diff --git a/data/03/CE/AF/03CEAF1AFF93EA1E6193FA240184FAEC.xml b/data/03/CE/AF/03CEAF1AFF93EA1E6193FA240184FAEC.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0f5af9fd093
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/03/CE/AF/03CEAF1AFF93EA1E6193FA240184FAEC.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,333 @@
+
+
+
+The deep-sea species of Triphoridae (Gastropoda, Triphoroidea) from Guadeloupe, sampled by the Karubenthos 2 expedition
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Fernandes, Maurício Romulo
+3B8B864F-3300-45B2-8D1F-61F282F83CDE
+Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Av. Pasteur, 458, Urca, 22290 - 240, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
+mauriciofernandes14@hotmail.com
+
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-12-11
+
+
+972
+
+
+1
+52
+
+
+
+
+https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2763/12649
+
+journal article
+10.5852/ejt.2024.972.2763
+2118-9773
+14506799
+5571E5E4-47CC-43FB-B5AC-7388E403A73E
+
+
+
+
+“
+
+
+Inella
+”
+harryleei
+
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés, 2008
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 1
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Inella harryleei
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés, 2008: 105
+
+
+, fig. 13a–k.
+
+
+
+
+“
+
+Inella
+”
+harryleei
+
+–
+
+Fernandes & Pimenta 2019a
+
+: fig. 3k–l; 2019b: 46, figs 2l, 30–32.
+
+
+
+
+
+Inella harryleei
+
+–
+
+Leal 2021: 6
+
+, fig. 38.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+material
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+
+USA
+• sh;
+Florida
+, off
+Dry Tortugas
+; depth
+
+90 m
+
+;
+FLMNH 419182
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Paratypes
+
+See
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés (2008)
+
+.
+
+
+
+Material examined
+
+
+
+
+GUADELOUPE
+(
+Karubenthos 2 expedition
+) • 2 sh; stn DW4592;
+MNHN
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+Emended description
+
+
+
+Shell sinistral, conical-fusiform, up to
+15.9 mm
+long,
+2.4 mm
+wide, length/width ratio 6.6, apical angle of early whorls 11°. Protoconch paucispiral, three whorls,
+0.96 mm
+long,
+0.57 mm
+wide; first whorl smooth, inflated, only slightly narrower than subsequent whorls, which have two thin, nearly smooth spiral cords, situated at 33% and 76% of last whorl height; transition to teleoconch nearly indistinct. Teleoconch with up to 20 whorls; two spiral cords (adapical and abapical) in beginning of teleoconch, continuous to those of protoconch, but abapical one considerably more developed until body whorl; median spiral cord emerges very narrowly at end of second whorl, slowly developing but never reaching same size as other cords; suture shallow, with a smooth to slightly wavy sutural cord; 16–17 opisthocline axial ribs on 12
+th
+teleoconch whorl; medium to large-sized (on abapical cord), rounded to slightly elliptical nodules; nodulous, moderately thin subperipheral cord, with a slightly nodulous adapical basal cord right below it and a thin, nearly smooth abapical basal cord situated apart; no evident supranumerical cord; nearly rounded aperture,
+1.1 mm
+long,
+0.84 mm
+wide, length/width ratio 1.3; anterior canal very long, partially open, directed downward, 1.0 mm long,
+0.45 mm
+wide, length/width ratio 2.3. Shell mainly white, stained by few and discrete light brown (or cream) axial patches, usually comprising width of one or two axial ribs.
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 1.
+“
+
+Inella
+”
+harryleei
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés, 2008
+
+.
+A–E
+. MNHN, stn DW4592, 15.9 mm, 10.6 mm. Scale bars: A–B, D–E = 1 mm; C = 500 µm.
+
+
+
+
+
+Remarks
+
+
+
+The only known protoconch of “
+
+I
+.”
+harryleei
+
+from
+Guadeloupe
+(
+Fig. 1C
+) has a first whorl apparently more inflated than those illustrated in the original description, from
+Florida
+and
+Louisiana
+(
+USA
+), although all other shell features are very similar. Based on the nearest record from the
+Florida
+Keys (
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés 2008
+), the present record extends the known range of “
+
+I
+.”
+harryleei
+
+by ~
+2180 km
+into the Caribbean. However,
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés (2008)
+indicated a shell fragment from the ‘West Indies’ as possibly belonging to this species.
+
+
+Lamy & Pointier (2018: 284
+, pl. 91 fig. 7a–b) identified a shell from
+Guadeloupe
+as
+
+Inella
+aff.
+harryleei
+
+, following the morph from Florida illustrated by
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés (2008)
+under this name. In fact, the teleoconch of this shell from
+Guadeloupe
+differs from that of “
+
+I
+.”
+harryleei
+
+(see
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés 2008
+for further details). Moreover, this shell has an abapical spiral cord that is even more prominent than that of “
+I
+.”
+
+aff.
+harryleei
+
+from Florida. Unfortunately, the broken apex of the shell from
+Guadeloupe
+precluded further comparisons.
+Lamy & Pointier (2018)
+indicated a depth range of
+55–360 m
+for this morph; considering that “
+I
+.”
+
+aff.
+harryleei
+
+from Florida is only known from
+55 m
+(
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés 2008
+), only the depth of
+360 m
+is confidently assigned to this peculiar shell from
+Guadeloupe
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+Geographic distribution
+
+
+
+USA
+:
+Florida
+(
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés 2008
+;
+Fernandes & Pimenta 2019b
+),
+Louisiana
+(
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés 2008
+;
+Garcia & Lee 2020
+);
+Guadeloupe
+(this study).
+
+
+
+Bathymetric distribution
+
+
+
+Empty shells previously known from
+46–500 m
+(
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés 2008
+), live specimens only known from
+63 m
+(
+Fernandes & Pimenta 2019b
+). This study:
+201–214 m
+(empty shells).
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/03/CE/AF/03CEAF1AFF95EA106220FAA40780FA6D.xml b/data/03/CE/AF/03CEAF1AFF95EA106220FAA40780FA6D.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..29cb3ba1c5a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/03/CE/AF/03CEAF1AFF95EA106220FAA40780FA6D.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,742 @@
+
+
+
+The deep-sea species of Triphoridae (Gastropoda, Triphoroidea) from Guadeloupe, sampled by the Karubenthos 2 expedition
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Fernandes, Maurício Romulo
+3B8B864F-3300-45B2-8D1F-61F282F83CDE
+Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Av. Pasteur, 458, Urca, 22290 - 240, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
+mauriciofernandes14@hotmail.com
+
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-12-11
+
+
+972
+
+
+1
+52
+
+
+
+
+https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2763/12649
+
+journal article
+10.5852/ejt.2024.972.2763
+2118-9773
+14506799
+5571E5E4-47CC-43FB-B5AC-7388E403A73E
+
+
+
+
+“
+
+
+Inella
+”
+longissima
+
+(
+Dall, 1881
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+Figs 2–5
+
+
+
+
+
+Triforis
+(
+Ino
+)
+longissimus
+Dall, 1881: 80
+
+.
+
+
+
+Triforis
+(
+Inella
+)
+longissima
+
+–
+Dall 1889a: 246
+, pl. 20 fig. 10; 1889b: 138, pl. 20 fig. 10.
+
+
+
+Triphora longissima
+
+–
+Abbott 1974: 112
+, fig. 1138 (a reproduction of Dall’s illustration).
+
+
+
+Inella longissima
+
+–
+Garcia & Lee 2002: 11
+. —
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés 2008: 100
+, figs 10, 36d (the latter is a reproduction of Dall’s illustration). —
+
+Rosenberg
+et al
+. 2009: 645
+
+. —
+Lamy & Pointier
+2018: 286, pl. 91 fig. 8a–b.
+
+
+“
+
+Inella
+”
+longissima
+
+–
+Fernandes & Pimenta 2019a
+: fig. 3j.
+
+
+
+
+non
+
+Inella triserialis
+Dall, 1881
+
+–
+Lamy & Pointier 2018: 286
+, pl. 91 fig. 9.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+material
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Lectotype
+
+CUBA
+• sh; off
+Havana
+;
+23°09′00″ N
+,
+82°21′30″ W
+; depth
+
+320 m
+
+;
+Blake 1877–1878 Exped.
+;
+MCZ 7381
+
+.
+
+
+
+Material examined
+
+
+
+
+GUADELOUPE
+(
+Karubenthos 2 expedition
+) • 2 sh, worn; stn DW4508;
+MNHN
+
+•
+
+16 sh and
+1 spec.
+stored dry; stn DW4549;
+MNHN
+
+•
+
+2 sh; stn DW4550;
+MNHN
+
+•
+
+5 sh; stn DW4554;
+MNHN
+
+•
+
+9 sh and
+1 spec.
+stored in ethanol; stn DW4555; MNHN-IM-2019-20012 (for the live
+specimen
+)
+
+•
+
+1 sh; stn DW4556;
+MNHN
+
+•
+
+2 sh; stn DW4572;
+MNHN
+
+•
+
+3 sh; stn DW4577;
+MNHN
+
+•
+
+1 sh; stn DW4589;
+MNHN
+
+•
+
+5 sh; stn DW4592;
+MNHN
+
+•
+
+18 sh and
+2 spec.
+stored dry; stn DW4613;
+MNHN
+
+•
+
+1 sh and
+1 spec.
+stored dry; stn DW4615;
+MNHN
+
+•
+
+5 sh; stn DW4634;
+MNHN
+
+•
+
+1 sh; stn DW4637;
+MNHN
+
+•
+
+8 sh; stn DW4646;
+MNHN
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 2.
+“
+
+Inella
+”
+longissima
+(
+Dall, 1881
+)
+
+.
+A–C
+. MNHN-IM-2019-20012, stn DW4555, 10.6 mm.
+D–G
+. MNHN, stn DW4555, 13.4 mm, 10.5 mm.
+H–M
+. MNHN, stn DW4549, 14.7 mm, 13.6 mm, 8.7 mm. Scale bars: A, C–D, F, H, J, L = 1 mm; B, E, G, I, K, M = 500 µm.
+
+
+
+
+
+Emended description
+
+
+
+Shell sinistral, conical-fusiform, up to
+20.1 mm
+long (adult shells reach at least
+8.7 mm
+in length),
+2.8 mm
+wide, length/width ratio 5.5–7.1, apical angle of early whorls 13–15°. Protoconch paucispiral, 2.5–3.0 whorls,
+0.55–0.64 mm
+long,
+0.42–0.62 mm
+wide; first whorl smooth, slightly to considerably inflated, sometimes with same width as subsequent whorls; subsequent whorls with two main spiral cords (situated at 35–44% and 65–70% of last whorl height), the abapical one slightly to considerably more prominent, in addition to a narrow subsutural cord; transition to teleoconch gradual, nearly indistinct. Teleoconch with up to 30 whorls; two spiral cords (adapical and abapical) in beginning of teleoconch, continuous with those of protoconch; median spiral cord emerges narrowly between fourth and eighth whorls, bordering close to adapical cord and slowly developing, reaching nearly same size as abapical cord (adapical one more prominent) only in body whorl of large shells; suture shallow, with a small sutural cord; 19–21 opisthocline axial ribs on 12
+th
+teleoconch whorl; medium-sized, rounded to slightly elliptical nodules; nearly smooth subperipheral cord, with one or two smooth, very thin basal cords right below subperipheral cord; a weak supranumerical cord may form between median and abapical spiral cords; rounded to slightly elliptical aperture,
+0.88–1.24 mm
+long,
+0.67–1.09 mm
+wide, length/width ratio 1.1–1.5; anterior canal can be moderately long, partially to almost closed,
+0.38–0.97 mm
+long,
+0.30–0.43 mm
+wide, length/width ratio 1.0–2.1; posterior canal as a deep sinus and almost detached from aperture, or as a rounded orifice, completely detached from aperture. White shell.
+
+
+
+Fig. 3.
+“
+
+Inella
+”
+longissima
+(
+Dall, 1881
+)
+
+.
+A–D
+. MNHN, stn DW4549, 11.9 mm, 11.2 mm.
+E–F
+. MNHN, stn DW4613, 20.1 mm.
+G–J
+. MNHN, stn DW4550, 10.0 mm, 10.5 mm.
+K–L
+. MNHN, stn DW4572, 19.0 mm. Scale bars: A, C, E, G, I, K = 1 mm; B, D, F, H, J, L = 500 µm.
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 4.
+“
+
+Inella
+”
+longissima
+(
+Dall, 1881
+)
+
+.
+A–D
+. MNHN, stn DW4613, 12.8 mm, 10.8 mm.
+E–F
+. MNHN, stn DW4615, 11.2 mm.
+G–H
+. MNHN, stn DW4637, 16.0 mm.
+I–J
+. MNHN, stn DW4549 (same shell as Fig. 2H). Scale bars: A, C, E, G, I–J = 1 mm; B, D, F, H = 500 µm.
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 5.
+“
+
+Inella
+”
+longissima
+(
+Dall, 1881
+)
+
+, MNHN-IM-2019-20012, stn DW4555.
+A
+. Outer jaw.
+B, D–F
+. Radula.
+C
+. Operculum. Minor letters indicate central (C), lateral (L) and first marginal (M1) teeth. Scale bars: A = 20 µm; B, D = 5 µm; C = 100 µm; E–F = 10 µm.
+
+
+
+Large eyes. Operculum thin, semi-transparent, nearly rounded to elliptical, multispiral, nucleus subcentral, dislocated 19% from center toward margin.Jaw with scales varying in shape, but mostly rectangular (
+12.5–14.4 mm
+long, 3.5–4.0 mm wide, ratio length/width 3.3–3.8), rectangular-bilobed (
+11.4–16.5 mm
+long,
+4.4–6.1 mm
+wide, ratio length/width 2.1–3.7) or composed of irregular, large polygons (up to
+18.1 mm
+long), sometimes square. Radula 12-1-1-1-12, with little differentiation in teeth morphology; central tooth comb-like, with five elongated cusps, central and marginal cusps slightly shorter and thinner than cusps 2 and 4; lateral teeth comb-like, with five elongated cusps, marginal cusps slightly shorter, marginal and central cusps slightly thinner than cusps 2 and 4; M1–M11 with four elongated cusps, gradual narrowing of teeth from M1 to M11, as well as shortening of cusps 1 (especially) and 4, which are ~74% of length of cusps 2 and
+3 in
+M1, instead of ~42% (cusp 1) or ~64% (cusp 4) of length of cusps 2 and
+3 in
+M11; M12 reduced, with three cusps (after complete reduction of former cusp
+1 in
+other marginal teeth), central one more elongated than lateral cusps; central tooth up to 4.0 µm wide, lateral teeth up to 4.3 µm wide, M1 up to 3.5 µm wide, M12 up to 1.3 µm wide.
+
+
+
+
+
+Remarks
+
+
+
+“
+
+Inella
+”
+longissima
+
+was previously recorded from
+Guadeloupe
+(between 200 and
+500 m
+) by
+Lamy & Pointier (2018)
+. In addition, they applied the name
+
+Inella triserialis
+(
+Dall, 1881
+)
+
+to a very similar morph from
+Martinique
+. The few apparent differences between these two morphs are the smaller shell length (
+10 mm
+in the figured shell of the morph named as
+
+I
+.
+triserialis
+
+vs
+20.7 mm
+in the figured shell of “
+
+I
+.”
+longissima
+
+) and the earlier development of the median spiral cord in the supposed
+
+I
+.
+triserialis
+
+. Adult shells from Karubenthos 2 also show a broad range in length (
+8.7–20.1 mm
+), which results in large differences with respect to where the median spiral cord of the teleoconch emerges (between the fourth and eight whorls, respectively in small and large shells). However, there is little variation in the dimensions and number of protoconch whorls (2.5–3.0), the more or less inflated first protoconch whorl and certain teleoconch features (e.g., the number of axial ribs). I cannot split the current identification of “
+
+I
+.”
+longissima
+
+from
+Guadeloupe
+in more than one species, and I regard
+
+I
+.
+triserialis
+
+from
+Martinique
+(
+Lamy & Pointier 2018
+) as conspecific.
+
+
+The protoconch of “
+
+I
+.”
+longissima
+
+from
+Guadeloupe
+matches that of a juvenile from the
+Florida
+Keys,
+USA
+(
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés 2008
+: fig. 10f), which was up to now the only image of a protoconch of this species. The only inconsistency between the shells from
+Florida
+,
+Bahamas
+and
+Cuba
+described by
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés (2008)
+and those from
+Guadeloupe
+(
+Lamy & Pointier 2018
+; this study) is related to which spiral cord is slightly more prominent on the teleoconch: in the first study it is the abapical one, whereas in
+Guadeloupe
+it is the adapical one. The shell with unspecified locality shown by
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés (2008
+: fig. 10b, g) is certainly from another species if compared to shells from
+Guadeloupe
+, with the adapical cord even weaker than the median cord in later whorls. The welldeveloped, almost closed posterior canal of “
+
+I
+.”
+longissima
+
+is illustrated in shells from
+Guadeloupe
+(
+Fig. 4J
+;
+Lamy & Pointier 2018
+: fig. 8b) and in the
+lectotype
+(
+Dall 1889a
+,
+1889b
+).
+
+
+Dall (1889b)
+put the northern limit of “
+
+I
+.”
+longissima
+
+at Cape Hatteras,
+North Carolina
+(
+USA
+), and the southern limit in
+Cuba
+(but the species is also present in the Florida Keys and in the ‘West Indies’, a term which comprises
+Cuba
+). The record from Cape Hatteras, reproduced by
+Abbott (1974)
+and
+
+Rosenberg
+et al
+. (2009)
+
+, seems to be a mistake, because
+Dall (1889b)
+did not list the species for the so-called ‘districts’ in the respective columns, from
+New Jersey
+to Biscayne Bay (
+Florida
+). This species seems to be mostly from the Caribbean deep sea, apparently extending northwards to
+Louisiana
+,
+USA
+(
+Garcia & Lee 2002
+,
+2020
+; although not illustrated). The records from
+Brazil
+provided by
+Rios (1985
+,
+1994
+,
+2009
+) are erroneous (
+Fernandes & Pimenta 2019a
+).
+
+
+There are errors in the literature in relation to the bathymetric range of “
+
+I
+.”
+longissima
+
+.
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés (2008)
+cited
+175 m
+as the depth for the
+lectotype
+(repeated by
+Bakker & Albano 2022
+), but
+Dall (1889a)
+indicated the depth as 175–450 fathoms (=
+320–823 m
+). Accordingly, the coordinates cited here for the
+lectotype
+follow the
+MCZ
+Invertebrate Zoology online database (https://mcz.harvard.edu/invertebrate-zoology-research-collection), but not those provided by
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés (2008)
+, with a wrong latitude.
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés (2008)
+did not provide the depth for the lots ANSP 368279 (
+Bahamas
+) and ANSP 312592 (Florida Keys), but the online database of the respective collection (http://clade.ansp.org/malacology/collections/) indicates respectively
+500 m
+and
+183 m
+(here followed). The broad depth range (
+73–1040 m
+) provided by
+
+Rosenberg
+et al
+. (2009)
+
+is partly erroneous, because the depth of
+1040 m
+was based on
+Rios (1985
+,
+1994
+,
+2009
+), i.e., a wrong identification for shells from
+Brazil
+; the shallowest record is based on the depth range (
+73–402 m
+) which
+Abbott (1974)
+provided for this species from West Florida, and it requires confirmation because the material was not figured.
+
+
+Anatomic features of “
+
+I
+.”
+longissima
+
+are herein studied for the first time. The species has welldeveloped eyes (
+Fig. 2C
+), considerably larger than those of
+
+Strobiligera
+species
+
+from deeper waters (
+Fig. 18B
+), suggesting that “
+
+I
+.”
+longissima
+
+is not confined to waters with a complete absence of light. The operculum with a subcentral nucleus and the radula with many, weakly differentiated comb-like teeth (but marginal teeth considerably reduced) perfectly match with the current concept of
+
+Monophorus
+Grillo, 1877
+
+(
+Fernandes & Pimenta 2019b
+). However, an ongoing molecular phylogeny of
+Triphoroidea
+(in prep.) has raised suspicion about the monophyly of
+
+Monophorus
+
+, and the generic position of “
+
+I
+.”
+longissima
+
+will be discussed further.
+
+
+
+
+
+Geographic distribution
+
+
+
+USA
+:
+Florida
+(
+Dall 1889b
+;
+Abbott 1974
+;
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés 2008
+),
+Louisiana
+(
+Garcia & Lee 2002
+,
+2020
+);
+Bahamas
+(
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés 2008
+);
+Cuba
+(
+Dall 1889a
+,
+1889b
+);
+Guadeloupe
+(
+Lamy & Pointier 2018
+; this study);
+Martinique
+(
+Lamy & Pointier 2018
+– as
+
+Inella triserialis
+
+).
+
+
+
+Bathymetric distribution
+
+
+
+Empty shells previously known from
+73–823 m
+(
+Dall 1889b
+;
+Abbott 1974
+). This study:
+100–482 m
+(empty shells),
+100–402 m
+(live specimens).
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/03/CE/AF/03CEAF1AFF9BEA1661D8FA2604F5FA5E.xml b/data/03/CE/AF/03CEAF1AFF9BEA1661D8FA2604F5FA5E.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c9216bfe106
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/03/CE/AF/03CEAF1AFF9BEA1661D8FA2604F5FA5E.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,281 @@
+
+
+
+The deep-sea species of Triphoridae (Gastropoda, Triphoroidea) from Guadeloupe, sampled by the Karubenthos 2 expedition
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Fernandes, Maurício Romulo
+3B8B864F-3300-45B2-8D1F-61F282F83CDE
+Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Av. Pasteur, 458, Urca, 22290 - 240, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
+mauriciofernandes14@hotmail.com
+
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-12-11
+
+
+972
+
+
+1
+52
+
+
+
+
+https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2763/12649
+
+journal article
+10.5852/ejt.2024.972.2763
+2118-9773
+14506799
+5571E5E4-47CC-43FB-B5AC-7388E403A73E
+
+
+
+
+“
+
+
+Inella
+”
+pseudolongissima
+
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés, 2008
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 6
+
+
+
+
+
+Inella pseudolongissima
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés, 2008: 102
+
+, fig. 11.
+
+
+“
+
+Inella
+”
+pseudolongissima
+
+–
+Fernandes & Pimenta 2019a
+: fig.
+3n.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+material
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+
+CUBA
+• sh; off
+Havana
+;
+823 m
+(as stated in the original description) or
+
+444–823 m
+
+(as stated on the NMNH invertebrate collection website);
+Blake Expedition
+;
+USNM 87316
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Paratypes
+
+See
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés (2008)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+Material examined
+
+
+
+
+GUADELOUPE
+(
+Karubenthos 2 expedition
+) • 5 sh; stn DW4549;
+MNHN
+
+•
+
+4 sh; stn DW4550;
+MNHN
+
+•
+
+2 sh; stn DW4589;
+MNHN
+
+•
+
+1 sh
+juv.
+; stn DW4599;
+MNHN
+
+•
+
+1 sh; stn DW4601;
+MNHN
+
+•
+
+1 sh; stn DW4634;
+MNHN
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+Emended description
+
+
+
+Shell sinistral, conical-fusiform, up to
+19.9 mm
+long (adult shells reach at least
+12.6 mm
+in length),
+2.7 mm
+wide, length/width ratio 6.2–8.0, apical angle of early whorls 11–13°. Protoconch multispiral, columnar, 4.0–6.0 whorls,
+0.84–1.48 mm
+long,
+0.55–0.66 mm
+wide; first whorl smooth, not inflated; on second whorl two thin spiral cordlets appear (situated at 34–37% and 66–73% of whorl height), but abapical spiral cordlet sometimes thinner than adapical one and may appear only on third whorl; both cordlets may resemble only slight elevations in some shells instead of true cordlets due to their minute width; transition to teleoconch gradual, nearly indistinct. Teleoconch with up to 28 whorls; two spiral cords (adapical and abapical) in beginning of teleoconch, continuous with cordlets of protoconch; median spiral cord emerges narrowly between fourth and sixth whorls, bordering closely to adapical cord, slowly developing and reaching nearly same size as other cords only on body whorl (abapical cord can be slightly more developed than other cords in late whorls); suture shallow, with a smooth sutural cord; 18–19 opisthocline axial ribs on 18
+th
+teleoconch whorl; medium-sized, nearly rounded to slightly elliptical nodules; slightly nodulous to nearly smooth subperipheral cord, with a smooth, thin basal cord right below it; no supranumerical cord; elliptical aperture,
+1.4–1.5 mm
+long, 1.0–
+1.3 mm
+wide, length/ width ratio 1.2–1.3; anterior canal open to partially open, directed downward,
+0.60–0.74 mm
+long,
+0.46–0.53 mm
+wide, length/width ratio 1.3–1.5; posterior canal as a deep sinus, almost detached from aperture. Shell white to faintly cream.
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 6.
+“
+
+Inella
+”
+pseudolongissima
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés, 2008
+
+.
+A–B, I
+. MNHN, stn DW4549, 19.9 mm.
+C–D, H
+. MNHN, stn DW4589, 19.6 mm.
+E–F
+. MNHN, stn DW4634, 12.6 mm.
+G
+. MNHN, stn DW4550, 5.4 mm. Scale bars: A, C, E, G–I = 1 mm; B, D, F = 500 µm.
+
+
+
+
+
+Remarks
+
+
+
+The current record from
+Guadeloupe
+extends the known range of “
+
+I
+.”
+pseudolongissima
+
+by ~
+2300 km
+. Agreeing with the original description and illustrations, shells from
+Guadeloupe
+are highly variable with respect to the size and number of protoconch whorls (although always multispiral, with at least four whorls), the strength of the spiral cordlets of the protoconch and the strength of the abapical spiral cord of the teleoconch (
+Fig. 6
+). The variation in the size and number of protoconch whorls may be related to the duration of embryonal growth within the egg; see
+Fernandes & Pimenta (2019a)
+for a discussion on other triphorids with a supposed long duration of intracapsular metamorphosis, resulting in multispiral protoconchs for species with a supposed non-planktotrophic development.
+
+
+
+
+
+Geographic distribution
+
+
+
+USA
+:
+Florida
+(
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés 2008
+);
+Cuba
+(
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés 2008
+);
+Guadeloupe
+(this study).
+
+
+
+Bathymetric distribution
+
+
+
+Empty shells previously known from
+77–823 m
+(
+Rolán & Fernández-Garcés 2008
+). This study:
+150– 632 m
+(empty shells).
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file