central Italy and the Peloponnese Peninsula may display somewhat higher values); fore wings without green tinge (see also “Remark 1” in the paragraph concerning - + D. exilis in “Results”)................................................................. - + D. exilis Horváth @@ -1114,7 +1114,7 @@ Horváth 14. Slender species (width of head ca. 1.10—1.15 mm ) with rather short fore wings (ratio length from shoulder to hind margin/ width ca. 1.1—1.2), hind margin of pregenital sternite straight, never convex in its median portion; fore wings without green tinge, light specimens without markings on median and hind area of vertex, prothorax and scutellum, darker specimens with dark ± distinct marking in sagittal line on vertex and/or prothorax and scutellum, but without dark spots on lateral part of central and posterior portion of vertex; dark marking on anterior part of pregenital tergite often line-shaped........................................................................................................... - + D. iblea D‘Urso @@ -1142,7 +1142,7 @@ D‘Urso ; length of pygofer in dorsal view ca. 0.4 mm ; coloration pale without markings on the middle and posterior portion of vertex.................................................. - + D. lukjanovitshi Kusnezov @@ -1159,12 +1159,12 @@ Kusnezov ; length of pygofer in dorsal view ca. 0.3–0.35 mm ; vertex in dark specimens with distinct spots on its middle and posterior portion... - + D. stylata (Boheman) , - + D. horvathi Wagner @@ -1177,7 +1177,7 @@ Wagner 16. Pregenital sternite ( Fig. 34D ) with deep incision in the middle of its hind margin.............. - + D. medvedevi Logvinenko @@ -1193,7 +1193,7 @@ Logvinenko 17. Pregenital sternite ( Figs 34B, C ) in its basal quarter with almost parallel margins, posteriorly narrowing in a truncate triangle with slightly concave lateral margins..................................................... - + D. rusaevi Kusnezov @@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ Kusnezov 18. Pregenital sternite ( Fig. 34E ) laterally with angular transition to posterior free portion, posterior portion sub-quadrangular, at its base abruptly narrowing, then protruding posteriad with almost parallel margins, widely rounded at its apex; forewings without green tinge........................................................................ - + D. homophyla Horváth @@ -1231,7 +1231,7 @@ Horváth , ovipositor protruding from tip of pygofer in lateral view 0.53–0.67 mm ; forewings pale, straw-coloured........................................................ - + D. caucasica Melichar @@ -1244,7 +1244,7 @@ Melichar , ovipositor protruding from tip of pygofer in lateral view ca. 0.4–0.5 mm ; forewings with distinct green tinge........................................................ - + D. concors Horváth @@ -1259,7 +1259,7 @@ Horváth . The abdomen of the female syntype of - + D. paludosa as presented in diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF44154BE8B885E2BC98359D.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF44154BE8B885E2BC98359D.xml index f4fbf26e9da..8ddd67ed82a 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF44154BE8B885E2BC98359D.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF44154BE8B885E2BC98359D.xml @@ -1,61 +1,61 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura lobele sp. nov. @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ Coloration ( Figs 40C, D ). Males with the general characters described for the genus - + Doratura (see above). Hind region of vertex sometimes with one or two small spots on each side near hind margin; fuscous markings in the middle of pronotum and scutellum sometimes forming indistinct sagittal band from vertex tip to scutellum. Wings without green tinge, with whitish veins and ± hyaline cells. Abdomen light with eight longitudinal rows of ± distinct markings, central ones very close to each other, divided by noticeably light middle line, middle ones formed of small spots, lateral two rows more distinct and formed of longitudinal stripes. In light specimens abdominal markings almost lacking. Females with same pattern of coloration as males, sometimes somewhat lighter. @@ -136,41 +136,41 @@ Fifth instar of nymph ( Diagnosis. - + D. lobele combines characters in its genital morphology that make a definition of a general affinity to any other - + Doratura taxon very difficult. The species displays an aedeagus morphology ( Figs 41M, N ) with distinct affinity to the - + D. stylata group by the lack of spinules or teeth, the shape of the shaft in lateral view with slender tip ending in a hook, and above all by the wide laterally strongly protruding shield-shaped ventral base of the shaft apicad followed by a sagittal carina. However, both the style ( Fig. 41O ) with its short apical portion (in the - + D. stylata group very long and thin, often longer than the basal portion) and the deep notch on the hind margin of the female pregenital sternite ( Figs 34K, L ) (lacking in the - + D. stylata group) distinguish this taxon from all members of the - + D. stylata group. A small notch on the hind margin of the pregenital sternite is present in the females of - + D. gravis , but the styles morphology in this species is quite different. Other - + Doratura taxa with medially excavated hind margin of pregenital sternite have all a distinctly different morphology of aedeagus and/or styles. @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ Distribution ( 63 ). - + D. lobele is known so far only from the diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF451548E8B8858EBA7330C6.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF451548E8B8858EBA7330C6.xml index 3a9f6c01fa7..018f3e4d79c 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF451548E8B8858EBA7330C6.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF451548E8B8858EBA7330C6.xml @@ -1,60 +1,60 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura horvathi Wagner, 1939 @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ - + Doratura horvathi Wagner, 1939: 156 @@ -90,11 +90,11 @@ Diagnosis. The species has some characters in common with the - + D. stylata group: The vertex displays (in dark specimens) an intermediate transverse row of markings (similar to - + D. stylata ), the aedeagus ( @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ group: The vertex displays (in dark specimens) an intermediate transverse row of ) is smooth, distad narrowing with apical hook, and provided with a basal shield. The hind margin of the female pregenital sternite ( Fig. 34I ) is straight or at most slightly convex. The connective is slightly longer than in - + D. stylata , its branched portion distinctly longer than the basal one, the bifurcation rather narrow. The pygofer displays about 3–4 macrosetae in its dorso-caudal portion. The styles ( @@ -162,11 +162,11 @@ from and Basilicata , inserted in his collection as - + D. horvathi . These specimens belong to - + D . butzele @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ and . The specimens from M. Manfriana ( Calabria , Monte Pollino) could not be examined. In view of the apparently restricted distribution of - + D. horvathi in Central Europe with records only from @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ in Central Europe with records only from and Slovakia , the presence of - + D. horvathi in southern diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF481547E8B88445BA173076.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF481547E8B88445BA173076.xml index 459dcbce19c..a063ca3dfe7 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF481547E8B88445BA173076.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF481547E8B88445BA173076.xml @@ -1,60 +1,60 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura salina Horváth, 1903 @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Horváth, 1903 - + Doratura salina Horváth, 1903b: 457 @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ Horváth, 1903 - + Doratura ( Doraturina @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ Horváth, 1903 Diagnosis. The species is in most characters, including the shape of styles, connective, genital plates, and female pregenital sternite, ± similar to the species of the - + D. paludosa group. It displays, however, a very particular aedeagus shape ( @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ and ( Dlabola, 1964 ) should be confirmed as it is based only on a single female which could belong to - + D. butzele . The records for diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF4D1542E8B882A5BA4A3076.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF4D1542E8B882A5BA4A3076.xml index 78acf47be63..d0c6a9467ac 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF4D1542E8B882A5BA4A3076.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF4D1542E8B882A5BA4A3076.xml @@ -1,60 +1,60 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura homophyla ( @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ Sahlberg, J., 1868: 215 - + Doratura homophyla Sahlberg, J., 1871: 293 @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ Sahlberg, J., 1871: 293 - + Doratura homophyla var. littoralis Kuntze, 1937: 311 @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ Sahlberg, J., 1871: 293 - + Doratura littoralis Wagner, 1941: 61 @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ Sahlberg, J., 1871: 293 - + Doratura ( Doraturina @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ Sahlberg, J., 1871: 293 ) displays about four macrosetae dorso-caudally. The hind margin of the female pregenital sternite ( Fig. 34E ) is lobeshaped protruding. In most characters, the species resembles - + D. caucasica Melichar, 1913 @@ -356,16 +356,16 @@ refers to Cobelli’s old record (1904), which needs confirmation. We found only (from Tuscany ) in the Servadei collection with a label “ - + D. homophyla ”, which, however, proved to be - + Doratura paludosa Horváth. The presence of - + D. homophyla in @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ records for the species a bivoltine life cycle with adults from May to October.A Taxonomic remarks. - + D. littoralis Kuntze @@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ forma littoralis of - + D. homophyla ) from dunes on the coast of the Baltic Sea in @@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ of (Mecklenburg). The author indicates larger size (body length of females 6 mm ), light coloration with largely obliterated markings, slight differences in the aedeagus shape, and a styles morphology near to - + D. impudica as diagnostic characters. He suggests @@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ as host plant and considers the species halophilous. FIGURE 35. - + Doratura homophyla (Flor) @@ -454,13 +454,13 @@ as host plant and considers the species halophilous. of this taxon from Bellinchen (now Bielinek in Poland ), i. e. a locality quite distant from the coast. In 1968, Dworakowska dedicates a paragraph in her study on the - + Doratura taxa in Poland to - + D. littoralis . Unfortunately, she had only @@ -468,21 +468,21 @@ to and one female specimen available for a comparison with - + D. homophyla . She indicates 5.67 mm as body length of the female. All in all, she confirms the diagnostic characters indicated by Kuntze. She mentions the large size, different proportion of the length of eighth and ninth abdominal tergite, the light coloration, the differences in the bending of the aedeagus, the lateral direction of its apical teeth, and the slenderer and longer styles with curved apex. Nevertheless, the style of - + D. littoralis figured in the same article, displays clearly more affinity to - + D. homophyla than to - + D. impudica . Besides the records for @@ -506,17 +506,17 @@ Söderman FIGURE 36. - + Doratura homophyla (Flor) . A–D: Germany, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Wismar, Insel Poel, as - + D. littoralis Kuntze , 12.07.2014. A: female; B: female (other specimen); C: male; D: male. (other specimen); E: female. Germany, Holstein, Hohwacht, 22.07.1932, as - + Doratura littoralis Ktz., W. Wagner @@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ We studied of Wagner’s material from Holstein (Hohwacht; Fig. 36E ) and ten - + Doratura specimens ( @@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ specimens ( and five females ) collected by H. Nickel (together with - + D. impudica specimens) on the island of Poel in Mecklenburg ( @@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ specimens) on the island of Poel in Mecklenburg ( ) not far from the type locality of - + D. littoralis . The characters of their genital apparatus ( @@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ locality of , 38A ) display no significant differences to the corresponding structures in - + D. homophyla specimens from Southern @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ specimens from Southern and Hungary . The coloration is generally light, but a similar light coloration may be observed among - + D. homophyla specimens from several countries too (e.g. in some specimens from saline localities in @@ -573,11 +573,11 @@ specimens from several countries too (e.g. in some specimens from saline localit (the two females deposited in the Wagner collection as - + D. littoralis have a body length of about 5.0 mm; - + D. homophyla females in our material range between 4.0 and @@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ females in our material range between 4.0 and , mean value 4.55 mm ). On average, the specimens from the Baltic Sea are somewhat larger than the measured - + D. homophyla specimens from other regions (width of vertex, lengths of wings, length of tibia III). Thus, differences between both groups do not concern the genital morphology, but merely (and only to a low degree, and not in all cases) size and coloration. In some cases, we observed light coloration particularly at localities on the coast also in species of other genera, for instance in @@ -593,11 +593,11 @@ specimens from other regions (width of vertex, lengths of wings, length of tibia (L., 1758) or Psammotettix confinis (Dahlbom, 1850). Considering all this, we establish the synonymy of - + D. littoralis with - + D. homophyla . diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF4E1544E8B88453BB39309E.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF4E1544E8B88453BB39309E.xml index 593f2570900..260ef0a3751 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF4E1544E8B88453BB39309E.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF4E1544E8B88453BB39309E.xml @@ -1,60 +1,60 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura caucasica Melichar, 1913 @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ - + Doratura caucasica Melichar, 1913: 329 @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ - + Doratura arenicola Logvinenko, 1975: 462 @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ Diagnosis. This species is very closely related to - + D. homophyla from which it is distinguished by a somewhat different aedeagus shape ( @@ -120,26 +120,26 @@ from which it is distinguished by a somewhat different aedeagus shape ( FIGURE 38. - + Doratura homophyla group. Right style, dorsal view. A–D: - + D. homophyla (Flor) -. A: Germany, Mecklenburg- Vorpommern, Insel Poel; B: Germany, Baden-Württemberg, Baden-Baden, Sandweier; C: Spain, Andalusia, Jaén, Cazorla; D: Irak, Bagdad.—E–G: - +. A: Germany, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Insel Poel; B: Germany, Baden-Württemberg, Baden-Baden, Sandweier; C: Spain, Andalusia, Jaén, Cazorla; D: Irak, Bagdad.—E–G: + D. caucasica Melichar. E : paratype - + D. arenicola Logvinenko. Azerbajan, Lenkoran, Talysh , 12.07.1970; F: paratype (?) - + D. arenicola Logvinenko. Azerbajan, Lenkoran, Alekseevka @@ -150,27 +150,27 @@ Logvinenko. Azerbajan, Lenkoran, Alekseevka Remarks. The original description of - + D. caucasica is based on a single female, which the author figures only in dorsal view. Kusnezov (1928b) places the species near - + D. rusaevi . Logvinenko (1975) compares - + D. arenicola with - + D. caucasica and - + D. homophyla . Figures of the genital morphology do apparently not exist. In the Moravian Museum in Brno, a male specimen is present collected in @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ and ( Tiflis ), identified by Melichar himself as - + D. caucasica , and provided with a label “Kaukasisches Museum”, apparently corresponding to a specimen mentioned in his publication from 1914 ( @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ and ; 39E, F ). Obviously, it belongs to the same species as the - + D. arenicola specimens in the Logvinenko collection in Kiew. We tried to examine the @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ and the female from Lago Lechi in northern Georgia is not sure, it is quite probable that both specimens belong to the same species. Melichar’s description of body morphology and female pregenital sternite of - + D. caucasica coincides well with this interpretation. @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ and ( Logvinenko, 1975 , as - + D. arenicola ). The presence of the species in @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ is probable but needs confirmation. Taxonomic remarks. - + D. arenicola Logvinenko, 1975 @@ -256,43 +256,43 @@ is described from Southern European and Azerbaijan . Logvinenko mentions - + D. caucasica , - + D. homophyla and - + D. littoralis as similar taxa. The only difference between - + D. caucasica and - + D. arenicola she mentioned, lies in their different size. However, in the few specimens that are left from her - + D. arenicola material, conspicuous variability in size is visible. Furthermore, Melichar’s - + D. caucasica (male) specimen from Tbilisi fits quite well with Logvinenko’s - + D. arenicola specimens, including the genital morphology. Therefore, we establish the synonymy of - + D. arenicola with - + D. caucasica . diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF50155FE8B88087BBFC3076.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF50155FE8B88087BBFC3076.xml index 0fd526024fe..7eb9b5891d8 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF50155FE8B88087BBFC3076.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF50155FE8B88087BBFC3076.xml @@ -1,60 +1,60 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura rusaevi Kusnezov, 1928 @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ Kusnezov, 1928 - + Doratura rusaevi Kusnezov, 1928b: 231 @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ Kusnezov, 1928 - + Doratura astrachanica Vilbaste, 1961: 324 @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ Kusnezov, 1928 - + Doratura ( Doraturina @@ -121,11 +121,11 @@ Kusnezov, 1928 Diagnosis . The species is closely related to - + D. concors and - + D. medvedevi , based above all on the aedeagus provided with robust black thorn-shaped spines ( @@ -137,11 +137,11 @@ and ). The equally curved and stout styles ( Figs 32C–E ) clearly resemble the corresponding structures in - + D. medvedevi . - + D. rusaevi differs from the other two taxa in males by the only slightly (not abruptly) widening aedeagus base (ventral view), in females by the long tongueshaped pregenital sternite without caudal notch. @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ differs from the other two taxa in males by the only slightly (not abruptly) wid Remarks. For - + D. rusaevi Kusnezov @@ -162,11 +162,11 @@ Kusnezov and Mitjaev (1971) . In these figures, the affinity to the aedeagus of - + D. concors is obvious. We examined specimens identified by Emeljanov as - + D. rusaevi . @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ and European Taxonomic remarks. - + D. astrachanica Vilbaste, 1961 @@ -207,26 +207,26 @@ examined and one female identified by Vilbaste himself and now deposited in the Dlabola collection in Paris. The aedeagus displays robust spines; the female pregenital sternite is strongly protruding as in - + D. concors but has a different shape. Following Vilbaste in the original description, this taxon should differ from - + D. rusaevi in its larger size and the female pregenital sternite, which in - + D. rusaevi should narrow from the base on and in - + D. astrachanica only from mid-length on. Both differences are not evident in our material (Measurements males: - + D. astrachanica : Body @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ length: ; width of fore wings: 0.88 mm . - + D. rusaevi : Body @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ length: ; width of fore wings: 0.84–0.86 mm . Measurements females: - + D. astrachanica : Body @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ length: ; width of fore wings: 1.01 mm . - + D. rusaevi : Body @@ -302,21 +302,21 @@ length: ; width of fore wings: 0.94–1.02 mm ). Note that the difference in body length between the - + D. astrachanica female and the longest - + D. rusaevi female is exclusively due to the abdomen, which is very expanded in the former specimen, strongly contracted in the latter; measurements regarding the fore body of all the measured specimens give values within a quite limited range. As to the female pregenital sternite, see Figs 34B, C . Thus, we establish the synonymy of - + D. astrachanica with - + D. rusaevi . diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF521541E8B883E9BB7D33E7.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF521541E8B883E9BB7D33E7.xml index e15c4f8677a..a7ebcda3f67 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF521541E8B883E9BB7D33E7.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF521541E8B883E9BB7D33E7.xml @@ -1,60 +1,60 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura medvedevi Logvinenko, 1961 @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ - + Doratura medvedevi Logvinenko, 1961: 238 @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ - + Doratura novobiriusiacina Dlabola, 1961: 284 @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ - + Doratura ( Doraturina @@ -117,70 +117,70 @@ FIGURE 34. - + Doratura concors group, - + D. homophyla group, - + D. salina , - + D. horvathi , - + D. lobele . Females.A–D: - + D. concors group. A: - + D. concors Horváth. Pregenital sternite. Montenegro, Nikšić, Vidrovan; B, C: - + D. rusaevi Kusnezov. Apical part of abdomen, ventral view. B: Russia, Astrachan, Sör-Kata; C: Kazakhstan, Karaganda, Zhana-Arka; D: - + D. medvedevi Logvinenko. Apical part of abdomen, ventral view.—E, F: - + D. homophyla group. E: - + D. homophyla (Flor) . Pregenital sternite. Germany, Baden-Württemberg, Baden-Baden, Sandweier; F: - + D. caucasica Melichar. Pregenital sternite. Azerbajan, Talysch, Alekseevka.—G, H: - + D. salina Horváth. G : Apical part of abdomen, ventral view. Romania, Cluj, Someşeni; H: pregenital sternite. Romania, Constanţa, Techirghiol.—I: - + D. horvathi W. Wagner. Pregenital sternite. Germany, Niedersachsen, Lengder Burg.—K, L: - + D. lobele @@ -197,11 +197,11 @@ Greece, Arcadia, Tripoli, Kandalos. K: apical part of abdomen, ventral view; L: ) and a deep incision on the prominent hind margin of the pregenital sternite ( Fig. 34D ) of the females distinguish this small species from - + D. concors and - + D. rusaevi . @@ -223,13 +223,13 @@ We examined specimens from : type of - + D. novobiriuziacina ), and Ukraine . - + D. medvedevi is recorded also from diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF541558E8B88623BEB93491.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF541558E8B88623BEB93491.xml index 537fbac1c36..7834d28cc8e 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF541558E8B88623BEB93491.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF541558E8B88623BEB93491.xml @@ -1,60 +1,60 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura kusnezovi Vilbaste, 1961 @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ - + Doratura kusnezovi Vilbaste, 1961: 326 @@ -91,12 +91,12 @@ Diagnosis. - + D. kusnezovi Vilbaste, 1961 displays an affinity to - + D. heterophyla based on a similar shape of aedeagus ( diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF54155BE8B8842EBF2736AA.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF54155BE8B8842EBF2736AA.xml index ceddeea8063..f59e8931582 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF54155BE8B8842EBF2736AA.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF54155BE8B8842EBF2736AA.xml @@ -1,60 +1,60 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura rikele Guglielmino & Bückle, 2021 @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ - + Doratura ( @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ addition to the characters provided in the original description, we give some in Coloration ( Figs 27D, E ). With the general characters described for the genus - + Doratura (see above). Vertex in dark specimens with indistinctly delimited spot in posterior half, dark markings in the middle of pronotum and scutellum forming sometimes ± continuous sagittal band from vertex tip to scutellum. Wings without metallic colour, with light veins and ± hyaline cells, in dark specimens cells somewhat fuscous with light veins. Abdomen light with eight longitudinal bands, central ones very close to each other, divided by noticeably light middle line, middle ones consisting in small transverse spots on each tergite, lateral ones irregular, often interrupted near hind border of tergites; in light specimens bands almost lacking, reduced to rows of isolated small spots. @@ -127,15 +127,15 @@ Fifth instar ( Diagnosis. - + D. rikele shares with - + D. heterophyla and - + D. kusnezovi the stout styles ( @@ -147,13 +147,13 @@ the stout styles ( ) without spinules or teeth. From both taxa it is distinguished by evenly bent and comparatively short styli (in the two other taxa long, in the basal third distinctly curved, in the apical portion almost straight), by the equal width of the aedeagus over most part of its length (distinctly tapering in its apical half in the other two taxa), by the short genital plates ( Fig. 29D ) (distinctly longer in the other taxa), and by the widely rounded (not split-shaped or narrowly rounded) notch on the hind margin of the pregenital segment in females. Furthermore, it differs from - + D. heterophyla by lower size and shorter wings ( Figs 27D, E ), from - + D. kusnezovi by the hook-shaped apex of the styles. @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ Distribution ( ). Until now, - + D. rikele was found only in a restricted area in South diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF57155AE8B88669BB31300E.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF57155AE8B88669BB31300E.xml index 9330bc8167f..e14f4ac6dd0 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF57155AE8B88669BB31300E.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF57155AE8B88669BB31300E.xml @@ -1,60 +1,60 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura concors Horváth, 1903 @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ Horváth, 1903 - + Doratura concors Horváth, 1903b: 456 @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ Horváth, 1903 - + Doratura semenovi Kusnezov, 1925: 111 @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ Horváth, 1903 - + Doratura ( Doraturina @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ Horváth, 1903 - + Doratura concors dzhungarica Mitjaev, 1971: 148 @@ -134,12 +134,12 @@ The species is characterized by evenly curved styles ( ) and the shiny black aedeagus ( Figs 31A–D ) with robust thorns on its ventral side and high socle, features that it shares with - + D. rusaevi Kusnezov, 1928 and - + D. medvedevi Logvinenko, 1961 @@ -148,11 +148,11 @@ and ) is approximately at mid-length, in the other two species not far from the apex. The female pregenital sternite ( Fig. 34A ) displays a strongly protruding, roughly semicircular hind margin without distinct median notch (tongue-shaped in - + D. rusaevi , provided with deep incision in - + D. medvedevi ). @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ Drosopoulos , 1986 , as - + D. cf. concors @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ cf. Mitjaev, 1971 , as -D. concors +D. concors dzhungarica ); diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF581554E8B88760BA303468.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF581554E8B88760BA303468.xml index 52e95cd8f7b..b3e4adcf711 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF581554E8B88760BA303468.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF581554E8B88760BA303468.xml @@ -1,60 +1,60 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura lukjanovitshi Kusnezov, 1929 @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ - + Doratura lukjanovitshi Kusnezov, 1929: 177 @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ Diagnosis. The species is closely related to - + D. gravis ; it displays similar but more slender styles ( @@ -118,11 +118,11 @@ and Remarks. Kusnezov inserted - + D. lukjanovitshi in the original description near - + D. ivanovi (= @@ -130,11 +130,11 @@ in the original description near impudica ) and - + D. stylata . The identification of - + Doratura material from @@ -142,23 +142,23 @@ material from by Dlabola (1965) as - + D. lukjanovitshi is correct. Dlabola figured the styles of this material, which resemble the styles of - + D. gravis . However, many specimens in his collection identified by himself as - + D. lukjanovitshi belong to - + D. stylata or - + D. gravis . diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF581556E8B88527BAD43580.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF581556E8B88527BAD43580.xml index 0a605bc37a8..4bc6565e88d 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF581556E8B88527BAD43580.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF581556E8B88527BAD43580.xml @@ -1,60 +1,60 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura heterophyla Horváth, 1903 @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ Horváth, 1903 - + Doratura heterophyla Horváth, 1903a: 22 @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ Horváth, 1903 - + Doratura ( Doratura @@ -124,21 +124,21 @@ This large species ( ) is long with branched part longer than basal one, branched portion basally very robust, apicad abruptly narrowing. Genital plates ( Figs 29A, B ) long, with lateral margin slightly sinuate, apex rounded, median margin of dorsal side basally with wide fold. From - + D. kusnezovi Vilbaste, 1961 and - + D. rikele Guglielmino & Bückle, 2021 , which have a robust style morphology as well, the species is distinguished by a different shape of genital plates and major body size, from - + D. kusnezovi also by the hook-shaped apex of the styles, and from - + D. rikele by a quite different aedeagus shape. The hind margin of the female pregenital sternite ( @@ -207,53 +207,53 @@ We studied material from FIGURE 26. - + Doratura gravis group. A–C: - + D. gravis Emeljanov. A , B: aedeagus, ventral and lateral view. North Korea, Pukchŏng, Hamgyŏng-Namdo; C: aedeagus, lateral view. Paratype - + D. jurtica Dlabola. Mongolia, Bajan-Agt.—D, E: - + D. lukjanovitshi Kusnezov. Aedeagus, ventral and lateral view. Syntype. Russia, Transbaikalia, Dzhida, Enchor.—F, G: - + D. gravis . Right style, dorsal view. F: North Korea, Pukchŏng, Hamgyŏng-Namdo; G: paratype - + D. jurtica Dlabola. Mongolia, Bajan-Agt.—H: - + D. lukjanovitshi . Right style, dorsal view. Syntype. Russia, Transbaikalia, Dzhida, Enchor.—I–L: - + D. gravis . I, K: right genital plate, ventral view. I: North Korea, Pukchŏng, Hamgyŏng-Namdo; K: paratype - + D. jurtica Dlabola. Mongolia, Bajan-Agt. L: left genital plate, dorsal view. Paratype - + D. jurtica Dlabola. Mongolia, Bajan-Agt.—M: - + D. lukjanovitshi . Right genital plate, ventral view. Syntype. Russia, Transbaikalia, Dzhida, Enchor. @@ -262,21 +262,21 @@ Mongolia, Bajan-Agt.—M: FIGURE 27. - + Doratura heterophyla group. A, B: - + D. heterophyla Horváth. Bulgaria, Strouma valley, Kozhuh Hill, Rupite, 100 m, 01.07.2012. A: female; B: male.—C: - + D. kusnezovi Vilbaste. Male. Kazakhstan, Karagand, 10.06.1961.—D, E: - + D. rikele Guglielmino & Bückle. @@ -291,20 +291,20 @@ in only from Calabria . We studied all the specimens in his collection assigned to this species. They are collected at three localities in a small area in the low parts of the eastern Sila mountains not far from the coast, and at one locality in the Monte Pollino region (M. Manfriana). This material does not belong to - + D. heterophyla but to - + D. rikele (Sila mountains) and - + D. butzele (M. Manfriana) , respectively. As no specimens in the Servadei collection belong to - + D. heterophyla , this species should be deleted from the list of @@ -320,7 +320,6 @@ in Ecology. - The species apparently prefers dry lowland sites on the Balkan Peninsula. In Bulgaria @@ -337,9 +336,7 @@ are at 1000 and 1100 m -, respectively - -. +, respectively. Phenology. diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF591555E8B882EDBA8F3640.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF591555E8B882EDBA8F3640.xml index f2b8f7aadd1..08c1a058a68 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF591555E8B882EDBA8F3640.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF591555E8B882EDBA8F3640.xml @@ -1,60 +1,60 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura iblea D’Urso, 1983 @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ - + Doratura iblea D‘Urso, 1983: 31 @@ -92,21 +92,21 @@ Diagnosis. Based on the shape of styles, genital plates, pygofer, and the presence of spinules on its aedeagus the species seems closely related to - + D . butzele and, above all, to - + D. paludosa . With the latter species it shares the spinules distributed also on the aedeagus tip, and the shape of the apical part of aedeagus. From both - + D. butzele and - + D. paludosa it is distinguished by the abruptly elevated ventral crest in its proximal half, and by the absence of spinules in the dorsal region of its lateral surface ( @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ at the beginning of June, and it is known until now only from this locality in s Remarks. We studied some - + Doratura specimens ( @@ -142,23 +142,23 @@ specimens ( ) collected by Vera D’Urso near Cesarò in the Nebrodi mountains (Northern Sicily ) the position of which is unclear. On the basis of their aedeagus they have to be placed close to - + D. paludosa , but the crest is developed to a variable degree, with some affinity to the aedeagus morphology of - + D. iblea . The pregenital sternite of the female is very similar to the one of - + D. paludosa ; the median notch on its hind margin, generally just indistinct in that species, seems completely lost (as in - + D. iblea ). Further - + Doratura material from other regions of diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF591555E8B887FCBB2E3539.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF591555E8B887FCBB2E3539.xml index 8b5856c8890..d09200b8265 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF591555E8B887FCBB2E3539.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF591555E8B887FCBB2E3539.xml @@ -1,60 +1,60 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura gravis Emeljanov, 1966 @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ - + Doratura gravis Emeljanov, 1966: 110 @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ - + Doratura dahurica Dworakowska, 1967: 159 @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ - + Doratura jurtica Dlabola, 1967: 25 @@ -109,8 +109,8 @@ - - + + Doratura ( Doratura @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ Diagnosis. The species is similar in particular to - + D. lukjanovitshi in respect of style ( @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ in respect of style ( ) morphology. From the latter species it is distinguished by the less slender aedeagus and the female pregenital sternite ( Figs 20F, G ), which displays a small notch on its hind margin. It resembles in its aedeagus also - + D. stylata , but lacks its basal shield, and displays rather evenly curved styles. The connective ( @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ Distribution ( Fig. 59 ). - + D. gravis Emeljanov @@ -196,25 +196,25 @@ Territory). In addition, there are records from are on average more slender and smaller than specimens from the Maritime Territory. Material from Mongolia was described and measured in detail by Dworakowska in her description of - + D. dahurica , only one year after Emeljanov’s description of - + D. gravis , and in the same year when Dlabola described - + D. jurtica . Unfortunately, in the type series of - + D. jurtica specimens of other - + Doratura taxa are also included. diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF5D1555E8B8871DBA5A332E.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF5D1555E8B8871DBA5A332E.xml index 0c8e0562391..627ad48f4b2 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF5D1555E8B8871DBA5A332E.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF5D1555E8B8871DBA5A332E.xml @@ -1,60 +1,60 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura butzele Guglielmino & Bückle, 2021 @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ - + Doratura ( Doratura @@ -108,52 +108,52 @@ . In the MZUR (Rome) two specimens of - + Doratura are deposited, which were identified as - + Doratura paludosa Melichar by Wagner and present an aedeagus distinctly different from the aedeagus of the syntypes of - + D. paludosa in the Moravian Museum of Brno. In all other characters they are identical or at least very similar to these syntypes . Specimens with the same aedeagus shape are also in the Servadei collection, partly identified by Dlabola as - + D. paludosa as well. Apparently, both Wagner and Dlabola had noticed that in Italy two similar species are present and interpreted one of them correctly as - + D. veneta Dlabola , based on the figures in Dlabola’s description, the other one erroneously as - + D. paludosa Melichar without being acquainted with the genital morphology of the type series of the latter. In this unclear taxonomic situation, other authors used later both names for the two species without a coherent species discrimination. With - + D. veneta being synonymous to - + D. paludosa (see above), the second taxon, hitherto often interpreted as - + D. paludosa , recently has been described as - + D. butzele ( Guglielmino & Bückle, 2021 @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ being synonymous to Coloration ( Figs 22A–G ). Pattern of markings as in - + D. paludosa with the same high degree of variability from light specimens (with very reduced dark markings: only three small spots on anterior border of vertex and thin transverse lines on face, black bands on abdomen disintegrated in rows of spots, small markings on male and female genital segment, thin stripes on legs and only inner areas of basal abdominal sternites dark) to very dark ones (with almost completely black face, complete dark band from vertex to scutellum, ± fuscous cells of fore wings, wide dark stripes on abdomen and almost completely black ventral side). @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ with the same high degree of variability from light specimens (with very reduced FIGURE 22. - + Doratura butzele Guglielmino & Bückle. A @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ Male genitalia. Connective ( Fifth instar ( Fig. 21F ). As in - + D. paludosa , with the same degree of variability. @@ -204,48 +204,48 @@ Fifth instar ( Diagnosis. - + D. butzele displays a close affinity to - + D. paludosa and -D. iblea +D. iblea . It shares with these species the aedeagus provided with small spinules on a great part of its surface and the stout evenly bent styles. The main difference to both species consists in the morphology of the aedeagus. In - + D. butzele ( Figs 23D–F ) it is stouter (in lateral view), with rather evenly curved ventral margin and proximally curved dorsal margin. Spinules are present only in the central portion, with the apical sector remaining smooth and shiny. In - + D. paludosa the aedeagus ( Figs 23A–C ) is slender in lateral view, widened only in its central portion, the ventral margin is strongly curved in the middle, the dorsal margin proximally straight, curved in its distal portion. Spinules are present on the entire surface including the apical part, a short proximal sector only remains free of them. - + D. iblea displays an aedeagus with abruptly elevated ventral crest, spinules are present up to the apex. In - + D. butzele , the pregenital sternite of the female ( Figs 20C, D ) has generally a distinct small semicircular notch. In - + D. paludosa ( Figs 20A, B ) this notch is usually shallow and rather indistinct. Sometimes it may be completely lacking, a condition that is observed also in - + D. iblea . @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ Distribution ( Fig. 58 ). - + D. butzele is known in @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ and , and Albania . (Among a series of - + D. stylata specimens from @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ specimens from , was one specimen of - + D. butzele ; the presence of the species in that country should be confirmed). Recently, the species was collected in Lower Austria, in a ground squirrel enclosure (possibly introduced). @@ -313,31 +313,31 @@ of FIGURE 23. - + Doratura paludosa group. Aedeagus. A–C: - + D. paludosa Melichar. A : holotype - + Doratura veneta Dlabola. Italy, Veneto, Laguna Veneta; B, C: syntype. Italy, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Monfalcone.—D–F: - + D. butzele Guglielmino & Bückle. D , E: paratype. Italy, Apulia, Foggia, Gargano; F: Herzegovina, Trebinje.—G: - + D. iblea D’Urso. Paratype. Italy, Sicily, Siracusa, Buccheri.—H–L: - + D. cf. paludosa @@ -351,46 +351,46 @@ specimen). (A, B, D, F, G, I–L lateral view; C, E, H ventral view). FIGURE 24. - + Doratura paludosa group. A–H: right style, dorsal view. A–C: - + D. paludosa Melichar. A : Italy, Latium, Roma, Manziana; B: syntype. Italy, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Monfalcone; C: holotype - + Doratura veneta Dlabola. Italy, Veneto, Laguna Veneta. D–G: - + D. butzele Guglielmino & Bückle. D : paratype. Italy, Apulia, Foggia, Gargano; E: Herzegovina, Trebinje; F: Italy, Veneto, Lago di Garda; G: Italy, Sicily, Etna, Citelli. H: - + D. iblea D’Urso. Paratype. Italy, Sicily, Siracusa, Buccheri. I–M: right genital plate, ventral view. I, K: - + D. paludosa Melichar. I : syntype. Italy, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Monfalcone; K: holotype - + Doratura veneta Dlabola. Italy, Veneto, Laguna Veneta. L, M: - + D. butzele Guglielmino & Bückle. L : paratype. Italy, Apulia, Foggia, Gargano; M: Herzegovina, Trebinje.—N: left genital plate, dorsal view. - + D. butzele Guglielmino & Bückle. @@ -400,7 +400,6 @@ Italy, Sicily, Etna, Citelli. Ecology. - The species was collected in Northern @@ -444,9 +443,7 @@ are at ( M -. Etna). The species occurs in dry or moderately moist habitats (borders of lowland riverbeds, grasslands near the seashore, ruderal places), in the southern regions also on mountain pastures or clearings of open forests - -. +. Etna). The species occurs in dry or moderately moist habitats (borders of lowland riverbeds, grasslands near the seashore, ruderal places), in the southern regions also on mountain pastures or clearings of open forests. Phenology. diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF601551E8B88185BC42367E.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF601551E8B88185BC42367E.xml index bf8cd8ec09f..2f25a5cebb2 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF601551E8B88185BC42367E.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF601551E8B88185BC42367E.xml @@ -1,60 +1,60 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura paludosa Melichar, 1897 @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ - + Doratura paludosa Melichar, 1897: 70 @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ - + Doratura veneta Dlabola, 1959: 154 @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ material ( , two females ) of - + D. paludosa , deposited at the @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ material ( Coloration ( Figs 21A, B ). Males with the general characters described for the genus - + Doratura (see above). Dark specimens with indistinctly delimited spot in posterior half of vertex, dark markings in the middle of pronotum and scutellum often forming ± continuous sagittal band from vertex tip to scutellum. Wings without green metallic shine, with light veins and ± hyaline cells, in dark specimens cells partly or completely fuscous. Abdomen light with eight longitudinal bands, central ones very close to each other, divided by noticeably light middle line, middle bands consisting of small transverse spots on each tergite, lateral ones irregular, often interrupted near hind border of tergites; in light specimens bands almost lacking, reduced to rows of isolated small spots. Females with same pattern of coloration as males, but generally distinctly lighter, often with largely reduced markings. @@ -189,66 +189,66 @@ Female genitalia. Pregenital sternite ( FIGURE 20. - + Doratura paludosa group, - + D. gravis group, - + D. heterophyla group. Female. A–E: - + D. paludosa group. A, B: - + D. paludosa Melichar. A : apical part of abdomen, ventral view. Syntype. Italy, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Monfalcone; B: pregenital sternite. Italy, Latium, Roma, Manziana. C, D: - + D. butzele Guglielmino & Bückle. C : apical part of abdomen, ventral view. Paratype. Italy, Apulia, Foggia, Gargano; D: pregenital sternite. Paratype. Italy, Apulia, Foggia, Gargano. E: - + D. iblea D’Urso. Pregenital sternite. Paratype. Italy, Sicily, Siracusa, Buccheri.—F–H: - + D. gravis group. F, G: - + D. gravis Emeljanov. Pregenital sternite. F: Mongolia, Ara-Changaj-district, Ugij Nur; G: Russia, Primorskij Territory, Platonovka. H: - + D. lukjanovitshi Kusnezov. Pregenital sternite. Mongolia, Bajanchongor, Bogdo.—I–L: - + D. heterophyla group. I: - + D. heterophyla Horváth. Pregenital sternite. Bulgaria, North Black Sea Coast, Chernevo; K: - + D. kusnezovi Vilbaste. Apical part of abdomen, ventral view. Russia, Astrachan, Ulan Chol; L: - + D. rikele Guglielmino & Bückle. Pregenital @@ -258,26 +258,26 @@ sternite. Paratype. Italy, Calabria, Crotone, Caccuri. FIGURE 21. - + Doratura paludosa group. A, B: - + D. paludosa Melichar. A : male. Italy, Latium, Viterbo, Bullicame, 293 m, 04.09.2019; B: female. Italy, Latium (Roma), Macchia di Manziana, ~300 m, 27.06.2010.—C: - + D. iblea D’Urso. Male. Paratype. Italy, Sicily, Buccheri, 800 m, 03.06.1977.—D, E: - + D. paludosa Melichar. Nymph. D : Italy, Latium, Viterbo, Bullicame, 293 m, 04.09.2019; E: Italy, Latium, Monti Ernici, 920 m, 07.08.2012.—F: - + D. butzele Guglielmino & Bückle. Nymph. @@ -294,15 +294,15 @@ Fifth instar ( Diagnosis. The species is closely related to - + D. butzele and - + D. iblea , based on a similar shape of styles, aedeagus and female genital sternite. Main differences to the other two species lay above all in the aedeagus morphology (shape of ventral margin, presence of spinules on the apical portion), and in the presence and/or shape of the median notch on the hind margin of the female pregenital sternite (see below in the diagnosis of - + D. butzele ). @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ The record for specimens from Odessa (MNHN)EH 23448, corrected by Dlabola himself to - + D. salina Horváth, 1903 @@ -360,13 +360,13 @@ for (Novi), probably refer to Croatia and to - + D. butzele ; equally, his records for Dalmatia (Arbe) and Herzegovina (Trebinje) should be referred to - + D. butzele , and his records for southern @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ and to concern localities nowadays parts of Italy (they refer probably to - + D. paludosa ). The records for @@ -382,13 +382,13 @@ concern localities nowadays parts of in Radović & Pešić (2014) as - + D. cf. paludosa refer to - + D. butzele . The record by @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ for (Cepichsee [a nowadays dry former lake in Istria ]) refer in the first case probably, in the second case surely (we examined specimens from the Melichar collection) to - + D. butzele . Records for @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ for ( Nast, 1972 ) need confirmation ( - + D. butzele ?). All the specimens we checked from @@ -420,11 +420,11 @@ for , and Montenegro (coll. Melichar, Dlabola, Remane, Lauterer, Bückle) belong to - + D. butzele and not to - + D. paludosa . @@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ were found between sea level and ca. , meanwhile the collection sites in Sardinia , where - + D. paludosa apparently represents the only @@ -463,16 +463,16 @@ Adults were collected from the end of May until the beginning of September; the Taxonomic remark 1. In his description of - + D. paludosa , Melichar distinguished this species from - + D. stylata and - + D. homophyla by its minor body size, stouter body shape, longer vertex, different shape of genital segment and different ecology (preference of moist localities). Except for the shape of the genital segment these characters are not suitable for defining diagnostic characters of these three @@ -481,23 +481,23 @@ by its minor body size, stouter body shape, longer vertex, different shape of ge species , and indeed all other - + Doratura specimens of the Melichar collection in Brno identified by Melichar himself as - + D. paludosa proved to be other species ( - + D. stylata , - + D. homophyla , and - + D. butzele ). @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ proved to be other species ( Taxonomic remark 2. We studied the type material of - + Doratura veneta (type locality: S. Giuliano, near Venice) from the Servadei collection in Verona (male @@ -516,17 +516,17 @@ We studied the type material of one male paratype (MNHN)EH 23450). There are no significant differences to - + D. paludosa Melichar in general shape, size, coloration and genital morphology. Therefore, we establish the synonymy of - + D. veneta Dlabola, 1959 with - + D. paludosa Melichar, 1897 diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF641568E8B880D1BFAF3717.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF641568E8B880D1BFAF3717.xml index 2e2ff031dd6..556c1c9813a 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF641568E8B880D1BFAF3717.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF641568E8B880D1BFAF3717.xml @@ -1,61 +1,61 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + D. vefele complex @@ -87,13 +87,13 @@ and ( Fig. 56 ) which present ± the typical vertex shape and coloration of - + D. vefele but share not all the other characters of this taxon. Primarily in their aedeagus morphology ( Figs 17E–L ), they resemble rather - + D. stylata in so far as the basal shield is well developed and/or the ventral margin is slightly sinuate (but in all examined specimens completely smooth). In some cases (particularly in specimens from @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ and northern , respectively) have a distinctly shorter ovipositor than the (two) females in the type series of - + D. vefele ( @@ -127,13 +127,13 @@ and southern ( Beja ) displays the coloration pattern as observed in - + D. vefele ( Fig. 9L ) and - + D. stylata ( diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF64156CE8B886BEBCBC30C6.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF64156CE8B886BEBCBC30C6.xml index 566ea4ae425..4293e39315a 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF64156CE8B886BEBCBC30C6.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF64156CE8B886BEBCBC30C6.xml @@ -1,61 +1,61 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura roesle sp. nov. @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ Coloration ( Figs 7C–E ). With the general characters described for the genus - + Doratura (see above). Central and hind region of vertex at most with indistinct light brown markings, sometimes with small brown spots along hind margin; pronotum light without markings, somewhat fuscous in sagittal part. Fore wings hyaline pale without green tinge and generally without dark markings. Abdomen light with eight longitudinal rows of small markings, central ones very close to each other, divided by noticeably light middle line, middle ones formed of very small spots, lateral two rows more distinct and formed of short longitudinal stripes; in light specimens abdominal markings almost lacking. Females with same pattern of coloration as males. @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ Females: Total body length: FIGURE 16. - + Doratura vefele complex. A: male. Morocco, Fes, Sefrou, 850–1700 m, 01.09.1982; B: male. Spain, Huesca, Barbastro, 400–500 m, 12.08.1982; C: female. Spain, Huesca, Bailo, 630–730 m, 06.08.1990; D: male. Tunisia, Beja, 170–220 m, 20.09.1986; E: female. Tunisia, Beja, 170–220 m, 20.09.1986. (Photos Christoph Allgaier). @@ -146,30 +146,30 @@ Female genitalia. Pregenital sternite ( FIGURE 17. - + Doratura vefele sp. nov. , - + D. vefele complex. A–L: Aedeagus. A–D: - + D. vefele . A, B: Morocco, Marrakech, Tahanaout; C, D: Spain, Andalusia, Granada, Huescar.—E–L: - + D. vefele complex. E, F: Morocco, Fès, Sefrou; G–I: Tunisia, Beja (two different specimens); K, L: Spain, Aragón, Huesca, Bailo. (A, C, F, H, I, L lateral view; B, D, E, G, K ventral view).—M–S: right style. M, N: - + D. vefele . M: Morocco, Marrakech, Tahanaout; N: Spain, Andalusia, Granada, Huescar.—O–S: - + D. vefele complex. O, P: Morocco, Fès, Sefrou; Q, R: Tunisia, Beja (two different specimens); S: Spain, Aragón, Huesca, Bailo. (M–O, Q–S dorsal view; P median view). @@ -179,11 +179,11 @@ complex. O, P: Morocco, Fès, Sefrou; Q, R: Tunisia, Beja (two different specime Fifth instar ( Figs 9D–G ). All the nymphs collected together with adults of - + D. roesle display a coloration pattern similar to that of - + D. stylata . Some nymphs are very light, and their coloration pattern cannot easily be discerned. @@ -193,47 +193,47 @@ display a coloration pattern similar to that of Diagnosis. Based on the morphology of aedeagus and female pregenital sternite, - + D. roesle belongs to the - + D. stylata group. It differs from - + D. exilis and - + D. stylata particularly by its proportionally long vertex ( Figs 7C–E ) with ratio length to width including eyes 0.43–0.5 (in - + D. exilis and - + D. stylata 0.37–0.43) and by the not geniculate styles ( Fig. 11E ) (in - + D. exilis and - + D. stylata distinctly geniculate) with acuminate lateral apodeme, from - + D. impudica also by its distinctly smaller size ( - + D. roesle : males maximum @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ also by its distinctly smaller size ( , females maximum 4.25 mm ; - + D. impudica : males minimum ca. @@ -249,31 +249,31 @@ also by its distinctly smaller size ( , females minimum ca. 5.3 mm ). In coloration and head shape, - + D. roesle resembles to some degree - + D. vefele and specimens among the - + D. vefele complex. In regard of the style or aedeagus morphology, there is equally some affinity to some specimens belonging to the - + D. vefele complex. - + D. roesle is distinguished in respect of these specimens, however, by its smaller body size and above all by its proportionally very short fore wings with ratio length (from shoulder to hind margin) to width of head 0.8–0.91 (in specimens of - + D. vefele and the - + D. vefele complex 1.03–1.24). @@ -282,22 +282,22 @@ complex 1.03–1.24). FIGURE 18. - + Doratura vefele sp. nov. , - + D. vefele complex. Genital plate. A–C: - + D. vefele . A: Morocco, Marrakech, Tahanaout; B, C: Spain, Andalusia, Granada, Huescar.—D–G: - + D. vefele complex. D: Morocco, Fès, Sefrou; E, F: Tunisia, Beja; G. Spain, Aragón, Huesca, Bailo. (A, B, D, F: right genital plate, ventral view; C, E, G: left genital plate, dorsal view). @@ -306,49 +306,49 @@ complex. D: Morocco, Fès, Sefrou; E, F: Tunisia, Beja; G. Spain, Aragón, Huesc FIGURE 19. - + Doratura stylata group. Female pregenital sternite. A: - + D. stylata (Boheman) . Germany, Bayern, Memmingen; B: - + D. exilis Horváth. Germany, Baden-Württemberg, Gültlingen; C: - + D. impudica Horváth. Italy, Basilicata, Matera, Fiume Sinni; D: - + D. marandica Dlabola. Iran, Kandavan-Pass; E: - + D. jole sp. nov. Turkey, Tunceli, Ovacik; F: - + D. vefele sp. nov. Spain, Andalusia, Granada, Huescar; G: - + D. vefele complex. Tunisia, Beja; H: - + D. roesle diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF681566E8B88725BA8533BF.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF681566E8B88725BA8533BF.xml index 27b7e347805..ada117ba9b1 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF681566E8B88725BA8533BF.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF681566E8B88725BA8533BF.xml @@ -1,61 +1,61 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura jole sp. nov. @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ Coloration ( Figs 13C, D ). With the general characters described for the genus - + Doratura (see above). Hind region of vertex sometimes with small spot on each side near hind margin; pronotum light without markings. Fore wings hyaline pale greenish, sometimes slightly fuscous near hind margin, lateral border whitish. Abdomen light with eight longitudinal rows of ± distinct markings, central ones very close to each other, divided by noticeably light middle line, middle ones formed of small spots, lateral two rows more distinct and formed of longitudinal stripes; in light specimens abdominal markings almost lacking. @@ -136,23 +136,23 @@ Male genitalia. Aedeagus shaft in lateral view ( FIGURE 14. - + Doratura marandica Dlabola , - + D. jole sp. nov. A–D: - + D. marandica . A, B: aedeagus, lateral and ventral view. Holotype. Iran, Marand; C: right style, dorsal view. Iran, Kandavan-Pass; D: right style, dorsal view. Paratype. Iran, Marand.—E–G: - + D. jole . Turkey, Tunceli, Ovacik. E, F: aedeagus, lateral and ventral view; G. right style, dorsal view. @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ Female genitalia. Pregenital sternite ( Fifth instar. The nymphs ( Fig. 9K ) collected together with the adult specimens display similar features as nymphs of - + D. impudica but are rather light coloured with less distinct dark spots. @@ -176,14 +176,14 @@ but are rather light coloured with less distinct dark spots. Diagnosis. - + D. jole sp. nov. is closely related to - + D. marandica ( @@ -258,27 +258,25 @@ male: AS. Kment lgt.; Collectio National Museum -, -Praha -, -Czech Republic +, Praha, Czech Republic .— - + Paratypes -: Same data as holotype - -; +: Same data as holotype; 6 males , 7 females . + - + Holotype , 4 male + + and 5 female paratypes @@ -289,7 +287,9 @@ are deposited in the Czech Republic ( NMPC -), +), + + 1 male and 1 female @@ -298,7 +298,10 @@ in the Moravian Museum, Brno, Czech Republic ( MMBC -), and +), + + +and 1 male and 1 female diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF6A1568E8B8815DBB473133.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF6A1568E8B8815DBB473133.xml index 51e2f1935d1..5bc380d7eac 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF6A1568E8B8815DBB473133.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF6A1568E8B8815DBB473133.xml @@ -1,61 +1,61 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura vefele sp. nov. @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ Coloration ( Figs 15A–D ). With the general characters described for the genus - + Doratura (see above). Hind region of vertex sometimes with small spot on each side near hind margin, sagittal region sometimes fuscous or provided with double indistinct longitudinal marking; pronotum light without markings or ± fuscous with small transverse spots, two in central region and about three laterally on each side. Fore wings hyaline pale or distinctly fuscous, above all near hind margin, lateral margin whitish, veins ± distinct in the apical half. Abdomen light with eight longitudinal rows of ± distinct markings, central ones very close to each other, divided by noticeably light middle line, middle ones formed of small spots, lateral two rows more distinct and formed of longitudinal stripes; in dark specimens inner two rows fused to two continuous large dark bands. @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ Male Genitalia. Aedeagus shaft, lateral view ( ): Ventral margin of shaft nowhere sinuous, evenly convex without scabrous crest, maximum width of shaft near base; in ventral view ( Figs 17B, D ) apically of basal shield quite narrow, slightly widening towards apex with short narrowing apical portion, basal shield rather small with oblique lateral margin and indistinct lateral angles. Socle well developed, ± as in - + D. stylata . Styles ( @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ Female genitalia. Pregenital sternite ( Fifth instar ( Fig. 9L ). Coloration as in - + D. stylata , vertex distinctly longer. @@ -153,34 +153,34 @@ Fifth instar ( Diagnosis. - + D. vefele sp. nov. is related to - + D. stylata , - + D. exilis and - + D. impudica . It shares with these species the shape of styles with long and narrow apical portion, the aedeagus with shield-shaped baso-ventral widening and without thorn- or tooth-like protuberances, the general shape of the genital plates and the shape of the female pregenital sternite. It differs from - + D. exilis , - + D. stylata and - + D. impudica by proportionally shorter genital plates ( @@ -190,24 +190,24 @@ by proportionally shorter genital plates ( ) (rather short and rounded apical vertex margin in the other three species), furthermore by the apicad less tapering aedeagus (in lateral view) with small basal shield ( Figs 17A, C ). In addition, it is distinguished in respect of - + D. exilis by the conspicuously larger body size, and proportionally longer wings ( Figs 15A–D ). - + D. vefele displays some affinity to - + D. roesle sp. nov. (see below) in its aedeagus morphology, light coloration and above all in its long vertex. It is distinguished, however, in respect of this species by its larger body size and by its proportionally longer fore wings with ratio length (from shoulder to hind margin) to width of head 1.03–1.21 (in - + D. roesle 0.8–0.91). @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ and FIGURE 15. - + Doratura vefele diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF6E1565E8B886C4BAA935BF.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF6E1565E8B886C4BAA935BF.xml index 23c80b6cc86..b467edbcd3f 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF6E1565E8B886C4BAA935BF.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF6E1565E8B886C4BAA935BF.xml @@ -1,60 +1,60 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura marandica Dlabola, 1981 @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ - + Doratura marandica Dlabola, 1981: 261 @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ The species displays styles ( ), genital plates ( Figs 12K, L ) and the morphology of the female pregenital sternite (19D) very similar to - + D. impudica . It is distinguished in particular by the aedeagus contour in lateral view ( @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ The species is known only from few localities in northwestern Remarks. In the description of - + D. iblea , D’Urso (1983) @@ -132,29 +132,29 @@ In the description of suggested on the basis of the aedeagus shape in lateral view ( Fig. 23G ) some affinity of her new species to - + D. marandica . After the examination of the type material and some further specimens of - + D. marandica , however, it is clear that the ventrally strongly protruding aedeagus evolved in both species convergently, and - + D. marandica belongs not to the - + D. paludosa group but to the - + D. stylata group. In particular, it is closely related to - + D. impudica , with which it shares the size, general morphology and the shape of styles, genital plates and female pregenital sternite. @@ -163,43 +163,43 @@ group. In particular, it is closely related to FIGURE 12. - + Doratura stylata group. Genital plate. A–D: - + D. stylata (Boheman) . A, B: Germany, Bayern, Memmingen; C: Mongolia, Bulgan, (MNHN)EH 23459; D: Spain, Aragón, Huesca, Ansó.—E, F: - + D. exilis Horváth. E : Germany, Baden-Württemberg, Gültlingen; F. Italy, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Basovizza.—G: - + D. roesle sp. nov. Greece, Achaia, Kalavryta, Lousiko.—H, I: - + D. impudica Horváth. H : Bulgaria, Sofia, Beledie Han; I: syntype - + D. ivanovi Kusnezov. Ukraine, Kiev.—K, L: - + D. marandica Dlabola. K : Iran, Kandavan-Pass; L: Holotype. Iran, Marand.—M, N: - + D. jole diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF70157EE8B887DEBFC33077.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF70157EE8B887DEBFC33077.xml index d163f258532..8a59d960f22 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF70157EE8B887DEBFC33077.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF70157EE8B887DEBFC33077.xml @@ -1,60 +1,60 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura exilis Horváth, 1903 @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ Horváth, 1903 - + Doratura exilis Horváth, 1903b: 454 @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ Horváth, 1903 - + Doratura ( Doratura @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ Horváth, 1903 Small species with proportionally short fore wings without green tinge ( Figs 7A, B ), and genital morphology similar in every regard to - + D. stylata , but never with spinules on the ventral margin of the aedeagus ( @@ -124,11 +124,11 @@ Small species with proportionally short fore wings without green tinge ( ). The nymphs display two broad longitudinal dark stripes on their abdomen ( Fig. 9B ), which distinguishes this species from both - + D. impudica and - + D. stylata . @@ -321,11 +321,11 @@ to concern Remark 1. In some cases, - + D. stylata and - + D. exilis are not easily distinguishable as their morphometric characters may overlap. In populations from the Central Apennines ( @@ -335,55 +335,55 @@ are not easily distinguishable as their morphometric characters may overlap. In Peninsula ( Greece ), for example, frequently specimens occur that display measurements somewhat different in respect of the values indicated in the literature and in our key; the overlapping range with - + D. stylata becomes in these cases quite wide. Nevertheless, specimens of such populations can generally be distinguished even from small - + D. stylata specimens using some further characters (in addition to the characters used for the distinction of the two taxa in the identification keys, prevalently morphometric characters: - + D. exilis is smaller, rather slender, with proportionally short fore wings), even if none of them alone is exclusive for one species or present in each specimen. Such characters concern above all the coloration and the markings. Distinct green coloration of the fore wings is typical for - + D. stylata , lack of such coloration for - + D. exilis (no specimen in our - + D. exilis material had a green tinge on the fore wings, but - + D. stylata may lack it as well). Brown stripes on the wings, particularly along the border of the clavus are typical for - + D. exilis but may occur also in - + D. stylata . The middle row of transverse spots on the vertex is present nearly exclusively in - + D. stylata (almost never in - + D. exilis ), but may also be absent (above all in females). A brown not exactly delineated central square spot in the middle of the vertex near its hind margin, often divided in two small longitudinal stripes and a poorly defined brown sagittal band on pronotum and/or scutellum are often present in - + D. exilis (above all in males). In contrast, they are generally absent in - + D. stylata , and present only in very dark specimens (see also the drawings given in @@ -391,15 +391,15 @@ but may occur also in , and in Biedermann & Niedringhaus, 2004 ). Of course, the pattern given here for - + D. exilis can be observed in other taxa as well (for example - + D. homophyla , or in the - + D. paludosa group), but these taxa have a very different genital morphology. @@ -407,23 +407,23 @@ group), but these taxa have a very different genital morphology. FIGURE 7. - + Doratura exilis Horváth , - + D. roesle sp. nov. A, B: - + D. exilis . A: female. Germany, Baden-Württemberg, Heidenheim, Iggenhausen, 12.08.2013; B: male. Germany, Baden-Württemberg, Schwarzwald-Baar-Kreis, Mühlhausen, 15.07.2013.—C–E: - + D. roesle . C: female. Greece, Achaia, Erymanthos, Elliniko, 943 m, 31.07.2017; D: male. Greece, Achaia, Kalavryta, Lousiko, 960 m, 02.08.2017; E: male. Greece, Achaia, Erymanthos, Tsapournia, 1206 m, 31.07.2017. (Photos Christoph Allgaier). @@ -433,11 +433,11 @@ A, B: Remark 2. Servadei (1967) regarded - + D. exilis as a synonym of - + D. stylata . @@ -448,11 +448,11 @@ as a synonym of mentions that the saw-case of the ovipositor (gonoplac, 3 rd valvula) is comparatively longer in - + D. exilis than in - + D. stylata . Similarly, we found the serrated portion of the 2 @@ -460,11 +460,11 @@ than in valvula and the number of teeth ( Figs 4A, B ) in both species approximately the same though - + D. exilis is distinctly smaller than - + D. stylata . In addition, the serrated part of the 2 diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF721563E8B8811EBD7B3533.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF721563E8B8811EBD7B3533.xml index de7fb851a87..94467c73d3f 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF721563E8B8811EBD7B3533.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF721563E8B8811EBD7B3533.xml @@ -1,60 +1,60 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura impudica Horváth, 1897 @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ - + Doratura impudica Horváth, 1897: 629 @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ - + Doratura ivanovi Kusnezov, 1928a: 47 @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ - + Doratura ( Doratura @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ This large species, generally with distinct green or blue tinge in the coloration of its fore wings, is distinguished by proportionally long legs and a strongly protruding ovipositor ( Fig. 8 ). In its male genital morphology, it resembles - + D. stylata , but never shows spinules on the ventral side of the aedeagus ( @@ -139,11 +139,11 @@ This large species, generally with distinct green or blue tinge in the coloratio ). The nymphs display no particular pattern of markings ( Fig. 9I ), in contrast to both - + D. exilis and - + D. stylata . @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ and and Veneto . Some specimens in his collection were misidentified and belong to - + D. stylata . The species has never been recorded from @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ or . - + D. impudica is widely distributed in Europe and the East Palearctic region to @@ -326,11 +326,11 @@ to concern Remarks. Ribaut (1952) writes that the aedeagus of - + D. impudica , in contrast to - + D. stylata , is “dépourvu de carènes latérales à la base”, means that it lacks a shield-shaped base. @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ and Fennoscandia), displays generally a distinct basal shield (including specime Taxonomic remarks. - + D. ivanovi Kusnezov, 1928a @@ -360,31 +360,31 @@ has been recorded from Central European ( Nast, 1972 ). Until now, there were apparently no figures of this species, and the description given by the author gives no information about the genital morphology. In his description of - + D. lukjanovitshi , Kusnezov (1929) indicates the position of the new taxon near - + D. ivanovi and - + D. stylata . This was the only hint to an affinity of - + D. ivanovi to the - + D. stylata group. The examination of syntypes of - + D. ivanovi ( @@ -396,15 +396,15 @@ of ; 12I ) showed no essential differences to - + D. impudica . Therefore, we establish the synonymy of - + D. ivanovi with - + D. impudica . @@ -413,17 +413,17 @@ with FIGURE 8. - + Doratura impudica Horváth. A : female. Bulgaria, Sofia, Dragomansko blato, 720 m, 23.06.2012; B: male. Bulgaria, Vlahina Mountains, Boboshevo, 730 m, 30.06.2012; C: male. Syntype - + D. ivanovi Kusnezov. Ukraine, Kiev surroundings, Holosiivskyi forest; D: female. Syntype - + D. ivanovi Kusnezov. @@ -433,51 +433,51 @@ Ukraine, Kiev surroundings, Holosiivskyi forest. (Photos Christoph Allgaier). FIGURE 9. - + Doratura stylata group. Nymphs. A: - + D. stylata (Boheman) . Italy, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Basovizza, 432 m, 21.07.2016.—B, C: - + D. exilis Horváth. B : Greece, Thessalia, Larissa, Tempi, Kallipefki, 1120 m, 10.08.2017; C: Greece, Thessalia, Larissa, Tempi, Kallipefki, 1120 m, 10.08.2017 (other specimen).—D–G: - + D. roesle sp. nov. D: Greece, Achaia, Erymanthos, Elliniko, 943 m, 31.07.2017; E: Greece, Achaia, Kalavryta, Lousiko, 960 m, 02.08.2017; F: Greece, Achaia, Erymanthos, Tsapournia, 1206 m, 31.07.2017; G: Greece, Achaia, Kalavryta, Lousiko, 960 m, 02.08.2017.—H: - + D. stylata group?. Greece, Corinthia, Killini, Ziria, 1525 m, 04.08.2017.—I: - + D. impudica Horváth. Italy, Friuli-Venezia Giulia (Udine), Torrente But c/o Sutrio, 526 m, 05.07.2017.—K: - + D. jole sp. nov. Turkey, Tunceli prov., Ovacik.—L: - + D. vefele sp. nov. Morocco, Marrakech, Tahanaout, 1000–1050 m, 25.05.1981.—M: - + D. vefele complex. Tunisia, Beja, 170–220 m, 20.09.1986. (Photos Christoph Allgaier). @@ -486,33 +486,33 @@ complex. Tunisia, Beja, 170–220 m, 20.09.1986. (Photos Christoph Allgaier). FIGURE 10. - + Doratura stylata group. Aedeagus. A–G: - + D. stylata (Boheman) . A, B: Germany, Bayern, Memmingen; C: Italy, Basilicata, Monte Pollino; D, E: Mongolia, Bulgan, (MNHN)EH 23459; F, G: Spain, Aragón, Huesca, Ansó.—H, I: - + D. exilis Horváth. Germany, Baden-Württemberg, Gültlingen.—K, L: - + D. roesle sp. nov. Greece, Achaia, Kalavryta, Lousiko.—M–Q: - + D. impudica Horváth. M -, N: Bulgaria, Sofia, Beledie Han; O: Italy, Basilicata, Matera, Fiume Sinni; P: Germany, Mecklenburg- Vorpommern, Insel Poel; Q: syntype - +, N: Bulgaria, Sofia, Beledie Han; O: Italy, Basilicata, Matera, Fiume Sinni; P: Germany, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Insel Poel; Q: syntype + D. ivanovi Kusnezov. diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF77157CE8B886D9BF2F3636.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF77157CE8B886D9BF2F3636.xml index 585513bbbb5..ce959b1357c 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF77157CE8B886D9BF2F3636.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF77157CE8B886D9BF2F3636.xml @@ -1,60 +1,60 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura stylata ( @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ Athysanus - + stylata Boheman, 1847: 31 @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ Flor, 1861: 273 - + Doratura stylata : Sahlberg, J., 1871: 292 @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ - + Doratura stylata var. macroptera @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ var. - + Doratura ( Doratura @@ -169,21 +169,21 @@ This species has an almost completely smooth aedeagus (generally, but not always ) with branched part longer than basal portion and rounded bifurcation, and the female pregenital sternite with straight hind margin, in most cases with the median portion slightly protruding caudad ( Fig. 19A ). In all these characters, the species displays a distinct affinity to - + D. exilis and - + D. impudica . From the first species it can be distinguished by its proportionally longer fore wings and in many cases by its different coloration with fore wings with green tinge and different pattern of markings on vertex and pronotum (see below), from the latter by the proportionally shorter hind tibiae, in most cases from both species by its slightly scabrous medio-ventral margin of aedeagus. The nymphs ( Fig. 9A ) display a dark abdomen with light areas laterally on tergite V and VI (often confluent to a continuous transverse light band) and in the sagittal line of the apex (in - + D. exilis abdomen with longitudinal dark stripes, in - + D. impudica without markings) (see @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ Stöckmann FIGURE 5. - + Doratura stylata (Boheman) @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ valvula, apical portion. (Photos Christoph Allgaier). FIGURE 6. - + Doratura stylata (Boheman) @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ record the species from Alto Adige, from Lombardy . - + Doratura stylata is apparently not present in @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ and Outside of Italy , - + D. stylata has a vast distribution in most parts of the Palearctic region ( @@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ Mühlethaler Records of - + D. stylata for “North Africa” by @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ and Remarks. Ribaut (1952) indicates as a diagnostic character of - + D. stylata the “papilleuse” ventral side of the aedeagus ( @@ -521,21 +521,21 @@ observed a distinct variability in this character. Indeed, in and in Germany , - + D. stylata specimens with a completely smooth aedeagus are observed ( Fig. 10B ). We never found, however, a “papilleuse” ventral aedeagus side in - + D. exilis or - + D. impudica . Thus, among these three species, the presence of this structure of the aedeagus surface is a sufficient, but not a necessary condition for the identification of a specimen as - + D. stylata . diff --git a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF78157BE8B88501BFDD3762.xml b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF78157BE8B88501BFDD3762.xml index 4b0080a34fe..0a7adca2f5e 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF78157BE8B88501BFDD3762.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/87/039C8791BF78157BE8B88501BFDD3762.xml @@ -1,60 +1,60 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species + + + +Revision of the genus Doratura Sahlberg (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) with particular regard to its distribution in Italy and description of four new species - - -Author + + +Author -Bückle, Christoph +Bückle, Christoph - - -Author + + +Author -Guglielmino, Adalgisa -0000-0002-2541-5240 -guglielm@unitus.it +Guglielmino, Adalgisa +0000-0002-2541-5240 +guglielm@unitus.it -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2022 - -2022-03-09 + +2022 + +2022-03-09 - -5112 + +5112 - -1 + +1 - -1 -116 + +1 +116 - -http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 + +http://zoobank.org/c2750d92-315a-431f-bceb-3e20ecd03ea0 -journal article -111395 -10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 -a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c -1175-5326 -6340589 -C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 +journal article +111395 +10.11646/zootaxa.5112.1.1 +a06d0e06-3ed0-43e8-8a95-1662c2b1685c +1175-5326 +6340589 +C2750D92-315A-431F-BCEB-3E20ECD03EA0 - + Doratura J. @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ species: - + Doratura (Doraturina) @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ taxa treated in this paper. - + D. stylata @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ taxa treated in this paper. - + D. exilis @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ taxa treated in this paper. - + D. impudica @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ taxa treated in this paper. - + D. marandica @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ taxa treated in this paper. - + D. jole @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ taxa treated in this paper. - + D. vefele + complex @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ taxa treated in this paper. - + D. roesle @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ taxa treated in this paper. - + D. paludosa @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ taxa treated in this paper. - + D. butzele @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ taxa treated in this paper. - + D. iblea @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ taxa treated in this paper. - + D. gravis @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ taxa treated in this paper. - + D. lukjanovitshi @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ taxa treated in this paper. - + D. heterophyla @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ taxa treated in this paper. - + D. kusnezovi @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ taxa treated in this paper. - + D. rikele @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ taxa treated in this paper. - + D. concors @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ taxa treated in this paper. - + D. rusaevi @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ taxa treated in this paper. - + D. medvedevi @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ taxa treated in this paper. - + D. homophyla @@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ taxa treated in this paper. - + D. caucasica @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ taxa treated in this paper. - + D. salina @@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ taxa treated in this paper. - + D. horvathi @@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ taxa treated in this paper. - + D. lobele @@ -499,38 +499,38 @@ in females. FIGURE 1. Genus - + Doratura J. Sahlberg. A : genital segment, right lateral view. - + D. homophyla (Flor) , Hungary, Velence (v = ventral side of aedeagus, d = dorsal side of aedeagus); B: styles, connective, aedeagus, dorsal view (with aedeagus bent caudad). - + D. paludosa Melichar , Italy, Latium, Torre di Chia; C: connective, right lateral view. - + D. paludosa , Italy, Latium, Tarquinia; D: genital plates and genital valve, ventral view. - + D. lobele sp. nov. Greece, Tripoli, Kandalos; E: right style and genital plate, right part of genital valve, dorsal view. - + D. impudica Horváth , Bulgaria, Sofia, Beledie Han; F: base of ovipositor, ventral view. - + D. butzele Guglielmino & Bückle @@ -541,81 +541,81 @@ Guglielmino & Bückle FIGURE 2. Connective, dorsal view. A: - + Doratura stylata (Boheman) , Germany, Bayern, Memmingen; B: - + D. exilis Horváth , Slovakia, Chlaba, (MNHN)EH 23384; C: - + D. impudica Horváth , Italy, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Spilimbergo; D: - + D. marandica Dlabola , Holotype, Iran, Marand; E: - + D. jole sp. nov. , Turkey, Tunceli, Ovacik; F: - + D. vefele sp. nov. , Morocco, Marrakech, Tahanaout; G: - + D. butzele Guglielmino & Bückle , Paratype, Italy, Abruzzo, Chieti, Montemitro; H: - + D. gravis Emeljanov , Paratype - + D. jurtica Dlabola , Mongolia, Songino; I: - + D. heterophyla Horváth , Bulgaria, Strouma valley, Kozhuh Hill, Rupite; K: - + D. rikele Guglielmino & Bückle , Paratype, Italy, Calabria, Crotone, Caccuri; L: - + D. concors Horváth , Montenegro, Nikšić, Vidrovan; M: - + D. homophyla (Flor) , Spain, Andalusia, Jaén, Cazorla; N: - + D. salina Horváth , Syntype, Romania, Cluj, Sik; O: - + D. lobele , @@ -695,7 +695,7 @@ Zachvatkin, 1934 (see (see Hamilton, 1975 ) useful characters for species discrimination. However, in the genus - + Doratura this structure displays apparently only slight variations among different species and even species groups. @@ -713,19 +713,19 @@ Stöckmann , 2013 ). - + D. stylata ( Fig. 9A ), for instance, is easily distinguishable in its juvenile stage from - + D. exilis ( Fig. 9B ) and - + D. impudica ( @@ -736,32 +736,32 @@ Stöckmann FIGURE 3. Pygofer, right lateral view. A: - + Doratura stylata (Boheman) , Bulgaria, Stara Planina, Barzia; B: - + D. butzele , Guglielmino & Bückle , Italy, Molise, Campobasso, Boiano; C: - + D. heterophyla Horváth , Bulgaria, North Black Sea Coast, Chernevo; D: - + D. rikele Guglielmino & Bückle , Paratype, Italy, Calabria, Crotone, Caccuri; E: - + D. homophyla (Flor) , Hungary, Velence; F: - + D. lobele @@ -776,27 +776,27 @@ Guglielmino & Bückle Females, 2 nd valvula, apical portion. A: - + Doratura stylata (Boheman) , Bulgaria, Stara Planina, Hristo Danovo; B: - + D. exilis Horváth , Germany, Thüringen, Bottendorf; C: - + D. impudica Horváth , Bulgaria, Sofia, Beledie Han; D: - + D. butzele Guglielmino & Bückle , Italy, Molise, Campobasso, Boiano; E: - + D. heterophyla Horváth @@ -809,12 +809,12 @@ Variability of coloration in the nymphs. Among nymphs of the same species, speci ) together with others which display an almost homogeneous light yellowish coloration in which the pattern of markings is not easy to discern ( Fig. 9E ). For example, specimens of - + D. butzele Guglielmino & Bückle, 2021 and - + D. paludosa with only indistinct markings were observed in several cases. We do not know whether such pale nymphs develop later to equally pale adults, as are observed in several @@ -823,7 +823,7 @@ with only indistinct markings were observed in several cases. We do not know whe species (particularly - + D. homophyla ).