diff --git a/data/03/8F/87/038F87A8401F567CB5E0B27EE920FE19.xml b/data/03/8F/87/038F87A8401F567CB5E0B27EE920FE19.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a6b47ee0449
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/03/8F/87/038F87A8401F567CB5E0B27EE920FE19.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
+
+
+
+A new species of Ctenocheles Kishinouye, 1926 (Decapoda, Axiidea, Ctenochelidae) from China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Kou, Qi
+Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, Shandong 266071, China & Laboratory for Marine Biology and Biotechnology, Laoshan Laboratory, Qingdao, Shandong 266237, China & University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Poore, Gary C. B.
+Museums Victoria, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Li, Xinzheng
+Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, Shandong 266071, China & Laboratory for Marine Biology and Biotechnology, Laoshan Laboratory, Qingdao, Shandong 266237, China & University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-10-25
+
+
+5529
+
+
+2
+
+
+381
+395
+
+
+
+
+http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5529.2.9
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5529.2.9
+1175-5326
+14022565
+C451EEC7-AE2D-410E-9A79-5634C1BA08C7
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Genus
+
+Ctenocheles
+Kishinouye, 1926
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Ctenocheles
+Kishinouye, 1926: 36
+
+
+(
+type
+species:
+
+Ctenocheles balssi
+Kishinouye, 1926
+
+, by original designation and monotypy).—
+
+Holthuis 1967: 377
+
+.—de
+
+Saint Laurent 1973: 514
+
+.—
+
+Poore & Griffin 1979: 277
+
+.—de
+
+Saint Laurent & Le Loeuff 1979: 81–83
+
+.—
+
+Manning & Felder 1991: 784
+
+.—
+
+Sakai 1999: 88
+
+.—
+
+Davie 2002: 464
+
+.—
+
+Sakai 2005: 237–238
+
+.—
+
+Sakai 2011: 486– 487
+
+(key to species).—
+
+
+Hyžný
+et al
+. 2014: 249–250
+
+
+.—
+
+Poore & Dworschak 2017: 122
+
+(synonymy).—
+
+
+Poore
+et al
+. 2019: 118–119
+
+
+.—
+
+Poore & Ahyong 2023: 199–200
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Tosacallianassa
+Sakai, 2016: 813
+
+
+(
+type
+species:
+
+Tosacallianassa hatasagaensis
+Sakai, 2016
+
+, by original designation and monotypy).
+
+
+
+
+
+Remarks.
+For the most recent diagnoses of
+
+Ctenocheles
+Kishinouye, 1926
+
+, see
+
+Poore
+et al
+. (2019)
+
+and
+Poore & Ahyong (2023)
+. Distributions and depths ranges of species are given in
+Table 2
+.
+
+Ctenocheles
+
+differs from
+
+Ctenocheloides
+Anker, 2010
+
+, the only other axiidean genus with elongate, pectinate cheliped fingers, by: (1) the presence of an acute, projecting rostrum; (2) the small and poorly pigmented corneas; (3) the longer fingers of the major cheliped (≥ 1.5 times the length of palm); (4) the longer and sharper teeth on the cutting edges of the major cheliped; (5) the truncate posterior margin of telson; and (6) the presence of a notch on the distal margin of the uropodal exopod (except for
+
+Ctenocheles plantei
+(
+Burukovsky, 2005
+))
+
+. Besides,
+
+Ctenocheloides
+
+inhabits shallower water (less than
+15 m
+, usually
+1–1.5 m
+) than
+
+Ctenocheles
+
+(deeper than
+10 m
+, up to
+800 m
+) (
+Matsuzawa & Hayashi 1997
+;
+Anker & Pachelle 2013
+;
+Poore 2015
+), which might explain why it has well-developed corneas.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/03/EF/87/03EF8798FFADFF8866E8FF79F467F869.xml b/data/03/EF/87/03EF8798FFADFF8866E8FF79F467F869.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4cc9e47833f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/03/EF/87/03EF8798FFADFF8866E8FF79F467F869.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,519 @@
+
+
+
+A new species of Coelidiana Oman (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Neocoelidiinae) from Brazil with key to Brazilian species, description of immature stages, and notes about parasitoids and host plant
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Gonçalves, Clayton Corrêa
+0000-0003-3045-3425
+Laboratório de Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
+clayton.correa.goncalves@gmail.com
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Silva, Jean Francisco Souza Da
+0009-0000-6528-9835
+Departamento de Zoologia, Setor de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
+jeanfco99@gmail.com
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Domahovski, Alexandre Cruz
+0000-0003-4588-4236
+Laboratório de Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
+domahovskiac@yahoo.com.br
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Alasmar, Luísa
+0000-0001-8210-1080
+Departamento de Zoologia, Setor de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
+lualasmar@gmail.com
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Paladini, Andressa
+0000-0001-8894-6092
+Departamento de Zoologia, Setor de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
+andri.paladini@gmail.com
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-10-25
+
+
+5529
+
+
+2
+
+
+359
+372
+
+
+
+
+http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5529.2.7
+
+journal article
+304957
+10.11646/zootaxa.5529.2.7
+016f1363-77a3-4bc8-badb-7e81d56dbc6a
+1175-5326
+14022520
+32D3A3D6-7CAC-4098-BBBE-A932CB9FC8A6
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Key to
+
+Coelidiana
+
+species recorded for
+Brazil
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+1 Forewings each with a dark stripe along the base and anal margin, forming a large X when at rest...................... 2
+
+
+1’ Forewings without dark stripes, or if present, narrow and longitudinal, not forming X when at rest..................... 3
+
+
+
+
+
+2 Crow with a large orange macula on apex; pronotum with two broad red longitudinal bands behind each eye extended from anterior to posterior margin of pronotum.......................................................
+
+C
+.
+distinctissima
+
+
+
+
+
+2’ Crow and pronotum without maculae..............................................................
+
+C
+.
+undata
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+3 Aedeagus with one or more processes (
+Fig. 1K
+)............................................................. 4
+
+
+
+3’ Aedeagus without processes............................................................................. 7
+
+
+
+
+
+4 Aedeagus with paired lateroventral processes (
+Chiamolera & Cavichioli, 2000
+b; Figs 7, 8)................. C.
+
+sinopensis
+
+
+
+
+
+4’ Aedeagus with a single ventral process (
+Fig. 1K
+)............................................................ 5
+
+
+
+
+
+
+5 Aedeagus with ventral process short, basally fused to shaft (
+Fig. 1K
+)..............................
+
+C
+.
+aroeira
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+
+5’ Aedeagus with ventral process long, arising from preatrium, not fused to shaft (
+Chiamolera & Cavichioli, 2005
+; Fig. 18)....6
+
+
+
+
+
+
+6 Male
+pygofer with dorsoapical portion strongly projected, with a small ventral spine at base (
+Chiamolera & Cavichioli, 2005
+; Fig. 16); aedeagus with shaft narrow along its entire length (
+Chiamolera & Cavichioli, 2005
+; Fig. 18)..........
+
+C
+.
+diminuta
+
+
+
+
+
+6’ Male pygofer with the dorsoapical portion slightly projected, without spine at base (
+Linnavuori, 1965
+;
+Fig. 4a
+); aedeagus with shaft broad at base and narrowing towards apex (
+Linnavuori, 1965
+;
+Fig. 3i
+).............................
+
+C
+.
+brasiliensis
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+7 Male
+pygofer without tooth or process on ventral margin (
+DeLong, 1953
+; Plate 8, Fig. 8)......................
+
+C
+.
+spina
+
+
+
+
+7’ Male pygofer with tooth or process on ventral margin.........................................................8
+
+
+
+
+
+8 Forewing with a dark brown oblique stripe on apical third (
+Chiamolera & Cavichioli, 2005
+; Fig. 7); anal tube with paired ventral processes (
+Chiamolera & Cavichioli, 2005
+;
+Fig. 2
+)................................................
+
+C
+.
+bella
+
+
+
+
+8’ Forewing without an oblique stripe on apical third; anal tube without processes.................................... 9
+
+
+
+
+
+9 Forewing with a pair of dark maculae adjacent to anal margin, a larger one on apical parts of anal veins and a smaller one at base of first apical cell; male pygofer with dorsapical portion projected and strongly curved ventrally, ventral margin with a long and slender subapical process directed ventrally (
+DeLong, 1953
+; Plate 8, Fig. 7).............................
+
+C
+.
+bimaculata
+
+
+
+
+9’ Forewing without maculae; male pygofer with dorsoapical portion, if projected, directed caudally, not strongly curved ventrally, ventral margin with small tooth......................................................................... 10
+
+
+
+
+10 Crown flat; male pygofer with dorsoapical margin abruptly narrow and projected, forming an apical spiniform process; aedeagus with shaft curved anteriorly.............................................................................11
+
+
+10’ Crown concave or with a median elevation; male pygofer with apical third progressively narrowed, not forming a process; aedeagus with shaft not curved anteriorly..................................................................12
+
+
+
+
+
+11 Aedeagus with ventral margin smooth, apex, in lateral view, rounded (
+Kramer, 1964
+; Fig. 99)..............
+
+C
+.
+rubrolineata
+
+
+
+
+
+11’ Aedeagus with ventral margin crenulated, apex, in lateral view, acute (
+Kramer, 1964
+; Fig. 95)................
+
+C
+.
+roceata
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+12 Mesonotum with brown maculae; male pygofer with dorsal margin of apical half smooth, apex acutely rounded and directed caudally (
+Chiamolera & Cavichioli, 2000
+a;
+Fig. 2
+); aedeagus with apical portion curved caudally (
+Chiamolera & Cavichioli, 2000
+a;
+Fig. 4
+)..............................................................................
+
+C
+.
+ferruginea
+
+
+
+
+
+12’ Mesonotum pale yellow, without maculae (
+Chiamolera & Cavichioli, 2005
+; Fig. 14); male pygofer with dorsal margin of apical half crenulated, apex acute and directed ventrally (
+Chiamolera & Cavichioli, 2005
+; Fig. 9); aedeagus with apical portion directed dorsally (
+Chiamolera & Cavichioli, 2005
+; Fig. 11)..............................................
+
+C
+.
+stricta
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Descriptions of Nymphs
+
+
+(
+Fig. 4
+)
+
+
+General description.
+Resembling the adult in general form. Coloration yellow (yellowish-green in life), with faint orangish markings; dorsum slightly more orangish than the venter, light yellow. Head triangular, with width equal to that of pronotum; marginal carina at crown-face transition well developed. Eyes slightly darkened. Antenne slightly longer than the body length. Hind wing pad with a pair of apical setae. Terga IV-VII with a pair of lateral setae, tergum VIII with two pairs of lateral setae, tergum IX with several elongate setae and triangular/acute distal lobes.
+
+
+First instar.
+Length
+1.40–2.14mm
+(See
+Table 1
+for other measurements).Abdominal tergum IX not differentiated in distal lobes (
+Fig. 4A
+).
+
+
+Second instar.
+Length
+2.20–3.15 mm
+. Wing pads development started, with fore wingpads not reaching half of metanotum, tergum IX of abdomen with formed distal lobes, with apex acute (
+Fig. 4B
+).
+
+
+Third instar.
+Length
+3.35–3.96 mm
+. Wing pads well differentiated in fore and hind pads, with forewing pads much more developed than hind and reaching or trespassing half of metanotum (
+Fig. 4C
+).
+
+
+
+TABLE 1.
+Measurements in millimeters of
+
+Coelidiana aroeira
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+nymph instars. (n= number of specimens analyzed)
+
+
+
+
+
+| Instar |
+Thorax Head length length |
+Abdomen length |
+Body length |
+Pronotum length |
+Head width |
+Pronotum width |
+
+
+| First (n=5) |
+0.30-0.42 |
+0.30-0.50 |
+0.80-1.30 |
+1.40-2.14 |
+0.10 |
+0.42-0.72 |
+0.40-0.72 |
+
+
+| Second (n=12) |
+0.37-0.53 |
+0.59-0.78 |
+1,03-1,87 |
+2.20-3.15 |
+0.16-0.18 |
+0.66-0.75 |
+0.66-0.75 |
+
+
+| Third (n=12) |
+0.44-0.68 |
+0.64-1.00 |
+1.52-2.45 |
+3.40-4.00 |
+0.16-0.25 |
+0.80-0.95 |
+0.80-1.00 |
+
+
+| Fourth (n=6) |
+0.50-0.70 |
+1.00-1.20 |
+2.10-2.60 |
+4.00-4.40 |
+0.20-0.30 |
+1.00-1.20 |
+1.20-1.30 |
+
+
+| Fifth (n=9) |
+0.55-0.75 |
+1.10-1.45 |
+2.35-3.56 |
+4.35-5.60 |
+0.25-0.30 |
+1.00-1.20 |
+1.15-1.30 |
+
+
+
+
+
+FIGURE 4.
+Immature stages.
+A
+, first instar.
+B
+, second instar.
+C
+, third instar.
+D
+, fourth instar.
+E
+, fifth instar. Scale bar in mm
+
+
+
+
+FIGURE 5.
+Fifth instar nymph terminalia of
+
+Coelidiana aroeira
+
+
+sp. nov
+.
+
+A
+, Male plates.
+B
+, Female plates.
+
+
+
+Fourth instar.
+Length 3.65–4.0 mm. Wing pads both developed but strongly flattened, broadened, fore wing pad with apex reaching the apex of the hing wing pad, both with rounded apices (
+Fig. 4D
+).
+
+
+Fifth instar.
+Length
+4.35–5.60 mm
+. Wing pads well developed, tumid, with apices overlapped, distal portion of abdomen differentiated in male and female plates (
+Fig 4E
+). Male plates (
+Fig. 5A
+) are a single, short and broad structure, only apically divided. Female plates (
+Fig. 5B
+) are two elongate structures, narrowing gradually towards apex.
+
+
+Remarks.
+All stages are very similar to each other in morphology and coloration, differing mainly in wing pad development and body size. The nymphs exhibit a noticeable developmental leap from the second to third instars, as evidenced in a strong increase in body size. However, the size difference is more subtle between other instars, making them different to distinguish based on size alone. The relative wing pad size is approximately constant between all observed specimens of each instar and is, therefore, more reliable characteristic for distinguishing instars. Nevertheless, the fourth and the fifth instars have nearly the same wing pad length but the wing pads differ in form: flattened in the fourth and tumid in the fifth instar.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/E9/02/D1/E902D143FFBA0E2BFF2762F0ECCDFA18.xml b/data/E9/02/D1/E902D143FFBA0E2BFF2762F0ECCDFA18.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a0b9c7a60f6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/E9/02/D1/E902D143FFBA0E2BFF2762F0ECCDFA18.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,353 @@
+
+
+
+A new species of Sphaeronemoura (Plecoptera: Nemouridae) from Guizhou, China with a revised key to males of this genus
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhu, Ya-Fei
+0009-0000-5001-3190
+College of Plant Protection & Institute of Applied Entomology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
+1538544166@qq.com
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Du, Yu-Zhou
+College of Plant Protection & Institute of Applied Entomology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China & Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, the Ministry of Education, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-10-25
+
+
+5529
+
+
+2
+
+
+373
+380
+
+
+
+
+http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5529.2.8
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5529.2.8
+1175-5326
+14022545
+E6903A6B-B76A-4356-B67E-C29B74472D7A
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Key to
+
+Sphaeronemoura
+
+males (modified from
+Sivec & Stark 2010
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+1. Tergum 10 unmodified................................................................................. 2
+
+
+- Tergum 10 with a projection on either side near epiproct...................................................... 3
+
+
+
+
+
+2. Epiproct flagellum in dorsal aspect shaped like a question mark; outer lobe of paraproct apically swollen; cerci without apical or subapical spine.........................................................................
+
+S. paraproctalis
+
+
+
+
+
+- Epiproct flagellum in dorsal aspect long, slender and hooked at tip; outer lobe of paraproct narrowed at tip; cerci with apical and subapical spines.........................................................................
+
+S. spinacercia
+
+
+
+
+
+
+3. Tergum 8 unmodified.................................................................................. 4
+
+
+- Tergum 8 modified, protruding posteriorly................................................................ 11
+
+
+
+
+4. Cercus unmodified.................................................................................... 5
+
+
+
+- Cercus large and elongate, with a medial finger-like projection......................................
+
+S. grandicauda
+
+
+
+
+
+
+5. Epiproct flagellum apex curved.......................................................................... 6
+
+
+
+- Epiproct flagellum apex straight..................................................................
+
+S. elephas
+
+
+
+
+
+
+6. Apex of flagellum acute................................................................................ 7
+
+
+- Apex of flagellum blunt................................................................................ 9
+
+
+
+
+7. Inner paraproct lobe longer than median lobe............................................................... 8
+
+
+
+- Inner paraproct lobe shorter than median lobe, outer lobes thumb shaped.................................
+
+S. malickyi
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+8. Inner paraproct lobe finger-like, apex blunt............................................................
+
+S. siveci
+
+
+
+
+
+- Inner paraproct lobe slender and triangular, apex acute.................................................
+
+S. hainana
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+9. Outer paraproct lobe slightly wider than inner lobe..................................................
+
+S. hamistyla
+
+
+
+
+- Outer paraproct lobe not wider than inner lobe............................................................. 10
+
+
+
+
+
+10. Outer paraproct lobe thumb shaped,...............................................................
+
+S. shimizui
+
+
+
+
+
+- Outer paraproct lobe slender, apex of flagellum foot shaped...............................................
+
+S. poda
+
+
+
+
+
+
+11. Legs brown with wide yellow femoral band............................................................... 12
+
+
+- Legs uniformly brown................................................................................ 13
+
+
+
+
+
+12. Inner paraproct lobe apex bifurcate and pointed..................................................
+
+S. kunmingensis
+
+
+
+
+
+- Inner paraproct lobe simple, without apex bifurcate................................................
+
+S. inthanonica
+
+
+
+
+
+
+13. Tergum 8 process bilobed.............................................................................. 14
+
+
+- Tergum 8 process entire............................................................................... 17
+
+
+
+
+
+14. Tergum 8 process asymmetrical................................................................
+
+S. asymmetria
+
+
+
+
+- Tergum 8 process symmetrical.......................................................................... 15
+
+
+
+
+
+15. Cercus with four knobs at apex.................................................................
+
+S. tetragona
+
+
+
+
+- Cercus without four knobs at apex....................................................................... 16
+
+
+
+
+
+16. Epiproct flagellum with an acute apex.............................................................
+
+S. separata
+
+
+
+
+
+- Epiproct flagellum without an acute tip; cercus truncate................................................
+
+S. plutonis
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+17. Tergum 8 process barely projecting beyond posterior margin of tergum 8................................
+
+S. formosana
+
+
+
+
+- Tergum 8 process projecting well beyond posterior margin of tergum 8.......................................... 18
+
+
+
+
+18. Tergum 8 process recurved and bow-shaped or subquadrate................................................... 19
+
+
+- Tergum 8 process nearly trapezoidal..................................................................... 20
+
+
+
+
+
+19. Tergum 8 process recurved and bow-shaped; cercus bilobed, swollen like crab claws..............
+
+S. fanjingshana
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+
+- Tergum 8 process subquadrate..................................................................
+
+S. songshana
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+20. Flagellum with multiple distinct curves.........................................................
+
+S. multicurvata
+
+
+
+
+- Flagellum without multiple distinct curves................................................................ 21
+
+
+
+
+
+21. Median paraproct lobe bilobed..................................................................
+
+S. acutispina
+
+
+
+
+
+- Median paraproct lobe entire; cercus apex slightly trifurcate..........................................
+
+S. campylura
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file