diff --git a/data/09/3D/87/093D87C4FF9DD60BFF61B26A3E0DF9B5.xml b/data/09/3D/87/093D87C4FF9DD60BFF61B26A3E0DF9B5.xml index 9cab5a1b48a..21ad6e33bf3 100644 --- a/data/09/3D/87/093D87C4FF9DD60BFF61B26A3E0DF9B5.xml +++ b/data/09/3D/87/093D87C4FF9DD60BFF61B26A3E0DF9B5.xml @@ -1,72 +1,74 @@ - - - -- Description-of-ontogenetic-changes-in-the-morphology-of-Amblyseius herbicolus (Chant, - 1959) and-Amblyseius lentiginosus Denmark- & - Schicha, - 1974 - (Acari: - Phytoseiidae) + + + +- Description-of-ontogenetic-changes-in-the-morphology-of-Amblyseius herbicolus (Chant, - 1959) and-Amblyseius lentiginosus Denmark- & - Schicha, - 1974 - (Acari: - Phytoseiidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Ma, Min -College of Plant Protection, Shanxi Agriculture University, Taigu, China. +Ma, Min +College of Plant Protection, Shanxi Agriculture University, Taigu, China. - - -Author + + +Author -Zhang, Keshi -0000-0002-9731-078X -Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, 231 Morrin Road, Auckland 1072, New Zealand. & School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1072, New Zealand. -zhangk@landcareresearch.co.nz +Zhang, Keshi +0000-0002-9731-078X +Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, 231 Morrin Road, Auckland 1072, New Zealand. & School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1072, New Zealand. +zhangk@landcareresearch.co.nz - - -Author + + +Author -Fan, Qing-Hai -Plant Health & Environment Laboratory, Ministry for Primary Industries, Auckland, New Zealand. +Fan, Qing-Hai +Plant Health & Environment Laboratory, Ministry for Primary Industries, Auckland, New Zealand. - - -Author + + +Author -Zhang, Zhi-Qiang -0000-0003-4172-0592 -Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, 231 Morrin Road, Auckland 1072, New Zealand. & School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1072, New Zealand. -zhangz@landcareresearch.co.nz +Zhang, Zhi-Qiang +0000-0003-4172-0592 +Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, 231 Morrin Road, Auckland 1072, New Zealand. & School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1072, New Zealand. +zhangz@landcareresearch.co.nz -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-23 + +2024 + +2024-07-23 - -5485 + +5485 - -1 + +1 - -7 -37 + +7 +37 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.4 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.4 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.4 -1175-5326 -13209607 -8AC64636-41D9-4027-B34E-D28CA69796E4 +journal article +301518 +10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.4 +e9b2b1b4-ae6c-42a2-9860-0a6817721334 +1175-5326 +13209607 +8AC64636-41D9-4027-B34E-D28CA69796E4 - + @@ -788,7 +790,7 @@ Chelicera (Fig. 1C) with movable digit 20 (19–21) long, bearing two teeth, fix ) and four simple setae; tarsal apotele two-tined. ­ Hypostome ( -Fig. 3A +Fig. 3A ) with two pairs of hypostomal setae ( h1 and @@ -958,7 +960,7 @@ Chelicera (Fig. 5C) with movable digit 23 (23–27) long, bearing three teeth, f ) and three simple setae; genu bearing a spatulate ( al1 ) and four simple setae; tarsal apotele two-tined. Hypostome ( -Fig. 3B +Fig. 3B ) with three pairs of hypostomal setae ( h1 , @@ -969,7 +971,7 @@ and pc ); deutosternal groove with six rows of denticles, each row bearing two marginal denticles. - + FIGURE­3. @@ -1123,7 +1125,7 @@ Chelicera (Fig. 7C) with movable digit 26 (25–27) long, bearing three teeth, f and al2 ) and five simple setae; tarsal apotele two-tined. Hypostome ( -Fig. 3C +Fig. 3C ) with three pairs of hypostomal setae ( h1 , @@ -1299,7 +1301,7 @@ Chelicera (Fig. 9C) with movable digit 34 (32–36) long, bearing four teeth, fi and al2 ) and four simple setae; tarsal apotele two-tined. Hypostome ( -Fig. 3D +Fig. 3D ) with three pairs of hypostomal setae ( h1 , diff --git a/data/E9/76/87/E97687DDFFB0901110FCC190FA49F932.xml b/data/E9/76/87/E97687DDFFB0901110FCC190FA49F932.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..54b87810f82 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/E9/76/87/E97687DDFFB0901110FCC190FA49F932.xml @@ -0,0 +1,322 @@ + + + +Ontogenetic instars of the oribatid mite Eupterotegaeus nortoni sp. nov. (Acari, Oribatida, Cepheusidae) from U. S. A. + + + +Author + +Ermilov, Sergey G. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-23 + + +5485 + + +1 + + +49 +61 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.6 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.6 +1175-5326 +13209609 +F4508429-0996-45AD-B786-03CC547E9065 + + + + + + +Key to known species of + +Eupterotegaeus + +(adult) + + + + + + + +1. Lamellar cusps nearly quadrangular, mediodistally located very close to each other................................. 2 + + +- Lamellar cusps nearly elongate triangular, mediodistally well distanced from each other............................. 3 + + + + + +2. Lamellar cusp with small mediodistal tooth; bothridial seta long, distinctly longer than half of distance between bothridia; body length: 586–599................ + +E. xizangensis +Wang & Solhøy, 2001 + +(see + +Wang +et al +. 2001 + +). Distribution: +China +( +Tibet +). + + + + +- Lamellar cusp without teeth; bothridial seta comparatively short, not longer than half of distance between bothridia; body length: 785........... + +E. flavus +( +Ewing, 1918 +) + +(see also +Woolley 1957 +; + +Walter +et al +. 2013 + +). Distribution: +U.S.A. +( +Oregon +). + + + + + +3. Interlamellar tooth absent.............................................................................. 4 + + +- Interlamellar tooth present.............................................................................. 7 + + + + + +4. All legs monodactylous; anterior notogastral margin with a pair of tubercles forming enantiophyses with a posterior tubercle of the bothridium; body length: 396–600.............................................................................................. + +E. rhamphosus +Higgins & Woolley, 1968 + +(see also + +Walter +et al +. 2013 + +). Distribution: Nearctic. + + + +- All legs tridactylous; anterior notogastral margin without a pair of tubercles forming enantiophyses with a posterior tubercle of the bothridium....................................................................................... 5 + + + + + +5. Rostral tooth well developed; lamellar cusp with distal toothlike process; body length: 616–755........................ + +Eupterotegaeus ornatissimus +( +Berlese, 1908 +) + +(see also +Kunst 1958 +; +Pérez-Iñigo 1997 +; + +Walter +et al +. 2013 + +). Distribution: Holarctic. + + + +- Rostral tooth minute or absent; lamellar cusp without distal toothlike process..................................... 6 + + + + + +6. Rostrum truncate; rostral tooth minute; lamellae distanced from each other; body length: 612............................................................................ + +E. rostratus +Higgins & Woolley, 1963 + +. Distribution: Nearctic. + + + + +- Rostrum rounded; rostral tooth absent; lamellae partially located close to each other; body length: 620–674........................................................... + +E. hendekensis +Susyal, Ayyildiz & Baran, 2018 + +. Distribution: +Turkey +. + + + + + +7. Rostral tooth present.................................................................................. 8 + + +- Rostral tooth absent................................................................................... 9 + + + + + +8. Rostral tooth medium-sized; lamellar cusp without distal toothlike process; notogastral seta +c +present; body length: 615–630........................................................... + +E. nortoni + + +sp. nov. + +Distribution: +U.S.A. +( +New York +). + + + + +- Rostral tooth small; lamellar cusp with distal toothlike process; notogastral seta +c +absent; body length: 1030...................................................................... + +E. steinboecki +( +Mihelčič, 1958 +) + +. Distribution: +Austria +. + + + + + +9. Interlamellar tooth long, extending anteriorly beyond rostrum................................................. 10 + + +- Interlamellar tooth medium-sized, not reaching rostrum..................................................... 11 + + + + + +10. Bothridial seta with large compact head; lamellar cusp with distal toothlike process; notogastral seta +c +present; body length: 536–645.................................................................................... + +E. armatus +Aoki, 1969 + +(see also +Fujikawa 2002 +; + +Walter +et al +. 2013 + +). Distribution: East of eastern Palaearctic, Southeast +China +, +Costa Rica +. + + + + +- Bothridial seta with elongate clavate head; lamellar cusp without distal toothlike process; notogastral seta +c +absent; body length: 691......................................................... + +E. nasalis +Sitnikova, 1979 + +. Distribution: +Ecuador +. + + + + + + +11. Rostrum truncate; notogastral seta +c +present; body length: 558–594..................................................................... + +E. spinatus +Higgins & Woolley, 1963 + +(see also + +Walter +et al +. 2013 + +). Distribution: +U.S.A. +( +Utah +). + + + + +- Rostrum rounded; notogastral seta +c +absent; body length: 541–616... + +E. dentatus +Sitnikova, 1979 + +. Distribution: Neotropical. + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file