diff --git a/data/6D/22/87/6D2287CC535FFFFFFCDD8338FE5EFDC8.xml b/data/6D/22/87/6D2287CC535FFFFFFCDD8338FE5EFDC8.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6f4056947d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/6D/22/87/6D2287CC535FFFFFFCDD8338FE5EFDC8.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,680 @@
+
+
+
+Delimiting phylogeographic diversity in the genomic era: application to an Iberian endemic frog
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Dufresnes, Christophe
+Laboratory for Amphibian Systematic & Evolutionary Research, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Longpan Rd, 159, 210037 Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Ambu, Johanna
+Laboratory for Amphibian Systematic & Evolutionary Research, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Longpan Rd, 159, 210037 Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Galán, Pedro
+Grupo de Investigación en Bioloxía Evolutiva (GIBE), Departamento de Bioloxía, Facultade de Ciencias, Universidade da Coruña, Campus da Zapateira s / n., 15071 A Coruña, Spain
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Sequeira, Fernando
+CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Geneticos, Campus de Vairão, BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, Universidade do Porto, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, 7, 4485 - 661 Vairão, Portugal
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Viesca, Leticia
+Biodiversity Research Institute (IMIB), University of Oviedo-Principality of Asturias-CSIC, C. Gonzalo Gutiérrez Quirós s / n, 33600 Mieres, Spain & Department of Biology of Organisms and Systems, University of Oviedo, C. Catedrático Rodrigo Uría s / n., 33006 Oviedo, Spain
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Choda, Magdalena
+Department of Biology of Organisms and Systems, University of Oviedo, C. Catedrático Rodrigo Uría s / n., 33006 Oviedo, Spain
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Álvarez, David
+Department of Biology of Organisms and Systems, University of Oviedo, C. Catedrático Rodrigo Uría s / n., 33006 Oviedo, Spain
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Alard, Bérénice
+CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Geneticos, Campus de Vairão, BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, Universidade do Porto, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, 7, 4485 - 661 Vairão, Portugal
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Suchan, Tomasz
+W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lubicz, 46, 31 - 512 Kraków, Poland
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Künzel, Sven
+Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, August-Thienemann-Str, 2, 24306 Plön, Germany
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Martínez-Solano, Iñigo
+Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, MNCN-CSIC, C. de José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Vences, Miguel
+Zoological Institute, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Mendelssohnstr, 4, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Nicieza, Alfredo
+Biodiversity Research Institute (IMIB), University of Oviedo-Principality of Asturias-CSIC, C. Gonzalo Gutiérrez Quirós s / n, 33600 Mieres, Spain & Department of Biology of Organisms and Systems, University of Oviedo, C. Catedrático Rodrigo Uría s / n., 33006 Oviedo, Spain
+
+text
+
+
+Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
+
+
+2024
+
+2023-12-02
+
+
+202
+
+
+1
+
+
+1
+15
+
+
+
+
+http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad170
+
+journal article
+10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad170
+0024-4082
+14244014
+E53C938-C726-40CB-B117-5B9939453DA7
+
+
+
+
+
+Description of
+
+Rana parvipalmata asturiensis
+
+ssp.nov.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+(
+Fig. 6
+)
+
+
+
+ZooBankregistration:
+
+urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:
+89BF6DB4-36E4- 4B3F-9735-D9D5D6F6D699
+
+.
+
+
+Identity:
+Both lineages T1 and T2 are currently assigned to the species
+
+Rana parvipalmata
+
+, a taxon originally described as
+
+Rana temporaria parvipalmata
+López-Seoane, 1885
+
+. The original description (
+López-Seoane 1885
+) reported this taxon from ‘the north-west of
+Spain
+, equally common from the level of the sea to an elevation of 1422 feet’, with the additional mention ‘
+Near Pontevedra
+,
+Tui
+and
+Ferrol
+, it occurs conjointly with
+
+Rana iberica
+
+’—all these explicitly mentioned localities are situated on the
+Galician
+coast.
+Although
+measurements of
+three specimens
+were given, no locality information for these was published and no type material is known to exist (
+Frost 2023
+).
+
+Salvador
+(1974)
+
+proposed to restrict the type locality to ‘
+La Coruña’
+but did not designate a
+lectotype
+or a
+neotype
+. Given the localities and the diagnostic characters purported in the original description (
+
+parvipalmata
+
+means ‘poorly webbed’), it is unambiguous that the nomen
+
+parvipalmata
+
+is to be assigned to lineage T1. For lineage T2, no taxonomic name is available (see e.g.
+Frost 2023
+), and we therefore here describe it as
+
+Rana parvipalmata asturiensis
+
+ssp. nov
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis:
+Rana parvipalmata asturiensis
+
+is a member of the
+
+R. temporaria
+
+complex. It corresponds to phylogeographic lineage T2, distributed in
+Asturias
+and
+northern León
+(northwestern
+Spain
+), which has been recently attributed to the distinct species
+
+R. parvipalmata
+
+based on multilocus mitochondrial and nuclear DNA analyses (
+
+Dufresnes
+et al.
+2020b
+
+). Its closest relative is
+
+Rana parvipalmata parvipalmata
+
+, corresponding to phylogeographic lineage T1 distributed in nearby
+Galicia
+, from which it differs by 1.2% of divergence at mitochondrial genes (~4.4 kb spanning six genes), including 4.7% at
+cyt-b
+and 0.9% at 16S, and by 0.07% at nuclear RAD-seq markers conserved across distant
+
+Rana
+species
+
+(all data from
+
+Vences
+et al.
+2017
+
+and
+
+Dufresnes
+et al.
+2020b
+
+). In the western parts of its range,
+R. p. asturiensis
+features mtDNA haplotypes derived from
+
+R. p.
+parvipalmata
+
+(
+cyt-b
+mitogroup T1b), following hybridization. As identified by MolD,
+R. p. asturiensis
+can be robustly identified by a combination of diagnostic nucleotides: ‘T’ in the site 666, ‘C’ in the site 714, ‘G’ in the site 732 for specimens carrying T1b mtDNA: ‘T’ in the site 627, ‘A’ in the site 715, ‘T’ in the site 825 for specimens carrying T2 mtDNA (positions relative to the full
+cyt-b
+gene of
+
+Rana temporaria
+
+).
+
+
+
+Figure 6.
+The holotype of
+
+Rana parvipalmata asturiensis
+
+(MNCN 50655), depicted live (top) and post-mortem before ethanol preservation (bottom). Credit: C. Dufresnes.
+
+
+
+Externally, the new taxon generally resembles other common frogs of the
+
+R. temporaria
+
+complex. In western ranges,
+R. p. asturiensis
+can be confounded with
+
+R. p.
+parvipalmata
+
+, from which most individuals can be diagnosed by a combination of morphological characters (
+Fig. 5
+; Supporting Information,
+Fig. S4
+), notably body size (larger in
+R. p. asturiensis
+, up to
+80 mm
+), feet webbing (more extensive in
+R. p. asturiensis
+), femur and tibia lengths (respectively shorter and longer in
+R. p. asturiensis
+), and the metatarsal tubercle (larger in
+R. p. asturiensis
+). These differences alone are not fully diagnostic, however, and field identification should take into account distribution, and ideally rely on genetic barcoding. The mating call and tadpole of
+R. p. asturiensis
+have not been studied.
+Vences (1992)
+noted that Galician frogs (
+
+R. p.
+parvipalmata
+
+) featured a lower number of pulses per call compared to populations from Central Europe (
+
+R. temporaria
+
+), but whether this pattern holds across the entire range of
+
+R. parvipalmata
+
+(i.e. including the new subspecies) is unknown. In eastern ranges,
+R. p. asturiensis
+can be confounded with the distinct species
+
+R. temporaria
+
+, from which it remains even more similar phenotypically. Finally, the new taxon shares its range (but rarely its habitats) with the Iberian frog
+
+Rana iberica
+
+but can be reliably distinguished based on a number of diagnostic criteria pertaining to size, shape, and coloration (
+Dufresnes 2019
+).
+
+
+The taxonomic status of
+R. p. asturiensis
+is justified by the genuine evolutionary divergence and morphological differentiation from other
+
+R. parvipalmata
+
+populations, and the subspecies rank is justified by the recent Plio–Pleistocene origin, the weak sequence divergence at barcoding genes, and most importantly the extensive admixture with
+
+R. p.
+parvipalmata
+
+, suggestive of reproductive compatibility.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+:
+
+MNCN 50655, adult male found by
+J. Ambu
+and
+C. Dufresnes
+on
+
+14 March 2021
+
+on a forest track
+c
+.
+
+500 m
+
+northeast of
+Alto de la Fumarea
+,
+Picu Fario area
+,
+Asturias
+,
+Spain
+(43.4306403°, -5.5710408°,
+
+549 m
+a.s.l.
+
+), and deposited at the
+Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales
+(MNCN) in
+Madrid
+,
+Spain
+.
+The
+specimen is depicted both live and post-mortem in
+Fig. 6
+.
+Its
+identity was confirmed by mitochondrial (
+cyt-b
+) and nuclear (RAD-seq) analyses (
+Figs 1–3
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Description of the
+holotype
+:
+
+Body size (SVL) of
+64 mm
+for a wet weight of
+24.1 g
+; head
+16 mm
+wide: large protruding eyes (
+8 mm
+of diameter) spaced by
+12 mm
+, with horizontal pupil; tympanum disk very distinctive and large (
+5 mm
+), located
+3 mm
+behind the eyes; nostrils separated by
+6 mm
+, roughly equidistant from the eye (
+5 mm
+) and the snout (
+6 mm
+); blunt snout with a rounded profile; dorsolateral lines distinguishable, spaced by
+11 mm
+; vomerine teeth present, slightly pigmented, V-shaped and well separated; four fingers (Nos 1–4), including protruding thumbs (No. 1) with dark nuptial pads, and respective size (inner to outer) as follows: 3> 1> 4> 2; slender hind legs almost as long as the body, with femur
+26 mm
+and tibia
+33 mm
+, reaching the nostrils when projected on the head (‘leg test’); tarsus
+30 mm
+with five elongated toes (up to
+31 mm
+) with relatively extensive webbing, of formula I
+1-1
+II
+1/2-1/2
+III
+2/3-2
+IV
+3-3
+V; oval-shaped metatarsal tubercles (
+3 mm
+long by
+2 mm
+high). Smooth skin; colourful dorsum with diffused dark blotches on a light-brown background; hints of creamy yellow on the flanks, groin, and armpits; predominantly white/light grey ventrum with faded dark spots and fine reddish speckles; throat greyish with dark reflections; iris yellow; temporal markings not pronounced (mostly brown, getting darker near the armpits); upper lip with reddish speckles on a light background, whiter near the tympanum and armpit. All observations and measurements were made post-mortem before fixation in ethanol.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Paratype
+:
+
+MNCN 50656, adult female found by
+A.G. Nicieza
+and
+A. Peláez
+on
+
+
+12 March
+2021
+
+
+in a small pool near
+Lagunas de Valdecarrín
+,
+Puerto de Las Señales
+,
+León
+,
+Spain
+(43.07429°, -5.23967°)
+
+,
+
+and deposited at the
+Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales
+(MNCN) in
+Madrid
+,
+Spain
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology:
+The new nomen,
+
+Rana parvipalmata asturiensis
+
+, makes reference to the region of
+Asturias
+where this taxon is mainly distributed. As vernacular names, we recommend using ‘Asturian common frog’ for
+R. p. asturiensis
+, and to restrict the name ‘Galician common frog’ to the subspecies
+
+R. p.
+parvipalmata
+
+. To avoid confusion, the species
+
+R. parvipalmata
+
+as a whole may be referred to as the ‘Western common frog’.
+
+
+
+
+
+Diversity and distribution:
+Rana parvipalmata asturiensis
+
+is distributed in the western part of the
+Cantabrian mountains
+and coastal lowlands that mainly encompass the province of
+Asturias
+. It also mildly penetrates into the neighbouring provinces of
+Castilla y León
+(south) and
+Cantabria
+(southeast). In the west, the subspecies forms an extensive hybrid swarm with
+
+R. p.
+parvipalmata
+
+across Western
+Asturias
+, from about
+La Espina
+to the
+Eo River
+(at the border with
+Galicia
+). In the east,
+R. p. asturiensis
+meets and locally admixes with
+
+R. temporaria
+
+near the border between
+Asturias and Cantabria
+in the north, and near the border between
+Cantabria and Castilla y León
+in the south (
+Montaña Palentina
+). Populations of
+R. p. asturiensis
+are genetically structured due to isolation by distance (
+Choda 2014
+,
+
+Dufresnes
+et al.
+2020b
+
+), but they feature relatively homogenous patterns of genetic diversity at neutral markers (
+Choda 2014
+,
+
+Cano
+et al.
+2017
+
+,
+
+Dufresnes
+et al.
+2020b
+
+). However, lowland and highland populations differ in genes related to metabolic function and immune response (
+
+Cano
+et al.
+2017
+
+).
+
+
+
+
+Natural history:
+Not specifically studied, but presumably similar to other lineages of the
+
+R. temporaria
+
+complex. In
+Asturias
+, common frogs are found across a variety of environments including wetlands, rivers, puddles and ditches in forest tracks, small retention dams, and any kind of low depth water bodies, such as mountain and cattle ponds. The breeding season extends from early autumn to early summer, starting progressively later with higher elevation (
+
+Álvarez
+et al.
+2012
+
+,
+
+Gutiérrez-Pesquera
+et al.
+2022
+
+). The fine-scale spatial distribution may differ between highland areas, where breeding nuclei are larger but more isolated, and the more human-impacted mid-elevation and coastal areas, where breeding occurs in small nuclei in small and often anthropogenic water bodies.
+
+
+
+
+Conservation:
+The Asturian common frog is abundant and widespread throughout its range, hence it is probably not threatened despite its narrow distribution (
+c
+. 10 000 km
+2
+). The higher risks may be related to climate change and timber exploitation. Analyses of thermal tolerance and mechanistic niche modelling suggest a high vulnerability to climate warming, and suitability area projections point to an upward retreat of
+R. p. asturiensis
+populations, and extinction in most of the southern distribution ranges (
+
+Enriquez-Urzelai
+et al.
+2018
+
+,
+2019a
+, b, 2020,
+
+Gutiérrez-Pesquera
+et al.
+2022
+
+). Although forestry promotes suitable water bodies associated with forest tracks, eucalypt tree plantations may have a negative effect because eucalypt leachates are detrimental to the growth and development of larvae (
+
+Burraco
+et al.
+2018
+
+,
+
+Iglesias-Carrasco
+et al.
+2022
+
+), and ultimately to metamorph survival (D. Álvarez and A.G. Nicieza unpublished data). Differences in functional genetic diversity along the altitudinal gradient (
+
+Cano
+et al.
+2017
+
+) suggest that conservation actions should be population specific.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/94/10/87/941087F1CB4AFFF3DF524EE1FC3FCBD5.xml b/data/94/10/87/941087F1CB4AFFF3DF524EE1FC3FCBD5.xml
index 42e0d33ba6a..4621557bdb4 100644
--- a/data/94/10/87/941087F1CB4AFFF3DF524EE1FC3FCBD5.xml
+++ b/data/94/10/87/941087F1CB4AFFF3DF524EE1FC3FCBD5.xml
@@ -1,48 +1,48 @@
-
-
-
-Redefinition of the sexstrigatus group of Lasioglossum (Hemihalictus) Cockerell, 1897 (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Halictidae), with a revision of Japanese species
+
+
+
+Redefinition of the sexstrigatus group of Lasioglossum (Hemihalictus) Cockerell, 1897 (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Halictidae), with a revision of Japanese species
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Murao, Ryuki
-7E665839-6675-4365-A7EA-169D4E4DA008
-Regional Environmental Planning Co., Ltd, 1 - 10 - 12, Muromi, Sawara-ku, Fukuoka, 814 – 0015 Japan.
-r.murao@mbr.nifty.com
+Murao, Ryuki
+7E665839-6675-4365-A7EA-169D4E4DA008
+Regional Environmental Planning Co., Ltd, 1 - 10 - 12, Muromi, Sawara-ku, Fukuoka, 814 – 0015 Japan.
+r.murao@mbr.nifty.com
-text
-
-
-European Journal of Taxonomy
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
-
-2021
-
-2021-08-18
+
+2021
+
+2021-08-18
-
-763
+
+763
-
-1
-74
+
+1
+74
-
-http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.763.1463
+
+http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.763.1463
-journal article
-4854
-10.5852/ejt.2021.763.1463
-31f73be9-4a90-4c0a-937e-784437eff4bd
-2118-9773
-5235968
-9823AAD7-1113-434B-9882-1CF885DE7CED
+journal article
+4854
+10.5852/ejt.2021.763.1463
+31f73be9-4a90-4c0a-937e-784437eff4bd
+2118-9773
+5235968
+9823AAD7-1113-434B-9882-1CF885DE7CED
-
+
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ species:
-
+
Sudila
Cameron, 1898: 52
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ species:
(
type
species:
-
+
Sudila bidentata
Cameron, 1898
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ species:
-
+
Ceylonicola
Friese, 1918: 501
@@ -128,12 +128,12 @@ species:
(
type
species:
-
+
Ceylonicola atra
Friese, 1918
=
-
+
Sudila bidentata
Cameron, 1898
@@ -269,6 +269,7 @@ Brullé, 1832
+
Lasioglossum
(
@@ -282,7 +283,9 @@ species:
Halictus mediocris
Benoist, 1962
-, by original designation).
+, by original designation)
+
+.